ROCKET CITY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER

105 TEAKWOOD DRIVE SW, HUNTSVILLE, AL 35801 (256) 881-5000
For profit - Limited Liability company 159 Beds VENZA CARE MANAGEMENT Data: November 2025 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#214 of 223 in AL
Last Inspection: February 2023

Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.

Overview

Rocket City Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center in Huntsville, Alabama, has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's quality and care. With a state rank of #214 out of 223, it is in the bottom half of nursing homes in Alabama and #10 out of 12 in Madison County, meaning only two local options are worse. The situation appears to be worsening, with issues increasing from 7 in 2021 to 12 in 2023. Staffing is relatively strong with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars, although turnover is alarmingly high at 77%, compared to the state average of 48%. The facility has incurred $15,593 in fines, which is concerning as it is higher than 83% of other Alabama facilities, suggesting ongoing compliance problems. While the center does provide better RN coverage than 92% of state facilities, there are serious incidents reported, including a failure to develop a care plan for a resident smoking and vaping unsupervised inside the facility, which poses risks to all residents. Additionally, the Quality Assurance committee did not adequately monitor laundry for safety hazards related to smoking, further endangering resident safety. Overall, families should weigh these significant weaknesses against the few strengths before making a decision.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Alabama
#214/223
Bottom 5%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
7 → 12 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
77% turnover. Very high, 29 points above average. Constant new faces learning your loved one's needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
$15,593 in fines. Lower than most Alabama facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 60 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Alabama nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
⚠ Watch
20 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2021: 7 issues
2023: 12 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Alabama average (2.9)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 77%

31pts above Alabama avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $15,593

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: VENZA CARE MANAGEMENT

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is very high (77%)

