SOUTHFORK RIVER THERAPY AND LIVING
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Southfork River Therapy and Living in Salem, Arkansas, has received a Trust Grade of A, indicating it is an excellent facility highly recommended for care. It ranks #33 out of 218 nursing homes in Arkansas, placing it in the top half, and is the only option in Fulton County. The facility is showing an improving trend, having reduced its issues from four in 2023 to none in 2024, which is encouraging. Staffing is generally strong with a 4 out of 5-star rating and a turnover rate of 42%, which is lower than the state average, suggesting that staff are experienced and familiar with the residents. However, there have been concerns noted, including inadequate food storage practices and unsecured hazardous items, such as razors, which could pose risks to residents. Overall, while there are areas needing improvement, the strengths of the facility, including high ratings and a commitment to better care, make it a viable option for families considering nursing home care.
- Trust Score
- A
- In Arkansas
- #33/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 42% turnover. Near Arkansas's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 20 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ○ Average
- 10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (42%)
6 points below Arkansas average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Arkansas avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record
Sept 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure potentially hazardous chemicals and hygiene pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Physicians Order was obtained for CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) usage for 1 (Resident #63) of 1 sampled...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals contained a pharmacy label, contained a date opened, and expired medications were removed from t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the appropriate use of gloves during medication administration to prevent potential cross contamination for 1 (Resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2022
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accura...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan addressed functional limitation in range of motion (ROM) to ensure appropriate interventions were develo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure incontinent care was provided in a manner to promote good hygiene, maintain skin integrity, and prevent potential urin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a splint, hand roll, and other positioning device was consistently utilized to prevent further decline in range of mot...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0805
(Tag F0805)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the freezer were covered or sealed and dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Arkansas.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- • 42% turnover. Below Arkansas's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
About This Facility
What is Southfork River Therapy And Living's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SOUTHFORK RIVER THERAPY AND LIVING an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Southfork River Therapy And Living Staffed?
CMS rates SOUTHFORK RIVER THERAPY AND LIVING's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 42%, compared to the Arkansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Southfork River Therapy And Living?
State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at SOUTHFORK RIVER THERAPY AND LIVING during 2022 to 2023. These included: 10 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Southfork River Therapy And Living?
SOUTHFORK RIVER THERAPY AND LIVING is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 68 certified beds and approximately 62 residents (about 91% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SALEM, Arkansas.
How Does Southfork River Therapy And Living Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, SOUTHFORK RIVER THERAPY AND LIVING's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (42%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Southfork River Therapy And Living?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Southfork River Therapy And Living Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SOUTHFORK RIVER THERAPY AND LIVING has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Southfork River Therapy And Living Stick Around?
SOUTHFORK RIVER THERAPY AND LIVING has a staff turnover rate of 42%, which is about average for Arkansas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Southfork River Therapy And Living Ever Fined?
SOUTHFORK RIVER THERAPY AND LIVING has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Southfork River Therapy And Living on Any Federal Watch List?
SOUTHFORK RIVER THERAPY AND LIVING is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.