CRESTPARK MARIANNA, L L C
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Crestpark Marianna has a Trust Grade of B+, which means it is above average and generally recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #7 out of 218 facilities in Arkansas, placing it in the top half, and is the only facility in Lee County, indicating no local competition. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 15 in 2024 to just 1 in 2025. Staffing is a strength, boasting a 4 out of 5-star rating and a low turnover rate of 27%, well below the state average. However, there are concerns raised in recent inspections; for example, expired food items were found in the kitchen, and one resident reported feeling disrespected during personal care. Additionally, privacy was not adequately maintained for another resident during care, which is a significant area for improvement. Overall, while Crestpark Marianna has strong staffing and a positive trend, families should weigh these strengths against the recent concerns noted in inspections.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Arkansas
- #7/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 27% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 21 points below Arkansas's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 29 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 19 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (27%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (27%)
21 points below Arkansas average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 19 deficiencies on record
Mar 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews and record review, it was determined the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse within 2 hours for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Residents #1, #3, and #4) residents reviewed for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
15 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. Resident #17 had a medical diagnosis of History of cerebral vascular accident with right sided weakness. The Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 12/27/23 documented the resident scored 0 (0-7 indicates se...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate diagnosis was acquired prior to inserting an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 (Resident #39) of 1 samp...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that feeding tube feeding bags were labeled, dated, and timed for 1 (Resident #17) of 3 sampled residents who received tube feedings. ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Nurses' Narcotic book was signed appropriately. The findings are:
On 03/13/2024 at 10:30 AM, the narcotic book on the 300 medicati...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Surveyor: [NAME], [NAME]
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post and make readily access...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a policy for flu and pneumococcal vaccinations for 17 of 17 residents who received the flu and/or pneumococcal vaccination...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect during incontinent care for 1 (Resident #40) of 2 sampled residents an...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
2. Resident #17 had diagnoses of Essential (primary) hypertension and a History of cerebral vascular accident with right sided weakness. The Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 12/27/23 documented a BIMS sco...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]'s door protector and Resident #34'...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0604
(Tag F0604)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from restraints for 2 of 2 sampled residents. Findings included:
Resident #17 had a medical diagno...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fingernails were clean and groomed to promote good personal hygiene and grooming for 2 (Residents #17 and #30) of 2 sa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
a. On 03/11/2024 at 01:54 PM, Resident #35 was sitting in the resident's room at a table with nail polish and nail polish remover on the table.
b. On 03/11/2024 at 01:24 PM, Resident #35 was lying in ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained to...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment was maintained. The findings are:
On 03/12/2024 at 11:26 AM, the bathroom next to the Director of Nursing (DON) off...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired food items were discarded; kitchen utensils/equipment were clean and in good condition and staff washed their hands while prep...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Assessments
(Tag F0636)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to comprehensively assess 1 resident (R #26) of the 2 sampled residents (R #26 and R #99) who have a Physician's Order for a rest...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan and reassess the effe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on Observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for three residents (Residents #17, R #32, R #37) of the forty-five r...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (88/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Arkansas.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- • 27% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 21 points below Arkansas's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • 19 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Crestpark Marianna, L L C's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns CRESTPARK MARIANNA, L L C an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Crestpark Marianna, L L C Staffed?
CMS rates CRESTPARK MARIANNA, L L C's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 27%, compared to the Arkansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Crestpark Marianna, L L C?
State health inspectors documented 19 deficiencies at CRESTPARK MARIANNA, L L C during 2023 to 2025. These included: 19 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Crestpark Marianna, L L C?
CRESTPARK MARIANNA, L L C is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CRESTPARK, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 80 certified beds and approximately 55 residents (about 69% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MARIANNA, Arkansas.
How Does Crestpark Marianna, L L C Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, CRESTPARK MARIANNA, L L C's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (27%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Crestpark Marianna, L L C?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Crestpark Marianna, L L C Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, CRESTPARK MARIANNA, L L C has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Crestpark Marianna, L L C Stick Around?
Staff at CRESTPARK MARIANNA, L L C tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 27%, the facility is 19 percentage points below the Arkansas average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.
Was Crestpark Marianna, L L C Ever Fined?
CRESTPARK MARIANNA, L L C has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Crestpark Marianna, L L C on Any Federal Watch List?
CRESTPARK MARIANNA, L L C is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.