29 points above Alabama average of 48%

The Ugly 20 deficiencies on record

3 life-threatening
Feb 2023 12 deficiencies 3 IJ (3 facility-wide)
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, resident record review, and review of a facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, the ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, resident record review, and review of a facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan with person-centered safety interventions addressing Resident Identifier (RI) #27's noncompliance with the facility's non-smoking policy, including smoking and vaping inside the facility unsupervised in his/her room from 11/15/2022 through 02/13/2023. Facility staff did not know what to do or how to respond on occasions when RI #27 was found using a vape or smoking in his/her room. This failure affected RI #27, one of 23 sampled residents for whom care plans were reviewed. In addition, this failure placed all 109 residents residing in the facility at risk for immediate jeopardy, as it was likely to result in serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. On 02/24/2023 at 5:05 PM, the facility's Administrator, Employee Identifier (EI) #1 and the [NAME] President (VP) of Clinical Operations, EI #36, were provided a copy of the immediate jeopardy template and notified of the immediate jeopardy findings in the area of Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan, F656-Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plans. Findings include: A review of the policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, reviewed 04/14/2021, revealed: . POLICY STATEMENT A person-centered Comprehensive Care Plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident. .GUIDELINE: . 4. Each resident's Comprehensive Care plan is designed to: a. Incorporate identified problem areas; b. Incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems . RI #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Depression, Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Muscle Weakness, Lack of Coordination, Seizures, and Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) affecting Dominant Side. During the survey, document review and interviews with staff revealed RI #27 had multiple documented episodes of non-compliance with the facility's non-smoking policy, including vaping and smoking in his/her room and hiding vaping and smoking materials from facility staff. This noncompliance was documented to have occurred from 11/15/2022 through 02/13/2023, despite repeated education to RI #27 on the facility's non-smoking policy. Cross reference F689 and F867. Review of RI #27's comprehensive care plans revealed the first care plan related to RI #27's noncompliance was created on 01/26/2023 by EI #15, the MDS/Care Plan Coordinator. This care plan documented: .Problem Start Date: 01/26/2023 Category: Behavioral Resident demonstrates non-compliance with physician orders and/or plan of care as evidenced by: continuing to vape in (his/her) room despite being asked not to . On 01/26/2023 at 3:57 PM, EI #15, the MDS/Care Plan Coordinator, was interviewed. When asked at what point RI #27 first demonstrated noncompliant behavior, EI #15 said since 11/15/2023, according to the progress notes. When asked what had been done to address the concern of noncompliance with the facility's non-smoking policy, EI #15 said they offered a nicotine patch, but RI #27 continued to vape, so the patch was discontinued. EI #15 confirmed RI #27's care plan addressing non-compliance with the facility's non-smoking policy was not initiated until 01/26/2023. When asked why a care plan had not been developed prior, EI #15 said she thought progress notes were effective enough. When asked when a care plan should have been initiated, EI #15 said on 11/15/2023, when RI #27's noncompliance was first noted. EI #15 said the risk of not developing a care plan would be harm to the resident. EI #15 further stated the facility policy for person-centered care plans had not been followed. On 01/26/2023 at 4:46 PM an interview was conducted with EI #2, Director of Nursing (DON). EI #2 was asked, what was the smoking/vaping policy for the facility. EI #2 said the facility was non-smoking, meaning no smoking or vapes were allowed. EI #2 was asked when she first became aware of RI #27 vaping in his/her room. EI #2 replied, she could not remember the exact date, but indicated they notified the doctor and got RI #27 a nicotine patch. However, EI #2 said RI #27 continued to use a vape, so they had to discontinue the nicotine patch. When asked what interventions were put in place to address RI #27's noncompliance after the nicotine patch was discontinued, EI #2 said she did not think they did anything different. EI #2 was asked when a care plan should have been put in place. EI #2 said immediately after finding the vape. When asked why that was not done, EI #2 said EI #15, the MDS/Care Plan Coordinator, did not do it. EI #2 further stated the facility policy for person-centered care plans had not been followed. On 02/18/2023 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor conducted another interview with EI #2, the DON. When asked what interventions were currently in place to address RI #27's noncompliance with the facility's non-smoking policy, EI #2 said they were offering snacks of choice, a smoke detector in RI #27's room (initiated 02/13/2023), and an in-room sitter for RI #27 (initiated on 02/15/2023). EI #2 said prior interventions had not prevented RI #27 from continuing to be noncompliant, but indicated they had had no further instances since 02/13/2023. An interview was conducted with EI #6, the Medical Director, on 02/19/2023 at 2:30 PM. EI #6 indicated he participated in a discussion in December 2022 regarding interventions that may help address RI #27's noncompliance with the facility's non-smoking policy. EI #6 said he did not recall making any suggestions, but they were trying to come up with options. EI #6 said the nicotine patch was discontinued due to RI #27 continuing to vape, and indicated medications for smoking cessation were not an option for RI #27. When asked what the facility could have done about RI #27 continuing to violate the facility's non-smoking policy, EI #6 said there were really only two options: one being to change the policy, which was not a good idea, or to find alternate placement that would be a better fit. EI #6 indicated that after multiple violations of the facility's non-smoking policy, they should have discussed transferring RI #27 out of the facility for his/her own well-being, as well as for the safety of others in the facility. When asked what approaches could have been attempted to prevent the continued noncompliance, EI #6 said they could have initiated the one on one (in-room sitter) sooner. An interview was conducted with EI #1, the Administrator, on 02/17/2022 at 1:39 PM. EI #1 stated the facility had a meeting in December 2022 to discuss the concern of RI #27's noncompliance with the facility's non-smoking policy. However, when asked if they had discussed a need for a care plan addressing these continued behaviors, EI #1 said she did not recall discussing a care plan. EI #1 further stated she did not remember anyone saying RI #27 would need a care plan in place for his/her behavior of noncompliance related to smoking and vaping. EI #1 acknowledged the facility had a breakdown in the care plan process, and said the facility was not aware there no care plan addressing RI #27's noncompliance until it was brought to the facility's attention during the survey. This deficiency was cited as a result of complaint/report numbers AL00043096 and AL00043372. ****************** The facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan on 02/26/2023 for F656 that outlined the following: 1. Comprehensive Care Plan education was provided by SCC (Signature Care Consultant) on 01/25/2023 to DON, the MDS coordinator & each department manager responsible for MDS assessments/evaluations upon admission, quarterly, annually & with significant change. Care Planning residents with behaviors education was completed on 01/25/2023 by the Special Projects MDS RN and on 02/25/2023 by the VPCO (Vice President of Clinical Operations) to the DON, MDS coordinator & each department manager responsible for MDS assessments/evaluations upon admission, quarterly, annually & with significant change. The facility developed a care plan on 01/26/2023 for behaviors non-compliant with physician orders and facility policies as evidenced by vaping in her room. The facility updated the plan of care continually with appropriate interventions to address noncompliance with the facility's nonsmoking policy with person-centered safety interventions for RI #27 for noncompliance with the facility's nonsmoking policy. The following are the revisions and interventions to R#27's plan of care: -Vape materials were confiscated, and a nicotine patch was ordered on 11/24/2022. - The Administrator discussed non-compliant behavior in violation of facility policy with R#27 on 02/22/2023 and is documented in the progress note. - A room search was completed on 02/18/2023 and documented in the progress notes with R#27's consent and she was present. - Social Services Director (SSD) educated R#27 on the non-smoking policy 02/22/2023, RI#27 signed the Smoke Free/Non-Smoking policy and was given a copy and a copy was uploaded into the Matrix medical record. - Laundry staff continue to monitor resident clothing and personal items for any burn holes. All Laundry staff was educated by the housekeeping supervisor on 02/21/2023. All housekeeping staff and the HCSG (Healthcare Services Group) housekeeping supervisor were educated by the HCSG (Healthcare Services group) District manager for Housekeeping and Laundry on 02/25/2023. The education included how to audit resident personal laundry for burn holes, soot, or tears and report their findings to the laundry supervisor. - Education to a friend on 12/7/2022 by a staff nurse on not bringing vape or smoke materials into the facility. - Psych referral for non-compliant behavior and evaluation on 1/11/2023, and 12/28/2022. - Collaboration with DHR and Gateway for discharge planning on 12/30/2022, 01/17/2023, 2/6/2023, 2/7/2023, 2/13/2023, 2/15/2023, and 2/16/2023. - Provide snacks as a diversion to smoking on 01/27/2023. - Education to family (Father) by SSD on 02/13/2023 on the non-smoking facility policy and not bringing vape or smoke materials into the facility. - Maintenance placed a smoke detector in the room on 02/13/2023. - 1:1 supervision implemented 02/15/2023 and continues. - 30-day Discharge planning initiated 02/15/2023. 2. All residents residing in the facility were at a safety risk and fire hazard due to a lack of appropriate safety measures developed for residents with noncompliance on the plan of care. All staff in all departments were interviewed by the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) on 02/17/2023, 02/18/2023, and 02/19/2023 to identify any other residents with behaviors that are non-compliant with the Facility Smoking/Non-Smoking Policy facility. Any resident identified with non-compliant behavior to the Facility Smoking/Non-Smoking policy has a behavior monitoring plan and care planned and implemented. - All residents were interviewed by a member of the interdisciplinary team (IDT) the interdisciplinary team consisted of the SSD, DON, Admissions Liaison, Admissions Coordinator, Life Enrichment Director, SDC, ADON, Unit Manager, Medical Records, and MDS coordinator. These were completed on 02/21/2023 on smoking choices. - Five residents were identified as a smoker or requesting to smoke met with the SSD and signed the Non-Smoking policy. This was completed on 02/21/2023. - Any resident identified as a smoker or requesting to smoke have behavior monitoring implemented observing for any non-compliant behaviors related to not smoking/vaping in the facility and the plan of care revised with approaches and interventions to monitor and manage those residents' behaviors. This was completed on 02/21/2023. - The Interdisciplinary team consisting of the DON, SSD, Administrator, Life Enrichment Director, Signature Care Consultant (SCC), and [NAME] President of Clinical Operations (VPCO) completed an Interdisciplinary Psychotropic review/Behavior meeting on 02/17/2023 and 02/18/2023 to identify and discuss residents displaying challenging behaviors, as well as those residents receiving psychoactive medications. Residents with behavior issues have Target Behaviors identified on the EMAR for documentation. Behavior management care plans were reviewed to evaluate goals and the effectiveness of the interventions and revised as necessary. 3. Comprehensive Care Plan education was provided by SCC (Signature Care Consultant) on 01/25/2023 to DON, the MDS coordinator & each department manager responsible for MDS assessments/evaluations upon admission, quarterly, annually & with significant change. This education focused on care plans are ongoing and revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition or behavior change. The nurse/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the review and updating of care plans. The care plan should reflect the current status of the resident and be updated with changes in the resident's status: a. When there has been a significant change in the resident's condition. b. Changing goals. c. When the desired outcome is not met. d. When the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and e. At least quarterly - Care Planning residents with behaviors was completed on 01/25/2023 by the Special Projects MDS RN and on 02/25/2023 by the VPCO (Vice President of Clinical Operations) to the DON, MDS coordinator & each department manager responsible for MDS assessments/evaluations upon admission, quarterly, annually & with significant change. This education focused on care plans are ongoing and revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition or behavior change. The nurse/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the review and updating of care plans. The care plan should reflect the current status of the resident and be updated with changes in the resident's status: a. When there has been a significant change in the resident's condition. b. Changing goals. c. When the desired outcome is not met. d. When the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and e. At least quarterly The Governing Body consisting of the Chief Nursing Officer (CNO), Senior [NAME] President of Operations (SVPO), Senior [NAME] President (SVPC), [NAME] President Operations (VPO), and [NAME] President of Clinical Operations (VPCO) reviewed and granted the approval of the Comprehensive Care Plans policy on 01/25/2023 created on 04/06/2015, revised last on 07/19/2018, and reviewed 04/14/2021 by the Senior Clinical Leadership team consisting of the Chief Nursing Officer (CNO), Senior [NAME] President of Clinical Operations (SVPCO), [NAME] President of Regulatory (VPR), and the [NAME] President of Operations (VPO). - The Comprehensive care Plan policy was in-serviced at the Signature Whitesburg Gardens on 01/25/2023 by the Signature Care Consultant (SCC) to the to DON, the MDS coordinator & each department manager responsible for MDS assessments/evaluations. The VPCO trained the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 02/20/2023 on the Comprehensive Care Plan policy. The VPCO educated the Comprehensive Care Plan policy to the following disciplines on 02/25/2023: Staff Development Coordinator (SDC), ADON, DON, Department Managers for Housekeeping, Maintenance, Dietary, Admissions, Social Services, Business Office, Life Enrichment and/ or Administrator. - The VPCO reviewed the Comprehensive Care Plan policy and prepared and reviewed the training for staff on Comprehensive Care Plans policy on 02/24/2023. - In-servicing will be completed on 02/26/2023 with all LPNs, RNs, MACs, and C.N.A.s, therapy, and all department managers by the SDC, VPCO, and/or department manager. This education focused on care plans are ongoing and revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition or behavior change. The nurse/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the review and updating of care plans. The care plan should reflect the current status of the resident and be updated with changes in the resident's status: a. When there has been a significant change in the resident's condition. b. Changing goals. c. When the desired outcome is not met. d. When the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and e. At least quarterly - The Director of Nursing (DON) provides oversight five days a week to the nurse/Interdisciplinary Team to ensure care plans are reviewed and updated with changes. - The DON was educated on of DON responsibilities in providing oversight to the nurse/Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to ensure care plans are reviewed and updated with changes and re-educated on 02/24/2023 by the VPCO. ****************** On 02/26/2023 at 11:15 PM, after review of the information provided in the facility's Removal Plan, in-service/education records, as well as staff interviews, and observations, the survey team determined the facility implemented the immediate corrective actions as of 02/26/2023 and the scope and severity was lowered to an F level, to allow the facility time to further address and monitor the deficient practice in order to achieve compliance.
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** ***************************************************************** The facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan on 02/26/202...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** ***************************************************************** The facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan on 02/26/2023 for F689 that outlined the following: 1. The facility developed a person-centered care plan for non-compliant behaviors with vaping on 01/26/2023, implemented interventions to manage non-compliant vaping behaviors on 11/15/2022, and revised the plan of care to address smoking cigarettes in her room on 02/13/2023 by placing a smoke detector in her room and placing her on 1:1 monitoring on 02/15/2023. RI#27's plan of care has non-compliance with smoking cigarettes in her room added to the care plan problem and approaches and interventions added to the care plan to guide the staff on how to respond if RI #27 was found smoking or vaping. Approaches and interventions that guide staff on how to respond are as follows: 1 on 1 monitoring, Facility staff may confiscate items or substances identified to post a risk to resident's health and safety and are in plain view, observe for triggers of inappropriate behaviors and alter environment as needed, Observe for unmet needs such as for toileting, rest, food, fluids, companionship, etc., Offer smoking succession such as nicotine patch or other alternative, Resident room and belonging searches with resident or family consent PRN, and Social Services met with resident and residents signed and verbalizes understanding of facility NO SMOKING POLICY. 2. All residents residing in the facility were at a safety risk and fire hazard due to a lack of appropriate safety measures developed for residents with noncompliance on the plan of care. The following Immediate actions were taken to address nonsmoking policies and procedures, including developing care plans, and staff training on how to address the noncompliance of residents. The following immediate actions were taken for all residents in the facility so they will no longer be at risk of ongoing safety concerns and/or fire hazards. - All staff in all departments were interviewed by the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) on 02/17/2023, 02/18/2023, and 02/19/2023 to identify any other residents with behaviors that are non-compliant with the non-smoking facility policy. Any resident identified with non-compliant behavior to the Facility Smoking/ Non-Smoking facility policy has a behavior monitoring plan and care planned and implemented. - All residents were interviewed by a member of the interdisciplinary team (IDT) the interdisciplinary team consisted of the SSD, DON, Admissions Liaison, Admissions Coordinator, Life Enrichment Director, SDC, ADON, Unit Manager, Medical Records, and MDS coordinator. These were completed on 02/21/2023 on smoking choices. - Five residents have signed the Smoke Free/Non-Smoking policy and have behavior monitoring and care plans for smoking. Any resident identified as a smoker or requesting to smoke met with the SSD and signed the Non-Smoking policy. This was completed on 02/21/2023. - Any resident identified as a smoker or requesting to smoke has behavior monitoring implemented to monitor for any non-compliant behaviors related to not smoking/vaping in the facility and the plan of care revised with approaches and interventions to monitor and manage those residents' behaviors. This was completed on 02/21/2023. - The Interdisciplinary team consisting of the DON, SSD, Administrator, Life Enrichment Director, Signature Care Consultant (SCC), and [NAME] President of Clinical Operations (VPCO) completed an Interdisciplinary Psychotropic review/Behavior meeting on 02/17/2023 and 02/18/2023 to identify and discuss residents displaying challenging behaviors, as well as those residents receiving psychoactive medications. Residents with behavior issues have Target Behaviors identified on the EMAR for documentation. Behavior management care plans were reviewed to evaluate goals and the effectiveness of the interventions and revised as necessary. 3. The following actions were taken to address non-compliance with the Facility's Smoking/Non-Smoking Policy and procedures, including implementing individualized interventions in the care plan for noncompliance with smoking policies. All Staff in all departments had training on how to address noncompliance of residents with the Facility Smoking/Non-Smoking Policy and Contraband Discovery Policy. The following disciplines have been educated by the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC), ADON, DON, Department Manager, and/ or Administrator on the following: - On 11/11/2022 nine licensed nurses were in-serviced on the Facility's Smoking/Non- Smoking facility policy and non-compliant behaviors by the ADON. - On 12/07/2022 the Signature Care Consultant (SCC) educated the interdisciplinary team consisting of the MDS coordinator, DON, Administrator, RSM, facility liaison, Plant Ops Director, BOM, HCSG Housekeeping Manager, SDC, ABOM, and 19 nursing staff on the Abuse policy, and residents with non-compliant smoking behaviors. - On 12/29/2022 the Administrator educated 42 staff from different departments in a Town Hall Meeting on reporting behaviors of residents and staff, the Code of Conduct/Ethics, and the Facility Smoking/ Non-Smoking policy. - On 01/25/2023 the Special Projects MDS Coordinator in-serviced the ADON, DON, SSD, MDSC, and Life Enrichment Director on care planning residents with behaviors. - On 01/25/2023 13 licensed nurses were in-serviced on notifying the DON of residents with behavioral issues by the ADON and/or SDC. - On 02/15/2023 all staff in all departments were in-serviced on the Facility Smoking/ Non-Smoking policy by the SDC and/or ADON. - On 02/15/2023 all staff in all departments were in-serviced on the 1:1 Sitter/Care process by the ADON. This in-servicing educated the procedure for staff if they find a resident smoking, drinking alcohol, or engaging in behavior that could lead to harm, ensure safety, remove the contraband, do not leave the resident alone, and notify administration immediately. - On 02/20/2023 all staff in all departments were in-serviced on the Behavioral Health Policy. This included documentation of behaviors in Matrix POC by C.N.A.s, target behavior documentation by licensed nurses in the MAR/TAR, reporting behaviors to the Administration, SSD, and the DON, and the monthly interdisciplinary behavior meeting. The education included but was not limited to identifying and managing non-compliant behaviors, documentation of behaviors in EMR, and documentation from CNA/QMA in POC on daily tasks. In-servicing about identifying and managing noncompliant behaviors was specific to the Contraband Discovery policy and included the following: 1. If facility staff identify items or substances that pose risks to residents' health and safety and are in plain view, they may confiscate them. 2. Facility staff should not conduct searches of a resident or their personal belongings, unless the resident, or resident representative agrees to a voluntary search and understands the reason for the search. 