FAIRFIELD SENIOR LIVING & REHABILITATION LLC

305 N.W. 11TH STREET, FAIRFIELD, IL 62837 (618) 842-3036
For profit - Corporation 104 Beds WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
0/100
#522 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: May 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Fairfield Senior Living & Rehabilitation LLC has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. Ranked #522 out of 665 facilities in Illinois, they fall in the bottom half, and are the least favorable option in Wayne County, where they are ranked #3 out of 3. While the facility is showing signs of improvement, reducing issues from 21 in 2024 to just 1 in 2025, there are still serious concerns, including a critical incident where a resident's insulin administration was mishandled, posing a risk of severe health complications. Staffing turnover is a positive aspect, at 0%, which is much lower than the state average, and they have good RN coverage, exceeding that of 83% of facilities in Illinois. However, the facility has accumulated $110,110 in fines and has reported serious safety incidents, such as a resident experiencing anxiety and potential harm during a mechanical lift transfer due to inadequate procedures.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Illinois
#522/665
Bottom 22%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
21 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
Turnover data not reported for this facility.
Penalties
○ Average
$110,110 in fines. Higher than 73% of Illinois facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 49 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Illinois. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
51 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 21 issues
2025: 1 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Illinois average (2.5)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Federal Fines: $110,110

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 51 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening 9 actual harm
Feb 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0919 (Tag F0919)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was in working order fo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was in working order for 1 (R8) of 3 residents reviewed for resident call system in a sample of 12. Findings Include: R8's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 12/05/2024 with diagnoses that included weakness, unsteadiness on feet, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, a unilateral primary osteoarthritis to right knee and personal history of transient ischemic attack. R8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented under Cognitive Patterns a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating R8 is cognitively intact. Under Functional Abilities for Self Care, the MDS documented that R8 requires staff assistance for toileting hygiene, showering/bathing, and dressing. R8's current Care Plan documented a Focus Area of I have a self care deficit r/t (related to) osteoarthritis in right knee and weakness with a Goal of Assistance will be provided to meet needs. On 2/14/24 at 11:00 AM, R8 stated that her only concern is that the night shift does not answer her call light. At this time, surveyor pushed R8's call light and it did not light up. R8 stated she was unaware that her call light was broken. On 2/14/25 at 11:30 AM, V7 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) entered R8's room. Surveyor showed V7 that R8's call light was not working. At this time, V7 clicked the call light quickly approximately 5 times and it turned on, but after that could not get it to work again. Surveyor then asked V7 if R8 would know to do that and V7 stated no. V7 confirmed the call light was not working as it should. On 2/14/25 at 1:00 PM, V7 stated that she had not yet informed anyone that R8's call light was broken. V8 (Regional Clinical Nurse) was present at this time and immediately went to get the maintenance man to fix the call light. On 2/14/25 at 2:00 PM, V17 (Regional Maintenance Director) stated there was a short in the cord that needed replaced and that has been done. On 2/4/2025 at 1:20 PM, V16 (Family) stated, there have been multiple times she had hit the call light with no staff member to answer it. V10 stated, one time it took 35 minutes for a staff member to answer the call light. The Facility Call Light Use/Response policy (undated) documented the following under Call Light Maintenance: Any issues regarding inappropriate operations of a call light, must be reported to the Director of Nursing or Administrator immediately. DON or Administrator will work with Maintenance to correct the issue and if necessary, provide alternate plan to provide call light availability to resident.
