DUQUOIN NURSING & REHAB

514 EAST JACKSON ST, DU QUOIN, IL 62832 (618) 542-4731
For profit - Limited Liability company 72 Beds WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
13/100
#505 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: August 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Du Quoin Nursing & Rehab has a Trust Grade of F, indicating poor performance and significant concerns about care quality. It ranks #505 out of 665 facilities in Illinois, placing it in the bottom half, and is #2 out of 3 in Perry County, meaning only one local option is better. The facility's trend is stable, with 7 issues reported each year since 2024. Staffing is a concern, rated at 1 out of 5 stars with a troubling 100% turnover rate, which is significantly higher than the state average. While they have not incurred any fines, which is a positive aspect, the RN coverage is less than that of 77% of facilities in the state, raising questions about the adequacy of nursing oversight. There are serious weaknesses in care, including a critical incident where a cognitively impaired resident left the facility unsupervised for over two hours before being found by police, highlighting gaps in supervision. Additionally, another resident suffered a hip fracture due to being given unnecessary psychotropic medications, indicating a failure to manage medication properly. There have also been concerns about food safety practices, such as improper sanitizer levels in the dish machine and contamination risks in food storage. Overall, while the absence of fines is a positive note, significant care deficiencies and high staff turnover present serious concerns for families considering this nursing home.

Trust Score
F
13/100
In Illinois
#505/665
Bottom 25%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Holding Steady
7 → 7 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
100% turnover. Very high, 52 points above average. Constant new faces learning your loved one's needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 25 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
22 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★★★☆☆
3.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 7 issues
2025: 7 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Illinois average (2.5)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 100%

53pts above Illinois avg (47%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Chain: WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is very high (100%)

52 points above Illinois average of 48%

The Ugly 22 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening 1 actual harm
Jul 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0605 (Tag F0605)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for medications in a sample of 3. Th...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for medications in a sample of 3. The findings include:R3's admission Record documents an admission date of 6/30/2023 and includes but not limited to diagnoses of Chronic Eosinophilic Pneumonia, Pneumonitis due to Inhalation of Food and Vomit, Unsteadiness on Feet, Unspecified Dementia, Hypomagnesium, Generalized Epilepsy, Anxiety, and Parkinson's disease. MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 6/6/2025 includes documents R3 is rarely understood and is severely impaired. Section GG documents R3 is dependent on staff for transfers and showers and requires substantial/maximum assistance for lower body dressing and putting on and taking off footwear. Section E-Behaviors documents R3 has no hallucinations or delusions, and that R3 has physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others with behaviors of this type 4 to 6 days, but less than daily. R3 has no behaviors exhibited for rejection of care or wandering.R3's care plan documents focus potential for behaviors: resident to resident inappropriate touching, date initiated 5/7/2025. Goal is to decrease risk of behaviors dated 5/7/2025 with target date of 8/14/2025. Interventions/tasks include but not limited to 1:1 activity with be increased, as well as keeping him engaged in meaningful activities, medication review will be completed and referral to be made to geriatric behavioral unit for evaluation dated 5/7/2025, medications as ordered, observe behaviors and try to determine cause.R3's Progress Note dated 7/16/2025 at 2:19PM documents resident is unable to follow commands, use of accessory muscles to breathe, pupils pinpoint, increased lethargy, EMS (Emergency Medical Services) in facility at this time, transport directly to local hospital. Authored by V6 (Registered Nurse/RN). R3's Progress note Late Entry, 7/19/2025 at 1:55PM documents, resident returned to facility today. He has suffered noticeable change in level of consciousness, resident is not responding to verbal stimuli per his normal baseline, he is showing outward signs of distress, moaning, and writhing in bed. Power of Attorney (POA) and son are considering placing resident in hospice care, wife seems resistant and asks me when will he get better. Authored by V6.R3's admission Summary note on 7/21/2025 at 2:58PM documents, resident returned to facility on July 18th, 2025. Medication changes were made per hospitalist. Orders were not updated in computer by nurse on duty. Pharmacy called today questioning two antibiotics what were pulled from E-Kit. Upon further investigations, orders changed from hospital and were not updated in the system. Per V2 (Director of Nursing), we will update orders now and contact pharmacy. Authored by V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN).R3's Discharge Information for Receiving Facility with print date of 7/18/2025 at 8:52AM documents New Medications, included Haloperidol 5mg every 8 hours PRN (as needed) for a diagnosis of Hospice Care. R3's facility Order Summary Report, with a print date of 7/22/25 at 12:24PM, documents an order for Haloperidol oral tablet 5mg give 1 tablet every 8 hours for agitation related to unspecified dementia, severe, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety with an order date of 7/21/25 and a start date of 7/22/25.R3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 7/1/2025 -7/31/2025 documents Haloperidol 5mg every 8 hours for agitation related to unspecified dementia, severe without behavioral or psychotic or mood disturbances and anxiety, scheduled for 12:00AM, 8:00AM and 4:00PM with start date of 7/22/2025 at 12:00AM. R3's MAR documents R3 received Haldol 5mg routinely on 7/22/2025 at 12AM, 8:00AM, and 4:00PM, on 7/23/2025 12AM, 8:00AM, and 4:00PM, and on 7/24/2025 at 12:00AM, and 8:00AM. On 7/22/2025 at 12:18PM, V3 (LPN) and V4 (LPN) were interviewed together as V4 is in training and was training on 7/21/2025. V3 stated on 7/21/2025 she was training on the floor and received a phone call from the pharmacy in regard to questions about R3's antibiotics. V3 stated as she started looking at R3's medications, she noticed R3 had returned to the facility on 7/18/2025 and orders were not taken care of until she and V4 took care of the orders. V4 stated there were medications given that were to be discontinued like blood pressure medications on return and new medications ordered that were not given due to the orders not being processed. V4 stated she was unsure of what happened but there are several medication errors that occurred.On 7/24/2025 at 1:03PM spoke with V11 (Medical Doctor/MD) in regard to R3's discharge summary medication orders. V11 was asked if he had a discussion with anyone about the Haldol. V11 stated they talked about the hospice type medications including Haldol. V11 was asked why they changed the Haldol from PRN (as per discharge orders) to routine every 8 hours. V11 stated he was unaware of this and was told the Haldol was every 8 hours as needed and only for 14 days and this is what he gave orders for. V11 stated he would talk with V2 and get that changed immediately.On 7/24/2025 at 1:11PM spoke with V2 in regard to the discharge orders and how the orders are a little confusing. V2 was asked to review the Haldol order for R3. V2 stated he was looking at the orders and the order is Haldol 5mg every 8 hours. V2 was asked where the order came from and V2 stated he was discharged from the hospital with all of the hospice medications including Haldol. V2 was asked if he reviewed the discharge orders specifically the Haldol. V2 stated he thinks he talked to V11 about the Haldol and V11 stated they could try it and see if it helps. V2 was informed that V11 reported to this surveyor that he was unaware that the Haldol was routine, and he thought all of the normal hospice orders including Haldol was PRN. V2 stated oh I better call V11 and get something clarified.On 7/24/2025 at 2:22PM, V2 stated he called V11 and the Haldol has been completely discontinued. On 7/25/2025 at 11:37 AM, the behavior tracking for R3 was requested from V1. V1 stated the behaviors would be charted in R3's progress notes. V1 was asked if there was any behavior tracking on R3 prior to the Haldol and V1 stated again the behaviors would be charted in a progress note. V1 was asked if behavior charting with interventions available for R3 and V1 stated no. There was no documentation of behaviors in R3's Progress Notes since his return from the hospital on 7/18/25 and starting the order for Haloperidol on 7/22/25.On 7/23/2025 at 2:15 PM, a facility policy was requested for the use of chemical restraints from V2. V2 stated he would look for one but was not sure he had one. The requested policy was never produced by the end of this survey on 7/25/25.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to process and transcribe physician orders timely and acc...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to process and transcribe physician orders timely and accurately for 1 of 3 (R3) residents reviewed for medications in a sample of 3. R3's admission Record documents an admission date of 6/30/2023 and includes but not limited to diagnoses of Chronic Eosinophilic Pneumonia, Pneumonitis due to Inhalation of Food and Vomit, Unsteadiness on Feet, Unspecified Dementia, Hypomagnesium, Generalized Epilepsy, Anxiety, and Parkinson's disease. R3's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 6/6/2025 documents R3 is rarely understood and is severely impaired. Section GG documents R3 is dependent on staff for transfers and showers and requires substantial/maximum assistance for lower body dressing and putting on and taking off footwear. Section E-Behaviors documents R3 has no hallucinations or delusions, and that R3 has physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others with behaviors of this type 4 to 6 days, but less than daily. R3 has no behaviors exhibited for rejection of care or wandering. R3's care plan documents focus potential for behaviors: resident to resident inappropriate touching, date initiated 5/7/2025. Goal is to decrease risk of behaviors dated 5/7/2025 with target date of 8/14/2025. Interventions/tasks include but not limited to 1:1 activity with be increased, as well as keeping him engaged in meaningful activities, medication review will be completed and referral to be made to geriatric behavioral unit for evaluation dated 5/7/2025, medications as ordered, observe behaviors and try to determine cause.On 7/22/2025 at 11:00AM, V6 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated she was working on 7/18/2025 when R3 returned from the hospital. V6 stated she noticed R3 did not return with any paperwork, so she called the hospital. V6 stated she never received the orders before she left but later realized the orders were laying on the desk. V6 stated she did not process the orders received from the hospital discharge summary prior to leaving work at 6:00PM on 7/18/2025. V6 stated no medications were done on that day or assessments.On 7/22/2025 at 12:18PM, V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) and V4 (LPN) were interviewed together as V4 is in training and was training on 7/21/2025. V3 stated on 7/21/2025 she was training on the floor and received a phone call from the pharmacy in regard to questions about R3's antibiotics. V3 stated as she started looking at R3's medications, she noticed R3 had returned to the facility on 7/18/2025 and orders were not taken care of until she and V4 processed the orders from the discharge summary from hospital return on 7/18/2025. V4 stated there were medications given that were to be discontinued on return and new medications ordered that were not given due to the orders not being processed. V4 stated she was unsure of what happened but there are several medication errors that occurred.R3's progress note documents on 7/21/2025 at 2:58PM (type of note is admission Summary) resident returned to facility on July 18th, 2025. Medication changes were made per hospitalist. Orders were not updated in computer by nurse on duty. Pharmacy called today questioning two antibiotics that were pulled from E-Kit. Upon further investigations, orders changed from hospital and were not updated in the system. Per V2 (Director of Nursing/DON), we will update orders now and contact pharmacy. Authored by V4 (LPN).R3's Discharge Information for Receiving Facility sheet with print date of 7/18/2025 at 8:52AM documents to stop medications of Amlodipine 10mg tablet, Aspirin 81mg tablet, Baclofen 10mg tablet, Avodart 0.5mg capsule, Lisinopril 5 mg tablet, and Metoprolol Succinate XL 25mg. R3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 7/1/2025 -7/31/2025 documents R3 continues on Lisinopril 20mg with a discontinued date of 7/21/2025 and Metoprolol 50mg with a discontinued date of 7/21/2025.R3's Discharge Information for Receiving Facility with print date of 7/18/2025 at 8:52AM documents New Medications, Artificial saliva spray with pump ([NAME]-STIR) one spray mouth/throat every 2 hours PRN (as needed), Famotidine 20mg tablet every 12 hours, Haloperidol 5mg every 8 hours PRN, Ativan 1 mg every 2 hours PRN, Morphine concentrate 20mg/ml. every 2 hours PRN, Narcan as needed, scopolamine 1 mg 3 days patch every 72 hours as needed, Senna Plus one tablet as needed. R3's MAR dated 7/1/2025 -7/31/2025 documents Artificial saliva spray with pump ([NAME]-STIR) one spray mouth/throat every 2 hours (routinely) with start date of 7/21/2025 at 4:00PM and documents administration schedule of every 2 hours, Famotidine 20mg tablet every 12 hours, with start date of 7/21/2025 at 8:00PM with scheduled times of 8:00AM and 8:00PM, Haloperidol 5mg every 8 hours for agitation related to unspecified dementia, severe without behavioral or psychotic or mood disturbances and anxiety, scheduled for 12:00AM, 8:00AM and 4:00PM with start date of 7/22/2025 at 12:00AM. Ativan 1 mg every 2 hours PRN, Morphine concentrate 20mg/ml. every 2 hours PRN, Narcan as needed, scopolamine 1 mg 3 days patch every 72 hours as needed, Senna Plus one tablet as needed. R3's MAR dated 7/1/2025 - 7/31/2025 documents R3 received Haldol 5mg routinely on 7/22/2025 at 12AM, 8:00AM, and 4:00PM. On 7/23/2025 12AM, 8:00AM, and 4:00PM. On 7/24/2025 at 12:00AM, and 8:00AM. R3 received Artificial saliva spray with pump ([NAME]-STIR) one spray mouth/throat every 2 hours starting at 8:00PM on 7/21/2025 through 8AM on 7/23/2025.On 7/22/2025 at 1:42PM, V2 stated he was aware of the issues with admissions and readmissions. V2 stated he noticed the issues with R3's readmission and the lack of order processes. V2 was asked if there were medication errors and V2 stated Yes I am aware. V2 stated nobody notified him of the lack of completion of the readmission and he found the issue when he was doing his chart checks. V2 stated he notified the physician on 7/21/2025 during the evening time of the issues with the readmission. V2 stated he was aware of the multiple medication errors. V2 stated we are starting an investigation and already starting a QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) on admissions and readmissions now. V2 stated MD (Medical Doctor) was notified last night of issues with readmission orders.On 7/23/2025 at 2:30PM V11, (Medical Doctor/MD) stated he was made aware of the issues with the readmission orders for R3 on 7/21/2025. V11 stated he thinks most of the issue came when R3's orders said he was to be Hospice, and the wife was declining Hospice. R3 stated he blames this on the hospital and the hospital should call and report to tell the facility what medications are discontinued, or new medications are started. V11 stated there was no harm to R3 with the medication errors. V11 stated he met with R3's wife and they agree that R3 can continue with the same care at the facility and does not need Hospice involvement. V11 stated he was keeping the hospice medications as PRN (as needed) in case they were needed, such as if R3 has a decline as he is in poor condition.On 7/23/2025 at 12:08PM, R3 was in the dining being fed by V12 (R3's Spouse). R3 would not converse in a conversation or answer any questions. R3 was being assisted with a diet of pureed foods and nectar thickened liquids. V12 stated R3 has not conversed much in a while. V12 stated the hospital wanted him to be on Hospice but she is not ready for that, and he can receive the same treatment at the facility. On 7/23/2025 at 2:07PM observed R3 sitting at nurse's station in wheelchair. R3 would not answer questions but would make eye contact when spoken to.On 7/24/2025 at 1:03PM spoke with V11 in regard to discharge summary medication orders. Informed V11 that the orders to discontinue Metoprolol Succinate XL 25 mg (R3 is on 50mg at facility), Lisinopril 5mg (R3 on 20mg at facility) were discontinued on the hospital discharge summary orders. V11 stated well R3 seems to be doing pretty good without these medications. V11 was informed that R3 remained on the medications and with the dosage that he was on when he went to the hospital upon return. V11 stated ok. V11 was also asked if he had a discussion with anyone about the Haldol. V11 stated they talked about the hospice type medications including Haldol. V11 was asked why they changed the Haldol from PRN (as per discharge orders) to routine every 8 hours. V11 stated he was unaware of this and was told the Haldol was every 8 hours as needed and only for 14 days and this is what he gave orders for. V11 stated he would talk with V2 and get that changed immediately. V11 stated he thinks the hospital used an old medication list and that is why the dosages of the blood pressure medications were different. V11 thought all of the PRN medications were going to stay PRN and see how R3 does.On 7/24/2025 at 1:11PM spoke with V2 regarding the discharge orders and how the orders are a little confusing. V2 was asked to review the Haldol order for R3. V2 stated he was looking at the orders and the order is Haldol 5mg every 8 hours. V2 was asked where the order came from. V2 stated he was discharged from the hospital with all the hospice medications including Haldol. V2 was asked if he reviewed the discharge orders specifically the Haldol. V2 stated he thinks he talked to V11 about the Haldol and V11 stated they could try it and see if it helps. V2 was informed that V11 reported to this surveyor that he was unaware that the Haldol was routine, and he thought all of the normal hospice orders including Haldol was PRN. V2 stated, Oh I better call V11 and get something clarified.On 7/24/2025 at 2:22PM, V2 stated he emailed the requested records and V2 stated he called V11, and the Haldol has been completely discontinued. V2 was also informed the Artificial saliva spray with pump ([NAME]-STIR) one spray mouth/throat every 2 hours was routinely scheduled, and the discharge orders were for PRN. V2 stated that was caught yesterday and was discontinued.Policy titled admission Assessment and Follow Up: Role of the Nurse, dated revised September 2012, documents 13. Reconcile the list of medications from the medication history, admitting orders, the previous MAR, and discharge summary from the previous institution, according to established procedures. 14. Contact the Attending Physician to communicate and review findings of the initial assessment and any other pertinent information and obtain admissions orders that are based on findings.Policy titled Reconciliation of Medications on admission dated revised July 2017, documents the purpose of this procedure is to ensure medication safety by accurately accounting for he resident's medications, routes and dosages upon admission or readmission to the facility. Preparation: 1. Gather the information needed to reconcile the medication list. b. Discharge summary from referring facility. e. Most recent medication administration record (MAR) if this is a readmission. General Guidelines, 4. Medication reconciliation help to ensure that medications, routes and dosages have been accurately communicated to the Attending Physician and care team.Policy titled Medication and Treatment Orders for Admission/readmission and New Orders dated January 2017 documents, all new and readmission medications from the hospital shall be reviewed by the primary physician. If in the event the patient is not admitted or readmitted with clear admission orders it will be up to the discretion of the attending physician on what to order or continue to order.