3. Obtain consent from resident and/or resident representative to search resident's body or personal possessions. Only after facility obtains consent from resident and/or resident representative. 4. Inform the resident and/or resident representative that he/she and/or his/her room will be searched and the reason for the search. Give the resident the opportunity to surrender the suspected contraband and to the extent possible, give the resident the opportunity to be present during the search. 5. Remove any items that could pose a potential threat or cause harm to other residents or staff. 6. Searches will be carried out by the Administrator, Director of Nursing Services, Social Services Director or Charge nurse and at least one (1) other staff member. 7. If the resident has a roommate, only the resident's side of the room shall be searched. 8. The Administrator and/or Director of Nursing Services will hold the contraband in a locked and secure place until arrangements can be made for appropriate disposal with either corporate or regulatory agencies. Any illegal substances will be turned over to law enforcement authorities by the Administrator or designee, as soon as possible. - The SDC, DON ADM ,SSD, SDC, ADON were trained on the Behavior Health Management Procedure and Contraband Discovery policy by the VPCO on 02/20/2023. - Residents identified with behaviors will be referred to SSD, MD, and IDT to determine if a need for additional psychotherapy, outpatient services, 1:1, or discharge planning is required. This was completed by the SDC. - On 02/20/2023 all nurses were educated on the 24-Hour Report policy to review how communication is provided from nursing and direct care staff to administration by the SDC. - The 24-Hour Report policy training is specific to communicating the following: The 24-hour report is used to provide communication to nursing, administration, and direct care departments regarding pertinent changes in residents' status. Licensed nurses will place residents on the 24-hour nursing report form if they meet the criteria noted below: Admissions, re-admissions, discharges or transfers , Injuries, Incidents (elopement, falls without injury, medication errors and reactions), Acute changes of behavior, mental status or physical condition, Skin changes (rashes, pressure ulcers, bruises, skin tears), Abnormal laboratory or x-ray findings, Episodic illnesses, flu, infection, UTI, URI. 1. A 24-Hour Nursing Report will be used at each unit. 2. A new form will be initiated daily. 3. The Director of Nursing (DON)/designee will collect the original form each morning and leave the copy on the unit for follow-up. 4. The DON/designee will review the 24-Hour Nursing Report at the daily clinical meeting. 5. The DON/designee will use the 24-Hour Nursing Report on daily rounds for additional assessment of the resident's clinical condition. 6. The licensed nurse will complete the 24-Hour Nursing Report with the resident's name, room number and brief description of the condition change. Complete documentation is to be placed in the clinical record. The data entered for a specific resident continues for each shift, one resident per row. Multiple forms may be needed for a unit for a 24-hour period. 7. Steps to be taken by the Licensed Nurse: a. Identify a change in condition. b. Notify the M.D. c. Initiate any new orders. d. Notify the family. e. Document in the Nursing Progress Notes. f. Update the Plan of Care as needed. g. Add resident to the 24-Hour Nursing Report - On 2/24/2023, 02/25/2023, and 02/26/2023 all staff in all departments will be educated on the Contraband Discovery policy by the SDC and/or department manager to include how staff will provide any contraband confiscated to the Administrator and/or DON to hold the contraband once confiscated in a locked and secure place until arrangements are made for disposal with corporate or regulatory agencies. - All staff in all departments will be in-serviced on the Behavior Health Policy, Comprehensive Care Plans, Care Plans and Care Plan Meetings Accidents and Incident Investigating Reporting, Contraband Discovery policy, Safety and Supervision of Resident policy, Facility Smoking/Non-Smoking policy, and QAPI by the SDC/ADON/DON/VPCO/Administrator/Department manager/SCC/Charge Nurse by 02/26/2023. - Any staff that has not received in-servicing will be contacted by phone and complete the in-servicing and sign the in-servicing sheet on their next scheduled day. - Any staff member not completing in-servicing by 02/26/2023 in person or via the phone will be removed from the schedule until in-servicing is complete. - All contracted staff will complete in-servicing at the beginning of their first shift with the facility. All in-servicing will be included in the Agency Orientation packet. This in-servicing will be completed by the Charge nurse, ADON, SDC, or DON. - All new Signature staff will be in-serviced and educated during general employee orientation by the SDC or department manager. - The DON is responsible for the oversight of the Behavior Management program to include ensuring behaviors are identified, reported, communicated, monitored, and noncompliance is discussed in meetings, and effective interventions put in place. - The DON was educated on the DON responsibilities ************************************************************** On 02/26/2023 at 11:15 PM, after review of the information provided in the facility's Removal Plan, in-service/education records, as well as staff interviews, and observations, the survey team determined the facility implemented the immediate corrective actions as of 02/26/2023 and the scope and severity was lowered to an F level, to allow the facility time to further address and monitor the deficient practice in order to achieve compliance. Review of RI #27's comprehensive care plans revealed the first care plan related to RI #27's noncompliance was created on 01/26/2023 by EI #15, the MDS/Care Plan Coordinator. This care plan documented: .Problem Start Date: 01/26/2023 Category: Behavioral Resident demonstrates non-compliance with physician orders and/or plan of care as evidenced by: continuing to vape in (his/her) room despite being asked not to . On 01/26/2023 at 3:57 PM, EI #15, the MDS/Care Plan Coordinator, was interviewed. When asked at what point RI #27 first demonstrated noncompliant behavior, EI #15 said since 11/15/2023, according to the progress notes. When asked what had been done to address the concern of noncompliance with the facility's non-smoking policy, EI #15 said they offered a nicotine patch, but RI #27 continued to vape, so the patch was discontinued. EI #15 confirmed RI #27's care plan addressing non-compliance with the facility's non-smoking policy was not initiated until 01/26/2023. When asked why a care plan had not been developed prior, EI #15 said she thought progress notes were effective enough. When asked when a care plan should have been initiated, EI #15 said on 11/15/2023, when RI #27's noncompliance was first noted. EI #15 said the risk of not developing a care plan would be harm to the resident. On 02/18/2023 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with EI #2, the DON. When asked the safety risks associated with RI #27 smoking and vaping in the facility, EI #2 said fire and second hand smoke. When asked what interventions were currently in place to address RI #27's noncompliance with the facility's non-smoking policy, EI #2 said they were offering snacks of choice, a smoke detector in RI #27's room (initiated 02/13/2023), and an in-room sitter for RI #27 (initiated on 02/15/2023). EI #2 said prior interventions had not prevented RI #27 from continuing to be noncompliant, but indicated they had had no further instances since 02/13/2023. On 02/16/2023 at 3:52 PM, a telephone interview was conducted with EI #6, the Medical Director. EI #6 said he was notified in late December 2022 that RI #27 was vaping in the facility and in January 2023 was told it was still occurring. EI #6 was asked, in his medical opinion, what would be the dangers of vaping. EI #6 said there was a danger to people around the vape, just like second hand smoke. EI #6 said there could be chemicals in the vape like a cigarette. EI #6 said neither vapes or cigarettes should be smoked in a building or around other people. A follow-up interview was conducted with EI #6 on 02/19/2023 at 2:30 PM. EI #6 indicated he participated in a discussion in December 2022 regarding interventions that may help address RI #27's noncompliance with the facility's non-smoking policy. EI #6 said he did not recall making any suggestions, but they were trying to come up with options. EI #6 said the nicotine patch was discontinued due to RI #27 continuing to vape, and indicated medications for smoking cessation were not an option for RI #27. When asked what the facility could have done about RI #27 continuing to violate the facility's non-smoking policy, EI #6 said there were really only two options: one being to change the policy, which was not a good idea, or to find alternate placement that would be a better fit. EI #6 indicated that after multiple violations of the facility's non-smoking policy, they should have discussed transferring RI #27 out of the facility for his/her own well-being, as well as for the safety of others in the facility. When asked what approaches could have been attempted to prevent the continued noncompliance, EI #6 said they could have initiated the one on one (in-room sitter) sooner. This deficiency was cited as a result of complaint/report numbers AL00043096 and AL00043372. Based on interviews, record review, review of the facility's RESIDENT HANDBOOK & (and) admission DOCUMENTS, review of an article published by the United States Food and Drug Administration titled E-Cigarettes, Vapes, and Other Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS), and review of two reports to the State Survey Agency via the Alabama Department of Public Health Online Incident Reporting System, the facility failed to develop, implement, and revise effective person-centered safety interventions for Resident Identifier (RI) #27, a resident found to have multiple documented episodes of noncompliance with the facility's non-smoking policy dating back to 11/15/2022, including smoking inside the facility unsupervised and falling asleep with ENDS, also known as vapes, in his/her hand. On 02/06/2023, RI #27 was observed lighting a cigarette in the presence of Employee Identifier (EI) #22, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), who then left the room and the resident unattended to notify EI #23, the Charge Nurse. When the Charge Nurse arrived to RI #27's room, she found a lighter, vape and a pack of cigarettes in RI #27's neck pillow. EI #23 also observed around three to four burned cigarettes in a cup on a table beside RI #27's bed. Seven days later, on 02/13/2023, while providing care, another CNA, EI #24, found a previously lit cigarette in RI #27's bed. EI #24 also found a cup on RI #27's over-the-bed table containing ashes and approximately three to five cigarette butts RI #27's behavioral care plan was not created until 01/26/2023, and did not address smoking cigarettes or provide guidance to staff on how to respond if RI #27 was found smoking or vaping. This deficient practice placed all 109 residents residing in the facility in immediate jeopardy, as it was likely to result in serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. On 02/24/2023 at 5:05 PM, the facility's Administrator, Employee Identifier (EI) #1 and the [NAME] President (VP) of Clinical Operations, EI #36, were provided a copy of the immediate jeopardy template and notified of the findings of substandard quality of care at the immediate jeopardy level in the area of Quality of Care, F689-Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices. The immediate jeopardy began on 11/15/2022 and continued until 02/26/2023. Findings include: Cross Reference F656 and F867. On 01/18/2023, the State Survey Agency received an anonymous complaint via the Alabama Department of Public Health Online Incident Reporting System. This report indicated the facility was non-smoking, but RI #27 had fallen asleep while vaping and had 30 plus vapes and cigarettes confiscated. The complainant indicated these thing had been reported to the Administrator, EI #1, and the Director of Nursing (DON), EI #2, but nothing had been done. On 02/15/2023, the State Survey Agency received a second anonymous complaint via the Alabama Department of Public Health Online Incident Reporting System. This report indicated RI #27 was smoking in his/her room. The report further indicated RI #27 had cigarettes and a lighter, which was recently found in his/her pillow case and taken away. The complainant alleged these concerns were reported to EI #1, the Administrator, and EI #2, the DON, but RI #27 continued to smoke in his/her room. Review of an undated article published by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) titled E-Cigarettes, Vapes, and Other Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS), revealed the following: .E-cigarette Problems and Potential Violations There are no safe tobacco products, including ENDS. In addition to exposing people to risks of tobacco-related disease and death, FDA has received reports from the public about safety problems associated with vaping products including: Overheating, fires, and explosions Lung injuries Seizures and other neurological symptoms . These problems can seriously hurt the person using the ENDS product and others around them. The facility's RESIDENT HANDBOOK & admission DOCUMENTS, revised 08/01/2021, documented the following: . Certain Items Are Not Allowed In Your Room, Ever. Any type of smoking or vaping materials or items, including lighters. Smoking Our Facility is (a) smoke-free facility . RI #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Depression, Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Muscle Weakness, Lack of Coordination, Seizures, and Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) affecting Dominant Side. RI #27's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date of 12/22/2022, revealed RI #27 scored a 14 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating he/she was cognitively intact. A review of RI #27's Resident Progress Notes revealed the following entries were made by EI #17, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) providing care for RI #27 on the 6 AM - 6 PM shift: . 11/15/2022 8:40 (8:40 AM) . While returning to resident's room to update (him/her) on (his/her) labs staff discovered (him/her) with a vape in (his/her) hand. (He/She) quickly attempted to tuck it into the folds of (his/her) arms but handed it over, without any issues, when staff requested the vape. Staff notified DON of issue at 8:39 AM. Currently awaiting any instruction for further action . 11/15/2022 13:33 (1:33 PM) .Upon entering room staff noticed an orange object in resident's left hand. When asked to show staff (his/her) hands resident attempted to hide the object underneath (him/her). (He/She) eventually grabbed the object after staff asked three times and staff noticed it was another vape. Staff confiscated another vape for the second time today, notifying DON and administrator. After confiscating first vape staff was instructed to notify (Medical Director, EI #6) of resident smoking in (his/her) room and to request order for Nicorette patches or gum. MD notified but no response has been received . 11/15/2022 16:44 (4:44 PM) Resident was under the impression that (he/she) would be able to go outside to smoke. Staff informed resident that, per administrator, the facility is 100% smoke free and (he/she is) unable to go outside to smoke. (He/She) informed staff that (he/she) had cigarettes in (his/her) room in addition to the two vapes that were confiscated earlier during the shift. (He/She) surrendered (his/her) cigarettes without and (any) issues but told staff that (he/she) wants to be able to have them back when (he/she) goes out for doctor's appointments or with family. Staff informed (him/her) that (his/her) request would be discussed with management . 11/19/2022 11:49 (11:49 AM) .Resident was asleep in bed and unable to (be) awakened. Staff noticed vape cartridge in resident's hand as (he/she) slept. Attempted to awaken resident to request the vape and re-enforce no smoking policy. Due to failed attempts to awaken resident staff managed to remove vape form (from) resident's hand as (he/she) slept. After confiscating vape staff notified DON and administrator of the issue at hand . 11/24/2022 12:07 (12:07 PM) Offgoing nurse informed staff of resident vaping in room prior to shift change . Staff informed MD (medical doctor) of resident's continued vaping . 11/29/2022 14:30 (2:30 PM) Staff went to respond to resident's call light. Upon entering resident's room staff found (RI #27) sitting on the edge of (his/her) bed vaping. Resident did not notice staff until (he/she) was asked to hand over the vape. Resident asked staff to let (him/her) keep the vape. (He/She) was informed, once again, that Signature Healthcare is a smoke free facility. (He/She) then asked if staff could pretend she didn't catch vaping and just allow (him/her) to put it away. Staff informed (RI #27) that we could not do that and the vape must be taken and reported. (He/She) handed staff the vape without any issues . After leaving resident's room staff reported to DON . 12/07/2022 13:50 (1:50 PM) Resident had a visitor earlier during the shift. Staff noticed (RI #27) completing a list of things that (he/she) wanted (his/her) guest to purchase for (him/her). After the guest exited (RI #27's) room nursing staff introduced herself and asked for the guests name. (RI #27's guest) was educated on the no smoking policy being enforced at the facility and explained that guests are not allowed to bring cigarettes or vapes into the facility on resident's behalf. She stated that she does not ''buy those kinds of things. I only buy (him/her) snacks, drinks and other junk food. Several hours later staff found a vape in (RI #27's) top bedside drawer tucked inside a sock. Vape was handed to the administrator who informed staff to take another peek while (he/she is) not in (his/her) room to see if (he/she) had any other vaping devices. After inspecting resident's room further staff found a brown paper bag containing four more vaping devices. The brown bag was turned into DON before resident returned to (his/her) room . 12/21/2022 9:06 (9:06 AM) During morning med pass staff entered resident's room to find (him/her) asleep with a vaping device in (his/her) hand. Staff attempted to awaken resident to administer medications and remove vape from resident's room. However, after several attempts, resident continued sleeping. Staff removed vaping device from resident's hand and allowed (him/her) to continue resting undisturbed . 12/27/2022 10:55 (10:55 AM) . Upon entering resident's room (he/she) quickly tucked something inside (his/her) gown. When asked if (he/she) was vaping (he/she) immediately said no. But, when asked to remove the object (he/she) had just hidden, (he/she) removed a vaping device from the roll of (his/her) gown. Staff removed vape and reported the event to DON and administrator . 12/27/22 16:28 (4:28 PM) Upon entering resident's room staff found (him/her) with a vape in (his/her) hand. Staff held out hand for (him/her) to hand it over. (He/She) complied but became belligerent . Staff took the second vape today to the DON and reported what had transpired . 12/28/2022 15:00 (3:00 PM) (EI #31), CNA, went into resident's room and discovered (him/her) in bed with a vaping device. She confiscated the vape and turned it in to the administrator . 12/31/2022 16:12 (4:12 PM) Staff found resident sleeping with vape on (his/her) stomach during morning med pass. Vape removed from (his/her) possession and DON notified of findings . 01/05/2023 11:48 (11:48 AM) Resident found sleeping with vape in (his/her) hand this morning when staff went into (his/her) room during med pass . 01/14/2023 9:48 (9:48 AM) During morning med pass resident was found asleep with a vape in (his/her) hand. (He/She) handed it to staff without any issues. Within an hour staff went into the room . While passing (RI #27's) bed staff noticed (him/her) asleep with another vape in (his/her) hand. Staff called out to (him/her) to ask (him/her) to hand over the vape. (He/She) then stated Why did you come back in here to bother me again? Staff explained that while providing care to (his/her) roommate another vape was spotted in (his/her) hand when glancing at (him/her). (He/She) then stated Well don't look at me then. I can't afford to keep buying these things. (He/She) handed staff the second vape without any issues. Findings were reported to DON and administrator . 01/19/2023 9:06 (9:06 AM) During morning med pass staff saw a vaping device inside of (RI #27's) neck pillow. (He/She) handed staff the device without any issues. Vape turned in to DON . 01/19/2023 17:41 (5:41 PM) Second vaping device removed from resident's room prior to shift change . On 02/19/2023 at 9:05 AM, an interview was conducted with EI #17. EI #17 said 11/15/2022 was the first time she recalled seeing RI #27 with a vape. EI #17 confirmed multiple occurrences of finding vapes and a pack of cigarettes in RI #27's possession. When asked if she also found a lighter at the time she found cigarettes, EI #17 said she did not see one at that time, but had not looked. EI #17 said she thought a lighter was found in RI #27's room at a later time. EI #17 indicated she reported all findings of vapes and cigarettes and turned the items in to the DON or the Administrator and documented them in RI #27's progress notes. When asked if EI #1 and EI #2 gave her further instructions on how to address RI #27's noncompliance each time they were notified, EI #17 said she was told to continue providing education on Signature Healthcare of Whitesburg Gardens being a smoke-free facility, which she was already doing, and to confiscate the vapes and document what had been done. EI #17 also indicated she was instructed to search RI #27's room on only one occasion in December 2022, but was not provided any instructions or training on how to conduct the search. On 02/19/2023 at 1:34 PM, a telephone interview was conducted with EI #31, the CNA that found a vape in RI #27's possession on 12/28/2022. EI #31 said on that day she was walking down the hall and smelled a fruity smell. EI #31 said she walked in RI #27's room and saw RI #27 laying there with eyes closed with a vape on his/her chest. EI #31 said when she touched RI #27, RI #27 immediately opened his/her eyes. EI #31 said she informed RI #27 this was a non-smoking facility and he/she was not supposed to have the vape. EI #31 said she went and informed EI #17 and also notified EI #1 and EI #2. EI #31 said she had personally confiscated three vapes off of RI #27. EI #31 recalled one day when RI #27 was in his/her room vaping and blowing the smoke out of his/her nose and mouth, blowing it everywhere. The surveyor asked EI #31 if she thought RI #27 understood the risk of vaping and smoking in the facility. EI #31 said she thought RI #27 did know the risks, but RI #27 was just going to do what he/she wanted to do. When asked if she had ever been in-serviced on what to do if she saw any vapes, cigarettes or lighters in RI #27's room, EI #31 said staff had been told to take them from RI #27 and turn them in to EI #1 and EI #2. A review of RI #27's Resident Progress Notes revealed the following entries were made by EI #26, an LPN providing care for RI #27 on the 6 PM - 6 AM shift: . 11/24/2022 4:56 (4:56 AM) At approx. (approximately) 0430 (4:30 AM), CNA notified the nurse of a resident having a vape in (his/her) hand holding it, the nurse went to the resident's room and turned on the light and the resident had (his/her) back turned away from the door towards #B bed with a vape in (his/her) hand up to (his/her) face, the nurse asked (him/her) what does (he/she) have in (his/her) hand? and asked for the vape which was warm to touch, nurse once again educated the resident on smoking in the facility and smoking while having a nicotine patch on (him/her) person, resident . just shrugged (his/her) shoulders, nurse notified DON and attempted to notify MD of the above and no answer of the phone will have on coming nurse to notify MD . 01/07/2023 18:34 (6:34 PM) CNA informed this nurse of the resident lying in bed with (his/her) hand on (his/her) chest, holding a va[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

