THE BLOSSOMS AT MOUNTAIN VIEW REHAB & NURSING CEN

706 OAK GROVE ST, MOUNTAIN VIEW, AR 72560 (870) 269-5835
For profit - Corporation 97 Beds THE BLOSSOMS NURSING AND REHAB CENTER Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
80/100
#37 of 218 in AR
Last Inspection: September 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

The Blossoms at Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Center has a Trust Grade of B+, which means it is recommended and above average in quality. It ranks #37 out of 218 facilities in Arkansas, placing it in the top half, and it is the only nursing home in Stone County, indicating there are no local competitors. The facility's performance is stable, with the same number of issues reported in both 2023 and 2024. Staffing is average with a 3/5 rating and a turnover rate of 41%, which is better than the state average of 50%, suggesting that staff tend to stay longer and know the residents well. There have been no fines reported, which is a positive sign, but there are some concerning incidents. For example, a resident fell because staff did not use a mechanical lift as required during a transfer, leading to a delay in diagnosing a fracture. Additionally, the kitchen was found to have cleanliness issues that could potentially affect residents' health. Lastly, care plans for two residents were not updated to include necessary safety measures, which indicates some gaps in attention to care details. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and no fines, the facility does have areas that require improvement.

Trust Score
B+
80/100
In Arkansas
#37/218
Top 16%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Holding Steady
2 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
41% turnover. Near Arkansas's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 21 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 2 issues
2024: 2 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (41%)

    7 points below Arkansas average of 48%

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 41%

Near Arkansas avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Chain: THE BLOSSOMS NURSING AND REHAB CENT