Jul 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical and verbal abuse for 1 (R1...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical and verbal abuse for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 7. Findings include: R1's admission Record documents an initial admission date of 6/25/2025. This same document listed the following diagnoses of cellulitis of right and left lower limb, chronic kidney disease and venous insufficiency. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 11, indicating R1 had moderate cognitively impairment. R2's admission Record documents an initial admission date of 6/26/2025. This same document listed the following diagnoses of dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, mild, with other behavioral disturbances, insomnia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 0, indicating R2 had severe cognitively impairment. On 7/5/2025 at 12:48 PM V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated, she had been in the process of passing medications around 8:00 am to residents when she heard yelling and cussing coming from R1 and R2's shared room. V3 stated, when she went into R1 and R2's shared room, she witnessed R2 hit R1 on her left elbow with his cane. V3 stated, R2 continued to yell at R1 I will kill you. V3 stated, R1 told her that R2 does get like this when he is angry or upset. V3 stated, V4 (Regional Director of Operations) did direct her to separate R1 and R2 from each other, call the police and Illinois Department of Health (IDPH) to report incident. On 7/5/2025 at 1:16 PM R1 stated, R2 became upset about his father's watch missing this morning. R1 stated, R2 does worry about his watch all the time. R1 stated, R2 did push her with the end of the cane in her left elbow. On 7/5/2025 at 3:02 PM V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated, V3 (LPN) notified him of an argument between R1 and R2 that occurred 8:00 AM. V2 stated, V3 notified him that R2 hit R1 with his cane to her left arm but, there were no marks or injuries to the area. V2 stated, V3 told him that R2 said to R1 that he was going to shoot her and put her in the ground. V2 stated, V1 (Interim Administrator) and V4 (Regional Operations Director) were notified, along with the local police department. R1's Progress Note dated 7/5/2025 at 8:50 AM by V3 (LPN) documented I heard the two residents arguing, walked into room and seen the other resident hit her with the end of his cane. He was also saying I will kill you and put you underground R1's Progress Note dated 7/5/2025 at 9:28 AM by V3 (LPN) documented she was instructed by V2 (DON) to report to Illinois Department of Public Health, spoke with them via phone and made report, they will mail findings and call with any further questions. The Facility's Initial Reportable Event dated 7/5/2025 documented an investigation had been started into the physical and verbal altercation between R1 and R2 that occurred on 7/5/25. The Facility's Abuse Prevention Program Policy (revised December 2016) documented under Policy Statement: Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. This same document documented under Policy Interpretation and Implementation: As part of the resident abuse prevention, the administration will: 1. Protect our residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies, family members, legal representatives, friends, visitors, or any other individual
May 2025 2 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide supervision of a cognitively impaired ambulato...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide supervision of a cognitively impaired ambulatory resident in 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for elopement risk in the sample of 3 residents. The failure resulted in R4 exiting the facility at approximately 6:30 AM on 5/6/25 and was followed by V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse) to a local business. While in the parking lot of the business, R4 left V3's line of sight which resulted in R4 going unsupervised from approximately 6:50 AM until 9:10 AM when R4 was located in the garage of a local residence by the police. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 5/6/25 at approximately 6:50 am when V3 lost sight of R4 after R4 had exited the facility. R4 was not located until 9:10 am when R4 was found in a garage by the police. V1 (Administrator), V2 (Director of Nursing/DON), V18 (Chief Officer of Operations/COO) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 5/13/25 at 9:14 AM. The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed, and the deficient practice corrected on 5/6/25. Findings include: R4's admission Record documents an admission date of 3/28/2025 and includes diagnoses of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity without behavioral disturbances, psychotic disturbances, mood disturbance, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, single episode, unspecified and glaucoma. R4's MDS (Minimum data Set) dated 4/4/2025 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 7 indicating that R4 has severe cognitive impairment. Section GG documents R4 requires supervision or touching assistance with mobility. Section E, Behavior, documents under Wandering occurred 1 to 3 days during the assessment period and documents yes to Does the wandering place the resident at significant risk for getting to a potentially dangerous place (e.g., stairs, outside of the facility)? R4's Elopement Risk Assessment effective date 3/30/25 documents that R4 has a history of previous elopement attempts at home and is considered at risk for elopement. R4's Elopement Risk Assessment effective date 4/1/25 documents that R4 has a history of previous elopement attempts at home and is considered at risk for elopement. R4's Elopement Risk Assessment effective date 5/5/25 documents that R4 has a history of previous elopement attempts at home and is considered at risk for elopement. R4's Care Plan has focus area of elopement dated 3/30/2025 with goal for decreased elopement risk. Interventions dated 3/30/2025 list, photo taken and added to elopement book, wandering behavior, and resident likes hot tea with honey, offer to her when exit seeking or wandering. R4's Progress Notes document on 5/5/2025 at 9:00AM, Note Text: Resident exit seeking, had her jacket on and purse in hand stating she was leaving now, due to this, I was watching her as she got to the door and was redirected. Authored by V3 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). R4's Progress Notes document on 5/5/2025 at 09:02 AM, Note Text: Resident exit seeking, had coat on and purse in hand stating she was leaving now, resident got to the door and was redirected back to her room, will get urinalysis if possible due to acute confusion and this was out of the ordinary for this resident, will notify her son, power of attorney of incident. Authored by V3 LPN. On 5/5/2025 at 12:15 PM, R4 was observed in the front lobby with staff around R4, R4 was saying she wanted to leave, and she had a birthday party to go to. Staff was intervening to keep R4 inside the facility. R4 was not easily redirected On 5/5/2025 at 1:00PM, R4 was observed outside with 3 employees. R4 was stating she was leaving and not coming back. Staff was encouraging resident to return inside the building but R4 refused. R4's Progress Note dated 5/6/2025 at 2:12PM, documents, alarm went off this morning at 6:30AM and resident had left the property, V3 followed her to make sure R4 didn't get hurt but when V3 called the police and rehab resident took off and could not be found, resident found 3 hours later, taken to local hospital for evaluation then brought back to facility and stated R4 was going to leave again. A document titled Police Department Incident Report, date reported 5/6/2025 at 6:56:44 via wire phone. Incident missing elderly woman at (Name of local street). Dispatched at 7:22:30 AM, [NAME] was deployed at 8:45:04, (R4) located at 9:10:13 AM in garage right behind local business, called ambulance. R4's Elopement investigation dated 5/6/2025 at 6:30AM prepared by V19 (Regional Clinical Director) documents incident description: Resident (R4) exited A wing door, nurse immediately followed and attempted to re-direct resident back into the facility. Resident was very agitated and restless and would not re-enter the facility. Nurse continued to walk with resident and attempted to talk with her and attempt to redirect back to the facility. Resident description: Resident is unable to give description. Immediate Action Taken: Description: Medical Doctor (MD) and Power of Attorney (POA) notified. Police notified. Resident taken to the hospital. N. Mental Status section is not completed. Mental Status: oriented to person. Section titled Notes dated 5/6/2025 documents at 6:30PM staff assisting resident out to dining room for breakfast. Door alarm started sounding. Nurse (V3) immediately went to the A wing door and exited it and seen resident. Resident had on appropriate clothing, gray jacket, gray pants and tennis shoes. Temp outside was approximately 56 degrees. V3 immediately went to resident and attempted to re-direct her back into the facility. Resident was not redirected. Resident was very agitated and stated that she was going to Texas. V3 stayed with resident and walked beside while she continued to redirect. V3 and resident came to the main highway Route 51 and nurse and resident safely crossed the main highway. V3 and R4 went to local business where resident was trying to open their door. V3 saw an employee sitting in his truck in the parking lot so V3 and resident walked over to the employee so V3 could ask him to call 911. Employee opened the door to speak to V3 and R4 started walking towards the front of the truck and then took off running east. On 5/6/2025 at 7:00AM Facility Administrator (V1) and Director of Nursing (V2) notified, and police called. V1, V2 and several staff members immediately began searching for resident in their cars as well as on foot. MD and resident's son immediately notified. At 7:30AM Police have notified the Illinois State Police, and they have begun a search as well. At 8:30AM IDPH notified. At 9:10AM R4 located behind local business in a garage. Resident appears safe and without injuries. Police and ambulance at location and EMS (Emergency Medical Services) transported resident to the hospital to be checked out further. MD and POA updated immediately. At 11:30AM R4 returned from the ER (Emergency Room). No injuries or acute conditions noted. Full assessment completed and noted no injuries, etc. MD and POA notified of resident's return to the facility. On 5/6/2025 at 8:30AM, this surveyor received a call from V17 (Owner of Facility) stating R4 had eloped and was missing. V17 stated a staff member was with the resident the whole time but then the resident got out of sight and now they can't find her. V17 stated the staff, police department, and fire department were on the scene in the area looking for R4. Upon entering the facility on 5/6/2025 at 9:10AM, V19 (Regional Clinical Director) stated have you heard about (R4)? V19 stated well R4 went out the door and the nurse (V3) responded to the door alarm and followed the resident all the way to the local tire shop. V19 stated at that time V3 flagged down an employee and as the employee was opening the door to let R4 in, V3 turned around and R4 was just gone. V3 stated the search then started so they could find R4, but she has not been found yet. V18 stated, We don't know where she could be. On 5/6/2025 at 10:40AM, V18 (Director of Operations) approached this surveyor and asked if this surveyor knew what had happened. V18 stated R4 went out the door and the nurse (V3) responded to the alarm. V18 said the nurse could not convince R4 to come back in so V3 followed R4 down to the main road. V18 stated they then crossed the road and V3 still could not convince R4 to go back so V3 went into the local tire shop to ask them to call for help. V18 stated when V3 quickly came back out then R4 was gone, so the search began and was finally found. On 5/7/2025 at 12:45PM, V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated she was the charge nurse for R4 the morning of 5/6/2025. V3 stated she heard the alarm going off at the door at the end of A hall. V3 stated it was around 6:30AM. V3 stated she ran out the door and R4 kept walking so she walked with her. V3 said R4 walked up towards the local tire store going down roads and alleys. V3 stated R4 said I am going to see my son. V3 stated, We crossed the main highway, but I was with her. V3 stated, (R4) did look both ways before crossing the road, and I had her arm the whole time. V3 stated, I see a gray truck parked at the tire shop and I went to the man in the truck to call 911 and in a matter of seconds R4 disappeared as I was walking around the gray truck. V3 stated she looked for R4 but could not find her anywhere. V3 stated others from work came to help search for R4. V3 stated she looked for about an hour and had to go back to the facility to return to work. V3 stated the police were involved too. V3 stated R4 was not an elopement risk before this and has never known R4 to try to elope out of the facility. V3 stated when they brought R4 back, R4 stated she was leaving again so they got her a puppy, V3 stated R4 didn't try to go out anymore. R3 stated she had worked on 5/5/2025 as well. On 5/7/2025 at 11:00AM, V9 (local business employee) stated the store opens at 7:30AM. V9 stated he got to the store close to 7:00AM on the 6th of May 2025. V9 stated when he got there his coworker told him that an older female and a nurse were just there, and the older female went missing. V9 stated he pulled up the camera and watched the nurse and older female on camera. V9 offered to allow this surveyor to watch the video of the camera film of the morning of the 5/6/2025. V9 stated the man that talked with the nurse will be at work tomorrow (5/8/2025). V9 stated when the police knocked on the garage door that resident yelled Come in. V9 then stated the police got in and got her. On 5/7/2025 at 11:00AM while obtaining interviews at the local business where R4 was last seen, review of camera footage from 5/6/2025 was done. The camera footage at 6:49AM R4 and V3 was noted to be walking on sidewalk on [NAME] street, at 6:50:05 R4 tried to enter a house going up 2 steps, V3 stayed on walkway. At 6:50:21AM R4 advanced towards the 4-lane highway, V3 was beside R4 at this time and tried to hold R4's arm but R4 resisted. The two then advanced out on the highway to cross the highway, the two separated about midway across the road leaving approximately a 6-foot distance. At 6:51:03AM V3 held up arm to stop oncoming traffic. At 6:51:27AM R4 was noted to be walking to the front door of the business and V3 was out in the parking lot looking at the traffic on the 4 lane road. At 6:52:07AM R4 was seen walking beside a gray pick up truck on the driver's side and continued on around the back of the truck and on out of view of the camera off the parking lot. At this time V3 was standing out on the parking lot looking at the 4-lane road. At 6:52:31 AM V3 walked up to the gray truck and stood beside driver's side door, at 6:53:06 AM V3 came running out from the side of the truck out onto the parking lot looking for R4. On 5/8/2025 at 9:50AM spoke with V14 (employee at local business) about the morning of 5/6/2025 when R4 went missing. V14 stated he was sitting in his truck a little before 7:00AM, waiting for the store to open. V14 stated he saw the nurse and the elderly lady walking in the parking lot. V14 stated the nurse (V3) came up to him and asked him to call the facility she worked at to get help getting R4 back to the facility. V14 stated V3 did not have her phone so he had to google the phone number. V14 stated R4 was not with V3 at that time. V14 stated he then let V3 call the facility to get some help. V14 stated 911 was not called from his phone at that time. V14 stated when V3 was done with the phone call she looked up and did not see R4, so she took off running looking for her. V14 stated he then went and looked himself and did not see the resident, but he saw footprints in the wet grass that led to a garage behind the house next door. V14 noticed the door was cracked open. V14 stated he then went to the business parking lot at 7:09 AM, and V1 and V3 arrived, and he told V1 about the footprints in the grass and advised her to go talk to the homeowner and ask permission to go back in the garage and look. V14 stated V1 went to the house and spoke to the homeowner but did not go around back and look in the garage. V14 stated V1 then left in her car. V14 stated he went back out a little later to see if anyone had found R4, but nobody had found her. V14 stated he looked at the garage door and noticed the door was now shut. V14 stated when the police arrived a little after 10AM he told them that he had reported to the nursing staff that he suspected R4 may be in the garage due to the footprints in the grass earlier in the morning and the door now being closed. V14 stated the police officer then went to the back of the house and knocked on the garage door and they heard R4 say Come on in. V14 stated the police then helped R4 and called the ambulance to transport the resident to the hospital. On 5/7/2025 at 12:03 PM, V1 stated she found out that R4 had eloped when she was coming to work on 5/6/2025 at around 7:00AM. V1 stated she went to local tire shop where she was told that R4 was last seen. V1 stated she started looking immediately for R4. V1 stated she looked all around the building and even went and looked in building behind the tire shop. V1 stated she looked in sheds behind the house next door but did not look in the garage because close to the garage was the back door and it had a sign that said, this house is protected by guns. V1 stated so she was afraid to enter any of the doors. V1 stated the police called her for information on R4. V1 stated she was out the whole time looking for R4 except when she came to the facility to use the restroom. V1 stated her boss notified the owner and his assistant. V1 stated they have since put interventions in place like a stuffed dog for R4, a pilfer box with nursing supplies as R4 is a retired nurse. V1 stated someone is with her at all times, a banner for R4's door with alarms which is ordered and not in place yet, and a medication review. On 5/7/2025 at 1:50PM, V12 (Certified Nurse Aide/CNA) stated she was not working on 5/6/2024 but when she works, she normally works A hall where R4 resides. V12 stated R4 is one of the wanderers. On the days she is exit seeking we try to let all the staff know so we can all watch her. V12 stated she doesn't recall R4 ever actually getting out of the building. V12 stated R4 normally walks safely and doesn't use assistive devices. V12 stated she noticed R4 had a cane today but not sure why. V12 stated the last time she was educated on elopement was when the other DON was here. On 5/7/2024 at 1:40PM, V11 (CNA) stated she normally works A hall where R4 resides. V11 stated R4 was up and dressed when she got to work on 5/7/2025 at 6:00AM. V11 stated she never heard the alarm that morning as she was either outside cooling off or in the bathroom. V11 stated she was notified a little after 6:30AM that R4 had eloped. V11 stated R4 has never tried to elope before. V11 stated the last time she saw R4 was before she went out and she was at the front of the hall. V11 stated when R4 returned she was agitated but she didn't try to exit anymore. V11 stated R4 is on 1:1 right now and she hopes they keep it that way for a while. On 5/7/2025 at 2:10PM, V2 was asked when elopement assessments are due, V2 stated he was not sure. V2 was asked what prompts an elopement assessment that is not scheduled and V2 then stated, When someone attempts to elope. V2 was asked who does the elopement assessments when a resident attempts to elope. V2 stated, I am not sure, but I would think the nurses do but mostly social services. V2 then stated if an attempted elopement happens on the weekends, he was not sure if the nurses do it or if they wait until a business day when social services is at work. V2 was asked when the last time elopement training had been done with staff and V2 stated, I don't know, I haven't been here in the position of DON very long. V2 was asked if R4 has had any changes since she has been back, V2 stated she is calmer today because we added Xanax 0.5mg twice a day. V2 was asked if R4 was ever complaining of pain, V2 stated no she has not complained of pain or anything today. V2 stated R4 was not exit seeking today but she was yesterday. V2 stated R4's interventions for the elopement from yesterday was 1:1 but not sure how long, offer pilfer box, a stuffed dog, tab alarm while in bed, frequent checks, offer cup of coffee, talk with resident about nursing as resident is a retired nurse. On 5/8/2025 at 11:35AM spoke with V15 (R4's daughter), as they sat with R4. V15 stated the care at the facility was good, and she was not aware of R4 trying to elope before 5/6/025. V15 stated she did know that on 5/5/2025 R4 had packed a bag and told everyone she was leaving and was just recently told this. V15 was asked if she was concerned with the care that R4 received at the facility. V15 stated it is worrisome with R4's room being close to the door that she went out. V15 was asked if anyone has offered a room change and V15 stated, No not yet. V15 stated she has even thought of another facility for R4 because she is not settling down here and she won't take her medications. V15 did mention another nursing home that is near the other son that they may move R4 too. V15 stated, Who can I talk to about this because nobody has mentioned moving R4 to me. V15 was advised to talk to the staff. On 5/8/2025 at 12:50PM, V16 (CNA) stated her first day of work was 5/6/2025. V16 stated she was in the dining room helping serve breakfast around 7:00AM when V3 came in and stated a resident was missing. V16 stated that was the first time she was made aware of anyone missing. V16 stated she did not hear any alarms going off. On 5/8/2025 at 12:54 PM, V17 (CNA) stated she was in the dining room serving breakfast when V1 and V3 came in and told us all that R4 was missing. V17 stated she never heard an alarm, but she had been in other residents' rooms getting them dressed for breakfast. V17 stated she didn't know R4 that well and she was unaware of R4 trying to elope before the occurrence on 5/6/2025. R4's Nursing Note dated 5/6/2025 at 11:30 AM documents, Note Text: Resident returned from the ER. No injuries or acute conditions noted. No new orders received from the hospital. MD and POA notified of her return. Resident directed to the dining room to have lunch. The Immediate Jeopardy that began on 5/6/25 was removed and deficient practice corrected on 5/6/25 when the facility took the following actions to remove the Immediacy and correct the noncompliance. The facility completed an elopement assessment for R4 on 5/5/2025 and completed another assessment for R4 on 5/6/2025. The care plan has been updated for R4 and does identify the resident is at risk for elopements with interventions put in place. The staff has always answered the door alarms. On 5/6/2025 Interventions were reviewed and new interventions put into place. 