JOHNSON COUNTY HEALTH AND REHAB, LLC

1451 EAST POPLAR STREET, CLARKSVILLE, AR 72830 (479) 754-2052
For profit - Limited Liability company 107 Beds CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
66/100
#66 of 218 in AR
Last Inspection: April 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Johnson County Health and Rehab, LLC in Clarksville, Arkansas has a Trust Grade of C+, which means it is slightly above average but still has room for improvement. It ranks #66 out of 218 facilities in Arkansas, placing it in the top half, and is the only nursing home in Johnson County. The facility shows an improving trend, having reduced issues from 3 in 2024 to just 1 in 2025. However, staffing is a concern, with less registered nurse coverage than 81% of state facilities, although the overall staffing rating of 4 out of 5 stars indicates good support. On the downside, there have been some serious incidents, such as a resident with dementia eloping from the facility and an alarm being turned off without notifying staff, which posed a significant safety risk. Additionally, there were failures in hand hygiene practices in the kitchen, which could lead to foodborne illnesses, and concerns about how dignified feeding assistance is provided to residents in the secure unit. Despite these weaknesses, the facility's overall quality measures are strong, reflecting a commitment to resident care.

Trust Score
C+
66/100
In Arkansas
#66/218
Top 30%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
3 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
40% turnover. Near Arkansas's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
$8,281 in fines. Lower than most Arkansas facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 18 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 5 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★☆☆
3.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 3 issues
2025: 1 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (40%)

    8 points below Arkansas average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 40%