QAPI Program (Tag F0867)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

Based on interviews, review of a policy titled Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program Policy, and review of the facility's 12/23/2022 and 01/25/2023 QUALITY PERFORMANCE/PEER REVIEW F...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews, review of a policy titled Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program Policy, and review of the facility's 12/23/2022 and 01/25/2023 QUALITY PERFORMANCE/PEER REVIEW FACILITY PLAN OF ACTION/CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, the facility's QAPI committee failed to thoroughly implement the 12/23/2021 and 01/25/2023 action plans, which included an action item for laundry staff to monitor residents clothing to evaluate for burn holes, soot, and evidence of smoking. This failure placed all 109 residents residing in the facility at risk for immediate jeopardy, as it was likely to result in serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment or death, due to the ongoing resident safety risk and fire hazard. On 02/24/2023 at 5:05 PM, the facility's Administrator, Employee Identifier (EI) #1 and the [NAME] President (VP) of Clinical Operations, EI #36, were provided a copy of the immediate jeopardy template and notified of the immediate jeopardy findings in the area of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), F867-QAPI/Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA). Findings include: During the survey, document review and interviews with staff revealed Resident Identifier (RI) #27 had multiple documented episodes of non-compliance with the facility's non-smoking policy, including vaping and smoking in his/her room and hiding vaping and smoking materials from facility staff. This noncompliance was documented to have occurred from 11/15/2022 through 02/13/2023, despite repeated education to RI #27 on the facility's non-smoking policy. Cross reference F656 and F689. The facility policy titled Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program Policy, reviewed and revised 10/19/2022, documented: PURPOSE STATEMENT: To provide a process that will enhance the care and experience for all residents . POLICY STATEMENT: It is the intent of the facility to conduct an on-going Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement (QAPI) program designed to systematically monitor, evaluate and improve the quality and appropriateness of resident care. QAPI supports the overall goals of the facility and examines both outcomes and processes relevant to these outcomes with the objective of improving the organization's overall performance with addressing care and management systems. DEFINITIONS . Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) is the coordinated application of two mutually reinforcing aspects of a quality management system: Quality Assurance (QA) and Performance Improvement (PI). QAPI takes a systematic, interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and date-driven approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality in nursing homes while involving residents and families in practical and creative problem solving. Quality Assurance (QA) is the specification of standards for quality of service and outcomes, and systems throughout the organization for assuring that care is maintained at acceptable levels in relation to those standards. QA is ongoing, both anticipatory and retrospective in its efforts to identify how the organization is performing, including where and why facility performance is at risk or has failed to meet standards. Performance Improvements (PI) (also called Quality Improvement- QI) is the continuous study and improvement of processes with the intent to improve services or outcomes and prevent or decrease the likelihood of problems by identifying areas of opportunity and testing new approaches to fix underlying causes of persistent/systematic problems or barriers to improvement . GUIDELINES . 6. The facility will identify areas for QAPI monitoring and tools/resources to be utilized. These monitoring activities should focus on those processes that significantly affect resident outcomes. 7. Completion of additional audits and assessments will be determined by concerns identified through the QAPI committee. 12. Based on audit findings, plans will be developed, and tasks assigned to appropriate Stakeholders to include required completion dates. The facility's 12/23/2022, QUALITY PERFORMANCE/PEER REVIEW FACILITY PLAN OF ACTION/CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, documented: PROBLEM AREA IDENTIFIED: Problem/Opportunity: Resident not compliant with No Smoking policy . 4-Step Action Plan: . 2. Measures put in place and systemic changes you will make to ensure the deficient practice does not reoccur: .Laundry to monitor residents clothing to evaluate for burn holes, soot, evidence of smoking . There was no DATE COMPLETED listed on this action plan. The facility's 01/25/2023, QUALITY PERFORMANCE/PEER REVIEW FACILITY PLAN OF ACTION/CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, documented: PROBLEM AREA IDENTIFIED: Problem/Opportunity: Resident not compliant with No Smoking policy . 4-Step Action Plan: . 2. Measures put in place and systemic changes you will make to ensure the deficient practice does not reoccur: .Laundry to monitor residents clothing to evaluate for burn holes, soot, evidence of smoking . There was still no DATE COMPLETED listed on this action plan. An interview was conducted with EI #32, Laundry Attendant, on 02/21/2023 at 4:55 PM. EI #32 stated she had not been told anything about observing RI #27's clothing when they come to the laundry. An interview was conducted with EI # 33, Laundry Aide, on 02/22/2023 at 9:51 AM. EI #33 stated she was not informed to observe RI #27's clothes for burn holes and soot until the day before, 02/21/2023. An interview was conducted with EI #34, Laundry Aide, on 02/22/2023 at 10:42 AM. EI #34 stated she was not told anything about monitoring RI #27's clothes. An interview was conducted with EI #21, Laundry Supervisor, on 02/22/2023 at 12:28 PM. When asked what she was told regarding RI #27's clothing, EI #21 stated she was instructed to check for holes and burn marks for all residents, not just RI #27. EI #21 said the Administrator, EI #1, and EI #2, Director of Nursing (DON), told her to do this during a safety meeting, she believed was about a month prior. EI #21 also stated she was told to instruct her workers to make sure they check for holes in clothes. When asked to provide the documentation of where she informed or educated her staff on the need to do this, EI #21 provided documentation of education dated the day prior, 02/21/2023. An interview was conducted with EI #1, the Administrator, on 02/16/2023 at 11:39 AM. EI #1 stated QAPI first discussed RI #27's noncompliance with the facility's non-smoking policy during the 12/23/2022 QAPI meeting. She stated the team discussed interventions they were working on to try to get RI #27 to comply with the policy and they were trying to identify the source of RI #27's vaping and smoking materials. EI #1 said QAPI next discussed RI #27 during the 01/25/2023 QAPI meeting. A follow-up interview was conducted with EI #1 on 02/17/2022 at 1:39 PM. During the interview, EI #1 acknowledged the QAPI committee failed to identify RI #27 did not have a care plan addressing the continued noncompliance with the facility's non-smoking policy. Another interview was conducted with EI #1 on 02/23/2023 at 4:31 PM. EI #1 stated EI #21, the Laundry Supervisor, was responsible for informing her laundry staff they were to look for burn holes, soot and evidence of smoking. When asked when laundry staff had been informed, EI #1 said she did not recall EI #21 saying staff had been inserviced, but she was of the impression EI #21 had told them. When asked why laundry staff were reporting they had not been told, EI #1 said she did not know. EI #1 said EI #21 should have educated her staff after the 12/23/2023 QAPI meeting. EI #1 indicated inservice records related to monitoring RI #27's clothing for burn holes, soot and evidence of smoking would be evidence staff were informed. When asked the importance of monitoring clothing for burn holes, soot or evidence of smoking, EI #1 said it would help determine if the resident had been smoking in his/her room and could indicate a risk of causing harm. EI #1 stated she was the one responsible for ensuring the facility's QAPI action plan was fully implemented, and indicated they should have gone through each item on the action plan to ensure everything was being done. This deficiency was cited as a result of complaint/report numbers AL00043096 and AL00043372. ***************************************************** The facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan on 02/26/2023 for F867 that outlined the following: 1. Four laundry staff were educated by the HCSG housekeeping supervisor on 02/23/2023 to look for burn holes, soot, and evidence of smoking. The HCSG Housekeeping/Laundry District Manager re-educated six laundry staff and the HCSG housekeeping supervisor on 02/25/2023 to look for burn holes, soot, and evidence of smoking. The HCSG Housekeeping/Laundry District Manager educated the HCSG Housekeeping supervisor on her responsibilities for training laundry staff and monitoring residents' clothing for damage and other reasons such as cigarette burns. This was completed on 02/25/2023. 2. All residents have the potential to be affected. The QAPI committee meet on 02/22/2023 to assess and revise action plans to promote resident safety due to RI #27's noncompliance with the facility's nonsmoking policy. 3. The [NAME] President of Clinical Operations (VPCO) educated members of the QAPI Committee (Administrator, Medical Director, DON, MDS coordinator, Maintenance Director, Registered Dietician, Business Office Manager (BOM), Admissions Coordinator, HCSG Housekeeping and Laundry Supervisor, SDC, Life Enrichment Director, and Assistant Business Office manager) on 02/24/2023 and 02/25/2023, regarding the QAPI process. - The education was to ensure the facility's QAPI committee understands the importance of developing and implementing effective plans to ensure problems are corrected, reducing residents' risk for safety and hazards. This was completed on 02/24/203 and 02/25/2023. The QAPI team analyzed data from the citations, audits, and interviews to ensure effective plans and interventions are in place. - The Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee (QAPI) meeting was held on 02/24/2023 and 02/25/2023, to complete a systematic, interdisciplinary, comprehensive, root cause analysis of the performance improvement action plans related to the Non-Smoking policy, Care Planning behaviors, Behavior Health policy, Accidents, and Supervision, Contraband Policy, QAPI, and non-compliant smokers process to reduce the risk of a hazard related to a fire. This included education provided by the VPCO. - On 02/24/2023 and 02/25/2023 the QAPI committee consisting of the Administrator, Medical Director, DON, MDS coordinator, Maintenance Director, Registered Dietician, Business Office Manager (BOM), Admissions Coordinator, HCSG Housekeeping and Laundry Supervisor, SDC, Life Enrichment Director, and Assistant Business Office manager led by the VPCO evaluated the effectiveness of the action plans for non-compliant smokers and developed a plan of correction addressing if necessary additional education and additional audits required. - The Plan of correction for QAPI (F867) is to review all action plans related to F656, F689, F740, F835, F837, and F867 and use root cause analysis to determine the effectiveness of the action plans and revise the plans with different interventions and approaches when compliance is not achieved for the established thresholds. Based on audit findings, plans will be developed, and tasks assigned to appropriate Stakeholders to include required completion dates. The Administrator provides oversight to the QAPI committee and program. The Administrator was trained on 02/24/2023 by the VPCO on the QAPI Program Policy. ********************** On 02/26/2023 at 11:15 PM, after review of the information provided in the facility's Removal Plan, in-service/education records, as well as staff interviews, and observations, the survey team determined the facility implemented the immediate corrective actions as of 2/26/2023 and the scope and severity was lowered to an F level, to allow the facility time to further address and monitor the deficient practice in order to achieve compliance.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record reviews and review of a facility policy titled, Contraband Discovery Policy, the facility failed to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record reviews and review of a facility policy titled, Contraband Discovery Policy, the facility failed to ensure staff did not search Resident Identifier (RI) #27's room on 12/07/2022 without first obtaining RI #27's consent. This deficient practice affected RI #27, one of one sampled resident reviewed for for improper room searches. Findings include: A facility policy titled Contraband Discovery Policy, revised 10/18/2022, documented: .Use for conducting inspections and searches, with consent, of current residents and residents' rooms under circumstances where there is reasonable suspicion that the resident may be concealing contraband. For purposes of this policy . non-compliant use of tobacco products as per the facility smoking policy is considered contraband. GUIDELINES: 1. If facility staff identify items or substances that pose risks to residents' health and safety and are in plain view, they may confiscate them. 2. Facility staff should not conduct searches of a resident or their personal belongings, unless the resident, or their representatives agrees to a voluntary search and understands the reason for the search. 3. Obtain consent from resident and/or resident representative to search resident's body or personal possessions. 6. Inform the resident and/or resident representative that he/she and or his/her room will be searched and the reason for the search. Give the resident the opportunity to surrender the suspected contraband and to the extent possible, give the resident the opportunity to be present during the search. RI #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of RI #27's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date of 12/22/2022, indicated RI #27 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated RI #27 was cognitively intact. RI #27's Resident Progress Notes, documented: .12/07/2022 13:50 (1:50 PM) . staff found a vape in (RI #27's) top bedside drawer tucked inside a sock. vape was handed to the administrator who informed staff to take another peek while (he/she's) not in (his/her) room to see if (he/she) had any other vaping devices. After inspecting resident's room further staff found a brown paper bag containing four more vaping devices. The brown bag was turned into DON before resident returned to (his/her) room . This note was made by Employee Identifier (EI) # 17, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). RI #27 was interviewed on 02/21/2023 at 5:18 PM. RI #27 stated he/she never gave staff permission to search his/her room. EI #17 was interviewed on 02/19/2023 at 9:05 AM. EI #17 stated in December she was told to search RI #27's room. She stated RI #27 was at therapy, and she saw something in his/her open drawer. She stated it was a sock with something sticking out of it. EI #17 stated she walked over and looked at the sock and tried to close the drawer. EI #17 said when she did this, she felt the shape of a vape inside the sock, so she removed it and took it to EI #1, the Administrator. According to EI #17, EI #1 instructed her to go ahead and search RI #27's room. EI #17 indicated EI #18, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was also present at the time the search was conducted. A follow-up telephone interview was conducted with EI #17 on 02/22/2023 at 12:29 PM. EI #17 stated she did not obtain consent from RI #27 prior to searching the room. She stated EI #1 never told her she needed to. EI #18, CNA, was interviewed on 02/20/2023 at 5:39 PM. She stated she did witness EI #17 search RI #27's room in early December 2022. EI #18 stated RI #27 was in therapy at the time of the search. She stated EI #17 went in RI #27's room and searched a purple backpack, while she stood outside the the room to keep watch. During an interview with EI #1, Administrator, on 02/23/2023 at 4:31 PM, EI #1 acknowledged searching RI #27's room without his/her consent would be a violation of resident rights. This deficiency was cited as a result of complaint/report numbers AL00043096 and AL00043372.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0645 (Tag F0645)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review and review of a facility policy Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), the facil...