ARC AT EL PASO

555 EAST CLAY, EL PASO, IL 61738 (309) 527-6240
For profit - Limited Liability company 65 Beds ARCADIA CARE Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
21/100
#325 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: March 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

ARC at El Paso currently has a Trust Grade of F, which indicates significant concerns about the quality of care and services provided. Ranking #325 out of 665 facilities in Illinois places it in the top half of the state, but it falls #4 out of 5 in Woodford County, meaning only one local option is better. The facility's condition is worsening, with reported issues increasing from 7 in 2024 to 16 in 2025. Staffing is a notable weakness, with a poor rating of 1 out of 5 stars and reports of failing to provide eight consecutive hours of Registered Nurse coverage daily, which can impact resident care. Specific incidents include a resident at risk of elopement leaving the facility unnoticed and the kitchen failing to maintain proper food safety standards, highlighting serious areas of concern despite having excellent quality measures in place.

Trust Score
F
21/100
In Illinois
#325/665
Top 48%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
7 → 16 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
45% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$8,994 in fines. Lower than most Illinois facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 24 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
27 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 7 issues
2025: 16 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below Illinois average (2.5)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 45%

Near Illinois avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $8,994

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: ARCADIA CARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 27 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening
Sept 2025 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain resident rooms in a clean and safe manner for four residents (R6, R8, R12, and R13) of four reviewed for safe, clean ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain resident rooms in a clean and safe manner for four residents (R6, R8, R12, and R13) of four reviewed for safe, clean and homelike environment in a sample of 15.Findings Include:Facility's Maintenance Director Job Description dated 3/2024 documents: The primary purpose of the Maintenance Director is to plan, organize, develop, and direct the overall operation of the Maintenance Department in accordance with current, federal, state and local standards, guidelines, and regulations governing our facility, and as may be directed by the Administrator, to assure that our facility is maintained in a safe and comfortable manner.On 9/3/25 at 1:30 PM V1 stated he is unable to locate a policy for cleaning the air conditioner units in resident rooms.On 9/3/25 at 9:35 AM The AC (Air Conditioner) units in R6 and R13's room is located in the wall under the window. There are foam tubes around AC unit with a quarter sized hole where daylight can be seen. The vent slats of AC unit have multiple pinpoint black spots on them. V3 (Maintenance Director) stated probably mildew. Units are cleaned two times per season to prevent mildew build up, but he is unsure if there is a policy. On 9/3/25 at 10:21AM R6 and R13's AC unit has multiple black pinpoint spots on vent slats.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed obtain physician ordered weekly weights for one resident of three residents (R1) reviewed for weights in a sample of 15. Findings Include:The f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed obtain physician ordered weekly weights for one resident of three residents (R1) reviewed for weights in a sample of 15. Findings Include:The facility's Significant Weight Gain or Loss Policy dated 02/2025 documents, All residents will be weighed monthly unless physician order indicates differently.R1's physician's orders, dated 9/5/25, document weekly weights were ordered to begin for R1 on 6/23/25. R1 also has orders to receive the following medications for the diagnosis of congestive heart failure: Torsemide 20mg (milligrams) by mouth daily, Diltiazem 300mg by mouth daily, Metoprolol Succinate ER 50mg by mouth daily, and Aldactone 12.5mg by mouth.On 9/3/25 at 11:17 AM, R1 stated she has not been getting weighed because the machine used to weigh her has been broken.R1's Weight and Vitals Summary dated 9/3/25 documents from 6/23/25 to 8/17/25 weights were only obtained on the following dates: 6/23/25 (419.8 pounds), 7/1/25 (416 pounds), and 7/7/25 (415 pounds).On 9/3/25 at 9:38 AM, V1 (Administrator) verified the facility has three mechanical lifts, and the mechanical lift with the scale attached has not been functioning since 7/10/25.On 9/3/25 at 11:15 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) confirmed R1 had not been weighed from 7/8/25 through 9/3/25.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement new interventions after falls and failed to c...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement new interventions after falls and failed to complete a thorough post fall assessment for three of three residents (R2, R4 and R5.) reviewed for falls in a sample of 15. Findings include: 1. R2's medical record documents that R2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include but not limited to unspecified dementia, moderate without behavioral disturbance, cerebral infarction and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. R2's documentation Un-witnessed fall dated 8/13/25 filled out by V2 (Director of Nursing) documents resident self-transferred from toilet resulting fall. Resident lying on left side of shower room floor. R2's documentation Un-witnessed fall dated 8/13/25 filled out by V2 (DON) documents under Mental status that resident was disoriented, but wnl (within normal limits) for this resident, oriented to person and oriented to situation were marked. The areas of resident did call for help, resident was able to call for help and call light was within reach were not marked.R2's documentation ~Un-witnessed fall dated 8/13/25 filled out by V2 (DON) has a documentation area marked Predisposing Physiological Factors that had Weakness/Fainted, Forgets to use call light and fragile skin marked. The same area had resident was standing, resident was lying, resident was sitting areas available and none were marked. R2's Unwitnessed fall dated 8/13/25 filled out by V2 (DON) Predisposing Physiological Factors documentation area also had antihistamine use as an area available and it was not marked. R2's Physician Order Sheet dated August 2025 documents R2 receives Hydroxyzine (antihistamine) 10 mg (milligrams) every 8 hours as needed. The facility could not provide Medication Administration Record for August to include any use of this antihistamine for review. R2's Unwitnessed fall dated 8/13/25 filled out by V2 (DON) Predisposing Physiological Factors documentation had Anti-hypertensive use as an area available and it was not marked. R2's Physician Order Sheet dated August 2025 documents that R2 receives Metoprolol (anti-hypertensive) Tartrate 50 mg twice daily.R2's Un-witnessed fall dated 8/13/25 filled out by V2 (DON) Predisposing Physiological Factors documentation had an Anti-depressant use are available to be marked. R2's Physician Order Sheet dated August 2025 documents R2 receives Sertraline (anti-depressant) 25 mg daily. Throughout the survey R2 was wearing glasses and did not answer questions appropriately. R2's Un-witnessed fall dated 8/13/25 filled out by V2 (DON) Predisposing Physiological Factors documentation had areas for impaired vision, wears glasses, was wearing glasses. None of these areas were marked. R2's Un-witnessed fall dated 8/13/25 filled out by V2 (DON) Predisposing Physiological Factors documentation had an area for restorative programs that was not marked. R2's current Care plan dated 3/24/25 documents R2 is on a restorative ambulation program, restorative dressing and grooming program dated 7/20/25, and Restorative AROM (Active Range of Motion) program dated 7/20/25.R2's Un-witnessed fall dated 8/13/25 filled out by V2 (DON) had Predisposing Situation Factors as listed Increased agitation, other, recent room change, side rails up, using cane, using wheeled walker, none, change in sleep patterns, recently sleeping less than usual, combative, restless, wandering, recent LOA (leave of absence ) with family, other recent fall, padded rails, Geri sleeves, other (describe), large groups, reaching, restrained, staff approach, using walker, wanderer, resistive to care, recent over sleeping, agitated at the time of fall, hallucinations at time of fall, sundowns, recent blood draw, combative with care and previous skin tears or bruises. None of these areas were marked. R2's Nurse's Notes dated 8/14/25 at 4:00 PM document that the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) met to discuss R2's fall and the new intervention to implement was Anticipate resident's toileting needs. Offer assistance to toilet before and after each meal. R2's current care plan implemented 08/01/2025 and last updated 8/14/25 documents R2 is at risk for falls related to confusion, gait/balance problems, self-ambulating to restroom, fracture of right hip and acute pain right hip. Interventions for R2's fall risk document anticipate and meet the resident's needs dated 8/1/25 and anticipate and offer assistance with needs with toileting throughout the night. On 9/5/25 at 12:45 PM V6 (Care Plan Coordinator) confirmed R2 already had an intervention in place on her fall plan to anticipate her needs and to anticipate her toileting needs. V6 stated, That isn't very different. 2. R4's Medical Record documents that she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include but not limited to unspecified dementia, anxiety and fracture in thoracic spine. R4's Un-witnessed fall dated 6/14/25 filled out by V18 (LPN) documents on 6/14/25 at 5:00 AM R4 was found on the floor at the foot of opposite bed. R4's Un-witnessed fall dated 6/14/25 filled out by V18 has a Mental Status section had area marked that documented disoriented, but wnl (within normal limits) for this resident. The Mental Status section also had sections for resident was able to call for help, resident did call for help and call light was within reach that were not marked.R4's Un-witnessed fall dated 6/14/25 filled out by V18 had Predisposing Physiological Factors that only had wears glasses marked. The form did not have Osteoporosis marked. R4's Physician Order Sheet dated June 2025 documents a diagnosis of age related osteoporosis. The form did not have Discomfort/Pain marked. R4's Physician Order Sheet dated June 2025 documents Gabapentin 1000 mg (milligrams) twice daily (an anticonvulsant medication used to treat seizures and nerve pain) for spinal stenosis and Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (narcotic) 5-325 mg every 4 hours as needed for pain. The form did not have Anti-hypertensive use marked. R4's Physician Order Sheet for June 2025 documents Metoprolol Tartrate (Anti-hypertensive) 25 mg twice daily for hypertension.R4's Un-witnessed fall dated 6/14/25 filled out by V18 had Predisposing Situation Factors listed as active exit seeker, ambulating with assist, behavior symptoms, during transfer, increased agitation, other, admitted within last 72 hours, ambulating without assist, dislikes roommate, improper footwear, large groups and reaching. None of these areas were marked. R4's Un-witnessed all dated 6/14/25 filled out by V18 had Predisposing Situations Factors listed as recent room changes, side rails up, using cane, using wheeled walker, none, change in sleep patterns, recently sleeping less than usual, combative, restless, wandering, recent LOA (leave of absence) with family, other recent fall, padded rails, geri sleeves, other (describe), restrained, staff approach, using walker, wanderer, resistive to care, recent over sleeping, agitated at the time of the fall, hallucinations at the time of the fall, sundown, recent IV use, recent blood draw, long fingernails, combative with care and previous skin tears or bruises. None of the predisposing situations factors were assessed/marked. R4's current Care Plan initiated 8/7/25 last updated on 8/11/25 documents, Floor bed (42 inch) with floor mats of equal height obtained. Ensure bed in lowest position to floor and bed mat at bedside while in bed to establish a larger safe space for resident while in bed. On 8/3/25 at 10:30 AM V6 stated that the bed listed on the care plan is a floor bed that sits directly on the floor. V6 confirmed that R4 had a regular bed with a floor mat that was slid underneath the bed. The resident was not in the bed during the observation. V6 stated, I don't know why that isn't a floor bed in her room. R4's Nurse's Notes dated 6/17/25 at 10:24 AM document that the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) determined the root cause of R4's fall on 6/14/25 was that R4 attempted to self-transfer with no assistance. The new intervention to be put in place was to encourage resident to participate in activities when restless. R4's current Care Plan initiated 8/7/25 last updated 8/11/25 documents that R4 is at risk for falls related to impaired gait and stability, unaware of safety needs, poor judgement, daily use of pain and psychotropic medications and attempts to self-transfer from bed. R4's intervention dated 8/7/25 documents, encourage the resident to participate in activities that promote exercise, physical activity for strengthening and improved mobility. On 8/3/25 at 10:30 AM V6 (Care Plan Coordinator) stated, encouraging people who fall to do activities is pretty standard, they need to build up strength and they are less likely to try to self-transfer if they are out amongst a group of people. V6 stated she didn't know where the intervention of encouraging R4 to participate in activities came from, a fall or a high risk for falling. 