FAIRVIEW AT REDSTONE VILLAGE

12000 TURNMEYER DRIVE, HUNTSVILLE, AL 35803 (256) 881-6717
For profit - Individual 56 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
83/100
#54 of 223 in AL
Last Inspection: February 2022

Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.

Overview

Fairview at Redstone Village in Huntsville, Alabama, has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for potential residents. It ranks #54 out of 223 nursing homes in Alabama, placing it in the top half of facilities statewide, and #2 out of 12 in Madison County, meaning only one local option is better. However, the facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with issues increasing from 1 in 2019 to 2 in 2022. Staffing is a strength, with a 4 out of 5-star rating and a low turnover rate of 29%, significantly better than the state average. Notably, the facility has not incurred any fines, which is a positive sign. On the downside, there have been some concerning incidents during inspections. For example, staff members failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene when delivering and picking up meal trays, risking infection. Additionally, a medication cart was left unlocked and unattended, which could have affected the safety of residents' medications. Lastly, there was an incident where a nurse did not properly wash hands and change gloves while providing wound care, which could lead to infection risks. Overall, while Fairview at Redstone Village has strong staffing and a good reputation, families should be aware of these compliance issues.

Trust Score
B+
83/100
In Alabama
#54/223
Top 24%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Worse
1 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
29% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 19 points below Alabama's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Alabama facilities.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 36 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Alabama. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2019: 1 issues
2022: 2 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • Low Staff Turnover (29%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (29%)

    19 points below Alabama average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

No Significant Concerns Identified

This facility shows no red flags. Among Alabama's 100 nursing homes, only 1% achieve this.

