WINDER CENTER FOR NURSING AND HEALING
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Winder Center for Nursing and Healing has a Trust Grade of F, indicating poor performance with significant concerns for resident care. Ranking #350 out of 353 facilities in Georgia places it in the bottom tier, and it is the only nursing home in Barrow County. The facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with the number of issues increasing from 3 in 2022 to 6 in 2024. Staffing ratings are low with a turnover rate of 57%, which is above the state average, suggesting difficulties in maintaining experienced staff. Additionally, the facility has incurred $31,595 in fines, which is higher than 82% of Georgia facilities, reflecting ongoing compliance problems. Specific incidents include a failure to follow care plans for skin assessments, which could lead to serious injury, and not providing CPR for a resident who required it, resulting in a fatal outcome. Overall, while the facility has some average quality measures, the concerning issues and recent critical findings raise serious alarms about the level of care provided.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Georgia
- #350/353
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 57% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $31,595 in fines. Higher than 53% of Georgia facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 17 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Georgia. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Georgia average (2.6)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
11pts above Georgia avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Below median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
9 points above Georgia average of 48%
The Ugly 11 deficiencies on record
Oct 2024
6 deficiencies
2 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of facility policy titled Care Plan, Comprehensive Person-Centered, and staff interviews, the fac...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, review of facility policy titled Pressure Injury Prevention and Management, and staff inte...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the advanced directive was documented ac...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) (Form CMS-10123), and facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Ad...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on closed records review, interviews, and review of facility policy titled Blood Glucose Monitoring, the facility failed t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0691
(Tag F0691)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff/resident interviews, record review and review of the facility policy titled Ostomy Care-Colostomy, Urostomy and I...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2022
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0678
(Tag F0678)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews, and review of the policy titled Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) the facility failed to h...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident's dignity was ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions of the kitchen equipment including the ice maker, interior sides of the beverage cooler, mixer...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2019
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff and resident interview the facility failed to report an alleged violation involving verbal abuse b...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the microwave was clean and that all items in the resident pantry and the pantry refrigerator were labeled and dated on two (U...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 life-threatening violation(s), $31,595 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 11 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $31,595 in fines. Higher than 94% of Georgia facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade F (4/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Winder Center For Nursing And Healing's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns WINDER CENTER FOR NURSING AND HEALING an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Georgia, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Winder Center For Nursing And Healing Staffed?
CMS rates WINDER CENTER FOR NURSING AND HEALING's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 57%, which is 11 percentage points above the Georgia average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 71%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Winder Center For Nursing And Healing?
State health inspectors documented 11 deficiencies at WINDER CENTER FOR NURSING AND HEALING during 2019 to 2024. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 8 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Winder Center For Nursing And Healing?
WINDER CENTER FOR NURSING AND HEALING is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by EMPIRE CARE CENTERS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 163 certified beds and approximately 145 residents (about 89% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in WINDER, Georgia.
How Does Winder Center For Nursing And Healing Compare to Other Georgia Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Georgia, WINDER CENTER FOR NURSING AND HEALING's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (57%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Winder Center For Nursing And Healing?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Winder Center For Nursing And Healing Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, WINDER CENTER FOR NURSING AND HEALING has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Georgia. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Winder Center For Nursing And Healing Stick Around?
Staff turnover at WINDER CENTER FOR NURSING AND HEALING is high. At 57%, the facility is 11 percentage points above the Georgia average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 71%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Winder Center For Nursing And Healing Ever Fined?
WINDER CENTER FOR NURSING AND HEALING has been fined $31,595 across 3 penalty actions. This is below the Georgia average of $33,395. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Winder Center For Nursing And Healing on Any Federal Watch List?
WINDER CENTER FOR NURSING AND HEALING is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.