3. R5's Medical Record documents that she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include but not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, abnormalities of gait and mobility and osteoporosis. R5's Un-witnessed fall dated 5/16/25 filled out by V18 (LPN) documents that R5 was found on the floor sitting on her bottom next to her bed. R5's Un-witnessed fall dated 5/16/25 filled out by V18 had an area labeled mental status that oriented to person was marked. The areas available for resident did call for help, resident was able to call for help, and call light was within reach were not assessed/marked. R5's Un-witnessed fall dated 5/16/25 filled out by V18 had a section Predisposing Environmental Factors with the following areas listed ; clutter, fall alarm, noise, other (describe), poor lighting, uneven floor, none, bedspread or blanket, cords, resident to resident contact, crowding, furniture, other, pets, rugs/carpeting, wet floor, slick floor, clothing or shoes, other personal items, and there was already a safety intervention in place. None of these areas were assessed/marked.R5's Un-witnessed fall dated 5/16/25 filled out by V18 had a section Predisposing physiological factors with the following areas listed: confused, drowsy, gait imbalance, impaired memory, new/signs of infection, recent change in cognition, recent illness, current UTI (Urinary Tract Infection), functional loss, hypotensive, incontinent, other, recent change in medications/new medications and sedated. None of these area were assessed/marked. R5's Un-witnessed fall dated 5/16/25 filled out by V18 (RN) had a section Predisposing Physiological Factors with Forgets to use call light marked. Restorative Programs was not marked. R4's current care plan dated 1/31/25 documents that R4 is on a restorative dressing/grooming program and also a restorative walking program. R5's Un-witnessed fall dated 5/16/25 filled out by V18 had a section Predisposing Situation Factors with areas listed as: active exit seeker, ambulating with assist, behavior symptoms, during transfer, increased agitation, admitted within last 72 hours, ambulating without assist, dislike roommate, improper footwear and large groups. No areas were assessed/marked. R5's Un-witnessed fall dated 5/16/25 filled out by V18 had Predisposing Situation Factors with areas listed as: other, recent room change, side rails up, using cane, using wheeled walker, none, change in sleep patterns, recently sleeping less than usual, combative, restless, wandering, recent LOA (Leave of absence) with family, other recent fall, padded rails, geri sleeves, other (describe) reaching, restrained, staff approach, using walker, wanderer, resistive to care, recent over sleeping, agitated at time of fall, hallucination at time of fall, sundown, recent IV use, recent blood draw, long fingernails, combative with care, previous skin tears or bruises. None of these areas were assessed/marked. On 9/5/25 at 9:30 AM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, All of these blank areas area addressed with a different assessment (72 hour monitoring). V2 was unable to provide a 72 hour monitoring form or any assessment that documented the predisposing physiological and environmental factors for R2, R4 or R5 throughout the survey. The Facility's Fall Prevention Program policy dated 5/2022 documents the purpose of the policy is to assure the safety of all residents in the facility, when possible. the program will include measure which determine the individual needs of each resident by assessing the risk of falls and implementation of appropriate interventions to provide necessary supervision and assistive devices are utilized as necessary. Quality Assurance Program will monitor the program to assure ongoing effectiveness. The fall Prevention Program includes the following components: methods to identify risk factors, methods to identify residents at risk immediate change in interventions that were successful documentation requirements Care plan incorporates identification of all risk/issue, addresses each fall, interventions are changed with each fall, as appropriate, preventative measures.The Facility's Fall Prevention Program documents a fall risk assessment will be performed by a licensed nurse at the time of admission. The assessment tool will incorporate current clinical practice guidelines. A fall risk assessment will be performed at least quarterly and with each significant change in mental or functional condition and after any fall incident.
Aug 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent staff to resident verbal abuse for two of three residents (R2 and R3) reviewed for abuse in a sample of three. Findings include:The...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent staff to resident verbal abuse for two of three residents (R2 and R3) reviewed for abuse in a sample of three. Findings include:The facility's 24-hour Abuse Investigation Report, dated 7/16/25, documents V1, Administrator, was informed V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant), alleged cussing and yelling at a resident (R3) during care. V4 was suspended immediately pending investigation.V10's, Certified Nursing Assistant, signed statement, dated 7/17/25, documents R3 put on her call light. V4 said, Why did you have me pull you the F K up in the bed? This form also documents V4 is rough towards residents.On 8/19/25 at 3:00pm, V10, Certified Nursing Assistant, stated V4 answered R3's call light and wanted to be pulled up. V10 stated he heard V4 say Why the F k do you want me to pull you up, when all you do is slide right back down? V4 stated he used several other curse words while he was in the room. V10 stated he told the nurse right away. On 8/19/25 at 12:30pm, V1, Administrator verified he did not consider V4 cussing at R3 verbal abuse. V1 also stated the second allegation was not founded because V4 quit before the investigation could be completed. V1 stated corporate makes the final decisions concerning the allegations of abuse. V11's Certified Nursing Assistant, signed statement dated 7/17/25, documents V4 can be kind of rude to residents and use curse words and yell at them.R2's statement, undated, documents the CNA said, I need to get up. I told him I did not want to get up. It seemed to make him mad. He pushed down on my hands and said we got to go, hurry up.On 8/18/25 at 10:00am, R2 stated V4, Certified Nursing Assistant, was attempting to get her out of bed one morning. R2 stated she did not want to get up, so she told him no. R2 stated V4 came in and held her arms down to make her get dressed. R2 stated she continued to refuse. R2 verified V4 was rough while attempting to get her dressed. R2 stated she told the next shift what happened.On 8/19/25 at 11:00am, V4 stated he was suspended twice for allegations of abuse. V4 stated the first time was because of an allegation of him cussing at a resident. V4 stated instead of a three-day suspension, it was nine days, because he had to retake the abuse, customer service training. V4 stated the second time was because of being rough with a resident. V4 stated he stayed over to help the day shift and was told everyone had to get up for breakfast. V4 stated R2 kept refusing, so then he began to persuade her to get up. V4 stated he was just tired of all the allegations and quit.The facility's Final Abuse Investigation, dated 7/30/25, documents R2 stated, The tall male CNA, (V4) with tattoos, was rough with her while trying to get her out of bed for the day. R2 stated, I kept telling him I don't want to get out of bed, and it seemed to make him mad. This form documents V4 was suspended immediately pending an investigation, but V4 voluntarily terminated his position effective 7/26/25.The facility's Abuse Prevention and Reporting policy, revised 9/2024, documents the facility prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents. Abuse means any physical or mental injury or sexual assault inflicted upon a resident other than by accidental means. This form documents verbal abuse may be considered to be a type of abuse. Verbal abuse includes the use of oral, written, or gestured communication, or sounds, to residents within hearing distance, regardless of age, ability to comprehend, or disability.
Jul 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's haircut was done safely for 1 of 5 residents (R1...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's haircut was done safely for 1 of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for safety in the sample of 5. The findings include: On 7/8/25 at 9:17 AM, R1 was seated in a wheelchair in his room. R1 had a full beard and partially bald head. R1 stated he received a hair and beard cut a couple of weeks ago and was all cut up during the process. R1 said a female staff member (name unknown) wheeled him into the beauty shop and just started in on me with hair clippers. R1 said the staff member took the guard piece off the clippers during the process and cut him under his chin. R1 said he hollered and yelled quit!. R1 said the staff member 'kept right on with what she was doing', and he felt like she didn't care. R1 said she moved to the back of his head with the clippers, and it was hurting him there too. On 7/8/25 at 9:39 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated R1 was given a haircut a few weeks ago by a CNA. V1 said when the facility beautician was out on medical leave, the aides cut R1's hair and beard. V1 said V9 (CNA) took it upon herself to wheel R1 into the beauty shop and use electric clippers to trim his beard and hair. V1 said V9 is not a trained beautician, and she should not have been giving haircuts to any resident. V1 said as far as he knew, none of the CNAs are licensed beauticians. On 7/8/25 at 10:09 AM, V10 (R1's daughter) stated R1 was complaining to her about a haircut he had received from a staff member (V9). V10 said the facility knows she does not want V9 caring for R1. V10 said she feels like V9 rushes R1 during cares and does not like him. V10 said R1 is very sensitive to who can cut his hair. V10 said several other aides told her R1 was cut up during the haircut by V9. V10 said only beauticians are allowed to cut his hair, but it was so bad this time another aide (V4) had to go back over it and fix it. V10 said she is okay with the aides cutting R1's hair if it is not V9. On 7/8/25 at 10:50 AM, V4 (CNA) stated she heard R1 yelling stop it from the beauty shop a few weeks ago. V4 said she did not go and see what was happening but could tell that R1 was upset and agitated. V4 said she spoke with R1 about 30 minutes later and was told V9 just cut his hair and beard. V4 said it was horrible and uneven. R1 had a large red area on the back of his neck that looked like razor rash. The skin was all red and patchy behind his ear and under his neck. R1 had razor nicks under his neck. V4 said the family has allowed her to cut R1's hair in the past so she did her best to recut his hair that same day. On 7/8/25 at 10:24 AM, V3 (CNA) said V9 was accused of cutting R1 during a haircut and 'yes that is exactly what happened'. V3 said she spoke with R1 the day after it happened, and R1 was grumpy. V3 stated R1 was asked what happened and R1 replied, She cut my g*# d*#m hair! R1 said (V9) just started in ripping off my skin. I was yelling for her to stop but she kept right on going. V3 said she took R1 down to the administration office and showed V1 his neck and head. V3 said R1 had red lines under his beard and his skin was cut behind his ear. R1 said the marks were from the clipper V9 used on him. V3 said the family only wants someone to cut R1's hair that is capable. V3 said the family does allow V4 to cut him because she knows what she is doing. On 7/8/25 at 11:16 AM, V5 (CNA) said she saw R1 the day V9 cut his hair. R1's neck was nicked up and he had a red rash going up the back of his neck, into his hair line. V5 said she asked what happened and R1 said V9 took the guard off the hair clippers and that is when he got cut. On 7/8/25 at 11:40 AM, V6 (CNA) said she was walking past the beauty shop and saw V9 giving R1 a hair and beard cut. V6 said everything looked normal at that time. V6 said she saw R1 later in the same day and he was in a down mood. R1 told her V9 cut him during the haircut. V6 said she saw a rash behind his ears and a razor nick on his neck. On 7/8/25 at 1:26 PM, V9 (CNA) stated she was talking with R1 after lunch a few weeks ago and something came up about his hair. V9 said R1 was fine if I cut it for him. V9 wheeled R1 into the beauty shop and got a set of clippers out. V9 said she asked R1 what size blade he wanted (R1 is cognitively impaired) and R1 asked for a big one. V9 said R1 picked the cover he wanted as well. V9 said she cut his beard and hair. V9 said she saw a rash on the back of his head after his hair had been cut off, so she left that area alone. V9 said she did not notice the rash until after she cut his hair. V9 said she did nick R1's neck while cutting under there and he said ouch. V9 denied R1 ever yelling out to stop. R1's face sheet printed on 7/8/25 showed diagnoses including but not limited to cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, aphasia (difficulty speaking), and cognitive communication deficit. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed moderate cognitive impairment. The facility was unable to prove any policy related to hair or beard cuts provided to residents. The facility did provide a staff in-service sign in sheet dated 7/1/25 related to: No one is allowed to provide a resident with a haircut. Only licensed barber or hairstylists are allowed to do this. The facility's Resident Rights policy states under the safety section: Your rights to safety .Your facility must provide services to keep your physical and mental health, at their highest practical levels.
Mar 2025 9 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with new diagnoses of mental illness after admiss...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with new diagnoses of mental illness after admission was referred to the state agency for a level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation for one of two residents (R7) reviewed for PASARR screening in the sample of 36. Findings include: The facility's Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASARR) Policy, dated 3/2024, documents, It is the policy to screen all potential admissions on an individualized basis. As part of the preadmission process, the facility participates in PASARR level I for all new and readmissions per requirements to determine if the individual meets the criterion for mental disorder (Severe Mental Illness/Severe Mental Disability), intellectual disability or related condition. Annually and with any significant change of status, the facility will complete the PASARR level one screen for those individuals identified per the Level II screen requiring specialized services. R7's admission Record, dated 3/25/25, documents, R7 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R7's most recent Level 1 PASARR evaluation, dated 1/23/2023, documents Diagnoses: Mental Health Diagnoses: No mental health diagnosis is known or suspected. This same Level 1 PASARR evaluation documents Review date: 1/23/23. PASARR Level 1 Determination: No Level II Required- No Suspected Mental Illness, Intellectual Disability, or Related Condition. R7's Current Medical Diagnoses list, dated 3/25/25, documents R7 has been diagnosed with the following diagnoses at or after admission: Major Depressive Disorder 3/17/23 and Psychotic Disorder with Hallucinations due to known Physiological Condition 1/26/23. R7's medical record does not document R7 had any further PASARR screening or evaluation since admission to the facility or after R7's new diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder and Psychotic Disorder with Hallucinations due to known Physiological Condition. On 3/25/25 at 11:20 AM V3/Social Service Director verified that R7 has not had a PASARR re-screen since admission or a level II screening. V3 stated, (R7) was actually on my list to submit for a new screening due to her new diagnoses after she admitted to the facility. I just did an audit and realized she does need a new PASARR screening done.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow a Physician's Wound Order for one of two residents (R47) reviewed for wound care in a sample of 36. Findings Include: T...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow a Physician's Wound Order for one of two residents (R47) reviewed for wound care in a sample of 36. Findings Include: The Facility's Pressure Injury and Skin Condition Assessment Policy, dated/revised 01/2018, documents, Physician ordered treatments shall be initialed by the staff on the electronic Treatment Administration Record after each administration. Other nursing measures not involving medications shall be documented in the weekly wound assessment or nurses noted. R47's Physician Order Sheet, dated 3/19/2025, documents Non-Pressure Wound of the Right Second toe. Dressing Treatment Plan, Primary Dressing: Betadine apply once daily for 23 days. Secondary Dressing: Gauze Island with border apply once daily for 23 days. On 3/25/2025 at 11:06 AM, V11 (RN/Registered Nurse) entered R47's room. V11 removed R47's right foot sock. A pea sized black, dry, and crusted area was noted to R47's right 2nd toe knuckle. V11 used 4x4 gauze saturated with normal saline and cleansed R47's wound. V11 then opened a package with a cotton swab saturated in Betadine and wiped R47's right toe wound. V11 then placed R47's right sock back on her foot without placing the physician ordered dressing. On 3/25/2025 at 11:30 AM, V11 confirmed she did not place any protective island dressing on R47's wound after the Betadine. V11 stated, I followed the wound order in R47's chart, I was not aware this was incorrect. On 3/25/2025 at 11:40 AM V13 (Licensed Practical Nurse/Infection Preventionist) stated, I am the one who reviews wound orders and enters them into resident's charts. I did not see the updated order, and the previous order was entered wrong. I missed this.