ORCHARD REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE CENTER

629 STATE HIGHWAY 21 SOUTH, HAYNEVILLE, AL 36040 (334) 548-5995
For profit - Corporation 72 Beds BALL HEALTHCARE SERVICES Data: November 2025 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
56/100
#68 of 223 in AL
Last Inspection: April 2021

Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.

Overview

Orchard Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center has a Trust Grade of C, which means it is average and positioned in the middle of the pack among nursing homes. It ranks #68 out of 223 facilities in Alabama, placing it in the top half, and is the only option in Lowndes County. The facility is improving, having reduced issues from 1 in 2019 to none in 2021. Staffing is generally a strength, with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 46%, which is slightly below the state average of 48%. However, there have been critical incidents, such as a failure to perform CPR on a resident with Full Code status, which raises concerns about emergency response procedures. On a positive note, the facility has no fines on record and offers more RN coverage than 93% of similar facilities, which helps ensure better care for residents.

Trust Score
C
56/100
In Alabama
#68/223
Top 30%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
1 → 0 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
46% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Alabama facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 47 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Alabama. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2019: 1 issues
2021: 0 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 46%

Near Alabama avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Chain: BALL HEALTHCARE SERVICES

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 4 deficiencies on record

2 life-threatening
Jan 2019 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Laboratory Services (Tag F0770)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews, and review of a facility policy titled Diagnostic Testing Services, the facility failed to e...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews, and review of a facility policy titled Diagnostic Testing Services, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #5's lab orders for a Comprehensive Metabolic Profile (CMP), Liver Panel, Lipid Panel, Valproic Acid and Complete Blood Count (CBC) were collected and run in September as ordered by the physician. Further, the facility failed to ensure RI #5's Valproic Acid was collected in December as ordered by the physician. This affected 1 of 15 sampled residents for whom labwork was reviewed. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled, Diagnostic Testing Services, with an effective date of February 2004, revealed the following: . Purpose: Each resident has the right to receive diagnostic services, . Standard: Diagnostic testing should be scheduled by a physician's order. RI #5 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Vascular Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Hyperlipidemia, Hypertension, Unspecified Psychosis and Cerebrovascular Disease. RI #5's September 2018 Physician's Orders included orders dated 05/12/2016 for a Valproic Acid every three months in March, June, September and December and a CMP, Liver Panel, Lipid Panel, and CBC every six months in March and September. A review of RI #5's lab reports from March 2018 through January 2019 revealed the CMP, Liver Panel, Lipid Panel, and CBC were all performed in March, but not in September. The Valproic Acid was drawn in March and June, but was not performed in September and December. On 01/31/19 at 11:10 a.m., Employee Identifier (EI) #2, Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor, was asked about RI #5's missing labs. EI #2 stated they did not have them, and did not know if they had been done. EI #2 said RI #5 should have had a CMP, Liver Panel, Lipid Panel, Valproic Acid and CBC completed in September and December. When asked why it was important to monitor labs as ordered by the physician, EI #2 explained the physician's orders should be followed to make sure they are getting correct amount of medication in case it needs to be adjusted and the labwork could indicate medical intervention was needed. EI #4, the Director of Nursing, was interviewed on 01/31/2019 at 11:44 a.m EI #4 reviewed RI #5's lab orders and stated RI #5 should have had a CMP, Liver Panel, Lipid Panel, Valproic Acid and CBC completed every six months in March and September. She also said RI #5 should have had a Valproic Acid completed in December. After reviewing all of RI #5's lab reports from March 2018 until February 2018, EI #4 said the labs were not collected as ordered. EI #4 said it was important to monitor labwork as ordered by the physician for treatment purposes.
Mar 2018 3 deficiencies 2 IJ
