CRITICAL
(K)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. Review of the clinical record revealed R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including
diabetes, hyperte...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. Review of the clinical record revealed R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including
diabetes, hypertension (HTN), depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Review of the admission MDS for R23 dated 1/15/2024 revealed a BIMS of six, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Section I revealed the resident has diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (a-fib) and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).
Review of the February 2024 Clinical Physicians' Orders revealed an order dated 1/11/2024 for apixaban oral tablet (a medication used to help prevent strokes or blood clots) 5 milligram (mg) one tablet twice a day; and an order dated 1/12/2024 for Enteric Coated Aspirin (medication used to help prevent strokes or blood clots) 81 mg once daily.
Review of the care plan initiated on 1/11/2024 did not have focus areas or interventions specific to R23's use of anticoagulant medications or his diagnosis of PTSD.
Interview on 2/10/2024 at 1:30 pm, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) HH, stated the diagnosis of PTSD and the resident's triggers for PTSD, should be on the resident's care plan, so the nursing staff would be aware of the triggers for PTSD. She further stated the use of anticoagulant medications should also be on the resident's care plan with interventions to follow.
Interview on 2/11/2024 at 9:50 am with Registered Nurse (RN) MDS Coordinator II, verified that R23 has a diagnosis of PTSD, and confirmed there was not a care area addressing triggers for PTSD. During further review, RN MDS Coordinator II revealed there was not a care plan area or interventions for anticoagulant use. She stated the MDS Coordinator was responsible for ensuring the care plans were updated quarterly with each MDS assessment.
Interview on 2/11/2024 at 10:00 am, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated her expectation is for the residents care plans to be accurate to reflect the residents current conditions, and that the staff follow the care plan, because it is a tool to inform staff of resident care areas. During further interview, she stated R23's care plan should have been developed for PTSD and for the use of anticoagulants, because those were admitting diagnoses when he admitted to the facility.She indicated the MDS Coordinator was responsible for ensuring the care plans were updated and were person-centered for each resident.
5. Review of the clinical record revealed R51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, hypertension (HTN), depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Review of the Quarterly MDS for R23 dated 12/20/2023 revealed a BIMS of five, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Section I revealed the resident has diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).
Review of the care plan revised 1/4/2024 revealed there was not a care plan focus area for PTDS identifying triggers for PTD on the care plan.
Interview on 2/10/2024 at 9:10 am, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) FF stated she was unaware of R51's diagnosis of PTSD or his triggers related to PTSD. She stated CNAs were normally made aware of resident diagnoses and needs by the nurse or by looking at the care plan.
Interview on 2/10/2024 at 9:50 am, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) GG confirmed R51 had a diagnosis of PTSD. She stated the care plan should identify things that may trigger PTSD and verified there was not a care plan addressing PTSD or triggers identified on R51's care plan.
Interview on 2/10/2024 at 1:30 pm, LPN HH revealed a diagnosis of PTSD and the resident's triggers should be on the resident's care plan so the nursing staff would be aware of the diagnosis and the triggers.
Interview on 2/10/2024 at 9:50 am, RN MDS Coordinator II revealed a diagnosis of PTSD would be considered part of the behavior care plan. She further stated if the resident exhibited behaviors related to PTSD, a care area would be developed for PTSD. She verified there was not a care area for PTSD nor triggers for R51's PTSD diagnosis on the care plan. She stated the care plans was reviewed and updated at least quarterly with each MDS assessment.
Interview on 2/11/2024 at 10:00 am, the DON stated her expectations were for the diagnosis of PTSD to have a care plan area with interventions and for the care plan to include the residents' PTSD triggers. She stated staff should be aware of a resident's PTSD triggers to aid in providing proper care related to PTSD and the care plan was a tool to inform staff of resident concerns.
Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of the policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, the facility failed to follow the care plan related to trach supplies for three residents (R) (R68, R70, R76). In addition, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for three residents (R23) for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and anti-coagulant use; R38 for the use of psychotropic medications, and R51 for PTSD. The sample size was 37.
On February 9, 2024, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or had the likelihood to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents.
The facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on February 9, 2024, at 2:39 pm. The noncompliance related to the immediate jeopardy was identified to have existed on June 21, 2023.
At the time of exit on 2/12/2024, an acceptable Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan had not been received, therefore the Immediate Jeopardy remained ongoing.
Findings:
Review of policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised December 2016, policy statement indicated a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: Number 2. The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. Additionally, the care plan would be updated based on ongoing assessments of the resident and any changes in condition the resident experienced during their care.
1. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R68 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, including tracheostomy status, acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia (increased carbon dioxide), dependence on respirator status.
Review of the most recent admission Minimal Data Set (MDS) for R68 dated 1/8/2024 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not recorded, with documentation that resident is rarely/never understood. Section O revealed the resident received oxygen therapy, suctioning, invasive mechanical ventilator, non-invasive mechanical ventilator, tracheostomy care.
Review of the care plan for R68 created on 1/4/2024 revealed a focus on tracheostomy related to impaired breathing mechanics. Interventions to ensure that trach ties are secured at all times; monitor/document for restlessness, agitation, confusion, and (increased heart rate) tachycardia, and bradycardia (slow heart rate); monitor/document respiratory rate, depth, and quality, check and document every shift/as ordered, O2 (oxygen) as ordered, change tubing weekly, provide good oral care daily and as needed (PRN), provide paper and pencil if needed, work with resident to develop communication system that will work in an emergency, reassure resident to decrease anxiety, suction as necessary. Tube out procedures: Keep extra trach tube and obturator at bedside. If tube is coughed out, open stoma with hemostat. If tube cannot be reinserted, monitor/document for signs of respiratory distress. If able to breathe spontaneously, elevate head of bed (HOB) to 45 degrees and stay with the resident. Obtain medical help immediately.
Observation on 2/9/2024 at 8:05 am revealed R68 lying semi-Fowler in the bed. The ventilator has minimal condensation in the tubing. A pulse oximeter is connected to the resident, displaying a good waveform and reading. A suction machine is at the bedside. Further observation revealed that R68 does not have an obturator visible at the bedside and no emergency tracheostomy supplies at the bedside. The respiratory therapist in the room confirmed this finding.
2. Review of the EMR for R70 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, including tracheostomy status (a surgical procedure to open a direct airway through an incision in the trachea [windpipe]), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen), dependence on respirator (ventilator) status.
Review of the Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed BIMS was coded as five, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Section O revealed the resident received oxygen therapy, suctioning, invasive mechanical ventilator, and tracheostomy care.
Review of the care plan for R70 created on 12/29/2023 revealed a focus on tracheostomy related to impaired breathing mechanics. Interventions to ensure that trach ties are secured at all times; monitor/document for restlessness, agitation, confusion, tachycardia, and bradycardia; monitor/document respiratory rate, depth, and quality, check and document every shift/as ordered, O2 as ordered, change tubing weekly, provide good oral care daily and PRN, provide paper and pencil if needed, work with resident to develop communication system that will work in an emergency, reassure resident to decrease anxiety, suction as necessary. Tube out procedures: Keep extra trach tube and obturator at bedside. If tube is coughed out, open stoma with hemostat. If tube cannot be reinserted, monitor/document for signs of respiratory distress. If able to breathe spontaneously, elevate HOB 45 degrees and stay with the resident. Obtain medical help immediately.
Observation on 2/9/2024 at 8:45 am of R70 shows the resident lying supine in bed with clean linens and well groomed. R70 is ventilator-dependent and attached to a pulse oximeter with a heart rate and oxygen saturation reading displaying good waveform. The ventilator tubing has minimal condensation. A suction machine is at the bedside. There was no visible obturator at the resident's bedside and no emergency tracheostomy supplies.
