TIMBERLANE HEALTH & REHABILITATION
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Timberlane Health & Rehabilitation has a Trust Grade of C+, which means it is slightly above average but not exceptional. It ranks #135 out of 218 facilities in Arkansas, placing it in the bottom half, and #5 out of 5 in Union County, indicating it has no local competitors that are better. The facility is worsening, with issues increasing from 6 in 2023 to 7 in 2024. Staffing is a strength here, with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 37%, which is significantly lower than the state average of 50%. Although there are no fines on record, recent inspections revealed serious concerns, including a failure to ensure proper hand hygiene, food safety practices, and cleanliness in food storage, which could potentially affect the health of residents. Overall, while Timberlane Health & Rehabilitation has some strengths, particularly in staffing, there are notable weaknesses in food safety and hygiene practices that families should consider.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Arkansas
- #135/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 37% turnover. Near Arkansas's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 23 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (37%)
11 points below Arkansas average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Arkansas average (3.1)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Arkansas avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record
Aug 2024
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure written notification of transfer/discharge to another facility was provided to the resident and/or resident's representative, and th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan addressed a high-risk medication, insulin, to ensure planning was completed for individualized and appropr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0569
(Tag F0569)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to convey a resident's personal funds to the individual or representative administering the individual's estate within 30 days...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to properly lift a resident with the legs open on a mechanical lift for 1 (Reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to have a process in place to...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure hydrocortisone 1/2% was stored in a locked compartment and not left at the bedside for 1 (...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Through observation, interview, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was conducted, that equipment, ut...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents with the use of a stand-up lift; staff were supervised in the use of the stand-up l...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0882
(Tag F0882)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. This failed practice had the poten...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
2. On 09/25/23 at 10:59 AM, observed Resident #322's CPAP mask, nebulizer mouthpiece, and nasal cannula not stored in a bag.
a. On 09/25/23 at 2:23 PM, observed Resident #322's CPAP mask, nebulizer mo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored on the medica...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dented cans were removed from stock; foods were dated when received to assure first in first out usage; scoops used in...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0602
(Tag F0602)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure personal funds were not misappropriated, for 3 (Resident #1, #2, #3) of 3 (resident#1, #2, #3) sampled residents who had money held i...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2022
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the freezer were covered or sealed and dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- • 37% turnover. Below Arkansas's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Timberlane Health & Rehabilitation's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns TIMBERLANE HEALTH & REHABILITATION an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Timberlane Health & Rehabilitation Staffed?
CMS rates TIMBERLANE HEALTH & REHABILITATION's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 37%, compared to the Arkansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Timberlane Health & Rehabilitation?
State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at TIMBERLANE HEALTH & REHABILITATION during 2022 to 2024. These included: 14 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Timberlane Health & Rehabilitation?
TIMBERLANE HEALTH & REHABILITATION is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 106 certified beds and approximately 90 residents (about 85% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in EL DORADO, Arkansas.
How Does Timberlane Health & Rehabilitation Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, TIMBERLANE HEALTH & REHABILITATION's overall rating (3 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (37%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Timberlane Health & Rehabilitation?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Timberlane Health & Rehabilitation Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, TIMBERLANE HEALTH & REHABILITATION has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Timberlane Health & Rehabilitation Stick Around?
TIMBERLANE HEALTH & REHABILITATION has a staff turnover rate of 37%, which is about average for Arkansas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Timberlane Health & Rehabilitation Ever Fined?
TIMBERLANE HEALTH & REHABILITATION has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Timberlane Health & Rehabilitation on Any Federal Watch List?
TIMBERLANE HEALTH & REHABILITATION is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.