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and review of Resident Identifier (RI) #215's medical record, the facility's investigation file, the (Name) ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and review of Resident Identifier (RI) #215's medical record, the facility's investigation file, the (Name) AMBULANCE Patient Care Report and a complaint submitted the Alabama State Survey Agency, the facility failed to honor the wishes of RI #215, a resident with Full Code status. Code status describes what type of intervention a health care facility would conduct should a resident stop breathing and/or their heart stop beating. Full Code status means when a resident stops breathing and/or their heart stops beating, staff are to activate the emergency response system and initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) in an attempt to revive the resident. During the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift that began on [DATE], Employee Identifier (EI) #4, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) entered RI #215's room and found the resident unresponsive. EI #4 informed EI #3, the Registered Nurse (RN), who was certified in CPR. EI #3 assessed the resident and found RI #215 did not have a pulse or respiration. After the assessment, EI #3 left the resident's room to activate the emergency response system. EI #3 did not return to the resident's room to initiate CPR. According to the (Name) AMBULANCE Patient Care Report, CPR was not being performed when they arrived. This deficient practice placed RI #215, one of 21 sampled residents, in immediate jeopardy of serious injury, harm, or death. On [DATE] at 4:15 PM, the Administrator and Director of Nursing were notified of the findings of immediate jeopardy in the area of Resident Rights, F 578. Findings include: On [DATE] at 12:21 PM, the facility submitted to the Alabama State Survey Agency an allegation of neglect. According to the report, Employee Identifier (EI) #3, a Registered Nurse (RN) failed to perform Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) on RI #215, a resident with Full Code status, who was found unresponsive on [DATE] at 5:45 AM. A typed statement on facility letterhead dated [DATE] signed by EI #2, the Director of Nursing (DON) documented Orchard Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center's Procedure for Identifying Residents Code Status In each resident's chart there is a form labeled; Resident Information Sheet. A Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) sticker is placed on this form indicating to the clinical staff that the resident has a DNR order and no CPR is warranted in the event the resident is found with no pulse, no respirations, no heartbeat or unconsciousness. Otherwise, the resident is a Full Code and CPR should be initiated. The nurses may but, is not required to write the Resident Information Sheet the words Full code which indicates CPR is to be provided if indicated. RI #215 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with an admitting diagnosis of Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance. RI #215's undated RESIDENT INFORMATION SHEETS indicated the resident was a Full Code. The facility's 5-Day Investigation for (RI #215) dated [DATE], documented . On [DATE] around 5:45am, (EI #3), RN was informed by (EI #4), CNA that the resident was unresponsive and wasn't breathing. According to the nurse's notes after (EI #3) assessed the resident and found no pulse, no rise or fall in chest. Then, (EI #3) called the ambulance and informed them of resident's status. At 5:50 a.m., the ambulance arrived at the facility, EKG (electrocardiogram) strip obtained, indicating no signs of life . On [DATE], approximately 9:30a.m., the director of nursing (DON) audited the resident's medical record and upon reviewing the nurse's notes regarding the occurrences of events involving resident's expiration. During the audit, the initiation of CPR was not documented in the notes . around 10:30 a.m. DON asked her (EI #3) if CPR was performed on resident and nurse stated, No, I forgot . The facility substantiated that CPR was not performed by (EI #3), RN. On [DATE] at 11:20 AM, a telephone interview was conducted with EI #3, the RN who was notified that RI #215 was found unresponsive. EI #3 was asked, what did the American Heart Association CPR guidelines instruct staff to do when a person was found unresponsive. EI #3 said staff should check the pulse, check to see if the resident is breathing and initiate CPR. EI #3 was asked, what actions she took when she was informed RI #215 was unresponsive. EI #3 said she went into RI #215's room, checked the resident's pulse and looked to see if RI #215 was breathing. EI #3 said, RI #215's skin was cool to touch. After assessing RI #215, EI #3 left the resident's room to call the ambulance. EI #3 was asked if she had called a code or initiated CPR on RI #215. EI #3 said, no. When asked why she did not initiate CPR or call a code, EI #3 replied she panicked and forgot. When asked what RI #215's code status was, EI #3 stated she thought RI #215 was a Full Code. EI #3 explained that she had RI #215's medical record when she called the ambulance, but she did not check it to see what RI #215's code status was. EI #3 stated she did not think to check the resident's code status. When asked why not, EI #3 stated she panicked and forgot. In a follow-up telephone interview on [DATE] at 3:53 PM, EI #3 was asked what the harm was in failing to initiate CPR on RI #215, a resident withe Full Code status. EI #3 replied, the resident's wishes were not followed. RI #215's Departmental Notes, written by EI #3 and dated [DATE] 8:53 AM, documented: . 