GOSNELL HEALTH AND REHAB

700 MOODY STREET, GOSNELL, AR 72315 (870) 532-5550
For profit - Limited Liability company 50 Beds DAVID VANN & BOYD WRIGHT Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
41/100
#147 of 218 in AR
Last Inspection: September 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Gosnell Health and Rehab has received a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average quality with some notable concerns. Positioned at #147 out of 218 facilities in Arkansas and #4 out of 4 in Mississippi County, it ranks in the bottom half overall, suggesting limited local options. While the facility shows an improving trend, reducing issues from 6 in 2023 to 3 in 2024, it still faces challenges, including $13,627 in fines, which is higher than 90% of similar facilities, indicating ongoing compliance problems. Staffing is average with a 3/5 star rating and a 56% turnover rate, while RN coverage is also average, meaning they have the ability to catch some issues before they escalate. However, there have been serious incidents, such as a resident sustaining a fractured ankle due to improper transfer protocols, and concerns about food safety and cleanliness practices that could affect residents' health. Families should weigh these strengths and weaknesses carefully when considering this facility.

Trust Score
D
41/100
In Arkansas
#147/218
Bottom 33%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
6 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
56% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$13,627 in fines. Higher than 85% of Arkansas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 23 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
○ Average
10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 6 issues
2024: 3 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below Arkansas average (3.1)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 56%

Near Arkansas avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $13,627

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: DAVID VANN & BOYD WRIGHT

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (56%)

