CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure advanced directive was accur...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure advanced directive was accurately documented for one of two sampled residents (#27). The census was 124. The deficient practice could result in residents receiving services which are not in accordance with their wishes.
Findings include:
Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, major depressive disorder, anemia and osteoarthritis.
Review of the Advance Directive form in resident's #27 clinical record revealed that the resident does not want cardiac resuscitation measures (CPR) and does not want artificial nutrition (tube feeding) if unable to accept nourishment by mouth. The form also revealed that consent was received from the resident's family member on [DATE] and the form was signed by the facility representative on [DATE].
However, a physician's order dated [DATE] stated CPR/Full Code.
Further review of the clinical record did not reveal the resident had changed the advance directive from DNR (Do Not resuscitate) to full code.
An interview was conducted with a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN/staff #28) on [DATE] at 11:35 AM, who stated advance directive is filled out on admission by the admission nurse and then an order is entered into PCC (Point Click Care/electronic record). Staff #28 stated the resident or resident's POA (Power of Attorney) can change the advance directive at any time. She stated in that case, a new form is signed and the resident clinical record is updated. The LPN stated she will look at the nursing assignment sheet or the PCC to look for a resident's code status. She then looked at the assignment sheet and stated that resident #27 is a full code. The LPN stated the code status in the resident's chart should match with what the resident or their POA signed on the advance directive form. Staff #28 looked at resident's #27 chart in PCC and stated that the resident has an order for full code and full code is listed therefore the resident is a full code. The LPN then reviewed the advance directive form signed on [DATE], and stated the resident representative signed for DNR. She stated the code status did not match and stated the resident records needed to be updated. The LPN stated if a resident received CPR when the resident had signed for DNR then it becomes a legal issue.
An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON/staff #133) on [DATE] at 11:19 AM. She stated the advance directive form is filled out on admission by the admission nurse and the admission nurse is the one placing the order. The DON stated then she will go through the admissions paperwork to make sure everything is correct and trust the staff that they completed the admission work. She stated that after the nurse informed her about resident #27 code status, she immediately checked, confirmed with the POA and corrected the resident's clinical record. The DON stated the facility was audited and there were no other issue with advance directive beside resident #27.
The facility policy titled Advance Directive Documentation revised on [DATE] stated that the admission coordinator, or social service director shall provide the resident or responsible agent information regarding the right to formulate an advance directive, inquire whether he/she has completed an advance directive and document in the resident health record.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensur...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of sexual abuse for one resident (#32) was reported to the State Agency. The deficient practice could result in allegations of abuse not being reported as mandated by federal guidelines.
Findings include:
Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder, delusional disorders, and cognitive communication deficit.
The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] included a brief interview mental status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS assessment also included the resident did not hallucinate or have delusions during the look-back period.
During an interview conducted with the resident on January 3, 2022 at 10:14 a.m., resident #32 stated that there are two guys that come into her room. She said that one of the men that came into her room the day before yesterday and tried to put his penis by her mouth. She said that she reported it and staff told her that they do not mean what they are doing. She stated that she is afraid of them, emotional, challenged to not go crazy.
An interview was conducted on January 5, 2022 at 10:21 a.m. with a certified nursing assistant (CNA/staff #116). She said last week she heard resident #32 screaming in her room. Staff #116 stated she went to the resident's room and the resident told her that a male resident was disrobing and exposing himself. Staff #116 stated the male resident was in the room but had on clothes. She also said that she has received training about abuse and she is supposed to tell the nurse/manager when a resident makes an allegation of abuse. The CNA stated that that she did not report it because it is standard behavior for that resident to wander and to remove clothing, and it is standard behavior for resident #32 to scream and make allegations. Staff #116 stated that since the resident still had his clothing on, she did not think that anything happened.
On January 6, 2022 at 10:24 a.m., an interview was conducted with another CNA (staff #4), who stated that she was told by another staff, but could not remember which staff, that resident #32 had reported a resident was in her room attempting to show his penis. She stated that she does not know what was done about the complaint.
On January 7, 2022 at 10:16 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON/staff #133). She stated the staff should have reported the allegation made by resident #32 to her, and she would have reported the allegation to the State Agency, Adult Protective Services, the Sheriff, and the Ombudsman.
The facility policy, Reporting Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime, revised November 15, 2018 stated it is the policy of this facility to protect its residents from abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. The facility likewise seeks to protect its residents from being subjected to incidents of crime, and to ensure that any such incidents (or reasonable suspicion of such incidents) are reported in a timely manner to the State Survey Agency and local law enforcement. When a covered individual (referred to herein as staff') suspects a crime has occurred against a
facility resident, he/she must report the incident to the State Survey Agency and local law enforcement. The staff member shall report the suspicion immediately but not later than 2 hours after the crime has been committed. Staff must also report the suspicion of an incident to the Administrator.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0637
(Tag F0637)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, review of facility policy, and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manua...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, review of facility policy, and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure that a significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed for one resident (#75) who was admitted on hospice services. The sample size was 25. The deficient practice could affect residents' continuity of care.
