SUWANNEE VALLEY NURSING CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Suwannee Valley Nursing Center in Jasper, Florida has an excellent Trust Grade of A, indicating that it is highly recommended and performs well compared to other facilities. It ranks #124 out of 690 in Florida, placing it in the top half, and is the only option in Hamilton County. The facility's trend is stable, with the same number of issues reported in both 2024 and 2025, but there are some concerns, including a staffing turnover rate of 53%, which is higher than the Florida average. There have been no fines, suggesting compliance with regulations, and the nursing coverage is better than 85% of Florida facilities, ensuring that residents receive attentive care. However, there have been specific incidents of concern, such as failing to accurately document residents' use of respiratory equipment and not properly labeling and storing food, which could lead to safety risks. Additionally, an issue was noted where staff did not follow hand hygiene protocols during medication administration, raising infection control concerns. Overall, while the facility has strong ratings and no fines, families should be aware of these weaknesses.
- Trust Score
- A
- In Florida
- #124/690
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 53% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 59 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Florida. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Florida avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record
Mar 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were properly labeled and stored.
Findings include:
During an observation on 3/24/2025 at 9:20 AM while conducti...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene and followed infection control standard of practice during medication administration for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an attending practitioner's orders and indicat...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflect the re...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessm...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received medications in accordance with standard of practice for 1 of 7 residents reviewed, Resident #4.
Findings include:...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. Review of Resident #57's Progress Notes dated 12/1/2023 at 9:10 PM reads, Insulin Glargine-yfgn 100 Unit/ML [milliliter] Solution pen-injector, Inject 50 unit subcutaneously at bedtime related to t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control standards of practice while administering medications.
Findings include:
During an ob...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing information on a daily basis.
Findings include:
During an observation on 12/10/2023 at 9:15 AM, the f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2022
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent possible complications of enteral feeding including but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, and vomiting f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional princip...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Florida.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
- • 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Suwannee Valley Nursing Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SUWANNEE VALLEY NURSING CENTER an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Suwannee Valley Nursing Center Staffed?
CMS rates SUWANNEE VALLEY NURSING CENTER's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 53%, compared to the Florida average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Suwannee Valley Nursing Center?
State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at SUWANNEE VALLEY NURSING CENTER during 2022 to 2025. These included: 11 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Suwannee Valley Nursing Center?
SUWANNEE VALLEY NURSING CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 60 certified beds and approximately 54 residents (about 90% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in JASPER, Florida.
How Does Suwannee Valley Nursing Center Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, SUWANNEE VALLEY NURSING CENTER's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (53%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Suwannee Valley Nursing Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Suwannee Valley Nursing Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SUWANNEE VALLEY NURSING CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Suwannee Valley Nursing Center Stick Around?
SUWANNEE VALLEY NURSING CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 53%, which is 7 percentage points above the Florida average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Suwannee Valley Nursing Center Ever Fined?
SUWANNEE VALLEY NURSING CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Suwannee Valley Nursing Center on Any Federal Watch List?
SUWANNEE VALLEY NURSING CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.