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. R2's Face Sheet documents R2 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chro...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. R2's Face Sheet documents R2 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications, Sleep Apnea, Dysthymic Disorder, Diverticulum of Esophagus, Acquired, Pneumonitis due to Inhalation of Other Solids and Liquids. R2's Physicians Orders printed 3/24/25, documents Oxygen at three liters every night shift related to Other Specified Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Order date 2/17/25. Change humidifier bottle and nasal cannula weekly on Sunday night shift. Start date 2/9/2025. On 3/23/25 at 9:35 AM, R2 was sitting in her wheelchair with her head resting on the overbed table. R2's oxygen tubing was not labeled with the date or initials. On 3/23/25 at 10:50 AM, V8/Agency Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN verified R2's oxygen tubing were not labeled with the date or initials. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to date oxygen tubing and bag when not in use, place an oxygen sign on resident doors, and ensure a nebulizer facemask and tubing was changed weekly for four of five residents (R2, R6, R7, R11) reviewed for respiratory care in a sample of 36. Findings include: The facility's Oxygen and Respiratory Equipment-Changing/Cleaning Policy, dated 10/2024 documents Purpose: 1. To provide guidelines to employees for changing all disposable respiratory supplies. 2. To ensure the safety of residents by providing maintenance of all disposable respiratory supplies. 3. To minimize the risk of infection transmission. Procedure: 1. Handheld Nebulizer and Mask, if applicable: a. The handheld nebulizer should be changed weekly and as needed. b. A clean plastic bag with a zip lock or draw string, etc. (etcetera). should be changed weekly and as needed. 2. Nasal Cannula. a. Nasal cannulas are to be changed once a week and as needed. b. Whenever possible, residents using a portable oxygen tank, will be switched to a room oxygen concentrator while in their room. c. A clean plastic bag with a zip lock or draw string, etc. will be provided to store the cannula when it is not in use. It will be dated with the table the tubing was changed. 1. R6's Order Summary Report, dated 3/25/25, documents an order for Ipratropium Bromide Inhalation Solution 0.2% (percent) one vial as needed. On 3/23/25 at 10:00 AM R6 was sitting in her chair in her room. R6's nebulizer mask and tubing were lying on R6's bed undated and un-bagged. 2. R7's Order Summary Report, dated 3/25/25, documents an order for R7 to receive Oxygen at 3 liters via nasal route continuous every shift. On 3/23/25 at 12:15 PM R7's room had an oxygen concentrator with a nasal cannula tubing connected that was lying on R7's bed. The nasal cannula was un-dated and un-bagged. No oxygen sign was observed outside of R7's room. R7 was sitting in the hallway right outside of her room. R7 had on a nasal cannula hooked to a portable oxygen tank flowing with oxygen. R7's nasal cannula tubing was undated. 3. R11's Order Summary Report, dated 3/25/25, documents an order for R11 to receive Oxygen at 2 to 4 liters per nasal cannula to keep oxygen above 91% every shift. This same report documents an order for R11 to receive Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Nebulization Solution (2.5mg (milligrams)/3ml (milliliters) 0.083% one dose inhale orally via nebulizer four times a day. On 3/23/25 at 9:49 AM R11 was sitting in her wheelchair in her room eating breakfast with oxygen flowing via nasal cannula. R11's nasal cannula was undated. Behind R11's bed was a nebulizer machine with a nebulizer mask/tubing attached to the machine lying on the floor un-dated and unbagged. No oxygen sign was observed outside of R11's room. On 3/23/25 at 10:58 AM V8/Agency Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) verified R6's nebulizer tubing/mask was un-dated and un-bagged, R7's room had no oxygen sign outside of the door, R7's oxygen tubing was un-dated and un-bagged when not in use, R11's room had no oxygen sign outside of the door, R11's oxygen tubing was un-dated, and R11's nebulizer tubing/mask was un-dated and un-bagged. V8 stated, All respiratory equipment should be changed and dated every seven days and bagged in-between uses and anytime a resident is on oxygen an oxygen sign should be place outside of the residents room.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. R2's Face Sheet documents R2 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chro...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. R2's Face Sheet documents R2 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications, Sleep Apnea, Dysthymic Disorder, Diverticulum of Esophagus, Acquired, Pneumonitis due to Inhalation of Other Solids and Liquids. R2's Physicians Orders printed 3/25/25, documents an Enteral Feed Order to flush enteral tube every four hours with 150 milliliters of water. Order date 2/14/25. On 3/25/25 at 11:06 AM V11/RN entered R2's room, washed her hands and applied gloves. V11 did not wear a gown while flushing R2's feeding tube. 4. R17's current Care Plan, dated 3/14/25, documents, (R17) has an actual skin impairment of pressure to right heel and right plantar posterior foot. Enhanced barrier precautions related to chronic wounds. On 3/24/25 at 10:27 AM, R17 was sitting in her room sleeping in a chair. R17's room did not contain a sign to display R17 is in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). R17's room or doorway did not contain any containers of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) required for EBP precautions. On 3/25/25 at 10:05 AM, V12 (Registered Nurse) applied gloves and entered R17's room, then completed wound care to R17's right planter posterior foot. Throughout the wound treatment V12 did not wear a gown or any other PPE aside from gloves. 5. R51's current Care Plan, dated 3/11/25, documents a plan of care for Enhanced barrier precautions related to indwelling catheter. On 3/24/25 at 10:32 AM, R51 was sitting in his room, in bed. R51's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag was hooked to his wheelchair at R51's bedside. R51 stated he has been in the facility for about a month and has had a urinary catheter for the majority of his stay. At this time R51's room, door and entry way did not contain a sign or storage of PPE to alert that R51 is in EBP isolation. On 3/26/25 at 10:45 AM, V13 (Licensed Practical Nurse/ Infection Control Preventionist) stated, EBP should be implemented for anyone who has a hole that isn't natural. Such as wounds, urinary catheters, feeding tubes, central lines etcetera. Staff should wear gloves, mask, and gown for close contact resident care such as changing clothes, incontinence care, ADLs (activities of daily living), wound dressing changes, urinary catheter care etcetera. V13 confirmed R2, R10, R17, R47 and R51 should all be in EBP isolation with door entry signs and PPE outside of their rooms and stated she isn't sure why they don't have those precautions in place. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions were implemented for five of five residents (R2, R10, R17, R47, and R51) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 36. The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy, dated 3/2024, documents, Statement of Purpose: Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP): recommendations now include use of EBP for residents with chronic wounds or indwelling medical devices during high-contact resident care activities regardless of their multidrug-resistant organism status. Personnel: Personnel providing direct care. Personal Protective Equipment: Gown and gloves. Policy: EBP may be considered and implemented for: Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices (central line, feeding tube, tracheostomy, drains etc. (Etcetera). Infection or colonization with a novel or targeted multi-drug resistant organism when contact isolation does not apply. At discretion of the Infection Preventionist. Personal Protective Equipment. Standard Precautions must be followed with all cares. Additionally, gown and gloves must be worn when providing the following cares: Dressing, Bathing/Showering, Providing Hygiene, Changing Linens, Incontinence Care, Medical Device Care, and Wound Care. 1. R10's Order Summary Report, dated 3/26/25, documents the following order: Cleanse Deep Tissue Injury to buttocks with wound cleanser and pat dry. Apply (medicated honey gel) to wound bed and cover with dry dressing every day shift and as needed. On 3/25/25 at 9:45 AM V12/Registered Nurse performed wound care to R10's right buttock. R10's wound had a moderate amount of clear/pinkish drainage noted on the dressing and around the wound. V12 did not wear a gown during R10's wound care. 2. R47's current electronic medical record documents R47 has a scabbed wound on her right foot, second toe. On 03/25/2025 at 11:06 AM, V11 (RN/Registered Nurse) entered R47's room without a gown or gloves. R47's room did not contain a sign or personal protective equipment outside of R47's room for EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions). V11 completed a physician ordered wound treatment to R47's right foot, second toe wound. Throughout the wound care, V11 did not wear a gown.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide eight consecutive hours of a Registered Nurse, daily. This failure has the potential to affect all 49 residents residing in the fac...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide eight consecutive hours of a Registered Nurse, daily. This failure has the potential to affect all 49 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Facility Assessment Tool, dated 7/1/2024, documents the facility will provide a Registered Nurse (RN) as required with CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) minimum staffing requirements (eight consecutive hours per day). The facility's nursing staff schedule for March 2025, documents on 3/23/25 the facility did not have eight hours of an RN staffed in the facility. The facility's daily staff posting documents on 3/23/25, the facility was staffed with Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) and documents no Registered Nurses provided resident care throughout 24 hours. On 3/25/25 at 1:45 PM, V1 (Administrator) confirmed the daily staff postings provided for March 2025 are accurate. On 3/26/25 at 11:16 AM, V13 (LPN/ Infection Control Preventionist) confirmed that she has been doing some nursing assistant schedules and Director of Nursing duties for an interim time period. V13 confirmed the facility did not have RN coverage on Sunday, 3/23/25. V13 stated, If the daily staff sheet documents no RN was working, that is accurate. We have been short an RN every other weekend on several occasions. The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid form dated 3/23/25 and signed by V1 (Administrator), documents 49 residents currently reside within the facility.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prepared refrigerated foods were labeled and dated with an expiration date, opened foods were stored in covered contain...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prepared refrigerated foods were labeled and dated with an expiration date, opened foods were stored in covered containers to prevent contamination, the kitchen floor/dry storage room floor were kept clean and free of debris, and kitchen surfaces were kept free from dust and debris. These failures have the potential to affect all 49 residents in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Food and Supplies: Storage Policy, dated 1/2024, documents, Policy: Food and supply storage areas shall be maintained in a clean, safe and sanitary manner. Procedures: 1. Food services will maintain clean food storage areas. 4. Prepared foods stored in the refrigerator until service will be covered, labeled, and dated with an expiration date. 6. All foods will be covered, labeled, and dated. If there is no expiration date on the package or container, a use-by date must be written on the product. The facility's Dry Storage Policy, dated 3/2025, documents, Dry storage areas will be kept neat, orderly, and in a condition which protects foods in a safe and sanitary manner. Procedure: 6. Floors will be swept daily and mopped at least weekly. The facility's Kitchen Sanitation Manual Policy, dated 9/2023, documents, Policy: The kitchen will be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. The state and/or federal food code will be maintained on file within the food service department and will be the basis of all sanitation and food safety practices. 13. Sanitation is the entire departments responsibility. The facility's Cleaning and Sanitizing in Place Policy, undated, documents, Fixed equipment, utensils, and equipment too large to be cleaned in sink compartments will be washed manually or cleaned with a pressure spray method, rinsed, and then sanitized by spraying or swabbing with chemical sanitizer. Procedure: 1. Food service workers who use the equipment will be responsible for washing, rinsing, and preparation, food service areas, storage areas, and dish room. On 3/23/25 at 9:24 AM the kitchen was entered and toured with V6/Cook. In the walk in cooler there was a clear three liter container of green beans with a lid , pre made ham salad (according to V6) in a large metal container with a lid 1/2 full , two large cake pans of fruit crisp uncovered, a large metal pan 1/2 full of cooked cabbage with a lid, peeled potatoes in a square metal pan with a lid and a large metal pan 1/2 full of green gelatin with a lid. None of these items were labeled with an expiration date. V6 verified none of the prepared refrigerated items had a label with an expiration date and should have. V6 also verified the pans of fruit crisp were uncovered and anything prepared and stored in the refrigerator should be covered. In the dry storage room, the floor was covered in dirt and debris along with six cigarette butts scattered in the middle of the dry storage room floor. V6 verified the floors were covered with dirt and debris and cigarette butts were lying on the floor. V6 stated, I don't know why the floor is dirty like this, it should have been swept and mopped yesterday. The cigarette butts must be from a chair we take in and out from smoking. I didn't even notice them on the floor. The kitchen floor was observed to have dirt, debris, old food, and crumbs underneath the preparation tables. The four-burner stove had thick grease splatter built up on the stove and the inside of the left oven beneath the stove had black thick crusted matter built up inside of the stove. A shelf located above the kitchen stove was covered in dust and debris. The shelf underneath the steam table located in the kitchen had built up dust and debris where the pans were being stored. V6 verified the kitchen stove, the oven, the floors underneath the preparation table, the shelf above the stove, and the shelf underneath the steam table all needed cleaned. The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid form dated 3/23/25 and signed by V1 (Administrator), documents 49 residents currently reside within the facility.