1. Nursing Pilfer Box with items such as, stethoscope, thermometer, pen/paper, bandages, etc. to deter R4 from wandering and/or exit seeking. 2. Signs placed on all exit doors that say Stop Emergency Exit or Ask Staff for Assistance. 3. Interactive dog named [NAME] for resident to keep with her to help remind her of her long time dog at home to help provide calming and deter them from exit seeking. 4. Motion sensor alarm applied to resident's door of her room. 5. Bed pad alarm applied to resident's bed. 6. Resident was placed on 1:1's to ensure interventions were effective for 48 hours and then moved to every 15 min. 7. Vulnerable residents requiring supervision identified and training completed on Supervision and will not leave residents unattended or out of their line of sight in potentially unsafe locations completed on 5/6/2025, by V19 RN, Regional Nurse Consultant. The facility completed Elopement In-service with all staff on 5/6/2025 by V19, RN, Regional Nurse Consultant. All staff absent during the time of the in-service was in-serviced prior to next scheduled shift or via phone call. All Residents at risk for elopement have been reviewed to ensure interventions are in place and are in care plan, to address elopement behaviors and to decrease risk; completed on 5/6/2025 by V19, RN, Regional Nurse Consultant. The DON V1 and V2 will complete the following: 1. Monitor 5 residents daily to assure there are no new wander risks. 2. Elopement drills will occur weekly on all 3 shifts for 4 weeks then will be decreased according to QAPI recommendations. 3. Elopement book will be reviewed weekly to ensure current for 4 weeks. 4. Door alarms and stop signs will be checked daily for 4 weeks then weekly for 4 weeks.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0605 (Tag F0605)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for medications in a sa...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for medications in a sample of 3. This failure resulted in R4 sustaining a fall due to a loss of balance, resulting in a hip fracture requiring surgical intervention. Findings include: R4's admission Record documents an admission date of 3/28/2025 and includes diagnoses of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity without behavioral disturbances, psychotic disturbances, mood disturbance, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, single episode, unspecified and glaucoma. R4's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/4/2025 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 7 indicating that R4 has severe cognitive impairment. Section GG documents R4 requires supervision or touching assistance with mobility. R4 requires supervision or touching assistance with ability to walk 10feet, 50 feet with 2 turns, and 150 feet once standing. R4 is independent to roll left to right. R4 requires supervision or touching assistance with sit to lying position changes, lying to sitting on side of bed, sit to stand, chair/bed-to-chair transfer, and tub/shower transfer. R4's Fall Risk Evaluation dated 4/3/2025 at 8:34PM Category: NA, Level of Consciousness/mental state: Alert (oriented x3) , History of falls past 3 months: No falls in past 3 months, Ambulation/elimination status: Ambulatory/ continent, Vision status: Adequate with or without glasses, Gait/balance: Gait/balance normal, systolic blood pressure: no noted drop in blood pressure between lying and standing, Medications: none of these medications taken currently or within 7 days, Resident has had a change in medication or change in dosage in the past 5 days (Not checked), Predisposing disease: None present. R4's Care Plan documents a focus area of, I am risk for falls Gait/balance problems. Initiation date of 3/31/25. Interventions include anticipate and meet my needs initiated 3/31/25, walk with resident if she keeps pacing assist to chair with activity, initiated 4/3/25. R4's Care Plan documents another focus area of, Resident requires use of Box Warning Medications. Initiation date of 3/28/25. Goal: No injury or adverse effect related to medication usage. Interventions include: administer black box medications as ordered by medical doctor (MD), see Physician order sheet. Assess for adverse side effects, document and report to MD. Behavior tracking in place for psychotropic medications and reviewed per facility protocol. Labs as ordered by physician to monitor efficacy of medications. Medication list reviewed routinely with resident and /or resident representative/ Power of Attorney of Healthcare, Pharmacy consultant review medications use and potential side effects. Resident medications are to be reviewed monthly and as needed by pharmacist and physician. Teach about side effects of medications with family member/responsible party. Verbal consent received before initiation of any new or increased psychotropic medications and consents updated per facility protocol. R4's Care Plan also documents a focus area, I use anti-anxiety medications Anxiety disorder. Initiated 3/28/25. Interventions include: I am taking Anti-anxiety meds which are associated with an increased risk of confusion, amnesia, loss of balance, and cognitive impairment that looks like dementia, falls, broken hips and legs. Monitor FREQ (frequently) for safety. Date Initiated 3/28/25. 1. R4's Order Recap Report with a print date of 5/21/22 documents the following orders: Xanax (Benzodiazepines) 0.5 mg (milligrams), give every 12 hours PRN (as needed) for anxiety/agitation with a start date of 3/28/2025 (admission date) and an end date of 5/6/25. R4's March, April, and May 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documents that R4 received 4 doses of the PRN Xanax from the time period of 3/28/2025 through 5/6/2025 on 4/7/2025 at 10:22PM, 4/21/2025 at 7:11PM, 4/28/2025 at 9:18PM, and 4/30/2025 at 7:53PM. The same Order Recap Report documents an order for Xanax 0.5 mg give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day related to anxiety with a start date of 5/6/25 and an end date of 5/8/25 and an order for Xanax 0.5 mg give 1 tablet by mouth three times a day related to anxiety with a start date of 5/8/25 and an end date of 5/16/25. R4's Progress Note dated 5/6/2025 at 2:12PM, authored by V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse), documents alarm went off this morning (at) 630 (6:30AM) and resident had left the property, I followed her to make sure she didn't get hurt but when I called the police and rehab resident took off and could not be found, resident was found about 3 hours later, taken to (name of local hospital) for eval then brought back to facility and stated she was going to leave again. A document titled Police Department Incident Report, date reported 5/6/2025 at 6:56:44 via wire phone documents Incident missing elderly woman at (Name of local street). Dispatched at 7:22:30 AM, [NAME] was deployed at 8:45:04, R4 located at 9:10:13 AM in garage right behind local business, called ambulance. R4's Progress Note dated 5/6/25 at 5:00PM, authored by V2 (Director of Nursing), documents Spoke with V20 (Physician) regarding resident's anxiety. New orders received for 0.5 mg Xanax BID (twice a day). Spoke with family and obtained consent for this medication. Family stated they thought this was a good idea and was very pleased with today's outcome offering praise to the staff. On 5/7/2025 at 1:58PM, R4 was observed ambulating with an assistive device of a cane. At that time R4 was with V13 (Activity Aide) who stated she is the one on one for R4 today. V13 was asked if R4 always used a cane. V13 stated no but R4 stated her foot hurt. R4 was asked what was hurting and R4 stated my right foot is really hurting. R4's Progress Note dated 5/7/25 at 2:22PM, authored by V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse), documents Resident stated her right foot is hurting, I called (V20) and left VM (voicemail). Waiting for response. R4's Progress Note dated 5/7/25 at 7:27PM, authored by V19 (Regional Clinical Director), documents X-ray results reviewed to resident's right foot and right ankle and all results are negative for any acute fractures. MD and POA (Power of Attorney) both updated of results. 2. R4's Order Recap Report with a print date of 5/21/25 documents an order for Risperidone (Antipsychotic) Oral Tablet give 1 mg by mouth one time only related to unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety for 1 day with a start date of 5/8/25 and an end date of 5/8/25. R4's Progress Note dated 5/8/25 at 8:39AM, authored by V2, documents Spoke with family regarding residents exit seeking behavior and calling family all hours of the night. Family requested to call (V20). (V20) notified and one time dose of risperidone 1 mg to be given at this time. Resident will be monitored closely for any adverse effects and (V20) will be called this afternoon. R4's May Medication Administration Record (MAR) documents a 1 on 5/8/25 for the Risperidone 1mg order. The Chart Codes/Follow Up Codes on the MAR documents that a 1 indicates refused. On 5/15/2025 at 1:54AM, V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated that on 5/8/2025 R4 did take her one-time dose of Risperidone. V10 stated on 5/8/2025, she crushed the Risperidone and mixed it in water so R4 would take the medication, but R4 still refused. V10 stated she marked refused on the Medication Administration Record. V10 stated R4 did finally take the Risperidone around 2:00PM with convincing by the family and a police officer. V10 stated she forgot to go back and document on the Medication Administration Record that R4 did actually take the Risperidone. On 5/8/2025 at 10:20AM, R4 was observed in a wheelchair with V13 by her side. V13 stated she has R4 in a wheelchair due to R4 having unsteady balance and almost falling. V13 stated she was doing the one to one with R4. R4 was asked how her foot pain was and R4 stated, It doesn't even hurt anymore. R4 was asked if it hurt when she walked on it and R4 stated, No not at all. On 5/8/2025 at 11:45AM, observed R4 sitting at the nurse's station with V15 (family member) and V22 (Power of Attorney). V15 was trying to talk R4 into taking her medication. V22 stated the medication was Risperidone. R4 stated I am not taking that medication; I am a nurse, and you all are not doing that to me. On 5/8/2025 at 1:40PM, R4 was observed at the nurse's station with V15 and V22 present with another person whom V13 identified at this time as a cop that is friends with V22. V13 said that R4 likes cops so he is trying to talk (R4) into taking the rest of that medication. On 5/8/2025 at 2:00PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) and V19 (Regional Clinical Director) were sitting in a front office and V2 stated, We have (R4) on Xanax now and gave Risperdal for the anxiety and elopement attempts. V2 was asked what diagnosis R4 had for the Risperidone and V2 stated Dementia. V2 stated we don't know what else to do to keep R4 from eloping again. On 5/8/25 at 2:10PM, V13 stated, She took the medication for the cop so she must trust cops. On 5/8/2025 at 2:40PM, R4 was observed sitting at the dining room table in a wheelchair. R4 was sitting with V13. R4 appeared sluggish with her eyes halfway open. V13 stated at this time that R4 is unsafe for ambulation due to being unsteady on her feet. R4's Progress Note dated 5/8/25 at 2:50PM, authored by V2, documents Spoke with (V20) regarding Risperidone. Risperidone DC'd (discontinued) and new order obtained for Xanax 0.5 mg TID (three times a day). Family is aware. There are no further Progress Note entries for R4 on 5/8/25 and 5/9/25. On 5/8/2025 at 3:00PM, V13 stated R4 is on medications, and she is sort of out of it. At that time R4 was sitting in a wheelchair in the dining room with increased confusion noted and eyes were hard for resident to keep open. R4's speech was more slurred than previous observation. On 5/9/2025 at 10:25AM, R4 was asked how she felt today and R4 stated, I am really tired. R4's Progress note dated 5/10/2025 at 1:09PM authored by V3 (LPN) documents, resident was getting out of her wheelchair when she lost her balance and fell landing on her right hip and right arm, V13 tried to catch her but couldn't. Resident then was sent to local hospital to be evaluated, family and V2, V1 (Administrator), and V20 were notified. An incident report sent to the Illinois Department of Public Health regarding R4 documents on 5/10/2025, at 1:09PM Resident observed on the floor by nurse's station. Resident was assessed immediately with noted pain to right hip. Resident's vitals were within normal limits. Medical doctor notified with orders to send resident to hospital for further evaluation and treatment. Power of Attorney notified. Emergency Medical Services arrived and transported resident to local hospital. Local hospital called the facility and notified staff that resident had suffered a right hip fracture. Medical doctor and Power of attorney. R4, 92, diagnosis Atrial Fibrillation, anxiety, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and age-related osteoporosis, BIMS 8. The resident ambulates about the facility independently. On 5/10/2025, around 1 PM, R4 was ambulating in A Hall and V13 was speaking with her and R4 stated her feet were tired and sore. There was an empty wheelchair sitting in the hall and V13 asked her if she would like to sit down and R4 said yes. After sitting in wheelchair, R4 said she wanted to speak with kids (they had just left the facility), so V13 asked R4 if she wanted to call them and R4 said yes. V13 pushed R4 up to the nurse's station to make the call. V13 went to retrieve a regular chair for R4 to sit in and R4 stood up, began to walk away. When V13 returned with the chair, R4 turned around, lost her balance, got her feet tangled together, and fell. At the time of the fall, R4 was wearing proper footwear, and the interventions were in place. After a thorough investigation that root cause of the incident is lack of balance and proprioception. Upon return from the hospital, a Medication Review will be completed by pharmacy consultant and results provided to the attending physician, hip protectors will be provided, and an order for physical therapy with a focus on balance and proprioception. The attending physician and power of attorney have been updated on the findings of investigation. R4's Emergency Department Provider Notes records dated 5/10/2025 at 2:47PM, documents Pt (patient) arrives via Ems (Emergency Medical Services) from (name of facility. Per EMS, pt got up from wheelchair, fell against a medcart, and fell to the ground on her R (right) side. Pt c/o (complains of) pain to R hip. R leg shortening and rotation noted. Under ED Course it documents Orthopedic surgery has been consulted; patient is to be admitted under the Trauma Service. Under Clinical Impression it documents Fall, initial encounter, Closed fracture of right hip, initial encounter. A hospital Procedure Note dated 5/12/25 documents Pre-operative Diagnosis: Right closed displaced intertrochanteric femur fracture and Procedure: Right short cephalomedullary nail. On 5/13/2025 at 1:00PM, V13 (Assistant Activity Director) called this surveyor over where V13 was standing in the dining room. V13 stated, Did you hear about (R4)? She fell and broke her hip, and I feel bad. V13 stated she was doing the one to one with R4 and R4 had been in a wheelchair all day. V13 stated R4's family member had left and R4 then wanted to call her family. V13 stated she pushed R4 up to the nurse's station but R4 wanted to call from her personal cell phone. V13 stated, I went down to (R4's) room to get her cell phone, I wish now I would have just pushed her down there with me, but I left her at the nurse's station while I ran down there really quick. V13 stated she got the phone and headed back up by the nurse's station and as she was approaching R4, R4 stood up and took a couple of steps and fell. V13 stated, I tried really hard to catch her, but I couldn't. V13 stated I feel so bad for leaving her. On 5/14/2025 at 9:53AM, V13 (Assistant Activity Director) stated actually R4 was out of it and more confused on Saturday. V13 stated R4 didn't try to get up much on Saturday to try to walk, but I would help her walk if needed. V13 stated on Saturday R4 was mostly in a wheelchair but I helped her to sit in a regular chair for meals and activities. V13 stated before the elopement (R4) moved pretty fast and on that day when she returned, I started the one on one and she was still the same, but then she became more sluggish with the medications. V13 stated she was working the day 5/8/2024 when the cop came in and talked R4 into taking a medication that R4 would not take for anyone else. V13 did not know what the medication was. V13 stated there was another girl at the nurse's station when R4 fell. V13 stated R4 was in pain after the fall, and she was trying to get up out of the floor. On 5/13/2025 at 3:10PM, V3 (LPN) came to the room this surveyor was working in and asked if she could talk for just a minute. V3 was tearful. V3 stated, I guess you know (R4) fell and broke her hip on Saturday (5/10/2025). V3 stated, I was working that day, and it was bad. V3 stated she knew that would happen and she even questioned the doctor about giving R4 the Xanax. V3 stated she told the doctor that R4 would end up falling. V3 stated you cannot give those drugs to residents that ambulate because it causes them to be unsteady. V3 stated, I know they were trying to keep her from eloping but now she is hurt. V3 stated she hated giving R4 those medications because of the effects of the medication. V3 stated you cannot give the elderly residents that much Xanax without causing bigger issues. V3 stated R4 stayed in a wheelchair all day up until she fell. On 5/14/2025 at 10:15AM, V3 stated she was R4's nurse on Saturday 5/10/2024. V3 stated, I did not see the fall as I had run to answer the front door alarm, and it was a family that did not know the code to get out. V3 stated R4 was sitting up against the wall by the Oxygen room near the nurse's station talking with another resident. V3 stated they were keeping R4 in a wheelchair for safety. V3 stated R4 has never had a fall before. V3 stated I had talked with the doctor with my concerns of the medications and contributing to possible falls, but he did not listen, ya know I am only a nurse. V3 stated, I know how those drugs effect the elderly's coordination and balance. V3 stated the Xanax did effect R4's coordination and unsteadiness on her feet. V3 stated the Xanax did make her a lot calmer as far as that goes. V3 stated she never gave R4 a Xanax when it was ordered just as needed. On 5/14/2025 at 9:35AM, V2 (DON) was asked what he knew about R4's fall. V2 stated he seen it on the video. V2 stated R4 was in a wheelchair across from the nurse's station. V2 stated V13 had gone to get a chair for R4 to sit in and when V13 came back around the corner she saw R4 stumble and fall. V2 stated R4 ambulates on her own anyway. V2 stated he told the nurses that if R4 started ambulating and going towards the door, to put her in a wheelchair. V2 stated nobody had reported to him that R4 had an unsteady gait. V2 stated when he left on Friday (5/9/2025), R4 was up ambulating all over the place. V2 was asked what diagnosis was used for the Risperidone medication and V2 stated Dementia with Psychosis. V2 stated since they didn't have a proper diagnosis (the diagnosis of Dementia with Psychosis), they didn't give but one dose. V2 stated Xanax was increased to three times a day. On 5/14/2025 at 10:45AM, V20 (Physician) stated the last time he saw R4 was before the elopement. V20 was asked why he started