8 points above Arkansas average of 48%

The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening
Sept 2024 3 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews, record review, observations, and document review, the facility failed to prevent an accident that caused serious injury during a van with lift transfer due to not following the ma...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews, record review, observations, and document review, the facility failed to prevent an accident that caused serious injury during a van with lift transfer due to not following the manufacturer's guidelines for the lift and training for 1 (Resident #199) of 1 resident reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice resulted in Resident #199 sustaining a left ankle fracture on 09/10/2024, and a suspected fracture to the sacrum. The findings are: On 09/17/24 at 11:09 AM, during an interview with [NAME] President of Operations regarding incident he confirmed Certified Nurse Aide #1 (CNA #1) assisted with unloading Resident #199. CNA #1 failed to confirm the lift gate was up and ready for the transfer which caused the fall. CNA #1 was suspended until the end of the facility investigation, then terminated. On 09/17/24 at 11:11 AM, Director of Nursing (DON) interviewed regarding the incident on 09/10/2024 involving Resident #199. When asked what her immediate action was following the incident, she confirmed she assessed Resident #199 then sent the resident to the nearest emergency department for an evaluation and treatment. She confirmed provider and family were notified. On 09/17/24 at 11:31 AM, Resident #199 was interviewed regarding incident. Resident stated, I was just sitting there in the van waiting to be taken back in and all of a sudden I was falling backwards. It happened very quick. My body was all catawampus, and was like a V, my legs came up to my body. Resident confirmed pain level was controlled with current treatment. On 09/17/24 at 02:04 PM, Maintenance Director was interviewed regarding mechanical actions/demonstration of lift on the 2018 van. Staff demonstrated the process of loading and unloading residents in wheelchairs. He demonstrated the warning threshold plate working properly (safety mechanism to warn the gate is not up). During an interview on 09/17/24 at 2:30 PM, CNA #7 stated she returned from assisting the first resident into the building and came back to assist CNA #1 with the last resident (Resident #199). The lift gate was down from the first transfer, and stated as she approached the van, she saw Resident #199 fall from the van in the wheelchair, and then CNA #1 fell out of the van soon after. CNA #7 confirmed she completed re-training on about 09/12/2024. On 09/17/24 at 2:40 PM, the Maintenance Director was interviewed regarding the van transport wheelchair training 01/16/2024. He confirmed CNA #1 was present for the class. Maintenance Director confirmed he attended the re-training for van transfers on 09/12/2024. On 09/17/24 at 02:44 PM, the Administrator was interviewed regarding the incident involving Resident #199. The Administrator confirmed CNA #1 did not follow the manufacturer's guidelines or the training, which CNA #1 last completed on January 16, 2024. On 09/17/24 at 03:27 PM, CNA #1 was interviewed regarding the incident on 9/10/2024. She stated, I assisted [CNA #7] in undoing the floor strap for the other resident. CNA #7 took the other resident inside the building, and I was in the process of undoing the floor strap for Resident #199 and preparing to transfer the resident. I said okay, and then I heard CNA #7 say okay, so I thought that meant she was ready and the lift was up, so I proceeded to push the resident to the edge, then both of us fell and that's when I knew the gate was not up. When asked if she looked to see if the gate was lifted, she stated, I am too short to see over the resident in the wheelchair. When asked about safety mechanism to alert gate is not up, CNA #1 stated, Are you talking about the beeping? It always beeps regardless of if it's up or down. CNA #1 stated, My last transfer training was at least two years ago. When asked if CNA #1 had worked as a transporter before her other roles, she stated, Yes, I used to be a transporter, then I switched to HR [Human Resources] about 6 years ago, but I was filling in doing transports. On 09/17/24 at 12:17 PM, the surveyor reviewed video footage of the incident that happened on 09/10/2024 at approximately 12:30 PM. The video shows the return of the transport van with two residents, CNA #1 and CNA #7. One resident was unloaded from the transport van without incident by CNA #7 and taken inside the facility. The gate remained lowered. CNA #1 was seen holding the wheelchair, facing the resident, both are located at the rear exit. As CNA #7 walked out of the front door, she walked toward the back of the van and noticed CNA #1 was struggling to hold the wheelchair/resident inside the back of the van. CNA #7 approached the van to assist but was unable to prevent the resident from falling out of the van. Resident #199 fell approximately 24 (measured from floor of van to base of the lift lowered). Resident #199's legs spread outward in opposite directions. The resident remained seated inside the wheelchair. CNA #1 also fell out of the back of the van, and partially landed on the left portion of the wheelchair, struck Resident #199's left leg/foot, pressing the resident's foot against the left foot pedal of the wheelchair. This action potentially caused the fracture to the left ankle. Resident #199 also sustained a suspected fracture to the sacrum (low back area). Reviewed the undated, Operator's Manual for the facility's wheelchair lift. Under the section labeled operation notes, vehicle loading and unloading, it read, The platform must be fully raised (at floor level) and the inner roll stop (bridge plate) must be properly positioned when loading or unloading passengers in