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0887 (Tag F0887)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer Covid-19 vaccinations and vaccination education to all employees. This failure has the potential to affect all 49 residents residing ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer Covid-19 vaccinations and vaccination education to all employees. This failure has the potential to affect all 49 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Interim Covid-19 Vaccination Guidelines - Residents and Employees policy, dated 10/2024, documents, To minimize the risk of residents acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from Covid-19. The facility maintains documentation related to staff Covid-19 vaccination that includes at minimum the following: That staff were provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with Covid-19 vaccine; Staff were offered the Covid-19 vaccine or information on obtaining the Covid-19 vaccine. On 3/26/25 at 10:40 AM V13 (Licensed Practical Nurse/ Infection Control Preventionist) stated she doesn't have documentation to show Covid-19 vaccinations are offered to all employees or to show they are given education related to the Covid-19 vaccination. V13 stated, Staff are told to go to the local pharmacy to get the Covid-19 vaccination if they want it. If we have extra Covid-19 vaccine after giving to the residents, we will offer those to staff but otherwise staff are not offered the Covid-19 vaccination in the facility. We don't ensure that staff get the Covid-19 vaccine offered here, they are expected to pay for it at the pharmacy if they choose to get it. The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid form, dated 3/23/25 and signed by V1 (Administrator), documents 49 residents currently reside within the facility.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0947 (Tag F0947)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) were provided and completed Dementia training in a 12 month period. This failure has the potentia...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) were provided and completed Dementia training in a 12 month period. This failure has the potential to affect all 49 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Facility Assessment tool, dated 7/1/24, documents the facility cares for residents with Cognitive loss/ Dementia. This policy also documents, Required in-service training for nurse aides. In-service training must: Be sufficient to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides but must be no less than 12 hours per year. Include dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training. On 3/25/25 at 11:45 AM, V1 (Administrator) provided a 12 month yearly training report for V18, V19 and V20 (Certified Nursing Assistants, CNA). These reports do not include documentation that V18, V19 or V20 have completed Dementia training from March 2024- March 2025. On 3/25/25 at 1:45 PM, V1 confirmed several residents in the facility have a diagnosis of Dementia and he does not have documentation to show that CNAs have been provided Dementia training. V1 stated I just started in January, and I wasn't aware of the lack of training but it appears none of the CNAs have had Dementia specific training in the past 12 months. The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid form dated 3/23/25 and signed by V1 (Administrator), documents 49 residents currently reside within the facility.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0847 (Tag F0847)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to explain the arbitration agreement to the resident, or their representative in a form or manner they could understand. This had the potentia...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to explain the arbitration agreement to the resident, or their representative in a form or manner they could understand. This had the potential to affect all 49 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 3/26/25 at 1:22 PM, V1/Administrator stated that there is not an Arbitration Agreement policy. The Arbitration Agreement (not dated) documents, Binding Arbitration is private, less costly, and less time-consuming than traditional litigation. The parties agree to submit their dispute to an impartial arbitrator authorized to resolve the controversy(s) by rendering a final and binding decision(s). Which can be enforced by the court. On 3/23/25 at 11:44 AM V3/Social Service Director stated, I have done the admissions since around September of 2024. The resident and Residents Power of Attorney are shown a video and given the contract where they can sign or not sign. I tell them if there are any concerns we encourage them to use arbitration instead of a lawyer. No one has declined to sign the arbitration. V3 was asked if she tells the resident/resident representative that they are giving up the right to sue the facility. V3 stated, No, those words have never come from my mouth. On 3/24/25 at 11:46 AM, V9, R16's Power of Attorney/POA stated, I don't know what an arbitration agreement is and do not know if I signed it. V9 was asked if she would have wanted to sign it if she knew she was giving up the right to sue the facility if there was an issue. V9 stated, I would not have signed the agreement; I am not one to sue but you never know what may happen. R16's Contract between Resident and Facility, dated 3/8/24, documents that V9 (R16's Power of Attorney) signed the binding arbitration agreement. The Resident Council Meeting was held on 3/25/25 at 10:15 AM. R1, R2, R7, R14, R37, and R41 attended the meeting. They were asked if they knew what an arbitration agreement was. All six residents stated that they did not know what arbitration meant and it was never explained to them. R1 stated that she had just admitted within the last 30 days and if it was signed R1 wants it changed. R1's Contract between Resident and Facility, dated 2/27/25 documents that R1 signed the binding arbitration agreement. On 3/25/25 at 11:06 AM, V10/Ombudsman stated, (R1) was so shocked and upset when she heard what the Arbitration Agreement meant (R1) was ready to call her family to make sure it got changed because (R1) is still within her 30-day time frame. The facility's Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services/CMS-671 Long Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid signed by V1 (Administrator) and dated 3/23/25 documents 49 residents currently reside in the facility.
Jan 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative services were being provided for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for restoratives and range of moti...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative services were being provided for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for restoratives and range of motion in a total sample of three. Findings include: The facility's Restorative Nursing Program policy revised on 01/2019 documents, Purpose: to promote each residents ability to maintain or regain the highest degree of independence as safely as possible. Includes, but is not limited to, programs in walking/mobility, dressing and grooming, eating and swallowing, transferring, bed mobility, communication, splint or brace assistance, amputation care and continence programs. Guidelines: Documentation of the interventions and the resident's response will be completed with each implementation. 1. R1's Restorative: Active ROM (Range of Motion) done every shift dated 1/13/25 look back on the last 14 days show the following dates documented as not done. 12/31/24-1/13/25 only done on two shifts instead of three. R1's Restorative: Dressing/grooming done every shift dated 1/13/25 look back on the last 14 days, the following dates not done. 1/3/25: morning, 1/4/25: night, 1/6/25: morning, 1/9/25: evening, and 1/13/25: morning. 2. R2's Restorative Bed Mobility done every shift dated 1/13/25 look back on the last 14 days, the following dates not done. 1/2/25: morning, 1/3/35: morning, 1/5/25: night, 1/6/25: morning, 1/8/25: morning, 1/12/25: morning, and 1/13/25: morning. R2's Restorative: Ambulation: R2 to ambulate with staff 2-3 times per day using with FWW and gait belt x (times) 1 assist with w/c (wheelchair) to follow. 100-200ft (feet), dated 1/13/25 look back on the last 14 days, the following dates not done. Dates 12/31/24-1/13/25 show less than 100-200 feet and not being done on several dates. 3. R3's Restorative: Dressing/grooming, dated 1/13/25 look back on the last 14 days, the following dates not done. 1/2/25: morning, 1/4/25: night, 1/6/25: morning, 1/12/25: morning, and 1/13/25: morning. On 1/13/25 at 9 A.M., V4 (CNA) stated, I do not ever have time to get restoratives done or walking residents. On 1/13/25 at 11:30 A.M., R2 was in her room, dressed, in her bed, and pleasant to talk with. R2 stated she does not receive therapy anymore and she does not walk with her wheeled walker ever with any CNA. R2 stated she only uses her wheelchair and does not walk. On 1/13/25 at 11:45 A.M., R1 was in her room, in her bed, dressed, oxygen via nasal cannula on. R1 stated she does not have any CNA staff come in and help her with moving her arms or legs or help getting dressed. On 1/13/25 at 12:10 P.M., R3 was in his room, in bed, and dressed. R3 has a urinary catheter and had foot pillows on his feet to protect his heels from pressure injury since he cannot get out of bed without the use of a mechanical lift. R3 stated he does not have any type of restorative program done daily with staff asking him to assist with dressing/grooming and that staff does it for him. On 1/13/25 at 2:15 P.M., V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) stated, I agree that restoratives are not being done, and that we need to work on it.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to care for dependent residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 60 residents residing ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to care for dependent residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 60 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The Facility Assessment Tool dated 08/2024-07/2025, documents, Indicate the number of residents you are licensed to provide care for: 65. Average Daily Census Analysis states the average residents are 60, the minimum is 55, and the maximum is 64. This same document states that staffing units per shift should have one Registered Nurse (RN), one Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), and six Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's) for days. Evenings, one RN, one LPN, and six CNA's. Nights, one LPN, and five CNA's. The facility's Resident List Report, dated 1/13/25, documents that 60 residents reside in the facility. The facility's Daily Staffing Sheet, dated 1/13/25, documents that for 1st shift the facility staffed one RN and one LPN and five CNAs. The same sheet documents that for 2nd shift the facility staffed two LPN's and five CNAs. On 1/13/25 at 9 A.M., V4 (CNA) stated, They are always short staffed and that she never has time to finish her required assignments. That on average she has 10-15 residents to care for all by herself. V4 stated that she does not ever have time to get restoratives done or walking residents. On 1/13/25 at 9:10 A.M., there were four CNAs on the floor observed doing various job tasks. There was a strong urine smell coming from one of the rooms. On 1/13/25 at 9:15 A.M., V5 (CNA) stated, Most of the time I do not get my required assignments done, and when I do it is tight. On average I have 11 residents to myself. On 1/13/25 at 9:30 A.M., V6 (RN/Registered Nurse) stated, Current staffing needs are getting better, the facility has started using agency about two weeks ago, but we are all human and there are still call offs from staff being sick, or on vacation, and we are never fully staffed. On 1/13/25 at 11:30 A.M., R2 stated she does not walk, and she does not have any staff come in and help her with walking or any range of motion activities. On 1/13/25 at 11:45 A.M., R1 stated she does not do any range of motion activities, or any walking. On 1/13/25 at 12:10 P.M., R3 stated he does not have anyone come in and help him move around or helps them assist him getting dress and that he cannot walk. On 1/13/25 at 12:20 P.M., V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) stated she knew of the urine smell coming from the room and that she would speak to staff about this. On 1/13/25 at 2:30 P.M., after walking by the room, there was only a faint smell of urine indicating that staff had cleaned the room. On 1/13/25 at 1:45 P.M., V3 (Infection Presentationist/CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) Scheduler) stated, We schedule based on the census, I was told if it is 62 or under to go 5 or over 62 to schedule 6. V3 stated that she took over her position in the beginning of January. V3 stated that yes, on 1/13/25 on day shift there were only 5 CNA's and on evening shift only 5 CNA's. V3 stated she did not know she was supposed to staff based on facility assessment. On 1/13/25 at 2:30 P.M., V7 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated that the 1/13/2025 Daily Staffing Sheet was accurate, there were five CNAs, and two LPNs on staff working the unit halls and caring for the residents.
Nov 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Staffing Information (Tag F0732)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post the facility Daily Staffing Report daily and, in an area, visible to all residents and visitors. This failure has the pot...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post the facility Daily Staffing Report daily and, in an area, visible to all residents and visitors. This failure has the potential to affect all 58 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Midnight Census report, dated 11/6/24, documents there are currently 58 residents residing in the facility. On 11/6/24 at 8:35 am, the facility's Nurse Staffing posting was located near the Receptionist desk, on the wall, behind a portable stand that held instructions for visitors to sign in on the facility's visitor log. This posting is not easily visible to staff, residents, or visitors. This Nurse Staffing posting was last completed on 10/29/24. On 11/8/24 at 10:20 am, 10:22 am, 10:24 am, and 10:25 am, R2, R9, R10, and R12 respectively stated they do not know where the Nursing Staff posting is located. On 11/6/24 at 9:12 am, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) walked with this writer to the Receptionist desk and confirmed the location of the Nurse Staffing posting on the wall behind a portable stand and confirmed it had not been completed since 10/29/24 and should have been. V2 DON stated V13 CNA Scheduler usually fills it out. V2 DON did not move the portable sign to enable visibility of the staff posting. On 11/7/24 at 3:20 pm, V1 Interim Administrator accompanied writer to the Receptionist desk and confirmed the Nurse Staff posting is not easily visible to residents, visitors, or staff due to being on the wall behind a portable sign and stated should be completed or updated daily.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Staffing Data (Tag F0851)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately report the PBJ (pay-roll based journal) staffing information. This failure affects all 58 residing in the facility....