Findings include:
Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance, senile degeneration of brain, and major depressive disorder.
A physician order dated October 14, 2021 included an order for hospice to evaluate and treat.
A hospice informed consent revealed the consent was signed by the resident's legal guardian for a start of benefits on October 14, 2021.
Review of the physician order dated October 18, 2021 revealed the resident was with hospice, diagnosis senile degeneration of the brain.
A review of the Care Plan initiated on October 18, 2021 revealed the resident had a terminal prognosis and was admitted to hospice. The goal was that the resident's comfort would be maintained. Interventions included coordinating care with hospice to provide activities of daily living care to the resident, and comfort and support to the resident and family.
However, continued review of the clinical record did not reveal a significant change in status MDS assessment had been completed.
An interview was conducted on January 7, 2021 at 12:23 PM with the MDS Nurse (staff #7), the Director of Nursing (DON/staff #133), and Clinical Resource (staff #129). The MDS nurse stated that when a resident is admitted to hospice services, a significant change in status MDS assessment is required to be completed. The MDS nurse reviewed resident #75's record, and stated that there was not a significant change in status assessment for the start of hospice services on October 14, 2021 for this resident. Staff #129 stated that there was an oversight from an MDS resource nurse that reviews and audits MDS assessments for accuracy and completion.
The facility policy titled Frequency of Assessments revised May 2021 stated it is the policy of this facility that resident assessments shall be developed and reviewed on a timely basis, based on resident condition and RAI guidelines.
The RAI manual stated a significant change in status assessment is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice program or changes hospice providers and remains a resident at the nursing home.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control stan...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control standards were maintained when handling one resident's (#70) medication during medication administration. The sample size was 6. The deficient practice could result in transmission of infection.
Findings include:
Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following an unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting the right dominant side and essential hypertension.
Review of the clinical record revealed a physician order dated November 9, 2021 for Atenolol 50 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension.
A medication administration observation was conducted on January 5, 2022 at 7:57 AM with a Registered Nurse (RN/ Staff #118). Staff #118 was observed preparing medications for resident #70. During the observation, the RN was observed to take out the resident's medication named Atenolol (antihypertensive) tablet 50 mg. The medication was in a blister pack/card and was observed to have two tablets left in the card. The RN was then observed to pop one tablet of Atenolol 50 mg into the medication cup. During the observation, both of the tablets from the medication blister pack were observed to fall out of the card. One tablet was observed to fall in the medication cup and one tablet was observed to fall on top of the medication cart. The nurse was then observed to pick up the tablet that fell on top of the medication cart without gloves and place it back in the blister pack. The nurse was observed to tape the blister pack so that the medication would not fall out and placed it back inside the medication cart.
Following the observation, the nurse was asked about resident #70's Atenolol 50 mg tablet. The nurse stated that when she tried to pop one tablet of Atenolol into the medication cup, both of the tablets fell out. She stated one tablet went into the medication cup and one fell on top of the medication cart. She stated she placed the remaining tablet that fell on top of the cart into the blister card, taped it and placed the card back in with the resident's other medication cards.
An interview was conducted with the RN (staff #118) on January 5, 2022 at 9:57 AM. She stated when a medication pill falls on the floor, she will discard the medication. She stated if narcotics medications fall on the floor she will call the unit manager and waste the narcotics in sharps containers. She stated that she tries to pour medications directly from the container into the medication cup to minimize touching. The RN stated that she will discard medications that fall on top of the cart and tries not to touch the medication with her hands due to infection risks. She stated that she tries to keep her hands as clean as possible but her hands still will not stay clean as hands have many bacteria. She stated that if she touches the pill with her hands there is risk of infection transmission. When asked about the observation, she stated that she should have discarded the medication once it fell on the cart. The RN stated she saved the medication because the resident had only one medication left so she was worried that the resident might run out of the medication; therefore, she placed the tablet that fell on top of the cart back into the medication blister card. She stated it has not happened that the residents run out of medications but she was worried about it. She stated she has not discarded the medication. She stated she should have discarded the medication.
An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON/staff #133) on January 7, 2022 at 11:19 AM. She stated her expectation from the nurses is for them to perform hand hygiene before giving medications, after popping the medications and after giving the medication. She stated the staff should not be touching the pills with their hand. The DON stated that if the medication pill falls on the top of the medication cart, the pill should be wasted and not given to the resident. The DON stated there is a risk for infection if the nurses are touching the medication pills with their hand.