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record

1 actual harm
Sept 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with activities of daily living were regularly provided with the necessary assistance...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with activities of daily living were regularly provided with the necessary assistance to maintain good hygiene and grooming for one (Resident #12) of one resident sampled for activities of daily living. These are the findings: A review of the Order Summary revealed Resident #12 had diagnoses of type 2 diabetes, generalized anxiety disorder, depression, and chronic kidney disease. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 06/21/2024 of revealed Resident #12 scored a 15 (cognitively intact) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). A review of the Care Plan revealed Resident #12 had an activity of daily living care deficit and required limited assistance of one staff with bathing. On 09/09/2024 at 11:58 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #12 up in a wheelchair with facial hair stubble on the right side of chin. Resident #12 felt of the stubble and stated they would like to be shaved as it is embarrassing. The resident stated it had been over a week from the last time they were shaved. Resident #12 then showed the surveyor their fingernails and stated it had been three weeks since they have been trimmed or painted. The Surveyor observed Resident #12's fingernails were long, with a dark brown substance under all ten of them, and that the nail polish was mostly gone. Resident #12 stated that they would like to have their fingernails trimmed and cleaned. On 09/10/2024 at 9:20 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #12 up in a wheelchair, the resident had not been shaved and/or fingernail care provided. On 09/10/2024 at 2:20 PM, the Surveyor observed Resident #12 up in a wheelchair, the resident had not been shaved and/or fingernail care provided. On 09/11/2024 at 11:06 AM, during an interview Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 described Resident #12's fingernails as long, dirty underneath, chipped and that the resident is a diabetic, so the nurse would do nail care. CNA #3 then described Resident #12's facial hair as stubble and that the resident needed to be shaved. CNA #3 stated that nailcare and shaving should be done on bath days and as needed. CNA #3 stated it is important to do nail care and shaving to ensure the residents feel good, and they look put together. She then stated that residents do not want to eat with nasty nails, they want to keep them maintained and trimmed. On 09/12/2024 at 9:00 AM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) she stated nail care and shaving is important to keep their nails short so they do not injure themselves and shaving so they are not all grown out. Then stated that both should be done on bath days and as needed. A review of a facility policy titled, Care of Fingernails/Toenails, Revised October 2010, stated, The purpose of this procedure are to clean the nail bed to keep nails trimmed and to prevent infections. A review of a facility policy titled, Shaving the Resident, revised on October 2010, stated, The purpose of this procedure is to promote cleanliness and to provide skin care.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised with interventions to provide proper care to 2 of (Residents #51 and #57) of 2 sampled residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised with interventions to provide proper care to 2 of (Residents #51 and #57) of 2 sampled residents. These are our findings: A review of the Order Summary revealed Resident #51 had diagnoses of stroke, dementia, history of falling, and anxiety disorder. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/17/2024 revealed Resident #57 scored an 8 (8 to 12 indicates moderate cognitive impairment) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). A review of the Care Plan revealed that interventions for pressure reducing devices and fall mats were not added to the care plan. On 09/09/24 at 11:09 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #51 in bed with quarter side rails up, an air mattress, and a fall mat in place on the right side of the bed with the left side up against the wall. On 09/10/24 at 01:57 PM, the Surveyor observed Resident #51 in bed with quarter side rails up, an air mattress, and a fall mat in place on the right side of the bed with the left side up against the wall. 2. A review of the Order Summary revealed Resident #57 had diagnoses of dementia, anxiety disorder, stroke, and Alzheimer's. A review of the Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 06/21/2024 revealed Resident #57 scored a 3 (severe cognitive impairment) on the BIMS. A review of the Care Plan reveal interventions for pressure reducing devices, half side rails, or a foot cradle were not added to the care plan. On 09/09/2024 at 11:41 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #57 on an air mattress bed, half side rails up, and a foot cradle was in place at the end of the bed. On 09/10/2024 at 9:04 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #57 on an air mattress bed, half side rails up, and a foot cradle was in place at the end of the bed. On 09/11/2024 at 11:06 AM, during an interview Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 stated she is familiar with the residents on the 300 Hall and started out as a housekeeper about 3 years ago. CNA #3 stated that Resident #51 has had the interventions since admission in July. CNA #3 then stated that Resident #57 had the interventions of a foot cradle, side rails, and pressure reducing devices for as long as she could remember. On 09/11/2024 at 11:16 AM, during an interview the MDS Coordinator confirmed the interventions for Resident #51 and Resident #57 were not on the care plan, then stated that it is important to revise a care plan as they change all the time and to have the staff know how to take care of the residents. On 09/12/2024 at 9:00 AM, during an interview the Director of Nursing (DON) stated it is important to revise a care plan, just to keep the most accurate information on the residents up to date, so you can provide the correct care for them. A review of the facility policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised on December 2016, stated, A comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident.
Jul 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure catheter output bags were concealed in a privacy bag to protect the resident's dignity for 1 (Resident #277) of 1 sampled ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure catheter output bags were concealed in a privacy bag to protect the resident's dignity for 1 (Resident #277) of 1 sampled resident who had an indwelling catheter. The findings are: 1. On 07/03/23 at 11:19 AM, Resident #277 was lying in bed with a catheter bag attached to bottom rail of bed 1/4 full of yellow liquid. The bag was sitting on the floor, facing the door visible from the doorway and to visitors. A blue privacy bag was on the floor behind the catheter bag. a. The Care Plan with an initiated date of 06/27/23 documented, .Catheter: The resident has 16 FR [french] indwelling catheter. Position catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder and away from entrance room door . The Care Plan did not address the use of a privacy bag. b. The Physicians Orders dated 06/26/23 documented, Foley Catheter Size: 16fr 10cc balloon . Foley Catheter Care every shift. two times a day . 