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately report the PBJ (pay-roll based journal) staffing information. This failure affects all 58 residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's PBJ (pay-roll based journal) Staffing Data Report, fiscal year Quarter 3 2024, dated April 1 through June 30, 2024, documents Excessively Low Weekend Staffing was triggered due to facility submission of excessively low staffing worked on the weekends. The facility's Midnight Census report, dated 11/6/24, documents there are currently 58 residents residing in the facility. On 11/6/24 and 11/7/24 at 7:30 am through 4:00 pm, there were six CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants), two RNs (Registered Nurses) and one LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) working on the day shift. On 11/6/24 at 11:05 am and 11:21 am, and on 11/7/24 at 7:45 am and 9:40 am R2, R10, R6 and R9 respectively stated the facility has two to three CNAs and a Nurse for each hallway in the facility and their needs are being met. On 11/8/24 at 8:30 am, R12 stated she is the President of Resident Council, and no one has complained about the staff or the staffing during the meetings. On 11/6/24 at 8:05 am, 8:16 am, 8:30 am, and 11:05 am, V10, V11, V12, V13 and V17 CNAs respectively stated the facility is staffed with six CNAs on the day and evening shifts and four on the midnight shift. V10 through V13 and V17 CNAs stated they feel there is enough staff and can complete their work assignments daily and Nurses help when needed. On 11/6/24 at 11:00 am, V6 RN and V8 LPN respectively stated there are three Nurses and five to six CNAs on the day shift, two Nurses and six CNAs on evening shift, and one Nurse and four CNAs on the midnight shift. V6 RN and V8 LPN stated the staff can get their work done daily and that everyone helps when needed. On 11/7/24 at 9:10 am, and 9:30 am, V4 SSD and V5 Activity Director respectively stated the facility has adequate staffing and they assist when needed. On 11/7/24 at 3:15 pm, V1 Interim Administrator stated the facility census is at 58 and normally stays consistent between 55 to 60. The staffing is based on the facility census and acuity of care. The staffing hours are submitted to the RDO (Regional Director of Operations), RDO uses a calculator, and we adjust the staffing accordingly. On 11/7/24 at 3:00 pm, V3 VP (Vice President) of Clinical Operations and V1 Interim Administrator provided staff timecard reports for April through June 2024 and stated the facility reports show there was adequate staffing on the weekends during the third quarter. V3 VP of Clinical Operations stated she did some investigating regarding the facility's PBJ staffing numbers, compared the staff timecard reports to the daily schedules, and can only concluded she believes V24 Former Administrator did not report the use of the Agency Nurses and CNAs during that quarter. V3 also stated the management staff are salary, but when they cover a shift or work other than their job, they are to punch the time clock which would post their hours for the PBJ reporting and the management staff have not been doing this, so their hours worked are not being counted. On 11/8/24 at 11:00 am, V3 VP of Clinical Operations provided facility timecard reports and Agency staff hours worked for the weekends of 10/12/24, 10/13/24, 10/19/24, and 10/20/24 and stated V24 Former Administrator was not including the Agency Nurses and CNAs in the total hours when submitting the hours for the PBJ staffing information. V3 VP of Clinical Operations reviewed hours with this writer and stated the facility had greater totals of staff than what was reported. V3 stated the staffing hours will be reported correctly from here on out and the next quarter will reflect accurate information for the facility's PBJ report.
Sept 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0602 (Tag F0602)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents from misappropriation of resident property for nine residents (R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14 and R15) of nine resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents from misappropriation of resident property for nine residents (R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14 and R15) of nine residents reviewed for missing medications, in a sample of 15. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The facility policy, Abuse Prevention and Reporting, dated (reviewed) 08/2023 directs staff, This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. Misappropriation of resident property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation or wrongful temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. The facility Preliminary 24-Hour Abuse Investigation Report dated 8/30/24 documents, We (facility) have received all allegation (of) Theft. On 8/29/24 (the facility) made aware of alleged misappropriation of resident property. Investigation initiated. Staff member identified (V6/RN) and suspended pending investigation. Follow up report will be sent. The (facility) Count of Missing Medication form, provided by V9/Regional Director of Operations documents, R11 (Pharmacy) dispensed 60 Norco 5/325 MG tablets on 8/26/24- missing: R14 (Pharmacy) dispensed 60 Norco 5/325 MG tablets on 8/19/24- missing and R14 (Pharmacy) dispensed 60 Norco 5/325 MG tablets on 8/1/24- missing and R14 (Pharmacy) dispensed 30 Norco 5/325 MG tablets on 7/18/24- missing; R15 (Pharmacy) dispensed 60 Norco 5/325 MG tablets on 7/30/24- missing and R15 (Pharmacy) dispensed 60 Norco 5/325 MG tablets on 8/9/24- missing; R13 (Pharmacy) dispensed 60 Norco 5/325 MG tablets on 7/6/24- missing and R13 (Pharmacy) dispensed 60 Norco 5/325 MG tablets- missing; R12 (Pharmacy) dispensed 60 Norco 5/325 MG tablets on 7/22/24- missing and (Pharmacy) dispensed 58 Norco 5/325 MG tablets on 8/26/24- missing; R10 (Pharmacy) dispensed 120 Norco 5/325 MG tablets- missing; R9 (Pharmacy) dispensed 90 Oxycontin 5/325 MG tablets on 8/15/24- missing; R7 (Pharmacy) dispensed 60 Tramadol 50 MG tablets on 7/22/24- missing; R8 (Pharmacy) dispensed 120 Norco 5/325 MG tablets on 8/13/24- missing. The facility Final Abuse Investigation Report, Original Allegation: Misappropriation of Property, dated Initial Report: 8/30/24, Final Report: 9/5/24 documents, Facts Determined: On 8/29/24 at approximately 12 (12:00) P.M., (facility) made aware of alleged misappropriation of medication occurring by alleged perpetrator (V6/Former Employee Registered Nurse) at facilities (V6) had been contracted at as agency staff. Resident's (R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14 and R15) Medical Doctor, local police department and Ombudsman were notified of the allegation. Alleged perpetrator (V6) identified and suspended pending investigation. All residents with pain medication assessed, no change in pain status noted. Both residents and staff interviews were initiated. Conclusion and Action Taken: IDT (Intra Disciplinary Team) met to discuss the investigation and completed education with clinical staffing regarding Narcotics. Audit conducted revealing cards of medication that could not be accounted for. Residents that were affected were reimbursed by facility. Education ongoing with all clinical nursing staff regarding Narcotic Logs. The facility will continue to audit logs for Narcotic compliance. Concerns with alleged perpetrator (V6) shared with (State) Professional Regulation (Department). On 9/12/24 at 11:50 A.M., V1/Administrator stated, We hired (V6/Former employee Registered Nurse) on 7/31/24. (V6) had worked here through the Agency a couple of times in July (2024) and was a good nurse. The last day (V6) worked was 8/27/24. On 8/29/24 an officer from the State Attorney General's office came in and reported to us that (V6) was under investigation at multiple nursing homes where (V6) was working through Agency, for narcotic diversion. At that time, we were not aware of any diversion going on in our building. We ended up terminating (V6) due to (V6) not participating in the investigation. We did our own investigation and discovered we had many missing narcotics. On 9/13/24 at 9:50 A.M., V9/Regional Director of Operations stated, I was the one responsible for conducting the investigation onto the missing narcotics for this facility. I went back from June (2024) through August (2024). I discovered that during the days that (V6) worked, (V6) was able to misappropriate full (medication) cards of narcotics when our local pharmacy made their delivery, by not following our policy. During my investigation, it was determined that there were 898 missing narcotic pills, from nine different facility residents (R7-R15).
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep medications secure for nine residents (R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14 and R15) of nine residents reviewed for medication storage,...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep medications secure for nine residents (R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14 and R15) of nine residents reviewed for medication storage, in a sample of 15. The facility policy, Narcotic/Controlled Substances- Counting, dated (reviewed) 11/2023 directs staff, To count controlled substances with a partner and to verify the accuracy of the log sheets. General Guidelines: Always participate in the counting of the controlled substances at the beginning and ending of your shift. If you do not observe the medication that you sign as being present, you may be implicated if the medications are later missing. Follow your facilities specific guidelines and use their specific log sheet. The facility form, Shift Change Controlled Substance Inventory Count Sheet directs staff, Nurse coming on to shift must verify count of all controlled substances with nurse coming off shift or any time the medication cart keys are exchanged. Nurses must count total (number) of cards/containers and total (number) count sheets, both for individual residents and applicable contingency supplies with controlled drugs. Nurses must verify actual drug counts (number of tablets, capsules, patches, vials, etc.) against each individual resident count sheet. Any discrepancies must be reported immediately to director of nursing or nursing supervisor. Every controlled substance medication and count sheet added or removed from the medication cart MUST be documented below. This same form contains an area that directs staff, Ending balance of cards/containers from previous shift __, Ending balance of Count Sheets from previous shift __. Verified by Nurse 1 and Nurse 2. R7's July 2024 Physician Order Sheet includes the following diagnoses: Peripheral Vascular Disease, Pain. Also included are the following medication orders: Tramadol 50 MG (Milligrams) Give 50 MG by mouth every 12 hours for pain. R8's July 2024 Physician Order Sheet includes the following diagnoses: Pain in Left Shoulder and Primary Osteoarthritis in Knee. Also included are the following medication orders: Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 10/325 MG Give one tablet by mouth every 12 hours for left shoulder pain and Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 10/325 MG Give one tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. R9's Physician Order Sheet, dated August 2024 includes the following diagnoses: Aftercare Following Joint Replacement Surgery, Primary Osteoarthritis of Right Knee, Presence of Right Artificial Joint, Presence of Left Artificial Hip Joint and Intervertebral Disc Degeneration of Lumber Region. Also included are the following medication orders: Oxycodone 5/325 MG Give one tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. R10's August 2024 Physician Order Sheet includes the following diagnoses: Radiculopathy, Pain in Right Knee, Internal Derangement of Knee, Osteoarthritis of Knee and Encounter for Orthopedic Aftercare. Also included are the following medication orders: Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5/325 MG Give one tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for severe pain; Tramadol 50 MG Give one tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for severe pain. R11's August 2024 Physician Order Sheet includes the following diagnosis: Surgical Aftercare Following Surgery on the Nervous System. Also included are the following medication orders: Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5/325 MG Give one tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for severe pain. R12's July 2024 Physician Order Sheet includes the following diagnoses: Paraplegia, Sciatica and Multiple Sclerosis. Also included are the following medication orders: Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5/325 MG Give one tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for back pain and Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5/325 MG Give two tablets by mouth every 6 hours as needed for back pain related to sciatica. R13's July 2024 Physician Order Sheet includes the following diagnoses: Polyosteoarthritis, S/P Fracture of Left Femur and Low Back Pain. Also included are the following medication orders: Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5/325 MG Give one tablet by mouth at bedtime for back pain; Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5/325 MG Give one tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain and Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5/325 MG Give one tablet by mouth in the morning for severe right knee pain. R14's July 2024 Physician Order Sheet includes the following diagnoses: Fibromyalgia, Osteoarthritis, Polyneuropathy, Low Back Pain, Lumbago with Sciatica on Left Side, Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Spinal Stenosis Lumbosacral Region. Also included are the following medication orders: Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5/325 MG Give one tablet every 6 hours as needed for pain; Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5/325 MG Give one tablet by mouth two times a day for pain. R15's July 2024 Physician Order Sheet includes the following diagnosis: Pain. Also included are the following medication orders: Morphine Sulfate Oral Solution 20 MG/ML (Milliliter) Give 10 MG by mouth every one hour as needed for pain or shortness of breath; Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5/325 MG Give one tablet by mouth three times a day for pain; Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5/325 MG Give one tablet every 6 hours as needed for pain. The (facility) Count of Missing Medication form, provided by V9/Regional Director of Operations documents, R11 (Pharmacy) dispensed 60 Norco 5/325 MG tablets on 8/26/24- missing: R14 (Pharmacy) dispensed 60 Norco 5/325 MG tablets on 8/19/24- missing and R14 (Pharmacy) dispensed 60 Norco 5/325 MG tablets on 8/1/24- missing and R14 (Pharmacy) dispensed 30 Norco 5/325 MG tablets on 7/18/24- missing; R15 (Pharmacy) dispensed 60 Norco 5/325 MG tablets on 7/30/24- missing and R15 (Pharmacy) dispensed 60 Norco 5/325 MG tablets on 8/9/24- missing; R13 (Pharmacy) dispensed 60 Norco 5/325 MG tablets on 7/6/24- missing and R13 (Pharmacy) dispensed 60 Norco 5/325 MG tablets- missing; R12 (Pharmacy) dispensed 60 Norco 5/325 MG tablets on 7/22/24- missing and (Pharmacy) dispensed 58 Norco 5/325 MG tablets on 8/26/24- missing; R10 (Pharmacy) dispensed 120 Norco 5/325 MG tablets- missing; R9 (Pharmacy) dispensed 90 Oxycontin 5/325 MG tablets on 8/15/24- missing; R7 (Pharmacy) dispensed 60 Tramadol 50 MG tablets on 7/22/24- missing; R8 (Pharmacy) dispensed 120 Norco 5/325 MG tablets on 8/13/24- missing. On 9/13/24 at 9:50 A.M., V9/Regional Director of Operations stated, I was the one responsible for conducting the investigation onto the missing narcotics for this facility. I went back from June (2024) through August (2024). I discovered that during the days that (V6) worked, (V6) was able to misappropriate full (medication) cards of narcotics when our local pharmacy made their delivery, by not following our policy. During my investigation, it was determined that there were 898 missing narcotic pills, from nine different facility residents (R7-R15).
Jul 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a staff member treated a resident with respect for one of six...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a staff member treated a resident with respect for one of six residents (R1) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of five. Findings include: The facility's Resident Rights policy dated 02/2024 documents, Purpose: To promote the exercise of rights for each resident, including any who face barriers in the exercise of these rights. Exercising rights means that residents have autonomy and choice, to the maximum extent possible, about how they wish to live their everyday lives and receive care, subject to the facility's rules, as long as those rules do not violate a regulatory requirement. The facility's Concern/Compliment Form dated 7-1-24 documents, Nature of complaint: (R1) concerned that night shift CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant (V28) was acting weird. Correction action taken: Education to employee (V28) on resident rights and customer service. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] documents R1 is cognitively intact. On 7-26-24 at 9:40 AM R1 stated, One night the beginning of July (2024) my roommate put on his light. (V28) came into help my roommate and I asked (V28) to help me with my urinal. (V28) used the remote to my bed to elevate the head of my bed. My remote works backwards, so when (V28) pushed up the bed went down. I told (V28) the remote has always worked backwards and to leave the remote alone. (V28) got under my bed and messed with the cords anyway. When (V28) messed with the cords it blew a breaker in my room and my air mattress went flat. I said to (V28) 'Now I am really in a pickle.' (V28) got in my face, raised her voice, and said to me, Get your big boy pants on. I am not stupid. I said to (V28), no you are not stupid, but you are really annoying and should have left my remote alone like I told you to. (V28) was acting really weird. I feel like (V28) was not respectful and needed to learn customer service. On 7-26-24 at 11:00 AM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, (V28) was given education about resident rights and treating (R1) with dignity and respect. On 7-26-24 at 12:30 PM V28 stated, I did try to fix (R1's) remote even though (R1) did not want me to fix it. I do not remember all that was said that night between me and (R1). I talk loud because of my hearing.
