VILLAGE ON THE ISLE

910 TAMIAMI TRAIL SOUTH, VENICE, FL 34285 (941) 486-5420
For profit - Corporation 48 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
95/100
#139 of 690 in FL
Last Inspection: May 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Village on the Isle in Venice, Florida, has received an impressive Trust Grade of A+, indicating it is an elite facility with top-tier care standards. It ranks #139 out of 690 nursing homes in Florida, placing it in the top half of state facilities, and #7 of 30 in Sarasota County, suggesting only six local options are better. However, the facility is experiencing a concerning trend, with the number of issues increasing from 1 in 2023 to 2 in 2024. Staffing is a strong point, boasting a 5/5 star rating with only 19% turnover, well below the state average, and it provides more RN coverage than 92% of Florida facilities. While there have been no fines reported, which is a positive sign, recent inspections revealed some concerns, including a failure to monitor a resident's daily weight as required and issues with the assessment and maintenance of grab bars, as well as unsecured medications at residents' bedsides. Overall, while there are many strengths, families should be aware of these weaknesses when considering this facility.

Trust Score
A+
95/100
In Florida
#139/690
Top 20%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Worse
1 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
19% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 29 points below Florida's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 113 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Florida nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 1 issues
2024: 2 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Low Staff Turnover (19%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (19%)

    29 points below Florida average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

No Significant Concerns Identified

This facility shows no red flags. Among Florida's 100 nursing homes, only 1% achieve this.