2. On 07/05/23 at 10:20 AM, Resident #277 was lying in bed with a catheter bag hanging on a bed rail 1/2 full of yellow liquid, facing the door, visible from the doorway and to visitors. A privacy bag was lying partially on the floor hanging by one strap under the bed. The Surveyor asked Resident #277 if it bothered her that her catheter bag was showing. Resident #277 stated, I thought it was covered. 3. On 07/05/23 at 10:24 AM, the Surveyor asked Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 when catheters were checked. LPN #1 stated, Every shift CNAs [Certified Nursing Assistants] check them and report to the nurses. Oh my, yes it should be covered. LPN #1 apologized to Resident #277 that the catheter was not covered and stated a staff person would come back and put it in a bag. The Surveyor asked LPN #1 if there were any negative outcomes for the catheter bag not being covered. LPN #1 stated, It could embarrass them. 4. On 07/05/23 at 11:23 AM, the Surveyor asked the Director of Nursing (DON) how a catheter bag should be positioned and the negative outcomes if it was not. The DON stated, Below the bladder, with the hook hanging on the bed frame, and in a privacy bag. If it's not covered, it can cause back flow or infection. It's also a dignity issue. 5. The facility policy titled Resident Dignity, provided by the DON on 07/05/23 at 12:18 PM documented, .Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality .Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity is prohibited. Staff shall promote dignity and assist residents as needed by: e. Helping the resident to keep urinary catheter bags covered .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician was notified of a downward trend weight loss for interventions to be implemented for 1 (Resident #47) of 1 sampled res...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician was notified of a downward trend weight loss for interventions to be implemented for 1 (Resident #47) of 1 sampled resident who had a weight loss of 5% (percent) or greater in 30 days. The findings are: 1. Resident #47's Care Plan with an initiated date of 04/06/22 documented, .Goal Promote my nutritional intake necessary to maintain or improve current weight . Notify my MD [Medical Director], DON [Director of Nursing] & [and] DSM [Dietary Service Manager] of any changes in weight of 5% more or less . 2. The electronic health records documented Resident #47 weighed 150.0 pounds (lbs.) on 05/23/23 and weighed 142.0 lbs. on 06/27/23 a -5.33% weight loss in 30 days. 3. The Progress Notes dated 6/27/2023 at 1:37 PM noted a weight warning of 5% loss over 30 days. 4. On 07/04/23 at 3:58 PM, the Surveyor asked the DON when the Physician was to be notified of a resident's significant weight loss. The DON stated, I just notified him today. I am trying to get the weights caught up. I was behind. 5. On 07/05/23 at 11:23 AM, the Surveyor asked the DON when the Physician was notified regarding a resident's weight loss and what outcomes could occur if the physician was not notified. The DON stated, I was just working on that yesterday. I've only done this a month and was behind. I am waiting on responses from the doctor. The resident could have continued weight loss. The Surveyor asked the DON how she was notified of the weight loss. The DON stated, No one tells me. I have to look them up and run a report. [Resident #47] should have been done. [Resident #47' s] weight warnings show 5.3%. Looks like I missed [Resident #47]. I just didn't do it. I skipped [Resident #47]. [Resident #47] interventions are blank. I will do that today. The Surveyor asked the DON if the Registered Dietician (RD) saw Resident #47 and recommended changes. The DON stated, The RD informs me by email. I just took over this part too, so I am depending on someone else's filing. [Resident #47] was reviewed May11th but that was before [Resident #47] had over a 5% weight loss, so I do not see any new recommendations. 6. The facility policy titled, Resident Weights, provided by the DON on 07/05/23 at 12:18 PM documented, .3. Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken. If the weight is verified, nursing will notify the dietitian. Dietitian will review the resident's EMR [electronic medical record] to determine the root cause for the resident's weight loss. In addition, the dietitian will work with the multidisciplinary team on a plan to address weight loss .4 .Negative trends will be evaluated by the treatment team whether the criteria for significant weight change has been met .5 .interventions should be considered by the IDT to prevent further trends downward .
Apr 2022 10 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a mechanical lift was used to complete a transfer according ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a mechanical lift was used to complete a transfer according to the plan of care resulting in a fall, on-coming staff and the physician were informed of the fall, and thorough assessments were completed when the resident continued to complain of pain resulting in the delay in diagnosis and treatment of a fracture for 1 (Resident #73) of 1 resident who had a fall. These failed practices resulted in actual harm to Resident #73, who had a fall due to staff not using a mechanical lift during a transfer. The findings are: Resident #73 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses of Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Aphasia, Apraxia, Anxiety Disorder, Depression, Sleep Apnea, and Seizures. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/05/2022 documented the resident was moderately impaired in daily decision making per a Staff Assessment for Mental Status required extensive assistance with two staff for bed mobility and transfers, and extensive assistance with one staff for dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. a. The care plan documented, Focus I require extensive assist x [times] 2 staff with . transfers . Date Initiated: 2/22/22 . Interventions . I require assist x 2 staff and a mechanical lift with all transfers . Date initiated 2/22/22 . b. A document titled #2379 Fall documented, .[Resident #73] Incident Location: Resident's room . Nursing Description: CNAs [Certified Nursing Assistants] reported to this LPN [Licensed Practical Nurse] that as resident was put back in bed she began falling and was lowered to the floor by CNAs. She was then assisted to the bed prior to the LPN assessing the resident. She was c/o [complained of] right lower extremity pain at the time. She was pointing at her ankle and foot. Resident Description: I started falling and they lowered me to the floor . Description: Assessment done. Remind staff to be conscious of their ability to lift. Resident taken to hospital: N [No] . Injury Location: Right lower leg (front) . Predisposing Situation Factors: Incident during staff assist transfer to/from chair . Agencies/People Notified .Physician/Extender [Doctor] 03/08/2022 1513 [3:13 p.m.] Resident Representative [Husband] 03/08/2022 1513 . c. A Nurse's Note dated 03/06/2022 at 9:45 pm documented, .Previous shift stated resident had increased anxiety and pain since the tornado warning, resident screaming, inconsolable. Scheduled pain pill given and PRN [as needed] Flexeril. No change in resident, resident repositioned. Resident continues screaming. Called [doctor], ordered one-time extra dose of resident's prn pain medication, Tylenol with codeine. Resident lying in bed with head elevated. d. A Nursing Note dated 03/09/2022 at 6:23 pm for 03/07/22 at 08:30 am documented, Late entry: Note text: Called [Doctor] office approximately 0830 regarding resident who was calling out in pain rated 10/10. Left message explaining condition of resident and