Jul 2024 1 deficiency 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to a resident identified as an elopement risk, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to a resident identified as an elopement risk, who had been exhibiting an increase in verbalizations of exit seeking behavior. On the morning of 05/18/24, R1 removed his (elopement alert bracelet) and exited the facility unnoticed. R1 was later found propelling his wheelchair approaching a road containing a high volume of traffic. R1 was one of three residents reviewed for wandering/elopement in the sample of three. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. While the immediacy was removed on 07/10/2024, the facility remains out of compliance at a Severity Level two as additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the removal plan including their In-service training and Quality Assessment oversight. Findings include: The facility's 'Code Pink- Missing Resident/Elopement' policy (revised 04/2023) documents, The facility maintains a process to assess all residents for risk for elopement, implement risk reduction strategies for those identified as an elopement risk, and institute measure for resident identification at the time of admission. Elopement is the ability of a cognitively impaired resident who is not capable of protecting himself or herself from harm, to successfully leave the facility unsupervised and unnoticed and who may enter into harm's way. This same policy documents, Risk Reductions Measures: Interventions that may be used for residents identified as high risk for elopement include: Frequent monitoring of the resident's whereabouts to assure he or she remains in the facility; room placement close to common areas such as the nurse's station and away from exits; promoting activities that are in full view of staff members; Alternative activities to maintain the interest level of the wanderer; Implementation of wander bracelet or other electronic alert systems, transfer to a more suitable or more secured unit/facility, if needed. This policy also documents, Verification of control systems: If an electronic surveillance system is in place, door alarms are tested weekly for proper functioning and the testing is documented; Door alarm codes are changed routinely; Resident electronic monitoring sensors are checked every shift for placement and daily for proper functioning and documented in the Resident Record, Treatment Administration Record, Medication Administration Record, or a specifically designed log. R1's Medical Record documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Urinary Tract Infection, Major Depressive Disorder, Vascular Dementia, and Delusional Disorder. R1's Elopement Risk Assessment (dated 05/13/24) documents a score of 8, indicating R1 is, at risk to elope and should be placed on the Elopement Risk Protocol. A care plan for elopement is indicated. R1's Elopement Risk/Wanderer care plan (dated 05/13/24) documents R1 is at risk for elopement and documents the following interventions: 1:1 monitoring. IDT (interdisciplinary team) to discuss and re-evaluate; Assess for fall risk; Distract resident from wandering by offering pleasant diversions, structured activities, food, conversation, television, book; Identify pattern of wandering- Is wandering purposeful? Does it indicate the need for more exercise? Intervene as appropriate; Provide 1:1 supervision with staff; Provide structured activities- toileting, walking inside and outside, reorientation strategies including signs, pictures and memory boxes. R1's Physician Order (dated 05/21/24) documents the following order: Ensure (elopement alert bracelet) is attached to right ankle every shift and night shift to test function. R1's Treatment Administration Record (dated May 2024) documents R1's elopement alert bracelet was not checked on the day shift of 05/18/24 and was last checked at some point during night shift on 05/17/24. R1's Progress Note (dated 05/13/24) documents: (R1) was assessed for elopement/unauthorized leave. The resident does not have a history of wandering/elopement and does not verbalize a strong desire to leave. The resident has a diagnosis of dementia and/or severe mental illness. Resident has reported or documented episodes of elopement and/or attempts to elope. The resident's representative (i.e., Health Care Power of Attorney, close family member, guardian) has requested that the resident be monitored on the Elopement Protocol. Behavioral Observations include: Verbalizes a serious/strong intent to leave the facility in the absence of an appropriate discharge plan. Responds poorly to staff re-direction when roaming into areas that are off limits or unauthorized. Has the physical ability to leave the building. Becomes agitated, confused and/or disoriented or displays consistently poor judgement (would not be able to safely care for him/herself outside of the facility). Resident is at risk to elope and should be placed on the Elopement Risk Protocol. A care plan for Elopement is indicated. On 07/03/24 at 10:30 AM, V11 (Social Service Director) stated R1's cognition would fluctuate from day to day, He could always answer the questions from the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment correctly and would score 15 (indicating cognitively intact), but there were several instances when he could not recall a conversation I had with him the previous day. I had multiple conversations with him about why he had a court-appointed guardian. He would then ask me the same thing the following day and could not recall the same conversation we'd had about it from the day before. R1's Progress Note (dated 05/18/24), written by V1 (Administrator), documents, Resident (R1) noted to have exited facility, no alarm sounded. Staff approached resident and attempted to redirect back to the facility; these attempts were unsuccessful. 911 called and (R1) resisted and was aggressive towards emergency personnel before being sent to (local hospital) for evaluation. No injury noted. Guardian and physician notified. On 07/02/24 at 01:35 PM, V3 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated the following regarding R1's 05/18/24 elopement, I know it was on a weekend sometime in May. I was told he made it a couple of blocks. He was close to Route 24, which is a pretty busy road. He would say that he was going to leave daily. I heard he cut his (elopement alert bracelet) off and then left. I don't think the alarm sounded since he wasn't wearing his (elopement alert bracelet). He was pretty well in his right mind most of the time. The code to exit the building used to be posted next to the keypad in the breezeway near the front door, so he probably just entered the code to get out. I know they had to change codes to some of the other doors because he knew the code to unlock and open them. When (R1) got out of the building, he was in his wheelchair, and I believe someone in a car spotted him and notified the facility. I believe (V4, Certified Nursing Assistant) and (V5, Registered Nurse) left the building to find him. On 07/02/24 at 02:00 PM, V6 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated, (R1) got out of the building on 05/18/24. He kept saying to that he was going to leave. I know he told (V7, Certified Nursing Assistant) that he was leaving on that same morning before he eloped. From what I have been told, (R1) got out alone and nearly made it to Route 24, and that is a very busy road. I am not sure how he was found. On 07/02/24 at 02:10 PM, V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated she was working on 05/18/24 when R1 eloped from the facility. V4 stated, We were getting ready to serve breakfast, and I got a message from (V8, Certified Nursing Assistant) on our work communication messaging app. The message said, '(V5, Registered Nurse) and I (V8) are on (Route) 24 with (R1).' I tried calling (V5 and V8) and got no answer from either one of them. A few minutes later, I told the other staff in the building I was going to go find them. I got in my van and headed toward (Route) 24. I didn't see them, so I sent a text to (V8) for their location, and she responded that they were up by (Route) 24 on the side road towards (nearby town). When I found them, (R1) was very agitated, and shortly after I got there, the police showed up followed by an ambulance. V4 then stated, (R1) must have gotten out the front door. He was in his wheelchair and made it down to the corner, turned left and headed toward Route 24. I believe some lady driving saw him and notified the facility. On 07/02/24 at 02:30 PM, V8 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated she was one of two staff members that were first to locate R1 on 05/18/24 after he had eloped from the facility. V8 stated, It was about 08:00 AM and we were serving breakfast. I was up front in the lobby. (R1) likes to sit up front near the entrance to the building in the living room. I was talking to (V5, Registered Nurse), and a lady came in the front door. She told us she was driving and saw a man in a wheelchair on the road. She said that she had stopped to check on the man and he told her he was going home, so she decided to drive here and come inside to alert someone. (V5) and I got in her car and found (R1) propelling his wheelchair a couple blocks away. He had almost made it up to Route 24. He was actually very close, and that road is very busy with traffic. He was in his wheelchair, and he was very agitated because we had found him. We called (V1, Administrator) and (V2, Director of Nursing), and they talked to (R1) and basically explained his options. He remained agitated, so (V5) called 911. Two police officers showed up and then an ambulance. (R1) was sent to the emergency room and they (medics) had to sedate him to get him into the ambulance. (R1) somehow got his (Elopement alert bracelet) off. I heard he cut it off, and then he entered the code to exit the building since it used to be posted on the wall next to the keypad by the front door. It has since been changed. (R1) is alert enough to know how to enter the code to unlock the door. At some point, I had messaged (V4, Certified Nursing Assistant) to let her know where (V5) and I were because we had been out of the building for at least 30 minutes, and I knew people were going to start wondering where (V5) and I were at. (V4) came to where we were in the road in her van, and we loaded (R1's) wheelchair in her van when (R1) was taken to the hospital. V8 stated she was never asked to give a witness statement about the incident, No one ever talked to me about it, and I thought that was a little weird. On 07/03/24 at 09:35 AM, V5 (Registered Nurse/Former Manager on Duty) stated she is one of the staff members that responded after R1 eloped from the facility on 05/18/24. V5 stated, I remember I was on the phone with a resident's family member about lab results. A lady from the community came in the building and told (V8, Certified Nursing Assistant) that there was a man in a wheelchair going down the road. (V8) and I got in my car and located (R1). He was agitated that we had found him, and he was dead set that he was going home. I called (V1, Administrator) and (V2, Director of Nursing). Both tried talking to (R1) and he still refused to return, so 911 was called. The police arrived and then the medics. (R1) was combative with them and had to be sedated before they transported him to the hospital. While we were standing in the road, I noticed he did not have his (elopement alert bracelet) on his wheelchair. I asked him where it was, and he would not tell me. When he returned from the hospital a couple days later, he told me he had found a pair of scissors in the receptionist's desk drawer, cut the bracelet off, and threw it in a drawer with the scissors. I went and checked the drawers in the front living room, and there sat a pair of scissors and a cut (elopement alert) bracelet. (R1) had made it very close to Route 24. If that lady wouldn't have come when she did, it could have turned really ugly. I believe (R1) would have attempted to cross that road, and it's a road that is very, very busy with traffic. V5 stated she was never asked to give a witness statement or provide any details of the incident after it had occurred. V5 stated R1 was alert and oriented most of the time, but did exhibit some confusion about going home, He did not understand why he had a court-appointed guardian, and this had been explained to him often. At times, (R1) would get into a state of mind where he was not making safe, rational decisions. Before he got out of the building, he kept talking about leaving. He knew the code to exit the dining room door that led to the courtyard, and since he was not allowed outside by himself after the incident, the code to exit the dining room door was changed. The code to the front door used to be posted right next to the keypad where you enter the code to unlock it. I am sure this is how (R1) got out, the code was posted so all he had to do was type it in on the keypad. That code had to be changed after all of this occurred. On 07/03/24 at 10:55 AM, V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated she was working on 05/18/24 when R1 eloped. V7 stated, I talked to him early that morning when he was in his room. I asked him how he was doing, and he said 'OK.' He told me not to worry about his stuff because it's all packed up, and I saw that all of his personal items were packed in a black garbage bag. He then told me that he was going to leave that day. He said, 'right after breakfast I'm going to head out those doors.' I told (V12, local agency Licensed Practical Nurse), who was working in the East Hall that day. I never saw (V12) go and start checking on (R1) frequently after I had reported all of this to her. She really didn't do anything after I told her. On 07/03/24 at 03:00 PM, V12 (local agency Licensed Practical Nurse) stated she recalls the day when R1 eloped from the facility, I had never worked with that resident (R1) before. I was told he had been saying he was going to leave and go home. One of the CNAs (V7) told me that he told her he was leaving after breakfast and that he had all of his bags packed in a garbage bag. I saw him when he was heading to the dining room. I went ahead and gave him his medications, and that was the last time that I saw him. The manager on duty (V5, Registered Nurse) was aware of what he was saying and told me she had spoken with (R1), so I continued on with my medication pass. V12 stated, I haven't worked at that facility much, but I do remember the code to unlock the door is posted right by the keypad in the entryway. On 07/03/24 at 08:15 AM, V1 (Administrator) confirmed R1 eloped from the facility on 05/18/24 and stated, It happened on the weekend. The alarm didn't give warning and (R1) went through the door. I believe he was about half a block away. When staff found him, he was very noncompliant and wasn't rationalizing with anyone. 911 was called and (R1) was sent to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation. He was placed on 1:1 supervision when he returned to the facility. I believe someone from the community alerted staff in the building that a man was propelling his wheelchair down the road. V1 stated an incident investigation was not completed after R1's elopement, and therefore, he cannot provide an investigation for review. On 07/03/24 at 12:55 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that R1 eloped on a day during the weekend, and she was not at the facility when it occurred. V2 stated, I got a call from (V5, Registered Nurse) and she told me that she was outside of the building with (R1). I could hear (R1) in the background saying he wanted to go home. He lived in (nearby town), which is at least a 30-minute drive from the facility. I asked him to return to the facility with (V5) and told him that if he was not willing to return, EMS (emergency medical services) would be contacted to handle the situation. 911 was then called and R1 was taken to the hospital. I did find out later that he told (V5) that he cut his (elopement alert bracelet). V2 stated there was no type of investigation completed on R1's 05/18/24 elopement incident because, he wasn't harmed from what I understand from the regulations. V2 stated, (R1) has some periods of confusion. He couldn't understand why he couldn't just leave the building and wheel himself back to his hometown. There were multiple conversations that had to be repeated because he couldn't recall the same conversation that occurred the day before. He lacked safety awareness. On 07/08/24 at 08:50 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated an intervention should have been implemented on 05/18/24 when R1 was making statements of leaving the building. V2 stated, If he had his bags packs and he was verbalizing a plan, I would expect staff to put him on 1:1 supervision. On 07/08/24 at 09:00 AM, V5 (Registered Nurse/Former Manager on Duty) stated, I was the Manager on Duty when (R1) eloped. I remember seeing (R1) in the dining room. I believe one of the CNAs (V7) reported to the nurse (V12) who then came to speak with me. I do recall speaking with (V12) about (R1). He was out in a common area, so he was never put on 1:1 supervision. The Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 07/09/24 at 10:20 AM to have begun on 05/18/24 when R1 verbalized he was going to leave the facility and no additional supervision was provided. V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 07/09/24 at 10:28 AM. The surveyor confirmed through interview, observation and record review that the facility took the following actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy: On 07/10/24, V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing) were interviewed and spoke in detail about the facility's abatement plan. On 07/10/24, R1's most current medical record was reviewed and documents the following was completed upon R1's return from (local hospital) on 05/21/24: R1 was assessed by nursing and no pain or skin issues were identified; R1 was reassessed for risk of elopement and community survival skills; R1 was placed on 1:1 supervision that later decreased to 15 minute checks which was documented on 24 Hour/15 Minute Monitoring logs. This documentation was reviewed weekly by V2 (Director on Nursing) until R1 was discharged from the facility. On 07/03/21, V1 (Administrator) stated that an individual from maintenance came to the facility on [DATE] to check the door alarm's functional status and the front door alarm code was changed at that time. V1 stated that the keypad code posting was taken down and would no longer be posted in the front breezeway near the keypad that unlocks the front door. V1 then provided copies of forms titled 'Daily Maintenance Tasks' (dated 05/13/24 - 07/07/24), which indicate that maintenance staff have checked the functionality of the exit door and elopement alert bracelet alarm system daily during this time frame. On 07/10/24, V1 provided documentation indicating that V11 (Social Service Director) reviewed all facility resident's most current Elopement Risk Assessments for accuracy, and on 07/09/24, V11 completed a new Elopement Risk Assessment on every resident in the facility. V1 also stated that all residents will be evaluated for elopement risk at admission, readmission, quarterly, annually, with a significant change, and incidentally if risk behaviors are identified. V1 stated V11 is responsible for conducting these assessments, and a six-week audit is being conducted by V1. V1 provided copies of the Weekly Audit forms (dated 05/24/23 - 07/05/23) that have been completed. On 07/10/23, V1 provided copies of Elopement Drill/Post-Elopement Checklist logs that were completed on 05/18/24 and 07/03/24. On 07/10/23 at 10:00 AM, V1 stated that nursing staff check residents with elopement alert bracelets each shift to ensure the bracelet is in place. V1 stated elopement alert bracelets are also checked for functionality daily by nursing and maintenance, and facility staff as well as agency staff have binders to access at the nurse's station. On 07/10/24 at 12:40 PM, a binder labeled Agency Staff Orientation was accessible at the nurse's station and contained the facility's Elopement Device policy (dated 09/2019), and Code Pink-Missing Resident/Elopement policy (dated 04/2023). At this same time, a binder labeled, Exit Seeking Residents, contained an Exit Seeking Profile, A current Face Sheet, and a large color photograph of all residents who have been identified as elopement risks. R2 and R3's medical records were reviewed and indicate staff have been checking their elopement alert bracelets for placement and functionality as indicated. On 07/10/23, V1 provided copies of Attendance Sign-In Sheets for the following in-services: Elopement Policy & Procedure, Identifying Risks of Elopement, Wandering/Exit Seeking Behavior, and When to Provide/Implement Increased Supervision (Initiated on 05/18/24); Elopement and (Elopement Alert Bracelets), (initiated on 05/18/24); 1:1 Supervision (specific to