ALMA NURSING AND REHAB
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Alma Nursing and Rehab has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice among nursing homes. With a state ranking of #48 out of 218 facilities, they are in the top half of options in Arkansas, and as the top-ranked facility in Crawford County, families have only one other local option that is better. The facility is showing an improving trend, having reduced issues from six in 2023 to just two in 2024. Staffing is average, with a 3 out of 5 rating and a turnover rate of 55%, which is close to the state average of 50%. While the facility has not incurred any fines, which is a positive sign, there have been concerns about food safety practices, including not maintaining proper food temperatures and failing to ensure residents received the correct portions, which raises potential health risks. Overall, Alma Nursing and Rehab has strengths in its ranking and no fines, but families should be aware of the food safety concerns that have been identified.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Arkansas
- #48/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 55% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 21 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ○ Average
- 10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Arkansas avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
7 points above Arkansas average of 48%
The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record
Aug 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment to prevent potential food borne illness for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to pull the privacy curtain when providing care for one (Resident #17) of 20 (Residents #8, #11, #17, #19, #22, #25, #28, #29, #...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) screening was readily available in the electronic record for 1 (Resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nail care and facial grooming was regularly provided or offered to maintain good hygiene for 1 (Resident #11) of 20 (R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a Physician's Order before administering supplemental oxygen to 1 (Resident #56) of 3 (Residents #19, #34 and #43) sam...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and an interview, the facility failed to ensure fortified food was prepared and served according to the planned written Quantified recipe and or menu to meet the n...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure cold food items were maintained at or above 41 degrees Fahrenheit while awaiting to be served to prevent potential food borne illness...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure fingernails were clean, groomed, and free from jagged edges to promote good personal hygiene and grooming for 1 (Reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for residents w...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- • 55% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Alma Nursing And Rehab's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns ALMA NURSING AND REHAB an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Alma Nursing And Rehab Staffed?
CMS rates ALMA NURSING AND REHAB's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 55%, which is 9 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Alma Nursing And Rehab?
State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at ALMA NURSING AND REHAB during 2022 to 2024. These included: 10 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Alma Nursing And Rehab?
ALMA NURSING AND REHAB is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 74 certified beds and approximately 68 residents (about 92% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in ALMA, Arkansas.
How Does Alma Nursing And Rehab Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, ALMA NURSING AND REHAB's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (55%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Alma Nursing And Rehab?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Alma Nursing And Rehab Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, ALMA NURSING AND REHAB has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Alma Nursing And Rehab Stick Around?
Staff turnover at ALMA NURSING AND REHAB is high. At 55%, the facility is 9 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Alma Nursing And Rehab Ever Fined?
ALMA NURSING AND REHAB has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Alma Nursing And Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?
ALMA NURSING AND REHAB is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.