THE GREEN HOUSE COTTAGES OF WENTWORTH PLACE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
The Green House Cottages of Wentworth Place has a Trust Grade of B+, which means it is above average and generally recommended for families seeking care. It ranks #42 out of 218 facilities in Arkansas, placing it in the top half, and #1 out of 3 in Columbia County, indicating it is the best option locally. However, the facility's performance is worsening, with reported issues increasing from 4 in 2023 to 8 in 2024. Staffing is a strong point, with a 5/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 31%, which is significantly lower than the state average, suggesting experienced staff who know the residents well. There have been no fines, which is a positive sign, and the facility provides more RN coverage than 82% of Arkansas facilities, ensuring better oversight of resident care. On the downside, there are some concerning incidents noted in recent inspections. For example, the facility failed to ensure that expired food items were promptly removed, which could lead to foodborne illnesses affecting many residents. Additionally, there was a failure to notify the long-term care ombudsman when residents were transferred to the hospital, which is an important communication lapse. These issues highlight areas that need improvement but do not overshadow the overall strengths of the facility.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Arkansas
- #42/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 31% turnover. Near Arkansas's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 38 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Arkansas. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 18 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (31%)
17 points below Arkansas average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
15pts below Arkansas avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 18 deficiencies on record
Sept 2024
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a physician's order for oxygen therapy for 1(Resident #212) of 3 (Resident #59, #212 and #366) sampled resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure oxygen/nebulizer tubing...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY**
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to notify and provide a c...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the lift pad was free of fraying and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the meals were prepared in a method that maintained nutritive value and taste that were acceptable to the residents to...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0805
(Tag F0805)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff and Shahbaz thoroughly ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a method that maintained the appearance, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended at the bed...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff and proper handling of filling up water bottles to prevent the potential spread of infection to other residents....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dented food cans were promptly removed/ discard...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2022
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed accurately related to smoking for 1 (Resident #43) of the 3 sampled res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was ordered and administered at the prescribed flow rate and failed to ensure nebulizer mask was stored in a c...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served in accordance wi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0805
(Tag F0805)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump-free consiste...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, failed to ensure expired food items were promptly removed /discarded on or before the expira...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0661
(Tag F0661)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a written discharge summary was completed that included a recapitulation of the resident's stay that consisted of a concise summary ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (85/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Arkansas.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- • 31% turnover. Below Arkansas's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 18 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is The Green House Cottages Of Wentworth Place's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns THE GREEN HOUSE COTTAGES OF WENTWORTH PLACE an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is The Green House Cottages Of Wentworth Place Staffed?
CMS rates THE GREEN HOUSE COTTAGES OF WENTWORTH PLACE's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 31%, compared to the Arkansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at The Green House Cottages Of Wentworth Place?
State health inspectors documented 18 deficiencies at THE GREEN HOUSE COTTAGES OF WENTWORTH PLACE during 2022 to 2024. These included: 17 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates The Green House Cottages Of Wentworth Place?
THE GREEN HOUSE COTTAGES OF WENTWORTH PLACE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SOUTHERN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 110 certified beds and approximately 105 residents (about 95% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in MAGNOLIA, Arkansas.
How Does The Green House Cottages Of Wentworth Place Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, THE GREEN HOUSE COTTAGES OF WENTWORTH PLACE's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (31%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting The Green House Cottages Of Wentworth Place?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is The Green House Cottages Of Wentworth Place Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, THE GREEN HOUSE COTTAGES OF WENTWORTH PLACE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at The Green House Cottages Of Wentworth Place Stick Around?
THE GREEN HOUSE COTTAGES OF WENTWORTH PLACE has a staff turnover rate of 31%, which is about average for Arkansas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was The Green House Cottages Of Wentworth Place Ever Fined?
THE GREEN HOUSE COTTAGES OF WENTWORTH PLACE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is The Green House Cottages Of Wentworth Place on Any Federal Watch List?
THE GREEN HOUSE COTTAGES OF WENTWORTH PLACE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.