GOSNELL HEALTH AND REHAB
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Gosnell Health and Rehab has received a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average quality with some notable concerns. Positioned at #147 out of 218 facilities in Arkansas and #4 out of 4 in Mississippi County, it ranks in the bottom half overall, suggesting limited local options. While the facility shows an improving trend, reducing issues from 6 in 2023 to 3 in 2024, it still faces challenges, including $13,627 in fines, which is higher than 90% of similar facilities, indicating ongoing compliance problems. Staffing is average with a 3/5 star rating and a 56% turnover rate, while RN coverage is also average, meaning they have the ability to catch some issues before they escalate. However, there have been serious incidents, such as a resident sustaining a fractured ankle due to improper transfer protocols, and concerns about food safety and cleanliness practices that could affect residents' health. Families should weigh these strengths and weaknesses carefully when considering this facility.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Arkansas
- #147/218
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 56% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $13,627 in fines. Higher than 85% of Arkansas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 23 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ○ Average
- 10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Arkansas average (3.1)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Near Arkansas avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
8 points above Arkansas average of 48%
The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record
Sept 2024
3 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, record review, observations, and document review, the facility failed to prevent an accident that caused serious injury during a van with lift transfer due to not following the ma...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) for a contracture under Section GG for one out of one sampled residents (Resident #3)...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0687
(Tag F0687)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with foot care were regularly provided with the necessary assistance to maintain goo...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0569
(Tag F0569)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Medicaid recipient residents and/or their responsible parties were notified when the amount in their Trust Fund account was within $...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's representative or Power of Attorney (POA) was...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure insulin vials were dated when opened, and expired medications were removed from the narcotic box. This failed practice had the pot...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's living space (9 of 37 rooms, the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
2. Resident #18 had diagnoses of Acute and Chronic (Congestive) Heart Failure and Emphysema.
a. On 09/26/23 at 8:49 AM Resident #18 was in her room sitting in her wheelchair. Observed a portable oxyge...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the refrigerator and freezer were covered and dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2022
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were promptly and...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 10 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $13,627 in fines. Above average for Arkansas. Some compliance problems on record.
- • Grade D (41/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Gosnell Health And Rehab's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns GOSNELL HEALTH AND REHAB an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Gosnell Health And Rehab Staffed?
CMS rates GOSNELL HEALTH AND REHAB's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 56%, which is 10 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 67%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Gosnell Health And Rehab?
State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at GOSNELL HEALTH AND REHAB during 2022 to 2024. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 9 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Gosnell Health And Rehab?
GOSNELL HEALTH AND REHAB is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by DAVID VANN & BOYD WRIGHT, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 50 certified beds and approximately 48 residents (about 96% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in GOSNELL, Arkansas.
How Does Gosnell Health And Rehab Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, GOSNELL HEALTH AND REHAB's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (56%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Gosnell Health And Rehab?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Gosnell Health And Rehab Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, GOSNELL HEALTH AND REHAB has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Gosnell Health And Rehab Stick Around?
Staff turnover at GOSNELL HEALTH AND REHAB is high. At 56%, the facility is 10 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 67%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Gosnell Health And Rehab Ever Fined?
GOSNELL HEALTH AND REHAB has been fined $13,627 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Arkansas average of $33,215. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Gosnell Health And Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?
GOSNELL HEALTH AND REHAB is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.