SPRING HARBOR AT GREEN ISLAND
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Spring Harbor at Green Island has a Trust Grade of B+, which indicates it is above average and recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #37 out of 353 nursing homes in Georgia, placing it in the top half of facilities statewide, and #1 out of 7 in Muscogee County, showing it is the best local choice. The facility's trend is stable, with 3 issues consistently noted in both 2023 and 2024, which means they are not worsening but also not improving. Staffing is relatively concerning with a turnover rate of 69%, significantly higher than the state average of 47%, though they maintain a solid RN coverage. Notably, there have been no fines, which suggests compliance with regulations. However, there are some weaknesses to consider. Recent inspector findings revealed that food items were not properly labeled and secured, which could pose a risk to residents. Additionally, there were concerns about the management of psychotropic medications, as some residents did not have stop dates for their prescriptions, and the facility lacked a documented process for reviewing antibiotic prescribing practices, potentially impacting resident care. Overall, while Spring Harbor has many strengths, families should weigh these issues carefully.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Georgia
- #37/353
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 69% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Georgia facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 42 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Georgia. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ○ Average
- 9 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
23pts above Georgia avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
21 points above Georgia average of 48%
The Ugly 9 deficiencies on record
Nov 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Glucometer Disinfection, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control measures were followed for cleaning...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy titled, Use of Psychotropic Medication, the facility failed to ensure a stop date was implemented, not to exceed 14 days, f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Labeling Food Product, the facility failed to ensure that opened food items were labeled, dated, and secured from open ai...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Self-A...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and a review of the facility's policies titled, CPAP/BIPAP Cleaning, and Nebulizer Therapy the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Antibiotic Stewardship
(Tag F0881)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policies titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program and Antibiotic Stewardship Program, the facility failed to provide eviden...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2021
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plan the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan related to use of oxygen for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plan the facility failed to rev...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen, the facility failed to ensure...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (85/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Georgia.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Georgia facilities.
- • 69% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Spring Harbor At Green Island's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SPRING HARBOR AT GREEN ISLAND an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Georgia, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Spring Harbor At Green Island Staffed?
CMS rates SPRING HARBOR AT GREEN ISLAND's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 69%, which is 23 percentage points above the Georgia average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Spring Harbor At Green Island?
State health inspectors documented 9 deficiencies at SPRING HARBOR AT GREEN ISLAND during 2021 to 2024. These included: 9 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Spring Harbor At Green Island?
SPRING HARBOR AT GREEN ISLAND is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 40 certified beds and approximately 32 residents (about 80% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in COLUMBUS, Georgia.
How Does Spring Harbor At Green Island Compare to Other Georgia Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Georgia, SPRING HARBOR AT GREEN ISLAND's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (69%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Spring Harbor At Green Island?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Spring Harbor At Green Island Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SPRING HARBOR AT GREEN ISLAND has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Georgia. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Spring Harbor At Green Island Stick Around?
Staff turnover at SPRING HARBOR AT GREEN ISLAND is high. At 69%, the facility is 23 percentage points above the Georgia average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Spring Harbor At Green Island Ever Fined?
SPRING HARBOR AT GREEN ISLAND has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Spring Harbor At Green Island on Any Federal Watch List?
SPRING HARBOR AT GREEN ISLAND is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.