Near Arkansas avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $8,281

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 5 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening
Mar 2025 1 deficiency 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from elopement for 1 (Res...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from elopement for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for elopement risks. Specifically, Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia and psychotic disorder and was severely cognitively impaired. When the resident exited the facility an alarm sounded, and within one minute, an office aide turned the alarm off. The office aide did not notify any other staff that the alarm had sounded and continued working. On 02/28/2025 at 08:06AM, staff confirmed Resident #1 eloped by video, called a Code Green, and notified the Administrator. At 08:26AM the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Supervisor located Resident #1 at a park, 1.25 miles away, and returned Resident #1 to the facility. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, 483.25 at a scope and severity of J. The IJ began on 02/28/2025 at 07:38AM, when Resident #1 eloped from the facility, and an office aide turned the alarm off and did not notify any other staff that the alarm had sounded. The Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance (PNC) IJ on 03/12/2025 at 1:46 PM. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's completion of its survey, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings include: Review of a policy titled, Elopement and Wandering, revised 11/12/2017, revealed all employees are trained about elopement on hire and annually, and all employees were responsible for immediately reporting any suspicion or attempt of resident elopement to the charge nurse or Director of Nursing (DON). Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, delirium, and brief psychotic disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/01/2024 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of the Order Summary Report indicated on 11/01/2024 Resident #1 had an order for an antipsychotic 25mg (milligrams) tablet twice a day. On 01/08/2025, the antipsychotic was reduced to 25mg at bedtime, reduced to 25mg, 0.5 tablet on 01/20/2025, and discontinued on 01/27/2025. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan, dated 11/19/2024, revealed Resident #1 was at risk for elopement, with interventions to offer pleasant diversions, food, activities, television, and conversation. Resident #1 was at risk for falls, and on 12/23/24 had an unwitnessed fall, with an intervention to toilet every two hours. A review of the Nursing Admit Readmit Quarterly Assessment, dated 02/06/2025, section M2, revealed Resident #1 had a diagnosis of dementia, did not wander, and was able to follow direction. An elopement risk assessment for Resident #1 revealed a score of 9, indicating the resident was at risk to wander. A review of the Nursing Elopement Risk with Care Plan revealed on 02/28/2025 Resident #1 had a history of wandering, a diagnosis of dementia, had eloped from the facility, and had an elopement risk assessment score of 13, which indicated the resident was at high risk for elopement. A review of the Soc/Act Social Services Resident Room Change, effective date 2/20/2025, indicated on 02/20/2025 Resident #1 was moved from the closed unit to 100 [NAME] Hall. On 02/28/2025 at 07:38 AM, a facility video of the front door showed Resident #1 approaching the door, pressing the release bar of the door until the door opened, setting off an alarm. Resident #1 was visible on video exiting the front door. On 02/28/2025 at 07:39 AM, the Office Aide was seen on video walking to the front door, turning off the alarm, and glancing out the front door through the glass before walking to the front desk, sitting down, and picking up a cellphone. On 02/28/2025 at 07:41 AM, the Office Aide took a telephone call on the facility phone, with the call ending at 07:42 AM. The Office Aide walked from behind the desk and to the window on the right side of the lobby. On 02/28/2028 at 07:42 AM, the Office Aide walked to the front entrance and exited the building. On 02/28/2025 at 07:43:59 AM, the Office Aide walked back into the building and sat at the front desk. On 02/28/2025 at 07:44 AM, the Office Aide picked up a cell phone and looked toward the front entrance. Review of the (named area) Communications dispatch call log showed on 02/28/2025 at 08:23:36 AM, a call was received from Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 reporting an older resident (Resident #1) had gotten out of the facility and was walking toward the hospital, description given. Resident #1 left the facility at 07:38 AM. At 08:26:30 AM, LPN #3 advised the dispatcher Resident #1 had been found. At 08:27 AM, police units were advised Resident #1 had been found. In an interview on 03/10/2025 at 04:49 PM, Resident #1 confirmed the resident left the facility unsupervised, but did not remember when or why the resident left. Resident #1 reported the resident just went for a long walk. On 03/11/2025 at 08:30 AM, the Maintenance Director provided Weekly Exit Door Inspections since January and indicated the front door was in good working condition. He revealed that the front door would open if the door bar was held down for 15 seconds. In an interview on 03/11/2025 at 10:35 AM, the Office Aide stated on 2/28/2025 she rushed from the bathroom because she heard the front door alarm, turned off the door alarm, looked out the windows, the side first then the front windows, and did not see any residents, went to the desk and answered the facility phone. The Office Aide said that she failed to tell staff the door alarm went off so they could count residents and failed to notify the Director of Nursing (DON) or Administrator right away. The Office Aide revealed a family member had previously informed her Resident #1 was a wanderer. The Office Aide revealed she was in-serviced on elopement when she was hired, and with yearly competencies. In an interview on 03/11/2025 at 11:00 AM, the CNA Supervisor stated on 2/28/2025 Resident #1 left the building without supervision. CNA #8 told the CNA Supervisor Resident #1 could not be located. The CNA Supervisor and CNA #8 searched 100-Hall, East and [NAME] side of the building, and were unable to locate Resident #1. The CNA Supervisor notified the DON and called a Code Green for elopement. The CNA Supervisor stated she got into her car and drove away from the facility to search for Resident #1 and located Resident #1 walking near the ballfields at (specific