BARRY HEALTHCARE & SR LIVING
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Barry Healthcare & Senior Living has received a Trust Grade of F, which indicates significant concerns about the facility's overall quality and care. With a state rank of #465 out of 665 in Illinois, they are in the bottom half of facilities, and only one other option is available in Pike County. Although the facility's trend is improving, having reduced issues from 12 in 2023 to 1 in 2025, there are still serious concerns, including $161,668 in fines, which is higher than 88% of Illinois facilities, suggesting recurring compliance problems. Staffing is a significant issue, with a low 1-star rating and a troubling 68% turnover rate, indicating that staff frequently leave. Some serious incidents have been reported, including a failure to obtain physician orders for a resident experiencing mouth sores and nausea, leading to delayed treatment, and a case of resident-to-resident sexual abuse that was not prevented, causing significant distress to one resident. Overall, while there have been some improvements, families should weigh these concerning factors when considering care.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Illinois
- #465/665
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 68% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $161,668 in fines. Higher than 79% of Illinois facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 15 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 19 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Illinois average (2.5)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
22pts above Illinois avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Well above median ($33,413)
Significant penalties indicating serious issues
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
20 points above Illinois average of 48%
The Ugly 19 deficiencies on record
Mar 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to administer medications per physician's orders for 4 of...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2023
8 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Deficiency Text Not Available
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain Physician Orders for a change of condition for 1 of 15 residents (R150) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 4...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to supervise to prevent injury while smoking and elopement for 2 of 17...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents maintain current level of urinary continency and receive timely treatment for urinary tract infections (UTI) for 2 of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to meet the needs of the re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. On 12/4/23 at 10:25 AM, R24 was standing next to her dresser in her room, and she had two 1-ounce medication cups sitting on ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to securely seal, date and label refrigerated and frozen food. This failure has the ability to affect all 52 residents residing i...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Antibiotic Stewardship
(Tag F0881)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place to assess for efficacy of antibiotic use. This failure has the potential to affect all 52 residents liv...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's rights in 1 of 7 residents (R5) rev...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, continued weight loss in 2 of 4 residents (R6, R8) revie...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0808
(Tag F0808)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide a Therapeutic Diet as ordered by the Physician...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to supply a sufficient number of staff, Certified Nursing...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2022
4 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident sexual abuse for 2 of 6 residents (R41...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for 2 of 13 residents (R41 and R206) reviewed for abuse investigations in the sample of 23.
...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer treatments per physician's orde...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** R38's Face Sheet, undated, documents R38 has a diagnoses of Vascular Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder and Anxiety Disorder.
R...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2021
2 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent falls, investigate falls and to iden...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
On 11/15/2021 at 8:20AM, entrance to facility, staff are observed to be wearing surgical masks and no eye protection. The COVID-19 data tracker documents the community transmission rate for Pike count...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 4 harm violation(s), $161,668 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 19 deficiencies on record, including 4 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $161,668 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (5/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Barry Healthcare & Sr Living's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns BARRY HEALTHCARE & SR LIVING an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Barry Healthcare & Sr Living Staffed?
CMS rates BARRY HEALTHCARE & SR LIVING's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 68%, which is 22 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 67%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Barry Healthcare & Sr Living?
State health inspectors documented 19 deficiencies at BARRY HEALTHCARE & SR LIVING during 2021 to 2025. These included: 4 that caused actual resident harm and 15 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Barry Healthcare & Sr Living?
BARRY HEALTHCARE & SR LIVING is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by POINTE MANAGEMENT, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 76 certified beds and approximately 55 residents (about 72% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in BARRY, Illinois.
How Does Barry Healthcare & Sr Living Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, BARRY HEALTHCARE & SR LIVING's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (68%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Barry Healthcare & Sr Living?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Barry Healthcare & Sr Living Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, BARRY HEALTHCARE & SR LIVING has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Barry Healthcare & Sr Living Stick Around?
Staff turnover at BARRY HEALTHCARE & SR LIVING is high. At 68%, the facility is 22 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 67%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Barry Healthcare & Sr Living Ever Fined?
BARRY HEALTHCARE & SR LIVING has been fined $161,668 across 2 penalty actions. This is 4.7x the Illinois average of $34,696. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.
Is Barry Healthcare & Sr Living on Any Federal Watch List?
BARRY HEALTHCARE & SR LIVING is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.