her requiring additional medication for pain and severe anxiety. [Doctor] returned my call approximately 15 minutes later and discussed status of the resident. [Doctor] could hear the resident yelling out while on the phone with me. [Doctor] ordered blood work, stat [immediate] medication which was ordered and additional PRN medication. [Husband] was notified and he came to the facility within 1-2 hours which helped relax his wife for a short period of time. Medication was dispensed and resident was closely monitored. e. An Incident note dated 03/08/2022 at 3:14 pm, documented, CNAs reported to this LPN that as resident was put back in bed she began falling and was lowered to the floor by the CNA's. She was then assisted to the bed by use of a Hoyer lift prior to this LPN assessing resident. She was c/o (complaining of) right lower extremity pain at the time. She was pointing towards her ankle and foot. Attempted to rub resident's lower extremity to reduce pain. Resident had stated it felt better at the time. f. An Activity Note 3/8/2022 at 3:48 p.m. documented, Note text: Order Received from [physician] to send Resident To ER to have Right Leg Pain Eval. g. An Injury of Unknown Origin Incident and Accident report date 03/08/2022 at 3:18 pm documented, .Resident had complaint of pain to right leg. Order obtained for x-ray of RLE [right lower extremity] where it was noted that there was a fracture of the right femur .Resident transferred to hospital for x-ray .swelling right knee front . h. The hospital Discharge Summary documented the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 3/15/2022. The diagnosis was right distal femur fracture. History of Present Illness: [Resident #73] is a [AGE] year old female patient . presented after She had a fall Sunday [3/6/2022] night at the nursing home, unable to rate her pain. She is unable to communicate fully due to prior stroke. Per her husband, during a tornado approaching on Sunday, 2 days prior to admission, she was being moved due to the inclement weather. After the storm had passed, they were trying to move her back to her bed in her room and apparently she slipped while placing her in a wheelchair injuring her right leg . Hospital Course: [Resident #73] admitted to the hospital for right shaft femur fracture . Ortho [orthopedics] was consulted for further recs [recommendations]. She has placed retrograde femoral nail on 3/11/2022 . i. The Facility Investigation Report for Resident Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property and Exploitation of Residents in Long Term Care Facilities documented, .Date and Time of Discovery 3/8/2022 Time: 8:00 P.M . [Resident #73] was having continued pain in her right leg; she was sent to the ER [emergency room] for further evaluation. Upon x-ray it was noted resident had a right femur fracture and right fibula fracture. A report was completed for an injury of unknown origin . On 3/6/22 [Resident #73] was assisted to floor by staff. Resident assessed by nurse with no change noted to baseline. From the date of 3/6/22 to 3/8/22 no change was noted to her baseline with no bruising noted. Based on the facts and information gathered we are unable to identify when or how the injury occurred . Findings and Actions Taken . Inservice completed for abuse and neglect . j. On 04/11/2022 at 02:33 PM, the husband was asked about notifications during the representative interview. He stated, They did not tell me she fell. I found out when I visited the next day [03/07/22] and she was hurting, and I questioned her. I got it out of her that they dropped her. She understands everything but just can't articulate. They didn't do anything about it for two days. They questioned the nurse about it to come in and write a statement and I haven't seen that nurse since. He was asked if he had let the nurse know. He stated, Yeah I went out and asked the nurse about them dropping her on the floor. She said she didn't know anything about it. And I went the next day because she was still hurting, and that nurse said that maybe she needs to go to the hospital. k. On 4/12/2022 at 2:20 pm [Doctor] was asked if he was aware of the fall on 3/6/22. He stated, No I was not informed until 3/8/22. He was asked about her general condition. He stated, She has had a CVA, [Cerebrovascular Accident] and she gets frustrated easily because she's hard to understand. She's really sensitive to pain. I came over to see her when she came back because I wanted to see her wound. But I will say she has big legs, and it would be hard to be able to see if something was wrong with it or not, any deformity. l. On 04/12/2022 at 2:46 pm, CNA #3 was asked about what happened with the resident on 3/6/22. He stated, [Resident #73] was hollering more than usual. I didn't notice anything unusual with her leg, no swelling or redness. I just thought she hadn't had her pain medicine yet. He was asked, Did you report to the nurse? He stated, Yeah, we asked the nurse what was going on and she just said they had a storm last night and they thought that made her more anxious. m. On 04/12/2022 at 2:55 pm, CNA #4 was asked, Did you notice anything unusual about [Resident #73] on 3/7/22 when you worked? She stated, Well she's always been a screamer and that day she was screaming more than usual. She was asked, Did you notice anything unusual with her leg? She stated, No. She was asked, Did you report her increased screaming to the nurse? She stated, Yes. She was asked, What nurse? She stated, I don't remember.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were placed in easy reach for resident's use to call for assistance for 3 (Resident #4, #16 and #63) sampl...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were placed in easy reach for resident's use to call for assistance for 3 (Resident #4, #16 and #63) sampled residents who used their call light to call for assistance. This failed practice had the potential to affect 28 residents who resided on 100 and 200 halls as documented on the facility Census and Condition provided by the Administrator on 04/11/2022. The findings are: 1. Resident #4 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Hypothyroidism, and Hypertension. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/08/2022 documented the resident scored 3 (0-7 indicates severe impairment) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS); required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene; and limited assistance of one person with ambulating. a. A care plan with a review start date of 1/25/2022 documented .Resident is a risk for falls related to poor safety awareness, unsteady gait, .use of pain medications .keep call light within reach . b. On 04/12/2022 at 9:00 am, Resident #4 was in bed asleep without a call light in sight. c. On 04/12/2022 at 9:06 am Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 was asked, Does she have a call light in her room? She stated, She should have. CNA #2 looked around the room and found her call light wrapped around the call light box, which was behind two gowns hanging on the wall. d. On 04/12/2022 at 9:07 am, CNA #2 was asked, Should she have her call light in reach? She stated, Yes. 2. Resident #16 had diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction with Hemiparesis and Hemiplegia, Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood, Dysarthria, Anarthria, and Dysphagia. An admission MDS with an ARD of 01/17/2022 documented the resident scored 9 (8-12 indicates moderate impairment) on a BIMS and required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. a. A care plan with a review start date of 02/04/2022 documents .The resident is moderate