location) Park, approximately 1.25 miles away from the facility. The CNA Supervisor described Resident #1 as being exhausted, dragging, and easily directed into her car to return to the facility. The CNA Supervisor said facility policy was not followed, when the alarm was turned off and no notification was made to other staff in the building so all residents could be accounted for. On 03/11/2025 at 12:45 PM, the surveyor reviewed front door video with the Administrator. The Administrator identified Resident #1, wearing a red beanie, pressed down on the bar of the door until it opened, and the alarm sounded. The Administrator identified the Office Aide, who walked to the front door and turned the alarm off, returned to the desk, picked up her cellphone, and answered the facility phone. The Administrator stated when she pulled up to facility at 08:06 AM and staff called and told her Resident #1 had left the building, she immediately searched the grounds, and went to the back of the facility because there is a large drop off to the rear of the building and she wanted to check for herself that Resident #1 had not fallen at the drop off. The Administrator stated the facility failed when the Office Aide turned off the alarm and did not physically go outside and look immediately to see if a resident went out the front door. The Administrator revealed walking down the road between the facility and (the park where Resident #1 was found) was a concern because of traffic. The Administrator was not sure if any waterways were between the facility and (the park), and confirmed staff were in-serviced for elopement on hire, and with a yearly in-service. During a second interview on 03/11/2025 at 1:15 PM, the Office Aide said that it took her about one minute to get to the front door, and if someone was at the nurse's station it would show them what door was alarming. I glanced out the front glass doors and did not see anyone. The Office Aide stated that after talking on the phone she thought two minutes had passed and went outside to check more thoroughly. The Office Aide did not see anyone and came back inside the facility. The Office Aide did not notify the staff, charge nurse, DON, or Administrator of the alarm sounding. In an interview on 03/11/2025 at 01:30 PM, LPN #3 confirmed Resident #1 resided on [NAME] Hall, and stated she was notified by CNA #8 that Resident #1 could not be located. LPN #3 checked around the building, could not find Resident #1, and called the police. LPN #3 stated the [NAME] nurse ' s station panel did not have an indicator for the front door alarm. LPN #3 stated if an alarm was heard, LPN #3 would check the panel to see what door it was and would turn off the alarm if a resident was not observed outside the facility glass door. LPN #3 stated she would not go outside to check because in the past staff set the alarms off taking too long to put in the code, or when taking residents out to smoke. The surveyor asked LPN #3 to confirm when an alarm went off, she would turn it off and would not have gone outside to look around because staff were setting off alarms taking too long to put in the code, and when taking residents out to smoke, which LPN #3 confirmed. LPN #3 stated training was provided yearly on elopement. In an interview on 03/11/2025 at 01:49 PM, LPN #7 stated the front door alarm sounded on the East panel and confirmed Resident #1 left the building unsupervised on 02/28/2025, that she did not hear the alarm sound, but may not have been at the nurse's station to hear the alarm. In a phone interview on 03/11/2025 at 04:18PM, CNA #8 revealed that she was familiar with Resident #1 and confirmed the resident eloped on 02/28/2025. CNA #8 said that Resident #1 was a good eater and the morning of 02/28/2025 she noted that Resident #1's breakfast tray was still on the rack. She looked in the bathroom and started searching for the resident. Resident #1 was not in the dining room, and she became concerned and started asking everyone to please help her look for him. Housekeepers #9 and #10 thought Resident #1 had gone to smoke. We looked everywhere, and a Housekeeper and I went out the front door and split up and ran around the building, but did not find (Resident #1). I heard someone call Code Green, and it was not long after Resident #1 was found and returned to the facility. Resident #1 was described as very tired when (the resident) came back, walking slower than usual, and staff got a wheelchair and took Resident #1 to the locked unit. On 03/12/2025 at 08:27AM, Housekeeper #9 said she was aware Resident #1 left the building without supervision. She said Resident #1 left (the resident's) room that morning and said (the resident) was leaving and would see us later, I assumed (pronoun) went outside to smoke. Housekeeper #9 said she was in-serviced on elopement a few weeks ago when she was hired, and after the incident. In an interview on 03/12/2025 at 08:29AM, Housekeeper #10 revealed she was training Housekeeper #9 on 2/28/25 and saw Resident #1 come out of the resident's room and was given permission to clean resident's room. Resident #1 said (the resident) was leaving and I assumed (pronoun) was eating breakfast or smoking. Had the resident said (the resident) was leaving the facility Housekeeper #10 said she would have notified the nurse. Housekeeper #10 confirmed everyone was in-serviced about elopement on hire, after the incident, and with yearly competencies. On 03/12/2025 at 11:40 AM, the Administrator provided a missing in-service signature sheet dated 2/28/2025. The Administrator said that she and nursing immediately started educating everyone in the facility, the morning of 02/28/2025 and calling staff to come be in-serviced. She revealed that signatures were done over second and third shift with the help of nursing services, suggesting an end date of 03/01/2025. The Administrator provided a copy of in-services on Code Green dated 02/28/2025. On 3/12/2025, the route Resident #1 followed to travel from the facility to the park where the resident was found was examined by the surveyor. Resident #1 would have traveled approximately 3,588 feet westward on Arkansas Highway 123, passing a densely wooded plot of land on the left. Resident #1 then turned north on a local street, traveling approximately 1500 feet. On this street the resident would have transversed a bridge spanning a creek before arriving at the park.