545AM Called to room by CNA. Resident lying in bed with eyes slightly open and mouth open with yellowish colored substance noted on gown and sheet. Unable to obtain pulse, no rise or fall of chest noted. (Name) Ambulance called and informed of resident status. 550 AM . (Name) Ambulance in facility, EKG strip ran, no sign of life noted. (Name) Ambulance exited building @ (at) 6AM . The (Name) AMBULANCE Patient Care Report indicated on [DATE] at 5:37 AM, EMS received an emergency call that RI #215 was found unresponsive in bed. According to the report, EMS arrived on scene at 5:45 AM and to the resident at 5:53 AM. The report further indicated . Arrived to find pt (patient) unresponsive in bed. Eyes dry pupils fixed and dialated (dilated), pulseless and apnic (apneic). Skin cool to touch color normal. No JVD (Jugular Vein Distention) or edema. Asystole times 3 leads pacing spikes. Rigor starting to set in. No CPR being performed . No ACLS (Advanced Cardiac Life Support) pronounced at 0600 . In an interview on [DATE] at 9:50 AM, EI #1, the Administrator, was asked what should be done when a resident was found unresponsive. EI #1 said, CPR should be initiated. When asked if the facility's protocol was followed when RI #215 was found unresponsive on [DATE], EI #1 said no. EI #1 was asked, what should EI #3, the RN, have done when she was informed RI #215 was unresponsive, EI #1 said, EI #3 should have started CPR. When asked what the harm was in failing to provide CPR to RI #215, a resident with Full Code status, EI #1 said the resident's wishes were not followed. Contained within the facility's investigation was a document titled . ACTION PLAN TOOL . DATE: [DATE] PROBLEM IDENTIFIED: CPR not initiated ACTION PLAN Discussion in Interdisciplinary morning meeting regarding facility's current procedure to perform CPR, if indicated, providing the resident is not a DNR status. A DNR sticker is found on the Resident Information Sheet to alert the nurse of a DNR status. Discussion was if facility needed to add another sticker that says Full Code to all charts that are not a DNR. Plan at this time is not to change the current procedure for identifying a resident's code status. However, there is a QAPI opportunity to train & re-educate all nurses on proper procedure on when to perform CPR. Training in progress since [DATE], regarding when to perform CPR . COMPLETION DATE [DATE] DATE COMPLETION FINALIZED [DATE]. ****************************** On [DATE] at 2:15 PM the facility submitted an acceptable Allegation of Credible Compliance (AOCC), which documented: . F578=IJ 1. On [DATE], RI#215 was admitted to the facility with a full code status. 2. On [DATE], RN did not perform Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) on RI#215 after she accessed the resident and found that the resident was unresponsive. 3. On [DATE], RN received 1:1 training by the DON on performing CPR on a resident who is found unresponsive or no signs of life. The residents code status should be determined and the code status is followed according to the resident's Advance Directive. If the resident is a full code, the nurse should perform CPR. A resident is a full code unless, there is a Do not resuscitate (DNR) sticker in front of the chart on the Patient Information sheet. A DNR sticker on the chart means that CPR is not warranted. All RNs received training on performing CPR by the DON on [DATE] which included: if a resident is found unresponsive or no sign of life the resident code status should be determined and code status is followed according to their Advance Directive. The nurse should perform CPR on a resident who is a full code. A resident is a full code unless, there is a Do not resuscitate (DNR) sticker in front of the chart on the Patient Information sheet. A DNR sticker on the chart means CPR is not warranted. 4. On [DATE], DON reviewed all residents' current charts to ensure the code is status clearly indicated for quick access by staff. 5. On [DATE], all charts were reviewed and found code status accurate. 6. On [DATE], the RN who failed to perform CPR was placed on suspension for 5 days and then placed on administrative leave [DATE]. RN has not worked between the suspension and the administrative leave. 7. On [DATE], the RN that failed to perform CPR was reported to the Alabama Board of Nursing. 