The facility's policy Medication Administration - Oral stated it is the policy of the facility to accurately prepare, administer and document oral medications. Wash hands or use hand sanitizer. Remove unit does medications from cards into med souffle cup for resident. The policy did not include the procedure to follow if the medication did not go into the medication cup.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that maintenance and housekeeping services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interio...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that maintenance and housekeeping services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior was provided for 7 residents (#24, #63, #11, #74, #31, #41, and #76). The census was 124. The deficient practice could result in resident rooms not having a homelike environment.
Findings include:
An observation was conducted on January 3, 2022 at 9:45 AM. The hallway and room of resident #24 and resident #63 were noted to have a foul odor. Under the window to the exterior wall of the residents' room and closest to resident #24's bed, wall paper was observed peeling from the base of the window downward to the floor in 2 areas. Behind the wallpaper that was peeling was an open hole in the wall. The hole was observed to be approximately 8 to 10 inches in width and 4 to 6 inches in height. The closet space provided for resident #24 had closet fixture pieces that were wire-like that were on the floor inside that closet, and broken plastic brackets inside of the closet. On the floor near the closet for resident #24 was a thick black substance on and around the baseboard. The corner of the closet was observed to have peeling plaster and wallpaper. At the base of the floor on the base trim was a small hole approximately 1 inch by 1 inch. Wall paper was observed peeling to the right and just under the sink in the room. The wallpaper to the right of the sink was observed to have red dry droplets noted in multiple areas in circular droplet shapes. Also observed were 2 holes in the ceiling and drywall pieces hanging down. The holes were approximately 1 inch and circular shaped over resident #63's bed. Observation of the closet space for resident #62 revealed metal trim exposed to the wall edge near the closet, and the baseboard trim was missing. Wallpaper peeling from the wall and plaster debris was observed on the floor. Resident #63 was observed with no pictures on the wall or in the resident's area and had one bedside table and a bed. The floor space of resident #63 was noted to have 3 dry brown smudges on the floor near the bed.
On January 3, 2022 at 12:50 PM, the room for resident #11 was observed. An area approximately 3-4 feet wide from the ceiling to the top of the resident's bed was observed to have wallpaper that had been peeled off. To the left of the bed was a white fiberglass reinforced plastic panel covering the wall that had a hole next to bed at the base of the paneling. The wall was to the left of the resident's bed.
An observation was conducted of resident #74's room on January 3, 2022 at 12:52 PM. The electrical outlet next to resident #74's bed was missing the electrical outlet cover plate. The metal outlet cover was sitting on the air conditioning unit to the left of the bed. The outlet was left exposed.
Continued observation revealed resident #31's room was also observed with an outlet with no cover plate, the outlet was left exposed. The cover plate was near the air conditioning unit.
The Regional Maintenance Director (staff #135) was notified immediately of the safety concern. He stated that this occurrence should be documented in the facilities TELS system for reporting and tracking maintenance repairs. Further, staff #135 stated that he would review the TELS system for work orders for the identified building repair concerns.
During an observation conducted on January 4, 2022 at 9:22 AM, the hallway of rooms 137-148 was noted to have a noticeable smell of urine in the hallway.
During an observation conducted on January 5, 2022 at 12:33 PM, the interior wall near the exit to the corridor in residents' #41 and #76 room had a brown crusted area to the wall near the light switch. The brown smudged area was observed to be circular and in multiple areas spreading approximately 8 to 10 inches.
On January 6, 2022 at 8:46 AM, a door labeled electrical room was observed on the hallway. The outside of the door (in the hallway) was observed to have rust colored brown substance that ran down the door in three areas. The substance was dry and crusted and appeared to have ran approximately 6 inches from top to bottom.
A second observation of resident #41 and #76 room was conducted on January 6, 2022 at 8:49 AM. The brown dry smudged substance near the light switch on the wall closest to the corridor was observed to still be there.
An interview and observation were conducted on January 6, 2022 at 9:11 AM with the Administrator (staff #136) and the Maintenance Assistant (staff #117). The Maintenance Assistant stated that the facility was alerted to the hole in the wall in resident #24 and resident #63 room. Staff #177 stated that the facility staff replaced the drywall and there was no longer a hole in the exterior wall. Additionally, he stated that the maintenance team went around all of the rooms yesterday (January 5, 2021) and checked all of the light switch plates that were missing or broken and replaced them. Further, he stated that the ply wood under the sink in resident #24 and #63 room was placed there because a resident was pulling the plumbing from under the sink and that there were holes in the ceiling because another resident was pulling the curtains from the ceiling. Staff #117 stated that if the building needs repair he expects the staff on the floor to report it so it can be put into the TELS system for documentation. Additionally, he explained that he knows that is not the current practice. Further, he explained that the staff needs education so they can learn to report the building issues, so that repairs can be addressed.
