TAYLOR COUNTY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Taylor County Health and Rehabilitation has a Trust Grade of D, which means it is below average and has some concerning issues. It ranks #232 out of 353 facilities in Georgia, placing it in the bottom half, but it is the only option in Taylor County. The facility is worsening, with the number of reported issues increasing from 3 in 2023 to 7 in 2024. Staffing is a relative strength, with a turnover rate of 35%, which is better than the state average of 47%. However, there are some troubling incidents, such as a resident who required two staff members for bathing but was only assisted by one, leading to a fall and injury, and issues with food safety practices. While the nursing home does have some good points, families should be aware of these significant weaknesses.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Georgia
- #232/353
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 35% turnover. Near Georgia's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $8,512 in fines. Lower than most Georgia facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 20 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Georgia. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (35%)
13 points below Georgia average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Georgia average (2.6)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
11pts below Georgia avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Aug 2024
3 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review titled Patient's Plan of Care, the facility failed to ensure the d...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Fall Management, the facility failed to ensure res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Skilled Nursing Services, Hand Hygiene, the facility failed to ensure an effective infection control and prev...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Suprapubic Catheter Care, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff provided routine...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of an instructional document titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, published by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Hydration, the facility failed to offer additional fluids to residents on one of three units, the secure unit, during ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility policy titled Allocation of Human Resources Nursing Staff, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff in the secure unit...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy titled, Medication Administration - General and Enteral Tube Medication Administration, the facility failed to ensur...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility policies titled, Storage Areas and Cleaning and Sanitizing, the facility failed to securely close open food items in the dry stora...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, staff interviews, and a review of the facility policy titled, Information Technology - Safeguarding and Storage of Protected Health Information (PHI), the facility failed to ensu...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2021
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility document titled, Bed Hold During Hospital Stays and Therape...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update care plan interventions to include a nutritional suppl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy titled Nutrition Screening, Assessment, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 35% turnover. Below Georgia's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 harm violation(s), Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 13 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • Grade D (43/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Taylor County's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns TAYLOR COUNTY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Georgia, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Taylor County Staffed?
CMS rates TAYLOR COUNTY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 35%, compared to the Georgia average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Taylor County?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at TAYLOR COUNTY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION during 2021 to 2024. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 11 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Taylor County?
TAYLOR COUNTY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by CLINICAL SERVICES, INC., a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 78 certified beds and approximately 68 residents (about 87% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in BUTLER, Georgia.
How Does Taylor County Compare to Other Georgia Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Georgia, TAYLOR COUNTY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (35%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Taylor County?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Taylor County Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, TAYLOR COUNTY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Georgia. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Taylor County Stick Around?
TAYLOR COUNTY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION has a staff turnover rate of 35%, which is about average for Georgia nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Taylor County Ever Fined?
TAYLOR COUNTY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION has been fined $8,512 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Georgia average of $33,164. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Taylor County on Any Federal Watch List?
TAYLOR COUNTY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.