OAK MANOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Oak Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in Booneville, Arkansas has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice for families seeking care. It ranks #71 out of 218 in the state, placing it in the top half, and is the best option among the two facilities in Logan County. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 13 in 2023 to just 2 in 2024, which is a positive trend. Staffing is rated 4 out of 5 stars with a turnover rate of 36%, well below the state average, suggesting that staff are experienced and familiar with the residents. However, there have been concerns, such as expired medications found on-site and issues with food safety in the kitchen, which highlight areas that need attention despite the overall good reputation of the facility.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Arkansas
- #71/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 36% turnover. Near Arkansas's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 26 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 17 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (36%)
12 points below Arkansas average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
10pts below Arkansas avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 17 deficiencies on record
Sept 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, interviews, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to discard 3 expired medications from 1 of 2 medication carts observed for medication label...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a safe manner in order to prevent foodborne illness by not cleaning the deep fryer and grease tra...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
13 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident preferences listed on tray cards were followed for 1 (Resident #47) of 1 sampled resident. The findings are:
...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended at the bed...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer pneumococcal vaccines in a timely manner after receiving a signed consent for 1 (Resident #33) of 5 (Residents #11, #14, #19, #3...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
3. Resident #53:
a. On 08/07/23 at 12:54 PM, the Surveyor observed Resident #53 attempting to feed himself with a teaspoon; a portion of the food fell off the spoon each time he lifted it to his mouth...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure fingernails were trimmed, smooth, clean, and free of jagged edges to promote good personal hygiene and grooming for 1 (...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Physician Orders were followed for 1 (Resident #47) of 4 (Residents #19, #26, #47 and #50) sampled residents with orde...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
2. Resident #32:
a. On 08/07/23 at 11:49 AM Resident #32 was lying in bed with oxygen being administered by nasal cannula. A CPAP machine was at the bedside, the CPAP tubing was in a bag dated 4/1. A ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared by methods that maintained flavor and appearance to the residents to improve palatability and encoura...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0805
(Tag F0805)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a multi-resident use glucometer was disinfected after each use to prevent potential spread of infection for 2 of 2 obs...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's personal fans was properly cleaned to prevent the potential for infection for 1 (Resident #11) of 3 (Resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food stored in the walk-in refrigerator, the refrigerator/freezer in the Medication Room on the South Hall, the Nourishment Room on th...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the refrigerator and/or freezer were labeled, dated, covered and/or sealed; foods were stored date...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0925
(Tag F0925)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the maintenance of an effective pest control program to maintain a facility free of insects/pests The findings are:
1....
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- • 36% turnover. Below Arkansas's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 17 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Oak Manor Inc's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns OAK MANOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Oak Manor Inc Staffed?
CMS rates OAK MANOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 36%, compared to the Arkansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Oak Manor Inc?
State health inspectors documented 17 deficiencies at OAK MANOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC during 2022 to 2024. These included: 17 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Oak Manor Inc?
OAK MANOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 120 certified beds and approximately 51 residents (about 42% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in BOONEVILLE, Arkansas.
How Does Oak Manor Inc Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, OAK MANOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (36%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Oak Manor Inc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Oak Manor Inc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, OAK MANOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Oak Manor Inc Stick Around?
OAK MANOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC has a staff turnover rate of 36%, which is about average for Arkansas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Oak Manor Inc Ever Fined?
OAK MANOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Oak Manor Inc on Any Federal Watch List?
OAK MANOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.