An additional interview was conducted on January 6, 2022 at 9:25 AM with the Maintenance Assistant (staff #117). The Maintenance Assistant stated that he and the Director of Maintenance are new to the facility and that they do not have records or further evidence to provide from the TELS system. Staff #117 stated that instead of utilizing the TELS system of a building repair that need to be completed, the maintenance staff would just go and fix it. Further, staff #117 stated that staff need more education regarding notifying the maintenance team of building repairs that are needed. He stated there are more floor staff to identify concerns than there are of the maintenance team. Staff #117 stated maintenance cannot go room to room every day to identify concerns.
An interview was conducted with the Administrator (staff #136) on January 6, 2022 at 10:13 AM. Staff #136 stated that he was unaware of any family or visitor that has filed formal grievances related to the building repair needs. He stated that he expects staff to report any building repair concerns to the maintenance team. Further he stated that the facility utilizes TELS to track building repairs. He stated timeliness of getting repairs fixed is monitored by the leadership team. Further, he stated the TELS system is important to utilize because it helps the facility to be organized and helps staff keep track of things that need to be repaired. The Administrator stated that he was unaware if the TELS system had evidence that work orders were put in the system for the identified items brought to his attention on January 6, 2022 at 9:11 AM. In regards to the residents' room and environment, the Administrator stated that due to the COVID-19 pandemic the facility staff has had difficulty with resident behaviors and room items have had to be removed. Further, staff #136 stated that if there are any areas of concern regarding cleanliness such as brown smeared substance or liquids dried to the walls, he expects the staff to clean it off of the walls using the appropriate disinfectants.
On January 6, 2022 at 12:54 PM, an interview was conducted with the Regional Maintenance Director (staff #135). He stated that the facility TELS system does not have any work tickets for any wallpaper or structural holes building concerns. He stated that he has reviewed the TELS system work orders and that the facility has only been entering work tickets for broken beds, televisions that were not working, and call lights. Further, he stated that he recognized that there was a need for housekeepers that are in the rooms every day to be provided education to report building concerns because there are increased risks for missing needed building repairs.
Review of the facility policy regarding maintenance requests and work orders revised November 2016 stated it is the policy of this facility to maintain a clean, well repaired building, and provide staff to report any issues needing attention. All work request must be in form of work orders, not verbal (unless emergency situations). The facility uses electronic work orders through TELS. TELS can be accessed through manager's computers, Kiosk, PCC (point click care), and at the nurses' station. Give complete information on all work orders, include what, where, and who is reporting.
The facility's infection control policy titled Housekeeping Services revised May 2021 stated it is the policy of this facility to require effective environmental sanitation to lessen the hazards of exposure to contaminated air, dust, furnishings, equipment and other fomites. Frequent cleaning of the facility's interior will aid in physically removing and reducing microorganisms' potential contribution to the incidence of health-associated infections (HAI). The housekeeping supervisor will implement effective systems of environmental sanitation, including a regular cleaning schedule for all areas. The housekeeping supervisor will work closely with the infection control team to establish and maintain consistent practices and high standards of cleanliness. In-service training programs will be held for new personnel as well as older employees for the purpose of introducing them to new techniques and skills. Periodic inspection of the facility will be made by the housekeeping supervisor or as a joint exercise with the infection control team. Thorough scrubbing will be used for all environmental surfaces that are being cleaned in resident care areas. In resident care areas, cleaning of non-carpeted floors and other horizontal surfaces will be done daily and more frequently if spillage or visible soiling occurs. Doorknobs, handrails, bath rails, sink handles, etc. will all be cleaned at least once daily and more often as needed. Cleaning of walls, curtains, blinds, etc. will be completed when dust/soil is visible.
The facility policy titled Physical Environment Equipment Maintenance reviewed May 2021 stated it is the policy of this facility to establish procedures for routine and non-routine care of equipment and to ensure that equipment remains in good working order for resident and staff safety. Electrical and hydraulic equipment will be inspected by the Maintenance Supervisor prior to initial use and on a routine basis to ensure that equipment is working properly. The Maintenance Supervisor will carry out routine maintenance on specified program equipment, as per manufacturer's recommendations and/or program policy. In the event that equipment maintenance or servicing is required between scheduled checks, maintenance requests will be made through TELS. All staff filling out the TELS request will include date, nature of problem. TELS maintenance requests will be checked by Maintenance Supervisor or Designee at least daily. If equipment requires repair other than routine maintenance or servicing, the vendor through which the equipment was purchased will be contacted and arrangements made for repair/replacement.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** -Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Paraplegia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Dise...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** -Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Paraplegia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Neuromuscular Dysfunction of the Bladder.
Review of the progress notes revealed a Change in Condition note dated November 16, 2021 at 10:42 PM that resident #37 had symptoms or signs noted of abdominal pain.
