HART CARE CENTER

261 FAIRVIEW AVENUE, HARTWELL, GA 30643 (706) 376-7121
For profit - Corporation 117 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
90/100
#14 of 353 in GA
Last Inspection: March 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Hart Care Center in Hartwell, Georgia, has an excellent Trust Grade of A, indicating that it is highly recommended and performs well compared to other facilities. It ranks #14 out of 353 nursing homes in Georgia, placing it in the top half of the state, and is the best option among the two facilities in Hart County. The facility has recently undergone its first inspection and has a good staff turnover rate of 36%, which is lower than the state average, but it only received a 4 out of 5 for staffing, indicating room for improvement. Notably, there have been no fines reported, which is a positive sign. However, there was one concern identified during the inspection regarding the training of feeding assistants, which could potentially expose residents with swallowing disorders to risks like aspiration pneumonia or choking. While the overall ratings are strong, families should consider both the strengths and the noted concern when evaluating this nursing home.

Trust Score
A
90/100
In Georgia
#14/353
Top 3%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Too New
0 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
36% turnover. Near Georgia's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Georgia facilities.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 25 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Georgia. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 1 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
: 0 issues
2025: 1 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (36%)

    12 points below Georgia average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 36%

Near Georgia avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

The Ugly 1 deficiencies on record

Mar 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0811 (Tag F0811)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the staff trained through the P...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the staff trained through the Paid Feeding Assistants (PFA) program did not provide assistance to residents with swallowing disorders or were at risk for aspiration for one of three sample residents (Resident (R) 115) reviewed for swallowing disorders out of a total sample of 23 residents . Failure to ensure the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) identified residents who could be assisted with meals by the PFA, increased the risk R115 could experience aspiration pneumonia and/or choking. Findings include: The policy Paid Feeding Assistants dated 10/17, included the following directives: 1. Paid feeding assistants provide assistance only for resident [sic] with no complicated feeding problems include difficulty swallowing, recurrent lung aspirations and tube or parenteral IV feedings. 2. Resident are assessed for the appropriateness for the feeding assistant program by the interdisciplinary team, taking into account the most recent assessment and plan of care. 3. Only residents who have been selected by the interdisciplinary team are eligible for feeding assistance by a paid feeding assistant. R115's admission Record tab in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) identified an admission dated of [DATE], with hospice services in place. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], revealed the full assessment had not yet been completed. Review of the EMR Orders tab revealed physician orders for a pureed no added salt diet with nectar think liquids. The MDS assessment indicated R115 was dependent on staff for eating. Review of a Nursing Note dated [DATE], documented by an Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) under the tab for nursing notes, , identified concerns about the resident swallowing abilities. The entry stated, After lunch today the resident continued to cough and spit out clear frothy mucus the entry went on to note lungs clear . puree diet and ordered palliative set up suction at bedside if needed The entry went on to explain that a crushed medication was administered with thicken liquids to help manage the oral secretions observed. On [DATE], at 12:30 PM, the residents in the dining room were seated at three tables. Each table had staff seated next to them assisting with feeding. Each table had one and/or two staff members seated next to residents who were assisting with feeding. On [DATE] at 12:30 PM, R115 was seated in the dining room, next to her was the Activities Director (AD) who was assisting by feeding her a pureed diet and nectar thick liquids. Two other residents sitting at the table were eating with verbal prompts and encouragement. On [DATE], at 12:45 PM, LPN 2 who was supervising the dining session was interviewed. LPN 2 explained the second seating in the dining room was for residents who were dependent on the staff for eating. When asked about the staff observed assisting the residents, she identified four of the five staff observed were Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's), except the AD who was assisting R115. When asked about the AD specifically, she explained the AD was also a CNA. On [DATE] at 2:00 PM, the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) 2, was interviewed and identified she coordinated the PFA program. She provided the training curriculum. MDSC2 then provided the names of the staff who had completed the program, which included AD. When asked which residents were eligible to receive assistance from the PFA, she stated the IDT had not reviewed or identified residents who were eligible to receive services from staff who completed the PFA training. On [DATE] at 12:00 PM the AD was interviewed, when asked if she was a CNA, she stated her CNA license expired. The AD explained she had last worked as a CNA in 2023 and had recently returned to work at the facility taking the position as the AD and added she had completed the PFA training. On [DATE] at 2:15 PM, during a follow up interview when asked who directed her to assist R115 with the meal, the AD stated, she could not recall.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Georgia.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Georgia facilities.
  • • Only 1 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Hart's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns HART CARE CENTER an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Georgia, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Hart Staffed?

CMS rates HART CARE CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 36%, compared to the Georgia average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Hart?

State health inspectors documented 1 deficiencies at HART CARE CENTER during 2025. These included: 1 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Hart?

HART CARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 117 certified beds and approximately 63 residents (about 54% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in HARTWELL, Georgia.

How Does Hart Compare to Other Georgia Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Georgia, HART CARE CENTER's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (36%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Hart?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Hart Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, HART CARE CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Georgia. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Hart Stick Around?

HART CARE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 36%, which is about average for Georgia nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Hart Ever Fined?

HART CARE CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Hart on Any Federal Watch List?

HART CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.