Sept 2024 3 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe mechanical lift transfer for 1 of 1 resident (R1) re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe mechanical lift transfer for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for falls in a sample of 12. This failure resulted in R1 becoming scared she would fall and anxious during the transfer and becoming afraid of of future mechanical lift transfers. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 7/6/23 and listed Diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder, Diabetes Type 2, and Anxiety disorder. R1's Care Plan dated 8/20/24 documented problem areas,I have an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care/ mobility performance (functional abilities) deficit, and, I use anti anxiety medications. R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented that R1 has minimal deficits in cognition and is totally dependent on staff for transfers. On 9/17/24 at 10:55am, R1 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R1 stated that on the morning of 9/16/24, V4, Certified Nursing Assistant, was getting her out of bed and ready for a doctors appointment. R1 stated she had two family members present at the time. R1 stated V4 transferred R1 out of the bed into the wheelchair via mechanical lift. R1 stated V4 was the only staff member present during the transfer. R1 stated, Thank God those two (V10, V11, family members) were in the room to help because I about got dumped out of the (lift) sling. I don't think (V4) knows how to use a (mechanical lift). R1's was upset and distressed while discussing this. R1 stated she was extremely upset and scared that she was going to be dumped out of the sling. R1 stated now she is scared for staff to transfer her via mechanical lift and that is the only way for her to be transferred out of the bed. On 9/17/24 at 1:00pm V10 stated she was present during the above referenced transfer. V10 stated she and V11 assisted V4 with the transfer as V4 was the only staff member present. V10 stated she and V4 stood at the wheelchair while V11 worked the controls on the mechanical lift. V10 stated V4 was giving the directions about what to do. V10 stated the mechanical lift started heavily leaning to one side and R1 was hovering over the wheelchair in a nearly laying down position. V10 stated V10 and V11 got R1 under the arms and lowered R1 into the chair. V10 stated R1 was, Upset and scared to death. On 9/18/24 at 1:50pm, V4 corroborated R1 and V10's accounts of the transfer as stated above. V4 stated they were short staffed that day, and she could not find any staff to help with the transfer so V10 and V11 assisted, with V11 working the controls. V4 stated later V4 was called in by administrative staff because R1 told others about what happened and that she was scared. V4 stated,They told me next time if I cant find somebody come get administrative staff. On 9/19/24 at 12:50pm, V2, Director of Nurses, stated the incident with R1's transfer had come to her attention and she talked to V4 about it. V2 stated V4 said she couldn't find anybody to help, and was told to ask administrative staff to help next time. V2 confirmed it is against facility policy for there to be fewer than 2 staff members present and for family members to assist with a mechanical lift transfer. V2 stated she did not complete an incident report. A Mechanical Gait Belt and Mechanical Lift Policy dated 11/28/12 documented,The transferring needs of residents will be assessed on an ongoing basis and designated into one of the following categories: H: Mechanical lift (trade name) with 2 caregivers.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers and timely assistance with showers and incontinence...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers and timely assistance with showers and incontinence care for five of twelve residents (R1, R2, R3, R6, R7) reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care in the sample of twelve. Findings include: 1. R1's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 7/6/23 and listed Diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Diabetes Type 2, and Morbid Obesity. R1's Current Care Plan a problem area, I have an ADL self-care/ mobility performance (functional abilities) deficit, with a corresponding intervention, Shower/Bathe self: I take a shower/bath (and) my usual performance is dependent on staff. The same Care Plan documented a problem area, I have a potential for impairment to skin integrity related to decreased mobility, (and)incontinence, with a corresponding intervention, Keep skin clean and dry. R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented that R1 is totally dependent on staff for bathing/showering and toileting and is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 9/17/24 at 10:55am, R1 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R1 stated that she is incontinent and staff don't change her as often as she needs it. On 9/17/24 at 1pm, V10, family member of R1, stated she visits several times per week, always during day shift. V10 stated she will come in in the morning and R1 is soaked with urine and tells her she has been that way for hours. V10 stated she comes in daily because she is scared R1 