WOODRUFF COUNTY HEALTH CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Woodruff County Health Center has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average but still has room for improvement. It ranks #138 out of 218 facilities in Arkansas, placing it in the bottom half, although it is the only option in Woodruff County. Unfortunately, the facility is experiencing a worsening trend in quality, with issues increasing from 5 in 2023 to 9 in 2024. Staffing is a strong point, with a 5-star rating and a turnover rate of only 28%, significantly lower than the state average, ensuring consistency in resident care. However, the facility has incurred $12,735 in fines, which is concerning and suggests ongoing compliance issues. Specific concerns include the failure to ensure that food was stored properly, which could lead to foodborne illnesses for the residents. Additionally, there was an incident where a resident who is blind and at risk for falls did not have their call light within reach, which could compromise their safety. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing, the facility's health inspection ratings and the trend of increasing issues are areas that families should carefully consider.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Arkansas
- #138/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 28% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 20 points below Arkansas's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $12,735 in fines. Lower than most Arkansas facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 31 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Arkansas. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 21 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
Low Staff Turnover (28%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (28%)
20 points below Arkansas average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Arkansas average (3.1)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 21 deficiencies on record
May 2024
9 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 (Resident #48) of 1 sample mix resident.
The findings are:
On 05/28/2024 at 11:06 AM, t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents individualized plan of care was revised to reflect the current needs of the resident and updated to include a chair alarm ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a catheter was hanging below the bladder for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #81).
The findings are:
A review of th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an open drink was not left within the reach of the residents on the 500 Hall.
The findings are:
On 05/30/2024 at 9:00 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure call light was kept within reach for 01 (Resident #23) of 01 sample mix residents.
The findings are:
The Minimum Data S...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with activities of daily living were regularly provided with the necessary assistanc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0687
(Tag F0687)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with foot care were regularly provided with the necessary assistance to maintain goo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that a chemical wasn't left out within the reach of the residents on the 500 Hall.
The findings are:
A review of the l...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0805
(Tag F0805)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure pureed food was processed to the correct consistency to meet the needs of 4 sampled residents who had a physician's order for a pureed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed ensure the resident and resident representative were notified in writing of the reason for the transfer/discharge to the hospital in a langua...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete a Baseline Care Plan to reflect t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed, dated, and stored properly for 2 (Residents #28, and #51) of 3 (Residents #28, #48 and #51...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0805
(Tag F0805)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump-free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the freezer, refrigerator and dry storage area were covered, sealed, and dated to minimize the potenti...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2021
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed accurate related to...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were correctly implemented for wound care for 1 (Resident #23) of 3 (Residents #23, #41, and #37) case...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff did not stand over residents while assisting with eating to promote dignity for 1 resident (Resident#51) of 6 (Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure indwelling catheter drainage bags and tubing were maintained in a position below the level of the bladder and it was se...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a tube feeding and flush were running at the rate ordered by the physician to promote proper nutrition and hydration fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered at the flow rate ordered by the physician to reduce the potential for complications for 1 (Resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner, food was dated, and stored per manufacturer's instructions to pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • 28% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 20 points below Arkansas's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • 21 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • $12,735 in fines. Above average for Arkansas. Some compliance problems on record.
About This Facility
What is Woodruff County's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns WOODRUFF COUNTY HEALTH CENTER an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Woodruff County Staffed?
CMS rates WOODRUFF COUNTY HEALTH CENTER's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 28%, compared to the Arkansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Woodruff County?
State health inspectors documented 21 deficiencies at WOODRUFF COUNTY HEALTH CENTER during 2021 to 2024. These included: 21 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Woodruff County?
WOODRUFF COUNTY HEALTH CENTER is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 120 certified beds and approximately 92 residents (about 77% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in MCCRORY, Arkansas.
How Does Woodruff County Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, WOODRUFF COUNTY HEALTH CENTER's overall rating (3 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (28%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Woodruff County?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Woodruff County Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, WOODRUFF COUNTY HEALTH CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Woodruff County Stick Around?
Staff at WOODRUFF COUNTY HEALTH CENTER tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 28%, the facility is 18 percentage points below the Arkansas average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.
Was Woodruff County Ever Fined?
WOODRUFF COUNTY HEALTH CENTER has been fined $12,735 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Arkansas average of $33,206. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Woodruff County on Any Federal Watch List?
WOODRUFF COUNTY HEALTH CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.