SOUTHLAND NURSING HOME
Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.
Southland Nursing Home in Marion, Alabama, has a Trust Grade of B+, which means it is above average and recommended for families looking for care options. It ranks #29 out of 223 facilities in the state, placing it in the top half, but it is the second-best option in Perry County. The facility is experiencing a concerning trend, with issues increasing from 1 in 2019 to 2 in 2021, and it has received $5,244 in fines, which is higher than 80% of Alabama facilities, indicating potential compliance problems. Staffing is a weakness here, rated at 2 out of 5 stars and having less RN coverage than 82% of facilities in the state, although the turnover rate is excellent at 0%. Specific incidents include a resident's call light being out of reach, which could prevent them from calling for help, and a nurse failing to wash their hands after removing gloves, posing a risk for infection. While the home has strengths in overall quality ratings and a good environment, these concerns should be carefully considered by families.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Alabama
- #29/223
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $5,244 in fines. Lower than most Alabama facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 25 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Alabama. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ○ Average
- 7 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 7 deficiencies on record
Apr 2021
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, review of Resident Identifier (RI) #14's medical record and the facility's policy titled NURSE...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, review of Resident Identifier (RI) #46's medical record and the facility's policy titled, Hand...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2019
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0808
(Tag F0808)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, interviews, and a facility policy titled, PLANNED MENUS, the facility failed to ensure RI (...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2018
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, medical record review,and a review of the facility's policy titled, RESIDENT PRIVACY POLICY & (...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and a review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage, the facility failed to ensure that the locked medication box in the medication refrigerator was secur...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, medical record review, a review of the facility's policy titled, HAND WASHING POLICY & (and) PR...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, interviews and review of the facility's policy titled, Food and Beverage Labeling Policy, the facility failed to ensure bags of food items in the walk in cooler and the chest fr...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (88/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Alabama.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
About This Facility
What is Southland's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SOUTHLAND NURSING HOME an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Alabama, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Southland Staffed?
CMS rates SOUTHLAND NURSING HOME's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Southland?
State health inspectors documented 7 deficiencies at SOUTHLAND NURSING HOME during 2018 to 2021. These included: 7 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Southland?
SOUTHLAND NURSING HOME is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 91 certified beds and approximately 62 residents (about 68% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MARION, Alabama.
How Does Southland Compare to Other Alabama Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Alabama, SOUTHLAND NURSING HOME's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0 and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Southland?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Southland Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SOUTHLAND NURSING HOME has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Alabama. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Southland Stick Around?
SOUTHLAND NURSING HOME has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Southland Ever Fined?
SOUTHLAND NURSING HOME has been fined $5,244 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Alabama average of $33,131. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Southland on Any Federal Watch List?
SOUTHLAND NURSING HOME is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.