Apr 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who reside on the secure unit were fed in a manner that provided dignity to each resident. This failed practice had the abil...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who reside on the secure unit were fed in a manner that provided dignity to each resident. This failed practice had the ability to effect 28 residents residing on the secured unit. The findings are: a. On 04/09/2024 at 12:23 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 was providing feeding assistance to a resident in the secure unit while standing over them. b. On 04/09/2024 at 12:27 PM, CNA #3 was standing while providing feeding assistance to a resident in the secure unit. c. On 04/09/2024 at 12:29 PM, CNA #1 was standing while providing feeding assistance to a resident in the secure unit. d. On 04/09/2024 at 12:33 PM, CNA #1 was asked, How do you feed residents that need help with dining? She said, We offer them food and drinks. e. On 04/09/2024 at 12:44 PM, CNA #2 was asked, When helping more than one resident to eat what should you do between residents? She said, We make sure the residents are ok. f. On 04/09/2024 at 12:52 PM, CNA#3 was asked, When in the dining room helping feed residents why do we perform hand hygiene? She said, To keep from transferring germs, cross contamination. g. On 04/09/2024 at 01:07 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 was asked, When feeding a resident should we be standing or sitting? LPN #1 said, Most likely sitting to be eye level with the residents, but there are too many of them. h. On 04/11/2024 at 03:59 PM, the Administer provided a document titled, Residents Rights that included the excerpt, .Each resident has the right to be treated with consideration, respect, and full recognition of dignity and individuality .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interview and manufacturer guidelines, the facility failed to ensure two (300 Hall and 600 Hall) of six medication carts assessed had medication properly labeled with an open da...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interview and manufacturer guidelines, the facility failed to ensure two (300 Hall and 600 Hall) of six medication carts assessed had medication properly labeled with an open date. The findings are: On 04/11/2024 at 10:04 AM, the Surveyor observed an open bottle of eye drops on the 300 Hall medication cart with no open date. The medication was received from the pharmacy with a date of 02/28/2024. On 04/11/2024 at 10:33 AM, the Surveyor observed (1) an open bottle of eye drops on the 600 Hall medication cart with no open dated. The medication was received from the pharmacy on 02/09/2024. (2) An open inhaler with no open date or received date from pharmacy. (3) A second open bottle of eye drops with no open date. The medication was received from the pharmacy on 02/22/2024. On 04/11/2024 at 10:39 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) #4 confirmed there were no open dates on the inhaler or eye drops located on the 600 Hall medication cart. On 04/11/2024 at 10:05 AM, the Surveyor asked the Director of Nursing (DON), Should there be an open date on eye drops and inhalers? The DON stated, If there is not an open date wrote on the medication when it is opened then we go by the pharmacy received date on the package. The DON confirmed there was not an open date on the Latanoprost eye drop bottle located on the 300 Hall medication cart. A document received by the DON on 04/12/2024 at 08:49 AM titled, [named brand] Olopatadine Ophthalmic Solution 0.2% showed, .discard 4 weeks after opening . A document received by the DON on 04/12/2024 at 08:49 AM titled, [named brand] Inhalation Aerosol Approval 2020 showed, .throw away your inhaler in household trash .3 months after your inhaler has been removed from the foil pouch . A document received by the DON on 04/12/2024 at 08:49 AM titled, [named brand of eye drops] (Latanoprost Ophthalmic solution) Package Insert showed, .once a bottle is open for use, it may be store at room temperature up to 25 degrees Celsius (77 degrees Fahrenheit) for 6 weeks . On 04/12/2024 at 09:33 AM, the DON confirmed the package inserts for each of the three identified medications showed discard instructions that had not been followed.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were sealed or covered during meal preparation; and failed to ensure equipment was cleaned, rinsed, and sani...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were sealed or covered during meal preparation; and failed to ensure equipment was cleaned, rinsed, and sanitized to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect 104 residents who received meals from the 1 of 1 affected kitchen. The findings are: A facility policy titled Safe Food handling Practices,dated 02/25/2029, specified, All food is purchased, stored, prepared and distributed in clean safe sanitary manner promoting safe food handling and compliance with state and federal guidelines. To minimize contamination and bacteria while providing nutritious meals. All working surfaces and equipment are clean and sanitized after each use. On 04/10/2024 at 09:45 AM, Dietary Aid #1 was observed using a food processor to puree chili. On 04/10/2024 at 09:53 AM, Dietary Aid #1 placed the food processor into the metal sink with other dirty utensils that was attached to the metal table in the middle of the kitchen. On 04/10/2024 at 09:57 AM, Dietary Aid #1 hand washed the food processor and attachments with dishwashing liquid and rinsed the food processor and attachments under running water. There were bubbles/soap residue on the food processor bowl/container handle. Dietary Aid #1 set the food processor bowl on the edge of the metal table near the sink. Dietary Aid #1 did not sanitize the food processor bowl/container or the attachments. On 04/10/2024 at 09:58 AM, Dietary Aid #1 assembled the food processor attachments to the bowl and placed the food processor bowl on its stand. On 04/10/2024 at 10:01 AM, Dietary Aid #1 removed 14 - 4 oz scoops of cooked green beans from a metal pan and placed them into the unsanitized food processor bowl. On 04/11/2024 at 11:00 AM, Surveyor entered the kitchen and observed a large metal bowl with apple slices covered with sugar. The metal bowl of apples was uncovered and not contained, 3 bowels of vegetable soup observed sitting on a tray near the microwave, uncovered and not contained. Two metal pans of biscuits containing 54 biscuits each, was observed on the metal table uncovered and not contained. On 04/11/2024 at 11:08 AM, 3 bowls of vegetable soup were observed near the microwave uncovered and not contained. On 04/11/2024 at 11:09 AM, Dietary Aid #2 placed two pans of biscuits in the oven. On 04/11/2024 at 11:27 AM, 3 bowls of vegetable soup and 3 bowls of chicken noodle soup were observed near the microwave uncovered and not contained. On 04/11/2024 at 11:28 AM, Dietary