Observational tour on 2/9/2024 at 8:50 am, Registered Respiratory Therapist (RRT) AA revealed she was unable to locate emergency tracheostomy supplies at the bedside for three residents (R68, R70, and R76). She indicated there were some supplies in the supply closet but was unable to locate the appropriate trach sizes for the residents with tracheostomies. Surveyor accompanied RRT AA to a Respiratory Cart where she located some respiratory supplies (gauze, gloves, masks, suction, saline, and adapters), but cart did not have any tracheostomy tubes or obturators in it. RRT AA further revealed she had been employed in the facility since November 2023 and had not been informed regarding the need to have emergency trach supplies at each residents bedside.
3. Review of the EMR for R76 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including tracheostomy status, respiratory failure unspecified whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia, dependence on respirator status, and unspecified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Record review of the most recent Quarterly MDS for R76 dated 1/24/2024 revealed resident is rarely/never understood. Section O revealed the resident received oxygen therapy, suctioning, invasive mechanical ventilator, and tracheostomy care.
Record review of the care plan for R76 created on 10/18/2023 revealed a focus on tracheostomy related to impaired breathing mechanics. Interventions to ensure that trach ties are secured at all times; monitor/document for restlessness, agitation, confusion, and tachycardia, and bradycardia; monitor/document respiratory rate, depth, and quality, check and document every shift/as ordered, O2 as ordered, change tubing weekly, provide good oral care daily and PRN, provide paper and pencil if needed, work with resident to develop communication system that will work in an emergency, reassure resident to decrease anxiety, suction as necessary. Tube out procedures: Keep extra trach tube and obturator at bedside. If tube is coughed out, open stoma with hemostat. If tube cannot be reinserted, monitor/document for signs of respiratory distress. If able to breathe spontaneously, elevate HOB 45 degrees and stay with the resident. Obtain medical help immediately.
Observation on 2/9/2024 at 8:30 am revealed that R76 was lying supine in the bed connected to a ventilator with minimal condensation visible in the tubing. R76 has a pulse oximeter connected to the finger with a good waveform and reading. Further observation revealed there was no obturator visible at the bedside and no emergency tracheostomy supplies. This observation was confirmed by the RRT AA at the bedside.
Interview on 2/11/2024 at 1:33 pm, Director of Respiratory Therapy (DORT) stated he could view a resident's care plan through the EMR system and used the care plan during his shifts to identify a resident's individualized needs while providing care. He added resident care plans were adjusted as needed based on a resident's change in condition. The DORT explained that if an intervention needed to be added, removed, or modified, he would alert Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) JJ to update the care plan.
Interview on 2/12/2024 at 1:40 pm, Registered Nurse (RN) EE indicated she reviews the resident's care plan at the beginning of her shift to see if there were any changes or updates related to the resident's care or needs. RN EE explained that the care plan provided specific individualized information about care, such as vent settings, suctioning needs, and communication. She added that if she needed to modify the care plan to reflect any new changes, she would notify LPN JJ to make the required changes.
6. Review of the clinical record revealed R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, urinary retention, dysphagia, gout, hypertension (HTN), and anxiety disorder.
Review of the Significant Change MDS OBRA Assessment, dated 3/2/2023, Section V, Care Area Assessment (CAA) Area, revealed psychotropic medications was triggered as a care area for R38.
Review of the Physician Orders (PO) dated 12/22/2023 revealed an order for lorazepam (a medication used to treat anxiety) 1 mg/milliliter (ml) every 4 hours as needed (PRN) for anxiety.
A review of R38's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the resident received lorazepam 1mg per mL topically on the following dates and times:
12/22/2023 at 6:03 pm, 12/23/2023 at 8:03 am, 1:05 pm, and 8:18 pm, 12/25/2023 at 8:00 pm, 12/26/2023 at 8:01 pm, 12/27/2023 at 1:56 am, 12/30/2023 at 9:12 am, 1/4/2024 at 12:34 pm, 1/5/2024 at 8:45 am and 9:09 pm, 1/10/2024 at 4:40 pm and 8:45 pm, 1/11/2024 at 4:00 am, 1/12/2024 at 8:00 pm, 1/13/2024 at 8:36 pm, 1/14/2024 at 3:35 pm, 1/16/2024 at 1:55 am, 1/17/2024 at 8:59 am, 4:26 pm and 8:42 pm, 1/18/2024 at 2:00 am and 8:02 pm, 1/19/2024 at 8:17 pm, 1/23/2024 at 8:06 pm, 1/24/2024 at 00:30 am and 7:43 pm, 1/28/2024 at 4:12 pm, 1/29/2024 at 8:24 pm, 2/3/2024 at 8:59 am, 2/5/24 at 7:50 pm, and 2/8/2024 at 8:00 pm.
Review of R38's care plan revealed R38 did not have a care plan developed for psychotropic medication.
During an interview on 2/10/2024 at 12:11 pm with the Director of Nursing (DON), she acknowledged that R38 did not have a care plan developed addressing the use of psychotropic medications, and stated she should have had one.
CRITICAL
(K)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Review of the document titled Part II - Policies and Procedures for Nursing Facility Services; Georgia Department of Community H...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Review of the document titled Part II - Policies and Procedures for Nursing Facility Services; Georgia Department of Community Health, Division of Medical Assistance dated July 1, 2014, Chapter 800, Section 804: Mechanical Ventilation Services, 804.5 Nursing Facility Staffing, Equipment and Requirements revealed providers of mechanical ventilation services will provide the following as part of or in addition to the requirements for traditional facility care: Licensed nursing services on the ventilator unit 24 hours a day; at least 12 hours a day must be provided by a Registered Nurse. Nursing services will be provided in an appropriate ratio according to patient acuity, not to exceed a ratio of 1:10 nurses per ventilator-dependent resident.
Review of an undated document on facility letterhead documented Staffing levels for the 15-bed Ventilator Unit: One Registered Nurse, One Licensed Practical Nurse, One Respiratory Therapist, Two Certified Nursing Assistants; 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Review of the Licensed Nursing schedules for the ventilator unit for November 2023, December 2023, and January 2024 revealed the nurse assigned to work on the ventilator unit was notated with the letter L for Licensed Practical Nurse or RN for Registered Nurse. Further review of the nursing schedules revealed there was not 12 hours of RN coverage on the ventilator unit for each day. November 2023 schedule had 15 of 30 days with RN coverage for 12 hours; December 2023 schedule had 10 of 31 days without RN coverage; and January 2024 schedule had 16 of 31 days without RN coverage for 12 hours.
Interview on 2/10/2024 at 12:30 pm, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that there was not an RN scheduled to work on the ventilator unit 12 hours daily for the months of November 2023, December 2023, or January 2024. During further interview, she stated she was unaware that an RN must work on the ventilator unit for 12 hours daily, but thought an RN just had to be in the building. She stated the facility only had two RN's employed by the facility, to work on the ventilator unit.
Interview on 2/11/2024 at 1:16 pm, DON reported that the education binder for 2023 is missing. She stated the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) left the facility in October 2023, so they are having to start fresh this year, with herself and the Infection Preventionist (IP) currently providing trainings. During further interview, the DON indicated that a lot of the training is talking and utilizing YouTube videos.
Interview on 2/11/2024 at 2:10 pm, the Administrator stated he was unaware that an RN was required to be assigned to the ventilator unit for at least 12 hours each day. He stated it was not easy to find RN's willing to work on the ventilator unit.
Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, review of the Policies and Procedures for Nursing Facility Services, the facility failed to ensure emergency tracheostomy supplies were at the bedside for three of 15 sampled residents (R) (68, 70, 76). In addition, facility failed to change the oxygen nasal cannula (N/C) tubing per physician orders or as needed for R49, failed to provide ongoing training for staff working on the ventilator unit, and failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) worked on the ventilator unit for at least 12 hours per day.
On February 9, 2024, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or had the likelihood to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents.
The facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on February 9, 2024, at 2:39 pm. The noncompliance related to the immediate jeopardy was identified to have existed on June 21, 2023.
At the time of exit on 2/12/2024, an acceptable Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan had not been received, therefore the Immediate Jeopardy remained ongoing.
Findings Include:
Review of the document titled Part II - Policies and Procedures for Nursing Facility Services; Georgia Department of Community Health, Division of Medical Assistance dated July 1, 2014, Chapter 800, Section 804: Mechanical Ventilation Services, 804.5 Nursing Facility Staffing, Equipment and Requirements revealed durable medical equipment and supplies to meet the needs of the ventilator-dependent resident to include but not be limited to: Number 5. Supplies required to support the equipment such as suction catheters, tracheostomy supplies, and oxygen.
1. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, including tracheostomy status, acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia (increased carbon dioxide), and dependence on respirator status.
Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Section O documented the resident received oxygen therapy, suctioning, and tracheostomy care.
Review of the care plan dated 1/4/2024 revealed the resident has a tracheostomy related to impaired breathing mechanics. Interventions to care include ensure that trach ties are secured at all times. Tube out procedures: Keep extra trach tube and obturator at bedside. If tube is coughed out, open stoma with hemostat. If tube cannot be reinserted, monitor/document for signs of respiratory distress. If able to breathe spontaneously, elevate HOB 45 degrees and stay with the resident. Obtain medical help immediately.
Review of the February 2024 Order Summary Report revealed an order dated 1/12/2024 for
Shiley 6 flex, change inner cannula daily, trach care every shift and as needed, without orders for whether the trach is to be cuffed or uncuffed, or emergency management if the trach should become dislodged.
Observation on 2/9/2024 at 8:05 am revealed R68 lying semi-Fowler in the bed, A suction machine is at the bedside. There are no visible emergency tracheostomy supplies or obturator at the resident's bedside. These observations were confirmed by the Registered Respiratory Therapist (RRT) AA at the bedside.
Observation on 2/10/2024 at 9:15 am in the room of R65, revealed emergency tracheostomy supplies and an obturator visible at the bedside.
2. Review of the EMR revealed R70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including tracheostomy status, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and dependence on respirator (ventilator).
Review of the Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE], Section O documented the resident received oxygen therapy, suctioning, and tracheostomy care.
Review of the care plan initiated on 12/29/2023 revealed resident has a tracheostomy related to impaired breathing mechanics. Interventions to care include ensure that trach ties are secured at all times. Tube out procedures: Keep extra trach tube and obturator at bedside. If tube is coughed out, open stoma with hemostat. If tube cannot be reinserted, monitor/document for signs of respiratory distress. If able to breathe spontaneously, elevate HOB 45 degrees and stay with the resident. Obtain medical help immediately.
Review of the February 2024 Order Summary Report revealed an order dated 12/30/2023 for
Shiley 6 flex, trach care every shift and as needed, without orders for whether the trach is to be cuffed or uncuffed, or emergency management if the trach should become dislodged.
Observation on 2/9/2024 at 8:45 am R70 lying supine in bed. There are no visible emergency tracheostomy supplies or obturator at the resident's bedside. These observations were confirmed by the RRT AA at the bedside.
Observation on 2/10/2024 at 9:00 am, R70 continues to lay supine in the bed connected to a ventilator with a pulse oximeter connected to the finger. Further observation revealed emergency trach supplies and obturator have been placed at the bedside.
3. Review of the EMR revealed R76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including tracheostomy status, respiratory failure unspecified whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia, dependence on respirator status, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], Section O documented the resident received oxygen therapy, suctioning, and tracheostomy care.
Review of the care plan initiated on 10/18/2023 revealed resident has a tracheostomy related to impaired breathing mechanics. Interventions to care include ensure that trach ties are secured at all times and suction as necessary. Tube out procedures: Keep extra trach tube and obturator at bedside. If tube is coughed out, open stoma with hemostat. If tube cannot be reinserted, monitor/document for signs of respiratory distress. If able to breathe spontaneously, elevate HOB 45 degrees and stay with the resident. Obtain medical help immediately.
Review of February 2024 Order Summary Report revealed an order dated 12/7/2023 for trach orders: 7 Luer Lock, cuffed, trach care every shift and as needed, and ventilator settings PS 10/+6/405/36%. There are no orders for emergency management if the trach should become dislodged.
Observation on 2/9/2024 at 8:30 am in the room of R76, revealed no emergency trach supplies or obturator were at the bedside. This observation was confirmed by the RRT AA at the bedside.
Observation on 2/10/2024 at 9:40 am revealed that R76 is connected to a ventilator with a pulse oximeter in place. Further observation revealed emergency trach supplies and obturator have been placed at the bedside.
Observational tour on 2/9/2024 at 8:50 am, Registered Respiratory Therapist (RRT) AA revealed she was unable to locate emergency tracheostomy supplies at the bedside for three residents (R68, R70, and R76). She indicated there were some supplies in the supply closet but was unable to locate the appropriate trach sizes for the residents with tracheostomies. Surveyor accompanied RRT AA to a Respiratory Cart where she located some respiratory supplies (gauze, gloves, mask, suction, saline, and adapters), but cart did not have any tracheostomy tubes or obturators in it. RRT AA further revealed she had been employed in the facility since November 2023 and had not been informed regarding the need to keep emergency trach supplies at each residents bedside.
Interview on 2/9/2024 at 10:00 am, Administrator indicated the facility had tracheostomy supplies in another supply building, and staff were looking for sizes to fit the resident's tracheostomies. Administrator stated he was reaching out to outside resources, from sister facilities or the local hospital, for emergency tracheostomies supplies needed for the residents.
Interview on 2/9/2023 at 12:10 pm, RRT AA stated that she and other therapists searched the facility inventory for emergency supplies and tracheostomy tubes for current residents and revealed an extensive list of supplies needed for the residents in the facility. During further interview, RRT AA stated that someone from the facility was going to borrow these supplies from the hospital.
Interview on 2/10/2024 at 9:15 am, the Director of Respiratory Therapy (DORT) stated staff could find some tracheostomy supplies in the resident rooms, and stated there was a supply closet down the hall that has tracheostomy supplies. During further interview, the DORT stated he was unsure why obturators were not kept at residents bedside.
Interview on 2/11/2024 at 1:30 pm, the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed her expectation was for all the staff to know what tracheostomy supplies are needed for each resident, and where the extra supplies are located. During further interview, she stated staff working on the ventilator unit should be educated and trained to work on the ventilator unit.
The DON provided education for the ventilator unit staff, consisting of nine Licensed Practical Nurses, one Registered Nurse, one Infection Preventionist, one Minimum Data Set Registered Nurse, and one Registered Respiratory Therapist. The DON confirmed this was all the education staff received regarding the ventilator unit, equipment, and supplies.
Interview on 2/11/24 at 2:50 pm, RN EE revealed she started working at the in January 2024. She revealed she has not received any training from the facility regarding ventilator alarms, the need for emergency tracheostomy supplies to be kept at bedside or end tidal CO2 monitoring for the residents.
