THE BLOSSOMS AT MOUNTAIN VIEW REHAB & NURSING CEN
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
The Blossoms at Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Center has a Trust Grade of B+, which means it is recommended and above average in quality. It ranks #37 out of 218 facilities in Arkansas, placing it in the top half, and it is the only nursing home in Stone County, indicating there are no local competitors. The facility's performance is stable, with the same number of issues reported in both 2023 and 2024. Staffing is average with a 3/5 rating and a turnover rate of 41%, which is better than the state average of 50%, suggesting that staff tend to stay longer and know the residents well. There have been no fines reported, which is a positive sign, but there are some concerning incidents. For example, a resident fell because staff did not use a mechanical lift as required during a transfer, leading to a delay in diagnosing a fracture. Additionally, the kitchen was found to have cleanliness issues that could potentially affect residents' health. Lastly, care plans for two residents were not updated to include necessary safety measures, which indicates some gaps in attention to care details. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and no fines, the facility does have areas that require improvement.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Arkansas
- #37/218
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 41% turnover. Near Arkansas's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 21 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (41%)
7 points below Arkansas average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Arkansas avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record
Sept 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with activities of daily living were regularly provided with the necessary assistance...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised with interventions to provide proper care to 2 of (Residents #51 and #57) of 2 sampled residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure catheter output bags were concealed in a privacy bag to protect the resident's dignity for 1 (Resident #277) of 1 sampled ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician was notified of a downward trend weight loss for interventions to be implemented for 1 (Resident #47) of 1 sampled res...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2022
10 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a mechanical lift was used to complete a transfer according ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were placed in easy reach for resident's use to call for assistance for 3 (Resident #4, #16 and #63) sampl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was promptly notified of a fall so necessary t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0694
(Tag F0694)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained when administering IV medication for 1 (Resident #66) of 1 sampled resident who received ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the gradual psychotropic dose reductions (GDR) were attempted in the absence of a physician's documented evaluati...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served in accordance with the planned, written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were prepared by methods that conserved their nutritional value, flavor, and appearance, to maintain good nu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control procedures were followed during medication pass to prevent the possible spread of infection as...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the kitchen floor was clean, dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment and food items, leftover food items...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0577
(Tag F0577)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview, the facility failed to ensure the results of the most recent survey was readily accessible for residents, family members, and representatives of residents. This failed practice had...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (80/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Arkansas.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- • 41% turnover. Below Arkansas's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 14 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns THE BLOSSOMS AT MOUNTAIN VIEW REHAB & NURSING CEN an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen Staffed?
CMS rates THE BLOSSOMS AT MOUNTAIN VIEW REHAB & NURSING CEN's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 41%, compared to the Arkansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen?
State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at THE BLOSSOMS AT MOUNTAIN VIEW REHAB & NURSING CEN during 2022 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm, 12 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen?
THE BLOSSOMS AT MOUNTAIN VIEW REHAB & NURSING CEN is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by THE BLOSSOMS NURSING AND REHAB CENTER, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 97 certified beds and approximately 68 residents (about 70% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MOUNTAIN VIEW, Arkansas.
How Does The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, THE BLOSSOMS AT MOUNTAIN VIEW REHAB & NURSING CEN's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (41%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, THE BLOSSOMS AT MOUNTAIN VIEW REHAB & NURSING CEN has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen Stick Around?
THE BLOSSOMS AT MOUNTAIN VIEW REHAB & NURSING CEN has a staff turnover rate of 41%, which is about average for Arkansas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen Ever Fined?
THE BLOSSOMS AT MOUNTAIN VIEW REHAB & NURSING CEN has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen on Any Federal Watch List?
THE BLOSSOMS AT MOUNTAIN VIEW REHAB & NURSING CEN is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.