A note dated November 17, 2021 at 5:07 PM revealed the resident was sent to the emergency room (ER) for a non-emergency abdominal Computed tomography scan (CT), to rule out an acute abdominal perforate of the bowel. The family was notified via telephone. The Medical Doctor (MD) was present.
A verbal physician order in the resident's electronic record dated October 17, 2021 stated to transport to the emergency room for non-emergency abdominal CT, to rule out acute abdomen and perforator bowel.
Further review of the resident's clinical record revealed a notice of transfer form dated November 17, 2021 that the transfer/discharge was necessary for the resident's welfare and that the resident's needs cannot be met in the facility due to abdominal pain. The form was signed by the resident representative and dated November 18, 2021.
Review of the admission/discharge logs revealed that the Ombudsman was not notified of discharges/transfers in September 2021, October 2021, and November 2021.
Facility documentation included a letter from the Social Services Manager (staff #29) stating that she did not know that it was her responsibility to send the discharge list to the Ombudsman each month.
An interview was conducted on January 6, 2022 at 2:48 p.m. with the Social Services Manager (staff #29), who stated the Ombudsman wants to be notified at the end of each month regarding discharges, but she just found about it and needs to find out who was sending the notices before her. During the interview, she contacted the Medical Records Supervisor (staff #44) and was told that she was responsible for notifying the Ombudsman regarding transfers and discharges. Staff #29 stated that she has never notified the Ombudsman and would imagine that it has not been done since she started working at the facility in September 2021.
During an interview conducted on January 7, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. with the Administrator (staff #136) and the Director of Nursing (DON/staff #133), staff #133 stated the Ombudsman is notified of transfers/discharges via fax/email/calls and it is the responsibility of the Social Services Manager to notify the Ombudsman regarding transfers. Staff #136 stated the Ombudsman was not notified about resident #76 and #37 being transferred to the hospital and he had no evidence that the Ombudsman was notified regarding transfers/discharges for the months of September, October, and November 2021. Further the Administrator stated that there should be at least monthly notification to the Ombudsman. Staff #136 stated however, the management team have identified there is likely a deficient practice for a duration of time related to the notification to Ombudsman, and at this point there is missing Ombudsman notification for these two residents.
The facility's policy, Admission, Transfer, and discharged , revised November 2019 stated the facility will notify the Ombudsman per CMS regulations and guidelines.
Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the written notice of transfer/discharge for two of two residents (#76 and #37) was sent to the Office of the State Long Term Ombudsman. The deficient practice could result in the ombudsman not being notified of resident transfers/discharges.
Findings include:
-Resident #76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis, major depression, and anxiety.
A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated August 31, 2021 indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a score of 11.
Review of the progress notes revealed the following:
-On October 16, 2021 at 10:17 p.m. change of condition: symptoms or signs of condition change: altered mental state.
-On October 16, 2021 at 10:37 p.m. resident refused medications and was noted to have altered mental state. Slurring words or not answering. Leaning over in wheelchair. Nurse Practitioner called and orders received to send to emergency room for evaluation and treatment. 911 called at approximately 9:30 p.m., arrived at 9:40 p.m. and left with resident at approximately 10:00 p.m. All parties notified.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** -Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance, senile d...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** -Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance, senile degeneration of brain, and major depressive disorder.
Review of the physician order dated October 18, 2021 revealed the resident was with hospice, diagnosis senile degeneration of the brain.
A review of the Care Plan initiated on October 18, 2021 revealed the resident had a terminal prognosis and was admitted to hospice. The goal was that the resident's comfort would be maintained. Interventions included coordinating care with hospice to provide activities of daily living care to the resident, and comfort and support to the resident and family.
However, review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] did not reflect the resident was receiving hospice services while a resident in the facility.
An interview was conducted on January 7, 2021 at 12:23 PM with the MDS nurse (staff#7), the Director of Nursing (DON/staff #133) and Clinical Resource (staff #129). The MDS nurse stated that if a resident resides in the facility and has received hospice services in the last 14 days, section O of the MDS assessment should be marked Yes for hospice. The MDS nurse reviewed the resident's record and stated the resident started receiving hospice services on October 14, 2021 and that the quarterly MDS assessment did not included the resident was receiving hospice care which would indicate there was a discrepancy in the assessment. Staff #129 stated that there was an oversight from an MDS resource nurse that reviews and audits MDS assessments for accuracy and completion.
Review of the facility's accuracy of MDS assessment policy, dated 5/2021, revealed that the policy of the facility is to ensure the assessment accurately reflect the resident's status. The procedure included that each resident receives an accurate assessment by staff that are qualified to assess relevant care areas and are knowledgeable about the resident's status needs, strengths, and areas of decline. The procedure included that a Registered Nurse (RN) must conduct or coordinate each assessment with the appropriate participation of health professionals. The policy included that the mental condition of the resident determines the appropriate level of involvement of physicians, nurses, therapists, activities professionals, social workers, dietitians, and other professionals. The policy included that on an assessment, the MDS coordinator is responsible for certifying the overall completion once all individual assessors have completed and signed their portions of the MDS.