4. Review of EMR revealed R49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but was not limited to acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, obstructive sleep apnea (OSB), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with acute exacerbation.
Review of the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. Section O revealed the resident received oxygen therapy.
Review of the care plan for R49 documented the resident has altered respiratory status and difficulty breathing related to pulmonary edema ad sleep apnea. Interventions to care include keep head of bed elevated for shortness of breath, oxygen as ordered and change tubing weekly.
Review of February 2024 Order Summary Report revealed an order dated 12/2/2023 to change oxygen and nebulizer tubing weekly and label and date the tubing every Saturday.
Review of February 2024 electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) revealed oxygen tubing was changed on 2/10/2024. However, the date on the tubing was not legible and the tubing remained pink throughout the duration of the survey.
During an observation on 2/9/2024 at 3:46 pm, R49 was noted to be in bed in her room with oxygen in use via nasal cannula (N/C). The oxygen tubing was noted to have a pink tint. The date on the oxygen tubing was not legible.
During an observation on 2/10/2024 at 10:42 am, R49 was in bed asleep. The oxygen N/C continued to have a pink tint to the oxygen tubing.
During an interview on 2/10/2024 at 2:00 pm, R49 was observed in bed with oxygen N/C in place. She reported that the tubing has been changed a few times since her admission in December, but she revealed it had been a while. The tape with the date on the tubing was not legible. The oxygen tubing remained pink throughout the duration of the survey.
During an interview and observation on 2/11/2024 at 2:00 pm, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) in R49's room, confirmed the oxygen tubing was pink. She stated that the oxygen tubing could be changed anytime during the seven-day period. During further interview, the ADON stated she was unsure why the oxygen tubing was pink and confirmed she was unable read the date on the oxygen tubing.
A request for the policy for Oxygen Administration was requested but it did not address changing the tubing.
CRITICAL
(K)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Administration
(Tag F0835)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, review of Policies and Procedures for Nursing Facility Services and review of job descriptions for the Administrator and the Director of Respira...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, review of Policies and Procedures for Nursing Facility Services and review of job descriptions for the Administrator and the Director of Respiratory Operations (DORT), the facility administration failed to provide monitoring and oversight for the Mechanical Ventilation Unit (MVU) by ensuring the respiratory ventilator equipment was functioning appropriately with audible alarms, and monitoring end title carbon dioxide (ETCO2) for six of six sampled ventilator dependent residents (R) (R281, E, F, R68, R70, R76). In addition, administration failed to ensure emergency tracheostomy supplies were available at the bedside for three of 15 residents (R) (R 68, R70, R76) reviewed for tracheostomy care.
On February 9, 2024, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or had the likelihood to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents.
The facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on February 9, 2024, at 2:39 pm. The noncompliance related to the immediate jeopardy was identified to have existed on June 21, 2023.
At the time of exit on 2/12/2024, an acceptable Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan had not been received, therefore the Immediate Jeopardy remained ongoing.
Findings Include:
Review of the document titled Part II - Policies and Procedures for Nursing Facility Services; Georgia Department of Community Health, Division of Medical Assistance dated July 1, 2014, Chapter 800, Section 804: Mechanical Ventilation Services, 804.5 Nursing Facility Staffing, Equipment and Requirements revealed durable medical equipment and supplies to meet the needs of the ventilator-dependent resident to include but not be limited to: Number 2. Pulse oximetry monitors. Number 3. End tidal CO2 analyzers. Number 4. An audible, redundant external alarm system is located outside the patient room to alert caregivers of ventilator failure.
Review of the undated document titled Nursing Home Administrator revealed the responsibilities are defined as:
lead and direct the overall operation of the facility in accordance with resident needs, federal and state government regulations, and company policies/procedures to maintain quality of care for the residents while achieving the facility's business objectives.
Works with facility management staff and consultants in planning all aspects of operations, including setting priorities and job assignments.
Conducts regular rounds to ensure resident needs are being addressed and monitors operations of all departments.
Demonstrates knowledge of all state rules and regulations and provides adequate instruction regarding such rules and regulations to appropriate staff.
Review of the document titled Director of Respiratory Operations revealed the responsibilities are defined as:
train and support all RT, RN and CNA staff, for up to date policy and procedures for care of respiratory patience{sic}.
evaluate RT, RN, and CNA staff monthly, so proper care can be administered.
educate and implement central supply inventory for par levels.
educate and implement tracking of all mechanical equipment inventory.
educate and implement tracking of equipment that are out for repair. Will educate and implement central supply.
work as a team with the Regional Director, Administrator, clinical department and admissions personal{sic}.
1. Administration failed to ensure that ventilator equipment functioned appropriately with audible alarms and failed to provide monitoring of ETCO2 for ventilator dependent residents, in accordance with Policies and Procedures for Nursing Facility Services. R281 had a decline in condition that resulted in death after being found unresponsive when staff did not hear audible ventilator alarms from outside the room.
Cross Refer F908
Interview on 2/9/2024 at 8:10 am, Registered Respiratory Therapist (RRT) AA revealed she has been employed at the facility since November 2023. She stated the audible alarms for the ventilators have not worked since she has been employed, and further stated they do not alarm outside the resident rooms. During further interview, she stated staff can be in one room providing care for a resident, and if other staff are not in the hallway, a resident could be in distress in another room, when staff can't hear the alarms, places the residents at risk for death.
Interview on 2/9/2024 at 8:30 am, Director of Nursing (DON) stated she was aware the alarms were not working, and indicated the facility was planning to contact the ventilator company by phone next week, to discuss what to do about the alarms. She stated RT OO has previously reported alarm concerns. During further interview, she reported she is unsure when the system went out, but stated staff were doing more frequent rounds on the ventilator residents and denies any complications. The DON denies any complications with residents since the alarms have been out.
A phone interview on 2/9/2024 at 10:44 am, Operations Respiratory Therapist (ORT) revealed he comes to the facility every couple of weeks and was not aware the alarms were not working. During further interview, the ORT stated he does not take oversight or responsibility for the facility, that he leaves that up to the local Respiratory Therapists and the Director of Respiratory Therapy (DORT).
Interview on 2/9/2024 at 11:07 am, Administrator indicated there is a scheduled phone call with a technology company because the monitors were having issues. He stated he was not sure when the auditory alarms on the ventilators stopped working. During further interview, the Administrator stated he did not realize they were supposed to alarm in the hallways.
Interview on 2/12/2024 at 3:00 pm, Administrator stated he was not aware of the CO2 monitoring requirement until after reviewing the policies and procedures for requirements to operate a Mechanical Ventilator Unit. During further interview, he stated the facility will rent a CO2 monitoring device to perform every 30 minute CO2 checks for the ventilator residents and has ordered CO2 cables for the ventilator machines to be delivered overnight.
2. Administration failed to maintain emergency tracheostomy supplies at the bedside in the event of accidental dislodgement of trach tube.
Cross Refer F695
Observational tour on 2/9/2024 at 7:50 am, Registered Respiratory Therapist (RRT) AA revealed she was unable to locate emergency tracheostomy supplies at the bedside for three residents (R68, R70, and R76). She indicated there were some supplies in the supply closet but was unable to locate the appropriate trach sizes for the residents with tracheostomies. Surveyor accompanied RRT AA to a Respiratory Cart where she located some respiratory supplies (gauze, gloves, mask, suction, saline, and adapters), but cart did not have any tracheostomy tubes or obturators in it. RRT AA further revealed she had been employed in the facility since November 2023 and had not been informed regarding the need to have emergency trach supplies at each residents bedside.
