BEAR CREEK SENIOR LIVING
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Bear Creek Senior Living has a Trust Grade of C+, which means it is considered decent and slightly above average when compared to other nursing homes. It ranks #54 out of 208 facilities in Colorado, placing it in the top half, and #5 out of 20 in El Paso County, indicating only a few local options are better. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from four in 2024 to two in 2025. Staffing is rated well at 4 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 36%, which is better than the state average, suggesting that staff are experienced and familiar with the residents. However, the facility has incurred $26,689 in fines, which is concerning as it is higher than 85% of Colorado facilities, indicating potential compliance issues. While the nursing home has more RN coverage than 99% of state facilities, which is a significant advantage for resident care, there have been serious incidents reported. For example, a resident who required assistance fell multiple times due to inadequate supervision, resulting in a hospital transfer for injuries. Another incident involved a resident needing two staff members for transfers but not receiving the required help, leading to a fracture. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain effective infection control measures, specifically related to water safety and COVID-19 vaccination offers for residents. Overall, while Bear Creek has strengths in staffing and RN coverage, these critical incidents raise concerns about resident safety.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Colorado
- #54/208
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 36% turnover. Near Colorado's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $26,689 in fines. Higher than 74% of Colorado facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 71 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Colorado nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (36%)
12 points below Colorado average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Colorado avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Jan 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a written discharge notice to to the resident or their rep...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Transfer
(Tag F0626)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to allow resident to return to the facility after transfer to a hospi...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who received respiratory care and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures related to pne...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
4 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent acc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to safely monitor and administer enteral nutrition, the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2021
3 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and an environment as free from accid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 36% turnover. Below Colorado's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 13 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $26,689 in fines. Higher than 94% of Colorado facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
About This Facility
What is Bear Creek Senior Living's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns BEAR CREEK SENIOR LIVING an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Colorado, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Bear Creek Senior Living Staffed?
CMS rates BEAR CREEK SENIOR LIVING's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 36%, compared to the Colorado average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Bear Creek Senior Living?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at BEAR CREEK SENIOR LIVING during 2021 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 11 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Bear Creek Senior Living?
BEAR CREEK SENIOR LIVING is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 45 certified beds and approximately 41 residents (about 91% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in COLORADO SPRINGS, Colorado.
How Does Bear Creek Senior Living Compare to Other Colorado Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Colorado, BEAR CREEK SENIOR LIVING's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (36%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Bear Creek Senior Living?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Bear Creek Senior Living Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, BEAR CREEK SENIOR LIVING has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Colorado. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Bear Creek Senior Living Stick Around?
BEAR CREEK SENIOR LIVING has a staff turnover rate of 36%, which is about average for Colorado nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Bear Creek Senior Living Ever Fined?
BEAR CREEK SENIOR LIVING has been fined $26,689 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Colorado average of $33,346. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Bear Creek Senior Living on Any Federal Watch List?
BEAR CREEK SENIOR LIVING is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.