GREENE ACRES NURSING HOME
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Greene Acres Nursing Home in Paragould, Arkansas has a Trust Grade of C+, meaning it is slightly above average but not exceptional. It ranks #106 out of 218 facilities in the state, placing it in the top half, and it is the best option in Greene County, which only has two facilities. However, it is important to note that the facility's trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 3 in 2023 to 4 in 2024. Staffing is a relative strength, with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 41%, which is better than the state average. On the downside, there were specific concerns noted during inspections, including food not being labeled correctly in the kitchen, which could lead to food safety issues, and a failure to ensure safety measures for a resident who smokes despite having a chronic illness. While there are no fines against the facility, the presence of 19 issues, including 13 that could cause potential harm, raises some concerns about the overall quality of care.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Arkansas
- #106/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 41% turnover. Near Arkansas's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 27 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 19 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (41%)
7 points below Arkansas average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Arkansas average (3.1)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Arkansas avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
The Ugly 19 deficiencies on record
Jul 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure accommodation of needs were met by not ensuring the call light was within reach for one (Resident #23) of one resident
The findings ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to promote safety while smoking for one (Resident #78) of one sampled resident.
Findin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene before applying and taking off gloves, before, d...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that food was labelled correctly, and hand hygiene was performed in the kitchen to prevent cross contamination.
The fin...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
3. Resident #41 had diagnoses of COPD and Unspecified, Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal Phase.
a. A Physicians Order dated 04/12/23 documented, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure . every night shift for sle...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility developed and implemented a comprehensive care plan for Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and Ch...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Physician followed up on the Pharmacy Consultant recommendations to assess the correct diagnoses for 1 (Resident #67) of 3 (Res...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2022
12 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff sat with the residents and did not stand over them while assisting them with eating to promote dignity for 1 (Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure their abuse prohibition policies and procedures included the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknow origin was immediately reported to the O...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure all soiled areas were cleansed of urine; staff wiped from the front to back during incontinent care to promote good hy...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a positioning device was utilized to decrease the potential for further decline in range of motion for 1 (Resident #74)...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an antianxiety dose reduction was attempted, in the absence of a physician's documented evaluation of the potential risks versus ben...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
2. Resident (R) #9 had diagnoses of Congestive Heart Failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 4/4/22 documented t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 ice machines were maintained in clean and sanitary condition; the fan guard on the walk-in refrigerator was cleaned. Dietary St...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Advanced Beneficiary Notices (ABNs) were provided prior to coverage ending, as required by regulation, to inform residents and/or t...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0568
(Tag F0568)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and, interview, the facility failed to ensure proper bookkeeping techniques were followed to accurately reconcile individual resident funds for 43 of 43 (Residents #2, R3, R5, R...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0569
(Tag F0569)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Medicaid recipient residents and/or their responsible parties were notified when their trust balance was within, or approaching, $20...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0570
(Tag F0570)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Surety Bond was purchased in an amount that would fully cover the balance in the resident trust funds to prevent potential financi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- • 41% turnover. Below Arkansas's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 19 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Greene Acres's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns GREENE ACRES NURSING HOME an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Greene Acres Staffed?
CMS rates GREENE ACRES NURSING HOME's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 41%, compared to the Arkansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Greene Acres?
State health inspectors documented 19 deficiencies at GREENE ACRES NURSING HOME during 2022 to 2024. These included: 13 with potential for harm and 6 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Greene Acres?
GREENE ACRES NURSING HOME is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 143 certified beds and approximately 88 residents (about 62% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in PARAGOULD, Arkansas.
How Does Greene Acres Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, GREENE ACRES NURSING HOME's overall rating (3 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (41%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Greene Acres?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Greene Acres Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, GREENE ACRES NURSING HOME has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Greene Acres Stick Around?
GREENE ACRES NURSING HOME has a staff turnover rate of 41%, which is about average for Arkansas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Greene Acres Ever Fined?
GREENE ACRES NURSING HOME has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Greene Acres on Any Federal Watch List?
GREENE ACRES NURSING HOME is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.