or out of vehicle. It is the responsibility of the lift attendant to ensure the platform, and the inner roll stop are properly positioned at floor level when loading and unloading passengers. Review of training provided to CNA #1 on van transfers including the most recent dated 01/16/2024. The training acknowledgement was signed, and the signature matches other signatures in CNA #1 employment file. Other attendees of the van transfer training on 01/16/2024 confirmed CNA #1 was present for that training. A requirement for training included each of the transport staff to demonstrate proper loading and unloading techniques with a focus on understanding all safety measures. Transport staff were required to demonstrate proper operation of the transport van equipment to the instructor. Reviewed facility undated policy titled Accidents and Incidents - Investigating and Reporting Policy and the Facility Van/Vehicle Usage, undated policy which was consistent with the facility's actions following the incident on 09/10/2024. The facility completed an in-service for all staff on Abuse/Neglect dated 09/10/2024. On 09/18/24 at 10:49 AM, interviewed [named] Van and Mobility Mechanic that inspected the transport vans following the incident. He confirmed the safety mechanism on the threshold warning plate would not beep when the gate is fully up and engaged. [Named] Van and Mobility Mechanic also confirmed no repairs were needed on the lift or any other portion of the vans at time of inspection (09/16/2024). During an interview on 09/19/24 at 11:10 AM, CNA #6 confirmed the last training regarding van transport was on 09/13/2024, and attendees were required to demonstrate the skills of loading and unloading residents from the transport van via wheelchair, and safety measures. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's completion of its survey; thus, it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. The facility has implemented the following plan of correction to correct the deficient practice effective 09/11/2024. Facility Plan of Correction: Step #1 Corrective Plan: On 9/10/2024 upon notification of deficient practice, the Administrator/designee immediately disabled the transport van from this incident from all further transports until investigation and review was completed. The transportation aide was not permitted to perform any further transports or transfers until corrective measures were completed and she was suspended from employment pending investigation process. Step #2 Identification of others with the potential of being affected: On 9/10/2024 the DON/Designee determined, through medical record review and transportation data for the last two weeks, that five residents had to potential to be affected and assessed all residents identified to ensure no injuries related to transportation had occurred. Step #3 To ensure deficient practice does not reoccur: On 9/10/2024, the Administrator made alternate arrangements for all resident transports until completion of transportation aide in-services with return demonstration could be completed. The maintenance director assisted in ensuring this staff education was completed. Both facility vans were placed in no transport mode until a thorough van/equipment inspection could be completed. Step #4 Monitoring: Administrator/designee will monitor loading and unloading of residents to facility vans for transport 3 times a week times 4 weeks minimally or until compliance is achieved. Findings will be documented on a monitoring log. Any negative findings will be corrected immediately, and Administrator/Designee notified. Step #5 QA Administrator/designee will present all findings to the monthly QA committee for further review and recommendations. The facility alleged compliance on 09/13/2024 The facility has implemented their Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement plan, and all steps have been completed, or if ongoing, has been initiated. The following are the goals listed with progress: 1. All staff members who will be driving the van will have a valid driver's license and approved driving record. Completed 09/11/2024 2. All staff members who will be driving the van or assisting during transport will be trained per manufacturer's guidelines/operator training videos and facility checklist. This will include instruction on lift operation and use of a sure-lock restraint system. Completed on 09/13/2024 3-service will be initiated when an incident occurs that involves the van. 4. The van must be taken out of service until deemed safe to use by [named] Van & Mobility of named city. All incidents/accidents involving the van will immediately be reported to the administrator/DON or designee. Incidents/accidents involving the van will be investigated and an incident report completed. Completed: 09/16/2024 and ongoing for continued monitoring. 5. Transports from facility will be monitored by a trained staff member 3 x weekly for 4 weeks, or until compliance is achieved. The above plan will be presented to the QAA committee, and any negative findings will be corrected immediately and reported to the QAA committee. Completed: This plan was starting immediately, but the facility chose to make alternative transport arrangements for all residents and halt all van transfers until they received the documentation from the van inspection which was 9/16/24, and the plan is ongoing. 6. Maintenance Inspection: Regional maintenance consultant will review van maintenance plan with maintenance director immediately and quarterly thereafter. Completed: 09/12/2024 and ongoing. 7. The van driver will perform a pre-transport documented inspection daily, prior to the first transport. 09/11/2024 and ongoing. 8. The facility will maintain a current list of employees who have been trained to drive the van and assist with transportation along with supporting documentation regarding training. Completed:09/13/2024 and ongoing. 