WESTWOOD HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Westwood Healthcare and Rehabilitation in Statesboro, Georgia has a Trust Grade of C+, which means it is considered decent and slightly above average. Ranking #171 out of 353 facilities in Georgia places it in the top half, while being #1 out of 2 in Bryan County indicates it is the best option locally. However, the facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with issues increasing from 3 in 2023 to 6 in 2025. Staffing is a mixed bag with a rating of 2 stars out of 5 and a turnover rate of 42%, which is better than the state average but still below optimal. Recent inspections revealed concerning practices, including a failure to properly manage infection control protocols, which could increase the risk of spreading infections among residents, and an unsanitary environment in some living areas, posing potential health risks. Overall, while there are strengths in its ranking and staffing retention, families should be aware of the significant concerns regarding infection control and cleanliness.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Georgia
- #171/353
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 42% turnover. Near Georgia's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $3,728 in fines. Higher than 67% of Georgia facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 32 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Georgia. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 15 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (42%)
6 points below Georgia average of 48%
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Georgia average (2.6)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Georgia avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 15 deficiencies on record
May 2025
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0628
(Tag F0628)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on resident and staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policies titled Bed Hold Notice and Transfe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. Review of 13's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 4/22/2025, revealed Section J (Health Conditions) documented that the resident exhibited shortness of breath. Section O (Special Treatments, Procedure...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Accident and Super...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to ensure that the physician's order for oxygen administr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0740
(Tag F0740)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Behavioral Health Services, the facility failed to ensure one of 25 sampled residents (R) (R306) received behavioral ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Preventative Maintenance Program, the facility...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program the facility f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0887
(Tag F0887)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program the facility ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2021
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and resident/staff interviews, the facility failed to allow one of 20 sampled residents (R)...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policy titled Detailed Cleaning, the facility failed to ensure t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, review of facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, and staff inte...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received oxygen at the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, review of facility policy titled Visitation and Infection Control, and staff interviews, the facility fai...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0882
(Tag F0882)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on staff interviews and review of facility policy titled Visitation and Infection Control Policy, the facility failed to designate a qualified infection preventionist who completed specialized t...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • $3,728 in fines. Lower than most Georgia facilities. Relatively clean record.
- • 42% turnover. Below Georgia's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 15 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Westwood Healthcare And Rehabilitation's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns WESTWOOD HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Georgia, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Westwood Healthcare And Rehabilitation Staffed?
CMS rates WESTWOOD HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 42%, compared to the Georgia average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Westwood Healthcare And Rehabilitation?
State health inspectors documented 15 deficiencies at WESTWOOD HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION during 2021 to 2025. These included: 15 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Westwood Healthcare And Rehabilitation?
WESTWOOD HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 60 certified beds and approximately 55 residents (about 92% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in STATESBORO, Georgia.
How Does Westwood Healthcare And Rehabilitation Compare to Other Georgia Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Georgia, WESTWOOD HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (42%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Westwood Healthcare And Rehabilitation?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Westwood Healthcare And Rehabilitation Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, WESTWOOD HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Georgia. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Westwood Healthcare And Rehabilitation Stick Around?
WESTWOOD HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION has a staff turnover rate of 42%, which is about average for Georgia nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Westwood Healthcare And Rehabilitation Ever Fined?
WESTWOOD HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION has been fined $3,728 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Georgia average of $33,116. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Westwood Healthcare And Rehabilitation on Any Federal Watch List?
WESTWOOD HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.