risk for falls related to gait/balance problems .Be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. The resident needs prompt response to all requests for assistance . b. On 04/11/2022 at 1:06pm, CNAs #2 and #3 assisted in putting resident in bed and left the room, leaving her call light draped over the call light box on the wall out of reach. The resident was asked, Do they forget to give you your call light often? She shrugged then stated, Your guess is as good as mine, but I don't call them unless I really need something though. I don't call them just to bug them. c. On 04/11/2022 at 1:30 pm, CNA #6 was asked, Are call lights supposed to be in reach of the residents at all times? She stated, Yes. 3. Resident #63 had diagnoses of Disruptive Mood Disorder, Alzheimer's Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 4, Nausea, Disorientation and Hearing Loss. A Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/25/2022 documented the resident scored 8 (8-12 indicated moderate impairment) on a BIMS; required limited assistance by one person for bed mobility and toileting; and supervision for transfers, dressing, personal hygiene and ambulation. a. A care plan with a review start date of 01/14/2022 documents .The resident is risk for falls related to confusion, gait/balance problems, unaware of safety needs .Be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage resident to use it for assistance as needed. The resident needs prompt response to all requests for assistance . b. On 04/12/2022 at 2:24pm, resident was sitting in a recliner with call light draped across the bedside table halfway across the room out of resident's reach. She was asked, Do they forget to give you your call light often? She nodded yes and stated, I have to get up on my own and hold on to objects myself and do things myself. I don't like this place. 4. A facility policy titled Answering the Call Light received from the administrator on 4/14/2022 at 9:32am documented, .When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident . 5. On 04/14/2022 at 11:10 am, the Director of Nurses (DON) was asked, Should call lights be in reach of residents? She stated, Yes. She was asked, At all times? She stated, Yes.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was promptly notified of a fall so necessary t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was promptly notified of a fall so necessary treatment could be initiated and the resident's responsible party immediately notified of a fall to allow the responsible party an opportunity to provide input on care decisions for 1 (Resident #73) of 1 resident who had a fall. The findings are: Resident #73 had diagnoses of Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Aphasia, Apraxia, Anxiety Disorder, Sleep Apnea, and Seizures. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/05/2022 documented the resident was moderately impaired in daily decision making per a Staff Assessment for Mental Status required extensive assistance with two staff for bed mobility and transfers, and extensive assistance with one staff for dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. a. The care plan documented, Focus I require extensive assist x [times] 2 staff with . transfers . Date Initiated: 2/22/22 . Interventions . I require assist x 2 staff and a mechanical lift with all transfers . Date initiated 2/22/22 . b. A document titled #2379 Fall documented, .[Resident #73] Incident Location: Resident's room . Nursing Description: CNAs [Certified Nursing Assistants] reported to this LPN [Licensed Practical Nurse] that as resident was put back in bed she began falling and was lowered to the floor by CNAs. She was then assisted to the bed prior to the LPN assessing the resident. She was c/o [complained of] right lower extremity pain at the time. She was pointing at her ankle and foot. Resident Description: I started falling and they lowered me to the floor . Description: Assessment done. Remind staff to be conscious of their ability to lift. Resident taken to hospital: N [No] . Injury Location: Right lower leg (front) . Predisposing Situation Factors: . Incident during staff assist transfer to/from chair . Agencies/People Notified .Physician/Extender [Doctor] 03/08/2022 1513 [3:13 p.m.] Resident Representative [Husband] 03/08/2022 1513 . c. A Nurse's Note dated 03/06/2022 at 9:45 pm documented, .Previous shift stated resident had increased anxiety and pain since the tornado warning, resident screaming, inconsolable. Scheduled pain pill given and PRN [as needed] Flexeril. No change in resident, resident repositioned. Resident continues screaming. Called Dr. [name], ordered one-time extra dose of resident's prn pain medication, Tylenol with codeine. Resident lying in bed with head elevated. d. A Nursing Note dated 03/09/2022 at 6:23 pm for 03/07/22 at 08:30 am documented, Late entry: Note text: Called [Doctor] office approximately 0830 regarding resident who was calling out in pain rated 10/10. Left message explaining condition of resident and her requiring additional medication for pain and severe anxiety. [Doctor] returned my call approximately 15 minutes later and discussed status of the resident. [Doctor] could hear the resident yelling out while on the phone with me. [Doctor] ordered blood work, stat [immediate] medication which was ordered and additional PRN medication. [Husband] was notified and he came to the facility within 1-2 hours which helped relax his wife for a short period of time. Medication was dispensed and resident was closely monitored. e. On 04/11/2022 at 02:33 PM, the husband was asked about notifications during the representative interview. He stated, They did not tell me she fell. I found out when I visited the next day (03/07/22) and she was hurting, and I questioned her. I got it out of her that they dropped her. She understands everything but just can't articulate. They didn't do anything about it for two days. They questioned the nurse about it to come in and write a statement and I haven't seen that nurse since. He was asked if he had let the nurse know. He stated, Yeah I went out and asked the nurse about them dropping her on the floor. She said she didn't know anything about it. And I went the next day because she was still hurting, and that nurse said that maybe she needs to go to the hospital. f. On 4/12/2022 at 2:20 pm [Doctor] was asked if he was aware of the fall on 3/6/22. He stated, No I was not informed until 3/8/22. He was asked about her general condition. He stated, She has had a CVA, [Cerebrovascular Accident] and she gets frustrated easily because she's hard to understand. She's really sensitive to pain. I came over to see her when she came back because I wanted to see her wound. But I will say she has big legs, and it would be hard to be able to see if something was wrong with it or not, any deformity. g. A facility policy Change of Condition-Clinical Protocol received from the Administrator on 4/14/2022 documented, During the initial assessment, the Physician will help identify individuals with a significant risk for having acute changes of condition during their stay . 7. For emergencies, they will call or page the Physician and request a prompt response (within approximately one-half hour or less) . The nursing staff will contact the physician based on the urgency of the situation. The Nurse and Physician will discuss and evaluate the situation