9. Any transport driver found not following the appropriate transport policies will be immediately taken off transportation duty and disciplined up to and including termination. The staff member involved in the incident on 09/10/2024 was terminated after the facility's completed investigation. Completed: 09/11/2024 and ongoing. The facility implemented a plan for retraining all transport staff which was completed on several different dates, but the final transport staff member completed the training on 09/13/2024. The staff watched the manufacturer training video linked below: https://youtube.com/watch?v=vDLdUXcotEc&si=LgpoAUyOrtwuHRJV The transport staff completed training along with demonstration of the skills of loading and unloading a resident in a wheelchair. Training also included safety measures for safe transportation of residents. This training will be ongoing.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) for a contracture under Section GG for one out of one sampled residents (Resident #3)...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) for a contracture under Section GG for one out of one sampled residents (Resident #3). These are the findings: A review of the Order Summary revealed Resident #3 had a diagnosis of stroke with left sided weakness/paralysis. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/05/2024 reveals that Resident #3 scored a 12 (moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). A review of Section GG in the MDS reveals that for upper limited mobility was marked no impairment. On 09/16/2024 at 11:36 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #3 in bed with left hand contracture with no intervention in place. Surveyor observed that Resident #3 could not stretch the hand out, and they stated, that they have had the contracture for a while. On 09/16/2024 at 3:00 PM Surveyor observed Resident #3 up in wheelchair with left hand contracture and no interventions. On 09/19/2024 at 9:25 AM, during an interview Certified Nursing Assistant #4 (CNA) stated that resident has had a contracture since admission, and they were not aware of any interventions for contracture. On 09/19/2024 at 9:45 AM, during an interview Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5 stated that Resident #3 has had a contracture since admission and I believe we do range of motion for the contracture. On 09/19/2024 at 9:29 AM, during an interview the MDS Coordinator confirmed that limited mobility is not marked on Section GG for Resident #3's contracture. The MDS Coordinator stated an accurate assessment is important because that is what care is being provided to the resident and gives an accurate description of the resident. MDS Coordinator continued Resident #3 without an accurate assessment does not help capture what is needed for interventions to prevent it from worsening. On 09/19/2024 at 10:15 AM, during an interview the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that an accurate assessment populates the care plan with interventions for how we take care of the resident. The DON then stated that for a contracture an accurate assessment is needed to maintain and treat the contracture, and to be able to add interventions in the care plan. On 09/19/2024 at 10:25 AM, the MDS Consultant stated that the facility follows the RAI Manual for MDS and there are no separate policies.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0687 (Tag F0687)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with foot care were regularly provided with the necessary assistance to maintain goo...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with foot care were regularly provided with the necessary assistance to maintain good hygiene and grooming, as evidenced by failure to ensure toenails were kept clean and trimmed for one resident of one sampled resident. (Resident #24). These are the findings: Review of an Order Summary Report revealed that Resident #24 had diagnoses of dementia, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, and need for assistance with personal care. There was no order for diabetic nail care for the nursing staff. Review of a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/23/2024 revealed that Resident #24 scored a 4 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Review of a Care Plan initiated on 03/26/2024 revealed that Resident #24 had an activity of daily living (ADL) deficit that stated to check nail length, trim, and clean on bath day and as necessary. Report any changes to the nurse. On 09/16/2024 at 11:16 AM, Surveyor observed Resident #24 sitting in a recliner with uncovered feet propped up, toenails were long, jagged, and thick, the right greater toenail was jagged and missing the middle part of the toenail. Resident #24 stated my toenails are long and that one missing part of the toenail is worrying me; I would like to have them trimmed. On 09/17/2024 at 9:30 AM, Surveyor observed that toenail care had not been done. On 09/18/2024 at 3:00 PM, Surveyor observed that toenail care had not been done. On 09/18/2024 at 4:00 PM, during an interview Certified Nursing Assistant #3 (CNA) stated that the nails had not been reported as Hospice usually gives Resident #24 a bath. CNA #3 then stated Resident #24 usually does not need much help either. CNA #3 then described the nails as long, thick, jagged especially that one big toe and that they needed trimmed. CNA #3 stated the nurse does nail care as the resident is diabetic, otherwise a CNA does it as needed. CNA #3 then stated the toenails in the current condition could set up an infection or sores as they could snag on the resident's shoes or socks ripping the nail. On 09/18/2024 at 4:14 PM, during an interview Licensed Practical Nurse #5 (LPN #5) stated Resident #24's toenails had not been reported to them, and that they look terrible and need to be taken care of. LPN #5 then stated the resident was a diabetic and nail care was important as they can be ripped off by snagging on shoes, socks or blankets. LPN #5 continued it could set up sore or infection. LPN #5 confirmed they did not have a current order for diabetic nail care for Resident #24. On 09/19/2024 at 10:15 AM, during an interview the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that having orders for diabetic nail care was important so the staff could actually perform and chart on nail care. The DON then stated nailcare was for skin protection, not cutting themselves, and overall health for diabetics to not cause sores or infection. Review of a facility policy Fingernails/Toenails, Care of revealed, General Guidelines 1 . Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming. 2. Proper nail care can aid in the prevention of skin problems around the nail bed. 3. Unless otherwise permitted, do not trim the nails of diabetic residents or residents with circulatory impairments. 4. Trimmed and smooth nails prevent the resident from accidentally scratching and injuring his or her skin. 5. Watch for and report any changes in the color of the skin around the nail bed. blueness of the nails, any signs of poor circulation, cracking of the skin between the toes, any swelling, bleeding, etc. 6. Stop and report to the nurse supervisor if there is evidence of ingrown nails, infections, pain, or if nails are too hard or too thick to cut with ease.
Sept 2023 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0569 (Tag F0569)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Medicaid recipient residents and/or their responsible parties were notified when the amount in their Trust Fund account was within $...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Medicaid recipient residents and/or their responsible parties were notified when the amount in their Trust Fund account was within $200 of the maximum Medicaid recipient cash assets for 3 (Residents #9, #18 and #30) of 12 (Residents #1, #8, #9, #18, #23, #24, #25, #26, #30, #32, #36 and #41) sampled residents who had Medicaid coverage and had Trust Funds managed by the facility. The findings are: 1. On 09/27/23 at 1:00 PM, the Surveyor received the resident Trust Fund balances from the Business Office Manager (BOM) and noted Resident #9 had a balance of $1877.93, Resident #18 had a balance of $1867.97, and Resident #30 had a balance of $1892.90. 2. On 09/27/23 at 2:48 PM, the Surveyor asked the BOM for the documentation regarding the Medicaid notification letters for Resident #9, Resident #18, and Resident #30. The BOM stated she had not sent out the notification letters. The Surveyor asked how do you let resident/family know that they are approaching the maximum amount allowed by Medicaid. The BOM stated, I send out a letter, but I just overlooked them for this month. 3. On 09/27/23 at 4:55 PM, The Administrator stated, We do not have a Personal Fund Policy.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's representative or Power of Attorney (POA) was...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's representative or Power of Attorney (POA) was notified after a resident choked and the Heimlich Maneuver was performed for 1 (Resident #32) of 1 sampled resident. The findings are: 1. On 09/26/23 at 11:09 am, during Resident Council Meeting a resident stated, I just wanted to give kudos to [Name], the Activity Director, for helping the man [Resident #32] seated across the table from me in Bingo, who choked on the [Name] candy. She did the Heimlich and saved him. 2. On 09/27/23 at 1:49 pm, the Surveyor asked the Activity Director/Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, Can you tell me about an incident that happened during an activity this week? Activity Director/CNA #1 stated, Oh yes. On Monday afternoon after Bingo, I was passing out snacks when a resident at the table with Resident #32 reported to me that the resident seated beside him was choking. I told the transport driver to go get the nurse, but I didn't feel she came quick enough, so I did the Heimlich on him. The Surveyor asked, Who came to assist you? CNA #1 stated, The Director of Nursing (DON) was the first person to get there, but I had already gotten the [Candy] up. Then a second nurse came. The Surveyor asked, What did they do then? CNA #1 stated, They asked me if anything came up and I told them yes a [Candy], and then they took him away to his room. 3. On 09/28/23 at 10:12 am, the Surveyor asked the DON Who was notified of the incident? The DON stated, I know the provider was notified to see if he wanted to do anything. The Surveyor asked, Who else should be notified? The DON stated, The [Family Member], [Charge Nurse] should have documented it in the progress note. 4. Resident #32's Progress Notes from 09/01/23 to 09/28/23 did not address the choking incident or that anyone was notified of the incident.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure insulin vials were dated when opened, and expired medications were removed from the narcotic box. This failed practice had the pot...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure insulin vials were dated when opened, and expired medications were removed from the narcotic box. This failed practice had the potential to affect 8 residents who received insulin off the medication cart for the 100 and 200 Halls, and (1) resident with an expired narcotic card. The findings are: 1. On 9/27/23 at 2:07 PM, the following observations were made in the Medication Room: a. The Medication Cart had one opened vial of Novolog Insulin with no open date on it. b. The Medication Cart had one card of Trazadone with an expiration date of 9/14/23 in the locked narcotic box. c. On 9/27/23 at 2:28 PM, the Surveyor asked Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 how often do you check your medication cart for expired medications. LPN #3 stated, When I can. d. On 9/29/23 at 9:34 AM, the Surveyor asked the Director of Nursing (DON) how often do you check the carts for expired medications? The DON stated, Assistant Director of Nursing [ADON], and myself check it monthly. The night shift nurses check it randomly and the Pharmacy Consultant checks it monthly. The Surveyor asked when do you date a bottle of insulin? The DON stated, When you open it. e. A facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, provided by the Administrator on 9/29/23 at 9:57 AM documented, .2. The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining storage . 