Review of the RAI manual revealed that the MDS assessment must accurately reflect the resident's status. The manual included that if the resident received hospice care while a resident in the facility and within the last 14 days, check hospice care while a resident.
Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, review of facility policy, and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed accurately for 8 residents (#27, #64, #75, #33, #52, #66, #63, and #37), by failing to conduct the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and for one resident (#75) regarding hospice. The sample size was 25 residents. The deficient practice could result in not identifying necessary care needs and treatment.
Findings include:
-Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia without behavioral disturbance and major depressive disorder.
Review of the resident's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the assessment was coded that the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) should be attempted with the resident, however, this section was not completed. The staff interview for mental status was also not completed.
-Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, and insomnia.
Review of the resident's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the assessment was coded that the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) should be attempted with the resident, however, this section was not completed. The staff interview for mental status was also not completed.
-Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance, senile degeneration of brain, and major depressive disorder.
Review of the resident's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the assessment was coded that the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) should be attempted with the resident, however, this section was not completed. The staff interview for mental status was also not completed.
-Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease and dementia without behavioral disturbance.
Review of the resident's significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the assessment was coded that the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) should be attempted with the resident, however, this section was not completed. The staff interview for mental status was also not completed.
-Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, schizoaffective disorder, and anxiety disorder.
Review of the resident's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the assessment was coded that the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) should be attempted with the resident, however, this section was not completed. The staff interview for mental status was also not completed.
-Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and major depressive disorder.
Review of the resident's significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the assessment was coded that the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) should be attempted with the resident, however, this section was not completed. The staff interview for mental status was also not completed.
-Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Huntington's disease, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and other specified mental disorders due to known physiological condition.
Review of the resident's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the assessment was coded that the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) should be attempted with the resident, however, this section was not completed. The staff interview for mental status was also not completed.
-Resident #37 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paraplegia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder.
Review of the resident's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the assessment was coded that the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) should be attempted with the resident, however, this section was not completed. The staff interview for mental status was also not completed.
An interview was conducted with the MDS coordinator (staff #7) at 10:45 a.m. on 1/6/2022. She stated that she completes the MDS assessments as per the required MDS schedule including on admission, quarterly, annually, and also when residents have significant changes. She said that social services complete the cognition section of the MDS that includes the BIMS for the residents and she is not involved in this. She said that once this section and the rest of the MDS are complete, she will go into the assessment, ensure it is done and submit it. She said that regarding the BIMS and cognition part of the assessments, she has noticed that they are not always done and unfortunately, by the time she notices this, it is too late to complete it for the resident so she has to mark it as not assessed and move on. She said that she believed the issue was a change in social services with staffing, as about 4 months ago they went without a dedicated social worker for a while. She said that since a new one was hired, there were still a few issues because the new social worker did not quite understand the system, but this has improved. She said that the cognition section including the BIMS assessment should be completed for each resident. She said that even though she noticed the issue with the MDS assessments, she does not believe that it was ever addressed in Quality Assurance (QA).
During an interview conducted with the social services manager (staff #29) at 10:58 a.m. on 1/6/2022, she said that she has only been in the facility for a few months and that things were kind of a mess. She said that she is responsible for completing the BIMS and cognition part of the MDS assessment. She further said that for a while she was not completing everything correctly per the facility's system and that she has since learned the right way to do it.
An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON/staff #133) at 11:29 a.m. on 1/6/22. She said that she does not have any role in the completion of the residents' MDS assessments in the building. She said she has an MDS coordinator who takes on that role. She said that it is her expectation that the assessments are done timely and accurately. She said she was not aware that some of the assessments were not being completed accurately. She said that normally, her MDS coordinator will bring any noted issues to her attention. She said she was not aware of any action items regarding this in QA and this was the first she had heard of the issue.
Review of the RAI manual revealed that the MDS assessment must accurately reflect the resident's status. The manual included that the section for cognition is intended to determine the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information. These items are crucial factors in many care planning decisions. Further, the manual indicated that most residents are able to attempt the BIMS and the interview assists in identifying needed support.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record reviews, resident and staff interviews, and facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to en...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record reviews, resident and staff interviews, and facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring and supervision was provided for six residents (#s 107, 76, 41, 32, 83, and 82). The deficient practice could result in other residents being denied the right to privacy and personal space.
Findings include:
Resident #107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, anxiety, and major depressive disorder.
Review of the care plan for elopement risk/wanderer dated February 25, 2021 revealed the resident wanders on the unit. Interventions included to distract the resident from wandering by offering pleasant diversions, structured activities, food, conversation, television, book, provide structured activities: toileting, walking inside and outside, reorientation strategies including signs, pictures and memory boxes, and re-direct resident when he wanders.
