MAGNOLIA MANOR OF MARION COUNTY
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Magnolia Manor of Marion County has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average compared to other facilities, but not without its issues. It ranks #135 out of 353 nursing homes in Georgia, placing it in the top half, and is the only option in Marion County. The facility's performance has been stable, with 12 issues identified in recent inspections, including concerns about food preparation and medication storage that could potentially affect residents' health. Staffing is average with a turnover rate of 57%, which is not ideal but aligns with state averages, and the facility has not incurred any fines, which is a positive sign. Specific incidents include failures to ensure nutritional value in pureed diets and improper labeling of food items, highlighting areas needing improvement alongside its strengths.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Georgia
- #135/353
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 57% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Georgia facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 30 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Georgia. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Georgia average (2.6)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
11pts above Georgia avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
9 points above Georgia average of 48%
The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record
Jan 2025
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Residents Rights/ Facility Responsibilities...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Restorative Nursing, the facility ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration-General, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policies titled, Capillary Blood Sampling (Finger Stick Blood Sugar), Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care I...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, staff interviews and review of the facility's policy titled, Pureed Food Preparation, the facility failed to ensure the nutritional value of meat during the pureed process. Spec...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for one resident (R #50) of 13 residents on...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Controlled Drug Accountability and Reconciliation the facility failed to maintain accurate records on controlled su...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R# 50 revealed diagnosis that included generalized anxiety disorder and Alzheimer's disease. Further review of the medical record revealed the foll...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, staff interviews, review of pharmacy guidelines, review of latanoprost ophthalmic solutions manufacturer packet insert, review of the Trelegy Ellipta oral inhalant manufacturer ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, the facility failed to label, and date opened food items in the dry storage area and faile...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2021
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Work Orders the facility failed to ensure the...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to post the daily nurse staffing information in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors during the three-day surve...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Georgia facilities.
- • 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • 57% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Magnolia Manor Of Marion County's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns MAGNOLIA MANOR OF MARION COUNTY an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Georgia, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Magnolia Manor Of Marion County Staffed?
CMS rates MAGNOLIA MANOR OF MARION COUNTY's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 57%, which is 11 percentage points above the Georgia average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Magnolia Manor Of Marion County?
State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at MAGNOLIA MANOR OF MARION COUNTY during 2021 to 2025. These included: 11 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Magnolia Manor Of Marion County?
MAGNOLIA MANOR OF MARION COUNTY is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by MAGNOLIA MANOR SENIOR LIVING, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 70 certified beds and approximately 64 residents (about 91% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in BUENA VISTA, Georgia.
How Does Magnolia Manor Of Marion County Compare to Other Georgia Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Georgia, MAGNOLIA MANOR OF MARION COUNTY's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (57%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Magnolia Manor Of Marion County?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Magnolia Manor Of Marion County Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, MAGNOLIA MANOR OF MARION COUNTY has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Georgia. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Magnolia Manor Of Marion County Stick Around?
Staff turnover at MAGNOLIA MANOR OF MARION COUNTY is high. At 57%, the facility is 11 percentage points above the Georgia average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Magnolia Manor Of Marion County Ever Fined?
MAGNOLIA MANOR OF MARION COUNTY has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Magnolia Manor Of Marion County on Any Federal Watch List?
MAGNOLIA MANOR OF MARION COUNTY is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.