CORNING THERAPY AND LIVING CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Corning Therapy and Living Center has received a Trust Grade of B, indicating it's a good choice for care, though there is room for improvement. The facility ranks #6 out of 218 nursing homes in Arkansas, placing it in the top half, and is the best option among the three homes in Clay County. The facility's trend is stable, maintaining three issues from 2023 to 2024, which suggests consistency in care quality. Staffing is rated average with a turnover rate of 58%, which is close to the state average, indicating some staff stability. However, the center has incurred $8,021 in fines, which is concerning and higher than 85% of Arkansas facilities, pointing to ongoing compliance issues. While the nursing home boasts strong RN coverage-better than 92% of facilities in the state, allowing for better oversight of residents-there have been critical incidents reported. For instance, one resident, who was at high risk for leaving the facility, managed to elope and was found outside, raising serious safety concerns. Additionally, the facility failed to provide adequate activities for residents, with multiple observations noting a lack of engaging activities, which can affect residents' well-being. Overall, while there are strengths in RN oversight and quality measures, families should be aware of the critical safety issues and activity deficiencies.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Arkansas
- #6/218
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $8,021 in fines. Higher than 82% of Arkansas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 39 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Arkansas. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
12pts above Arkansas avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
10 points above Arkansas average of 48%
The Ugly 11 deficiencies on record
Aug 2024
3 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, document review, observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure ade...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure interventions that were implemented in the care plan to promote safety while smoking for one (Resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that activities were provided for all 42 residents that reside in the building. The findings...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for 1 (Resident #6) of 6 (Residents #5, #6, #9, #10, #13, and #310) res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Resident Assessment Instrument Manual 3.0, the facility failed to accurately record the assessment fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an antidepressant medication was not prescribed and administered to a resident who did not have a diagnosis of depression for 1 (Res...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2022
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure baths / showers / oral care were regularly and consistently provided, to maintain good personal hygiene and prevent odors for 1 (Res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0678
(Tag F0678)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure information regarding resident's code status wa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0687
(Tag F0687)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure toenails were trimmed to promote good foot care for 1 (Residents #26) of 21 (Resident #39, #46, #15, #6, #34, #45, #23...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care for management of indwelling urinary catheters were provided in accordance with accepted standards ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify resident representatives or Power of Attorneys (POA) in writ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 11 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • 58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Corning Therapy And Living Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns CORNING THERAPY AND LIVING CENTER an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Corning Therapy And Living Center Staffed?
CMS rates CORNING THERAPY AND LIVING CENTER's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 58%, which is 12 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Corning Therapy And Living Center?
State health inspectors documented 11 deficiencies at CORNING THERAPY AND LIVING CENTER during 2022 to 2024. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 10 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Corning Therapy And Living Center?
CORNING THERAPY AND LIVING CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 42 certified beds and approximately 38 residents (about 90% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in CORNING, Arkansas.
How Does Corning Therapy And Living Center Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, CORNING THERAPY AND LIVING CENTER's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (58%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Corning Therapy And Living Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Corning Therapy And Living Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, CORNING THERAPY AND LIVING CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Corning Therapy And Living Center Stick Around?
Staff turnover at CORNING THERAPY AND LIVING CENTER is high. At 58%, the facility is 12 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Corning Therapy And Living Center Ever Fined?
CORNING THERAPY AND LIVING CENTER has been fined $8,021 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Arkansas average of $33,159. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Corning Therapy And Living Center on Any Federal Watch List?
CORNING THERAPY AND LIVING CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.