RETREAT, THE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
The Retreat nursing home in Monticello, Georgia has a Trust Grade of C, meaning it is average and falls in the middle of the pack compared to other facilities. It ranks #163 out of 353 facilities in Georgia, placing it in the top half, and is the only option in Jasper County. Unfortunately, the facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with the number of issues increasing from 2 in 2023 to 4 in 2025. Staffing is a positive aspect, with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 42%, which is below the state average, indicating that staff members are generally stable and familiar with the residents. However, the facility has incurred fines of $15,269, which is concerning as it is higher than 87% of Georgia facilities, suggesting compliance issues. Recent inspections revealed critical issues, including a failure to provide CPR to a resident who had a full code order when they were found unresponsive, which could have serious implications for all residents with similar orders. Additionally, there were concerns about expired food not being discarded properly, which could risk foodborne illness, and a high medication error rate of 10%, putting three residents at risk of receiving incorrect dosages. While there are strengths in staffing, these significant weaknesses raise concerns about the overall quality of care at this facility.
- Trust Score
- C
- In Georgia
- #163/353
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 42% turnover. Near Georgia's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $15,269 in fines. Higher than 83% of Georgia facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 34 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Georgia. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ○ Average
- 7 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (42%)
6 points below Georgia average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Georgia average (2.6)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Georgia avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 7 deficiencies on record
Mar 2025
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 perce...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Floor Stock and Medication Administration, the facility failed to ensure no expired medications were s...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policies titled Hand Hygiene and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), the facility failed to ensure effective infec...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility's policy titled Food Storage, the facility failed to ensure that expired food items were discarded in the refrigerator and dry foo...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
3. Record review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R11 revealed a diagnosis including but not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease
Record review of the mos...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2023
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0678
(Tag F0678)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to provide cardiopulmonary...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2022
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy titled Cleaning and Disinfecting the Glucometer, and staff interviews, the facility failed to disinfect the glucometer between resident u...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 42% turnover. Below Georgia's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 7 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $15,269 in fines. Above average for Georgia. Some compliance problems on record.
- • Grade C (56/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Retreat, The's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns RETREAT, THE an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Georgia, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Retreat, The Staffed?
CMS rates RETREAT, THE's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 42%, compared to the Georgia average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Retreat, The?
State health inspectors documented 7 deficiencies at RETREAT, THE during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 6 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Retreat, The?
RETREAT, THE is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 55 certified beds and approximately 51 residents (about 93% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MONTICELLO, Georgia.
How Does Retreat, The Compare to Other Georgia Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Georgia, RETREAT, THE's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (42%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Retreat, The?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Retreat, The Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, RETREAT, THE has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Georgia. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Retreat, The Stick Around?
RETREAT, THE has a staff turnover rate of 42%, which is about average for Georgia nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Retreat, The Ever Fined?
RETREAT, THE has been fined $15,269 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Georgia average of $33,232. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Retreat, The on Any Federal Watch List?
RETREAT, THE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.