MCRAE MANOR NURSING HOME
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
MCRAE MANOR NURSING HOME has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating poor quality and significant concerns about care. It ranks #295 out of 353 nursing homes in Georgia, placing it in the bottom half of facilities in the state, and is the second option out of two in Telfair County. The facility is worsening, with the number of reported issues increasing from 2 in 2022 to 10 in 2024. Staffing is a relative strength with a turnover rate of 0%, significantly lower than the state average, and the home has good RN coverage, surpassing 79% of Georgia facilities, which can help catch potential problems. However, the facility has incurred $98,970 in fines, indicating compliance issues, and has been cited for inadequate maintenance of the environment, such as broken handrails and unsanitary ice machines, which could pose safety risks for residents.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Georgia
- #295/353
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $98,970 in fines. Lower than most Georgia facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 34 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Georgia. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Georgia average (2.6)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
Well above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record
Jul 2024
10 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Record review revealed R29 had diagnoses that included (partial list): Spina Bifida with hydrocephalus, periapical abscess wi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Administration Medication Polic...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Activities of Da...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and the facility policies titled Accidents and Incidents-Investiga...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and the facility policy titled Urinary Catheter, Maintenance of Indwelli...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview and review of the policy titled Medication Monitoring and Management, the facility fa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Maintenance of Indwelling Urinary Catheters, the facility failed to properly perform infection control practi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews and review of Job Description and Performance Standards - Maintenance Supervisor, the fa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and review of policy titled Production, Storage and Dispensing of Ice, the facility failed to maintain the cleanliness of one of two ice machines, ensure proper storag...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0700
(Tag F0700)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4.Review of the clinical record for R66 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in three...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, staff interviews and review of the facility policy titled Medication Monitoring and Manage...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2019
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0660
(Tag F0660)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Discharge Planning, the facility failed to d...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0740
(Tag F0740)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on resident interviews, record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide behavioral treatment services to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage in the Facility the facility failed to ensure that the medication cart was locked when unattended f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Disposal of Medications and Medication-Related Supplies/Syringe and Needle Disposal the facility failed to ensure infe...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • $98,970 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Georgia. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (35/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Mcrae Manor's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns MCRAE MANOR NURSING HOME an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Georgia, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Mcrae Manor Staffed?
CMS rates MCRAE MANOR NURSING HOME's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Mcrae Manor?
State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at MCRAE MANOR NURSING HOME during 2019 to 2024. These included: 16 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Mcrae Manor?
MCRAE MANOR NURSING HOME is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by PEACH HEALTH GROUP, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 133 certified beds and approximately 79 residents (about 59% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in MC RAE, Georgia.
How Does Mcrae Manor Compare to Other Georgia Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Georgia, MCRAE MANOR NURSING HOME's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.6 and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Mcrae Manor?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Mcrae Manor Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, MCRAE MANOR NURSING HOME has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Georgia. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Mcrae Manor Stick Around?
MCRAE MANOR NURSING HOME has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Mcrae Manor Ever Fined?
MCRAE MANOR NURSING HOME has been fined $98,970 across 16 penalty actions. This is above the Georgia average of $34,069. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.
Is Mcrae Manor on Any Federal Watch List?
MCRAE MANOR NURSING HOME is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.