Interview on 2/9/2024 at 10:00 am, Administrator indicated the facility had tracheostomy supplies in another supply building, and staff were looking for sizes to fit the resident's tracheostomies. Administrator stated he was reaching out to outside resources, from sister facilities or the local hospital, for emergency tracheostomies supplies needed for the residents.
Interview on 2/10/2024 at 9:15 am, the DORT stated staff located some tracheostomy supplies in resident rooms, and revealed there is a supply closet down the hall that has some stock items, and an outside building with extra tracheostomy supplies. He stated he was unsure why obturators were not kept at the bedside. During further interview, he stated the end tidal CO2 monitors had not been connected to the ventilators since his employment in June 2023,
3. Facility Administrator and Director of Respiratory Therapy failed to perform duties of their job descriptions that facilitated medical care to the residents of the facility.
4. Administration failed to implement care plan interventions that addressed emergency care and supplies at bedside for residents admitted with a tracheostomy.
Cross Refer F656
CRITICAL
(K)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Room Equipment
(Tag F0908)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of the Policies and Procedures for Nursing Facility Services, the f...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of the Policies and Procedures for Nursing Facility Services, the facility failed to ensure that ventilator machines had properly functioning heart rate and pulse oximetry alarms that were audible outside resident rooms. In addition, the facility failed to ensure end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) analyzers were implemented for measuring ETCO2 of ventilator residents This deficient practice affected six of six residents (R) (R281, RE, RF, R70, R68, R76) sampled for mechanical ventilators and CO2 monitors.
On February 9, 2024, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or had the likelihood to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents.
The facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on February 9, 2024, at 2:39 pm. The noncompliance related to the immediate jeopardy was identified to have existed on [DATE].
At the time of exit on [DATE], an acceptable Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan had not been received, therefore the Immediate Jeopardy remained ongoing.
Findings include:
Review of the document titled Part II - Policies and Procedures for Nursing Facility Services; Georgia Department of Community Health, Division of Medical Assistance dated [DATE], Chapter 800, Section 804: Mechanical Ventilation Services, 804.5 Nursing Facility Staffing, Equipment and Requirements revealed durable medical equipment and supplies to meet the needs of the ventilator-dependent resident to include but not be limited to: Number 2. Pulse oximetry monitors. Number 3. End tidal CO2 analyzers. Number 4. An audible, redundant external alarm system is located outside the patient room to alert caregivers of ventilator failure.
1. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R281 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, dependence on respirator status and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with exacerbation.
Review of the admission Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not scored and indicated resident is rarely/never understood. Section O revealed the resident received suctioning and invasive mechanical ventilator.
Review of the care plan initiated [DATE] documented the resident is ventilator dependent related to respiratory failure. Interventions to care include head of bed elevated unless providing care, maintain spare trach at bedside, maintain ventilator settings as ordered, monitor oxygen (O2) saturation while on mechanical ventilator support, observe for indications of tube obstruction.
Review of the [DATE] Order Summary Report revealed a ventilator order dated [DATE], with no settings identified.
Review of the Progress Note dated [DATE] at 11:45 am written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) HH documented writer called [hospital] and [resident] had expired.
Review of the Progress Note dated [DATE] at 4:00 am written by Registered Nurse (RN) MM documented duty nurse went to his room check on him founded{sic}that he was not taking any breath. Notified RT called 911 as he was fullcode {sic} started CPR. NO response noted. EMT here at 4:10 am, resident not responded to CPR and defibrillation, transferred to hospital 4:20 am. Notified duty oncall{sic}, failed to call his son via phone.
Review of the Progress Note dated [DATE] at 5:59 pm written by Registered Respiratory Therapist (RRT) AA documented Resident took himself off the vent. When I got in the room him {sic}saturation in the 80s. I placed him back on the vent and his saturation was still not increasing. He kept saying he could not breath. I lavaged {sic}suctioned him five times but there was no mucus plug. His O2 saturation started to finally increase back up to 95% once he calmed down.
Review of the Progress Note dated [DATE] at 1:30 pm revealed RRT CC documented, [resident] continues to take himself off the vent. Changed sat probe to wrap aroundfinge. {sic} Bagged with 100% O2. SXED. Given Rxs. Sedation given. Still active. Sat now 97 to 93. Rhonchi noted.
Review of the Progress Note dated [DATE] at 9:23 am written by LPN NN documented resident vent disconnected, reconnected, informed RT of findings.
Interview on [DATE] at 7:45 am, RRT AA confirmed R281 was ventilator dependent, with O2 saturation in the 98-100% range. She stated she was in the Respiratory Department when the nurse came in and stated, I think he is dead, blue, and I didn't hear the alarms. During continued interview, she revealed that no alarms were heard at that time. Upon arrival to the room, RRT AA stated she began bagging the resident, and CPR was started; 911 was called while staff were alternating doing CPR for effective compressions. RRT AA stated the saturation never recovered, nor did a pulse, and the resident was transferred to the hospital.
Interview on [DATE] at 6:30 pm, RRT CC stated he arrived in the R281 room to find he was blue and didn't have a heart rate. He stated that he began bagging the resident, but the O2 saturations were undetectable. He stated 911 was called, and the resident was transferred to the hospital, where he was pronounced dead.
Interview on [DATE] at 11:00 am, the Interim Administrator revealed he was aware of R281's history of pulling at his ventilator tubing. He stated the resident was moved closer to the nurse's station and the facility implemented increased documentation/rounding due to his history of pulling the ventilator tubing off.
Interview on [DATE] at 11:45 am, Director of Nursing (DON) stated she was unaware R281 needed increased monitoring, or documentation, and stated she was not aware the reason he was moved to another room was due to him pulling at the ventilator tubing. During further interview, she revealed she believed the reason he was moved was due to needing his room for an admission.
Interview on [DATE] at 12:45 pm, Director of Respiratory Tyherapy (DORT) stated that the respiratory ventilator checks went from every six to every four hours for R281. The DORT stated he was not aware of the resident being moved due to the frequently taking off his tubing from the tracheostomy.
2. Record review of the EMR revealed R E was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen), dependence on respirator status, and tracheostomy status (a surgical procedure to open a direct airway through an incision in the trachea [windpipe]).
Review of the Discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed BIMS was not scored and documented resident was unable to respond. There is no additional data available due to resident being discharged to acute hospital with anticipated return.
Review of the care plan for R E initiated on [DATE] documented resident is ventilator dependent related to respiratory failure. Interventions to care include head of bed elevated unless providing care, maintain spare trach at bedside, maintain ventilator settings as ordered, and suction as needed.
Review of the [DATE] Order Summary Report revealed ventilator orders dated [DATE] for CPAP+PS/PEEP 8/FIO2 50%.
Review of the Progress Note dated [DATE] at 4:56 am written by RRT OO documented RT observed resident was in respiratory distress. Sats were at 30% HR 121. RT immediately began to bag resident at 100% FI02. Additional staff arrived at the bedside. Resident became alert to verbal stimuli. Once Sats were at 95% resident was tried on the ventilator again, but immediately desatted {sic} to 87%. Resident was then bagged and EMT personal {sic} was called and transported without issue.
Interview on [DATE] at 9:34 am Nurse Practitioner (NP) reported that the ventilator alarms were not working in [DATE] when she first began working at the facility, but stated she doesn't remember when they started working again. The NP further revealed she is aware R E went out to the hospital a few weeks ago due to pulling off his ventilator.
Interview on [DATE] at 1:00 pm, the DON confirmed R E remained in the hospital, with bilateral pneumonia, septic shock, on an intravenous drip for hypotension and currently in the intensive care unit on the ventilator with an FIO2 of 60%.
