HEATHER MANOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Heather Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average but still has room for improvement. It ranks #107 out of 218 nursing homes in Arkansas, placing it in the top half of facilities statewide, and it is the only option in Hempstead County. The facility's performance is improving, with reported issues decreasing from 7 in 2024 to 6 in 2025. Staffing is a noted strength here, rated 4 out of 5 stars with a turnover rate of 34%, which is significantly lower than the state average of 50%. There have been specific concerns such as a lack of proper food safety practices, like staff not washing hands before preparing food and expired items not being discarded, which could put residents at risk for foodborne illnesses. Overall, while there are positive aspects like good staffing and no fines, families should also be aware of the facility's ongoing food safety issues.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Arkansas
- #107/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 34% turnover. Near Arkansas's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 30 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Arkansas. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 22 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (34%)
14 points below Arkansas average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Arkansas average (3.1)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
12pts below Arkansas avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 22 deficiencies on record
Feb 2025
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure privacy was protected, and dignity was maintained for 1 (Resident #70) of 1 sample resident ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure gradual psychotropic (antipsychotic) dose reductions were addressed and (anti-anxiety) dose reductions (GDR...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication was properly stored to prevent unauthorized individuals from having access.
The findings include:
On 2/04/25...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility document review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure written notifi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure staff used infection control measures while providing care to 1 (Resident #70) of 1 sampled resident obse...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Residents #12 and #23) were not served dislikes in the dining area to prevent weight loss or nutritional deficits. ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure humidifier bottles and nasal cannula tubing were dated and stored in a safe and sanitary manner to prevent infection f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure intravenous medications were administered in a safe and non-contaminated manner for 1 (Resident #68) sampled resident. ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity, and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure combustible equipment was safely locked away from residents who wonder and/or self-propel throughout the facility. This failed practic...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the storage container used to store controlled medications requiring refrigeration was permanently affixed.
The findin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, investigation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that hand sanitation was performed while preparing food, that kitchen equipment was clean and properly maintained,...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
9 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure showers/bathes were consistently given to prom...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that medications were not left in (Resident #5, and R #67) who were not assessed for Self-Administration of Medication....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed for 1 (Resident #31) of 14 residents who were receiving oxygen. This failed practice had th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, and inventory review of the two medication rooms and two medication carts on 03/02/23, the facility failed to ensure medications in 2 of 3 medication carts were labeled and store...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meal trays were not left to sit out in a medication room while residents were sleeping and a new meal tray was provide...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0805
(Tag F0805)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended
to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to adhere to hygienic practices during the noon meal service on 2/27/23 at 12:30 pm by staff not sanitizing their hands between r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the refrigerator were covered, sealed, and dated to prevent the potential food borne illnesses, expired food item...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- • 34% turnover. Below Arkansas's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 22 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Heather Manor's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns HEATHER MANOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Heather Manor Staffed?
CMS rates HEATHER MANOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 34%, compared to the Arkansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Heather Manor?
State health inspectors documented 22 deficiencies at HEATHER MANOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 22 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Heather Manor?
HEATHER MANOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 128 certified beds and approximately 76 residents (about 59% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in HOPE, Arkansas.
How Does Heather Manor Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, HEATHER MANOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER's overall rating (3 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (34%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Heather Manor?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Heather Manor Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, HEATHER MANOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Heather Manor Stick Around?
HEATHER MANOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 34%, which is about average for Arkansas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Heather Manor Ever Fined?
HEATHER MANOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Heather Manor on Any Federal Watch List?
HEATHER MANOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.