Xanax routinely on R4. V20 stated, Probably a suggestion to something to stop her from eloping and to make it easier to re-direct her. V20 was asked why he increased the dose of Xanax just 2 days later, V20 stated, I guess it was not doing any good. V20 stated, You normally give Xanax more time to evaluate the effects of the medication and dosage, 2 days is not really enough time to know that but they called and suggested the increase so I must have agreed. I depend on the nurses to assess the residents and make suggestions on what needs to be done. V20 was asked why he ordered Risperidone one time dose on 5/8/2025. V20 stated, I don't recall ordering that but they must have called and suggested and I agreed. V20 was asked why he would agree to the dose of 1mg. V20 stated, I can't imagine ordering that dosage for a patient of her size unless she was being very violent like trying to choke another resident or being aggressive uncontrollably. V20 stated, When I do use anti psychotics like that I always start at the dosage of 0.25mg never 1 mg. V20 stated there may have been miscommunication or he was busy and didn't hear the suggested dose and just agreed. V20 stated that dose was a dangerous dose for R4. V20 was asked what diagnosis he used to justify Risperidone and V20 stated, Dementia with Psychosis. At that time V20 was shown R4's diagnosis on the EMR (electronic medical record) which was Dementia without Psychosis. V20 stated, Well I believe she was showing signs of psychosis, she was hiding in a garage. V20 was asked if he was aware that on 5/7/2025 R4 was using a cane for ambulation. V20 stated, Yes, and I ordered an x-ray of her foot. V20 was asked if he was notified that R4 was then in a wheelchair on 5/8/2025, 5/9/2025 and 5/10/2025. V20 stated, No I was not aware of that. V20 was asked if he was aware that R4 was refusing the Risperidone from the staff and a cop friend of the family came to the facility and talked R4 into taking the medication? V20 stated, No I did not know anything about that either. V20 was asked if he felt like the Xanax could attribute to R4's fall with hip fracture. V20 stated, Yes, it is a high probability. V20 stated, That is why I don't usually use Benzo's (benzodiazepines) in geriatrics because it can affect their gait and other side effects that I don't like. V20 stated I used it this time as that is what they suggested due to anxiety, attempts to leave the facility and that is what the facility suggested. Physician orders were reviewed by EMR with V20 and V20 wanted to know who wrote all of the orders. Orders reviewed and orders were written by V2. V20 wanted to talk with V2 so V2 was summoned to the room at 11:02AM. V2 stated he had called for orders for medications to help with R4's continued exit seeking and anxiety. V20 checked his phone for calls received and validated the calls with the time the orders were placed and did not see any issues. V20 was asked if he was aware R4 was admitted (3/28/2025) with an as needed order for Xanax, V20 stated, I was never called to renew that order and that would have had to be done every 14 days, so I assume the order fell off. At that time R4's orders were reviewed with V20, and the as needed Xanax was discontinued on 5/6/2025. V20 stated, Again I don't like using Benzodiazepines in geriatrics because of the sedation effect. On 5/14/2025 at 12:14PM, a document titled Elopement incident report for R4 with documentation highlighted under subtitle of Notes was presented to this surveyor by V21 (Regional Clinical Director). The documentation highlighted was dated 5/8/2025, and authored by V19, documents 5/8/2025 Due to residents ongoing anxiety and wandering/exit seeking behavior the family requested (V20) be called and asked if there is anything to calm resident down. (V20) notified and initially gave a one time order for Risperidone then however he discontinued that and gave orders for Xanax 0.5mg 3x day. Family/POA and (V15) agreed with this. Resident being monitored for any adverse reaction or unwanted side effects such as gait changes, drowsiness, etc. On 5/9/2025, Resident continues the routine Xanax, and it does appear to be helping. Resident continues to be monitored for any adverse or unwanted side effects, and none are noted. Gait appears at baseline. Resident attended the Mother's Day Tea and interacted well with her family and had a good time. On 5/10/2025 authored by V3, Resident continues routine Xanax. Medication seems to be helping overall with resident's anxiety and behaviors. Resident continues to be monitored for any adverse or unwanted side effects and there have been one noted at this time. Gait appears to continue at her baseline. On 5/14/2025 at 12:18PM, V3 was asked if she assessed R4's gait on 5/10/2025. V3 stated. No, I had them to keep her in a wheelchair because I was worried about her. V3 was asked if she documented on the incident report that gait was at baseline, V3 stated, No and how would I be able to assess her gait if she was in a wheelchair. V3 was shown the document titled Elopement provided by V21 and the section under notes with documentation, on 5/10/2025 authored by V3. V3 reviewed the documentation and stated, I did not write that, someone has written that and put my name on it, and I did not do that. On 5/15/2025 at 12:49PM, V22 (Power of Attorney) and V15 (family member) were interviewed via telephone call and V15 stated R4 is doing better after surgery for hip fracture. V15 was asked if when she was there on 5/8/2025 did she know if R4 took the medication that they were trying to get R4 to take and V15 stated, Yes. V15 was asked if she knew what the medication was and V15 stated, Yes it was Risperdal. V15 stated (R4) kept talking about the police so my brother who was a fire chief called a friend who is a police officer to come and talk with R4. V15 stated, I guess (R4) trusted him because she took the medication for him. V15 was asked if she noticed any change in R4's mental status after the elopement. V15 stated on Thursday (5/8/25) she was sort of out of it and really sleepy. V15 stated she did ok through the Mother's Day event but yes, she had been more drowsy than normal. V15 asked if this surveyor knew exactly how R4 fell, V15 said the facility wasn't really sure. V15 stated she knew they still had one to one staff with R4 but thought that the staff member turned around and R4 stood up and just fell. V15 was asked if R4 was being sedated at the hospital and V15 stated no not really but she did have a sitter up until this morning. V15 stated, we are going back to the facility this evening so I think she will feel better there. R4's document titled Fall Risk Evaluation dated 5/10/2025 at 1:09PM, documents Category: At risk. Level of consciousness/mental state: Intermittent confusion, History of falls: 1-2 in last 3 months, Ambulation: ambulatory/continent. According to the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) website, https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/020272s056,020588s044,021346s033,021444s03lbl.pdf., the drug label for Risperdal (Risperidone) documents Warning: mortality in elderly patients with Dementia-related Pdychosis . Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. Risperdal is not approved for use in patients with dementia-related psychosis. According to the FDA website, https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/018276s052lbl.pdf. The drug label for Xanax documents Geriatric Use: The elderly may be more sensitive to the effects of benzodiazepines. They exhibit higher plasma alprazolam concentrations due to reduced clearance of the drug as compared with a younger population receiving the same doses. The smallest effective dose of XANAX should be used in the elderly to preclude the development of ataxia and oversedation. Dosing in Special Populations In elderly patients, in patients with advanced liver disease or in patients with debilitating disease, the usual starting dose is 0.25 mg, given two or three times daily. This may be gradually increased if needed and tolerated. The elderly may be especially sensitive to the effects of benzodiazepines. If side effects occur at the recommended starting dose, the dose may be lowered. The facility Psychotropic Medication Use policy with revision date of December 2016 documents, Policy statement: Psychotropic medications may be considered for residents after medical, physical, functional, psychological, emotional psychiatric, social and environmental causes of behavioral symptoms have been identified and addressed. Psychotropic medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage for the shortest period of time and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re-review. 1. Residents will only receive psychotropic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and effective. 2. The Attending and Physician and other staff will gather and document information to clarify a resident's behavior, mood, medical condition, specific symptoms, and risk to residents and others. On 5/16/25, Behavior Tracking for R4 was requested. R4's Behavior Tracking documents a start date of 5/14/25 for behaviors of restlessness, makes repetitive statements about wanting to go home, resident gets agitated at times with staff, and wandering. There was no other behavior tracking provided prior to the date of 5/14/25.
Mar 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify a residents responsible party of a change in condition and tr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify a residents responsible party of a change in condition and transport to the emergency room for 1 of 7 residents (R2) reviewed for notification of changes in the sample of 10. The findings include: R2's admission Record documents an admission date of 04/24/24, with diagnoses including: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, type 2 diabetes, history of falling, unspecified atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, major depressive disorder, and suicidal ideations. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicating that R2 is moderately cognitively impaired. On 03/19/25 at 9:16am, V18 (family member) stated on February 26th the facility sent R2 to the hospital around 12:30pm, and she was not notified until 10pm. On 03/19/25 at 2:27pm, V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated when a resident has to be sent to the hospital, the first thing they do is contact the doctor, then the ambulance. V10 stated then they have to make sure the resident and all the paperwork is ready to go. V10 stated then after all of that they contact the family. V10 stated when R2 was sent to the hospital she actually did forget to contact the family, she had multiple incidents that day. V10 stated after she left, she called back to the facility and told the nurse that relieved her that she had forgotten and had her call the family. On 03/18/25 at 10:45am, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated when someone is being sent to the hospital, they first call the doctor, ambulance, and then the family is notified as soon as the resident and paperwork are ready for them to go. R2's Progress Notes document on 02/26/25 at 11:45am, Resident not feeling well, was throwing up dark brown emesis, fruity smelling breath, vitals bp (blood pressure) 108/58 resp (respirations) 16, pulse 105, O2 (oxygen) 98 on 4 liters of oxygen. BS (blood sugar) 136, resident having c/o (complaints of) stomach bothering her, contacted (V9 Physician) who agreed that resident be sent out to ER (Emergency Room). Resident was picked up @ (at) 12:15 via ambulance. R2's Progress Notes document on 02/26/25 at 10:05pm, This nurse called (local hospital) for report on resident. Per Nurse resident has been admitted to (room and bed number). Resident is receiving IV (intravenous) ABTX (antibiotic) for UTI (Urinary Tract Infection), Pancreatitis and Right lower lobe PNE (pneumonia) .POA (Power of Attorney) informed and verbalized understanding. The facility policy titled Change in Resident's Condition/Status with a revision date of May 2017 documents under Policy Statement; Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g., changes in level of care .)
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility to ensure that a resident's wound dressing was changed in accordance with phy...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility to ensure that a resident's wound dressing was changed in accordance with physician's orders for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for wounds in the sample of 10. This past noncompliance occurred from 2/21/25 to 3/06/25. The findings include: R3's admission record documents an admission date of 06/07/2020, with diagnoses including: malignant neoplasm of unspecified site left female breast, infection following a procedure, superficial incisional site, subsequent encounter, and developmental disorder of speech and language, unspecified. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicating R3 is moderately cognitively impaired. R3's electronic medical record documents the following physician's order from an outside specialty physician with an upload date of 02/24/25. This document has a printed fax date and time of 02/21/25 at 02:53pm; Please start one layer of Xeroform to open area on the left mastectomy incision. Cover with gauze and Tegaderm. Complete this daily. Call for any changes or worsening of the area. Please apply triple antibiotic ointment and dry dressing to the drain site opening. May stop dressings once areas are closed. Call for any changes or concerns. R3's February Treatment Administration Record (TAR) with a print date of 03/18/25, documents no treatment/dressing changes were administered to the surgical site on R3's Left breast. R3's March TAR with a print date of 03/18/25 documents the following order with a start date of 03/06/25 and a discontinue date of 03/17/25; apply one layer of xeroform to open area on left mastectomy incision, cover with gauze and Tegaderm once daily call (name of clinic) with any changes (phone number of clinic) orders from (name of clinic) V14 (Physician's Assistant) one time a day for Wound Care Left breast apply xeroform and cover with gauze and Tegaderm. There was no documentation of any treatment or dressing change orders to R3's surgical site of the left breast documented prior to 3/6/25. There were no initials on R3's TAR indicating that the dressing change was completed for the following date 03/08/25, 03/09/25, 03/13/25-3/15/25. R3's Progress Notes documents a Social Service note dated 02/21/2025 at 04:15pm, Took (R3) to (name of clinic) for follow up they sent new orders for some wound care, follow up in two weeks R3's Progress Notes document a Nurse's Note dated 03/06/2025 at 11:16am, contacted (name of clinic) follow up for wound orders not received, orders sent by fax today breast center stated was sent by fax on 2/21/25 orders never received to facility. R3's current Care Plan documents the following focus related to breast surgery with an initiation date of 01/14/25, .had breast cancer and had her breast removed. She has been extra hormonal. R3's Care Plan did not include interventions regarding the treatment or care of R3's surgical site to the left breast. On 03/17/25 at 10:06am, R3, who is alert to person and place, stated she was pretty sure they took good care of her after her procedure. R3 stated she was not sure how long she had the IV (intravenous) antibiotics or a PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) line. R3 stated she wasn't sure how to answer these questions and did not want to get them wrong. R3 stated sometimes her care is not good, but everyone is nice to her. On 03/18/25 at 10:45am, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that V4 (Social Services) schedules all appointments. V2 stated that orders are faxed most of the time and that V4 receives them and is supposed to get them to nursing. V2 stated it is not uncommon for nurses to have to follow-up with her to see what new orders have come from the physician because she will get them and not forward them along. V2 stated V4 is not just transport but also social services and does get overwhelmed at times. V2 stated V4 has rescheduled appointments, sometimes day of because the transportation van is shared between both long term care facilities in town. V2 stated she knew that there had been an issue with getting R3's PICC line placed but she was not the DON at that time and was also not the nurse for R3 and was not sure the details of the situation. On 03/18/2025 at 12:20pm, V14 (Physician's Assistant) stated what was of greater concern for her was R3's dressing was not changed for 13 days. V14 stated her main concern with R3 having this dressing not being changed for this long was that the wound is from a major surgery, that also had cellulitis of the chest wall had not been looked at for 13 days. V14 stated her concerns were further breakdown of the skin under and around the bandage, and that R3 recently had a major infection, and no one was laying eyes on the wound to notice signs or symptoms that it was worsening. V14 stated luckily for R3, she did not suffer any adverse events and her infection did not return or worsen. V14 stated it could have been a bad deal, with cellulitis of the chest wall, it could have gotten much more serious, even to the point of being life threatening. On 03/19/25 at 3:41pm, V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse/Infection Prevention) stated the reason she contacted the outside specialty physician about treatment orders for R3 on 03/06/25, was because the dressing that they had placed on 02/21/25 was hanging off. V3 stated she spoke to V4 (Social Services/Transportation) and asked if dressing orders were received on R3. V4 stated that their computers were down the day of the appointment but that they were going to fax them, but they were never received. V3 stated she called the outside specialty physician for orders, even though the wound looked great. On 03/19/25 at 02:27pm, V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated she was not aware of any wound care/dressing orders not being done according to physician's orders on R3. V10 stated she knew she had a surgery and a dressing change, but was not aware it wasn't being done according to doctor's orders. On 03/20/2025 at 8:37am, V4 (Social Services/Transportation) stated the duties of her job include scheduling appointments and taking residents to appointments. V4 stated if orders are given to her, she will give them to someone in nursing or the DON. V4 stated if orders are faxed, she does not mess with them, they go to the fax machine at the nurse's station and they take care of them. V4 stated she was not given wound orders for R3 the day of 02/21/25 and the Dr's office was supposed to fax them, she told the nurses when they returned they were faxing orders over. V4 stated she knew nothing about it until V3 came and asked her about it about a week later. V4 stated she would not have had anything to do with those orders unless they were handed to her in the office, which they were not. The facility policy titled, Medication and Treatment Orders with a revision date of July 2016 documents under policy statement, Orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing. Prior to the survey date, the facility took the following actions to correct the noncompliance: 1. The facility held a QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) meeting on 03/06/25 with V16 (Regional/Acting Administrator on 03/06/25), V15 (Regional Director of Clinical Operations) and V4 (Social Services) in attendance, V9 (Physician), V2 (DON) and V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse /Infection Prevention) via telephone. QAPI Agenda/Meeting Template documents a goal of add any new orders from outpatient. Under the section Quality of Life/Quality of Care, the first item documents Receiving proper documentation and any new orders from outpatient appointments and documents that re-education was initiated and completed to nursing personnel. Under the section Action Plan it documents under goal, Improved compliance with obtaining notes and re-education and monitoring of effectiveness . 2. The QAPI Agenda/Meeting Template documents, Nursing personnel have received reeducation. A QA (Quality Assurance) tool has been created to monitor deficiency to promote improved quality performance. 3. Inservice documentation for nursing (RN and LPN) and social services shows that all nursing staff were educated on 03/06/25 on the following topics: appointments, documentation, new orders and following physician's orders. 4. Policy reviewed was Medication and Treatment Orders. 5. Plan of Correction lists the corrective action as Resident's treatment orders were obtained, processed and applied. The plan of correction lists all residents have the potential to be affected. This document states that all staff were educated on obtaining proper documentation and any new orders during outpatient appointments; All nursing staff educated on calling the office to follow up if new orders are not received. 6. The DON/Admin/designee will monitor all outpatient appointments daily for 4 weeks to ensure all proper documentation and any new orders were received and processed. Any issues identified will be immediately corrected and reeducation will be offered. Results of the QA tools will be reviewed during the next regularly scheduled QAPI meeting.
