TWIN RIVERS REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Twin Rivers Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center has received a Trust Grade of C, which means it is average-middle of the pack, neither great nor terrible. It ranks #93 out of 218 facilities in Arkansas, placing it in the top half, but is the only nursing home option in Clark County, ranking #2 of 2. The facility is improving, as the number of issues reported decreased from three in 2024 to one in 2025. Staffing ratings are good, with a 4/5 star rating, but the turnover rate is 58%, which is higher than the state average. However, the facility has concerning fines of $12,335, which are higher than 83% of Arkansas facilities. On the positive side, Twin Rivers has more registered nurse coverage than 92% of facilities in the state, helping to catch issues early. However, there are notable weaknesses; for instance, one resident suffered a serious injury due to improper transferring practices, resulting in a fractured bone. Additionally, there were concerns about food safety practices, such as foods not being stored properly in the freezer and unsanitized kitchen equipment, which could lead to foodborne illnesses. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and RN coverage, families should be aware of the facility's history of incidents and fines.
- Trust Score
- C
- In Arkansas
- #93/218
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $12,335 in fines. Lower than most Arkansas facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 39 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Arkansas. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 21 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
12pts above Arkansas avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
10 points above Arkansas average of 48%
The Ugly 21 deficiencies on record
Aug 2025
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free of harm due to improper transferring of residents ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications from an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 (Resident #67)...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication was used only to treat specific diagnosed condition for 1 (Resident #71) sampled r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to keep food at a safe temperature prior to serving residents.
The findings are:
On 8/28/2024 at 7:31 AM, [NAME] #1 checked t...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
9 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to address the use of opioid medication for 1 (Resident #42) of 29 (Residents #3, #5, #7, #9...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to self-administer medi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Janitor's Closet containing chemicals was locked when not in use to prevent the potential for accidents. This failed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary supplements were provided as ordered for (Resident #76) of 1 Resident reviewed for dietary supplements. The fin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated scheduled II-V controlled medications were maintained within a separately locked permanently affixed compa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a method that maintained the appearance of cold and or hot products and at temperatures that were ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0805
(Tag F0805)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump-free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in in the freezer were covered and sealed to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents w...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2022
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the privacy curtain was completed pulled around the bed and door to the resident ' s room was closed to provide privac...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided for 2 (Residents #36 and #48) and baths were given for (Resident #36) for 20 (Residents #36, 48...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility to ensure a bottle of normal saline was securely stored for 1of 1 (Resident #165) sampled resident who required the use of normal saline...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was consistently administered at the flow rate ordered by the physician, to minimize respiratory complications ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation of the 9:00 a.m. medication passes on 07/13/22, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure orders were followed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed to prevent a significant medication error for 1 of 1 (Resident #50) sampled resident wh...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0800
(Tag F0800)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure supplements per the dietary tray card and assistance and encouragement with eating snacks were provided for 1 (Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure food stored in the refrigerator and freezer was tightly sealed, dishes were properly sanitized by immersion in either hot water (at lea...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • 21 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $12,335 in fines. Above average for Arkansas. Some compliance problems on record.
- • Grade C (58/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
- • 58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Twin Rivers Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns TWIN RIVERS REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Twin Rivers Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center Staffed?
CMS rates TWIN RIVERS REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 58%, which is 12 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Twin Rivers Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center?
State health inspectors documented 21 deficiencies at TWIN RIVERS REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 20 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Twin Rivers Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center?
TWIN RIVERS REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SOUTHERN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 72 certified beds and approximately 67 residents (about 93% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in ARKADELPHIA, Arkansas.
How Does Twin Rivers Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, TWIN RIVERS REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (58%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Twin Rivers Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Twin Rivers Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, TWIN RIVERS REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Twin Rivers Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center Stick Around?
Staff turnover at TWIN RIVERS REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER is high. At 58%, the facility is 12 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Twin Rivers Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center Ever Fined?
TWIN RIVERS REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER has been fined $12,335 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Arkansas average of $33,202. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Twin Rivers Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center on Any Federal Watch List?
TWIN RIVERS REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.