4. The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals . 9. Medications requiring refrigeration must be stored in a refrigerator located in the drug room .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's living space (9 of 37 rooms, the...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's living space (9 of 37 rooms, the hallways (1 of 4), shower rooms (2 of 2) and equipment were clean and well maintained. The failed practice had the ability to affect all residents who live in the facility, who utilize the common areas and shower rooms according to the census and condition which was provided by the administrator on 9/25/23 at 1:30 PM. The findings are: Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] B: a. On 09/25/23 at 11:58 AM, observed a medication cup sitting on the windowsill. The cup was approximately 1/2 full of a white granulated substance. The Surveyor asked the resident if he was aware of what was in the cup. The resident stated, That started out as cream for my butt, but it's been there while. Three tiny spiders were in the area surrounding the cup and dead bugs extending down the length of the windowsill from side to side. b. On 09/26/23 at 9:30 AM, observed holes in the left wall. The dead insects and the medication cup 1/2 full of a white granulated substance continued to be on the windowsill. 2. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] A: a. On 09/25/23 at 1:30 PM, observed in the bathroom a full trash can and discarded paper towels on the floor. The toilet seat had multiple, permanent discolored areas on top. In two places the top layer of porcelain was broken and chipped away. The toilet contained a yellow liquid, and 4 gnats were flying around the area of the toilet. Next to the resident ' s bed the floor was sticky. b. On 09/26/23 at 9:08 AM, the bathroom continued to have trash in the floor, gnats flying around, and the toilet seat remained discolored, broken, and chipped. 3. Shower room [ROOM NUMBER]: a. On 09/26/23 at 8:40 AM, the wall immediately to the left upon entry had missing plaster just above the baseline. The area was covered in a black substance. The floor around the wall by the toilet contained caked dirt and debris against the baseline. The white pad on top of a shower gurney on the right side of the room was cracked exposing the padding and allowing water to enter and exit the pad creating a risk of cross contamination. Under the pad was an additional crack the length of the pad. The blue mesh the pad rests on had areas where water had pooled and dried. The area was dark grey and black with white flecks. 4. Shower room [ROOM NUMBER]: a. On 09/26/23 at 8:45 AM, observed in Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] two bath gurneys. The white pad on top of one of the bath gurneys had multiple cracks allowing water to enter and exit creating the risk of cross contamination. The blue mesh had areas where water had pooled and dried. The area was discolored and contained flecks of debris in various colors extending down the length of the gurney. A shower chair was sitting in the front shower area. The joints where the legs and frame intersect were discolored with a buildup of dirt, soap scum and other debris. All 4 wheels casings contained a black/dark gray substance. 5. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] B: a. On 09/27/23 at 2:05 PM, the walls in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]B had multiple scraps and areas in need of paint. 6. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: a. On 09/27/23 at 2:20 PM, the floor of the bathroom in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was sticky and the bathroom had a strong smell of urine. 7. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: a. On 09/27/23 at 2:32 PM, the floor of the bathroom of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was sticky. 8. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: a. On 09/27/23 at 2:35 PM, in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], food was spilled on the floor in the middle of the room, on the top sheet and extended down the side of the bed and onto the floor. On top of the overbed table was 2 cups of liquid, a water pitcher, and a discarded napkin. The surface of the table was covered with a white powdery substance. 9. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: a. On 09/27/23 at 2:40 PM, in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], the 2 walls surrounding the resident's bed were scraped with paint missing. In the bathroom sink there was a washcloth with 8 small flying insects on it. 10. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: a. On 09/27/23 at 2:45 PM, in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], there was a dried dark substance stuck to the floor. The substance was close to the bed and had been tracked to the middle of the room. 11. 300 Hall: a. On 09/27/23 at 2:50 PM, observed scrapes with missing paint on the walls on the 300 Hall. Toward the end of the hall, on the left side was a gouge approximately 8 inches long right above the base board. 12. On 09/29/23 at 8:55 AM, the Surveyor asked Housekeeper #1 what the process was for cleaning a room. Housekeeper #1 stated, First we wipe down all the furniture and the beds. We strip off the linen. The floors are swept, sometimes three times a day. The Surveyor asked if the windowsills were normally part of the cleanup. She stated, Yes.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

