CLEBURNE COUNTY NURSING HOME

122 BROCKFORD ROAD, HEFLIN, AL 36264 (256) 463-2121
Government - County 82 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
90/100
#9 of 223 in AL
Last Inspection: March 2022

Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.

Overview

Cleburne County Nursing Home in Heflin, Alabama, has earned a Trust Grade of A, which indicates excellent quality and a high level of recommendation. It ranks #9 out of 223 nursing homes in Alabama, placing it well within the top half of facilities in the state, and is the only option in Cleburne County. However, the facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with the number of issues increasing from 0 in 2022 to 1 in 2023. Staffing is a relative strength, with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars, although the turnover rate of 53% is slightly above the state average. Recent inspections revealed concerns, including a staff member not following proper hand hygiene during meal delivery, which could potentially expose residents to infection, as well as a previous failure to report allegations of physical abuse in a timely manner. Overall, while the home has notable strengths, families should be aware of these concerns when considering care options.

Trust Score
A
90/100
In Alabama
#9/223
Top 4%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Worse
0 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
53% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Alabama facilities.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 30 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Alabama. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2022: 0 issues
2023: 1 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 53%

Near Alabama avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

The Ugly 2 deficiencies on record

Sept 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews, resident record review, and review of a facility policy titled Hand Hygiene the facility failed to ensure Employee Identifier (EI) #3, Certified Nursing Assistant (C...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, resident record review, and review of a facility policy titled Hand Hygiene the facility failed to ensure Employee Identifier (EI) #3, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), did not create the potential for cross-contamination during meal delivery on 9/25/2023 when she was observed not washing or sanitizing her hands between residents. after touching a dirty bedside table, dirty window blinds, and a resident chair before touching the clean tray cart, donning gloves and setting up a resident tray. This had the potential to affect 21 residents who received meal trays on unit two. Findings include: A facility policy titled Hand Hygiene with an implemented date of 6/1/2022 documented the following: . All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. 2. Hand hygiene is indicated and will be performed under the conditions listed in, but not limited to, the attached hand hygiene table. 6. Additional considerations: a. The use of gloves does not replace hand hygiene. If your task requires gloves, perform hand hygiene prior to donning gloves, and immediately after removing gloves. Hand Hygiene Table . Between resident contacts . After handling contaminated objects . Before applying and after removing personal protective equipment (PPE), including gloves . On 9/25/2023 at 5:14 PM, EI #2 CNA was observed delivering meal trays to residents in their rooms. EI #2 delivered a tray with bare hands, for RI #5, placing the tray on RI #5's bedside table. EI #2 then pulled the window blinds down and left the room without washing or sanitizing her hands. EI #2 then delivered a meal tray for RI #1, placing the tray on the bedside table, moving the bedside table in front of RI #1, and exiting the room without washing or sanitizing her hands. RI #4 was in the hallway in a chair. EI #2 pushed RI #4 in the chair, holding the handles of the chair, to a common area without washing or sanitizing her hands. EI #2 continued to pass out meal trays without washing or sanitizing her hands, touching the food cart down the hall, and delivering a meal tray for RI #3. EI #2 set the tray down and moved the bedside table in front of the resident. EI #2 continued out of the room without washing or sanitizing her hands, and delivered a tray for RI #2. EI #2 placed the tray on the bedside table, turned the resident around in the wheelchair by the handles of the wheelchair, and then pushed the bedside table up to the resident. EI #2 then, without washing or sanitizing her hands, donned gloves and began setting up the meal tray for RI #2, opening containers of food, drinks, silverware, and condiments. EI #2 then removed her gloves and went to the common area down the hall and pushed RI #4 in a chair from the common area to RI #4's room. EI #2 then delivered RI #4's meal tray, all without washing her hands. On 9/25/2023 at 5:30 PM EI #2 CNA was asked, when was she supposed to wash or sanitize her hands. EI #2 responded, before entering and after leaving every room. EI #2 stated, that the facility policy was to wash or sanitize hands before entering and after leaving every room. EI #2 stated, she did not sanitize or wash her hands before touching the clean trays after handling the dirty bedside tables, window shades, resident's chairs, donning or doffing gloves. EI #2 stated, the risk of not washing or sanitizing her hands after touching a dirty tray was the spread of germs, infections. EI #2 stated, she should have washed or sanitized her hands after leaving each room before picking up each clean tray. On 9/26/2023 at 11:00 AM EI #1 Infection Preventionist was asked, according to policy when should staff wash or sanitize their hands. EI #1 responded, before entering a room, when visibly dirty, when in contact with a resident, when leaving the room, and when delivering or picking up the trays. EI #1 stated, the risk for what EI #2 had done, was contamination of everything she touched. EI #1 stated, she should have washed or sanitized her hands before entering every room and leaving every room.
Jul 2019 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview, record review and a facility policy tilted Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation the facility failed to report two allegation of physical abuse involving Resident Identifier (RI) # 50 an...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, record review and a facility policy tilted Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation the facility failed to report two allegation of physical abuse involving Resident Identifier (RI) # 50 and RI # 44 within two hours of staff being made aware of the incident. This affected 2 of 3 abuse files reviewed during the survey. Findings Include: A review of a policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated March 2019 documented the following: . VII Reporting/Response . Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse . On 6/1/2019 at 11:49 AM, the State Agency received a report by the facility regarding physical abuse by RI #50 toward another resident. The report indicated the incident occurred on 5/31/19 at 5:06 PM. On 6/17/19 at 1:12 PM, the State Agency received a report by the facility regarding physical abuse by a staff toward RI #44. The report indicated the incident occurred on 6/17/19 at 7:00 AM. On 07/09/19 2:36 PM, Employee Identifier (EI) #1, Administrator was interviewed. He was asked when did the allegation of physical abuse occur concerning RI #50. EI #1 replied on 5/31/19. He was asked when was it reported to the State Agency. EI #1 replied on 6/1/19, after he became aware, that was a Saturday morning. EI #1 was asked when should it have been reported to the State Agency. He replied it should have been reported by 7:06 PM on 5/31/19. EI #1 was asked when did the incident of physical abuse involving RI #44 occur. He replied on 6/17/18 at 7:00 AM. EI #1 was asked when was it reported to the State Agency. He replied at 12:02 PM on 6/17/18. When asked when should it have been reported to the State Agency, EI #1 replied by 9:00 AM on 6/17/18. EI #1 was asked why should allegations of abuse be reported to the State Agency within 2 hours. He replied to protect the resident or others involved.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Alabama.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Alabama facilities.
  • • Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Cleburne County's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns CLEBURNE COUNTY NURSING HOME an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Alabama, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Cleburne County Staffed?

CMS rates CLEBURNE COUNTY NURSING HOME's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 53%, compared to the Alabama average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Cleburne County?

State health inspectors documented 2 deficiencies at CLEBURNE COUNTY NURSING HOME during 2019 to 2023. These included: 2 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Cleburne County?

CLEBURNE COUNTY NURSING HOME is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 82 certified beds and approximately 72 residents (about 88% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in HEFLIN, Alabama.

How Does Cleburne County Compare to Other Alabama Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Alabama, CLEBURNE COUNTY NURSING HOME's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (53%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Cleburne County?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Cleburne County Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, CLEBURNE COUNTY NURSING HOME has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Alabama. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Cleburne County Stick Around?

CLEBURNE COUNTY NURSING HOME has a staff turnover rate of 53%, which is 7 percentage points above the Alabama average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Cleburne County Ever Fined?

CLEBURNE COUNTY NURSING HOME has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Cleburne County on Any Federal Watch List?

CLEBURNE COUNTY NURSING HOME is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.