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review and review of a facility policy Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), the facility failed to ensure a Level II PASRR evaluation for Resident Identifier (RI) #37 was completed as indicated when the Level I PASRR screening determined a Level II PASRR was necessary. This affected RI #37, one of one resident sampled for PASRR requirements. Findings include: A facility policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) with a review date of 08/01/2018, documented, . PASRR requires that 1) all applicants to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility be evaluated for serious mental illness (SMI) and/or intellectual disability; 2) be offered the most appropriate setting for their needs (in the community, a nursing facility, or acute care setting); and 3) receive the services they need in those settings. GUIDELINE: .2. Those individuals who test positive at Level 1 are then evaluated in depth, called Level II PASRR. The results of this evaluation result in determination of need, determination of appropriate setting, and a set of recommendations for services to inform the individual's plan of care. RI #37 was admitted to the facility 12/28/2020 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include Bipolar Disorder. RI #37's OBRA PASRR LEVEL I CATEGORICAL DETERMINATION FOR NF (Nursing Facility) CONVALESCENT CARE admission on LY dated 10/03/2022, documented, After a Quality Assurance Review, this NF applicant requires a Level II Evaluation due to the documented serious mental health diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder but meets the terms of a Categorical Determination for Convalescent Care and may be admitted to a NF to complete the Level II Evaluation . Employee Identifier (EI) #20, Business Office, was interviewed on 02/22/2023 at 11:52 AM. EI #20 stated RI #37 has a diagnosis of Bipolar. When asked who was responsible for making the referrals to the appropriate designated authority when a Level II PASRR is needed, EI #20 stated it was usually the Social Worker's job, but she was not trained yet, so it would be up to the Administrator who she assigned to that task. EI #20 stated they were reviewing that chart and noted RI #37's Level II PASRR was not in there. EI #20 stated once RI #37 was admitted to the facility, the OBRA office should have been notified that a Level II was needed. EI #20 stated the concern for RI #37 not having a completed Level II PASRR was that it was needed to make sure the facility was appropriate, and that this was the right setting for the resident.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, record review and review of a facility policy titled, Departmental (Respiratory Therapy)-Prev...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, record review and review of a facility policy titled, Departmental (Respiratory Therapy)-Prevention of Infection, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #30 had orders for oxygen and his/her oxygen tubing/humidifier bottle was labeled/dated. This deficient practice affected RI #30, one of five sampled residents receiving respiratory services. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Departmental (Respiratory Therapy)-Prevention of Infection, revised 11/2011, revealed the following: Purpose The purpose of this procedure is to guide prevention of infection associated with respiratory therapy task and equipment . Steps in the Procedure Infection Control Considerations Related to Oxygen Administration . 3. [NAME] bottle with date and initials upon opening and discard after twenty-four (24) hours . 7. Change the oxygen cannulae and tubing every seven (7) days, or as needed . RI #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Shortness of Breath and Wheezing. A review of RI #30's Physician Order Report dated 01/16/2023 - 02/16/2023, revealed RI #30 did not have an order for oxygen. On 02/14/2023 at 5:36 PM, the surveyor observed RI #30's oxygen infusing via nasal cannula at 2 liters. The oxygen tubing was connected to a humidifier bottle and there was no date on the oxygen tubing or humidifier bottle. On 02/15/2023 at 8:36 AM, RI #30's oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle remained undated. On 02/16/2023 at 10:43 AM, RI #30 was observed in a wheelchair being taken to therapy. There was a portable oxygen tank in use at this time and the oxygen tubing remained undated. On 02/17/2023 at 11:17 AM, RI #30 was observed sitting on the side of the bed. The oxygen infusing. The oxygen tubing remained undated. On 02/17/2023 at 11:50 AM, Employee Identifier (EI) #29, a Registered Nurse escorted the surveyor to RI #30's room. The surveyor asked EI #29 did he see a date on RI #30's oxygen tubing/humidifier water bottle. EI #29 said no. EI #29 said there should be a date on the tubing/bottle. When asked the rational for labeling the tubing/humidifier, EI #29 said so the nurses would know when to change it again. On 02/21/2023 at 5:37 PM, the surveyor conducted an interview with EI #2, the Director of Nursing (DON). When asked if RI #30 had a physician's order for the oxygen, EI #2 looked a RI #30's Physician Orders and said she did not see one. EI #2 said a resident using oxygen should have an order for the oxygen. The surveyor asked EI #2 why would it be important for a resident to have a physicians order for the use of oxygen. EI #2 said to ensure the resident was getting the right amount of oxygen.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, record review and review of a facility policy titled, Medication Ordering and Receiving From ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, record review and review of a facility policy titled, Medication Ordering and Receiving From Pharmacy Provider, the facility failed to ensure medications were available at scheduled medication times for Resident Identifier (RI) #30. This deficient practice affected RI #30, one of four residents reviewed for medication availability. Finding include: 1) Review of a facility policy titled, Medication Ordering and Receiving From Pharmacy Provider, dated 01/2022, revealed the following: . POLICY Medications and related products are received from the provider pharmacy on a timely basis. The nursing center maintains accurate records of medication order and receipt. PROCEDURES . a. All new medication orders are transmitted to the pharmacy. e. New medications . If the first dose of medication is scheduled to be given before the next regularly scheduled pharmacy delivery, please telephone or transmit the medication orders to the pharmacy immediately upon receipt. Timely delivery of new orders is required so that medication administration is not delayed. g. New admission orders: When transmitting medication orders for a newly admitted resident, the pharmacy should be given date of birth , social security number, attending physician . RI #30 was admitted to the facility 01/24/2923. On 01/25/2023 at 8:45, the AM medication pass for RI #30 was observed. EI #9, Registered Nurse prepared Eliquis, Norvasc, Atorvastin, Vitamin D 400 Units, Magnesium Oxide, Multivitamin, and Potassium. She indicated to the surveyor RI #30's Lasix, Metoprolol, Protonix and Doxycycline were not in the cart. A review of admission orders received to the facility on 1/24/23 at 11:09 AM indicated the Metoprolol, Protonix, Doxycline and Lasix were on the on the admission/discharge orders. A review of the Pharmacy sheet indicated the orders received to the Pharmacy 1/24/23 at 1:56 PM. On 1/25/23 at 10:45 AM an interview with EI #12, the admitting nurse revealed she got the orders before the resident arrived she entered the information in the system then called to ensure the pharmacy received them. EI #12 was asked what medication were ordered; she said all the ones on the discharge from hospital list. EI #12 was asked why was the Lasix, Protonix, Metoprolol and Doxycycline not delivered; she said she did not know, it was ordered. EI #12 was asked what should be done if medication not available; she said notify the Pharmacy and the Doctor. EI #12 was asked what was being done to ensure medications were available. She was asked what time did she send it to the Pharmacy; she said before 3:00 PM. EI #12 was asked when should resident medications not be available. EI #12 said they should always be available. EI #12 was asked how often were new resident medications not available. She said a few times. On 1/25/23 at 12:05 PM an interview was conducted with EI #9. EI #9 was asked what medications that were due on the morning pass were not available; she said the Lasix, Protonix, Metoprolol and Doxycycline. EI #9 was asked how often new resident medications were not available; she said she had only worked there about a week and it had occurred a few times. EI #9 was asked what did she do when medications were not available; she said call pharmacy, and if needed call the doctor, and she told the unit manager. EI #9 was asked what was the harm in resident medications not available. EI #9 said doctors orders were not followed if medications were not given due to being unavailable. On 01/26/2023 at 5:00 PM, an interview was conducted with EI #2, the Director of Nursing (DON). EI #2 was asked what was the policy for medications to be available. EI #2 said it should be available for the medication pass. EI #2 was asked if RI #30 was admitted on [DATE] before 3:00 PM when should medications have been available. EI #2 said that night around 8:00 PM. She was asked to read off the medications ordered and then asked if the Lasix, Protonix, Metoprolol and Doxycline were on the list; she said yes. EI #2 was asked why those medications were not available for the morning medication pass; she said she was not sure. EI #2 was asked how often medications were not available for new residents. She said they have had the problem for several weeks and they were working on it. EI #2 was asked if they were working on it and medications were still not available was there still a problem; she said yes. 02/20/2023 at 6:42 PM, a follow-up interview was conducted with EI #2. EI #2 said the problem with medications not being available were the medications upon admission. EI #2 said when residents were admitted in the evening, the next morning they would not have all their medications for the medication pass. When asked why this was, EI #2 said the way their system was set up, if residents are not in the building by 5 PM so that the orders can be activated, the order is not transmitted to the pharmacy in time for the night time delivery. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00043096.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 1) Review of a facility policy titled, Expired Medications, with a reviewed date of 10/01/2018, revealed the following: . PROCE...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 1) Review of a facility policy titled, Expired Medications, with a reviewed date of 10/01/2018, revealed the following: . PROCEDURE: . 2. Nursing inspects containers regularly for expiration dates. Nursing also does frequent inspections of Medication carts for expired drugs . On 02/16/2023 at 9:52 AM, the surveyor observed Employee Identifier (EI) #16, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Unit Manager, prepare medications. EI #16 searched the medication cart drawer and removed a container of Multivitamin (MVI), a stock medication. The container of MVI was dated with an open date of 08/20/2022, and the expiration date on the container was 01/2023. The surveyor asked EI #16 should the container of MVI be on the medication cart. EI #16 said no. When asked what could potentially occur when an expired medication is administered, EI #16 said there was a potential for the medication to lose its strength. The surveyor asked EI #16 what should happen when a medication/vitamin expires. EI #16 said it should be taken off the medication cart and discarded. On 02/21/2023 at 5:15 PM, the surveyor conducted an interview with EI #2, the Director of Nursing (DON). When asked where expired stock medications should be stored, EI #2 said there were bags and boxes in the medication room to put expired medications in. EI #2 said expired medications should be pulled out and never left in the medication drawer on the medication cart. The surveyor asked EI #2 when expired medications should be pulled off the medication cart. EI #2 said as soon as they have been identified as being expired. When asked who would be responsible for ensuring expired medications are not left on the medication cart, EI #2 said the nurse who is preparing to give the OTC (Over The Counter), the nurse management does random cart checks, and the pharmacy consultant does monthly checks as well. The surveyor asked EI #2, with those three processes in place, should there ever be an expired OTC medication on the cart. EI #2 said no. 2) Review of a facility policy titled, Medication Storage Controlled Medication Storage, dated 11/2017, revealed the following: . POLICY Medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classification as controlled substances are subject to special handling, storage, disposal and record keeping in the nursing center in accordance with federal, state and other applicable laws and regulations. PROCEDURES . 4. Controlled medications requiring refrigeration are stored within a locked, permanently affixed box within the refrigerator . Resident Identifier (RI) #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #70's Physician Order Report dated 01/23/2023 - 02/23/2023, revealed RI #70 had an order for Lorazepam (Ativan) - Schedule IV concentrate 2 mg/ml give 0.25 ml by mouth every 2 hours as needed for anxiety/behaviors. RI #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #85's Physician Order Report dated 01/23/2023 - 02/23/2023, revealed RI #85 had an order for Lorazepam - Schedule IV concentrate 2 mg/ml administer 0.25 ml as needed for anxiety/restlessness. RI #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #56's Physician Order Report dated 01/23/2023 - 02/23/2023, revealed RI #56 had an order for Lorazepam - Schedule IV concentrate 2 mg/ml give 0.5 ml by mouth sublingual every 2 hours as needed for agitation. RI #217 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #217's Physician Order Report dated 01/25/2023 - 02/25/2023, revealed RI #217 had an order for Lorazepam - Schedule IV concentrate 2 mg/ml give 1 ml oral as needed for agitation. RI #110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #110 had expired and was not in the facility. RI #110's Physician Order Report dated 01/25/2023 - 02/25/2023, revealed RI #110 had an order for Lorazepam - Schedule IV concentrate 2 mg/ml give 0.25 ml sublingual every 4 hours as needed for anxiety. RI #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #48 had expired and was no longer in the facility. RI #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 02/23/2023 at 10:36 AM, the surveyor observed the medication room on the 3rd station with Employee Identifier (EI) #13. EI #13 unlocked the refrigerator and the surveyor observed boxes of Lorazepam 2 mg (milligrams)/ml (milliliters) belonging to RI #s 70, 85, 56, 217, 110, 48 and 72. The surveyor asked EI #13 should the boxes of Lorazepam be in a locked compartment affixed to the shelf in the refrigerator. EI #13 said she had seen it that way in several places she had worked, but she was not sure how it should be stored at this facility. On 02/23/2023 at 11:39 AM, the surveyor showed the Unit Manager, EI #16, the boxes of Lorazepam in the medication refrigerator. The surveyor asked EI #16 where the Lorazepam should be stored. EI #16 said in a locked box in the refrigerator. When asked why it should be stored in a locked box, EI #16 said for safety. On 02/23/2023 at 11:53 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with EI #2, the Director of Nursing. When asked how the liquid Lorazepam in the refrigerator should be stored, EI #2 said in a locked refrigerator. The surveyor asked EI #2 if the Lorazepam should be stored in a permanently affixed compartment. EI #2 said not as long as it was behind two locks. On 02/24/23 at 10:13 AM, the surveyor conducted a telephone interview with EI #11, the pharmacist. When asked what Schedule of drug was Lorazepam, EI #11 said it was a Schedule IV. The surveyor asked how the liquid Lorazepam should be stored in the refrigerator. EI #11 said it should be in a separate, locked container in the refrigerator. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00043096. Based on observations, interviews, medical record review, and review of facility policies titled, Expired Medications and Medication Storage Controlled Medication Storage, the facility failed to ensure: 1) a stock bottle of expired Multivitamin was not left on a medication cart; and 2) liquid Lorazepam 2 mg (milligram)/ml (milliliter), belonging to Resident Identifier (RI) #s 70, 85, 56, 217, 110, 48 and 72 were stored in a permanently affixed compartment in the refrigerator. These deficient practices affected one of four medication carts observed, and six residents with their liquid Lorazepam stored in the refrigerator. Findings include:
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0806 (Tag F0806)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, medical record review, the 01/13/2023 diet order for Resident Identifier (RI) #50, the 01/24/2023 breakfast ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, medical record review, the 01/13/2023 diet order for Resident Identifier (RI) #50, the 01/24/2023 breakfast tray ticket for RI #50, and the facility's policy for Dining and Food Preferences, the facility failed to ensure RI #50 received large portions for breakfast on 01/24/2023. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the facility's kitchen. Findings Include: The facility's policy for Dining and Food Preferences, revised 9/2017, included the following: Policy Statement Individual dining, food, and beverage preferences are identified for all residents/patients. Procedures . 7. The individual tray assembly ticket will identify all food items appropriate for the resident/patient based on diet order, . and preferences. RI #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include End Stage Renal Disease, Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease, Non-pressure Ulcer of Buttock Limited to Breakdown of Skin, Dementia, Anemia, Nausea with vomiting, and Vitamin Deficiency. RI #50's diet order, dated 01/13/2023, was for a Regular Diet with Special Instructions: Renal, 1500 ml (milliliters) per day fluid restriction, and large portions at breakfast. RI #50's Breakfast tray ticket for Tuesday, Menu Week 4, Day 24 on 01/24/2023 was reviewed and no instructions for large portions were found on the ticket. During an interview with Employee Identifier (EI) #4, the Registered Dietitian, on 01/24/2023 at 4:07 PM, it was confirmed that the Large Portions for Breakfast instruction was not printed on the breakfast tray ticket for RI #50. EI #4 said she did not understand why the ticket was not correct. EI #4 further said breakfast was important for RI #50 because it is the only meal that the resident really eats.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0808 (Tag F0808)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, medical record review, the diet orders for Resident Identifier (RI) #60, RI #39, and RI #50, the tray ticket...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, medical record review, the diet orders for Resident Identifier (RI) #60, RI #39, and RI #50, the tray tickets for breakfast, lunch, and dinner on 1/24/2023, and the facility's policies for Therapeutic Diets, Fluid Restriction, and Dining and Food Preferences; the facility failed to ensure RI #60, RI #39, and RI #50 received meals according to their therapeutic diet orders. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the facility's kitchen. Findings Include: The facility's policy for Therapeutic Diets, revised 9/2017, included the following: Policy Statement All residents have a diet order, including regular, therapeutic, and texture modification, that is prescribed by the attending physician . Definitions 'Therapeutic diet' is defined as a diet ordered by a physician . as part of the treatment for a disease or clinical condition. The facility's policy for Fluid Restriction, revised 9/2017, included the following: Policy Statement A fluid restriction will be implemented only as part of a therapeutic diet prescription. The facility's policy for Dining and Food Preferences, revised 9/2017, included the following: Policy Statement Individual dining, food, and beverage preferences are identified for all residents/patients. Procedures . 7. The individual tray assembly ticket will identify all food items appropriate for the resident/patient based on diet order . 1.) RI #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include End Stage Renal Disease, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Polyneuropathy, and Cognitive Communication Deficit. RI #60's diet order, dated 09/20/2022, was for a CCD (Consistent Carbohydrate Diet) Renal with Special Instructions: fluid restriction 1200 for Dietary 1 glass per tray 480 ml (milliliters) from Nursing NAS (No Added Salt). RI #60's breakfast, lunch, and dinner tray tickets for Tuesday, Menu Week 4, Day 24 on 01/24/2023 were reviewed. The tray tickets indicated RI #60 was to receive a CCD Renal diet with NAS and a 1000 ml fluid restriction. The breakfast tray ticket included 8 ounces (240 ml) 2 % (percent) Milk and 4 ounces (120 ml) Cranberry Juice as fluid. The lunch tray ticket included two 8-ounce glasses of water for 16 ounces (480 ml) and 6 ounces (177 ml) Decaffeinated Coffee or Tea as fluid. The dinner tray ticket included two 8-ounce glasses of water for 16 ounces (480 ml) and 6 ounces (177 ml) Decaffeinated Tea as fluid. Employee Identifier (EI) #4, the Registered Dietitian, was interviewed on 01/24/2023 at 4:07 PM. EI #4 said the tray tickets for RI #60 were wrong. EI #4 said the tray tickets should indicate a 1200 ml fluid restriction and one 8-ounce glass (240 ml) of fluid per tray. EI #4 said an additional 4 ounces (120 ml) of Cranberry Juice was later approved for breakfast, but the remaining liquid was to be used for snacks and medication pass. EI #6, the Medical Director, was interviewed on 01/25/2023 at 12:20 PM. EI #6 said the diet order instructions were not being followed for RI #60. 2.) RI #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include End Stage Renal Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease. RI #39's diet order, dated 01/13/2023, was for a CCD with Special Instructions: Renal diet. RI #39's breakfast, lunch, and dinner tray tickets for Tuesday, Menu Week 4, Day 24 on 01/24/2023 were reviewed. The tray tickets indicated RI #39 was to receive a CCD diet. EI #4, the Registered Dietitian, was interviewed on 01/24/2023 at 4:07 PM. EI #4 said the tray tickets for RI #39 were wrong because Renal was not included. EI #6, the Medical Director, was interviewed on 01/25/2023 at 12:20 PM. EI #6 said, if the Renal diet was not included, RI #39 could get too much protein and sodium, which could cause further deterioration of the patient's kidney function. 3.) RI #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include End Stage Renal Disease, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Dementia, and Other Disorders of Electrolyte and Fluid Balance. RI #50's diet order, dated 01/13/2023, was for a Regular Diet with Special Instructions: Renal, 1500 ml per day fluid restriction, and large portions at breakfast. RI #50's breakfast, lunch, and dinner tray tickets for Tuesday, Menu Week 4, Day 24 on 01/24/2023 were reviewed. The tray tickets indicated RI #50 was to receive a Regular diet. RI #50's tray tickets also included Needs High Potassium foods. EI #4, the Registered Dietitian, was interviewed on 01/24/2023 at 4:07 PM. EI #4 said the tray tickets for RI #50 were wrong because the resident was supposed to be on a Regular Renal diet with a 1500 ml fluid restriction. EI #4 said she did not know why the tray tickets indicated Needs High Potassium foods and further said that was concerning. EI #6, the Medical Director, was interviewed on 01/25/2023 at 12:20 PM. EI #6 said it is usually not the case for high potassium foods to be used in kidney disease. EI #6 further said we are trying to prevent excessive electrolytes and protein in the individual's system via the Renal diet and Dialysis.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and review of FUNDAMENTALS OF NURSING [NAME], the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and review of FUNDAMENTALS OF NURSING [NAME], the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene before applying a clean brief during incontinent care for Resident Identifier (RI) #110. This affected RI #110, one of one resident observed for incontinent care. Findings include: A review of Fundamentals of Nursing [NAME] 10th Edition Chapter 40 Pages 892 - 899 revealed . Bathing and Perineal Care . Equipment . Clean gloves, . (4) Remove soiled gloves and discard in trash a. wash back (1) Perform hand hygiene and apply clean pair of gloves . (5) . Clean, rinse and dry area thoroughly . Remove contaminated gloves . perform hand hygiene. RI #110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 01/25/2023 at 3:15 PM, Employee Identifier (EI) #10, a CNA was observed performing pericare for RI #110. EI #10 gathered her supplies, washed her hands and put on gloves. EI #10 cleaned RI #110's front and back, then with the same contaminated gloves, placed and secured a clean brief on RI #110. On 01/25/2023 at 3:25 PM, an interview was conducted with EI #10. EI #10 was asked when should she change her gloves during pericare. EI #10 said she should change between the dirty and clean task. EI #10 was asked what should she have done after she cleaned the back side of RI #110, and before placing the clean brief on RI #110. EI #10 said she should have removed the gloves, washed her hands, and put on a clear pair of gloves. EI #10 was asked if she changed her gloves, washed her hands after cleaning RI #110, before she placed the clean brief on RI #110. EI #10 said no. EI #10 was asked what would the harm be in using the same gloves to clean the peri area then place a clean brief on RI #110. EI #10 said cross contamination. On 1/26/2023 at 3:30 PM an interview was conducted with EI #3, Registered Nurse/Infection Preventionist. She was asked what was the policy for glove changes during pericare. EI #3 said they were to change after providing the pericare, they should wash their hands and put on new gloves, then place the clean brief. EI #3 was asked when should the CNA clean a resident, then with the same gloves, place the clean brief. EI #3 said they should not. EI #3 was asked when should the CNA wash their hands. EI #3 said before starting, between glove changes; she should have cleaned the resident, removed her gloves and washed her hands. EI #3 said the CNA should have put on new gloves then placed the clean brief. EI #3 was asked what was the harm in the CNA using the same gloves to clean a resident then placing a clean brief. EI #3 said it could contaminate the clean brief, it would be cross contamination.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, the facility's policies for Staff Attire, Food Preparation, and Food Storage: Cold Foods, and the 2017 Food Code of the United States (U.S.) Public Health Service and ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, the facility's policies for Staff Attire, Food Preparation, and Food Storage: Cold Foods, and the 2017 Food Code of the United States (U.S.) Public Health Service and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA); the facility failed to ensure food safety by: 1.) Employee Identifier (EI) #7 not wearing a beard covering over his mustache while serving the breakfast meal on 1/24/2023, 2.) keeping boiled eggs with a use by date of 1/11/2023 in the Walk-in Cooler on 1/24/2023, 3.) keeping Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) food in the Station #2 resident refrigerator at 53º (degrees) Fahrenheit (F) and the freezer at 15º F on 1/24/2023, and 4.) the Station #1 resident refrigerator having no thermometer for staff to monitor the temperature on 1/24/2023 and 1/25/2023. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the facility's kitchen. Findings Include: 1.) The 2017 Food Code of the U.S. Public Health Service and the FDA included the following: . Hair Restraints 2-402.11 Effectiveness. (A) . FOOD EMPLOYEES shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that covers body hair, that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed FOOD; clean EQUIPMENT, UTENSILS, and LINENS; and unwrapped SINGLESERVICE and SINGLE-USE ARTICLES. The facility's policy for Staff Attire revised 9/2017, included the following: Policy Statement All employees wear approved attire for the performance of their duties. Procedures 1. All staff members will have their . facial hair properly restrained. The facility's policy for Food Preparation revised 9/2017, included the following: Policy Statement All foods are prepared in accordance with the FDA Food Code. Procedures . 2. Dining Services staff will be responsible for food preparation procedures that avoid contamination by potentially harmful physical, biological, and chemical contamination. During a kitchen observation on 01/24/2023, the assembly of breakfast trays for residents was observed from the first tray assembled at 7:00 AM to the last cart of trays leaving the kitchen at 8:35 AM. EI #7, the Assistant Dietary Manager, served food from the steamtable onto plates and bowls for the residents and performed additional food related tasks during this time. During the entire resident breakfast tray assembly process, EI #7 wore his beard cover pulled down below his mouth so that his moustache was exposed. EI #7 was interviewed on 1/24/2023 at 9:17 AM. When asked why a beard cover should be worn during food production and service, EI #7 said to prevent hair from falling into the food. EI #5, the Dietary Manager, was interviewed on 1/24/2023 at 5:22 PM. EI #5 said, when foodservice staff did not cover facial hair during food preparation and service, cross-contamination would be a problem if hair fell into the food and contaminated it. EI #4, the Registered Dietitian, was interviewed on 1/24/2023 at 5:25 PM. EI #4 said hair in one's food was unsightly and unprofessional. EI #4 further said it could cause a gag reflex or appetite loss. 2.) The 2017 Food Code of the U.S. Public Health Service and the FDA included the following: . 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking. (A) . refrigerated, READY-TO-EAT, TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD prepared and held in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the FOOD shall be consumed on the PREMISES, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 5ºC (41ºF) or less for a maximum of 7 days. The day of preparation shall be counted as Day 1. (B) . refrigerated, READY-TO-EAT TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD prepared and PACKAGED by a FOOD PROCESSING PLANT shall be clearly marked, at the time the original container is opened in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT and if the FOOD is held for more than 24 hours, to indicate the date or day by which the FOOD shall be consumed on the PREMISES, sold, or discarded, based on the temperature and time combinations specified in ¶ (A) of this section and: . (1) The day the original container is opened in the FOOD ESTABLISHMENT shall be counted as Day 1 . 3-501.18 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Disposition. (A) A FOOD specified in ¶ 3-501.17(A) or (B) shall be discarded if it: (1) Exceeds the temperature and time combination specified in ¶ 3-501.17 (A) . The facility's policy for Food Preparation, revised 9/2017, included: Policy Statement All foods are prepared in accordance with the FDA Food Code. Procedures . 17. all TCS foods that are to be held for more than 24 hours at a temperature of 41º F or less, will be labeled and dated with a 'prepared date' (Day 1) and a 'use by' date (Day 7). On 1/24/2023 at 9:15 AM, an observation of the Walk-in Cooler in the kitchen was made with EI #5, the Dietary Manager. Inside a box of commercially prepared, peeled, boiled eggs was an opened package containing six eggs. The package of boiled eggs was labeled as being opened on 1/4 (1/4/2023) and dated with a discard date of 1/11 (1/11/2023). EI #5 said these should not be in here, they should have been thrown away. EI #5, the Dietary Manager, was interviewed on 1/24/2023 at 5:22 PM. EI #5 was asked about the package of boiled eggs, labeled as opened on 1/4/2023 and with a use by date of 1/11/2023, which were in the Walk-in Cooler on 1/24/2023. EI #5 said the boiled eggs were clearly expired and needed to be thrown out. EI #4, the Registered Dietitian, was interviewed on 1/24/2023 at 5:25 PM. When asked about the package of boiled eggs with the with a use by date of 1/11/2023 that were in the Walk-in Cooler on 1/24/2023, EI #4 said there was potential for cross-contamination and possibly Salmonella (a food-borne illness bacteria). 3.) The 2017 Food Code of the U.S. Public Health Service and the FDA included the following: . Temperature and Time Control 3-501.11 Frozen Food. Stored frozen FOODS shall be maintained frozen. 3-501.16 Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding. (A) . TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD shall be maintained: . (2) At 5ºC [Centigrade] (41ºF) or less. The facility's policy for Food Storage: Cold Foods, revised 4/2018, included the following: Policy Statement All Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) foods, frozen and refrigerated, will be appropriately stored in accordance with guidelines of the FDA Food Code. Procedures . 2. All perishable foods will be maintained at a temperature of 41º F or below . 3. Freezer temperatures will be maintained at a temperature of 0 º F or below. On 1/24/2023 at 5:35 PM, the residents' refrigerator on Nursing Station #2 was observed with EI #13, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). EI #13 said the refrigeration temperature was 54 degrees Fahrenheit and the freezer was 15 degrees Fahrenheit. When asked what should the refrigerator's temperature be, EI #13 replied 32 to 41 degrees Fahrenheit. When asked what should the freezer's temperature be, EI #13 said no greater than zero degrees Fahrenheit. EI #13 said nine ice cream sandwiches and three individual chocolate/vanilla ice creams were in the freezer. Upon being asked how did the ice cream feel, EI #13 said it was not solid and she was able to squeeze it easily. EI #13 further said the ice cream needed to be thrown away. When asked how did the ice cream sandwiches feel, EI #13 said soft, not frozen. EI #13 said ice cream should be frozen solid and you should not be able to squeeze it. EI #13 said the refrigerator should never be 54 degrees Fahrenheit. EI #13 did not know how long the temperature had been 15 degrees Fahenheit in the freezer and 54 degrees Fahrenheit in the refrigerator. EI #13 said the risk of the freezer being 15 degrees Fahrenheit and the refrigerator being 54 degrees Fahrenheit was the food inside not being at the proper temperature. EI #13 said the refrigerator contained a 46-ounce jar of apple sauce that was 75% full, a box containing three chicken fingers, one 8-ounce nutritional shake, three individual coffee creamers, two small containers of Yoplait peach/strawberry yogurt, and a 46-ounce container of thickened apple juice. EI #13 was asked what was the risk of the freezer not being 0º degrees F or below and the refrigerator not being between 32º to 41º F. EI #13 said the residents could get sick. During an interview on 1/25/2023 at 2:50 PM, EI #5, the Dietary Manager, said the 54 degree temperature reading for the Nursing Station #2 residents' refrigerator was too high. EI #5 said everything in the refrigerator was compromised due to biological growth. During an interview on 1/25/2023 at 3:07 PM, EI #4, the Registered Dietitian, said the items in the Nursing Station #2 residents' refrigerator were at risk for causing food borne illness due to an unsafe temperature range. 4.) The 2017 Food Code of the U.S. Public Health Service and the FDA included the following: . Temperature and Time Control 3-501.11 Frozen Food. Stored frozen FOODS shall be maintained frozen. 3-501.16 Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding. (A) . TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD shall be maintained: . (2) At 5ºC [Centigrade] (41ºF) or less. The facility's policy for Food Storage: Cold Foods, revised 4/2018, included the following: Policy Statement All Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) foods, frozen and refrigerated, will be appropriately stored in accordance with guidelines of the FDA Food Code. Procedures . 4. An accurate thermometer will be kept in each refrigerator and freezer. A written record of daily temperatures will be recorded. On 1/24/2023 at 6:08 PM, the residents' refrigerator on Nursing Station #1 was observed with EI #12, a LPN. Upon being asked what was the temperature of the refrigerator, EI #12 said she did not know because there was no thermometer. When asked why was there no thermometer, EI #12 said she did not know. EI #12 further said night shift checked the refrigerators. On 1/25/2023 at 8:00 AM, the residents' refrigerator on Nursing Station #1 was observed with EI #2, the Director of Nursing. When asked what was the temperature in the refrigerator, EI #2 said she did not know. EI #2 further said there was no thermometer in the refrigerator and she did not know why there was no thermometer. Upon being asked how was staff supposed to know what the temperature was inside the refrigerator, EI #2 said she did not know. EI #2 said the risk of not checking the refrigerator temperature was the food not being at the correct temperature. During an interview on 1/25/2023 at 2:50 PM, EI #5, the Dietary Manager, said without a thermometer in the refrigerator you cannot verify the temperature and therefore cannot verify that the food is being kept at a safe temperature. During an interview on 1/25/2023 at 3:07 PM, EI #4, the Registered Dietitian, said the Nursing Station #1 residents' refrigerator needed to be in a safe temperature range, otherwise the food items were at risk for foodborne illness. EI #4 said the refrigerator temperature needed to be monitored via a thermometer.