nursing staff who provide 1:1 supervision, initiated on 05/24/24); Supervision of Elopement Risk Residents Outdoors (initiated on 06/06/24). These forms contained facility staff member's signatures confirming attendance, and these forms also document 30 staff members were called on 07/09/24 and given the in-service per telephone conversation. On 07/10/24, the following staff members were interviewed and indicated receiving the above noted in-servicing in May 2024: V15 (Licensed Practical Nurse); V18 (Registered Nurse); and V3, V21, and V24 (Certified Nursing Assistants). On 07/10/24 at 10:50 AM, V16 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated he was called by someone at the facility on 07/09/24 and was given in-servicing and education over the phone at that time. On 07/10/24 at 10:52 AM, V17 (Activity Aide) stated she received instructional training, I was told (R1) was placed on 1:1 supervision, so I know he had a sitter. I only work twice a week, so I did not attend any education in-services back in May when (R1) left the building. On 07/10/24 at 11:15 AM, V19 (Receptionist/Hairdresser) stated, I am going to be honest with you. I just received training about elopement this morning (07/10/24). My phone was not available last night, but I did see that someone tried to call me. I knew that (R1) left the building and I knew the door code had been changed. This morning is the first time that I have received education from anyone about the incident. The elopement policy and protocol, who to contact, how to handle a situation with someone trying to leave the building, the chain of command to report to, and resident behaviors were the topics discussed with me this morning. On 07/10/24 at 11:35 AM, V20 (Housekeeping) stated he just received training regarding elopement on 07/09/24, They called me yesterday and told me everything over the phone and then someone talked to me when I arrived at work this morning. On 07/10/24 at 12:05 PM, V22 (Dietary Cook) stated she was called yesterday and given training pertaining to elopement and supervision over the phone. On 07/10/24 at 01:35 PM, V23 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated she knew about the elopement that occurred on 05/18/24 and was aware R1 was on 1:1 supervision for a period of time after he eloped from the building. When asked if she had received education after R1's elopement V23 stated, I was called yesterday (07/09/24) and given education over the phone. That is the first time I have received education about the elopement. On 07/10/24, V1 provided a copy of the facility's Quality Assurance form titled 'Ad Hoc Quality Assurance (Plan of Correction)' which was completed on 05/21/24 regarding the facility's elopement policy and procedure, and indicated responses for each of the following questions: The problem?, How the problem is to be corrected and when will it be corrected?; and What is going to happen to ensure the problem will not happen again? How will this be monitored, by whom and how often? V1 then stated the facility's next Quality Assurance Meeting is scheduled for 07/25/24, and elopement/supervision will be discussed at this meeting and will continue to be reviewed during the next four quarterly meetings.
Apr 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Antibiotic Stewardship (Tag F0881)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1) implement an antibiotic stewardship program that included assessing and monitoring residents for signs and symptoms of infections; 2) en...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1) implement an antibiotic stewardship program that included assessing and monitoring residents for signs and symptoms of infections; 2) ensure antibiotic usage was appropriate, and 3) use of a nationally recognized surveillance criteria to define infections for 3 of 3 (R34, R57, R58) residents reviewed for the Antibiotic Stewardship Program in the sample of 37. Findings include: The Antibiotic/Antimicrobial Stewardship Program-Mission Statement & Guidelines dated 11/2017 documented, The Consultant Pharmacist will review the use of antibiotics by performing medication regimen review, reviewing the clinical record and laboratory results, and making recommendations regarding antibiotic use. Tracking and Monitoring Review the clinical record for new antibiotic starts to determine whether the clinical assessment, prescription documentation and antibiotic selection were in accordance with the antibiotic stewardship practices. When conducted over time, monitoring process monitors can assess whether antibiotic prescribing policies are being followed by staff and clinicians. Data gathered each month related to antibiotic use and treatment of infections will be submitted and reviewed by the QA (Quality Assurance) Committee. Data will be compared month to month to identify trends. The Facility's Infection Surveillance Monthly Report and the Pharmacist's Antibiotic Report for September 2023 through March 2024 list the antibiotic use activity for the facility. These logs do not contain whether or not cultures were obtained (where appropriate), whether any testing was done to confirm infections (where appropriate) or if there were any trends in infections according to caregivers, location or any other sources that could be controlled. 1. On 9/26/23 the Progress Note documented R34 was sent to the hospital due to increasing lethargy, increased heart rate and respiratory rate, cough, decreased breath sounds and decreasing oxygen levels. R34's hospital records dated 9/26/23 through 9/29/23 documented R34 was treated for Severe Sepsis secondary to catheter associated Urinary Tract Infection and Proteus Mirabilis Bacteremia (Blood Infection) and was discharged on Bactrim antibiotic. The Infection Surveillance Monthly Report dated September 2023 documented R34's signs and symptoms, Chest X-Ray positive for new infiltrates consistent with pneumonia and lacked the urine and blood culture results from the 9/26/23 hospitalization. 2. On 2/19/24 R57's Progress Note documented, Order Bactrim DS 800-160mg (milligrams) twice daily for 10 days due to drainage from incision site. R57's hospital records dated 9/26/24 through date of death documented R57 was treated for sepsis related to Pneumonia or Urinary Tract Infection. The hospital records scanned into the medical record consisted of a History and Physical dated 9/26/24 and a medication list only. The record lacked cultures, laboratory findings and/or x-rays. The Infection Surveillance Monthly Report dated February 2024 lacked documentation of R57's Infection, Signs and Symptoms and Physician/Pharmacy Order for 9/19/24 and 9/26/24 hospitalization. 3. On 2/3/24, R58's Progress Notes documented, Skin slightly red at distal end of right thigh incision site. Site remains closed. It was slightly red when R58 saw Ortho (Orthopedic Physician), but Orthopedic Physician did not order anything or say that it was an issue. R58 mentioned it to (Primary Care Physician/PCP) so PCP ordered Bactrim DS. Nurse doesn't notice any thrush on R58's tongue but PCP ordered Nystatin swish and swallow after R58 complained that R58's throat was sore and voice, hoarse. R58's voice has been this way and has unchanged since admission. The Infection Surveillance Monthly Report dated February 2024 lacked documentation of R58's Infection, Signs and Symptoms and Physician/Pharmacy Order for the Bactrim and Nystatin medications administered. The Quality Assurance Meeting Minutes dated November 2023 lacked an Antimicrobial Stewardship review. On 4/10/24, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, We don't have access to the medical records. If a patients Infection is resolved by the time they return to the facility, I don't worry about the result (type of infection treated during hospitalization. It doesn't affect us. V2 agreed R34 and R57's infections were not listed on the infection control tracking log. V2 agreed not all facility infections and antibiotic use were not tracked and trended. On 4/11/24, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated the Pharmacist emails an Antibiotic Report to V2 monthly. V2 stated, This is all I get. I don't have any of their (Pharmacy) protocols or determine what they look at.
Oct 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to meet the needs of the residents for four residents (R1, R2, R4, and R5) out of five residents reviewed for a...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to meet the needs of the residents for four residents (R1, R2, R4, and R5) out of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living and call lights in a sample of five. Findings include: The facility's Bathing - Shower and Tub Bath policy dated 8/2023 documents, A shower, tub bath or bed/sponge bath will be offered according to resident's preference, no less than once per week or according to the resident's preferred frequency and as needed or requested. The facility's Call Light policy dated 7/2023 documents Purpose: To respond to resident's requests and needs in a timely and courteous manner. Guidelines: 1. Answer light (signal) promptly. 3. Turn off call light. 5. Respond to request, if item is not available, or request questionable, get assistance from charge nurse. Return to resident with prompt reply. 6. Offer further assistance before leaving resident's room. The facility's Facility Assessment dated 8/2020 through 7/2024 documents the following direct care staffing numbers: Six CNAs on day shift (6:00 AM - 2:00 PM), five CNAs on evening shift (2:00 PM - 10:00 PM) and three CNAs on night shift (10:00 PM - 6:00 AM) with an average resident census of 58-60. The facility's Certified Nursing Assistant Schedule (CNA) dated October 2023 documents the following staffing numbers: On 10/2 four CNAs on evening shift with a one on one (1:1) CNA. 10/5 three CNAs from 2:00 PM - 6:00 PM with two 1:1 CNAs and then four CNAs from 6:00 PM - 10:00 PM with two 1:1 CNAs. 10/6 four CNAs on evening shift with two 1:1 CNAs. 10/9 four CNAs on evening shift with one 1:1 CNA. 10/13 three CNAs on evening shift with two orientation CNA and one 1:1 CNA. 10/15 four CNAs on evening shift with one orientation CNA and one 1:1 CNA. On 10/17/23 at 11:00, V3, Infection Preventionist (IP), stated, The employees on the schedule with the O after their names are on orientation and don't count towards the staffing numbers. The resident roster dated 10/17/23 and verified by V3, IP, documents 61 residents residing in the facility. The facility's Resident Council Minutes dated 10/16/23 documents, Staff still turning off call lights and not coming back right away or returning when they say they will be right back. Said this has gotten better but is still happening in the evening. The facility's CNA resident information sheet documents 17 out of the 33 residents on the East Hall are a two person assist with transfers. 1. On 10/17/23 at 9:44 AM, R1 stated, I get at least two showers a week and the staff get me changed frequently. The only issue I have is with the call light. In the evening usually between 6:00 PM - 9:00 PM, it takes the staff anywhere from five to 30 minutes to answer the call light. I don't think it's taken longer than 30 minutes, but it happens a lot more than it should. There are times that they will come in, turn off my light and leave and I have to push my call light again because they don't return. There have been a few times that I've had to wait longer to get ready for bed, but that's really not that much of an issue. 2. On 10/17/23 at 3:23 PM, R2 stated, I do like to go to bed early. Sometimes I've had to wait. I'll push my call light, the staff will come in, turn it off and leave and not return. I usually wait about 10 minutes, and I'll push it again. It usually takes them 10-15 minutes to answer my call light each time. R2 verified staff can take up to 45 minutes to address her need from the first time she pushed her call light. R2's medical record documents R2 is a two person assist with transfers. 3. On 10/17/23 at 3:30 PM, R4 stated, There are times they gave me a bed bath when I was supposed to have a shower. I asked why and they said they didn't have enough staff to give me a shower, so they were going to give me a bed bath. About three weeks ago, I got skipped completely and when I asked why I didn't get my shower, they told me it was because they didn't have enough people. I keep getting bed baths when I want a shower. It can take up to 40 minutes for them to answer my call light. It's mostly in the evening after dinner. R4's medical record documents R4 is a two person assist with transfers and requires staff assistance with showers. R4's shower sheet dated 9/18/23 through 10/23 documents the following: R4 received a shower on 9/23, bed bath on 9/21, one shower the week of 9/28, a bed bath on 10/2, 10/5 and 10/9, a shower on 10/12 and bed bath on 10/16. The facility's resident shower schedule documents R4 is to receive two showers a week during the evening shift. 4. On 10/17/23 at 3:35 PM, R5 stated, I've had showers skipped. I will tell you that I have refused showers before, but not every time. I've had staff come in, tell me it's my shower day and then they never return. I'm supposed to get my shower in the evening. I'll do a bed bath if that's all they have time for, but I prefer a shower. R5's medical record documents R5 is a two person assist with transfers and requires staff assistance with showers. R5's shower sheet dated 9/19/23 through 10/14/23 documents the following: R5 received a shower on 9/19 and 9/23, one bed bath the week of 9/26 with no refusals documented, a refusal on 10/3, a bed bath on 10/7, a refusal on 10/10 and shower on 10/14. The facility's resident shower schedule documents R5 is to receive two showers a week during the evening shift. On 10/17/23 at 2:19 PM, V4, CNA stated, Normally we have management here to do the 1:1, but when management leaves around dinner time, we have to pull one of the CNAs off the floor to cover the 1:1 leaving us with four CNAs on the floor. At 6:00 PM it turns into rush time, and we wind up having to give fast care versus quality care. There are times when showers are skipped. On 10/17/23 at 2:22 PM, V5, CNA, stated, We usually run with four CNAs for the entire hall. Two on [NAME] Hall and Two on East Hall. The [NAME] Hall can run with two CNAs, but the East Hall needs three. Sometimes the showers on East Hall get skipped because it's a heavier hall. There's more two people assists over there than there is here. At 6:00 PM, it becomes rush hour, and the halls light up like a Christmas tree with all the call lights. On 10/17/23 at 2:29 PM, V6, CNA, stated, We run with four CNAs for the entire building on 2nd shift (Evening shift) and we need five. East hall needs three CNAs. There are times it can take up to 20 minutes to answer a call light, especially after 6:00 PM. It becomes very busy after 6:00 PM with all the call lights, transfers, and incontinence care and with only two CNAs on the East Hall, there are times we can't get showers done. I know we had to give (R4) and (R5) a bed bath because we didn't have time for a shower. At night, there are times we don't get the residents to bed until 9:30 PM. I know there are a couple of residents who like to go to bed around 7:00 - 8:00 PM, but they didn't get to bed until after 9:00 PM. On 10/17/23 at 2:32 PM, V7, CNA, stated, We almost always have four CNAs on evening shift leaving two on East Hall, but we really need three CNAs on East Hall, especially after 4:00 PM. It's a heavier hall and we have a lot more (mechanical lift) residents over here. If you have two CNAs on East Hall and it takes two CNAs for a (mechanical lift) transfer, then there's no CNAs out here to answer call lights and we have to count on [NAME] Hall coming over to answer call lights. There have been times where we answer call lights, shut them off, tell the resident we'll be back, but forget to go back. I know (R2) was complaining about it. With only two CNAs on this hall, we have to prioritize our cares. The incontinence care and feeding are a priority. When we answer the call light, we have to prioritize and sometimes we forget to return. (R2) also complained about getting to bed late. She likes to go to bed pretty much after dinner, but there are times we can't get to her until 8:00 PM or after due to staffing. Yes, showers on East Hall get skipped. Like I was saying, we have to prioritize what gets done and if we don't have time for a shower, it gets skipped. On 10/17/323 at 2:39 PM, V8, CNA stated, A lot of the times there's only four CNAs on evening shift. With only having two CNAs on East Hall, there are times that we have to skip the showers. I know (R4) didn't get a shower because we didn't have enough staff. There are also a few residents like (R1 and R2) that want to go to bed after dinner or around 7:00 PM and we can't get them to bed until sometimes 9:00 PM or after. There are also times we've had to leave residents on the toilet longer than what they should have been because of the staffing. We were just too busy to get to everyone. After 6:00 PM, it gets really busy, and we need a third CNA on this hall. Call lights can go off for 20-30 minutes before they get answered, especially around dinner time. If we only have four CNAs on evening and one has to be in each dining room (two separate dining rooms) and one has to assist with feeding, that leaves one CNA for both [NAME] and East Hall to answer call lights. We just can't get to all the call lights in time. On 10/18/23 at 10:08 AM, V8, Regional Director, stated I know our call light policy says to answer in a timely manner, but 30 to 45 minutes is excessive.
Mar 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the medications as ordered by the physician to two (R32 and R103) of five residents reviewed for medication administration in a sample of 25. This fa...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the medications as ordered by the physician to two (R32 and R103) of five residents reviewed for medication administration in a sample of 25. This failure resulted in two medication errors out of 25 opportunities for error for an 8.0% error rate. Findings include: The facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 1-11-10, documents Objective: To provide accuracy during medication pass to assure quality care for residents. Policy: It is the policy of this facility to accurately administer medication following physician's orders. 1. On 2-28-23, at 10:00am, V6 Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN measured out 2.0 gm (grams) of Diclofenac Sodium 1% topical gel four times and applied the 2.0 gm of gel to R103's right hip, right knee, and both hands. R103's current Physician Order Sheet/POS documents an order for Diclofenac Sodium 1% topical gel apply to hands, right knee, right hip QID (four times per day) for diagnosis of pain - apply 2.0 gm to affected areas above the waist and 4.0 gm below the waist. On 3-1-23, at 11:50am, V6 LPN verified that the order for R103 documents to apply two grams above the waist and four grams below the waist. V6 stated V6 should have put four grams (of the gel) on (R103's) right knee and right hip and two grams on (R103's) hands. 2. On 2-28-23, at 11:42am, V6 LPN administered Lamictal one half tab (50 mg/milligrams) with Acetaminophen 325 mg two tabs to R32. R32 swallowed all the medications together at one time. R32's medication card for Lamictal includes pharmacy labels which document, Dissolve in mouth or under tongue and Do not chew or swallow whole. On 3-1-23, at 11:46am, V6 LPN stated that V6 has always given Lamictal to (R32) that way. (R32) has taken it for a long time and V6 didn't want to question (R32) on how (R32) takes it. V6 stated V6 should have had (R32) take it under (R32's) tongue or hold it in (R32's) mouth.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