The Ugly 3 deficiencies on record

Feb 2022 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and a review of the facility policy Medication Administration, the facility failed to ensure ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and a review of the facility policy Medication Administration, the facility failed to ensure Employee Identifier (EI) #4, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), one of three licensed staff observed with a medication cart, did not leave a medication cart unlocked and unattended on 2/15/22, one of four days of the survey. This affected one of two medication carts in the facility and had the potential to affect all 23 residents on level one whose medications were in the medication cart left unlocked and unattended. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled Medication Administration with an effective date of February 2021 revealed, . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 4. Medication cart will be locked or under direct observation of authorized associates. RI #11 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 2/15/22 at 6:43 PM, EI #4, LPN, was observed to position the medication cart in front of Resident Identifier (RI) #11's room to obtain RI #11's blood pressure, oxygen saturation and temperature, while leaving the medication cart unlocked. EI #4 entered RI #11's bathroom, out of site of the medication cart, and washed her hands while leaving the medication cart unlocked and unattended. On 2/15/22 at 7:18 PM EI #4 was asked how long she had worked at the facility. She replied, two going on three years. EI #4 was asked, when should she lock the medication cart. EI #4 replied, every time she was leaving the medication cart if it was not within view. EI #4 was asked, what was the risk of not locking the medication cart. EI #4 replied, somebody touching the cart, getting medications, and looking at what the residents' medications were. EI #4 was asked if she locked the medication cart when she was in RI #11's room. She replied, no. EI #4 was asked if she should have locked the medication cart, to which she replied, she should have. On 2/17/22 at 10:47 AM, an interview was conducted with EI #1, Registered Nurse/Director of Nursing. EI #1 was asked, what was the process for locking the medication cart. EI #1 replied, it should be locked when not in sight of the medication cart nurse. EI #1 was asked, when should the medication cart be left unlocked while the nurse was in a resident room giving medications. EI #1 replied, only if the cart could remain in sight of the nurse. EI #1 was asked what was the risk of leaving a medication cart unlocked while not is the sight of the nurse. EI #1 replied, the risk of someone getting in the cart.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and a review of facility policies titled MEAL SERVICE and Cleaning and Disinfection of Reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and a review of facility policies titled MEAL SERVICE and Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Equipment, the facility failed to ensure staff changed gloves and performed hand hygiene during meal delivery and pick up. On 2/14/22 during the supper meal delivery in the downstairs dining room, Employee Identifier (EI) #5 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed to deliver a supper tray to Resident Identifier (RI) #2 and RI #11 without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene before each resident's tray delivery and set up. On 2/15/22 during the breakfast meal tray pick up, EI #6, Staffing Coordinator, picked up breakfast trays from RI #251 and RI #31 without performing hand hygiene after each resident's tray was removed from their rooms. Further the facility failed to ensure EI #4, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), did not place used resident care equipment in her pocket. This had the potential to affect RI #11, RI #31, and the other 21 residents who resided on level one of the facility. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled MEAL SERVICE with an effective date of January 2010 revealed . GENERAL INFECTION CONTROL GUIDELINES . 3. Observe (standard) universal precautions or other infection control standards as approved by appropriate facility committee. 4. Perform hand hygiene between resident meal preparation . RI #2 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #11 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 2/14/22 at 5:09 PM, EI #5, CNA, was observed to set a plate from a tray in front of RI #2, cut the meat with gloves on and take the empty tray to the counter with the same gloves on. EI #5 then picked up another tray while wearing the same gloves and delivered the tray to RI #11. EI #5 opened the yogurt, put the plate on the table for RI #11, and took the tray to the counter. EI #5 then removed the gloves and put on a clean pair of gloves. On 2/14/22 at 5:19 PM, an interview was conducted with EI #5. EI #5 was asked, when did she change her gloves between RI #2 and RI #11. EI #5 replied, she did not change gloves. EI #5 was asked, what was the risk of not changing gloves between residents. EI #5 replied, sanitation and contamination. EI #5 was asked, if she should have changed her gloves between residents. EI #5 replied, yes. RI #251 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #31 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 2/15/22 at 8:34 AM, EI #6, Staffing Coordinator, was observed to exit RI #251's room with a dirty tray. EI #6 walked down the hallway, placed the dirty tray on the food cart, and then positioned the food cart in front of RI #31's room without washing her hands. EI #6 then went into RI #31's room, without sanitizing or washing her hands, and asked the resident about lunch preferences. EI #6 then picked up RI #31's breakfast tray off the bedside table, exited RI #31's room and placed the tray on the food cart. On 2/15/22 at 8:39 AM, EI #6 was asked, how long had she worked at the facility. EI #6 replied, five years. EI #6 was asked, what room did she get the dirty tray out of before going into RI #31's room. EI #6 replied, RI #251's room. EI #6 was asked, when did she sanitize or wash her hands before going into RI #31's room. EI #6 replied, she thought she hit the sanitizer in the room, but she forgot. EI #6 was asked, what was the risk of not washing or sanitizing her hands before going into RI #31's room. EI #6 replied, germs. EI #6 was asked, should she have sanitized or washed her hands before going into RI #31's room. EI #6 replied, yes, always. EI #6 was asked, what was the policy on washing hands before going into a resident room. EI #6 replied, to sanitize or wash your hands before going into a room. On 2/17/22 at 8:13 AM, an interview was conducted with EI #2 RN, Infection Preventionist. EI #2 was asked, how long had she worked there. EI #2 replied, about a year and a half. EI #2 was asked, how often was staff trained on washing or sanitizing their hands. EI #2 replied, on hire, annually and as needed, group or individual, verbal or one on one. EI #2 was asked, what was the policy on washing hands when picking up a dirty tray from a resident's room and then putting it on the cart and entering another resident's room. EI #2 replied, they should sanitize before