2. Resident #18 had diagnoses of Acute and Chronic (Congestive) Heart Failure and Emphysema. a. On 09/26/23 at 8:49 AM Resident #18 was in her room sitting in her wheelchair. Observed a portable oxyge...

Read full inspector narrative →
2. Resident #18 had diagnoses of Acute and Chronic (Congestive) Heart Failure and Emphysema. a. On 09/26/23 at 8:49 AM Resident #18 was in her room sitting in her wheelchair. Observed a portable oxygen tank in the room, the gauge was on zero. The Surveyor accompanied LPN #1 to Resident #18's room and asked LPN #1 to check the oxygen. She stated, It's empty. The Surveyor asked if the resident was to receive oxygen continuously. LPN #1 stated, Yes. The Surveyor asked when the portable tanks are checked and changed. She stated, The night shift got her up and they should have put on a new tank. The Director of Nursing (DON) stated, During my rounds this morning I checked her oxygen, and she had some. b. The Physicians Orders dated 05/21/23 noted Resident #18 may have oxygen at 4 liters per minute via nasal cannula every shift. c. The Comprehensive Care Plan with an initiated date of 05/21/23 noted Resident #18 had oxygen at 4 liters per minute via nasal Cannula. 3. A facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, with a revision date of October 2010, provided by the Administrator on 09/28/23 at 11:28 am documented, .The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Preparation 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure . Equipment and Supplies . Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure portable oxygen was used when transporting a resident who required continuous oxygen for 1 (Resident #10) and oxygen tanks were checked to ensure the resident was receiving oxygen as ordered by the Physician for 1 (Resident #18) of 2 (Residents #10 and #18) sampled resident who received oxygen. The findings are: 1. Resident #10 had diagnoses of Chronic Respiratory Failure, Unspecified whether with Hypoxia or Hypercapnia. a. On 09/27/23 at 2:05 pm, Resident #10 was seated in a wheelchair being pushed by staff down the hall from the therapy room. Resident #10 had her nasal cannula in her nose, but the nasal cannula tubing was not connected to an oxygen cylinder and a portable oxygen cylinder was not on the back of the wheelchair. The Surveyor followed the resident down the hall and into her room. The Occupational Therapist connected Resident #10's oxygen tubing to a stationary oxygen tank at the bedside. Resident #10 stated, I'm a little short of breath. The Surveyor asked the Occupational Therapist if Resident #10 had been in therapy. The Occupational Therapist stated, Yes. The Surveyor asked if Resident #10 usually uses oxygen while in therapy. The Occupational Therapist stated, Yes. We have a tank in therapy that the residents use. The Surveyor asked why Resident #10 didn't have a portable tank on the back of her wheelchair. The Occupational Therapist stated, [Resident #10] had one before but says that it hurts her back to have the tank on the back of her chair. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 came into the room and checked Resident #10's oxygen saturation, which was 83. LPN #1 turned up Resident #10's oxygen to 4 liters per minute. The Surveyor asked LPN #1 if the resident had an order to increase the liters. LPN #1 stated, We have standing physician orders. The Surveyor asked if Resident #10 usually uses portable tanks when outside of room. LPN #1 stated, Yes. There was a sling to hold the tank, but it hasn't been on the chair for a while now. I'm not sure what happened to it. b. A Physician Order dated 08/30/23 noted Resident #10 was to receive humidified oxygen at 2 liters per minute every shift for shortness of breath. c. A Physician Order dated 05/04/23 noted Standing Orders may be used. d. The Care Plan with revision date of 08/30/23 noted Resident #10 received oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula as needed. e. The Standing Physician Orders provided by the Administrator on 09/29/23 at 9:57 am noted an order for oxygen at 2 to 4 liters per minute via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath and/or pulse oximeter less than 90%.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the refrigerator and freezer were covered and dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the refrigerator and freezer were covered and dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect 56 residents who received meals from the kitchen (Total Census: 57), as documented on a list provided by the Dietary Supervisor on 09/26/23 at 3:01 PM. The findings are: 1.On 09/25/23 at 11:01 AM, the following observations were made on a shelf in the freezer: a. An opened box of polish sausage. The box was not covered or sealed. b. An opened box of sausage links. The box was not covered or sealed. c. An opened box of diced chicken. The box was not covered or sealed. d. An opened box of fish. The box was not covered or sealed. e. An opened box of briskets. The box was covered or sealed. 2. On 09/25/23 at 11:15 AM, two boxes of breadcrumbs were on a rack in the storage room with an expiration date of 7/20/23. 3. On 09/25/23 at 11:28 AM, Dietary Employee (DE) #1 was wearing gloves on her hands when she touched the recipe book. She used a knife to cut open a bag of shredded carrots and a bag of red cabbage. She emptied them on top of the shredded lettuce in a pan. At 11:29 AM, she removed fresh tomatoes from their original carton on a shelf in the refrigerator and placed them on the cutting board. Without changing gloves and washing her hands, she sliced the tomatoes without rinsing them and placed them on top of the shredded lettuce in a pan on the counter to be served to the residents for the lunch meal. 4. On 09/25/23 at 11:43 AM, DE #2 was wearing gloves on her hands when she turned on the food preparation sink and rinsed a bowl. She then turned off the faucet, contaminating her hands. Without changing gloves and washing her hands, she used her contaminated gloved hand to push tuna into a pan to be used in preparation of tuna casserole. 5. On 09/25/23 at 12:11 PM, during the noon meal service DE #4 was assisting on the tray line and picked up butter tubs and cartons of beverages and placed them on the trays, contaminating her gloves. Without changing gloves and washing her hands, she picked up beverage glasses by their rims and placed them on the trays to be served to the residents for lunch. On 09/26/23 at 11:18 AM, the Surveyor asked DE #4 what should you have done after touching dirty objects and before handling clean equipment? She stated, I should have washed my hands. 6. On 09/25/23 at 3:35 PM, DE #2 picked up the water hose with his bare hand, used it to spray leftover food from inside of the dishes, contaminating her hands. She then placed the dirty dishes in the dirty racks and pushed the racks into the dish washing machine to wash. After the dishes stopped washing, she moved to the clean side of the dishwasher area and picked up clean dishes and placed them on the clean rack to be used in serving the noon meal to the residents. The Surveyor immediately asked what should you have done after touching dirty objects or before handling clean equipment? He stated, I should have washed my hands. 7. On 09/25/23 at 3:42 PM, DE #2 picked up the water hose with her bare hand, used it to spray leftover food from inside of the dishes, contaminating her hands. She then placed the dirty dishes in the dirty racks and pushed the racks into the dish washing machine to wash. After the dishes stopped washing, she moved to the clean side of the dishwasher area and picked up clean dishes and placed them on the clean rack to be used in serving the noon meal to the residents. The Surveyor immediately asked what should you have done after touching dirty objects or before handling clean Equipment? She stated, I should have washed my hands. 8. On 09/26/23 at 11:11 AM, DE #3 picked up a glove box and placed it on the counter. She removed gloves from the box and placed them on her hands, contaminating the gloves. Without changing gloves and washing her hands, she removed slices of bread from the bag and placed them in individual bags. At 11:13 AM, the Surveyor asked DE #4 what should you have done after touching dirty objects and before handling food items or clean equipment? She stated, I should have washed my hands. 9. A facility policy titled, Employee Cleanliness and Handwashing Technique, provided by the Dietary Supervisor on 09/26/23 at 3:01 PM documented, .Dietary department employees are required to wash their hands on the occasions listed below: a. before starting shift b. after breaks . g. after handling dirty dishes . j. any other time deemed necessary .