Aug 2024 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with ADL's (Activities of Daily Liv...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) to 1 of 3 residents (R157) reviewed for ADL care in the sample of 26. The findings include: R157's admission record notes he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a local out of state hospital. The same document lists some of R157's diagnoses as Unspecified open wound, left ankle, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Acquired absence of Right Leg Below Knee. R1's care plan notes a focus area of ADL self care performance deficit. Some of the listed interventions are bathing: I require (1) staff participation with bathing. Personal Hygiene/oral care: I require (1) staff participation with personal hygiene and oral care. Due to R1 being admitted on [DATE], V3 (Regional Nurse) said that R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) had not been completed. On 8/27/24 at 9:40 am, R157 was observed lying in bed and had 1-2 inches of facial hair. R157 said he does not wear a beard and has been asking and asking to be shaved and he is told they do not have time. R157 was alert and oriented to person, place and time. R1 then stated that staff woke him up at 3 am to get a bed bath. R1 was somewhat upset and said he was sleeping good. R1 said he does not want a bed bath at 2 am, he would prefer it to be on days. On 8/27/24 at 9:50 am, V7 (Infection Preventionist) was observed telling R157 that he just had to ask to get shaved and R157 told her he has asked several times and been told they do not have time. On 8/29/24, at 11:30 am, V6 (family member) removed R157's upper denture. Observation of the denture after it was removed noted that the denture was covered with thick greenish yellow matter. R157 said that no one has cleaned them or offered a cup and tablets to clean them with. On 8/29/24 at 11:35 am, V5 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) said that dentures should be cleaned every night after seeing the dentures. On 8/30/24 at 10:30 am, V3 (Regional Nurse) said she would expect a resident's dentures to be cleaned every night and a resident to be shaved every other day at least or when needed. On 8/27/24 at 9:55 am, V7 said that R157 should have not been woke up at 2 am for a bed bath. V7 said they have so many showers to do, they were just trying to spread them out on shifts. V7 said they will change his shower/bed bath to the day shift. On 8/29/24 at 1:00pm, V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) said that a resident should not be woke up at 2 am for a bed bath and she would expect a resident to be shaved when they needed or wanted it. V2 also said she would expect mouth care to be provided daily also. Document labeled Facility Shower list notes that R157 gets shower/bed bath on Monday and Thursday night shift. Facility Document labeled Dentures, Cleaning and Storing (revised March 2018) notes to provide dentures care before bedtime if the resident will allow. The same document also notes to ask the resident to remove his or her dentures. Instruct the resident to rinse his or her mouth with water. After resident removes dentures, place dentures in an emesis basin or denture cup. take the emesis basin to the sink. Clean the dentures by brushing them with a denture cleaner or toothpaste. Hold the dentures in the palm of hand and over the sink while brushing to prevent them from dropping on the floor. Rinse dentures thoroughly. Fill the denture cup one-half full of fresh water and one-half full of mouthwash or denture tablet. Place the dentures into the denture cup. Take the denture cup and emesis basin to the bedside table. Leave dentures in the cup until the resident is ready to replace them in his or her mouth.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate physician's orders for wound care for 1 of 5 residents (R1...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate physician's orders for wound care for 1 of 5 residents (R157) reviewed for skin conditions in the sample of 26. The findings include: R157's admission record notes he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a local out of state hospital. The same document lists some of R157's diagnoses as Unspecified open wound, left ankle, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Acquired absence of Right Leg Below Knee. Facility Document dated 8/21/24 labeled Admit/Readmit Screener documents R157 has a wound to right front knee measuring 5.2 cm (centimeters) x 4 cm peri wound and a surgical incision to front right knee measuring 0.1 cm x 16 cm x 0.1 cm and an abrasion to left great toe. There was no mention of a wound on the left lateral ankle on the document. R157's discharge documents from a local out of state hospital dated 8/21/24 documents the following orders: Left great toe: Cleanse wound gently with soap and water (no hibiclens or bar soap), paint wound bed with betadine daily, cover with dry gauze and lightly secure with kerlix or conform gauze, remove dressing daily to reapply betadine and change dressing. Wound vac to left lateral ankle. If Vac loses suction or alarms and cannot be troubleshoot, please contact office and listed other facility numbers. If this occurs after hours or if vac alarms for more than 2 hours, please remove Vac dressing and replace with a saline moistened gauze dressing, and next consult placed or message left on voicemail for wound care office. Wound care will follow up on Wednesday (8/21/24) to change wound vac and weekly to reassessment left great toe. Consult/Contact wound care office for questions. Local hospital records with no date note Assessment: 77M s/p ([AGE] year old man status post) right below the knee amputation. Dressings: to remain in place until post-op visit, Follow up appointment: 4 weeks post-op in the office. R157's order summary report dated 8/29/24 note that from 8/21/24-8/27/24, there were no orders regarding wound care on either of the 3 wounds. The same order summary report note on 8/26/24 the following orders were received: Change wound vac Monday, Wednesday and Friday one time a day on odd days with an order date of 8/26/24 and start date of 8/27/24. Order status is noted to be discontinued. Change ABD (abdominal) pad et (and) kerlix daily, keep dry. If wet, change prn every day and night with a order date of 8/26/24 and start date of 8/27/24. Cleanse wound on Right leg BKA (below knee amputation) with antibacterial soap, apply xeroform to incision site and macerated area cover with ABD pads and wrap with kerlix gauze and reapply prostatic sock with an order date of 8/27/24 and a start date of 8/28/24. On 8/27/24 orders for the surgical incision to right BKA cleanse with normal saline or wound cleanser, apply calcium alginate with silver, collagen, crushed Flagyl 250 mg (milligrams), cover with ABD pad and wrap with kerlix. Change daily and prn (as needed) with an order date of 8/27/24 and start date of 8/28/24. Order dated 8/27/24 with a start date of 8/28/24 note orders for wound to left great toe: Cleanse gently with normal saline or wound cleanser, paint wound bed with betadine daily and leave open to air. Order dated 8/27/24 with a start date of 8/30/24 note an order for wound to left lateral ankle: Cleanse with normal saline or wound cleanser, apply foam with negative pressure wound vac at 125 mmHg (millimeters of mercury). Change on Mon-Wed-Fri and prn. R157's TAR (Treatment Administration Record) dated 8/1/24-8/31/24 indicate there was no orders or wound care provided from 8/21/24-8/26/24 to the left lateral ankle, left great toe or Right BKA surgical site. On 8/27/24 at 9:30 am, V7 (Infection Preventionist) said there were no orders on the discharge papers from the hospital for R157. V7 said that R157 was supposed to have a wound vac to his left ankle. V7 said that R157 was supposed to see wound care on 8/21/24, but he was discharged to the facility. V7 said that R157's wife did not want to make the trip to go back to the out of state hospital. V7 said the night of 8/21/24, she was unable to apply the wound vac. V7 said that a wound vac was ordered for R157's left ankle and their wound vac did not fit the tubing, so she called R157's wife and she had one and brought it in the next day. V7 said that the night of admission [DATE]), R157 did not have the wound vac on due to tubing not matching the wound vac. V7 said the wife brought the wound vac in on 8/22/24 and she cleansed it with normal saline and used a kit that was sent by hospital and applied the wound vac. V7 said she could not figure out why no orders were sent and that herself and V5 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) both called the hospital for orders and never received a call back. V7 said she was not aware of any follow up appointment for follow up care with the surgeon. On 8/27/24 at 10:15 am, V4 (local wound provider Nurse Practitioner) said she was looking at R157's wounds while rounding with V7, but could not touch them since she did not have any orders for them. V4 said this was the first time she had looked at R1's wounds and is waiting on orders to be received from the surgeon/physician from the out of state hospital. On 8/27/24 at 11:00 am, V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse) said she admitted R157 to the facility and did not get any orders for wound care. V5 said she did call for them, but did not get a return call back. V5 said she was not aware of any follow up appointments with the surgeon when she admitted him. On 8/29/24 at 1:30pm, V14 (Physician) said it would be his expectation that if the facility did not have wound treatment orders on admission, they would have called him and he could have given orders.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 1 of 1 residents (R26) reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 26. The Findings Include: R26's face sheet documents an admission date of 6/12/2024. The diagnosis on this face sheet includes the following: senile degeneration of brain as of 6/13/24, anxiety disorder as of 6/13/24, Diabetes Mellitus as of 6/13/24, and Tourette's disorder as of 8/27/2024. R26's physician order summary report as of 8/30/24 documents the following medications: Haloperidol 5 milligram (mg) give one tablet by mouth two times a day related to senile degeneration of brain, anxiety disorder unspecified, Lexapro 10mg once a day for signs and symptoms of depression, Lorazepam 0.5mg every four hours as needed for anxiety, Morphine Sulfate 100mg/100 milliters (ml) by mouth every four hours as needed and Trazadone 25mg at bedtime for insomnia. R26's care plan has a focus area for 'risk of insomnia' dated 6/13/24. The goal for this focus area is 'resident achieve/maintain a consistent sleep pattern.' Interventions for this focus area are: evaluate for respiratory distress when laying flat or while sleeping, evaluate sleep pattern, maintain consistent schedule with daily routine, and monitor for factors that may contribute to poor sleep pattern. R26's care plan has a focus area for 'resident uses anti-anxiety medications related to Anxiety disorder' dated 6/13/24. The goal for this focus area is 'The resident will be free from discomfort or adverse reactions related to anti-anxiety therapy through the review date.' The interventions for this focus area are: Administer anti anxiety medications as ordered by physician. Monitor for side effects and effectiveness, monitor/document/report as needed any adverse reactions to anti anxiety therapy: Drowsiness, lack of energy, clumsiness, slow reflexes, slurred speech, confusion and disorientation, depression, dizziness, lightheadedness, impaired thinking and judgment, memory loss, forgetfulness, nausea, stomach upset, blurred or double vision. Unexpected side effects: Mania, hostility, rage, aggressive or impulsive behavior, hallucinations. Monitor/record occurrence of for target behavior symptoms pacing, wandering, disrobing, inappropriate response to verbal communication, violence/aggression towards staff/others and document per facility protocol. On 8/27/24 at 12:15 PM, R26 was observed at lunch in the dining room during the lunch meal service. R26 was in a wheelchair pushed back from the table where his meal was on a tray. R26 made no attempt to eat his lunch meal and was chewing on his clothing protector. On 8/28/24 intermittent observations were made as follows: 11:31 AM, R26 was in the dining room sleeping in his wheel chair, at 12:30 PM, V9 (Minimum Data Set/MDS Coordinator/Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) was attempting to wake R26 up to assist him with his meal, at 1:00 PM, R26 was in his room room with the lights off sleeping soundly. At 2:40 PM, R26 was still sleeping in his bed with the lights off. At 3:30 PM, R26 was still in his bed with the lights off sleeping soundly. On 8/29/24 at 1:15 PM, V11 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) and V12 (CNA) stated, R26 is generally tired, but you can get him to talk and laugh with you too sometimes. V12 stated, R26 seemed tired after lunch today so they put him to bed to rest. On 8/29/24 at 3:00 PM, V17 (CNA) and V18 (CNA) stated that when R26 first was admitted he ate well independently and was more alert, and now it seems that he sleeps a lot and does not eat well and needs assistance and arousal from dozing off during meals times. A consultant pharmacist medication regimen review report dated 8/20/24 documents from the consulting pharmacist the following: The resident is currently receiving Haloperidol that requires a diagnosis of one of the following: schizophrenia, Tourette's syndrome, or Huntington's. On 8/27/24, V15 (Physician) wrote in the diagnosis of Tourette's Syndrome. On 8/29/24 at 1:23 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated the process for gradual dose reduction, or any pharmacy consultation reports with recommendations, starts with the pharmacy monthly medication reviews. V2 stated the pharmacy sends the facility the report with the recommendation for the dose reduction or any other information needed for medications and then she sends it to the physician for review and signature. V2 stated that R26 has not really exhibited any behaviors of Tourette's, he is mainly just combative with staff during care and resistive. V2 stated that he has had outbursts with other residents, but none lately. V2 stated that she realizes some of his behaviors are not tracked and she is working with educating staff on properly documenting resident behaviors. V2 stated that due to R26 being on hospice they have not checked to see if any of his outbursts could be related to any medical issues, including a urinary tract infection, due to hospice not typically doing extra types of tests on residents. On 8/29/24 at 11:09 AM, V15 stated that he received the pharmacy consultation report requesting a diagnosis and while he feels it is part of his dementia. V15 stated that he filled out the pharmacy consultation report from his office. V15 stated that the reports of behaviors that the nursing staff report to him are mainly of him being resistive to care and at times combative. On 8/29/24 at 11:00 AM, V16 (Registered Nurse/Hospice) stated that hospice started the Haloperidol medication due to the staff reporting combative episodes during care and sometimes directed at other residents. V16 stated that she is unaware of any reports, nor has she seen R26 exhibit any Tourette's Syndrome like behaviors. V16 stated that the Haloperidol likely needs to be reduced if he is becoming too tired and lethargic throughout the day. July 2024 behavior tracking for R26 has a problem statement of 'insomnia.' R26 had two days tracked for this concern area in the month on July 10th and 11th. This same behavior tracking has 15 first shift dates with no tracking documented/filled out, 7 second shift dates with no tracking documented/filled out and 20 third shift dates with no tracking documented/filled out. R26 was also tracked for Lorazepam in July 2024 for the problem statement of repeatable concern about wanting to go home. R26 had 13 days with this behavior occurring. R26 had 14 first shift dates with no tracking documented/filled out, 7 second shift dates not documented/filled out, and 20 third shift dates not documented/filled out. R26's August 2024 behavior tracking for Lorazepam for the behavior of 'reputable concern about wanting to go home' had no instances documented of occurring, but had 17 days first shift dates not filled out/documented if behavior occurred, 11 second shift dates not filled out/documented if the behavior occurred, and 14 third shift dates not filled out/documented if the behavior occurred. R26's August 2024 behavior tracking for Haloperidol has the problem statement of 'Cursing at staff' to be tracked. One date is documented of this behavior of cursing at staff is documented. First shift has 13 dates not filled out/documented if this behavior occurred, second shift has 9 dates of not filling out/documenting if this behavior occurred, and third shift has 14 dates not filled out/documented whether this behavior occurred. R26's August 2024 behavior tracking or Trazadone does not have any occurrences of 'insomnia' occurring. First shift has 17 dates not filled out/documenting of this behavior, second shift has 11 dates not filled out/documented on whether this behavior occurred and third shift has 14 dates not filled out/documented on whether this behavior occurred. R26's behavior tracking has no medication filled out for the use of the problem statement of aggressive behavior'. First shift has 16 dates of the behavior tracking not filled out/documented whether the behavior occurred, second shift had 11 dates not filled out/documented if this behavior occurred, and third shift had 14 days not filled out/documented on whether this behavior occurred. According to the National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke the diagnosis guidelines will ask you about the presence of both motor and vocal tics that occur several times a day, every day or intermittently for at least 1 year, onset of tics before age [AGE], and tics not caused by medications, other substances, or medical conditions. These guidelines can be found at https://www.ninds.nih.gov/health-information/disorders/tourette-syndrome#:~:text=Diagnosing%20TS,other%20substances%2C%20or%20medical%20conditions
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled as physician prescribed for 1 (R53) of 1 residents reviewed for controlled medication storage i...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled as physician prescribed for 1 (R53) of 1 residents reviewed for controlled medication storage in the sample of 26. Findings Include: R53's Face Sheet documented an admission date to the facility as 7/18/2024 with diagnosis including anxiety disorder, unspecified, insomnia, unspecified, malignant neoplasm of unspecified site of left female breast. On 8/27/24 at 2:00 PM, observation of the locked medication storage room with V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) observed a white plastic cup containing white pills inside it that had been wrapped around the top portion of the cup with brown self-adhering bandage. The plastic cup had the number 423 written in a black sharpie marker with R53's name on the cup, locked in the narcotic box of the medication room. On 8/27/2024 at 2:03 PM, V2 stated on admission, R53's family brought in her lorazepam 0.5 milligram medications for the facility to use. V2 stated, the facility kept 40 of her lorazepam tablets in her prescription bottle and V8 (Family) had been contacted on the amount of medication that could be on hand at the facility and asked V8 what the family wanted to do with the rest of the medication. V2 stated, V8 requested the facility not to discard the medication and V8 would pick up the medication. V2 stated, R53's lorazepam had been locked up in this plastic cup for over a month. V2 stated, the nurses do attempt to count the lorazepam every night and verbally report it during nurse report in the morning, but there is no documentation log of the medication being counted because it is not the facility's medication. V2 stated, all medications that are classified as a controlled substance should be counted prior to each shift and logged in the narcotic medication book. V2 stated, all medication should be stored in a proper container with appropriate identifying information. On 8/27/2023 at 2:20 PM, V3 (Regional Nurse) stated when medication is brought in from resident families, the policy documents that medications should be sent to the pharmacy to be packaged and all medication should be stored in the proper container with identifying information. On 8/30/2024 at approximately 11:00 AM, V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated, all controlled substances medication should be locked and counted prior to a shift and at the end of the shift. V14 stated, lorazepam is considered a controlled substance and is counted prior to and end of each shift and documented in the controlled substance book. V9 stated, all medication should be stored in the proper container with identifying information on the drug, resident name, physician, etc. R53's Physicians Order Summary dated 7/18/2024 through 9/09/2025 documents Lorazepam 0.5mg every 12 hours as needed for anxiety. The facility policy titled Storage of Medications (revised April 2007) documents under Interpretation and Implementation step 3. Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper or incorrect labels shall be returned to the pharmacy or to the family if there were medications from home. 4. The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy, family if brought in or destroyed. According to https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2010/06/29/2010-15757/dispensing-of-controlled-substances-to-residents-at-long-term-care-facilities under Long Term Care Facilities, 21. U.S.C 829(b) documents Prescriptions are required to contain specific information including: patient name and address; drug name, strength, dosage form, quantity prescribed, directions for use; and name, address, and DEA number of the issuing practitioner. 21 CFR 1306.05(a). All prescriptions for controlled substances must be dated as of, and signed on, the day when issued.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure proper levels of sanitizer were maintained inside the dish machine and bulk stored foods were kept free from potential c...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure proper levels of sanitizer were maintained inside the dish machine and bulk stored foods were kept free from potential contamination. This has the potential to affect all 53 residents residing in the facility. The Findings Include: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 8/27/24 at 8:00 AM a scoop with handle was found in the bulk food bins containing thickener and flour. At this time V13 (Dietary Manager) stated that there are containers right next to these bins that are supposed to be for the scoops. V13 removed the scoops at this time and was going to educate the staff on the proper procedure of not leaving the scoops in the food with the handle touching the food substance. During this same initial tour on 8/27/24 at 8:25 AM, V13 used a sanitizer strip to check the chlorine concentration in the dish machine. No sanitizer was registering in the machine. V13 stated that she would have the maintenance man come and check the machine to determine the issue. At this time V13 stated that there is no log of the sanitizer level kept and it is checked 'every couple days.' V13 was unable to verify the last time the machine was checked for the proper sanitization of dishes. A policy for Dishwashing: Machine Operation dated 2016 documents: The Dining Services staff shall maintain operation of the dishwashing machine according to established procedure and manufacturer guidelines posted or contained in this guideline to ensure effective cleaning and sanitizing of all tableware and equipment used in preparation and service of food.2. Check the dishwashing machine three times weekly and after the sanitizer has been changed. Check the dials to ensure that the wash and rinse cycles are achieving proper temperature per manufacturer guidelines. If a chemical sanitizer is used, check the concentration using the correct test tape for the type of sanitizer in use. If not at the correct hot water temperature or the proper chemical sanitizing concentration, do not proceed to wash dishes. Empty the dishwashing machine, check nozzles and empty bottom screen and restart the dishwashing machine. The Long Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 8/28/24 documents that 53 residents reside in the facility.