The Ugly 3 deficiencies on record

May 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0700 (Tag F0700)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Residents #3) of 3 residents reviewed with grab bars was assessed f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Residents #3) of 3 residents reviewed with grab bars was assessed for alternative interventions prior to the use of grab bars. The facility failed to assess for danger of entrapment prior to use of the use of the grab bars and failed to conduct periodic maintenance of the grab bars to ensure they remained safe for resident's use. The facility had a total of 30 residents using grab bars. The findings included: The facility policy bedrails dated 6/11/18 documented, The facility shall provide adequate management of bedrails to ensure that residents attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Procedure: 1) The facility will attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail. 2) If a bed or side rail is used, the facility will ensure correct installation, use and maintenance of bedrails, including: Assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bedrails prior to installation . Follow the manufacturers recommendations and specifications for installing and maintaining the bedrails. The manufacturers User-Service Manual for the bedrails specified, Warning, risk of serious injury or death. Do not use this assist device if any openings within the assist body will allow a resident to get his/her head or neck lodged within these openings . Proper combinations of bed, mattress, head/foot panels and assist devices are needed to minimize the risk of entrapment. Entrapment zones involve the relationship of components often directly assembled by the healthcare facility rather than the manufacturer. Therefore, compliance is the responsibility of the facility . Long term care facilities have particular exposure since serious entrapment events, typically involve frail, elderly or dementia patients. On 5/13/24 at 12:41 p.m., Resident #3 was observed in bed on a scoop (raised borders) mattress, over the bed trapeze (helps to move in bed), and grab bars on both sides of the bed in a raised position. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #3 had a readmission date of 9/27/23, with diagnoses including depression, anxiety, morbid obesity, cerebral infarction, macular degeneration, and weakness. A physician order dated 1/29/24 specified assist rail to left and right side of the bed to assist with bed mobility, and transfers, per resident request. A side rail consent form was signed by the resident on 1/1/29/24. The quarterly side rail assessment screen dated 2/16/24 documented side rails were indicated to enable positional changes and improve bed mobility. There were no documentation of alternatives interventions attempted before the grab bars were applied. On 5/14/24 at 2:35 p.m., in an interview the Director of Rehabilitation (DOR) said the therapy department screens the residents upon admission. If the resident is unable to turn in bed or sit up then they try the grab bar and if the resident is able to use it to increase function, then it is recommended. The DOR said there was no alternative intervention to use other than a trapeze, the facility did not have enough of them, and not all residents were able to use the trapeze due to lack of muscle strength. The DOR said therapy staff did not document the alternatives attempted and why they were not appropriate for the resident. The DOR said, That is a nursing thing. Review of the Occupational Therapy and Physical Therapy evaluation and plan of treatment for Resident #3 dated 9/10/23 did not document the use of a trapeze, scoop mattress or grab bars. The Director said he had no documentation alternate interventions were attempted prior to recommending the grab bars. On 5/14/24 at 3:07 p.m., in an interview the Director of Nursing (DON) said she was aware the therapy documentation did not include screening for the use of the grab bars. On 5/15/24 at 8:47 a.m., the DON said the beds do not have the grab bars on them until therapy evaluates the resident and if they feel the resident will benefit from them, that is when we get an order and have them placed on the beds. The DON said Resident #3 was admitted several years ago and had a recent admission to the hospital. She said, we just left the trapeze and everything on the bed because we knew she would be back, we did not remove it. On 5/15/24 at 2:54 p.m., in an interview the Maintenance Director said, Every month I do bed inspections. I check the gaps between the mattress and headboard and the footboard. I check the wires and the locks. The Maintenance Director said there is a lock that hold the mattress from moving up or down, but it can move sideways. When therapy asks him to put the grab bars on, that is when he puts them on the bed. He removes them when a resident leaves. The Maintenance Director said, Like I said, I check the welds, wires the whole bed, I move it up and down to make sure it is functioning. I do not check the entrapment zones for the grab bars. I do not check for entrapment with the grab bars and I don't do routine maintenance on them.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to obtain daily weights as ordered for 1 (Resident #4) of 1 resident reviewed with congestive heart failure, which may cause the reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to obtain daily weights as ordered for 1 (Resident #4) of 1 resident reviewed with congestive heart failure, which may cause the resident to retain fluids. The findings included: The facility policy Physician Services with a date of June 13, 2018, documented, . All physician orders will be followed as prescribed and if not followed, the reason shall be recorded on the resident's medical record during that shift . Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #4 had a readmission date of 4/26/24. Diagnoses included dementia, chronic kidney disease, and congestive heart failure(CHF). On 4/29/24 at 8:58 a.m., the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) documented in a progress note Resident #4 had non-pitting edema (swelling that feels firm to touch) to the right lower leg, right ankle, and left ankle. The APRN noted the edema was dependent upon positioning. On 4/29/24 at 11:02 a.m., the physician issued an order for daily weight to be completed before breakfast and confirmed by the nurse for a diagnosis of heart failure. The order specified to notify the physician if Resident #4 gained more than two pounds (lbs.) in 24 hours or greater than five lbs. in a week. On 4/29/24 at 2:04 p.m., the Registered Dietitian documented a readmission assessment noting Resident #4 had 2+ pitting edema (swelling that leaves an indentation when pressed) to both lower extremities, and daily weights were being monitored. Review of the weight record showed the following recorded weights: 4/29/2024: 139.2 lbs. 5/1/2024: 134.9 lbs. 5/5/2024: 136.0 lbs. 5/6/2024: 135.8 lbs. 5/9/2024: 130.6 lbs. 5/11/2024: 130.9 lbs. 5/13/24: 140.1 lbs. There were no weights documented on 4/30/24 and no documentation Resident #4 refused to be weighed. On 5/2/24 at 3:03 p.m., the nurse documented the resident refused to get out of bed to be weighed. On 5/3/24 at 6:52 a.m., the nurse progress note documented resident does not want to get up, get dressed now, will have day Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) obtain weight before breakfast. On 5/4/24 at 6:44 a.m., the nurse documented day CNA will obtain weight when resident is ready to get up and dressed. On 5/7/24 at 7:06 a.m., the nurse documented day CNA to obtain the weight before breakfast. On 5/8/24 at 6:09 a.m., the nurse documented day CNA will obtain weight when dressed and awake. On 5/10/24 there was no documentation of why the weight was not