8. On [DATE], an inservice was conducted for all licensed staff on 7-3 shift, 3-11 shift and 11-7 shift prior to the beginning of their shift. The training included, performing CPR on full code residents who are found unresponsive or no sign of life. The resident's code status should be determined and the code status followed according to their Advance Directive. The nurse should perform CPR on a resident who is a full code. A resident is a full code unless, there is a Do not resuscitate (DNR) sticker in front of the chart on the Patient Information sheet. A DNR sticker on the chart means CPR is not warranted. This training was conducted by the DON. 9. On [DATE], all licensed staff have received training on when to perform CPR when a resident found unresponsive or no sign of life. The resident code status should be determine and code status followed according to their advance directive. The nurse should perform CPR on a resident who is a full code. A resident is a full code unless there is a Do not resuscitate (DNR) sticker in front of the chart on the Patient Information sheet. A DNR sticker on the chart means CPR is not warranted. New hired licensed staff will receive CPR training during orientation. ************************ After reviewing the facility's information provided in their AOCC and verifying the immediate actions had been implemented, the scope/severity level of F 578 was lowered to a D level on [DATE], to allow the facility time to monitor and/or revise their corrective actions as necessary to achieve substantial compliance. This deficiency was cited as a result of an investigation of complaint/report number AL00035599.
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0678 (Tag F0678)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, review of Resident Identifier (RI) #215's medical record, the facility's policy with a subject of Advance D...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, review of Resident Identifier (RI) #215's medical record, the facility's policy with a subject of Advance Directives and Refusal of Treatment, the HIGHLIGHTS of the 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) and ECC (Emergency Cardiovascular Care), the (Name) AMBULANCE Patient Care Report and a complaint submitted the Alabama State Survey Agency, Employee Identifier (EI) #3, a Registered Nurse (RN) failed to perform CPR on RI #215, a resident with Full Code status, who was found unresponsive, without a pulse or respiration, on [DATE]. Code status describes what type of intervention a health care facility would conduct should a resident stop breathing and/or their heart stops beating. Full Code status means when a resident stops breathing and/or their heart stops beating, staff are to activate the emergency response system and initiate CPR in an attempt to revive the resident. During the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift that began on [DATE], EI #4, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) entered RI #215's room and found the resident unresponsive. EI #4 informed EI #3, the RN, who was certified in CPR. EI #3 assessed the resident and found RI #215 did not have a pulse or respiration. After the assessment, EI #3 left the resident's room to activate the emergency response system. EI #3 did not return to the resident's room to initiate CPR. According to the (Name) AMBULANCE Patient Care Report, CPR was not being performed when they arrived. This deficient practice placed RI #215, one of 21 sampled residents, in immediate jeopardy of serious injury, harm, or death. On [DATE] at 4:15 PM, the Administrator and Director of Nursing were notified of the findings of substandard quality of care at the immediate jeopardy level in the area of Quality Life, F 678. Findings include: On [DATE] at 12:21 PM, the facility submitted to the Alabama State Survey Agency an allegation of neglect. According to the report, Employee Identifier (EI) #3, a Registered Nurse (RN) failed to perform Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) on RI #215, a resident with Full Code status, who was found unresponsive on [DATE] at 5:45 AM. The facility's undated BALL HEALTH CARE SERVICES INC. ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY with a subject of Advance Directives and Refusal of Treatment documented: . STANDARD: . Prior to the arrival of EMS, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) will be initiated for residents when cardiac arrest occurs, for residents who have requested CPR in their advanced directives, for residents who do not have a valid DNR order . The American Heart Association's HIGHLIGHTS of the 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for CPR and ECC with a copyright date of 2015 documented . Summary of High-Quality CPR Components for BLS (Basic Life Support) Providers . Check for responsiveness No breathing or only gasping (ie, no normal breathing) No definite pulse felt within 10 seconds . If you are alone with no mobile phone, leave the victim to