Aid #3 was asked who the bowls of soup were for. Dietary Aid #3 replied, It's for residents whoever requested soup. Dietary Aid #3 confirmed there were 3 bowls of vegetable and 3 bowls of chicken noodle soup. Dietary Aid #3 was asked why the soup was uncovered. Dietary Aid #3 stated, I think [Dietary Aid #2] is supposed to microwave it, then she covers it. On 04/11/2024 at 11:30 AM, Dietary Aid #2 was asked why should food be covered while it's sitting out? Dietary Aid #2 stated, So no bugs get in it or it stays at a certain temperature. Dietary Aid #2 was asked, are the bowels of soup supposed to be covered while sitting out? Dietary Aid #2 stated, Yes, I'm supposed to cover it while it's sitting out. On 04/12/2024 at 07:45 AM, The Dietary Manager (DM) was asked what is the cleaning process for the food processor bowl and attachments after preparing pureed food. The DM stated, Wash it out in the sink, rinse it well; after the meal, they put it through the dishwasher. The DM was asked when the food processor bowel was sanitized. The DM stated, After the end of the meal. The DM was asked why equipment used for preparing food should be cleaned, rinsed, sanitized, and be free of soap residue/bubbles? The DM stated, Cleaned, rinsed, and sanitized to prevent any cross contamination and we don't want soap in our food. The DM was asked what the process was for food sitting out during meal preparation. The DM stated, I recommend the food be covered. The DM was asked why food items should be covered during meal preparation. The DM stated, To prevent flies from getting in it, or anything else.
Mar 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands and changed gloves before handling food items to prevent the potential for cross contamination for r...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands and changed gloves before handling food items to prevent the potential for cross contamination for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen and baking products were dated when received to assure first in first out usage to prevent potential for food borne illness. These failed practices had the potential to affect 104 residents who received meals from the kitchen (total census: 106) as documented on a list provided by the Dietary Supervisor on 03/23/23 at 3:02 PM. The findings are: a. On 03/22/23 at 9:18 AM, Dietary Employee (DE) #1 removed a bag of chopped lettuce and loose fresh tomatoes from the walk-in refrigerator and placed them on the counter. He opened a bag of chopped lettuce, a bag of shredded carrots and emptied them into a bowl. Without washing his hands, he placed gloves on his hands, contaminating the gloves. He rinsed the tomatoes and placed them on the cutting board and sliced them. He placed the sliced tomatoes on the mixture of chopped lettuce and shredded carrots. He mixed them with his contaminated gloved hands and placed them on a shelf in the walk-in refrigerator to be served to the residents who received regular and mechanical soft diets for lunch. b. On 03/22/23 at 9:36 AM, there were 2 bottles of Sorghum Molasses on a shelf in the refrigerator in the Hydration Room on the 200 Hall (Unit). The bottles were not dated when received. c. On 03/22/23 at 10:23 AM, DE #6 pushed a cart that contained bowls of soup towards the counter. Without washing her hands, she picked up a plate and a bowl from the clean rack and placed them on the cart with her fingers inside of them. At 10:26 AM, she placed 2 pieces of breaded fish on a plate, transferred them into a baking pan and placed them in the oven. The Surveyor asked, What should you have done after touching dirty objects and before handling clean equipment? She stated, I should have washed my hands. d. On 03/22/23 at 11:00 AM, DE #3 carried a container full of utensils with gloves on his hands. He placed it on the counter, contaminating the gloves. Without changing gloves and washing his hands, he picked up the utensils at the tips that go into the mouth, placed them on napkins and wrapped them for the residents to use when eating their lunch meal. At 12:05 PM, the Surveyor asked DE #3, What should you have done after touching dirty objects and before handling clean equipment? He stated, I should have removed the gloves and washed my hands. e. On 03/22/23 at 11:01 AM, DE #1 picked up a bottle of cooking spray and sprayed inside the pans. He picked up a container of thickener from under the food preparation counter and placed it on the counter. He removed a pan of cut green beans from the food warmer and placed it on the counter. Without washing his hands, he attached a clean blade to the base of the blender and pureed food to be served to the residents for lunch. f. On 03/22/23 at 11:06 AM, DE #4 was wearing gloves on her hands, she untied a bread bag, contaminating the gloves. Without changing gloves and washing her hands, she removed slices of bread from the bag and placed them on the tray to be used for making peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. The Surveyor asked, What should you have done after touching dirty objects and before handling food? She stated, Washed my hands before using gloves. g. On 03/22/23 at 11:16 AM, DE #1 squeezed out a rag that was used to wash the blender bowl. Without washing his hands, he picked up a clean blade and attached to the base of the blender to puree food items to be served to the residents who required pureed diets. When he started to put the food in the blender to puree, the Surveyor immediately stopped him and asked, What should you have done after touching dirty objects and before handling clean equipment? He stated, I should have washed my hands. h. On 03/22/23 at 12:03 PM, DE #5 pushed a cart that contained cartons of cultured butter milk, and cartons of 2% [percent] milk from the walk-in refrigerator towards the counter where clean glasses were stored. She placed gloves on her hands, contaminating the gloves. She used her contaminated gloved hands to pick up glasses that contained beverages by the rims and wrote the date on each lid. The Surveyor asked, What should you have done after touching dirty objects and before handling clean equipment? She stated, I should have washed my hands. i. The facility policy titled, Hand Washing, provided by the Dietary Supervisor on 03/23/23 at 3:02 PM documented, .After engaging in other activities that contaminates the hands .
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 40% turnover. Below Arkansas's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 5 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
Bottom line: Mixed indicators with Trust Score of 66/100. Visit in person and ask pointed questions.