Aug 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents are receiving timely assistance ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents are receiving timely assistance with toileting and bathing for 4 of 6 residents (R1, R3, R7, R9) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance in the sample of 6. 1. R1's face sheet dated 08/08/2024 documents an admission date of 03/04/2024 with diagnosis in part of displaced fracture of upper end of right humerus, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, Encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, fracture of right shoulder girdle, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing's. Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in Section C, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating R1 is moderately cognitively impaired. Section GG documents that R1 is dependent for toileting, Shower/bathing and personal hygiene. R1's current care plan dated 04/30/2024 documents R1 has an ADL self-care performance deficit with interventions in part: Bathing, R1 is totally dependent on staff to provide a bath weekly and as needed. Personal Hygiene, R1 requires total assistance with personal hygiene. Toilet use, R1 is totally dependent on staff for toilet use. A grievance from R1 dated 07/1/2024, documents R1 reported she is having issues with staff answering call lights in a timely manner. On 08/07/2024 at 12:00pm, the undated facility Resident Shower List, where resident showers are logged and tracked documents no showers for R1 for the months of June, July, and August. R1's Electronic Medical Record contains a Skin monitoring: Comprehensive CNA (Certified Nurse's Assistant) shower Review (Shower Sheets) for a bed bath on 06/08/2024 and a shower on 06/12/2024. On 08/07/2024 at 2:49pm, V4 (Corporate Nurse) brought shower sheets for R1 dated 06/19, 06/26, 06/29, 07/03, 07/06, 07/10, 07/13, 07/17, 07/19, 07/20, 07/24, 07/27, and 07/31. All of these sheets were signed by V9 (Maintenance/CNA) as the CNA and V2 as the charge nurse. On 8/7/24 at 8:51am R1 was noted to have oily hair. On 08/08/2024 at 08:22am, R1 was noted to have oily hair and to smell of urine. It was also noted that R1 remained in the same clothes on both days. On 08/07/2024 at 10:55am, V7 (Certified Nurse's Assistant/CNA) stated R1 does not like to sit up very long, often she is given a bed bath. V7 stated occasionally she is able to convince R1 to sit in her chair for a minute while she changes her bedding and tidies up her room. On 08/08/2024 at 08:22am, R1, who is alert to person, place and time stated her care here is terrible. R1 stated that they don't come change her, she will lay in pee or poop for hours before she can get someone to change her. R1 stated she is very unhappy with the shower situation, they do not bathe her often, and if they do it is a sponge bath. R1 stated that sometimes she does not want to get up first thing in the morning for a bath, because her body hurts and it's just painful, when she asks about it later, they tell her she refused when it was her bath time. R1 stated that she has not changed clothes for days. R1 stated that she has talked to administration about not answering call lights, it hasn't gotten any better. R1 stated they will change her sheets and bedding if she asks, and there are one or two aides that will ask her if they can do it. R1 stated she had her call light on earlier and someone came in and turned it off and said they would be back. R1 stated this happens often and they do not come back for a long time. 2. R3's face sheet dated 08/08/2024 documents an admission date of 04/20/2023 with diagnosis in part of Urinary Tract Infection, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and disorientation. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in Section C, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating R1 is moderately cognitively impaired. Section GG documents that R3 requires setup or clean up assistance with oral hygiene, substantial/maximum assistance with toileting, shower/bathing and lower body dressing, and Partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene. R3's current care plan dated 06/04/2024 documents R3 has an ADL self-care performance deficit with interventions in part: Check nail length and trim and clean on bath day and as necessary. Bathing, dressing, Personal hygiene/oral care, Toilet use: resident requires 1 staff participation. On 08/07/2024 at 12:00pm, the facility Resident Shower List for June, July, and August 2024, where resident showers are logged and tracked documents R3 received a shower on 06/13, refused 07/01 and 07/04, and received a shower on 07/23, 07/25 and 07/30. R1's Electronic Medical Record contains a Skin monitoring: Comprehensive CNA shower Review (Shower Sheets) for the same dates. On 08/07/2024 at 2:49pm, V4 (Corporate Nurse) brought shower sheets for R3 dated 06/17, 06/20, 06/22, 06/24, 06/27, 07/07, 07/18 All of these sheets were signed by V9 (maintenance/CNA) as the CNA. On 08/07/2024, at 8:47am R3 was observed sitting in her chair in a night gown, her hair was not combed. R3's nails appeared to have dirt under them. On 08/07/ 2024 at 4:09pm, R3, who is alert to person and place, stated the staff takes pretty good care of her but she couldn't remember the last time she had a shower, but she sure would like one. V3 stated she felt greasy, and her hair was a mess. R3 was observed in the same nightgown as earlier, dirty nails and had a slight odor. V3's hair and face appeared oily. On 08/07/2024 at 4:38pm, V11 (Family member) stated she feels like they go through periods off and on where R3 is not getting a shower. V11 stated she will say something to staff about it and they will say R3 refuses, but it will get better for a period of time. V11 stated then it goes back to the same thing. V11 stated they will come in and R3 just looks dirty, sometimes she will be wearing the same clothes from the last time they saw her. V11 stated that she knows it is not uncommon for someone to be in the same outfit because they don't visit every day, but you can just tell that it has been slept in and it just looks dirty and sometimes has crusty stuff on it. V11 stated sometimes they come in and R3 will have very soiled depends, like they are very heavy and full of urine. V11 stated R3 goes through periods of having skin irritation, bilaterally in her groin and under her left breast. V11 stated she knows that is from poor hygiene because it was not an issue prior to R3's decline in being able to care for herself. V11 stated at times they will shower R3 or give her a sponge bath. V11 stated R3 can be resistive at first and say no I do not really want to, especially in the mornings, but we will tell her we want to hug on you, and you have an odor, she will usually get embarrassed and agree to take one. V11 stated R3 is never mean, she just says no I don't feel like it. V11 stated she has spoken with staff about their approach or re-offering it to R3 at a different time when they say she refuses, and they really do not offer much feedback. V11 stated R3 has been getting more frequent Urinary Tract Infections, something that wasn't common before. V11 stated that she knows that is common in Nursing home populations, but the fact that R3 sits in a soiled depends for too long probably also contributes to that. V11 stated there has been a brand new toothbrush in R3's bathroom for over a year that has not been used, she has questioned if they are brushing her teeth and has been met with the same response that she refuses at times. V11 stated her hands and nails appear very dirty often. On 08/08/2024 at 11:16am, R3 was still in the same night gown as the previous day, hair remains uncombed, face, hair and nails still appear dirty. 3. R7's face sheet dated 08/08/2024 documents an admission date of 03/04/2009 with diagnosis in part of nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage and other chronic pain. R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in Section C, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating R7 is moderately cognitively impaired. Section GG documents that R7 is dependent for toileting, Shower/bathing, upper and lower body dressing and personal hygiene's current care plan dated 08/08/2024 documents R7 has an ADL self-care performance deficit with interventions in part: I am unable to bathe independently with interventions of: I prefer bathing in the mornings, one person to assist me with bathing. On 08/07/2024 at 12:00pm, the facility Resident Shower List for June, July, and August 2024, where resident showers are logged and tracked documents R7 received a shower on 06/27, 07/22, and 07/25. R7's Electronic Medical Record contains a Skin monitoring: Comprehensive CNA shower Review (Shower Sheets) for the same dates. On 08/08/2024 at 8:13am, R7 stated they used to shower and shave him what seemed like all the time. R7 stated he actually decided to start growing out his beard because they were shaving him too much. R7 stated lately it is not as often he gets a shower. He stated he will refuse to be shaved at times, but not shower. R7 stated they hardly even ask him anymore; they just assume he doesn't want it. R7 stated he also asks to go to the bathroom when he has to have a bowel movement and they wait until he has an accident and then they are frustrated with him. R7 stated that he doesn't want to make too much of a fuss about it because they say he is demanding, but it is all humiliating. 4. R9's face sheet dated 08/08/2024 documents an admission date of 01/06/2023 with diagnosis in part of chronic pain. R9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in Section C, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06, indicating R9 is severely cognitively impaired. Section GG documents that R9 requires setup or clean up assistance with oral hygiene, supervision or touching assistance with toileting, substantial/maximum assistance shower/bathing and Partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene. R9's current care plan dated 06/04/2024 documents R9 has an ADL self-care performance deficit with interventions in part: assistance with dressing/undressing, assist with oral/dental hygiene, perform self-care if able. On 08/07/2024 at 12:00pm, the facility Resident Shower List for June, July, and August 2024, where resident showers are logged and tracked documents R9 received a shower on 06/29 and 07/21. R9's Electronic Medical Record contains a Skin monitoring: Comprehensive CNA shower Review (Shower Sheets) for 06/30/2024. On 08/07/2024 at 2:49pm, V4 (Corporate Nurse) brought shower sheets for R9 dated 06/03, 06/08, 06/10, 06/15, 06/17, 06/21, 06/26, 07/03, 07/10, 07/13, 07/17, 07/20, 07/24, 07/27, 07/29. All of the shower sheets with the exception on 07/20 were signed by V2 (DON) as the charge nurse. The shower sheet from 07/20 was signed by V9 as the CNA. On 08/08/2024 at 1:39pm, R9 had a slight smell of urine, she had long chin hair, her hair appeared oily, and her scalp was visibly flaky, and her shirt had what appeared to be dried food on it. On 08/07/2024 at 10:53am, V6 (CNA) stated that everyone should get showers two times a week. V6 stated the shower schedule is posted in the bathroom, in a cabinet and at the nurses station. V6 stated if someone refuses, they are to write it on the CNA shower sheet. She stated R1 often takes a bed bath and refuses to get out of bed. V6 stated that sometimes it is difficult to get showers completed on their scheduled day depending on staffing, but for the most part they are done. V6 stated shower sheets are to be done every day that someone is scheduled a shower, whether they take one or not, they are then supposed to put the shower sheets on the clipboard at the desk to be reviewed and scanned in to the chart. On 08/07/2024 at 10:55am, V7 (CNA) stated everyone is to be showered twice a week. V7 stated the shower schedule is on the clipboard at the nurse's station and that is where they are to put the CNA shower sheets when they are completed. V7 stated they are expected to complete one every day that someone is scheduled to have a shower, even if they refuse a shower. V7 stated if they refuse, they are supposed to report it to the nurse and the nurse is supposed to come down and speak with resident. V7 stated they try as hard as they can to get them done as they are supposed to. On 08/07/2024 at 1:30pm, V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse), stated they sign off on the shower sheets that the CNA's place in the folder at the nurse's station and then they go back in there to be scanned in. V5 stated nurses look over them, but to her knowledge they do not ensure that the showers for that day were completed. V5 stated that the CNA has to offer the shower twice and then the nurse must try. V5 stated they do not have to make note of it, it is the CNA's job to document the refusal. On 08/07/2024 at 1:33pm, V3 (Infection Control Nurse) stated that she is responsible for maintaining the shower log. V3 stated she collects the CNA shower sheets from the nurse's station and logs them. V3 stated they started putting them in a file folder about a week and a half ago which was V4's idea because they were, Getting lost. V4 stated they have been having in-services on showers lately, and shower education books were just done and placed in the shower rooms. V4 stated that she logs the shower sheets and then the front desk scans them in. On 8/7/24 at 2:36pm, V2 (Director of Nurse's/DON), stated the transition to the new computer charting system has been difficult. V2 stated their expectation is that they are doing both right now, filing out the shower sheets and charting in the computer. V2 stated recently they were requiring CNA's to have shower sheets signed off on by the charge nurse before they put them in the folder. V2 stated the CNA assigned to the resident's hall is expected to complete the showers, but this has been an issue and they were talking about assigning a specific CNA to a specific resident that way they knew exactly who's responsibility it was. V2 stated if someone refuses, the nurse must go down and also speak with the resident about it. V2 stated she and V3 have been checking in to make sure showers are getting done, and verbal warnings have been given to people not completing them. V2 stated that the shower schedule and the shower education books were placed in the shower rooms after an in-service, but some have been removed due to remodeling the bathrooms. On 08/07/2024 at 2:49pm, V4 (Corporate Nurse) stated there was no book on shower education or a specific policy on showering, the only policy they had on bathing was their general ADL policy. V4 brought a stack of shower sheets in and stated she had retrieved them from various places. On 08/08/2024 at 10:10am, V3 (Infection Prevention Nurse) stated there was no system for showers or tracking them before she and V2 took over and started putting a system in place. V3 stated that everyone knows that the shower sheets are to go on the clipboard, in the folder at the nurse's station. V4 stated that yesterday they started assigning a resident shower to a specific CNA so they could figure out where the problem still remains. On 08/08/2024 at 10:47am, V9 (Maintenance/CNA) stated he does not work the floor often, maybe a couple times a month here and there. V9 stated he was asked to sign a stack of shower sheets yesterday and that he did not give those showers. On 08/08/2024 at 11:25am, V2 (DON) stated that she started her position as DON on June 12, 2024, prior to that the facility had not had a DON for a while. V2 stated she and V9 were asked to sign shower sheets yesterday that they did not give nor were they present for those showers. Facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting with a revision date of March 2018, documents residents who are unable to carry out ADL's independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, Grooming and personal and oral hygiene. This document further states if residents with cognitive impairment or dementia resist care, staff will attempt to identify the underlying cause of the problem and not just assume the resident is refusing or declining care. Approaching the resident in a different way or at a different time or having another staff member speak with the resident may be appropriate.
May 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide wound treatments as ordered for 1 (R1) of 3 residents revie...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide wound treatments as ordered for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for wound treatment in a sample of 3. This past non-compliance occurred between 4/3/24 and 5/12/24. The findings include: R1's admission record documents that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The same admission record also documents some of R1's diagnoses as Lymphedema, not elsewhere classified, Chronic Venous Hypertension (idiopathic) with ulcer of right lower extremity, excoriation (skin picking) disorder. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 3/29/24 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. R2's Care Plan documents a Care Plan Description to include Stasis Ulcer/Venus with a Category listed of Skin. Interventions listed included, provide pillows or other supportive devices to assist with positioning, provide pressure reducing surfaces on bed and chair, and perform wound care as ordered. R1's facility Wound Healing Progress Report documents under Type of Wound/Location, Other: Lymphedema Left Leg - Entire Leg and Venous Ulcer Right Calf with a date identified of 3/29/24. R1's Physician's Order Summary Report documents an order dated 4/2/24 noting bilateral lower extremities - paint areas to bilateral legs with betadine solution and cover with gauze followed by ABD's (absorbant pads), wrap with rolled gauze and secure with coban (self-adherent wrap) starting at base of toes up lower leg to no higher than 2 inches below the bend of the knee. Change two times daily and prn (as needed). R1's TAR (Treatment Administration Record) dated April 2024 documents N (No) on 4/3/24, 4/4/24, 4/7/24, 4/8/24, and 4/9/24. There was no documention found in R1's record stating the reason the treatments were not administered. R1's Physician's Order Summary Report documents an order dated 4/12/24 noting treatment changed to Right lower leg: Cleanse with normal saline, apply maxorb Ag (antimicrobial dressing) to open ulcer and cover with ABD pad. Paint remainder of open/weeping area with betadine solution. Cover with gauze followed by ABD. Wrap with tolled gauze and secure with coban starting at the base of the toes up lower leg to no higher than 2 inches. Left lower leg: Cleanse with normal saline, paint open/weeping areas with betadine solution. Cover with gauze followed by ABD's. Wrap with rolled gauze and secure with coban starting at the base of toes up lower leg to no higher than 2 inches below the bend of the knee. R1's TARs dated April 2024 documents for the right lower leg, 4/13/24, 4/14/24, 4/15/24, 4/17/24, 4/18/24, 4/24/24, 4/27/24 all have N (no) documented in the 8:00 AM treatment time. The left lower leg also has N documented on the 4/13/24, 4/14/24, 4/15/24, 4/17/24, 4/18/24, 4/24/24, 4/27/24 times. There was no documention found in R1's record stating the reason the treatments were not administered. R1's Physician's Order Summary Report documents an order dated 4/19/24 for the right lower leg: Cleanse with normal saline, apply calcium alginate to open ulcer and cover with ABD pad. Paint remander of open/weeping area with betadine solution. Cover with gauze followed by ABDs. Wrap with rolled gauze and secure with coban starting at the base of the toes up lower leg to no higher than 2 inches below the bend of the knee. Change two times daily and prn. R1's TAR dated April 2024 documents N on 4/24/24 and 4/27/24. There was no documention found in R1's record stating the reason the treatments were not administered. R1's Physician Order Report documents an order dated 5/1/24 for the left lower leg: Cleanse with normal saline, paint open/weeping areas with betadine solution. Cover with gauze followed by ABDs. Wrap with rolled gauze and secure with coban, starting at the base of the toes up lower leg to no higher to 2 inches below the bend of the knee. Change two times daily and prn. There was no treatment noted on R1's May 2024 TARs for the left lower leg. R1's Physician's Order Summary Report documents an order dated 5/1/24 for the right lower extremity: Cleanse with normal saline, apply calcium alginate to open ulcer and cover with ABD pad. Paint remainder of open/weeping area with betadine solution. Cover with gauze followed by ABDs. Wrap with rolled gauze and secure with coban starting at the base of the toes up lower leg to no higher than 2 inches below the bend of the knee. Change two times daily and prn. R1's May 2024 TAR has no documentation that the treatment was done on the following days: 5/1/24 at 1600 (4:00 pm), 5/2/24 at 1600, 5/3/24, 5/4/24, 5/6/24, 5/7/24, 5/8/24, 5/9/24 at 1600, 5/10/24, 5/11/24, and 5/12/24. On 5/16/24 at 1:30 PM, R1 stated staff do not change his dressing like they are supposed to. R1 said he does good to get it changed once a day and sometimes it doesn't get changed at all. R1 said he went 6 days last week and it did not get changed. On 5/16/24 at 2:00 PM, V2 (Director of Nurses/DON) stated that a N on the TARs means the treatment was not given and a progress note should be done to explain why it was not done. On 5/17/24 at 11:30 AM, V2 said she was made aware of problems with dressing changes not being done on R1 and did an inservice to staff. V2 said she is working on fixing the problem. On 5/16/24 at 11:45 AM, V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN/Infection Preventionist) said there were a couple of days she did not do R1's dressing change. V3 said the lymphedema clinic called on the 15th of May and said the dressing changes were not being done. V3 said she did not know she could chart in the TARS (Treatment Administration Record) and has never signed a dressing change off on them. V3 also said that R1's wounds on both legs have improved alot since his admission. R1's Wound Healing Progress Report note on admission date of 3/29/24 documents R1's left leg wound measured 20.00 x 61.20 and right calf measured 20.00 x 57.50 x 0.30. On 5/16/24 measurements of the left leg were noted to be 18.70 x 40.20 and the right calf measured 10.00 x 20.00 x 0.20. The Facility Wound Care Policy documents under the heading Documentation: The following should be recorded in the resident's medical record: 1. The type of wound care given. 2. The date and time the wound care was given. 3. The position in which the resident was placed. 4. The name and title of the individual performing the wound care. 5. Any change in the resident's condition. 6. All assessment data (i.e., wound bed color, size, drainage, etc.) obtained when inspecting the wound. 7. How the resident tolerated the procedure. 8. Any problems or complaints made by the resident related to the procedure. 9. If the resident refused the treatment and the reason(s) why. 10. The signature and title of the person recording the data. Under Reporting, the Wound Care policy documents: 1. Notify the supervisor if the resident refuses the wound care. 2. Report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice. Prior to the survey date, the facility implemented the following actions to correct the deficient practice: 1. A Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting was held on 5/13/24. Staff in attendance included the Medical Director, Administrator, Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, Regional Clinical Nurse and MDS Specialist. An action plan was developed to include goals of all medication/treatment administration records to be completed in their entirety in real time and all treatment changes will be completed according to the current physician order. The action documented included education of all nursing staff and monitoring to be completed x (times) 4 weeks. 2. Nursing In-Service/Education was provided to all nursing staff documenting the importance of ensuring all dressing changes are completed as ordered; if at any time for any reason an appointment for wound clinic is missed, nurses are required to perform treatments as ordered, the importance of completing the MAR/TAR documentation daily, and importance of completing weekly skin assessments. 3. Measures put into place/systematic changes to ensure the deficient practice does not recur: DON or Designee to monitor dressing changes daily for 1 week then 3 times weekly for 2 weeks, then weekly for 2 weeks.