activate the emergency response system and get the AED (Automatic External Defibrillator) before beginning CPR Otherwise, send someone and begin CPR immediately . RI #215 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with an admitting diagnosis of Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance. RI #215's undated RESIDENT INFORMATION SHEETS indicated the resident was a Full Code. The facility's 5-Day Investigation for (RI #215) dated [DATE], documented . On [DATE] around 5:45am, (EI #3), RN was informed by (EI #4), CNA that the resident was unresponsive and wasn't breathing. According to the nurse's notes after (EI #3) assessed the resident and found no pulse, no rise or fall in chest. Then, (EI #3) called the ambulance and informed them of resident's status. At 5:50 a.m., the ambulance arrived at the facility, EKG (electrocardiogram) strip obtained, indicating no signs of life . On [DATE], approximately 9:30a.m., the director of nursing (DON) audited the resident's medical record and upon reviewing the nurse's notes regarding the occurrences of events involving resident's expiration. During the audit, the initiation of CPR was not documented in the notes . around 10:30 a.m. DON asked her (EI #3) if CPR was performed on resident and nurse stated, No, I forgot . The facility substantiated that CPR was not performed by (EI #3), RN. On [DATE] at 11:05 AM, a telephone interview was conducted with EI #4, the CNA assigned to care for RI #215 during the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift, beginning on [DATE]. EI #4 stated she was unsure of the time, but it was during her last rounds, she discovered RI #215 was unresponsive. When asked what she did, EI #4 stated she left the room to inform the Charge Nurse, EI #3. After notifying the Charge Nurse, EI #4 stated she and the Charge Nurse went to RI #215's room. According to EI #4, EI #3 assessed the resident. After assessing the resident, EI #3 left the resident's room and went to the nurses' station. EI #4 stated she was unsure what the Charge Nurse, EI #3, did at the nurses' station. Then EI #4 stated she noticed the paramedics came to the facility and hooked RI #215 up to a machine. When asked what RI #215's code status was, EI #4 said she did not know. When asked if a code was called, EI #4 said no. On [DATE] at 11:20 AM, a telephone interview was conducted with EI #3, the RN who was notified that RI #215 was found unresponsive. EI #3 acknowledged she was CPR certified. EI #3 was asked, what did the American Heart Association CPR guidelines instruct staff to do when a person was found unresponsive. EI #3 said staff should check the pulse, check to see if the resident is breathing and initiate CPR. EI #3 was asked, what actions she took when she was informed RI #215 was unresponsive. EI #3 said she went into RI #215's room, checked the resident's pulse and looked to see if RI #215 was breathing. EI #3 said, RI #215's skin was cool to touch. After assessing RI #215, EI #3 left the resident's room to call the ambulance. EI #3 was asked if she had called a code or initiated CPR on RI #215. EI #3 said, no. When asked why she did not initiate CPR or call a code, EI #3 replied she panicked and forgot. When asked what RI #215's code status was, EI #3 stated she thought RI #215 was a Full Code. EI #3 explained that she had RI #215's medical record when she called the ambulance, but she did not check it to see what RI #215's code status was. EI #3 stated she did not think to check the resident's code status. When asked why not, EI #3 stated she panicked and forgot. In a follow-up telephone interview on [DATE] at 3:53 PM, EI #3 was asked did she have a cell phone or any other communication device to call for assistance. EI #3 replied she had a cell phone. When asked if she used her cell phone to call the ambulance/Emergency Medical Service (EMS), EI #3 said no, she used the telephone at the nurses' station. EI #3 was asked what she did after she called EMS. EI #3 replied she was in panic mode. She did not know if she went back in RI #215's room or if she went into the office. EI #3 stated she knew she went in the office and made a copy of RI #215's face sheet for EMS. RI #215's Departmental Notes, written by EI #3 and dated [DATE] 8:53 AM, documented: . 545AM Called to room by CNA. Resident lying in bed with eyes slightly open and mouth open with yellowish colored substance noted on gown and sheet. Unable to obtain pulse, no rise or fall of chest noted. (Name) Ambulance called and informed of resident status. 