EMORY L BENNETT MEMORIAL VETERANS NURSING HOME
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Emory L Bennett Memorial Veterans Nursing Home has a Trust Grade of D, which indicates below-average performance with some significant concerns. It ranks #493 out of 690 facilities in Florida, placing it in the bottom half of the state, and #26 out of 29 in Volusia County, suggesting limited options for improvement in the area. The facility's trend is stable, as it has consistently had five issues reported in both 2022 and 2024. Staffing is a relative strength, with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars, although the turnover rate is concerning at 58%, higher than the state average of 42%. However, there are troubling incidents noted in the inspector findings. For example, one resident experienced a fracture after a fall because the facility failed to manage their pain or recognize the change in their condition. Additionally, medication carts were found unlocked and unattended multiple times, raising concerns about medication safety. Lastly, the kitchen staff did not follow proper sanitation practices, which could lead to foodborne illness risks for residents. While there are strengths in staffing, these specific incidents highlight serious weaknesses that families should consider.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Florida
- #493/690
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $9,503 in fines. Higher than 69% of Florida facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 61 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Florida nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 15 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Florida average (3.2)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
12pts above Florida avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
10 points above Florida average of 48%
The Ugly 15 deficiencies on record
Oct 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#2) who was visually impai...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0645
(Tag F0645)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, interviews, and a review of the facility's policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that residents were properly screened for a mental disorder (MD) or intellectual ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #89) of a total survey sample of 31 resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0806
(Tag F0806)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide food that accommodated resident preferences, by failing to provide options of similar nutritive value to residents who requested a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on kitchen food service observations, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2022
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide three (Residents #11, #18, and #36) of three samped residents, notices of non-coverage to allow residents the opportunity to make i...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, medical record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #39) of 21 residents receiving r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a sa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments. This failure involved the Delta 5 hallway medication...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2021
5 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, resident interview, clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy and procedure review, the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on medical record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to send notification to the Office of the State Long-term Care Ombudsman of resident transfers and discharges for two (Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interview and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to monitor resident behaviors and p...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on kitchen food service observations, staff interviews, facility document review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation, food distribution and...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Room Equipment
(Tag F0908)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on kitchen food service observations, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure all essential kitchen equipment was maintained in safe operating c...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • 15 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • Grade D (43/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
- • 58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Emory L Bennett Memorial Veterans's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns EMORY L BENNETT MEMORIAL VETERANS NURSING HOME an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Emory L Bennett Memorial Veterans Staffed?
CMS rates EMORY L BENNETT MEMORIAL VETERANS NURSING HOME's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 58%, which is 12 percentage points above the Florida average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Emory L Bennett Memorial Veterans?
State health inspectors documented 15 deficiencies at EMORY L BENNETT MEMORIAL VETERANS NURSING HOME during 2021 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 14 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Emory L Bennett Memorial Veterans?
EMORY L BENNETT MEMORIAL VETERANS NURSING HOME is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility is operated by FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS' AFFAIRS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 120 certified beds and approximately 116 residents (about 97% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in DAYTONA BEACH, Florida.
How Does Emory L Bennett Memorial Veterans Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, EMORY L BENNETT MEMORIAL VETERANS NURSING HOME's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (58%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Emory L Bennett Memorial Veterans?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Emory L Bennett Memorial Veterans Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, EMORY L BENNETT MEMORIAL VETERANS NURSING HOME has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Emory L Bennett Memorial Veterans Stick Around?
Staff turnover at EMORY L BENNETT MEMORIAL VETERANS NURSING HOME is high. At 58%, the facility is 12 percentage points above the Florida average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Emory L Bennett Memorial Veterans Ever Fined?
EMORY L BENNETT MEMORIAL VETERANS NURSING HOME has been fined $9,503 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Florida average of $33,174. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Emory L Bennett Memorial Veterans on Any Federal Watch List?
EMORY L BENNETT MEMORIAL VETERANS NURSING HOME is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.