VISTA PARK HEALTH AND REHABILITATION
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Vista Park Health and Rehabilitation has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating that it is above average and recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #107 out of 353 facilities in Georgia, placing it in the top half, and is the only nursing home in Coffee County, making it the best local option. The facility is newly inspected, so there is no trend data available yet. Staffing is a moderate strength with a 3/5 rating and a turnover rate of 33%, which is better than the state average, suggesting that staff generally stay long enough to build relationships with residents. There have been no fines, which is a positive sign. However, there are some concerns noted in the inspection findings: two residents were found to have unsecured medications at their bedside, which could pose a safety risk, and one resident did not receive necessary assistance with daily activities as per their care plan. Additionally, another resident requiring nail care did not receive it, indicating areas where the facility could improve its services. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and no fines, there are some important issues that families should consider.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Georgia
- #107/353
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Too New
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 33% turnover. Near Georgia's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Georgia facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 20 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Georgia. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ✓ Good
- Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (33%)
15 points below Georgia average of 48%
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
13pts below Georgia avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 3 deficiencies on record
Mar 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies titled, Self -Administr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy, titled, Patient's Plan of Care the facility failed to follow the care plan for one of 20 Residents (R) R85 th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, resident interview, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Care of fingernails/Toenails, the facility failed to ensure that nail care was provided for one o...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (80/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Georgia.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Georgia facilities.
- • Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
- • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
About This Facility
What is Vista Park's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns VISTA PARK HEALTH AND REHABILITATION an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Georgia, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Vista Park Staffed?
CMS rates VISTA PARK HEALTH AND REHABILITATION's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 33%, compared to the Georgia average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Vista Park?
State health inspectors documented 3 deficiencies at VISTA PARK HEALTH AND REHABILITATION during 2024. These included: 3 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Vista Park?
VISTA PARK HEALTH AND REHABILITATION is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by CLINICAL SERVICES, INC., a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 168 certified beds and approximately 122 residents (about 73% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in DOUGLAS, Georgia.
How Does Vista Park Compare to Other Georgia Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Georgia, VISTA PARK HEALTH AND REHABILITATION's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (33%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Vista Park?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Vista Park Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, VISTA PARK HEALTH AND REHABILITATION has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Georgia. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Vista Park Stick Around?
VISTA PARK HEALTH AND REHABILITATION has a staff turnover rate of 33%, which is about average for Georgia nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Vista Park Ever Fined?
VISTA PARK HEALTH AND REHABILITATION has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Vista Park on Any Federal Watch List?
VISTA PARK HEALTH AND REHABILITATION is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.