ased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and labeled with identification and dates; and failed to ensure a bleach cleaning chemical was not stor...

Read full inspector narrative →
ased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and labeled with identification and dates; and failed to ensure a bleach cleaning chemical was not stored on the floor in the kitchen. These failures have the potential to affect all 56 residents at the facility. Findings include: The facility's Chemical Policies and Storage Policy, dated 2/2022, documents: Chemicals will be stored away from the food supply in a separate, locked room or a locked cabinet. The facility's Food-Labeling and Dating Policy, dated 2/2022, documents: Labeling and dating food is important to assure foods are used in a timely manner. 1. Proper food labeling includes: Name of product, date stored and, in some cases, the time of the day. 2. The food must be labeled and dated if it is removed from its original container. 3. Left over foods placed in a container must be cooled down properly, labeled and dated. On 2/28/23 at 8:30am, one large, open bag of frozen chicken breasts, one open half full bag of frozen corn, and four bags of frozen hashbrowns in the walk-in freezer were not labeled or dated. V6 Certified Dietary Manager/CDM stated that these items should have been labeled and dated when opened or when not in their original container and stated that these should not have been in the freezer without labels and dates. On 2/28/23 at this same time, a large bowl filled with small containers of approximately 30 Milliliters/ml of syrup in the facility's walk-in refrigerator was not labeled with identification or date. V6 stated, The label must have fallen off, there was one there; there should have been a label and date on the bowl. On 2/28/23 at 8:30am, a large unopened box of flour in the facility's dry goods storage room had an expiration date of 9/21/22; a half full barrel containing sugar and a half-filled barrel of flour in the facility's dry goods storage room were not labeled with identification and were not dated. V6 stated at this time that the box of flour should have been thrown out when it expired; and stated that the barrels of sugar and floor would be discarded as well and should have been dated and labeled. V6 stated, We went through all the items in here (dry goods storage room) and threw out of lot of expired items, thought we got them all; not sure how we missed these. On 2/28/23 at 8:30am, an opened container of (Bleach) used for cleaning was on the floor in the kitchen near the dishwashing area. V6 stated at this time, This bleach should not be on the floor; it should be locked inside our chemicals room; I don't know why it was on the floor. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services/CMS 672) form, dated 2/28/23, documents 56 residents reside in the facility.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Information (Tag F0732)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staffing information was posted with accurate hours and completed daily. This failure has the potential to af...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staffing information was posted with accurate hours and completed daily. This failure has the potential to affect all 56 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 2-28-23, at 10:00am, the Daily Staffing Report, included staffing hours for dates of 2-26-23, 2-27-23, and 2-28-23. The hours listed for Certified Nursing Assistants/CNAs on 2-27-23 is 45 for 6am-2pm. On 3-2-23, at 2:25pm, the posted Daily Staffing Reports for February 2023 do not document any CNA hours for 2-19-23 from 6am-2pm; nor for Registered Nurses/RNs, Licensed Practical Nurses/LPNs or CNAs for 6am-2pm on 2-20-23. On 03-02-23, at 11:24am, V5 CNA Supervisor/Scheduler stated that the Daily Staffing Report sheets are completed either by herself or nursing - usually the RN who is in charge. The nurses are supposed to do it, but (V5) will fill it in if they didn't. V5 does not oversee it and not sure who does. On 03-02-23, at 1:00pm, V4 RN stated, I try to write in the numbers on it (Daily Staffing Report sheet) at the beginning of the shift. It's hard to get the changes on it. The second shift nurse comes in at 6pm and does the next shift. If there are agency nurses, they probably don't even know to do it .We are responsible for it. On 03-02-23, at 2:35pm, V1 Administrator stated that the Daily Assignment Report sheets don't always get updated. The Daily Staffing Report is done by V5 Scheduler and the nurses. The nurse on the floor is ultimately responsible for overseeing that it is done and reflects the changes. V1 verified at this time that the hours for CNAs on February 27 are incorrect since they only had 30 hours on day shift and not 45. V1 also verified at this time there are no hours for any staffing on 2-20-23 and no CNA hours on 2-19-23. The facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) dated 2-28-23 and signed by V2 Director of Nursing, documents 56 residents currently reside in the facility.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 27 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • Grade F (21/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Arc At El Paso's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns ARC AT EL PASO an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Arc At El Paso Staffed?

CMS rates ARC AT EL PASO's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 45%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care. RN turnover specifically is 57%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Arc At El Paso?

State health inspectors documented 27 deficiencies at ARC AT EL PASO during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 24 with potential for harm, and 2 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Arc At El Paso?

ARC AT EL PASO is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by ARCADIA CARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 65 certified beds and approximately 54 residents (about 83% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in EL PASO, Illinois.

How Does Arc At El Paso Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, ARC AT EL PASO's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (45%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Arc At El Paso?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Arc At El Paso Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, ARC AT EL PASO has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Arc At El Paso Stick Around?

ARC AT EL PASO has a staff turnover rate of 45%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Arc At El Paso Ever Fined?

ARC AT EL PASO has been fined $8,994 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Illinois average of $33,169. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Arc At El Paso on Any Federal Watch List?

ARC AT EL PASO is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.