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0694 (Tag F0694)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained when administering IV medication for 1 (Resident #66) of 1 sampled resident who received ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained when administering IV medication for 1 (Resident #66) of 1 sampled resident who received IV medication. The findings are: Resident 66 had diagnoses of Coronary Artery Disease and Pneumonia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 03/29/22 documented the resident scored 8 (8-12 indicates moderately impaired) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status. 1. On 04/12/22 at 07:55 AM, the Morning med pass on 400 Hall. LPN #1 had mask below nose and was walking down the hallway. She went to medication (med) room, and picked up several IV medication bags, a box of saline flushes, opened it and a package of tubing and went back to the med cart and prepared IV (Intravenous) medication. She then entered the resident's room and attached the tubing to the resident's saline lock without wearing any gloves. a) On 04/12/22 at 08:14 AM, LPN #1 was asked, Do you change the tubing every time? She stated, Well we usually change it out every 12 hours. She was asked, Do you usually label the tubing? She stated, Um, yeah, I probably didn't last night. Then she got a label for the tubing. She was asked, Do you see a date/time on that piggyback or tubing? She stated, No but that was the night nurse. b) She was asked, Should you be doing hand hygiene between setting up residents medicine? She stated, Yeah. She was asked, Did you do that after you gave his IV med and before setting up another resident's medication? She stated, Nope but I have some (hand sanitizer) right here. She was asked, Should you have worn gloves when setting up the IV? She stated, Yes. She was asked, Why is that important? She stated, For infection control. c) On 04/14/22 at 011:30 AM, the Director of Nurses (DON) was asked, Should a nurse do hand hygiene before and after giving resident's their medication? She stated, Yes. She was asked, Should IV tubing and bags be labelled? She stated, Yes. She was asked, Why is that important? She stated, For infection control.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the gradual psychotropic dose reductions (GDR) were attempted in the absence of a physician's documented evaluati...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the gradual psychotropic dose reductions (GDR) were attempted in the absence of a physician's documented evaluation of the specific risks versus benefits of continuing the medication, and a documented explanation as to why a dose reduction attempt would be contraindicated in order to ascertain the smallest effective dose and minimize the potential for adverse drug effects for 1 (Residents #72) of 3 (Residents #17, #21 and #72 ) sampled residents who received psychotropic medications. The facility failed to ensure that residents with PRN [as needed] medication were monitored, and that the physician documented need for medication every 14 days for 1 (Resident #72) of 1 sample mix resident who had orders for PRN psychotropic medications. This failed practice had the potential the x residents who received psychotropic medications, according to the list provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 4/15/22 at 8:58 AM. Resident # 72 had diagnosis of unspecified Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Alzheimer's Disease. The Annual Minimum Data with an Assessment Reference Date 0f 4/01/22 documented the resident scored 1 (0-7 indicates severe cognitive impairment) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status, had short and long-term memory problem, had no indicators of psychosis or behaviors, and received an antianxiety and antipsychotic during the last 7 days. a. The Care Plan dated 9/19/18 documented, .Discuss with MD [Medical Doctor], and with the family regarding an on-going need for use of medication. Review behaviors/interventions and alternate therapies attempted and their effectiveness as per facility police .monitor/record occurrence for target behavior . b. A Physician's order dated 8/23/19 documented, .Xanax Tablet 0.5 MG [milligrams] Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed prior to showers . Diagnosis . anxiety . c. A Physician's Order dated 9/1/20 documented, .Seroquel Tablet Give 225 mg by mouth one time a day . Diagnosis . unspecified Dementia with Behavioral disturbance . d. A Physician's order dated, . 2/16/22 Buspirone HCl [hydrochloride] Tablet 15 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth three times a day . Diagnosis . anxiety . f. On 4/14/22 at 8:38 AM, the Administrator was asked to provide the GDR for psychotropic medications. g. On 4/14/22 at 11:45 AM, the Director or Nursing was asked to provide the GDR for psychotropic medications. h. On 04/14/22 02:12 PM, the DON and Administrator was asked, Do you have any documentation that shows why this resident was started back on Buspirone? They stated, No, They were asked, Do you have any documentation from the physician every 14 days for the PRN medication? They stated, No. i. On 4/14/22 at 2:43 PM, received the Assessment and Evaluation dated 2/25/22 which documented the Resident's diagnosis as Alzheimer's and Dementia with Behaviors. This Physician document did not address the use of psychotropic medications. j. The latest behavior notes documented, On 1/2/22 at 6:13 AM., .Resident hitting and kicking staff during rounds stated that her arms hurt, arms winging (flailing) contact with staff, no one holding her just blocking hits . k. Facility Policy Antipsychotic Medication Use documented, .The attending Physician and other staff will gather and document information to clarify a resident's behavior, mood, function, medical condition, specific symptoms, and risks to the residents and others . l. Facility Policy Antipsychotic Medication Use documented, .The staff will observe, document, and report to the Attending Physician information regarding the effectiveness of any interventions, including antipsychotic medications .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served in accordance with the planned, written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served in accordance with the planned, written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 1 of 2 meals observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 6 residents who received pureed diets, according to a List provided by the Dietary Employee on 4/11/2022. The findings are: 1. On Monday 4/11/2022, the facility extended its lunch menu to document that the residents on pureed diets were to receive 8 ounces of pureed lasagna. 2. On 4/11/2022 at10:59 AM, Dietary Employee #2 used #8 scoop which is equivalent to a 4 ounce serving, which was a single portion of pureed lasagna to the residents on pureed diets. The menu specified for the residents on pureed diets to receive 8 ounces of pureed lasagna. 3. On 4/11/2022 11:54 AM, Dietary Employee #2 was asked, What scoop size did you use to serve pureed lasagna? She stated, I used #8 scoop. She was asked, How much meat each resident on pureed diets received? he stated, I gave one scoop to each resident. She was asked, How many servings of pureed meat was left in the pan? She stated, It was 3 servings left in the pan. She was asked, How many residents do you have on pureed diets? She stated, We have 8 residents, but I did 9 servings of pureed 4. On 4/11/2022 at 12:26 PM, Dietary Employee #2 stated, We ran out of lasagna. We have 7 more residents to serve. At 12:50 PM, 7 residents were served diced potatoes and meatballs.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were prepared by methods that conserved their nutritional value, flavor, and appearance, to maintain good nu...