BEAR CREEK HEALTHCARE LLC
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Bear Creek Healthcare LLC in De Queen, Arkansas has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice for families, as it is solidly above average. It ranks #54 out of 218 facilities in the state, placing it in the top half, and is the only option in Sevier County. The facility is improving, with reported issues decreasing from 12 in 2023 to 8 in 2024. Staffing is average with a rating of 3 out of 5, and a turnover rate of 48% is slightly below the state average, suggesting that while staff may not stay long-term, they are not leaving at an alarming rate. Notably, there have been no fines reported, which is a positive sign of compliance. However, there are some areas of concern. Recent inspections found that the kitchen failed to properly date and store food items, which could impact the safety of meals for residents. Additionally, care plans for some residents were not updated following incidents, and there were issues with the preparation of pureed foods that did not follow the required nutritional guidelines. While the facility has strengths, including good RN coverage and no fines, these incidents highlight areas that need attention to ensure resident safety and care quality.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Arkansas
- #54/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 48% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 19 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 20 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Arkansas avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
The Ugly 20 deficiencies on record
Oct 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, record review, facility document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician orders were followed as written on telephone order for 1 (Resident #27)...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interviews, record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated to include interventions for incidents for (Resident #16,...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the recipe for pureed foods to maintain nutritional value for 4 ( Resident # 8, #9, #25, and #3...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the minimum data set (MDS) accurately reflected...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #156) oxygen was administered at the physician ordered rate to prevent respiratory complications. This fail...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed during peri care for 1 (Resident #11) to prevent cross contamination and infection. T...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0805
(Tag F0805)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Deficiency Text Not Available
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure (1) that manufacture specifications for season...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2023
12 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure before a resident was allowed to self-administer physician ordered liquid mouthwash for dry mouth, the interdisciplinar...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure privacy was provided to maintain dignity when flushing a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube for 1 (Resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0660
(Tag F0660)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure discharge planning was conducted to promote continuity of care after discharge for 1 (Resident #56) of 1 sampled resident who was di...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0661
(Tag F0661)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to formulate a discharge summary and provide the Resident and/or responsible party with a copy per the facility policy for 1 (Resident #56)...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident (#46) of 1 sampled resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%, to prevent potential complications...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Medication Administration Record (MAR) was followed to prevent a significant medication error which could result ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication (Biotene, a liquid mouthwash for dry mouth) was not left at the bedside for self-administration for 1 (Resident #43) o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0919
(Tag F0919)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were in good working order for 1 (Resident #27) of 5 (Residents #20, #27, #35, #41, and #44) sampled reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff did not stand over Residents while assisting them with eating for 1 (Resident #39), meal trays were removed f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents from the Locked Unit washed their hands after placing hands in the trash can while eating to prevent cross con...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods in the stand-up freezer and chest freezer were properly dated, sealed, and stored in 1 of 1 facility kitchen. Th...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- • 20 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Bear Creek Healthcare Llc's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns BEAR CREEK HEALTHCARE LLC an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Bear Creek Healthcare Llc Staffed?
CMS rates BEAR CREEK HEALTHCARE LLC's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 48%, compared to the Arkansas average of 46%. RN turnover specifically is 67%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Bear Creek Healthcare Llc?
State health inspectors documented 20 deficiencies at BEAR CREEK HEALTHCARE LLC during 2023 to 2024. These included: 20 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Bear Creek Healthcare Llc?
BEAR CREEK HEALTHCARE LLC is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 131 certified beds and approximately 50 residents (about 38% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in DE QUEEN, Arkansas.
How Does Bear Creek Healthcare Llc Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, BEAR CREEK HEALTHCARE LLC's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (48%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Bear Creek Healthcare Llc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Bear Creek Healthcare Llc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, BEAR CREEK HEALTHCARE LLC has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Bear Creek Healthcare Llc Stick Around?
BEAR CREEK HEALTHCARE LLC has a staff turnover rate of 48%, which is about average for Arkansas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Bear Creek Healthcare Llc Ever Fined?
BEAR CREEK HEALTHCARE LLC has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Bear Creek Healthcare Llc on Any Federal Watch List?
BEAR CREEK HEALTHCARE LLC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.