About This Facility

What is Johnson County Health And Rehab, Llc's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns JOHNSON COUNTY HEALTH AND REHAB, LLC an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Johnson County Health And Rehab, Llc Staffed?

CMS rates JOHNSON COUNTY HEALTH AND REHAB, LLC's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 40%, compared to the Arkansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Johnson County Health And Rehab, Llc?

State health inspectors documented 5 deficiencies at JOHNSON COUNTY HEALTH AND REHAB, LLC during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 4 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Johnson County Health And Rehab, Llc?

JOHNSON COUNTY HEALTH AND REHAB, LLC is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 107 certified beds and approximately 113 residents (about 106% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in CLARKSVILLE, Arkansas.

How Does Johnson County Health And Rehab, Llc Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, JOHNSON COUNTY HEALTH AND REHAB, LLC's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (40%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Johnson County Health And Rehab, Llc?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is Johnson County Health And Rehab, Llc Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, JOHNSON COUNTY HEALTH AND REHAB, LLC has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Johnson County Health And Rehab, Llc Stick Around?

JOHNSON COUNTY HEALTH AND REHAB, LLC has a staff turnover rate of 40%, which is about average for Arkansas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Johnson County Health And Rehab, Llc Ever Fined?

JOHNSON COUNTY HEALTH AND REHAB, LLC has been fined $8,281 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Arkansas average of $33,162. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Johnson County Health And Rehab, Llc on Any Federal Watch List?

JOHNSON COUNTY HEALTH AND REHAB, LLC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.