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were prepared by methods that conserved their nutritional value, flavor, and appearance, to maintain good nutritional intake and enhance the dining experience for 1 of 1 meal observed. The findings are: 1. On 4/11/2022 at 12:25 PM, the residents received dried and crusted lasagna. 2. Resident #34 had a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/18/2022 documented the resident scored 15 indicates cognitively intact on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). And independent for eating with set help only. On 4/11/2022 At 12:55 PM, resident was asked if the food was good? He stated, No, I can't eat that lasagna. When asked why he stated, The noodles are over cooked and rubbery. They don't know how to cook here. 3. Resident #8 had Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 1/18/2022 documented the resident scored 14 indicates cognitively intact on the BIM. On 4/11/2022 at 1:02 PM, Resident #8 raised her lunch plate covering and stated, No, I am not eating that you taste of it. All of the food here doesn't taste good. 4. Resident #5 had Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 1/11/2022. a. On 4/11/2022 at 1:05 PM Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) brought food tray to the resident's room. The CNA then took the tray back to the kitchen, and then returned the tray back to the resident's room. He was asked why he removed the top layer of the lasagna. He said it was due to being too hard to cut up. b. On 4/11/2022 at 1:16 PM, an unfinished plate of lasagna was sitting on Resident #5's bedside table. She was asked if she enjoyed her lasagna. She pointed at it and stated, None of their food is good. I couldn't eat that. 5. On 4/11/2022 1:07 PM, Dietary Employee #2 was asked to describe the appearance of the lasagna that was served to the residents. She stated, It was tough.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control procedures were followed during medication pass to prevent the possible spread of infection as...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control procedures were followed during medication pass to prevent the possible spread of infection as evidenced by not performing hand hygiene between each resident during medication pass, and not keeping mask up above nose. Failed to ensure that they maintained proper infection control measures by using the CDC (Center for Disease Control) recommended personal protective equipment (PPE), which included eye protection when collecting a COVID-19 specimen for testing and failed to ensure that proper PPE was donned prior to entering a room for 1 (R#176) of 3 (R#176, R#224, and R#17) sampled case mix that were on Transmission Based Precautions. The findings are: 1. On 04/12/22 at 07:55 AM, the Morning med pass on 400 Hall. LPN #1 had mask below nose and was walking down the hallway. She continued walking until she was asked to put her mask up above her nose. LPN #1 delivered a breakfast tray to a resident then proceeded to set up medication for a resident without hand hygiene. She brought medication in for a resident, put a liquid medication on the resident's overbed tray, assist him with drinking with a straw, but the resident refused. LPN #1 picked up the medication cup and came back to the medication cart, set the liquid medication on the cart, stated, I've never had a resident refuse liquid meds [medication] so I don't know what to do with it. She was asked, Should you be doing hand hygiene between setting up residents medicine? She stated, Yeah. a. On 04/14/22 at 011:30 AM, the Director of Nurses (DON) was asked, Should a nurse do hand hygiene before and after giving resident's their medication? She stated, Yes. b. A facility policy received from the Administrator on 04/14/2022 titled Administering Medications documents .22. Staff shall follow established facility infection control procedures (e.9., handwashing, antiseptic technique, gloves, isolation precautions, etc.) for the administration of medications, as applicable . Resident #176 had diagnoses of Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Delusional Disorder, and Unspecified Dementia. The admission Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 4.5.22 documented the resident scored 3 (severe cognitive impact) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status; Independent with indoor mobility(ambulation). The resident's initial care plan did not address her quarantined status. a. A physician order dated 04/13/22 documented, .Yellow Zone: For symptomatic, suspected or residents being tested for COVID 19 . b. On 04/13/22 at 1:46 PM, resident #176 was in ambulating in her room with the door open and a Yellow Zone Transmission Based Precautions PPE required in Resident Rooms: N95 mask, gown, gloves, face shield/goggles taped to the door. At 1:47 PM RN #1 entered R#176's room wearing a surgical mask. She did not have the required isolation PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) on. RN#1 told R#176, You could fall .do you need some water . RN#1 then exited the room holding the resident's water pitcher with her bare hands. RN#1 was asked, Is she [R#176] on isolation? The nurse pointed to the sign on the resident's door. The nurse stated, She was leaning over I thought she was falling. The nurse was asked, What PPE were you supposed to don before entering her room? RN#1 stated, mask . while having difficulty remembering which type of mask. RN#1 was asked to read the sign on the door stating the PPE required. The nurse stated, N95 mask, gloves, gown and goggles or a face shield. RN#1 was asked, What is a potential complication of staff not wearing the appropriate PPE in a Resident's room that is quarantined for monitoring for COVID-19? RN#1 stated, The spread of COVID. The RN#1 then took the water pitcher to the nurse's station and was talking to other staff while only wearing a surgical mask. c. On 04/13/22 at 1:49 PM, the DON (Director of Nursing) was standing near R#176's room. She was asked, Did you see her [RN#1] enter without wearing the required PPE? The DON stated, Yes, .she [R176] will be coming off of quarantine on the 15th . d. On 4/14/22 at 9:35.AM, the IP (Infection Preventionist) nurse performed a COVID-19 rapid test on the Administrator. The IP nurse donned a N95 mask, gown and gloves to perform the procedure. After collecting the sample from the Administrator's nose and placing it in the vial she was asked, Should you have worn goggles during this procedure? She stated, Probably, I didn't think about it . The Administrator stated, We have been in the red zone for so long and we were all having to wear goggles. We just got off the Red Zone two weeks ago . On 4/14/22 at 9:58 AM, the IP nurse provided the manufacturer's instructions that documented, Collect the specimen by following CDC (Center for Disease Control) guidelines . The CDC guidelines provided by the DON on 4/12/22 titled Public Health Emergency related to Long-Term Care Facility Testing Requirements REF: QSO-20-38-NH revised date 3/10/22 page 9, documented, During Specimen collection, facilities must maintain proper infection control and use recommended personal protective equipment (PPE), which includes a NIOSH-approved N95 or equivalent or higher- level respirator .eye protection, gloves, and gown, when collecting specimens.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the kitchen floor was clean, dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment and food items, leftover food items...