obtained as ordered. On 5/12/24 at 5:52 a.m., the nurse documented day CNA will obtain weight when resident is dressed and ready to wake up. On 5/14/24 at 1:19 p.m., in an interview Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff A said the resident refuses to be weighed at times. The LPN said, today, she refused, and I documented it in the progress note. LPN Staff A was not able to locate the missing weights in the electronic clinical record and said the weights would not be written anywhere else. Staff A said, I go with the CNA to weigh the resident. On 5/14/24 at 1:50 p.m., in an interview the Director of Nursing (DON) said the Certified Dietary Manager or the Unit Manager had the missing weights on a paper and had not put them into the electronic record yet. The DON said, I understand what you are saying when asked how the nurses would know and notify the physician if the resident had a weight gain of two lbs. in 24 hours or five lbs. in one week if the weights were not documented. On 5/15/24 at 8:35 a.m., in an interview the DON, said she was not able to locate Resident #4's missing weights but was told the resident refused to be weighed. The DON verified there was no documentation Resident #4 consistently refused to be weighed and no documentation the physician was notified of the missing weights. On 5/16/24 at 9:13 a.m., in an interview the APRN said she was not aware the weights were not consistently obtained as ordered. The APRN said the fact that the facility did not follow the physician order was a concern.
Jan 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, review of facility's policy and procedure, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to label, and safely store medications for 3 (Resident #19, #21, #16) of 4 residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, review of facility's policy and procedure, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to label, and safely store medications for 3 (Resident #19, #21, #16) of 4 residents observed with unsecured medications at the bedside. The findings included: The facility policy titled Resident Self-Administration of Medications dated June 13, 2018 Specified, If medications are stored at the resident's bedside, a lockbox or locked drawer must be used to store the medication(s). 1. On 1/17/23 at 11:02 a.m., and on 1/18/23 at 12:45 p.m., an over the counter bottle of Tylenol and Tylenol PM were observed stored unsecured at Resident #16's bedside. On 1/18/23 at 3:06 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff G said if a resident self-administers medications, they are stored in a locked cabinet in the bathroom. On 1/18/23 at 3:09 p.m., Resident #16 said he's had the two bottles of over the counter medications at his bedside for six months. 3. On 1/17/23 at 12:40 p.m., an unlabeled box of individual use Retaine eye drops was observed stored on Resident #19's bedside table. Resident #19 was in a recliner, watching television. Resident #19 said her significant other brought the box of eye drops for her in case she needed them. She said she nurses administer the eye drops. On 1/18/23 at 11:00 a.m., Resident #19 was in her room watching television. The Retaine eye drops remained unsecured on the bedside table. On 1/19/2023 at 3:22 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff H verified Resident #19 had an unsecured box of Retaine eye drops stored at the bedside. On 1/20/2023 at 11:00 a.m., in a joint interview the Director of Nursing (DON) and the facility Administrator said no medication should be stored unsecured at the bedside. 2. On 1/17/23 at 10:45 a.m., during a tour of the facility, observation of one bottle of Refresh Relieva Ophthalmic Solution 0.5-0.9% eye drops sitting on Resident #21's bedside table. The medication did not have a pharmacy label with the resident's name, the name of the medication with directions for use, and/or any other pertinent information. On 1/17/23 at 10:46 a.m., Resident #21 said, she was admitted to the facility in September 2021. She said she uses the Refresh eye drop to moisturize her left eye. She is unable to put the eye drops in her eyes so when she needs the eye drops, she would call the nurse and they would put the eye drops into her eyes. She said the Refresh eye drops are kept in her room on her over the bed table even when she is not in her room. She said she did not remember the nursing staff explaining to her the directions for the use of the eye medication and how to safely keep the medication in her room. On 1/17/23 at 3:15 p.m., a bottle of Refresh Relieva Ophthalmic Solution 0.5-0.9% eye drops was observed sitting on Resident #21's bedside table. Resident #21 was not in her room during the observation. On 1/17/23 at 3:30 p.m., Registered Nurse (RN), Staff E said Resident #21 was out of the facility for an appointment. She confirmed a bottle of Refresh Relieva Ophthalmic Solution 0.5-0.9% eye drops was sitting on Resident #21's bedside table, and the medication did not have a pharmacy label with the resident's name, the name of the medication with directions for use, and/or any other pertinent information. Staff E said residents were allowed to self-administer and keep the medication in their room after a self-administration assessment was completed and the interdisciplinary team (IDT) determined it was safe for the resident to administer the medication. Then it would be safe for the resident to keep the medication in their room. Staff E said she had seen the Refresh eye drops on Resident #21's bedside table for the past couple of months but did not know how long she's had them. On 1/19/23 at 10:53 a.m., the DON confirmed Resident #21's Refresh eye drops were kept on Resident #21's bedside table, not in a secure area, and the medications did not have a pharmacy label with the resident's name, the name of the medication with directions for use, and/or any other pertinent information.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A+ (95/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Florida.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
  • • Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Village On The Isle's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns VILLAGE ON THE ISLE an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Village On The Isle Staffed?

CMS rates VILLAGE ON THE ISLE's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 19%, compared to the Florida average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Village On The Isle?

State health inspectors documented 3 deficiencies at VILLAGE ON THE ISLE during 2023 to 2024. These included: 3 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Village On The Isle?

VILLAGE ON THE ISLE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 48 certified beds and approximately 49 residents (about 102% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in VENICE, Florida.

How Does Village On The Isle Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, VILLAGE ON THE ISLE's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (19%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Village On The Isle?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Village On The Isle Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, VILLAGE ON THE ISLE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Village On The Isle Stick Around?

Staff at VILLAGE ON THE ISLE tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 19%, the facility is 27 percentage points below the Florida average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 4%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.

Was Village On The Isle Ever Fined?

VILLAGE ON THE ISLE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Village On The Isle on Any Federal Watch List?

VILLAGE ON THE ISLE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.