won't get changed if she doesn't. 2. R2's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 4/19/23 and listed Diagnoses including Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, Malignant Neoplasm of the Uterus, and Major Depressive Disorder. R2's Current Care Plan a problem area, I have an ADL self-care/mobility performance (functional abilities) deficit that may fluctuate with activity throughout the day, with a corresponding intervention, Shower/Bathe self: I take a shower/bed bath, and my usual performance is dependent (on staff). R2's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented that R2 is totally dependent on staff for toileting and showering/bathing and is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R2's Shower Sheets for September 2024 document zero showers for that month. On 9/17/24 at 10:25am, R2 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R2 stated she is not always getting a shower or bath twice a week. 3. R3's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 1/3/24 and listed Diagnoses including Cerebral Palsy, Heart Failure, and Hypertension. R3's Current Care Plan a problem area,I have alteration in urinary elimination, urinary incontinence, related to impaired mobility, and lack of sensation, with a corresponding interventions, Ensure call light is within reach and answer promptly, monitor for incontinence and change as needed. R3's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented that R3 is totally dependent on staff for toileting and showering/bathing and is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 9/17/24 at 9:55am, R3 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R3 stated he thinks night shift is especially short staffed, it can take over an hour for his call light call light and stated he is sometimes wet for hours at a time. 4. R6's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 3/31/24 and listed Diagnoses including COPD, Morbid Obesity, and Diabetes Type 2. R6's Current Care Plan a problem area, I have an ADL self-care/mobility performance (functional abilities) deficit that may fluctuate with activity throughout the day, with a corresponding intervention,Shower/Bathing self: I take a shower and my usual performance is set up/clean up assistance (from staff). R6's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented that R6 requires set up or clean up assistance from staff for showering/bathing and is always continent of bowel and bladder. R6's August 2024 Shower Sheets document R6 received one shower on the week of 8/18/24. On 9/18/24 at 10:45am, R6 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R6 stated call lights are not answered quickly enough, especially on the 6pm to 6am shift, and, There are always residents yelling for help for extended periods of time, and the emergency call lights in the bathroom are going off for up to 15 minutes because nobody is answering them. R6 stated she is independent for showering except she needs staff to dry her feet, and she is afraid she will fall if she has wet feet. R6 stated she, Turns on the shower room call light, which is an emergency light, and has to wait there til somebody comes, which might be 15 minutes later, or not at all. Last week nobody came so I sat on the chair part of my walker and scooted up to the nurses station for help. 5. R7's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 9/5/24, and listed diagnoses including Dementia, Severe, with Agitation, Hypertension, and Anxiety Disorder. R7's Current Care Plan a problem area, I have potential for altered activity pattern related to Dementia. R7's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented that R7 is dependent on staff for toileting and showering/bathing and is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 9/18/24 at 11:45am, R7 was alert only to herself, and she was being fed a puree meal by her family member V7. V7 stated R7 has lived at the facility, For a couple of weeks. V7 stated R7 is incontinent and is not being changed often enough. V7 stated she visits several times a day at different times of the day, and has found R7 soaking wet with wet clothes multiple times. On 9/19/24 at 12:50pm, V2, Director of Nurses, stated residents are to get two shower per week and in between as desired or needed. On 9/20/24 at 2:00 pm, V2 stated it is her expectation that all call lights for assistance should be answered within three minutes. A Resident Council Meeting note dated 9/12/24 documented, New business: Nursing-hard to find (staff) when needing assistance. An Incontinence Care Policy dated 11/28/12 documented, Incontinent residents will be checked periodically in accordance with the assessed incontinent episodes or every two hours and provided perineal and genital care after each episode. A Shower and Tub Bath Policy dated 11/28/12 stated,A shower, tub bath,or bed/sponge bath will be offered according to the resident's preference two times per week or according to the resident's preferred frequency and as needed or requested.