3. Review of the EMR revealed R F was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including tracheostomy status, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia or hypercapnia, dependence on respirator status, and obstructive sleep apnea.
Review of the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 99 documenting resident is moderately impaired. Section O revealed the resident received oxygen therapy, suctioning, invasive mechanical ventilator, and tracheostomy care.
Review of the care plan initiated on [DATE] documented resident is ventilator dependent related to respiratory failure. Interventions to care include head of bed elevated, maintain spare trach at bedside, maintain ventilator settings as ordered, and routine trach change by respiratory care.
Review of the [DATE] Order Summary Report revealed ventilator orders dated [DATE] for day shift - PS [DATE], night shift - PS [DATE].
Resident was discharged from facility on [DATE].
4. Review of the EMR revealed R70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including tracheostomy status, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and dependence on respirator (ventilator) status.
Review of the Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed BIMS was coded as five, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Section O revealed the resident received oxygen therapy, suctioning, invasive mechanical ventilator, and tracheostomy care.
Review of the care plan initiated on [DATE] revealed the resident is ventilator dependent related to respiratory failure. Interventions to care include head of bed elevated unless providing care, maintain spare trach at bedside, maintain ventilator settings as ordered, and routine trach change by respiratory care.
Review of the February 2024 Order Summary Report revealed an order dated [DATE] for ventilator setting - SIMV 400ml, +5, rate 12.
Review of the Progress Note dated [DATE] at 9:04 am revealed RN EE documented Resident is trach/vent dependent.
Observation on [DATE] at 7:05 am revealed R70 lying supine in bed and is ventilator dependent. The ventilator is on with current settings as ordered, and the ventilator tubing has minimal condensation. A suction machine is at the bedside. Further observation revealed no audible alarms could be heard outside the resident's room, and there is not an end-tidal CO2 monitor measuring exhaled CO2. The ventilator monitor or pulse oximeter does not display a CO2 reading. These observations were confirmed by the RRT AA at the bedside.
Observation on [DATE] at 8:57 am, revealed lights above resident rooms do not indicate different distress codes. The DON and surveyor walked to the Nurse's Station to view the monitoring system. The RRT was in a resident room to test the alarm and monitoring system, and there was no change noted on the monitor, and no alarms heard, after the test was performed by the Therapist.
Interview on [DATE] at 8:57 am, the DON reported part of the problem is the monitoring is not indicating when there is an issue with the resident. She reported she is unsure when the system went out, but she has the staff making frequent rounds.
Phone interview on [DATE] at 10:44 am, Operations Respiratory Therapist (ORT) revealed he comes to the facility every couple of weeks and was not aware the alarms were not working. During further interview, he stated the facility has a call set up with the manufacturer of the alarm system to add more transmitters. He stated the system should pick up the receptors from the resident's room to the nurse station monitor and the one in the hall.
Observation on [DATE] at 9:00 am revealed R70 continues to lay supine in the bed dependent on ventilator support. Audible ventilator alarms are now heard outside the resident's room. Pulse oximeter is connected to the finger; however, there is no evidence that exhaled CO2 is being monitored.
Observation on [DATE] at 10:00 am revealed R70 is lying semi-Fowlers in the bed on the ventilator with suction equipment available at bedside. The ventilator audible alarms can be heard outside the resident's room. There is no evidence of ETCO2 being monitored.
Observation on [DATE] at 1:00 pm revealed R70's ventilator does not have the capability for end-tidal CO2 monitoring to measure exhaled CO2. The ventilator monitor or pulse oximeter does not display a CO2 reading.
Interview on [DATE] at 1:45 pm, the DORT verified the facility does not currently have the capability to monitor ventilator residents exhaled CO2 at this time. The DORT stated that he looked through the equipment in the respiratory department and found plastic adapters that appeared to fit some cables at one time.
5. Review of the EMR revealed R68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, including tracheostomy status, acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia (increased carbon dioxide), and dependence on respirator status.
Review of the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] BIMS was unscored and indicated severe cognitive impairment. Section O revealed the resident received suctioning, invasive mechanical ventilator, and non-invasive mechanical ventilator.
Review of the care plan dated [DATE] revealed the resident is ventilator dependent related to respiratory failure. Interventions to care include keep head of bed elevated unless providing care or patient request, maintain spare trach at bedside, maintain ventilator settings as ordered, and monitor tube for obstruction.
Review of February 2024 Order Summary Report revealed an order dated [DATE] for ventilator settings - [DATE].
Review of the Progress Note dated [DATE] at 10:47 am written by Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) documented Vent with weaning trials not successful at this time, trach with moderate suctioning required.
Observation on [DATE] at 8:05 am revealed R68 lying semi-Fowlers in the bed with ventilator connected to the resident's tracheostomy. The ventilator currently does not have the capability for the alarms to be heard outside the resident's room. RRT AA was in the residents room and confirmed the alarms were not audible. There is no evidence of CO2 monitoring at this time.
Observation on [DATE] at 9:20 am, the Administrator, LPN DD, and surveyor were standing at the nurse's station, located halfway down the hall, and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) BB was standing at the nurse's station when RRT AA went into a ventilated resident's room and made the alarm go off. None of the above-mentioned individuals could hear the alarm from where they were standing.
Observation on [DATE] at 9:15 am revealed R68 in bed lying supine. The ventilator alarms can be heard outside the resident's room today, but there is no CO2 monitoring at this time.
Observation on [DATE] at 8:30 am revealed that R68 continues to be ventilator dependent. There is no evidence of CO2 monitoring at this time.
Interview on [DATE] at 9:15 am, DORT revealed he has been employed since [DATE]. He stated the alarms for the ventilator have never worked. He stated the end tidal CO2 monitors had not been connected to the ventilators since his employment. He stated he thinks there are pieces to the monitor in the facility, but he is not sure exactly what is in the building.
6. Review of the EMR revealed R76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including tracheostomy status, respiratory failure unspecified whether hypoxia or hypercapnia, dependence on respirator status, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS was unscored the resident is rarely/never understood, staff assessment-severely impaired. Section O revealed the resident received suctioning and invasive mechanical ventilator.
Review of the care plan dated [DATE] revealed the resident is ventilator dependent related to respiratory failure. Interventions to care include maintain spare trach at bedside, maintain ventilator settings as ordered, monitor tube misplacement every two hours, and observe for indications of tube obstruction.
Review of February 2024 Order Summary Report revealed an order dated [DATE] ventilator settings PS 10/+[DATE]%.
Review of the Progress Note dated [DATE] at 9:01 am written by RN EE documented Excessive secretions noted, required oral/trach suction. Suctioning, trach/vent care done by Respiratory Therapist.
Observation on [DATE] at 8:30 am revealed R76 lying supine in her bed connected to a ventilator with minimal condensation visible in the tubing. Further observation revealed the ventilator alarms are not audible outside the resident's room and there is no evidence of CO2 monitoring. RRT AA was in the room and confirmed these findings.
Observation on [DATE] at 9:40 am revealed that R76 continues to be on a ventilator and connected to a pulse oximeter. The ventilator alarms were now able to be heard outside the resident's room.
Observation on [DATE] at 9:00 am revealed that R76's ventilator audible alarms can be heard outside the resident's room. There is no evidence of CO2 monitoring for R76.
Interview on [DATE] at 8:10 am, RRT AA revealed she has been employed at the facility since [DATE]. She stated the audible alarms for the ventilators have not worked since she has been employed, and further stated they do not alarm outside the resident rooms. During further interview, she stated staff can be in one room providing care for a resident, and if other staff are not in the hallway, a resident could be in distress in another room, when staff can't hear the alarms, places the residents at risk for death.