550 AM . (Name) Ambulance in facility, EKG strip ran, no sign of life noted. (Name) Ambulance exited building @ (at) 6AM . The (Name) AMBULANCE Patient Care Report indicated on [DATE] at 5:37 AM, EMS received an emergency call that RI #215 was found unresponsive in bed. According to the report, EMS arrived on scene at 5:45 AM and to the resident at 5:53 AM. The report further indicated . Arrived to find pt (patient) unresponsive in bed. Eyes dry pupils fixed and dialated (dilated), pulseless and apnic (apneic). Skin cool to touch color normal. No JVD (Jugular Vein Distention) or edema. Asystole times 3 leads pacing spikes. Rigor starting to set in. No CPR being performed . No ACLS (Advanced Cardiac Life Support) pronounced at 0600 . On [DATE] at 10:04 AM, an interview was conducted with EI #2, the Director of Nursing (DON). When asked what RI #215's code status was, EI #2 replied the resident was Full Code. When asked if a code was called when RI #215 was found unresponsive, EI #2 said no, not according to the nurse's note. When asked was CPR initiated when RI #215 was found unresponsive, EI #2 said no. When asked was the facility's policy followed and correct actions taken when RI #215 was found unresponsive, EI #2 said no. In a follow-up interview on [DATE] at 3:31 PM, EI #2 was asked what steps staff should take when a resident is found unresponsive. EI #2 said, assess the resident, and check the resident's chart to see if the resident is a Full Code. If a Full Code, initiate CPR. When asked if CPR was initiated on RI #215, EI #2 said no. In an interview on [DATE] at 9:50 AM, EI #1, the Administrator, was asked what should be done when a resident was found unresponsive. EI #1 said, CPR should be initiated. When asked if the facility's protocol was followed when RI #215 was found unresponsive on [DATE], EI #1 said no. EI #1 was asked, what should EI #3, the RN, have done when she was informed RI #215 was unresponsive, EI #1 said, EI #3 should have started CPR. Contained within the facility's investigation was a document titled . ACTION PLAN TOOL . DATE: [DATE] PROBLEM IDENTIFIED: CPR not initiated ACTION PLAN Discussion in Interdisciplinary morning meeting regarding facility's current procedure to perform CPR, if indicated, providing the resident is not a DNR status. A DNR sticker is found on the Resident Information Sheet to alert the nurse of a DNR status. Discussion was if facility needed to add another sticker that says Full Code to all charts that are not a DNR. Plan at this time is not to change the current procedure for identifying a resident's code status. However, there is a QAPI opportunity to train & re-educate all nurses on proper procedure on when to perform CPR. Training in progress since [DATE], regarding when to perform CPR . COMPLETION DATE [DATE] DATE COMPLETION FINALIZED [DATE]. *************************** On [DATE] at 2:15 PM, the facility submitted an acceptable Allegation of Credible Compliance (AOCC), which documented: F678=IJ 1. On [DATE], RI #215 was admitted to the facility with a full code status. 2. On [DATE], RI#215 was found unresponsive by the RN and CPR was not initiated. 3. On [DATE], the RN was educated and then reeducated on [DATE] on performing CPR on residents that are full code. The code status is located in the front of the medical records on the Patient Information sheet. Education provided by the DON. 4. On [DATE], all other RNs were educated on when to performing CPR on a resident who are full code status. The code status is located in the front of the medical records on the Patient Information sheet. Education provided by the DON. 5. On [DATE], the DON implemented a weekly monitoring tool titled Deaths Facility to identify if CPR was performed on residents who were full code. 6. On [DATE], all other licensed staff was educated on performing on full code. The code status is located in the front of the medical records on the Patient Information sheet. The education was provided by the DON. 7. On [DATE], the DON reviewed all resident records using the facility census to determine which residents were full code and those who were DNR and that the code status was clearly identified in the medical records. 8. On [DATE], 3/11 and 11/7 were in-serviced prior to the beginning of the shift on Neglect and goods and service to care for the resident including CPR. All licensed staff will be in serviced by [DATE] by the DON or Designee. All other licensed nursing will be in serviced prior to the beginning of their shifts. Based on a review of the facility's in-service record, as of [DATE], nine of nine Registered Nurses and 10 of 11 Licensed Practical Nurses had been in-serviced on Performing CPR on residents. *************************** After reviewing the facility's information provided in their AOCC and verifying the immediate actions had been implemented, the scope/severity level of F 678 was lowered to a D level on [DATE], to allow the facility time to monitor and/or revise their corrective actions as necessary to achieve substantial compliance. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00035599.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, review of the facility's policy with a subject of Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, a report submitted to th...