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide direct care staff in adequate numbers to ensure safe and timely resident care. This has the ability to affect all 34 residents livi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide direct care staff in adequate numbers to ensure safe and timely resident care. This has the ability to affect all 34 residents living on the [NAME] and Daisy/Tulip halls. Findings include: A Resident Council Meeting note dated 9/12/24 documented, New business: Nursing-hard to find (staff) when needing assistance. A Room Roster dated 9/14/24 documented a total of 34 residents living on the [NAME] and Daisy/Tulip halls. A Daily Staff Schedule for Friday 8/31/24 documented one nurse and two CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) working the [NAME] and Daisy/Tulip halls on the 6am to 6pm shift. A Daily Staff Schedule for Sunday 9/15/24 documented one nurse and one CNA working the [NAME] and Daisy/Tulip halls on the 6pm to 6am shift. A Daily Staff Schedule for Monday 9/16/24 documented one nurse and 3 CNAs working the [NAME] and Daisy/Tulip halls on the 6am to 6pm shift. On 9/17/24 at 9:55am, R3 was alert and oriented to person, place and time. R3 stated night shift (6pm to 6am) is especially short staffed because call lights can take over an hour to be answered. R3 stated medications are frequently passed late, and it happens on all shifts, both through the week and one weekends. On 9/17/24 at 10:25am, R2 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R2 stated, They are definitely short staffed all the time, through the week and on the weekend, and on days and nights both. On 9/17/24 at 10:55am, R1 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R1 stated that on the morning of 9/16/24, V4, Certified Nursing Assistant, transferred R1 out of the bed into the wheelchair via mechanical lift without another staff member present. On 9/18/24 at 10:15pm, V12, Registered Nurse, stated there are always enough CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) scheduled, but there are daily call ins, both through the week and on weekends. On 9/18/24 at 10:45am, R6 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R6 stated, Staffing is hit or miss as to whether they have enough staff, weekends are worse, they seem to have a lot of call ins, both day and night shift. R6 stated medications on the 6pm to 6am shift are frequently passed late, both through the week and on the weekends. On 9/18/24 at 1:50pm, V4 stated she works both the 6am to 6pm and 6pm to 6am shifts both through the week and on weekends. V4 stated they are, Always short staffed because of last minute call ins. V4 confirmed she transferred R1 via mechanical lift on 9/16/24 without another staff member present. V4 stated on that date on the 6am to 6pm shift, she could not find any direct care staff to help with the transfer because they were working short staffed V4 stated residents complain about medications being passed late on the 6pm to 6am shift. On 9/18/24 at 2:20pm, V5, CNA, stated the facility frequently runs short of CNA's. V5 stated on 8/31/24 she worked 6am to 6pm with V8, CNA, and V13, Licensed Practical Nurse, on the Daisy/Tulip halls. V5 stated another CNA had also come in at 6am but had to leave due to a family emergency, so V6, Registered Nurse/Minimum Data Set Coordinator, came in to work as a CNA at around 9 am. V 5 stated V13 walked out without giving notice at around 2pm, leaving V6 to cover the nursing duties. V5 stated that left only V5 and V8 to provide direct care for the remainder of the shift. On 9/18/23 at 2:40pm, V8 confirmed V5's report of 8/31/24. V8 stated it is not the only occasion she and V5 have worked alone on [NAME] and Daisy/Tulip. V8 stated they are supposed to have at least 4 CNAs on [NAME] and Daisy/Tulip on both shifts. V8 stated she works the 6am to 6pm shift Monday through Friday and every other weekend. V8 stated she has heard complaints from residents about medication pass running late. On 9/19/24 at 11:10am, V4, Licensed Practical Nurse, stated she is the staff member responsible for scheduling the CNA staff, and V2, Director of Nurses, is the staff member responsible for scheduling nursing staff. V4 stated in addition to their own staff, the facility utilizes a staffing company that provides contractual licensed and CNA staff. V4 stated for both the 6am to 6pm and 6pm to 6am shifts, she schedules 4 or 5 CNAs and V2 schedules two nurses for the [NAME] and Daisy/Tulip halls, and one nurse and 2 CNAs for the [NAME] hall memory care unit. V4 stated administrative staff frequently have to work the floor both to cover licensed staff and CNA staff due to call ins. V4 stated the 2 CNAs on [NAME] hall very rarely float to [NAME] and Daisy/Tulip halls. V4 stated there have been occasions where there may have only been two CNAs to cover [NAME] Daisy/Tulip for an hour or so, until coverage could be obtained. On 9/19/24 at 12:50pm, V2, Director of Nursing, stated she believed the facility is meeting or exceeding minimum staffing requirements. V2 stated CNA call ins are an issue but coverage can usually be found. V2 stated she had to pass medications the morning of 9/17/24 due to staff member calling in. V2 stated morning medication pass usually starts about 6:30am with getting supplies ready, but she did not get started until about 7:30am. V2 stated as far as she is aware medications are being passed timely and she has not heard any complaints from residents about medications being late.
