WILLOWBROOKE COURT SKILLED CENTER AT MANOR HOUSE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Willowbrooke Court Skilled Center at Manor House has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is recommended and above average in quality. It ranks #13 out of 43 nursing homes in Delaware, placing it in the top half of facilities in the state, and #4 out of 11 in Sussex County, meaning only three local options are better. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from two in 2024 to one in 2025. Staffing is a strong point, receiving a perfect score of 5 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate at 42%, which is in line with the state average. The facility has no fines on record, which is a positive sign for compliance. However, there have been incidents, such as a resident suffering a leg fracture due to an unsafe transfer method that violated their care plan, and concerns over food storage and medication record-keeping that need addressing. Overall, while there are strengths, potential families should be aware of these weaknesses.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Delaware
- #13/43
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 42% turnover. Near Delaware's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Delaware facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 86 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Delaware nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 18 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (42%)
6 points below Delaware average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Delaware avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 18 deficiencies on record
May 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R8) out of five residents sampled for medication review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for insomnia. Fi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for three (R1, R7, and R114) out of twelve residents reviewed for care plans, the facility failed to meet professional standards of the Del...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview it was determined that for three (R1, R4, and R7) out of five residents reviewed for medication review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring of advers...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for R8, the facility failed to treat R8 with dignity and respect. Findings include:
5/1/21 - R8 was admitted to the facility.
...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, interviews and review of facility documentation, it was determined that for one (R9) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to limit an...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2021
13 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review, interview and review of facility documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one (R9) out of two sampled residents reviewed for accidents, the facility fail...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide meal service in a dignified manner for 18 randomly observed residents in the Magnolia Dining Room, as evidenced...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Grievances
(Tag F0585)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and review of facility policies and procedures it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the policy and postings included the process to file a grievance ano...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Assessments
(Tag F0636)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview it was determined that, for two (R15 and R28) out of thirteen (13) active residents sampled for an investigation of a care area, the facility failed to ensure the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview it was determined that, for one (R15) out of thirteen (13) active residents investigated for a care area, the facility failed to ensure that the required interdisc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that, for two (R3 and R28) out of thirteen (13) active residents sampled for an investigation of a care area, the facility failed t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, observation and interview it was determined that, for one (R15) out of one resident investigated for position/mobility, the facility failed to implement care and services to pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and review of facility policy and procedure, it was determined that for two (R25 and R337) out of two residents reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. Review of R3's clinical record revealed:
4/21/21 - R3 was admitted to the facility after a stroke.
4/22/21 - Physicians' Orde...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview it was determined that, for two (R22 and R25) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to have evidence of a duration period...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary storage of food in one out of two unit nourishment refrigerators. Findings include:
During nu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview it was determined that, for six (R2, R3, R11, R22, R25 and R31) out of six residents investigated for unnecessary medication review, the facility failed to ensure ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate infection surveillance for one resident (R11) out of two residents reviewed for con...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (80/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Delaware.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Delaware facilities.
- • 42% turnover. Below Delaware's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 18 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Willowbrooke Court Skilled Center At Manor House's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns WILLOWBROOKE COURT SKILLED CENTER AT MANOR HOUSE an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Delaware, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Willowbrooke Court Skilled Center At Manor House Staffed?
CMS rates WILLOWBROOKE COURT SKILLED CENTER AT MANOR HOUSE's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 42%, compared to the Delaware average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Willowbrooke Court Skilled Center At Manor House?
State health inspectors documented 18 deficiencies at WILLOWBROOKE COURT SKILLED CENTER AT MANOR HOUSE during 2021 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 17 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Willowbrooke Court Skilled Center At Manor House?
WILLOWBROOKE COURT SKILLED CENTER AT MANOR HOUSE is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by ACTS RETIREMENT-LIFE COMMUNITIES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 15 certified beds and approximately 7 residents (about 47% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SEAFORD, Delaware.
How Does Willowbrooke Court Skilled Center At Manor House Compare to Other Delaware Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Delaware, WILLOWBROOKE COURT SKILLED CENTER AT MANOR HOUSE's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.3, staff turnover (42%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Willowbrooke Court Skilled Center At Manor House?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Willowbrooke Court Skilled Center At Manor House Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, WILLOWBROOKE COURT SKILLED CENTER AT MANOR HOUSE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Delaware. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Willowbrooke Court Skilled Center At Manor House Stick Around?
WILLOWBROOKE COURT SKILLED CENTER AT MANOR HOUSE has a staff turnover rate of 42%, which is about average for Delaware nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Willowbrooke Court Skilled Center At Manor House Ever Fined?
WILLOWBROOKE COURT SKILLED CENTER AT MANOR HOUSE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Willowbrooke Court Skilled Center At Manor House on Any Federal Watch List?
WILLOWBROOKE COURT SKILLED CENTER AT MANOR HOUSE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.