entering another residents room. EI #2 was asked, when should staff pick up a dirty tray and put it on the food cart and enter another resident's room without sanitizing their hands. EI #2 replied, never. EI #2 was asked, what was the risk of not washing their hands after picking up a dirty tray and entering another resident's room. EI #2 replied, cross contamination. EI #2 was asked, when should staff serving trays in the dining room with gloves on change them. EI #2 replied, between each resident. EI #2 was asked, what was the risk of not changing gloves in between residents when in the dining room serving trays. EI #2 replied, cross contamination. A review of the policy titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Equipment with an effective date of March 2020 revealed: Policy: Resident-care equipment can be a source of indirect transmission of pathogens. Reusable resident-care equipment will be cleaned and disinfected in accordance with current CDC recommendations in order to break the chain of infection. RI #250 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 02/15/22 06:50 PM EI #4 was observed to assess vital signs for RI #250 and then place the used pulse oximeter and the thermometer in her pocket. On 2/15/22 at 7:18 PM, an Interview was conducted with EI #4, LPN. EI #4 was asked, how long had she worked there. EI #4 replied, two going on three years. EI #4 was asked, where had she placed the pulse oximeter and the thermometer. EI #4 replied, in her pocket. EI #4 was asked, was the thermometer and the pulse oximeter dirty. EI #4 replied, yes. EI #4 was asked, should she put the dirty thermometer and the pulse oximeter in her pocket. EI #4 replied, no. EI #4 was asked, what was the risk of putting a dirty pulse oximeter and thermometer in her pocket. EI #4 replied, bacteria or infection. On 2/17/22 at 10:47 AM, an interview was conducted with EI #1 RN. Director of Nursing (DON). EI #1 was asked, when should equipment be placed in nurse's pocket. EI #1 replied, equipment should not be in the pocket. EI #1 was asked, why not. EI #1 replied, infection control. EI #1 was asked, when should staff change gloves while serving meals in the dining room. EI #1 replied, after each resident. EI #1 was asked, when should staff sanitize hands while picking up dirty trays from resident rooms. EI #1 replied, in between each resident before going to the next room. EI #1 was asked, what harm was there in not sanitizing between residents while picking up trays on units. EI #1 replied, possibly infection control.
Jun 2019 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, medical record review, interview and review of a facility policy titled, Clean Dressing Change, the facili...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, medical record review, interview and review of a facility policy titled, Clean Dressing Change, the facility failed to ensure a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Wound Nurse, Employee Identifier (EI) #2, washed her hands and put on clean gloves after cleaning the sacral wound and prior to applying Silvermed Hydrogel (wound treatment gel) to the wound bed during the provision of wound care for Resident Identifier (RI) #43 on 06/05/2019. This affected RI #43, one of two sampled residents observed during the provision of wound care. Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Clean Dressing Change with an implementation date of April 2019, revealed: .Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide wound care in a manner to decrease potential for infection and/or cross contamination .12. Cleanse the wound as ordered .13. Wash hands and put on clean gloves. 14 .topical ointments or creams . RI #43 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Adult Failure to Thrive. A review of RI #43's Physician Order List, dated 06/04/2019, revealed: .CLEAN SACRAL WOUND EVERY 3 DAYS WITH NORMAL SALINE PAT DRY WITH GAUZE. APPLY SILVER HYDROGEL TO WOUND AND COVER WITH SILICONE FOAM DRESSING . On 06/05/2019 at 3:22 PM, the surveyor observed EI #2 perform RI #43's wound care. EI #2 washed her hands and put on clean gloves. EI #2 cleaned RI #43's sacral wound with normal saline and gauze. Without removing her gloves, washing her hands or applying new gloves, EI #2 applied the Silvermed Hydrogel to the wound with a cotton tipped applicator. On 06/05/2019 at 3:50 PM, an interview was conducted with EI #2. The surveyor asked EI #2, after she cleaned the wound, were her gloves clean or dirty. EI #2 replied dirty. The surveyor asked EI #2 did she wash her hands and change her gloves after she cleaned the wound and prior to applying the Silvermed Hydrogel. EI #2 replied no. On 06/06/19 at 2:35 PM, a follow up interview was conducted with EI#2. The surveyor asked EI #2 why should she wash her hands after cleaning a wound. EI#2 replied because the wound was dirty and that was the standard of practice. The surveyor asked EI #2 what problems could it cause the resident by not washing her hands and changing her gloves. EI #2 replied it could cause infection.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (83/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Alabama.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Alabama facilities.
  • • Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Fairview At Redstone Village's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns FAIRVIEW AT REDSTONE VILLAGE an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Alabama, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Fairview At Redstone Village Staffed?

CMS rates FAIRVIEW AT REDSTONE VILLAGE's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 29%, compared to the Alabama average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Fairview At Redstone Village?

State health inspectors documented 3 deficiencies at FAIRVIEW AT REDSTONE VILLAGE during 2019 to 2022. These included: 3 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Fairview At Redstone Village?

FAIRVIEW AT REDSTONE VILLAGE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 56 certified beds and approximately 53 residents (about 95% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in HUNTSVILLE, Alabama.

How Does Fairview At Redstone Village Compare to Other Alabama Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Alabama, FAIRVIEW AT REDSTONE VILLAGE's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (29%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Fairview At Redstone Village?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Fairview At Redstone Village Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, FAIRVIEW AT REDSTONE VILLAGE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Alabama. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Fairview At Redstone Village Stick Around?

Staff at FAIRVIEW AT REDSTONE VILLAGE tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 29%, the facility is 17 percentage points below the Alabama average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.

Was Fairview At Redstone Village Ever Fined?

FAIRVIEW AT REDSTONE VILLAGE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Fairview At Redstone Village on Any Federal Watch List?

FAIRVIEW AT REDSTONE VILLAGE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.