PRUITTHEALTH - WASHINGTON
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
PruittHealth - Washington has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice for families seeking care for their loved ones. It ranks #158 out of 353 facilities in Georgia, placing it in the top half of the state, and it is the only option in Wilkes County, ranked #1. The facility's inspection trend is new, with its first inspection showing four concerns, none of which were life-threatening but indicate potential harm. Staffing received a poor rating of 1 out of 5 stars, though the turnover rate is 44%, which is below the state average of 47%, meaning some staff do stay long-term. Notably, there were no fines reported, which is positive, but there are issues such as the ice machine not being cleaned properly, posing a risk of illness, and air conditioning units in some resident rooms not being maintained, which could affect comfort.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Georgia
- #158/353
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Too New
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 44% turnover. Near Georgia's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Georgia facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 21 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Georgia. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ✓ Good
- Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (44%)
4 points below Georgia average of 48%
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Georgia average (2.6)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Georgia avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 4 deficiencies on record
Nov 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of facility's policy titled Care Plans, the facility failed to follow a care plan for one of two residents (R) R42 reviewed for oxyge...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration, the fa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Packaged Terminal Air Conditioners (PTAC) were main...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Cleaning Schedule Policy, the f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Georgia facilities.
- • Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
- • 44% turnover. Below Georgia's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • No major red flags. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.
About This Facility
What is Pruitthealth - Washington's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns PRUITTHEALTH - WASHINGTON an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Georgia, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Pruitthealth - Washington Staffed?
CMS rates PRUITTHEALTH - WASHINGTON's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 44%, compared to the Georgia average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care. RN turnover specifically is 67%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Pruitthealth - Washington?
State health inspectors documented 4 deficiencies at PRUITTHEALTH - WASHINGTON during 2024. These included: 4 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Pruitthealth - Washington?
PRUITTHEALTH - WASHINGTON is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by PRUITTHEALTH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 47 certified beds and approximately 45 residents (about 96% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in WASHINGTON, Georgia.
How Does Pruitthealth - Washington Compare to Other Georgia Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Georgia, PRUITTHEALTH - WASHINGTON's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (44%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Pruitthealth - Washington?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Pruitthealth - Washington Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, PRUITTHEALTH - WASHINGTON has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Georgia. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Pruitthealth - Washington Stick Around?
PRUITTHEALTH - WASHINGTON has a staff turnover rate of 44%, which is about average for Georgia nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Pruitthealth - Washington Ever Fined?
PRUITTHEALTH - WASHINGTON has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Pruitthealth - Washington on Any Federal Watch List?
PRUITTHEALTH - WASHINGTON is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.