SEARHC SITKA LONG TERM CARE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Searhc Sitka Long Term Care holds an impressive Trust Grade of A, indicating it is highly recommended and performs excellently in various aspects of care. It ranks #4 out of 20 facilities in Alaska, placing it in the top half of the state, and is the only option in Sitka County, showing limited competition. However, the facility's trend is concerning, as issues increased from 2 in 2024 to 3 in 2025, suggesting some deterioration in care quality. Staffing is a strong point, with a 5/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 29%, which is significantly lower than the state average, meaning staff members are familiar with residents’ needs. On the downside, there were several incidents noted by inspectors, including a failure to maintain resident dignity during dining and not properly assessing medication self-administration capabilities for some residents, which could lead to medication errors.
- Trust Score
- A
- In Alaska
- #4/20
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 29% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 19 points below Alaska's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Alaska facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 167 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Alaska nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ○ Average
- 7 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (29%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (29%)
19 points below Alaska average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
No Significant Concerns Identified
This facility shows no red flags. Among Alaska's 100 nursing homes, only 1% achieve this.
The Ugly 7 deficiencies on record
Apr 2025
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed ensure self-administration of medication was clinically appropriate for one resident (#11), out of five residents reviewed for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plans to include medication self-administration for two residents (#s 3 and 11), out of 5 resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure the environm...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident dignity was maintained. Specificall...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment for all residents, ba...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#14), out of 9 sampled residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure measures were implemented to promote healing ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade A (93/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Alaska.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Alaska facilities.
- • 29% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 19 points below Alaska's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
About This Facility
What is Searhc Sitka Long Term Care's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SEARHC SITKA LONG TERM CARE an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Alaska, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Searhc Sitka Long Term Care Staffed?
CMS rates SEARHC SITKA LONG TERM CARE's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 29%, compared to the Alaska average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Searhc Sitka Long Term Care?
State health inspectors documented 7 deficiencies at SEARHC SITKA LONG TERM CARE during 2022 to 2025. These included: 6 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Searhc Sitka Long Term Care?
SEARHC SITKA LONG TERM CARE is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 19 certified beds and approximately 15 residents (about 79% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SITKA, Alaska.
How Does Searhc Sitka Long Term Care Compare to Other Alaska Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Alaska, SEARHC SITKA LONG TERM CARE's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.5, staff turnover (29%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Searhc Sitka Long Term Care?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Searhc Sitka Long Term Care Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SEARHC SITKA LONG TERM CARE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Alaska. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Searhc Sitka Long Term Care Stick Around?
Staff at SEARHC SITKA LONG TERM CARE tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 29%, the facility is 17 percentage points below the Alaska average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.
Was Searhc Sitka Long Term Care Ever Fined?
SEARHC SITKA LONG TERM CARE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Searhc Sitka Long Term Care on Any Federal Watch List?
SEARHC SITKA LONG TERM CARE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.