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, review of the facility's policy with a subject of Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, a report submitted to the Alabama State Survey Agency and Resident Identifier (RI) #1's medical record, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of neglect to the Alabama State Survey Agency. This deficient practice affected RI #215, one of 21 sampled residents and involved one of five reportable allegations of abuse and/or neglect. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, BALL HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC. ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY with a subject of Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, revised [DATE], revealed: . PROCEDURE: In response to alleged or suspected incidents involving abuse, neglect . the Facility will take the following steps: . 3. If determined to be reportable, the event will be reported to the Alabama Department of Public Health, Division of Health Care Facilities (DHCF) via the Online Incident Reporting System for Nursing Homes within two (2) hours of the incident if the event involves abuse or results in serious bodily injury, or not later than twenty-four (24) hours if the event does not involve abuse or serious bodily injury . RI #215 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with an admitting diagnosis of Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance. On [DATE] at 12:21 PM, the facility submitted to the Alabama State Survey Agency (Alabama Department of Public Health, DHCF) an allegation of neglect. According to the report, Employee Identifier (EI) #3, a Registered Nurse (RN) failed to perform Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) on RI #215, a resident with Full Code status, who was found unresponsive on [DATE] at 5:45 AM. Refer to F 678. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:50 AM, EI #1, the Administrator was asked what date did the failure of a licensed staff member to initiate CPR on RI #215, a resident with Full Code status, occur. EI #1 said, [DATE]. When asked when the incident should have been reported to the Alabama State Survey Agency, EI #1 said within two hours of the incident. EI #1 was asked why the incident was not reported within the two hours. EI #1 said, she did not know it was a reportable event. When EI #1 was asked what made the event a reportable incident, EI #1 said, neglect. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00035599.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Alabama facilities.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 4 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • Grade C (56/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Mixed indicators with Trust Score of 56/100. Visit in person and ask pointed questions.

About This Facility

What is Orchard Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns ORCHARD REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE CENTER an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Alabama, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Orchard Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center Staffed?

CMS rates ORCHARD REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 46%, compared to the Alabama average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Orchard Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center?

State health inspectors documented 4 deficiencies at ORCHARD REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE CENTER during 2018 to 2019. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 2 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Orchard Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center?

ORCHARD REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by BALL HEALTHCARE SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 72 certified beds and approximately 55 residents (about 76% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in HAYNEVILLE, Alabama.

How Does Orchard Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center Compare to Other Alabama Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Alabama, ORCHARD REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE CENTER's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (46%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Orchard Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is Orchard Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, ORCHARD REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Alabama. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Orchard Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center Stick Around?

ORCHARD REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 46%, which is about average for Alabama nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Orchard Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center Ever Fined?

ORCHARD REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Orchard Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center on Any Federal Watch List?

ORCHARD REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.