Interview on [DATE] at 10:56 am, Maintenance Director revealed he didn't know the monitors were not alarming. He reported he made an adjustment to one of the ventilators, and it is now working. He revealed testing the alarms is not a part of his regular monitoring of the machines, and only tests them as problems arise. During further interview, the Maintenance Director stated he does not log any information about maintenance of the machines/alarms. He denies he has received any training for the alarm system.
Interview on [DATE] at 1:30 pm, DON revealed her expectation was for all the staff working on the ventilator unit to be up to date with education. The DON further stated she has shown each staff member where the cables are for the ventilators, instructed them not to turn the volume down, and to contact herself or the Administrator if there are any issues.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, and review of the policy titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident Care Items and Equipment, the facility failed to ensure that it maintained a clean and comforta...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and review of the policy titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident Care Items and Equipment, the facility failed to ensure that it maintained a clean and comfortable home-like environment for two of 30 sampled residents (R) (R54 and R63). Specifically, the facility failed to upkeep the cleanliness of resident wheelchairs related to dirt and hair build up.
Findings:
Review of the policy titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident Care Items and Equipment revised July 2014, revealed the policy is resident care equipment, including reusable items and durable medical equipment will be cleaned and disinfected according to current CDC recommendations for disinfection and the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogen Standard.
Observation on 2/10/2024 at 12:15 pm revealed a thick gray buildup and hair on the undercarriage of the wheelchair for R63.
Observation on 2/10/2024 at 1:34 pm revealed R54 sitting in her wheelchair near the front nurse's station. There was a thick gray build-up noted to the wheel spokes and undercarriage of the wheelchair.
Interview on 2/11/2024 at 11:17 am, the Maintenance Director stated resident wheelchairs should be cleaned monthly. He reported that night shift staff have washed wheelchairs before, but the Director of Nursing (DON) may be able to provide more information on the schedule.
Interview 2/11/2024 at 11:25 am, DON reported that nursing and housekeeping staff are responsible for cleaning resident wheelchairs. During further interview, she indicated that a certain number of wheelchairs should be cleaned weekly on the night shift, but she was unsure of the specific number or which wheelchairs were to be cleaned.
During a brief walking tour on 2/11/2024 beginning at 11:26 am, the DON confirmed R63 was observed sitting in her wheelchair with hair, dirt, and thick gray buildup on the undercarriage of her wheelchair; and R54 was observed sitting in her wheelchair in the hallway with thick gray buildup and dirt on the undercarriage and wheel spokes of her wheelchair.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from potential accident hazards by n...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from potential accident hazards by not ensuring that a portable oxygen tank was stored securely in resident (R) 233's room of 43 resident rooms.
Findings include:
Review of medical record revealed R233 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but was not limited to chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Observation on 2/9/2024 at 3:35 pm, in R233's room was a free-standing portable oxygen tank sitting unsecured on the floor, near the wall by the television.
Observation on 2/9/2024 at 3:55 pm, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) LL exited room of R233.
During an observation and interview on 2/9/2024 at 3:59 pm, LPN KK confirmed the oxygen tank in R233's room was unsecured. She acknowledged that the oxygen tank should not have been sitting directly on the floor and then removed the oxygen tank from the room.
Interview on 2/9/2024 at 4:00 pm, LPN LL stated that she had just exited R233's room but denied that she saw the unsecured oxygen tank sitting on the floor.
Interview on 2/11/2024 at 3:43 pm, the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator both denied knowledge of portable oxygen tanks sitting unsecured in any residents' rooms. The DON stated that the portable oxygen tanks should sit in a stand.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the policy titled Antipsychotic Medication Use, the facility failed to en...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the policy titled Antipsychotic Medication Use, the facility failed to ensure that psychotropic medications including antianxiety medications were not ordered as needed (PRN) beyond 14 days unless clinically indicated
for two of five residents (R) (R8 and R38) reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Findings are:
Review of the policy titled Antipsychotic Medication Use revised 12/2016, revealed Policy Interpretation and Implementation: Number 15. as needed (PRN) psychotropics medications would not be utilized beyond 14 days unless the healthcare practitioner provided a documented rationale for the extended order and had evaluated the resident for the appropriateness of that medication.
1. Review of the clinical record revealed R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, congestive heart failure (CHF), hypertension (HTN), hypothyroidism, and anxiety disorder.
Review of the Physician Orders (PO) dated 1/18/2023 revealed an order for alprazolam (a medication used to treat anxiety) 0.5 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed (PRN). Further review of the PO did not indicate that the use of the PRN medication had been re-evaluated by the physician for continued use. The order had no end date.
Review of R8's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for January 2024, revealed as needed alprazolam was administered 11 times and February 2024, revealed as needed alprazolam was administered 5 times.
2. Review of the clinical record revealed R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, urinary retention, dysphagia, gout, hypertension (HTN), and anxiety disorder.
Review of the Physician Orders (PO) dated 12/22/2023 revealed an order for lorazepam (a medication used to treat anxiety) 1 mg/milliliter (ml) every 4 hours as needed (PRN). Further review of the PO did not indicate that the use of the PRN medication had been re-evaluated by the physician for continued use. The order had no end date.
Review of R38's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for December 2023 revealed PRN lorazepam was administered eight times; January 2024 PRN lorazepam was administered 20 times, and February 2024, revealed PRN lorazepam was administered three times.
Interview on 2/10/2024 at 12:11 pm, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that all psychotropic medications were supposed to have a 14-day stop date. The DON acknowledged there was no stop date for R38s alprazolam and R8s Lorazepam. She stated she was responsible for chart audits to ensure stop-dates were in place, and she stated this was an oversight.
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to have a hands-free trash receptacle at the hand washing sink, failed to ensure the exhaust hood fi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to have a hands-free trash receptacle at the hand washing sink, failed to ensure the exhaust hood filters were clean and free from grease build-up, and failed to properly label and date opened food items. These failures had the potential to affect 69 residents receiving an oral diet.
Findings include:
1. Observation on 2/9/2024 at 9:45 am during the initial tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager (DM), revealed the hand washing sink near the main entrance to the kitchen, adjacent to the dish room, revealed the only trash receptable available to dispose of used paper towels was a large 50-gallon trash can covered with a lid. Continued observation revealed the DM lifting the dirty trash bin lid to dispose of a used paper towel.
Interview on 2/9/2024 at 9:45 am, the DM confirmed that the only trash receptacle near the hand washing sink near the main entrance to the kitchen, was a 50-gallon trash can covered with lid, and the lid would need to be touched in order to dispose of used paper towels. The DM could not explain why a hands-free trash bin was not available at the hand washing sink.
2. Observation on 2/9/2024 at 9:48 am, the exhaust hood filters revealed a layer of grease build-up. The exhaust hood was above a four-burner stove and free-standing oven.
Interview on 2/9/2024 at 9:48 am, the DM confirmed that there was grease build-up on the exhaust hood filters. She stated that the dietary department recently became responsible for cleaning the filters. She stated maintenance had been cleaning them every two weeks. During further interview, the DM stated that the exhaust hood is scheduled to be cleaned this weekend.
Interview on 2/11/2024 at 1:30 pm, the Maintenance Director stated that he is ultimately responsible for cleaning the exhaust hood filters in the kitchen. He stated that the filters should be cleaned at least once a week, and confirmed they have not been cleaned. He stated that he does not keep a log of when the filters had been cleaned. During further interview, the Maintenance Director revealed that he prefers to clean the hood filters himself, due to the need to use a ladder to remove the filters. He stated he does not want to place anyone at risk of falling.