Review of progress notes revealed that resident #107 wandered into other residents' rooms continuously, such as:
on March 14, 2021 continue intrusive wandering at all times and took off clothing often difficult to redirection, becomes physically aggressive up onto redressing for him.
-on March 20, 2021 one episode of noted persistent intrusive wandering and physically aggressive. Resident is wandering into each room and takes things from peer all time difficult to redirection. Resisted with personal care and attempted to hit CNA. Need one to one at times.
-on March 21, 2021 one episode noted of persistent intrusive wandering and increased in afternoon. Resident wandering into each room and takes things from peer all times as upset peer, difficult to redirect.
-on May 11, 2021 episodes of wandering in and out of residents' rooms, urinating on the hallways, attempts to be physical when redirected.
-on October 23, 2021 states resident observed with intrusive wandering and exit seeking. Keeps taking off his clothes, hard with redirection.
-on December 13, 2021 states intrusive wandering, won't stay in bed. continually wandering into other residents' rooms. Difficult to redirect.
The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included a staff assessment for mental status indicating the resident was moderately impaired of cognitive skills for daily decision making. It also included that the resident wandered for 1 to 3 days during the look-back period.
Continued review of progress notes revealed the following:
-on December 19, 2021 states episodes of persisted intrusive wandering into peers' room and caused them agitation and damaged things.
-on December 27, 2021 revealed that the resident continuously wondering unit, intrusive to peers, staff continuously redirecting resident throughout the night while resident is awake.
-on January 1, 2022 states continue intrusive wandering as bothered peers all times, difficult to redirection.
Review of behavioral progress notes revealed continuous wandering and removing clothing and wandering into other residents' rooms:
-on May 10, 2021 resident wandering and stripping clothes.
-on May 10, 2021 resident wandering all day rummaging through patients' rooms.
-on May 25, 2021 wanders around and stripping off clothes.
Review of a follow-up psych evaluation dated December, 15, 2021 stated the resident was being seen for psychiatric follow up. Staff notes that patient is frequently impulsive and intrusively wanders continuously.
Review of the Nursing Home to Hospital Transfer Form dated January 1, 2022 revealed the resident was being transferred for behavioral symptoms (e.g. agitation, psychosis). Not accepting back due to behavioral issues affecting peers.
Regarding residents #107, #76, #41, and #32
-Resident #76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis, major depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and anxiety.
A care plan dated August 27, 2021 stated the resident was at risk for Re-traumatization related to history of trauma Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Resident makes up stories about other residents, will have delusional thinking about other residents in the facility. The goal was that the resident would have no evidence of emotional, physical and psychological problems. Interventions included anticipate and meet needs.
Review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated January 3, 2022 revealed a score of 9 indicating the resident had moderately impaired cognition
During an interview conducted with resident #76 on January 3, 2022 at 9:00 a.m., she reported that she was asleep in her wheelchair and when she woke up, resident #107 was in her room. Resident #76 stated resident #107 had his penis out and was trying to put it in her roommate's mouth. Resident #76 stated that she screamed and her roommate (resident #41) woke up. Resident #76 stated that she did not remember the date of the incident, but stated that she did remember it was dark outside. Resident #76 said she wanted to call the Sheriff's department but was told by a female staff not to report it because it would cause trouble for the facility. Resident #76 also stated that another female resident (#32) has some stories about resident #107.
-Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included alcohol use, unspecified with alcohol-induced persisting amnestic disorder, dementia, and adult failure to thrive.
A BIMS dated January 3, 2022 indicated the resident has a moderate cognitive impairment with a score of 8.
Resident #41 was interviewed after the interview with resident #76 on January 3, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. Resident #41 said that she did not remember waking up and finding resident #107 trying to put his penis in her mouth, but he does come into her room all the time.
-Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder, delusional disorders, and cognitive communication deficit.
The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] included a BIMS score of 13 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The assessment also included that the resident did not hallucinate or have delusions during the look-back period.
During an interview conducted with resident #32 on January 3, 2022 at 10:14 a.m., resident #32 stated that there are two guys that come into her room. She said one wears a red shirt, and one has hearing aids. She stated that she thinks they were both in the military. She said that one of the men came into her room the day before yesterday and tried to put his penis by her mouth. Resident #32 said that she reported it and staff told her that they do not mean what they are doing. She stated that she is afraid of them, emotional, challenged to not go crazy.
Regarding residents #107, #83, and #82
-Resident #83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder, dementia, and chronic kidney disease.
The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] included a BIMS with a score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact.