Jun 2022 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were promptly and...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were promptly and consistently implemented to minimize the potential for fall related injuries and failed to ensure new interventions were developed after a fall for 1 (Resident #45) of 2 (Residents #32 and #45) sampled residents who had falls in the last 30 days. This failed practice had the potential to affect 20 residents who were at high risk for falls according to a list provided by the Nurse Consultant on 6/22/22. The findings are: Resident #45 had diagnoses of Urinary Tract Infection, Dementia, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy and Heart Failure. The admission Minimum Data Set with Assessment Reference Date of 5/12/22 documented the resident scored 9 (8-12 indicates moderately cognitively impaired) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status and required extensive physical assistance of two plus persons for bed mobility, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene, and was totally dependent for transfers. a. The Nursing Admit/Readmit Assessment Care Plan completed upon admission on [DATE] documented the resident scored a 75 on the Morse Fall Scale (45 and higher indicates at high risk for falls), had a previous fall, and was care planned as high risk for falls. b. The Closet Care Plan dated 5/5/22 in the resident's room did not address fall risk. c. The Incident/Accident Report dated 5/31/22 documented, .CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] reported resident [Resident #45] fell out of bed. Received lying on left side with arm under him . [Resident #45] states, 'I was reaching out of bed trying to grab something other night and just wanted to do it again. I reached too far this time and slipped .' .notified DON [Director of Nursing], family member, and on call APRN. [Advanced Practice Registered Nurse] ordered x-ray to L [left] shoulder . d. On 06/22/22 at 8:20 AM, Resident #45 was sitting in bed in his room. Bed was raised to a waist high level and at 45 degrees. e. On 06/22/22 at 8:23 AM, CNA #1 was asked How long have you worked at this facility? CNA #1 replied Six years. CNA #1 was asked, Are you familiar with [Resident #45's] care? CNA #1 replied, Yes. CNA #1 was asked, Is he at risk at for falls? CNA #1 replied, No. We do everything for him. CNA #1 was asked, How do you know what care he needs? CNA #1 replied, It's on his closet care plan. CNA #1 was asked, Has the resident had a fall? CNA #1 replied, Not since I've been here. f. On 06/22/22 at 8:30 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 was asked, Are you familiar with [Resident #45's] care? LPN #1 replied I know him some. LPN #1 was asked, Is he at risk for falls? LPN #1 replied, Yes. LPN #1 was asked, What interventions are in place? LPN #1 replied, Keep his call light within reach, bed lowered, and take to the dining room for meals so he can be supervised. g. On 06/22/22 at 8:35 AM, the Care Plan Coordinator was asked, Are you responsible for care plans? She replied, Yes. She was asked, Who completes the nursing admission/readmit assessment and care plans? She replied, ''Technically the floor nurse, but I also do them. Basically, we put stuff on paper so it can be in the closet care for the CNAs, so they know how to take care of the resident. She was asked, Are you familiar with the [Resident #45's] care? She replied, For the most part yes. She was asked, Was a fall risk assessment completed upon admission for the resident? She replied, How it works, there are a few assessments that will generate for what you can take care of them. So, it's under Morse Fall Scale. She was asked, What was the score of the assessment? She replied, 75. She was asked, What does a score of 75 indicate? She replied, It says 45 or higher is high risk for falls. She was asked, What was done since the resident was at high risk for falls? She replied, It was care planned [on the 48-hour care plan] so aids knew he didn't know his limits and to bring awareness that he is at risk. She was asked, What interventions were put in place? She replied, Other than standard of making sure he needs are met, round every 2 hours, I can't answer off the top of my head. She was asked, Were the intervention put on the comprehensive care plan, and closet care plan? She replied, They should have been. She was asked, Should this information carry over to the closet care plan? She replied, Yes. She was asked, Did [Resident 45] have a fall? She replied, I think he has not, but recently, they did discuss it in a meeting yesterday. She was asked, What was the fall date discussed in the meeting? She replied, 5/31/22. She was asked, What interventions were implemented after the fall? She replied, I did do it yesterday, the 21st. I updated the comprehensive care plan. She was asked, What were the interventions? She replied, Monitor prn [as needed] for 72 hours for signs and symptoms of pain, bruising, change in mental status for any new onset of confusion, or agitation. She was asked, How quickly should interventions be implemented after a fall? She replied, Immediately. She was asked, Has the closet care plan been updated? She replied, No, I've not put a new one down there.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 10 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $13,627 in fines. Above average for Arkansas. Some compliance problems on record.
  • • Grade D (41/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 41/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Gosnell Health And Rehab's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns GOSNELL HEALTH AND REHAB an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Gosnell Health And Rehab Staffed?

CMS rates GOSNELL HEALTH AND REHAB's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 56%, which is 10 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 67%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Gosnell Health And Rehab?

State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at GOSNELL HEALTH AND REHAB during 2022 to 2024. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 9 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Gosnell Health And Rehab?

GOSNELL HEALTH AND REHAB is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by DAVID VANN & BOYD WRIGHT, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 50 certified beds and approximately 48 residents (about 96% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in GOSNELL, Arkansas.

How Does Gosnell Health And Rehab Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, GOSNELL HEALTH AND REHAB's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (56%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Gosnell Health And Rehab?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the facility's high staff turnover rate.

Is Gosnell Health And Rehab Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, GOSNELL HEALTH AND REHAB has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Gosnell Health And Rehab Stick Around?

Staff turnover at GOSNELL HEALTH AND REHAB is high. At 56%, the facility is 10 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 67%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Gosnell Health And Rehab Ever Fined?

GOSNELL HEALTH AND REHAB has been fined $13,627 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Arkansas average of $33,215. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Gosnell Health And Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?

GOSNELL HEALTH AND REHAB is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.