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the kitchen floor was clean, dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment and food items, leftover food items were dated and hot foods were served at or above 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to potential food borne illness for residents who received meal trays from 1 of 1 kitchen The failed practices had the potential to affect (how many?) residents who received meals from the kitchen (total census: 75), as documented on a list provided by Dietary Employee. The findings are: 1. On 4/11/2022 at 11:28 AM, the following observations were made with the Dietary Supervisor.: a. There was an unsealed box of coffee filters on the counter by the steam table. a. The floor throughout the kitchen was chipped and exposing the concrete underneath and discolored with black and white stains. b. The floor in front of the walk-in refrigerator and freezer was chipped and had an accumulation of dirt and debris. c. The legs of the food preparation counter had stains on them, along with greasy lint hanging down from the edges of the deep fryer. 2. On 4/11/2022 at 11:49 AM, Dietary Employee #1 was on the tray line assisting with meal service. She picked up cartons of milk, cartons of supplements, condiments and placed them on the trays and picked up glasses that contained beverages by their rims and placed them on the trays. 3. On 4/11/2022 at 12:50 PM, the temperature of the food items when checked and read on the plates in the kitchen. Ground meat balls with gravy was checked at 128.3 degrees Fahrenheit, and the diced potatoes was checked at 126 degrees Fahrenheit. They were then ready to be delivered to the residents. 4. On 4/11/2022 at 1:38 PM, the ice machine had wet gray/black residue on the top panel. The Dietary Supervisor was asked to wipe off the top panel. She did so, and the residue easily transferred to the tissue. The Dietary Supervisor was asked to describe the contents on the tissue. She stated, There were black/gray residue on the ice machine panel. The Dietary Supervisor was asked, How often do you clean the ice machine? She stated, We look at it daily. The Maintenance Man cleans every week. The Dietary Supervisor was asked, Who uses the ice from the ice machine and how often ice machine? She stated, That's the ice the CNAs [Certified Nursing Assistants] use for the water. The Dietary Employee pushed a food cart towards the steam table. She picked up condiments, milk cartons and supplements and placed them on the lunch trays without washing her hands. She also picked up glasses by their rims. 5. On 4/11/2022 at 4:46 PM, Dietary Employee #3 lifted the trash can lid and threw away tissue paper, which contaminated his hand. He picked up an alcohol pad, and wiped off the temperature gauge with it. At 5:23 PM, Dietary Employee #3 was asked what should he have done after touching dirty objects and before handling clean objects or food items. He stated, Washed my hands, 6. On 4/12/2022 at 8:34 PM, a zip lock bag that contained leftover sausage and leftover scrambled eggs were stored on a shelf in the refrigerator and had no date. On 4/12/2022 at 1:13 PM, Dietary Employee #4 was asked what was in the bag. She stated, There were leftover sausage from breakfast. We will use them for pureed meat for breakfast tomorrow. 7. The facility hand washing policy provided by the Dietary Supervisor on 4/12/2022 documented, When to wash hands: Immediately before engaging in food preparation including working with exposed food, clean equipment or service utensils and after engaging in any other activity that contaminates the hands.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0577 (Tag F0577)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview, the facility failed to ensure the results of the most recent survey was readily accessible for residents, family members, and representatives of residents. This failed practice had...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, the facility failed to ensure the results of the most recent survey was readily accessible for residents, family members, and representatives of residents. This failed practice had the potential to affect all 75 residents at the facility per the DON (Directors of Nursing) list provided on 4/11/22. The findings are: 1. On 04/12/22 at 9:59 AM, during the Resident Council meeting the attendees stated they had not been told where to access the previous survey findings. 2. On 4/12/22, a review of the Resident Council meeting minutes for 2021/2022 were reviewed. The was no documentation of the Residents being notified about where to find the previous survey findings. 3. On 4/12/22 at 1:46 PM, the Activities Director (AD) was asked, Who is responsible for assisting with the Resident Council? She stated, I do. She was asked, Have you informed the attendees of where to find the previous survey findings? She stated, I just took this position in February [2022] and I didn't know that I was supposed to, but we keep it in the Administrators office . 4. On 04/13/22 at 2:05 PM, the Administrator was asked, Where do you keep the last survey results? The Administrator got up from her desk and pulled a large white notebook labeled Surveys from a bookshelf in her office. She opened the book and began to remove the last survey findings. The Administrator was asked, Where should you store your previous survey findings? The Administrator stated, Other than the survey book .I don't have an answer for that. The Administrator and other personnel went to the facility's entrance common area and began to look in every shelf for the previous survey findings, but they did not find them. 5. On 04/13/22 at 2:31 PM, the Administrator entered the conference room and stated, We found it [the survey notebook] down on a lower shelf it was hard to find. We moved it to where it will be easily accessible now.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (80/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Arkansas.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
  • • 41% turnover. Below Arkansas's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • 14 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns THE BLOSSOMS AT MOUNTAIN VIEW REHAB & NURSING CEN an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen Staffed?

CMS rates THE BLOSSOMS AT MOUNTAIN VIEW REHAB & NURSING CEN's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 41%, compared to the Arkansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen?

State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at THE BLOSSOMS AT MOUNTAIN VIEW REHAB & NURSING CEN during 2022 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm, 12 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen?

THE BLOSSOMS AT MOUNTAIN VIEW REHAB & NURSING CEN is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by THE BLOSSOMS NURSING AND REHAB CENTER, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 97 certified beds and approximately 68 residents (about 70% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MOUNTAIN VIEW, Arkansas.

How Does The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, THE BLOSSOMS AT MOUNTAIN VIEW REHAB & NURSING CEN's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (41%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, THE BLOSSOMS AT MOUNTAIN VIEW REHAB & NURSING CEN has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen Stick Around?

THE BLOSSOMS AT MOUNTAIN VIEW REHAB & NURSING CEN has a staff turnover rate of 41%, which is about average for Arkansas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen Ever Fined?

THE BLOSSOMS AT MOUNTAIN VIEW REHAB & NURSING CEN has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen on Any Federal Watch List?

THE BLOSSOMS AT MOUNTAIN VIEW REHAB & NURSING CEN is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.