Nov 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers/baths to dependent residents for 5 of 5 residents (...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers/baths to dependent residents for 5 of 5 residents (R5, R7, R12, R13 and R14) reviewed for showers in a sample of 14. Findings include: An undated facility document titled Showers Dayshift/Nightshift documented R12, R5, R14, were all scheduled for showers on Tuesday (11/28/23) and R7 was scheduled for a shower on Wednesday (11/29/2023). R13's name is noted to be absent from the shower schedule. On 11/29/2023 at 10:20am, R14 said she was supposed to get a shower last night (Tuesday evening) but the staff did not give her one. R14 said she has not been getting her showers as scheduled and hasn't for a long time. According to R14's EHR (Electronic Health Record) R14 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Acquired absence of left leg above the knee, Diabetes Mellitus type 2 and Rheumatoid Arthritis. R14's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documents a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 14 out of 15 total, indicating R14 is cognitively intact. This same assessment documents R14 has been assessed as being dependent on staff for showering/bathing activities. Three months of shower care documentation for R14 was requested from V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing) showed R14 received showers on 9/2/23, 9/23/23, 10/27/23 and 11/19/23. A total of 4 showers in three months. No other shower documentation could be provided. On 11/29/2023 at 10:30am, R12 said she was supposed to get a shower last night (Tuesday evening) but the staff never came to give her one. R12 said she has not been getting her scheduled showers for a long time. According to R12's EHR, R12 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, muscle weakness, shortness of breath, difficulty walking among others. On R12's MDS assessment dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 14 out of 15 total indicating R12 is cognitively intact. This same assessment documents R12 is assessed as needing substantial/maximal assistance and staff does more than half the needed work to complete the shower/bath activity. Three months of shower care documentation for R12 was requested from V1 and V2 and showed R13 received showers on 9/6/23, 9/22/23, 9/30/23, 10/4/23, 11/15/23, 11/19/23, 11/21/23. A total of 7 showers in three months. No other shower documentation could be provided. On 11/29/2023 at 11:02am, R13 said he was admitted to this facility on 10/27/2023 and he has only had two showers since he was admitted . R13 said he has not been given any bed baths either. R13 said he doesn't even know when he is supposed to receive a shower because nobody has ever told him. According to R13's admission face sheet, located in R13's EHR, R13 was admitted on [DATE] with pectinate diagnoses of Colon Cancer, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, unsteadiness on feet and need for assistance with personal care. R13's MDS assessment dated [DATE]documents a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, which indicates R13 is cognitively intact. This same assessment documents R13 needs partial/moderate assistance from staff to complete shower/bath activities. On 11/29/23, shower care documentation for R13 was requested from V1 and V2 and showed R13 received a shower on 11/7/23 and 11/28/23. No other shower documentation could be provided. On 11/29/2023 at 11:20am, R7 said she has not been getting her scheduled showers and she was supposed to get showered today but she hasn't heard anything about it as of yet and doubts she will get one. According to R7's admission face sheet in her EHR, R7 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Liver Cirrhosis, Anxiety Disorder, abnormal weight gain, and vitamin deficiencies among others. R7's MDS assessment dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 13 out of 15 which indicates R7 is cognitively intact. This same assessment documents R7 needs partial/moderate assistance from staff to complete showering/bath activities. Three months of shower care documentation was requested from V1 and V2 and showed R7 received showers on 9/4/23 and 11/14/23. A total of two showers in three months. No other shower documentation could be provided. On 11/29/2023 at 9:00am, R5 said he has a hard time getting in the shower due to his large size so it is more comfortable for him to get a bed bath. R5 said he does not get bathed very often and does not get bathed twice per week. According to R5's admission face sheet in his EHR, R5 was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of severe morbid obesity, Stroke with left sided paralysis, unsteady on feet and weakness among others. R5's MDS assessment dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 15 out of 15 which indicates R5 in cognitively intact. This same assessment documents R5 is dependent on staff for all showering/bat activities. Two months of shower/bath care documentation was requested from V1 and V2 and showed R5 received bed baths on 10/3/23, 10/6/23, 10/18/23, 10/20/23, 11/10/23and 11/25/23. A total of 6 bed baths in two months. No other shower documentation could be provided. On 11/29/2023 at 9:30am, V6 and V7 (both Certified Nursing Assistants/CNAs) said the facility does not have any shampoo or body soap in stock for resident care. V6 and V7 both said a few residents purchase their own bath soap and shampoo, but the CNAs have been buying shampoo and soap and bringing it to the facility for resident care but their supply had run out and no one had brought any in for a long time. V6 and V7 both said a few weeks ago the facility ran out of wash cloths but V2 (Director of Nursing) went out and bought a bunch and brought them into the facility for resident care use. V6 and V7 together were observed opening the facility's only resident care supply closet located on the 300 hall where no shampoo or body soap could be located. V6 and V7 looked in all three of the resident showering rooms and no shampoo or bath soap was located. On 11/29/2023 at 10:05am, V1 (Administrator) was made aware of the facility being out of body soap and shampoo for resident care. V1 along with V6 and V7 searched the facility but no body soap or shampoo for resident care could be found. V1 said she has only been employed at this facility for the past two weeks and did not know they were out of body soap and shampoo. The facility policy titled Bath, Shower/ Tub (revision date February 2018) under Equipment and Supplies documents in part The following equipment and supplies will be necessary when performing this procedure .2. Lotion, deodorant, etc.face cloth and bath towels.
Jul 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0604 (Tag F0604)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to identify a harness device as a physical restraint and ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to identify a harness device as a physical restraint and care plan for this device for 1 of 1 resident (R57) reviewed for physical restraints in the sample of 30. Findings Include: R57's Face Sheet printed 07/23/23 documents an admission date to the facility as 09/12/22. R57's face sheet documents current diagnoses in part as Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation, Anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition, abscess of salivary gland, iron deficiency anemia, muscle weakness, sarcoidosis of other sites, hypokalemia, other constipation, unsteadiness on feet, pain unspecified, mixed hyperlipidemia. R57's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10, indicating moderate impairment. The same assessment Section G Functional Status documents R57 requires extensive assist of two with transfers and bed mobility. The MDS further documents no range of motion impairment in her upper or lower extremities. Section P of the same MDS documents that R57 has no restraints. R57's Physician Order sheet documents an order on 09/23/23 -Per therapy recommendation position aid to utilize positioning top torso harness when in wheelchair. R57's Physician Order sheet for July 2023 documents an order on 09/23/22, Per therapy recommendation position aid to utilize positioning top torso harness when in wheelchair. Order does not clarify how long the device should be applied for during the day and if it should be removed for any period of time. R57's Current Care Plan documents a problem area of At Risk for Falls with a start date of 09/12/22, interventions document on 09/22/23 Lower Back of Residents Wheelchair and on 09/26/22 New Positioning Harness Provided to Resident. R57's Care Plan does not document usage of any physical restraints. R57's Physical Restraint assessment dated [DATE] documents in part, Mobility-Total Care, Reason for Device per therapy recommendation on 09/23/23 upper torso support to be utilized when resident is up in her wheelchair as a safety and comfort measure due to resident's very poor core strength to be able to hold herself up when sitting upright in the chair. Support device does not restrict resident's freedom of movement or normal access to her body. When is device used- when resident is up during the day. Cognition- confused at all times. Physical Functioning -No Decline in Physical Function. Current Physical Status- tolerating well and appears to be comfortable. Device does not restrict resident's freedom of movement or normal access to body. Is resident physically able to release the device-No. Is resident cognitively impaired- Yes. Is the device a restraint- No. Has any less restrictive devices listed been tried- Personal alarm. Gradual and Systematic reduction program not checked. Completed by V27 (Regional Nurse). On 07/17/23 at 9:00 AM, R57 was sitting up in wheelchair in room with blue harness device on which went over R57's shoulders across her waist and in between the peri area all in one piece. The blue harness device has two large clamps the adjoin together to lock the device, one going vertically holding the waist area together and the other horizontally holding the shoulder and peri area together. R57 was asleep in wheelchair with her head leaning backwards. On 07/17/23 at 10:15 AM, R57 was sitting in her wheelchair in her room with the same blue harness device on. R57 was asleep in the wheelchair with her head leaning down. On 07/17/23 at 12:26 PM, R57 was sitting up at the dining room table being assisted by V19 (Certified Nurse Assistant). The same blue harness device was in place during the meal and was not removed. On 07/17/23 at 1:45 PM, V19 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) and V17 (CNA) both stated R57 wears the blue harness device when she is up in her wheelchair. Both stated they remove the device every two hours for 15 minutes if not longer during the day. V17 and V19 both stated they usually remove the device during meals, when doing care such as toileting, showers or when laying her down for a nap. On 07/18/23 at 10:00 AM, R57 was sitting up in her room, with same blue harness device on. R57 was asleep in wheelchair with head leaning back. On 07/19/23 at 12:00 PM, R57 was sitting in the dining room at the table with her food tray in front of her. R57 was asleep at the table. The blue Harness device was removed during meal. V25 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) was assisting R57 with her meal. On 07/19/23 at 12:43 PM, when V27 (Corporate Nurse) brought the restraint assessments for R57, V27 stated they don't have any restraints, they have only positioning devices in the facility. V27 said R57 doesn't have a restraint, she has a positioning device on. When V27 was asked if R57 could remove the device, V27 stated she wasn't sure and was going to check. During the investigation V27 did not give a response as to whether R57 could remove the blue harness device. On 07/19/23 at 1:45 PM, V25 (CNA) stated R57 uses the blue harness device when she is up in her wheelchair. V25 said they will remove the blue harness device every 2 hours for at least 15 minutes when she has it on. V25 stated she does not know of a place to document the removal times of the device. V25 said they usually keep track of it. On 07/19/23 at 1:51 PM, V11 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated the blue harness device for R57 is used as a positioning aid. V11 stated staff will remove the device every two hours for at least 15 minutes when R57 has the device on. V11 stated R57 is unable to remove the device on her own. V11 said it could be called a restraint because R57 can't remove it. V11 said she did have training on the device, but unsure when this training was. On 07/19/23 at 1:55 PM, as this surveyor entered R57's room with V11, V2 (Director of Nurses/DON) was looking at the clips on R57's blue harness device. V2 was trying to see if R57 could remove the device. V2 stated R57 was unable to remove the device on her own. V2 said she did notice the large clips to the back of the wheelchair that hold the blue harness device in place. V2 said she knows some of these devices can be considered a restraint if the resident is unable to remove it on their own. On 07/20/23 at 10:30 AM, R57 was asleep in her wheelchair in her room with blue harness device on. On 07/20/23 at 11:01 AM, V22 (Physician) stated he is familiar with R57 and her blue harness device. V22 stated the blue harness device is used to help with postural support for R57, who tends to lean forward often. V22 did not know if R57 could remove the device on her own. V22 said R57 has a dx of Dementia and trouble with her cognition. V22 stated he doesn't believe the blue harness device to be a restraint but more of a postural support. V22 said he doesn't think there would be any negative outcomes related to the device. V22 was unsure if there was a plan to remove the device or not. V22 stated if there was a plan to remove it or decrease it that it would probably be in the care plan. V22 was unaware of how often it was to be removed or applied. V22 said he thought that would also be in the care plan. On 07/20/23 at 12:28PM, V27 (Regional Nurse) stated they did Physical Restraint assessments on the blue harness device to prove that it is was not a physical restraint for R57. V27 said they also use the Physical Restraint Assessments to justify why they are using the blue harness device. The facility then reviews the blue harness device quarterly, to see if the device should be continued or if something else would be more appropriate. V27 said they also review any needed adjustment to the device or wheelchair. V27 stated they remove the device every 2 hours for at least 15 minutes to help reduce pressure points on the R57. V27 said she believes the device is released during odd hours. She was unsure if there was any place to document the monitoring of the device such as when it was last removed. On 07/20/23 at 1:02PM, V25 (CNA) and V19 (CNA) demonstrated how to remove the device from R57's wheelchair. V19 went behind the wheelchair grabbed one of the clips. V19 had to use both hands to remove one clip. V19 then removed the other clip using both of her hands. V25 and V19 stated R57 has only had the device she is currently using around 3 weeks or so. V25 stated R57 used to have a different device that didn't cover R57 as much. V25 grabbed another device that was sitting on R57's nightstand. The other device only covered the shoulders and waist area. It did not attach between the peri area. V19 nor V25 knew when or why they changed the devices from an upper torso device to a full body device. V19 stated she documents the times she releases the blue harness device. V19 pulled out a piece of paper that had times on it when she removed the device. V19 stated she doesn't know of anywhere else to document the removal times. On 07/20/23 at 2:00PM, V27 (Corporate Nurse) stated she doesn't know where the other device R57 currently has on came from. V27 did see the upper torso device on R57's nightstand and said that was the device that R57 should be using. V27 was unaware where the new device came from. V27 said she would investigate the new device and see where it came from. Facility Use of Restraint Policy with a revised date of April 2017 documents in part, Policy statement- Restraint shall only be used for the safety and well-being of the resident(s) and only after other alternatives have been tried. Unsuccessfully. Restraint shall only be used to treat the resident's medical symptoms and never for discipline or staff convenience, or for the prevention of falls. When the use of restraint is indicated, the least restrictive alternative will be used for the least amount of time necessary, and the ongoing re-evaluation for the need for restraints will be documented. Policy Interpretation and Implementation. 1. Physical Restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or restricts normal access to one's body. 2. The definition of a restraint is based on the functional status of the resident and not the device. If the resident cannot remove a device in the same manner in which staff has applied it given that resident's physical condition (i.e., side rails are put back down, rather than climbed over) and this restricts his/her typical, wanted, ability to change position or place, that device is considered a restraint 17. Care Plan for residents in restraints will reflect interventions that address not only the immediate medical symptom(s), but the underlying problems that may be causing the symptom(s). Review of an article titled, Use of physical restraint in nursing homes: clinical-ethical considerations, dated March 2006, and found at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2564468/ states, Physical restraint can be defined as any device, material or equipment attached to or near a person's body and which cannot be controlled or easily removed by the person and which deliberately prevents or is deliberately intended to prevent a person's free body movement to a position of choice and/or a person's normal access to their body. Examples of physical restraint include vests, straps/belts, limb ties, wheelchair bars and brakes, chairs that tip backwards, tucking in sheets too tightly, and bedside rails.
