SOUTHRIDGE VILLAGE NURSING AND REHAB
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Southridge Village Nursing and Rehab has a Trust Grade of B, which means it is considered a good choice, performing solidly compared to other facilities. It ranks #81 out of 218 nursing homes in Arkansas, placing it in the top half, and is the best option among the two facilities in Cleburne County. The facility is improving, as it reduced its issues from 6 in 2023 to 3 in 2024, showing a positive trend. While staffing is rated average with a turnover of 46%, which is slightly below the state average, the lack of any fines indicates good compliance with regulations. However, there are some concerns: recent inspections found that staff sometimes failed to wash their hands properly, which could risk the spread of infection, and that food items were not adequately covered in storage, raising potential food safety issues. Overall, Southridge Village has both strengths and weaknesses that families should consider.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Arkansas
- #81/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 46% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 21 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Arkansas avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record
Jul 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Assessments
(Tag F0636)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Deficiency Text Not Available
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to update and revise the care plan to include restorative services for 1 (Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0676
(Tag F0676)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide restorative services to improve or maintain Activities of Daily L...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0687
(Tag F0687)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure toenails were cut to maintain good hygiene and prevent complications for 1 (Resident #93) of 15 (Residents #1, #15, #1...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was consistently administered at the flow rate ordered by the Physician, to minimize the potential for hypoxia,...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0805
(Tag F0805)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump-free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff washed their hands and changed gloves between dirty and clean tasks and before handling clean equipment or food items to minimi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nebulizer masks/tubing/mouthpieces were properly contained when not in use; and the facility failed to ensure Yankauer ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a secure location and according to state laws and accepted standards of pharmacy practice f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility to ensure the environment was as free of potential accident hazards as possible, as evidenced by the failure to ensure medications were...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure housekeeping services were consistently provided to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable living environment and...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2021
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Assessments
(Tag F0636)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed within 14...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a mechanical lift was utilized in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions to minimize the potential for transfe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the freezer and dry storage area were covered or sealed; hot food items were heated to a temperature of at least ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- • 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Southridge Village Nursing And Rehab's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SOUTHRIDGE VILLAGE NURSING AND REHAB an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Southridge Village Nursing And Rehab Staffed?
CMS rates SOUTHRIDGE VILLAGE NURSING AND REHAB's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 46%, compared to the Arkansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care. RN turnover specifically is 62%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Southridge Village Nursing And Rehab?
State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at SOUTHRIDGE VILLAGE NURSING AND REHAB during 2021 to 2024. These included: 14 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Southridge Village Nursing And Rehab?
SOUTHRIDGE VILLAGE NURSING AND REHAB is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 122 certified beds and approximately 89 residents (about 73% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in HEBER SPRINGS, Arkansas.
How Does Southridge Village Nursing And Rehab Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, SOUTHRIDGE VILLAGE NURSING AND REHAB's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (46%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Southridge Village Nursing And Rehab?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Southridge Village Nursing And Rehab Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SOUTHRIDGE VILLAGE NURSING AND REHAB has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Southridge Village Nursing And Rehab Stick Around?
SOUTHRIDGE VILLAGE NURSING AND REHAB has a staff turnover rate of 46%, which is about average for Arkansas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Southridge Village Nursing And Rehab Ever Fined?
SOUTHRIDGE VILLAGE NURSING AND REHAB has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Southridge Village Nursing And Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?
SOUTHRIDGE VILLAGE NURSING AND REHAB is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.