COULTERVILLE REHAB & HCC
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Coulterville Rehab & HCC has a Trust Grade of B, which means it is a good choice for families seeking care, indicating a solid performance overall. It ranks #132 out of 665 nursing homes in Illinois, placing it in the top half of facilities in the state, and #1 out of 3 in Randolph County, showing it is the best local option. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 7 in 2023 to just 2 in 2024, although current staffing ratings are below average at 2 out of 5 stars and the turnover rate is at 50%, which is average for Illinois. While there have been no fines reported, which is a positive sign, some specific incidents of concern include one case where a resident with a history of falling was not adequately monitored and a failure to ensure that the dish machine met sanitation requirements, which could affect all residents. Overall, while there are strengths in its good trust grade and lack of fines, families should consider the staffing issues and recent incidents when making their decision.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Illinois
- #132/665
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 50% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 29 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ○ Average
- 9 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Illinois avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 9 deficiencies on record
Aug 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow the Renal Therapeutic Diet for 1 of 2 residents (R32) reviewe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure the dish machine had the chemical level required for effective sanitation and failed to store food in accordance with ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2023
7 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent falls for 1 of 3 residents (...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse for 1 of 3 residents (...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Antibiotic Stewardship
(Tag F0881)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who require antibiotics are prescribed the appropriate antibiotics to treat infections for 4 of 4 residents (R11, R41...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents and/or resident's representatives education on th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) in the facility for 8 hours daily. This has the potential to affect all 70 residents living in the facility.
Fi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in a manner that prevents foodborne illness. This has the potential to affect all 70 resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** A. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify causative organisms to assist with identification of pa...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- • 9 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Coulterville Rehab & Hcc's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns COULTERVILLE REHAB & HCC an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Coulterville Rehab & Hcc Staffed?
CMS rates COULTERVILLE REHAB & HCC's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 50%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Coulterville Rehab & Hcc?
State health inspectors documented 9 deficiencies at COULTERVILLE REHAB & HCC during 2023 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 8 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Coulterville Rehab & Hcc?
COULTERVILLE REHAB & HCC is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by TUTERA SENIOR LIVING & HEALTH CARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 75 certified beds and approximately 69 residents (about 92% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in COULTERVILLE, Illinois.
How Does Coulterville Rehab & Hcc Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, COULTERVILLE REHAB & HCC's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (50%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Coulterville Rehab & Hcc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Coulterville Rehab & Hcc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, COULTERVILLE REHAB & HCC has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Coulterville Rehab & Hcc Stick Around?
COULTERVILLE REHAB & HCC has a staff turnover rate of 50%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Coulterville Rehab & Hcc Ever Fined?
COULTERVILLE REHAB & HCC has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Coulterville Rehab & Hcc on Any Federal Watch List?
COULTERVILLE REHAB & HCC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.