Aug 2022 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Advanced Directives were correctly documented for 1 (R52) of...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Advanced Directives were correctly documented for 1 (R52) of 1 resident reviewed for Advanced Directives in the sample of 28. Findings Include: R52's IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) Uniform Practitioner Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Form dated by the Authorized Practitioner on [DATE] documented an Advanced Directive status of Attempt Resuscitation/CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation). Review of R52's active Physician Orders dated for [DATE] documents R52's Advanced Directive Status as DNR (do not resuscitate). On [DATE] at 08:45 AM, R52's current Physician Orders dated for the month of [DATE] as well as the POLST form were reviewed with V2 (Regional Nurse). V2 acknowledged the POLST form and Physician Order's Advanced Directive status do not match, although they should. V2 stated she will get the error corrected. The facility policy titled Advanced Directives with a revision date of [DATE] stated, Advanced directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physicians orders to provide laboratory services for 1 (R41) of 2 residents reviewed for hospice services in the sample of 28. Find...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physicians orders to provide laboratory services for 1 (R41) of 2 residents reviewed for hospice services in the sample of 28. Findings Include: R41's Physician Orders dated for August 2022 documented R41 was receiving Warfarin Sodium 3 mg (milligrams) by mouth daily with a diagnosis of unspecified atrial fibrillation with an order date of 8/1/22. R41 is documented as being under hospice services. R41's Medical Treatment Orders provided by the hospice company documented an order dated 8/1/22 for Lab Blood Test for: PT with INR on 8/5/22. R41's Clinical Record documented no PT/INR (Prothrombin Time / International Normalized Ratio) laboratory results to assess Warfarin Sodium effects. Progress Notes in R41's Clinical Record documented an entry dated 8/1/22 which stated, New orders received to D/C (discontinue) Glucagon, Novolog, multivitamin, atorvastatin, Levemir, and Eliquis. Resident is to continue Albuterol, Metformin, Nitroglycerin, Lomotil, Benadryl, Acetaminophen-Cod #3, Aspirin, Senna, Colace, Citalopram, Mirtazapine, Metoprolol, and Keppra. All Accuchecks (blood glucose monitoring) are to be discontinued as well. New orders received Coumadin (Warfarin Sodium) 3mg PO (by mouth) QD (every day) .Nurse stated that V6 (Hospice Registered Nurse) hospice will be at facility to obtain blood draws r/t (related to) coumadin therapy. Comfort measures only to be initiated. On 08/10/22 at 12:23 PM, V7 (Hospice admission Nurse) stated she does not see where Hospice has drawn any PT/INR, although V7 stated she does see in R41's orders that (R41) is on Warfarin Sodium. V7 stated that with R41's Warfarin Sodium, labs should be being drawn. On 08/10/22 at 12:40 PM, V7 returned a call to the facility and stated after further investigation, an order to draw a PT/INR was missed and had been ordered to be drawn on 8/5/22 by hospice staff. V7 stated she is not sure why hospice staff didn't draw it. V7 stated hospice will come to the facility either today or tomorrow to get it drawn, but recognizes it was an error on hospice's part. On 8/11/22 at 12:15 PM, V2 (Regional Nurse) stated that R41's Warfarin Sodium has been discontinued effective today. V2 acknowledges that despite the Warfarin Sodium now being discontinued, the PT/INR was not completed by hospice staff as ordered on 8/5/22. The undated Hospice of Southern Illinois contract documents on page 27 under the section titled, Patient Service Agreement Delineation of Responsibility for Patient Care and Statement of Responsibility for Extra Charge, that hospice with provide laboratory services.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to care plan for and consistently offer/provide Range of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to care plan for and consistently offer/provide Range of Motion services to treat and/or prevent a reduction in range of motion for 1 (R52) of 3 residents reviewed for Range of Motion Services in the sample of 28. Findings Include: R52's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in Section G0400B that R52 has limited Range of Motion to her bilateral lower extremities. The same MDS documents in the following sections, O0500A: Range of motion (passive): number of days- 0. O0500B: Range of motion (active): number of days- 0. R52 is also documented as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Score of 15, indicating she is cognitively intact. On 08/09/22 at 10:14 AM, R52 stated she does not currently receive any therapy or ROM (Range of Motion) services. On 8/11/22 at 10:49 AM, R52 again confirmed she does not receive any therapy or ROM services. R52 stated she can move her arms fine but has trouble moving her legs because she's old and fat. R52 stated she's not so much worried about her joints getting stiff, again because she is old, but would like to be able to get to the point she could utilize and propel a wheel chair by herself. On 8/11/22 at 10:45 AM, V5 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) confirmed she is familiar with R52. V5 stated that R52 is not in any therapy or Range of Motion program that she is aware of. V5 stated that R52 does refuse care at times, so she is unsure if R52 would be compliant to participate in a program. On 08/12/22 at 09:40 AM, although requested during the survey, V2 (Regional Nurse) stated she has no further information to provide regarding Range of Motion services for R52. R52's current plan of care in its entirety does not document a plan in place for Range of Motion Services despite R52's documented limited Range of Motion. The care plan also has no plan noted regarding an evaluation for ROM services or to address R52's potential refusals to participate in a ROM program. An email communication from V3 (Business Office Manager) received on 8/12/22 at 5:37PM (after exiting the survey) documents that when reviewing the tags with management team, V12 (MDS Coordinator/Care Plan Coordinator) stated that she has ROM on R52, adding that she went to the August CNA book to pull the current month and into the facility's electronic medical records system where the June and July months were scanned. V3 documented in the email that these documents were attached. The attached documents titled Restorative Nursing Flow Record were reviewed for the months of June, July, and August 2022. Each document has two portions noting a program for PROM (Passive Range of Motion) on one form and for AAROM (Assisted Active Range of Motion) on another form. The problem documents Decline in ADL (Activities of Daily Living) or ROM. The goal listed notes Will show no decline in ROM. The approaches listed document: 1. Tell resident what you are doing. 2. Do (PROM) to all extremities and joints upper and lower explaining what you are doing and what you are doing next; (for the PROM portion of the document) or Guide AAROM to all extremities and joints upper and lower explaining what you are doing and what you are doing next (for the AAROM portion of the document) 4. Praise Resident upon task completion. The bottom of the document lists Summary: 2x (times) daily x 7 days. The June 2022 form documents all refusals from 6/1/22 - 6/31/22 (although there is not a 31st day of June) for the minutes/number of times goal accomplished on day shift (6AM-2PM). The evening shift (2-10PM is marked out and 6PM-6AM is written in) documents refusals for the dates of 6/1, 6/2, and 6/3, and the dates of 6/5, 6/6, 6/11, 6/12, 6/13, 6/15, 6/19, 6/22-23, and 6/25 through 6/30/22 are blank, indicating no ROM services were offered or completed. The July 2022 form documents several refusals as well, but is blank for the dates of 7/28, 7/30, 7/31 on day shift and has 0's entered on evening shift for the dates of 7/17, 7/18, 7/19, and 7/26 through 7/31. The July Restorative Nursing Flow record also had the following handwritten note at the bottom of the PROM document: Refused to do ROM due to Fibromyalgia, and the following handwritten note at the bottom of the AAROM document: Res refuse for CNA's to touch legs & feet, said she has Fibromyalgia. These statements have no staff signature or initials to indicate who wrote the notes. The August 2022 form documents all refusals for every day up to survey exit on 8/12/22, with the exception of blanks on both the PROM and AAROM portions for day shift on 8/2 and 8/3, and for the evening shift on 8/10. R52 and facility staff were unable to be interviewed regarding the documented refusals, the 0's, and the blank sections of the document since this evidence was not presented until after survey exit on 8/12/22. Although requested as part of the survey process, there were no observations of R52 receiving ROM services daily throughout the course of the survey from 8/9/22 thorough 8/12/22. The facility policy titled Resident Mobility and Range of Motion with a revision date of July 2017 documents, 2. Residents with limited range of motion will receive treatment and services to increase and/or prevent a further decrease in ROM.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to prevent falls...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to prevent falls for 2 of 2 (R16 and R48) residents reviewed for accidents in the sample of 28. Findings Include: R48's facility Face Sheet dated 8/11/22 documents R48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include congestive heart failure, acute pulmonary edema, and vitamin deficiency. R48's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 07/22/22 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 14, which indicates R48 is cognitively intact. R48's facility care plan with a start date of 6/20/2022 documents a care plan description of History of Falling with interventions that include Assist with transfers and ambulation (6/12/20), Bed in lowest position while occupied (6/12/2020), Ensure room is clutter free (6/12/2020), Introduce to call light, water pitcher, and room (6/12/2020), Keep adaptive devices within reach (6/12/2020), Keep personal items in reach: call light, remote, water, glasses, etc. (6/12/2020), Observe for unsafe actions and intervene (6/12/2020), Verbally remind resident not to ambulate without assistance (6/12/2020), Physical Therapy to evaluate (6/12/2020), Occupational Therapy to evaluate (6/12/2020), Apply bright colored tape to call light as a reminder to call for help before transferring (8/14/2020), Encourage resident to use wheelchair when going outside to the gazebo (5/17/2021), Apply non- skid strips to floor in front of toilet (5/17/2022), Apply non-skid strips beside bed R/T (related to) 6/4/2022), Check pants for length and sizes proper length (6/24/2022). R48's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] documents a score of 19 which indicates R48 is at high risk for falls. R48's facility Incident Investigations document the following; 4/17/22-R48 hit his left fifth finger in the bathroom that resulted in a fracture to his left fifth finger, with a new intervention documented of place a night light in the bathroom to help guide resident and also apply nonskid strips to floor next to toilet to prevent slipping. 5/17/21- R48 had fall in bathroom that resulted in fractured ribs, with a new intervention documented as The new plan is to apply nonskid strips to the floor. 6/4/22- R48 had fall in hallway with no documented injury, with a new intervention documented as nonskid strips beside bed. 6/24/2022- R48 had a fall in the hallway which resulted in a left hip fracture, with a new intervention documented as check his pant in closet for right length and size. On 08/11/22 at 10:18 AM, this surveyor observed R48's room with V2 (Regional Nurse) present. There were no nonskid strips observed on the floor by R48's bed and/or in the bathroom. There was no bright colored tape observed on R48's call light. V2 stated she would verify the accuracy of R48's fall care plan. On 08/11/22 at 12:12 PM, V2 (Regional Nurse) stated the interventions of non-skid strips by the bed and toilet and colored tape on the call light were not being implemented and should have been. On 8/12/22 at 10:06 AM, V10 (RN) stated she was the Director of Nurses at the time of R48's falls in April and May of 2022. V10 stated both falls occurred in the same bathroom located in R48's room. V10 stated when R48 fell on 4/17/2022 they placed the non-slip strips in front of the toilet and when R48 fell on 5/17/2022 they placed the nonskid strips in front of the sink since he had been standing in front of the sink when he fell. V10 stated they always talk about each incident in morning meeting and then put the interventions in place after the meeting. V10 stated she believes the strips may have been removed when they waxed the floors recently. On this same date at this same time this surveyor observed R48's bathroom with V10 and there were no nonskid strips in front of his sink. Reviewed R48's care plan with V10 and she stated she wasn't sure why the nonskid strips in front of the sink weren't listed on the care plan and the only place the interventions would be documented would be on the care plan and the incident investigation. On 8/12/22 at 10:15 AM V11 (Maintenance Director) stated all of the nonskid strips were pulled up when they waxed the floors approximately two months ago. V11 stated he remembers placing nonskid strips on the floor in front of R48's sink in the past but couldn't remember when that was. On 8/12/2022 at 10:20 AM, this surveyor reviewed R48's care plan with V12 (MDS/Care Plan Coordinator) and she stated there were no interventions documented in R48's care plan after the fall on 4/17/2022. V12 stated she wasn't doing the fall interventions at that time, but she should have checked to ensure all interventions were documented and were accurate. V12 then brought this surveyor a form titled Individual Intervention Log with individual interventions listed for R48 that included an intervention dated 4/17/22 Apply nonskid strips next to toilet, night light in bathroom and 5/17/22 apply nonskid strips to floor in front of sink. On 8/12/22 at 11:04 AM, V2 (Regional Nurse) stated she would expect R48's care plan interventions to be updated and implemented. 2. R16's facility Face Sheet dated 8/11/22 documents R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease and anorexia. R16's MDS dated [DATE] documents R16 has a BIMS score of 04 which indicates R16 has a severe cognitive impairment. R16's care plan documents a care area dated 12/30/2016 of At Risk For Falls with interventions that include assist with transfers and ambulation, introduce to call light, water pitcher, and room, keep adaptive devices within reach, keep personal items within reach, observe for unsafe actions and intervene, wheelchair for locomotion, bed in lowest position when occupied, ensure room is clutter free, verbally remind not to ambulate without assistance, Physical therapy to evaluate, apply non skin strips to floor in front of resident toilet, apply brake extenders with bright colored tape to wheelchair, apply bright colored tape to residents call light, extend nonskid strips to floor the length of bed, physician to review medications, apply bright colored tape to call light in residents room, apply grab bar to bed, restorative toileting program, lower back of wheelchair, change mattress to canoe mattress, apply anti roll backs onto wheelchair, replace nonskid strips beside bed, and remove bedside table away from bed. R16's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents a score of 21, which indicates R16 is at high risk for falls. R16's incident investigations documents the following; 3/7/22 R16 was found lying on the floor in his room with lacerations to his face and documents a new intervention to lower the back of his wheelchair. 4/25/22 R16 was found lying on his right side next to his bed with skin tears and a new intervention documented to change his mattress to a canoe mattress. 5/4/22 R16 was found lying on the floor with his wheelchair to his back and lacerations on his cheek and hand and documents a new intervention of applying anti-rollback to his wheelchair. 7/4/22 R16 was observed lowering himself to the floor with a new intervention to add nonskid strips beside R16's bed. 7/6/22 R16 was observed on the floor with a skin tear to his eyebrow and a new intervention to move his bedside table away from his bed. On 08/11/22 at 12:52 PM, this surveyor observed R16's room with V2 (Regional Nurse) present and did not see bright colored tape on R16's call light by his bed or in his bathroom. V2 stated she was sure he had it on there and then observed bright pink tape on R16's roommates call light. V2 asked a staff member who R16 was and verified which bed R16 was in. After confirming who R16 was and what bed R16 was in, V2 stated R16's call light by his bed and in his bathroom did not have colored tape and should have. V2 stated she would get it fixed. The facility Falls and Fall Risk, managing policy dated March 2018 documents Based on previous evaluation and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. Under Resident-centered approaches to managing falls and fall risk the policy documents 1. The staff, with the input of the attending physician, will implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factor(s) of falls for each resident at risk for with a history of falls .5. If falling recurs despite initial interventions, staff will implement additional or different interventions, or indicate why the current approach remains relevant . Under Monitoring Subsequent Falls and Fall Risk the policy documents, 1. The staff will monitor and document each resident's response to interventions intended to reduce falling or the risks of falling.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure catheter care was provided per current standard...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure catheter care was provided per current standards of practice for 1 of 2 (R40) residents reviewed for catheter care in the sample of 28. Findings Include: R40's face sheet dated 8/11/22 documents R40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include obstructive and reflux uropathy, painful micturition, benign prostatic hyperplasia, acute kidney failure, diverticulum of bladder, and hydronephrosis. R40's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/29/2022 documents R40 has modified independence for cognitive skills. R40's care plan dated 04/15/2022 documents a care area of At risk for complications with foley catheter. The care plan includes the following interventions, bowel and bladder training if applicable, administer medications as ordered, foley catheter care as ordered, notify primary physician if any changes in condition, observed for pain, indigestion, and abdominal distention, observe for urinary retention, observe for signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection such as burning, dysuria, increased frequency, odor, hematuria, etc., D/C (discontinue) F/C (foley catheter) after completing 2 weeks of bladder training and monitor for urinary retention. R40's Physician Orders for the month of August 2022 documents an active diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection, site not specified. On 8/11/22 at 10:30 AM, V4 (CNA) was observed providing catheter care to R40 with V2 (Regional Nurse) present. V4 was observed washing, rinsing and drying the skin surrounding the penis following current standards of practice. V4 sanitized her hands and changed her gloves appropriately. V4 then washed the catheter tubing starting at the insertion site and wiping downward. V4 then used the same rag and wiped again starting at the insertion site and wiping downward and upward. V4 repeated the same process when rinsing and drying the catheter tubing. At 10:52 PM, when asked if that was her normal procedure for providing catheter care V4 stated it was not. V4 stated that she normally would wipe from the insertion site down and never go back over the area that has already been wiped. On this same date at this same time, V2 (Regional Nurse) stated she would expect V4 to wipe from the insertion site downward and not to wipe toward the insertion site. V2 stated she would do immediate training with V4. The facility Catheter Care, Urinary policy dated 9/2014 documents, The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections . The policy documents under Steps in the Procedure .17. Use a clean washcloth with warm water and soap to cleanse and rinse the catheter from insertion site to approximately four inches outward.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed per current standard...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed per current standards of practice during wound treatment for 1 (R3) of 4 residents reviewed for infection control in the sample of 28. Findings Include: R3's facility face sheet dated 8/11/22 documents R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Parkinson's Disease, Overactive bladder, and Insomnia. R3's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/29/22 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 02, which indicates R3 has a severe cognitive impairment. R3's facility wound assessments dated 8/11/22 documents orders to clean shear areas of right inner thigh and right posterior thigh with normal saline, apply collagen, and cover with a dry dressing. On 8/11/22 at 2:08 PM, V8 (LPN) was observed with V9 (RN) and V2 (Regional Nurse) both present during the observation. V8 was administering treatment to the shear areas on R3's bilateral lower extremities. V8 cleaned the area on R3's left lower extremity, doffed her gloves and donned new gloves, then applied collagen and a dry dressing to the area. V8 doffed her gloves and donned new gloves and cleaned the area on R3's right lower extremity, V8 doffed her gloves and donned new gloves and then applied collagen and a dry dressing. V8 did not hand sanitize or wash her hands after doffing her gloves and before donning clean gloves throughout the observation. On 8/11/22 at 3:30 PM, reviewed with V8 (LPN) that she did not hand sanitize between glove changes during the observation and V8 stated she was nervous and that was why she hadn't hand sanitized between glove changes, but she normally does. Spoke with V2 (Regional Nurse) on this same date at this same time and she stated she would expect staff to hand sanitize between glove changes. The facility Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy dated 8/2015 documents, The facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections .7. Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or, alternatively, soap .and water for the following situations: .g. Before handling clean or soiled dressings, gauze pads, etc l. After contact with objects .in the immediate vicinity of the resident; m. After removing gloves 8. Hand hygiene is the final step after removing and disposing of personal protective equipment.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 22 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • Grade F (13/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
  • • 100% turnover. Very high, 52 points above average. Constant new faces learning your loved one's needs.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 13/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Duquoin Nursing & Rehab's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns DUQUOIN NURSING & REHAB an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Duquoin Nursing & Rehab Staffed?

CMS rates DUQUOIN NURSING & REHAB's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 100%, which is 53 percentage points above the Illinois average of 47%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 100%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Duquoin Nursing & Rehab?

State health inspectors documented 22 deficiencies at DUQUOIN NURSING & REHAB during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, and 20 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Duquoin Nursing & Rehab?

DUQUOIN NURSING & REHAB is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 72 certified beds and approximately 47 residents (about 65% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in DU QUOIN, Illinois.

How Does Duquoin Nursing & Rehab Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, DUQUOIN NURSING & REHAB's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (100%) is significantly higher than the state average of 47%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Duquoin Nursing & Rehab?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Duquoin Nursing & Rehab Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, DUQUOIN NURSING & REHAB has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Duquoin Nursing & Rehab Stick Around?

Staff turnover at DUQUOIN NURSING & REHAB is high. At 100%, the facility is 53 percentage points above the Illinois average of 47%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 100%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Duquoin Nursing & Rehab Ever Fined?

DUQUOIN NURSING & REHAB has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Duquoin Nursing & Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?

DUQUOIN NURSING & REHAB is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.