An interview was conducted on January 5, 2022 at 11:27 a.m. with resident #83, who stated that resident #107 and #82 are always coming into her room and going through her things. She said that she has reported this to staff, but they don't care. During the interview, a male resident, identified as resident #82, came to the door of the room in a wheelchair. Resident #82 started to roll in and resident #83 told him to go away. Resident #82 sat at the door and resident #83 repeated in a stronger/louder voice, get out. Resident #82 then backed up and left. Resident #83 stated that she yells up to 20 to 30 minutes before a staff will come to her room and redirect them.
-Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, anxiety, and major depressive disorder.
Review of the BIMS dated February 27, 2021 revealed a score of 5 indicating resident #82 has a severe cognitive impairment.
The resident has a care plan for actual behavior problems related to unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance dated February 20, 2021. Target behaviors included exit seeking/elopement risk, sexually inappropriate, and verbal/physical aggression. Interventions included to intervene as necessary to protect the rights and safety of others and staff should be aware that the resident will attempt sexually inappropriate behaviors towards (peers and staff). Staff should provide care in pairs.
Review of progress notes revealed multiple incidents where the resident entered other residents' rooms, such as:
-On November 22, 2020 resident noted to be exhibiting intrusive behaviors this shift, wandering into other's rooms.
-On September 26, 2021 resident continues to exit seek and continues with intrusive wandering goes through others belongings and hits staff at times.
-On December 14, 2021 resident with noted behaviors of intrusive wandering times 3.
An interview was conducted on January 5, 2022 at 10:07 a.m. with an activity's assistant (staff #73), who stated that resident #107 does wander in other residents' rooms and does touch their things, but she has not seen him take things.
An interview was conducted on January 5, 2022 at 10:21 a.m. with a certified nursing assistant (CNA/staff #116). She stated that some of the male residents may wander into other residents' rooms and when this happens, she will redirect them immediately. She said there was an incident last week where resident #32 was in her room and she heard her screaming. Staff #116 stated that she went to the resident's room and the resident told her that the male resident (#107) was disrobing and exposing himself. Staff #116 stated that resident #107 was in the room, but he had his clothes on. She said resident #107 removes his clothing in the hallway, but she has not seen him do it in a resident's room, and he is not being sexual. The CNA stated that she thinks resident #107 does it because he is wet and uncomfortable, so he pulls his brief off. Staff #116 said that resident #32 screams when someone enters her room and she thinks it is because resident #32 gets confused about what is happening. The CNA stated that she will redirect the resident out of resident #32's room because the resident should not be in there. Staff #116 stated that she feels they are short staffed and it is difficult to monitor all the residents on the hall.
During an interview conducted on January 5, 2022 at 10:51 a.m. with a licensed practical nurse (LPN/staff #28), she stated that some of the residents will disrobe because of behavior. The LPN said resident #107 is an intrusive wanderer and does disrobe, but it is usually because he is wet.
An interview was conducted on January 5, 2022 at 1:02 p.m. with a CNA (staff #134), who stated that there are not enough staff to monitor the residents that wander into other residents' rooms. Staff #134 stated that they do the best they can and just try to redirect them. She said the female residents will usually press their call-light when another resident enters their room and staff will go to check why the call-light is on.
On January 6, 2022 at 10:24 a.m., an interview was conducted with a CNA (staff #4), who stated that there are three CNAs on the South Hall and one is assigned to each hall to provide care and monitor residents. She stated that residents #82 and #107 and another resident wanders into other residents' rooms. She stated that she knows that resident #76 has complained of resident #107 coming into her room. Staff #4 stated that she was told by another staff, but she cannot remember which staff, that resident #32 reported resident #107 was in her room and attempting to show his penis. She stated that the CNAs do their best, but cannot monitor the residents who wander when they are in a resident's room providing care. The CNA stated that when she does see a resident go into another room, she will redirect and shut the resident's door, but knows that it is happening. She stated that resident #107 does remove his clothing. She said there are not enough staff to monitor the residents wandering and to provide care. She said that the CNA is supposed to remain in the hallway to monitor the residents, but cannot do that if in a room providing care for another resident.
On January 7, 2022 at 10:16 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON/staff #133). She stated residents that wander into other residents' rooms should be redirected by any staff. The DON stated there should be constant redirecting and staff should be keeping the residents busy. The DON said she did not know resident #107, #82, and another resident were going into the female residents' rooms, prior to this week.
The facility's policy, Nursing Services, Sufficient Staff , revised May 2021 stated it is the policy of this facility to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to promote resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable mental, psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessment and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnosis of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment.
The facility policy, Resident Rights. Reporting Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime, revised November 28, 2018 stated the facility will take action to protect and prevent abuse and neglect from occurring within the Facility by identifying, assessing, care planning for appropriate interventions, and monitoring of residents with needs and behaviors which might lead to conflict or neglect, such as:
-Taking, touching, or rummaging through other's property;
-Wandering into other's rooms/space.