3. Review of the policy titled Food Storage: Dry Goods revised 2/2023, revealed storage areas will be neat, arranged for easy identification, and date marked as appropriate.
Review of the policy titled Food Storage: Cold Foods revised 2/2023, revealed all foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination.
Observation on 2/9/2024 at 9:56 am, during the initial tour of the kitchen, inside the two-door stand up refrigerator revealed a clear plastic container containing Mixed Fruit labeled on the top lid with a date of 1/30/2024. There was also a rectangle shaped steam table pan containing cheese sauce that had a label stating Cheddar Cheese dated 1/28/2024.
Interview on 2/9/2024 at 9:56 am, the DM verified the container with the mixed fruit was dated 1/30/2024. She stated that the date on the mixed fruit was wrong, that the fruit was just placed in the container yesterday. The DM confirmed that the pan containing the cheddar cheese sauce was dated 1/28/2024. The DM stated that she thought the discard date for the cheese sauce should be the same as that for shredded cheese, which is to discard three to four weeks after opening.
Observation on 2/9/2024 at 10:05 am, in the dry storage area revealed three large clear plastic containers on a shelf containing elbow macaroni, rigatoni noodles, and rice that had no label or open date on them. Further observation revealed a large white plastic bin with wheels containing sugar with no label or open date.
Interview on 2/9/2024 at 10:05 am, the DM confirmed that the pasta and rice containers had no label or open date on them. She stated that she expects the dietary staff to label and date food items once taken out of the package and placed in a container. The DM confirmed that the white plastic bin containing sugar had no label or open date on it. During further interview, the DM stated that she does not expect staff to date the sugar bin once the sugar has been taken out of the original package. She stated the sugar bin is cleaned once per month and stated that is when new sugar is placed. The DM verified the last documented date for cleaning the sugar bin was 6/13/2023.
Observation on 2/9/2024 at 10:10 am, the outside building with kitchen refrigeration and freezer storage revealed a two door stand up freezer next to the milk chest refrigeration, had a white frosted plastic bag containing a white circular food item with no label or date.
Interview on 2/9/2024 at 10:10 am, DM confirmed the white frosted plastic bag with the circular food item did not have a label or date om it. She stated the dietary staff should have placed a label and dated the product before storing the food item.
Observation on 2/11/2024 at 9:20 am, the two-door stand up refrigerator inside the kitchen revealed a clear plastic circulator container containing two bags of opened shredded cheese. Continued observation revealed the label on the top lid stated Mixed Fruit 2/8/2024.
Interview on 2/11/2024 at 9:20 am, the DM confirmed that the lid to the container storing opened bags of shredded cheese was labeled Mixed Fruit and dated 2/8/2024. The DM stated the dietary staff failed to remove a previous label from the container lid, and she expects staff to place appropriate labels on the containers.
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, review of the Policies and Procedures for Nursing Facility Services, and review of the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, review of the Policies and Procedures for Nursing Facility Services, and review of the policy titled Healthcare Management-Legionella Infection Control, the facility failed to develop and implement a water management plan to include policies and procedures for the prevention and spread of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in the building water system. In addition, the facility failed to designate a clean and dirty room on the ventilator unit to reduce the cross contamination of respiratory therapy equipment. The census was 93.
Findings include:
Review of the document titled Healthcare Management-Legionella Infection Control dated 7/22/2021 revealed Legionella bacteria is found in [NAME] environment. The bacteria can become a health concern when it grows in building water systems such as:
o
Shower heads and sink faucets.
o
Cooling towers found in centralized air- cooling systems.
o
Decorative fountains
o
Hot water tanks and heaters.
o
Large complex plumbing systems.
o
Medical equipment such as a C- PAP machine.
The facility will implement a water management program to reduce the building's risk for growing and spreading Legionella. Elements of a water management program are to:
o
Establish a water management program team. The team should include someone who understands
accreditation standards and licensing requirements. The infection control person, a clinician with expertise in
infectious diseases. Risk management
o
Describe the building water systems using text and floor diagrams. Be sure to include descriptions of water
sources relevant to patient care areas, Clinical support areas, and components and devices that can expose
patients to contaminated water.
o
Identify areas where Legionella could grow and spread. Prevent any water stagnation.
o
Decide the way control measures should be applied and how to monitor them. Control measures and limits
should be established for each control point. And measure your control points weekly. Water should be
measured throughout the system to ensure that changes that may lead to Legionella growth are not occurring.
o
Water heaters should be maintained at an appropriate temperature. (Equal or greater to 124 degrees).
o
Decorative fountains should be kept free and clear of debris, including biofilm.
o
Disinfectant and other chemical levels in coolant towers and hot tubs should be continuously maintained and
monitored.
o
Establish ways to intervene when control limits are not met. You should also develop an ongoing dialogue
with your drinking water provider so that you are aware of changes that may affect your building's water
supply.
o
Make sure the program is running as designed and is effective. Document and communicate all the activities.
1. The facility could not provide any documentation regarding the water management plan, including an assessment for the identification of where Legionella could grow and spread or measures to prevent the growth of opportunistic waterborne pathogens, and how to monitor.
Review of the daily water temperature logs provided by the Maintenance Director revealed there were no temperatures logged for the months of January 2023 through January 2024. The facility did not have a log for flushing water lines in areas that had increased risk for the growth of Legionella.
Interview on 2/10/2022 at 9:40 am, the Maintenance Director revealed he checks the water temperature in resident rooms monthly. He presented a book titled [facility name] Treatment that had pictures of a temperature stick dated 2/10/2024. There were no other dates or pictures of temperatures in the [facility name] Treatment book. The Maintenane Director was asked for the policy and procedures for measures to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in the building water systems, and he reported it should all be in the book. He confirmed there was no plan in place for prevention of Legionella or other bloodborne pathogens in the [facility name] Treatment Book.
2. Review of the document titled Part II - Policies and Procedures for Nursing Facility Services; Georgia Department of Community Health, Division of Medical Assistance dated July 1, 2014, Chapter 800, Section 804: Mechanical Ventilation Services, 804.5 Nursing Facility Staffing, Equipment and Requirements revealed in order to maintain quality standards and reduce cross contamination, the facility policy and procedure for cleaning and maintaining equipment must include a designated soiled utility room which will be used to clean soiled Respiratory Therapy equipment, as well as a separate area to store clean equipment. The ventilator unit must have a designated clean and dirty room. This area may not be a mixed use area. It must be separated from storage and or office space.
Observation on 2/9/2024 at 11:53 am of the ventilator unit revealed the facility does not have a dirty and clean room for disinfecting and cleaning equipment. Observation of dirty respiratory equipment is the respiratory office.
Interview on 2/9/2024 at 1:30 pm, Registered Respiratory Therapist (RRT) AA indicated the dirty equipment from the ventilator unit is brought into the respiratory department to be cleaned, and then taken back out for use. During further interview, RRT AA revealed there was not a separate door to take the cleaning equipment from the department, back on the unit. She stated the room in the respiratory department was used by all the staff.
Interview on 2/9/2024 at 1:00 pm, Administrator stated the respiratory equipment was cleaned in the respiratory department, on the opposite side of the room. He confirmed there was only one entrance to the room to bring the dirty equipment in and to take clean equipment out.
Interview on 2/10/2024 at 12:30 pm, Director of Respiratory Therapy (DORT) stated the dirty respiratory equipment was now being covered with a plastic bag and moved from the vent unit through the hall to a room designated for cleaning. He stated the room still does not have a separate dirty and clean side.