Jun 2021 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. RI #79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis to include Dysphagia, Oral Phase and Oropharyngeal Phase. A rev...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. RI #79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis to include Dysphagia, Oral Phase and Oropharyngeal Phase. A review of RI #79's Quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Date of 05/16/21, revealed RI #79 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 indicating severely impaired cognitive status and was totally dependent on staff for eating. On 06/24/21 at 06:11 PM surveyor observed EI #5 standing while feeding RI #79 during mealtime. On 06/24/21 at 2:51 PM, an interview was conducted with EI #5. During the interview EI #5 was asked, were you supposed to stand or sit when feeding a resident. EI #5 replied, sit. EI #5 was asked, were you standing or sitting while feeding RI #79. EI #5 replied, standing. EI #5 was asked, how would it make you feel if someone was standing and feeding you. EI #5 replied, uncomfortable. On 06/25/21 at 7:56 AM, an interview was conducted with EI #2, a license staff member. EI #2 was asked, when feeding a resident should you sit or stand. EI #2 replied, sit for dignity issues. EI #2 was asked when should you stand. EI #2 replied, you should not stand unless the resident is standing. Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. A licensed staff member did not write on a dressing that Resident Identifier (RI) #44 was wearing during the wound care observation on 06/24/21, and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) did not stand while feeding RI #79. This affected RI #44, one of two sampled residents observed during wound care and RI #79 one of four residents observed during dining. Findings include: RI #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She has a diagnosis to include, Pressure Ulcer of other site, unstageable. RI #44's Physician Orders dated 6-8-21 revealed, . Cleanse sacrum wound with Normal saline (NS), pat dry, apply skin prep to periwound, and Medihoney to wound bed once daily and as needed (PRN) . On 6-24-21 at 4:45 PM an observation was made of RI #44's sacral area during wound Care. Employee Identifier (EI) #2 was observed dating and initialing the wound dressing after it was placed on RI # 44. On 6/24/21 at 07:51 AM, an interview was conducted with EI #2. During the interview, EI #2 stated, she dated the wound dressing after it was placed on RI # 44's sacral area. EI #2 was asked what harm could have been caused to the resident. EI #2 stated that it could have possibly caused further injury to the pressure injury and now she realized that it was a dignity concern as well.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0602 (Tag F0602)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation of Property, review ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation of Property, review of the facility's investigative file and review of information from the Alabama Department of Public Health's (ADPH) Online Reporting System, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) # 149's cell phone was not taken by Employee Identifier (EI) # 17, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) without permission and for personal use. This deficient practice affected RI # 149, one of one sampled residents having their own cell phone in their room. Findings Include: The facility's policy titled, Abuse Neglect and Misappropriation of Property, with a last revised date of 05/08/19, revealed the following: . Definitions: Misappropriation of Resident Property: Is defined as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent . RI # 149 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 05/28/2021. The ADPH Online Facility Report Incident dated 03/22/2021, identified . Incident Type .Misappropriation of Resident Property .Incident Detail . Narrative summary of Incident: Phone was plugged in another room. Researching the phone gallery indicated the phone belonged to (Name of resident) RI #149. Further investigation of Cash App, Facebook, Onshift, messaging, calls and cover photo indicates (Name of employee) EI #17 had been using RI #149 phone for personal reasons. The facility's investigative file dated 3/24/2021 included an interview with EI #17, regarding the cell phone located with her information and RI #149's information. EI #17 indicated she had used RI #149's phone saying that her phone was broken and she just used her cash app to get some gas to go home. When asked if RI #149 knew she used the resident's phone she said she didn't know. She wasn't sure if the resident was paying attention or not. When EI #17 was asked if she downloaded Cash App, she replied she did. When asked if she downloaded the onshift App, EI #17 replied she may have. EI #17 indicated she forgot to sign out of the phone and both phones sync (synchronize) which allowed messaging, emails, photos, and other information on RI #149's phone. On 06/23/2021 at 6:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with EI #18 , a CNA. EI #18 said, EI #19, another CNA found the resident's cell phone and she told EI #19 to take it to EI #1 the Administrator. EI #19 asked EI #18 how this phone get into this room. EI #18 told EI #19 she did not know. EI #18 said she took the cell phone to EI #1 and showed her how to find who the owner of the phone was. EI #18 said she also showed the EI #1 how to see who had been using the cell phone. EI #18 said the cell phone belong RI #149. EI #18 also said that the resident was unaware the cell phone was missing and rarely used the phone. On 06/23/2021 at 7:01 p.m., an interview was conducted with EI #19. EI #19 stated one day she was changing RI #91 and the phone was charging behind the resident's door. She (EI #19) took the phone to EI #1 after showing it to EI #18. EI #19 stated the resident had asked her to charge the cell phone, this is when she noticed the cell phone was missing. RI #149 told her somebody was getting the cell phone repaired. EI #19 stated she found the cell phone during her 4:00 p.m. rounds. On 06/24/2021 at 2:41 p.m., an interview was conducted with EI #1. EI #1 stated EI #19 found the resident's phone. EI #1 stated EI #19 said the cell phone was plugged into an outlet in another resident's room. EI #1 said EI #19 showed her the pictures of RI #149's family on the cell phone. EI #1 said, EI #19 asked EI #18 is she could show EI #1 the other pictures on the cell phone. This is when EI #1 said she became aware of the following information belonging to EI #17. EI #18 showed her (EI #1) pictures of EI #17 on the cover of the cell phone. EI #18 also showed EI #1 my profile and messages that stated, Having to call out. Woke up to my daughter throwing up with fever (EI #17 last name). EI # 1 stated this statement was what made her feel like EI #17 used the phone off of the facility's property. EI #1 stated then EI #18 showed her the apps. EI #1 stated one app was the PayActiv. This app showed you your pay stub and if you wanted to borrow money before payday you could. EI #1 stated she showed her OnShift. This was where the employees get their schedule. EI #1 stated the last thing EI #18 showed her was the Cash App. This was where you can pay others online. EI #1 stated that EI #17 admitted to her that she had used RI #149's cell phone because her phone had a broken screen. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report AL00041346.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and a review of facility the policy titled, Weight Monitoring the facility failed to ensure R...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and a review of facility the policy titled, Weight Monitoring the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #201's weight was obtained on admission and the week of 6/21/2021. This had the potential to affect one of four residents sampled residents whose weights were reviewed for potential weight loss. Findings Include: A facility policy titled Weight Monitoring with a last revised date of 7/11/18 revealed: . POLICY STATEMENT To identify residents who are at nutritional risk. Resident weight will be monitored weekly upon admission/readmission for four weeks . GUIDELINE: 1. New admissions and readmissions will be weighed upon admission and weekly X 4. The admission weight is the baseline weight (#1) and there are to be 4 more weekly weights obtained to total 5 consecutive weights. RI #201 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Acute diastolic (congestive) heart failure and Vitamin deficiency unspecified. A review of documented weight revealed RI #201 weight was documented on 6/14/2021. No other weights were recorded. On 6/24/21 at 4:56 PM an interview was conducted with Employee Identifier (EI) #3, Registered Nurse (RN). EI #3 was asked, when were weights documented for EI #201. RI #3 replied, 6/14/21. EI #3 was asked, who performed weight measurements and when. EI #3 replied, either the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) or nurses together. It was done when it was flagged on Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) and was usually on dayshift. EI #3 was asked, how did those staff know who to weigh and when. EI #3 replied, it flagged on eMAR and nurse delegated to CNA if appropriate. EI #3 was asked, did RI #201's weights flag on eMar. EI #3 replied, yes, on 6/9/21, 6/16/21, and 6/23/21. EI #3 was asked, what was documented on those days regarding those weights. EI #3 replied, it was documented as on hold by EI #11, RN all three times. EI #3 was asked, why would she have documented it as on hold. EI #3 replied, she did not know. On 6/25/21 at 7:22 AM an interview was conducted with EI #14, CNA. EI #14 was asked, who was responsible for weighing residents. EI #14 replied, the CNAs. EI #14 was asked, how did the CNAs know who to weigh. EI #14 replied, the Dietitian manager EI #7 gave them a list. EI #14 was asked, had RI #201 been on that list. EI #14 replied, he/she could have been on one of her off days. EI #14 was asked, had she ever weighed RI #201. EI #14 replied, no. EI #14 was asked, would RI #201 refuse to be weighed. EI #14 replied, she did not think so. On 6/25/21 at 9:54 AM an interview was conducted with EI #11, RN. EI #11 was asked, when was RI #201 weighed. EI #11 replied, the orders were to weigh on admission and then weekly times four weeks. EI #11 was asked, why was it documented on 6/9/21, 6/16/21, and 6/23/21 that the weight was on hold. EI #11 replied, she was told not to document weights and always document it as on hold; the eMar flags from order. EI #11 was asked, what was the process for weighing residents. EI #11 replied, the dietitian makes a list on Tuesday and gives it to each station, the nurses looked at the list and let CNAs now who to weigh, the CNAs take the resident to the dietitian's office where the scale was and weighed the resident and the dietitian documented it. EI #11 was asked, who was responsible to ensure residents were weighed as ordered by physician. EI #11 replied, it was a team effort. On 6/25/21 at 12:23 PM an interview was conducted with EI #7, Dietary Manager. EI #7 was asked, who was responsible for obtaining weights. EI #7 replied, nursing; the restorative nurse did previously, but they quit about three months ago. EI #7 was asked, when were residents weighed. EI #7 replied, new admits were weighed weekly for four weeks and then monthly unless triggered for weight loss and the weight loss residents stay weekly. EI #7 was asked, who compiled the list of residents who needed weights measured. EI #7 replied, she did. EI #7 was asked, why was RI #201 not on the list. EI #7 replied she had been working in the kitchen non-stop due to lack of staff. EI #7 was asked, when was RI #201 weighed. E I#7 replied, the only documented weight was June 14th. E I#7 was asked, when should RI #201 have been weighed. EI #7 replied, on admission and then weekly. EI #7 was asked, what was the current process for identifying residents who require weekly or monthly weights, communicating which residents need to be weighed, staff measuring resident's weight, and documenting weight. EI #7 replied, new admits were weighed upon admission and then weekly, if weights were stable week to week and after four weeks and resident had not gained/lost three percent in one week then they were changed to monthly; every resident should be weighed at least monthly; she made a list weekly by hall and posted it for nursing to obtain weight; nursing staff brought resident in wheelchair to dietary managers office and used wheelchair scale to measure weight; bedbound residents were weighed using a lift; the staff weighing the resident wrote it down or verbally told her and she entered the weights into the Electronic Health Record (EHR). On 6/25/21 at 3:18 PM an interview was conducted with EI #2, RN, Director of Nursing. EI #2 was asked, what was the facility's process for obtaining resident's weights. EI #2 replied, on admission all residents are weighed within 24 hours and then weekly for 4 weeks. EI #2 was asked, who obtained the weights. EI #2 replied, the CNAs. EI #2 was asked, how was that communicated with the CNAs. EI #2 replied, the dietitian made a list of residents that needed weekly weights and gave the list to the charge nurse who delegated to the CNAs. EI #2 was asked, what was the potential harm to a resident when not weighed but once within 16 days after being admitted . EI #2 replied, potential of unmonitored weight loss.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #22's tube feeding was...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #22's tube feeding was administered as prescribed. This affected one of three residents sampled for tube feeding. Findings Include: RI #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last re-admitted on [DATE]. RI #22 had diagnosis to include Dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase. A review of RI #22's Physician Order Report revealed a physician's order with start date of 3/30/2021 JEVITY 1.5 liquid; . Special Instruction: DIRECTIONS: GIVE 60 MILLILITER (ML) PER HOUR X 20 HOURS WITH FLUSH of 50 ML OF WATER PER HOUR X 20 HOURS VIA GASTRIC TUBE. START AT 10AM STOP AT 6AM DAILY . On 6/25/21 at 7:15 AM an observation was made of RI #22's tube feeding being administered via pump, Jevity 1.5 infusing at 60ml/hour with 50 ml/hour water flush. On 6/25/21 at 7:34 AM an interview was conducted with EI #4, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). EI #4 was asked, what was the order for tube feeding for RI #22. EI #4 replied, it was Jevity 1.5 at 60 ml/hour with a 50 ml flush of water ever hour; the dayshift nurse hangs and starts at 10 AM and night shift nurse stops and takes it down at 6 AM. EI #4 was asked, why was it not being administered as ordered. EI #4 replied, she did not know why EI #15, Registered Nurse hung a new bottle instead of taking it down. EI #4 was asked, who was responsible to ensure residents receive tube feeding as ordered. EI #4 replied, the nurse. EI #4 was asked, what was the potential harm for resident when tube feeding was not stopped at 6 am as ordered. EI #4 replied, the resident could vomit from stomach being too full and possibly aspirate. On 6/25/21 at 7:53 AM an interview was conducted with EI #15. EI #15 was asked, who was responsible to ensure tube feedings are administered as ordered. EI #15 replied, the nurse. EI #15 was asked, when should RI #22's tube feeding infuse. EI #15 replied, it stopped at 6 AM and restarted at 10 AM. EI #15 was asked, who was responsible for stopping tube feeding at 6 AM today. EI #15 replied, me. EI #15 was asked, why was it important to turn tube feeding infusion off at 6 AM and restart at 10 AM. EI #15 replied, it gave the body a chance to process the food. EI #15 was asked, why was it not stopped this morning at 6 AM. E I#15 replied, he got behind because there was a code last night. On 6/25/21 at 8:22 AM an interview was conducted with EI #2, RN, Director of Nursing. EI #2 was asked, when should tube feeding orders be followed. EI #2 replied, all the time. EI #2 what was the potential harm when a resident gets tube feeding beyond the ordered time. EI #2 replied, the resident could have increased residual and weight gain.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0697 (Tag F0697)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and a facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans the facility failed to ensure a care p...