Aug 2024 4 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and evaluate potential hazards/risks and imp...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and evaluate potential hazards/risks and implement interventions to ensure safe transfers via mechanical lifts for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for accident hazards and injuries of unknown origin in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining injuries of bruising to the tops of both feet and a hematoma under the nail of the right great toe. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet documented an initial admission date of 7/23/20 with diagnoses that included unsteadiness of feet, lack of coordination, abnormalities of gait and mobility, adult failure to thrive, and cerebrovascular disease. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating R1 had moderate cognitive impairment. On 8/23/24 at 1:00 PM, R1's right great toenail was black with blood under the nail. R1's feet had greenish yellow bruising to the tops of both feet measuring approximately 3 inches x 3 inches. R1 stated he did not know how his feet had been injured. R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 7/26/24 documented R1 did not have any bruising to the feet. R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 7/29/24 documented in part .Rt. (right) foot and leg was swollen and had bruises present, SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) reported no falls or injuries for (R1) . R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 8/2/24 documented in part . Lt (left) foot has a bruise on the top of foot size of a softball circle with purple/green in color. (Right) leg was swollen around ankle bone and had bruises present on top of the foot and side of ankle with purple/green bruise. SNF reported no falls or injuries . reported these findings to (V2 - Director of Nursing/DON). Pt (patient/R1) is unaware of how or when the bruise occurred . SN (Skilled Nurse) left a message with person answering (facility) work phone for Nurse on staff to give me a call, as SN needs a report of unknown bruise noted as staff nurses had not document on BLE (Bilateral Lower Extremities) having any bruise. (V7 - Registered Nurse/RN) on staff at SNF was not present during any SNV (Skilled Nurse Visit) and SN was unable to give (V7) report as no staff could find (V7) . R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 8/5/24 documented in part .Lt and Rt. feet bruises have improved no new bruises noted. SN spoke with (V13 - Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) and (V7) and stated SN needed a incident report since they have no report filled out stating that SNF staff has seen or document pt (R1) having bruises to BLE. Staff is supposed to write up a report stating that bruise are from unknown causes, both (V7) and (V13) voiced understanding . R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 8/9/24 documented in part .Lt and Rt. feet bruises have improved no new bruises noted. SN spoke with (V5/LPN) and (V2/DON). SN stated hospice needed a incident report since they have no report filled out stating that the SNF staff has seen or document (R1) having bruises to BLE. Staff was suppose to write up a report stating that bruise are from unknown causes, both (V7) and (V13) voiced understanding at last SNV and no report can be found or has been filled out per (V5) and (V2). (sic) Per (V2) a report will be filled out and SN can obtain a copy from them next week . R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 8/12/24 documented in part .Lt and Rt. feet bruises have improved no new bruises noted. SN spoke with (V3 - Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) SN stated hospice needed a incident report since they have no report filled out stating that the SNF staff has seen or document (R1) having bruises to BLE. Staff was suppose to write up a report stating that bruise are from unknown causes, report is filled out but is not signed by any of the nurses yet . R1's Hospice Visit Report dated 8/16/24 documented in part .SN received report from (V17- Hospice Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) that (R1) had bleeding to (right) great toe and bruising noted around toe nail bed. (R1's right) great toe has blood under toe nail bed . with bruising around nail bed noted. SN spoke with (V2) and (V3) and per them 'assessed toe d/t (due to) Hospice aide (V17/CNA) reported findings to (V2) and (V3)' . No reports noted of pt (patient) fall or injury noted per staff records. SN is still unable to get report from SNF of bruise noted on 8/2/24 as per (V2) and (V3) 'note is not signed yet' . R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 8/20/24 documented in part .brusied [sic] noted to Rt. great toe with dried blood under nail bed. SN reported SN findings to (V7/RN). SN still does not have report from 8/2/24 as it still not signed by RN .MD is aware of SN and CNA reporting SNF to (State Agency). R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented two progress notes on 8/11/24 that had been struck out citing incorrect documentation: R1's struck out progress note dated 8/11/24 at 1:58 AM documented in part Note Text: (R17) Follow up assessment completed. Bruising to top of left, right foot .reddish purple bruising noted . The note