RANDOLPH COUNTY NURSING HOME
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Randolph County Nursing Home in Pocahontas, Arkansas, has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice among nursing facilities. It ranks #77 out of 218 in the state, placing it in the top half, and is the best option out of the two facilities in Randolph County. The facility is on an improving trend, with a significant reduction in issues reported, going from 11 in 2024 to just 1 in 2025. Staffing is a strength, with a 4 out of 5 star rating and a turnover rate of 40%, which is lower than the state average. However, there have been concerns noted, including incidents where food items were not stored properly, exposing residents to potential foodborne illnesses, and failures in hand hygiene by staff, which could lead to cross-contamination. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and improvement trends, families should be aware of the identified concerns regarding food safety practices.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Arkansas
- #77/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 40% turnover. Near Arkansas's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 34 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Arkansas. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (40%)
8 points below Arkansas average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Arkansas avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record
Apr 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure expired food items and leftovers food items were promptly removed/discarded on or before the e...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
11 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #16) of 6 (Resident #16, #18, #84, #101, #119, and #126) sampled residents who receive a meal tray from the kitchen on the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 19 residents ' personal information was kept confidential. The findings are:
On 01/08/24 at 12:11 PM, the Surveyor observed a news and...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was followed for 1 (Resident #111) Resident of 6 (Residents #1, #5, #11, #62, #106, #111) sample m...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was not left unattended at the bedside; and topical ointments and mouthwash was stored properly for 2 f 2 R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) storage bag was changed weekly for 1 of 1 (Resident #119) sampled residents, and the faci...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure daily staffing schedules were posted in a public location. The findings are:
On 01/08/24 at 2:44 PM, the Surveyor did not observe a dai...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to store controlled medications were not stored properly in a permanently affixed box in 2 (100, and 300 Halls) of 4 Medication S...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0805
(Tag F0805)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump-free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff had on appropriate Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) for 1 of 1 (Resident #62) sampled residents that were on e...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the freezer, refrigerator and dry storage area were covered, sealed and dated to minimize the potential...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0565
(Tag F0565)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident concerns from the Resident Council Meeting were acted upon promptly for 1 of 1 (Resident #3) sampled residents. This fail...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the responsible party/family member was notified of changes in condition after new orders were obtained for 3 (Resident #1, Resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at temperatures that were acceptable to the residents to improve palatability and encourage good nutr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent the potential for cross contamination, expired ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- • 40% turnover. Below Arkansas's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Randolph County's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns RANDOLPH COUNTY NURSING HOME an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Randolph County Staffed?
CMS rates RANDOLPH COUNTY NURSING HOME's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 40%, compared to the Arkansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Randolph County?
State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at RANDOLPH COUNTY NURSING HOME during 2022 to 2025. These included: 16 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Randolph County?
RANDOLPH COUNTY NURSING HOME is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 140 certified beds and approximately 117 residents (about 84% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in POCAHONTAS, Arkansas.
How Does Randolph County Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, RANDOLPH COUNTY NURSING HOME's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (40%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Randolph County?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Randolph County Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, RANDOLPH COUNTY NURSING HOME has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Randolph County Stick Around?
RANDOLPH COUNTY NURSING HOME has a staff turnover rate of 40%, which is about average for Arkansas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Randolph County Ever Fined?
RANDOLPH COUNTY NURSING HOME has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Randolph County on Any Federal Watch List?
RANDOLPH COUNTY NURSING HOME is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.