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and a facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans the facility failed to ensure a care plan was implemented for pain on Resident Identifier (RI) #9. A review of facility policy, last revised on 7-19-18, revealed, Comprehensive Care Plans . POLICY STATEMENT A person-centered Comprehensive Care Plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident. The care plan will include how the facility will assist the resident to meet their needs, goals and preferences. This affected RI #9, one of one resident observed for pain management. RI #9 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction. On 6/22/21 at 5:48 PM Resident Identifier (RI) #9 pushed call button and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) answered the call light, RI #9 asked for pain medication. On 6/25/21 at 2:47 PM RI #9 stated it hurt in the shoulder, RI #9 was asked, how bad was your pain on a scale of 1-10, 10 being the most. RI #9 replied, about an eight. On 6/25/21 at 02:41 PM interview was conducted with Employee Identifier (EI) #18, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). EI #18 was asked, how long have you worked here. EI #18 replied, One year. EI #18 was asked, did RI #9 complain of pain. EI #18 replied, every evening about 5:00 or 5:30 PM. EI #18 was asked, when RI #9 called you into the room did RI #9 complain of pain. EI #18 replied, yes. EI #18 was asked, who did you tell. EI #18 replied, a nurse, whoever was on this hall and if they were not on the hall, she would tell the other nurse. EI #18 was asked, how often did the resident complain of pain. EI #18 replied, every evening RI #9 complained of pain. On 6/25/21 at 2:53 PM an interview was conducted with EI #4, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). EI #4 was asked, have you ever taken care of RI # 9. EI #4 replied, yes. EI #4 was asked, did RI #9 complain of pain. EI #4 replied, yes. EI #4 was asked, what did you do if resident had pain. EI #4 replied, RI #9 had an order for Aleve, so give as indicated. On 6/25/21 at 3:48 PM an interview was conducted with EI #19, LPN. EI #19 was asked, how long have you worked here. EI #19 replied, November. EI #19 was asked, what shift do you work. EI #19 replied, 6:00AM-6:00PM. EI #19 was asked, have you taken care of RI #9. EI #19 replied, yes. EI #19 was asked, did RI #9 ever complain of pain. EI #19 replied, yes. EI #19 was asked, how often did the resident have pain. EI #19 replied, every morning with regular meds. EI #19 was asked, what did you give RI #9 for pain. EI #19 replied, Naproxen. EI #19 was asked, how often did RI #9 get that for pain. EI #19 replied two times a day. EI #19 was asked, did you follow a care plan for RI #9's pain. EI #19 replied, she did not know if pain was on RI #9's care plan. On 6/25/21 at 4:20 PM an interview was conducted with EI # 3. EI #3 was asked, who was responsible for ensuring residents care plans are implemented and specific to resident's needs. EI #3 replied, Minimal Data Set (MDS) coordinators and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). EI #3 was asked, when should a resident with pain have interventions care planned to address pain. EI #3 replied, when pain was noted. EI #3 was asked, did RI #9 have care planned interventions that address the resident's pain. EI #3 replied, RI #9 did now. EI #3 was asked, when was that care plan implemented. EI #3 replied, 6/25/21. EI #3 was asked, why did RI #9 not have care planned interventions that addressed pain. EI #3 replied, because the MDS coordinator is human.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Dental Services (Tag F0791)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy titled Dental Services the facility failed to assist Resident I...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy titled Dental Services the facility failed to assist Resident Identifier (RI) #201 to a scheduled dental appointment on 6/21/2021. Findings Include: A facility policy titled Dental Services with a last reviewed date of 6/15/18 revealed: POLICY STATEMENT The facility must assist residents in obtaining routine . dental care. GUIDELINE: . 5. The facility will assist the resident in making appointments and arranging for transportation to and from the dentist's office. RI #201 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Acute diastolic (congestive) heart failure and Vitamin deficiency unspecified. A review of the 24-Hour Report Book revealed: for the date 6/17/21 and 6/20/21 that RI #201 had a dental appointment on Monday 21st and was to be ready at 11:00 AM. On 6/23/21 at 12:30 PM, RI #201's family reported to the surveyor that since the resident was admitted he/she has missed three dental appointments. An immediate observation was made of RI #201's oral cavity. RI #201 was observed to have two loose teeth on the bottom. On 6/23/21 at 6:18 PM an interview was conducted with Employee Identifier (EI) #11, Registered Nurse. EI #11 was asked, who was responsible for scheduling appointments and transportation for residents. EI #11 replied, the nurse who was first notified of the need scheduled appointments as needed. EI #11 was asked, where was it documented. EI #11 replied, it was documented in nursing notes and 24-hour report, it was also reported during walking rounds. EI #11 was asked, how would surveyor know which appointments were scheduled for RI #201. EI #11 replied, it would be in nursing notes or 24-hour report. EI #11 was asked, did RI #201 have any appointments in 24-hour report book. EI #11 replied, on 6/20/21 the book has recorded, RI #201 appointment on Monday June 21. Dentist appointment. Transportation service will pick up and that is the only appointment in the book except today's reschedule 6/28/21. EI #11 was asked, when did RI #201 miss a dental appointment. EI #11 replied, he/she did today because transportation service never came. On 6/24/21 at 3:30 PM an interview was conducted with EI #12, Licensed Physical Therapist Assistant. EI #12 was asked, what could she report about RI #201's dental appointment. RI #12 replied, on 6/21/21, she knew about the appointment and RI #13, Certified Occupational Therapist Assistant (COTA) was helping with bath, the nurse was helping with changing sacral dressing, and the family was bringing clothes; she thought, transportation service had been scheduled for the appointment at 1:00 and one hour before was their standard arrival time. Transportation service arrived at 11:15 and would not wait. The nurse, tried to call to get them to come back, but was not successful. EI #12 added, RI #201 would have been ready by 12:00. On 6/24/21 at 3:34PM an interview was conducted with RI #13, COTA. RI #13 reported, she assisted with RI #201's bath before the appointment, transportation service arrived at 11:15am and RI #201 was not ready, so the transportation service left. On 6/25/21 at 9:25 AM an interview was conducted with a representative of the transportation service. The representative was asked, what was the schedule for pickup on 6/21 for RI #201. The representative reported, 11:15 pickup time for 12:15 appointment. On 6/25/21 at 3:26 PM an interview was conducted with EI #2, RN, Director of Nursing. EI #2 was asked, what was the facility's policy for ensuring residents were able to go to the dentist as needed. EI #2 replied, the facility had to assist in ensuring the resident gets to the appointment. EI #2 was asked, what happened with RI #201's dental appointment on 6/21/21. EI #2 replied, she was on the hall Monday and transportation service was there and she told the nurse that the transportation service was there; she went to check on the resident's status and she was dressed and in the bed. EI #2 was asked, when residents are scheduled for an appointment and has transportation service pickup, what was the facility's procedure. EI #2 replied, the appointment is normally 24-Hour Report book for when they will be picked up; the CNAs get them up early and 45 minutes to an hour before the scheduled pick-up time staff have the resident in the lobby ready because we have a history of transportation service leaving our patients. EI #2 was asked, why did some staff think the pickup was at 12:00 when it was written in book that it was at 11:00. EI #2 replied, the nurse assigned to RI #201's care was not a regular nurse in that area, a charge nurse called out, and the unit supervisor was not available.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and a review of a facility policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, the facility failed to ens...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and a review of a facility policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, the facility failed to ensure Employee Identifier(EI) #5, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) washed her hands before feeding Resident Identifier (RI) #90. This affected RI #90, one of four residents sampled for meal observations. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene revised August 2019, includes, Policy Statement This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. 7. Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or, alternatively, soap (antimicrobial or non antimicrobial) and water for the following situations: . p. Before and after assisting a resident with meals; . RI #90 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include nutritional deficiency and unspecified lack of coordination. On 6/23/21 at 6:19 PM, EI #5, CNA was observed feeding another resident, taking the tray and placing it on a dirty cart without washing or sanitizing his/her hands before going into RI #90's room. EI #5 then started to feed RI #90. On 6/23/21 at 6:21 PM an interview was conducted with EI #5. EI #5 was asked, how long have you worked here. EI #5 replied, six years. EI #5 was asked, when did you wash your hands before entering RI #90's room to feed RI #90. EI #5 replied, before the trays came out. EI #5 was asked, did you wash or sanitize your hands before going into RI #90's room. EI #5 replied, no. EI#5 was asked, what can happen if you do not wash your hands before feeding a resident. EI #5 replied, cross contamination. On 6/25/21 at 7:56 AM an interview with EI #2, Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted. EI #2 was asked, when should you perform hand hygiene. EI#2 replied, before and after you touch a resident and if your hands are soiled. EI #2 was asked, when should you perform hand hygiene before feeding a resident. EI #2 replied, you should perform hand hygiene before doing anything to the resident.
Oct 2019 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and a facility policies titled, Medication Administration General Guidelines and Medication St...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and a facility policies titled, Medication Administration General Guidelines and Medication Storage the the facility failed to ensure: 1. Employee Identifier (EI) #3, did not leave the medication cart unlocked and out of her site (entered a resident's room to administer medications) on 10/3/19 on the 200 Hall and 2. the Medication Storage Room on Nurses Station 3 did not contain expired medication, including one in the refrigerator and an emergency diabetic kit (with eight medications) in the cabinet. These deficient practices had the potential to affect 17 out of 17 residents on the 200 Hall and affected 1 of 1 Medication Storage room observed. Findings Include: 1) A review of a facility policy titled, Medication Administration General Guidelines, with a date of 09/18, documented: . PROCEDURES . Medication Administration: .8. Check expiration date on package/container. No expired medications will be administered to a resident . 17. During administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse . The cart must be clearly visible to the personnel administering medications when unlocked. And a review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage ,with a date of 09/18, revealed, 3. Medication rooms, cabinets and medication supplies should remain locked when not in use or unattended by persons with authorized access. On 10/03/19 at 08:40 a.m., a Surveyor observed EI #3, RN (Registered Nurse) walked away from her medication cart and left the medication cart unlocked. On 10/03/19 at 08:40 am, another Surveyor walked down hall 2 and a med cart was observed on the on left side of hall between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. One resident was observed in a wheel chair and rolling himself down the opposite end of the hall and one visitor walked out of a room directly past the medication cart. The Surveyor observed the medication cart unlocked. On 10/03/19 at 08:42 am, an interviewed was conducted with EI #3. Standing in front of unlocked med cart, the surveyor asked EI# 3 was that her med cart. EI# 3 replied, yes it was. EI# 3 was asked, what med cart was it. EI# 3 replied, Station 1, 200 hall. EI# 3 was asked, when she returned from giving medications to a resident, was the med cart locked or unlocked. EI# 3 replied, it was unlocked. EI# 3 was asked, why was the medication cart unlocked. EI# 3 replied, she pressed to lock the cart and she did not lock the cart; it was a mistake. EI# 3 was asked, what was the potential harm leaving a medication cart unlocked. EI# 3 replied, any resident could come by and take the meds or a visitor could come by and take the meds and take a card of medication for themselves. 2) And a review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage ,with a date of 09/18, revealed, .14. Outdated, . are immediately removed from stock, disposed of according to procedures . On 10/02/19 at 4:58 p.m., the Surveyor was accompanied to the 3rd Nursing Station Medication Room with EI#4. The surveyor and EI# 4 observed the following: - Gluca Gen Hypo kit 1 mg (milligram) per vial expired 6/2019; - 1 ml (milliliter) sterile water expires 6/20/19; - 1 Gluca Gen 1 mg per vial expired 6/20/19; - a plastic box DIABETIC EMERGENCY DRUG KIT CONTENTS (plastic lock remained intact) containing: 3- Dextrose 50 % Syringe 50 ml 9/30/15 3- Insta-glucose Tube 31 GM 09/30/16 2- GlucaGen Hypo kit 1 mg per vial expired 09/30/16. At that time EI #4 was asked, what expired medication was in the medication refrigerator. EI# 4 replied, one container of glycogen. EI #4 was asked, what was the harm with the expired glycogen being in the med storage refrigerator. EI #4 replied, if someone had used the glycogen it may not have been effective. EI# 4 was asked, what emergency kit was in the cabinet in the medication storage room. EI #4 replied, a diabetic emergency kit. EI #4 was asked how many medications were expired in the diabetic emergency kit. EI #4 replied, eight. EI #4 was asked, what was the potential harm with having the expired emergency diabetic kit in the cabinet. EI #4 replied, staff could have used the expired medication for a resident and the medication may not have been effective. On 10/3/19 at 1:51 p.m., an interviewed was conducted with EI #, Director of Nursing. EI #1 was asked who's medication was stored in the medication storage refrigerators. EI #1 replied, resident's medications. EI #1 was asked what was the potential harm for expired medications being in the refrigerator. EI #1 replied, if given medication to a resident for hypoglycemia it would not work. EI#1 was asked should the diabetic emergency kit that was expired have been stored in the medication storage cabinet. EI #1 replied, no it should have been brought to her office and put in the storage room. EI#1 was asked what was the potential harm with expired medications stored in the Medication Storage room. EI #1 said, it could have been given to a resident.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 20 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $15,593 in fines. Above average for Alabama. Some compliance problems on record.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 3 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Rocket City Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns ROCKET CITY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Alabama, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Rocket City Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center Staffed?

CMS rates ROCKET CITY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 77%, which is 31 percentage points above the Alabama average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 87%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Rocket City Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center?

State health inspectors documented 20 deficiencies at ROCKET CITY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER during 2019 to 2023. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 17 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Rocket City Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center?

ROCKET CITY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by VENZA CARE MANAGEMENT, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 159 certified beds and approximately 107 residents (about 67% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in HUNTSVILLE, Alabama.

How Does Rocket City Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center Compare to Other Alabama Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Alabama, ROCKET CITY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (77%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Rocket City Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the facility's high staff turnover rate.

Is Rocket City Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, ROCKET CITY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Alabama. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Rocket City Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center Stick Around?

Staff turnover at ROCKET CITY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER is high. At 77%, the facility is 31 percentage points above the Alabama average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 87%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Rocket City Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center Ever Fined?

ROCKET CITY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER has been fined $15,593 across 3 penalty actions. This is below the Alabama average of $33,235. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Rocket City Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center on Any Federal Watch List?

ROCKET CITY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.