documents Strike Out Reason: Incorrect Documentation and Strike Out date: 8/14/24 09:05 (am). R1's struck out progress note dated 8/11/24 at 9:25 AM documented in part Note Text (R17) Follow up assessment completed. Bruising to top left of right foot .No skin issues noted. No Bruising noted. No s/s (signs/symptoms) of infection noted to site. No swelling noted. The note documents Strike Out Reason: Incorrect Documentation and Strike Out date: 8/14/24 09:05 (am). On 8/23/24 at 10:59 AM, V4 (Hospice RN) stated R1 had bruising found on 8/2/24 to the top of both feet about the size of a softball. V4 said she had reported the bruising to V2 (DON) when V4 found the bruising. V4 said that on 8/5/24, V4 had returned to the facility and V7 (RN) and V13 (LPN) said they were not aware of R1 having any injuries. V4 stated that on 8/9/24, she told V2 that V4 would need a report on the bruises because the staff could not tell V4 how R1 was injured and there was no documentation of the bruising in R1's medical record. V4 then stated that on 8/16/24, R1 was found to have bleeding and a hematoma under the right great toenail with surrounding bruising to the toe. V4 said the facility was not able to explain how R1's right great toe was injured. V4 said she had asked the facility several times for a report on R1's injuries of unknown origin but none had been provided. On 8/23/24 at 11:31 AM, V2 (DON) said staff would use the mechanical lift to transfer R1 when R1 was not feeling strong enough to stand for transfers. V2 said she thought the injuries to R1's feet had been caused by staff hitting R1's feet on the bar of the mechanical lift. On 8/27/24 at 11:00 AM, V16 (CNA) stated that the facility had several agency staff who don't care, and will hit resident's feet on the bar of the mechanical lift when transferring them. At the same time of this interview with V16, this surveyor observed a dark red substance that appeared to be dried blood on the center bar and central cross bar of the mechanical lift. On 8/27/24 at 11:11 AM, V1 (Administrator) verified the dark red substance found on the mechanical lift looked like blood. R1's Report to (State Agency) dated 8/28/24 documented in part .Interviews with staff revealed that resident is tall, a maximum assist, dependent with care. Resident is transferred by 2 staff or at times has had to use a (mechanical lift). Staff stated (R1) has bumped feet on (mechanical lift) before. Staff interviews revealed that resident has been observed to also attempt to self transfer, pulls rolling wheelchair toward him .Interview with (R1) revealed that (R1) was unable to tell me what happened but he could tell me he was alright and having no pain in feet . The facility's revised 10/24/22 Abuse Prevention and Reporting - (State) policy documented in part .Employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse . they observed, hear about, or suspect to the administrator, or to an immediate supervisor who must immediately report it to the administrator .Upon learning of the report, the administrator .shall initiate an incident investigation .Injuries of Unknown Source .For resident injuries not involving an allegation of abuse or neglect, the administrator will appoint a person to gather further facts to make a determination as to whether the injury should be classified as an injury of unknown source. An injury should be classified as an injury of unknown source when both of the following conditions are met: The source of the injury was not observed by any person orther source of the injury could not be explained by the resident; and the injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury or the location of the injury .or the number of the injuries observed at one particular point in time .If classified as an injury of unknow source, the person gathering the facts will document the injury, the location and time it was observed, any treatment given and notification of the resident's physician, responsible party .
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely reporting of potential abuse and neglec...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely reporting of potential abuse and neglect allegations, including an injury of unknown origin for 2 (R1 and R4) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. Findings include: 1. R1's Face Sheet documented an initial admission date of 7/23/20 with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of prostate, unsteadiness of feet, lack of coordination, abnormalities of gait and mobility, adult failure to thrive, and cerebrovascular disease. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating R1 had moderate cognitive impairment. On 8/23/24 at 1:00 PM, R1's right great toenail was black with blood under the nail. R1's feet had greenish yellow bruising to the tops of both feet measuring approximately 3 inches x 3 inches. R1 said he did not know how his feet had been injured. R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 7/26/24 documented R1 did not have any bruising to the feet. R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 7/29/24 documented in part .Rt. (right) foot and leg was swollen and had bruises present, SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) reported no falls or injuries for (R1) . R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 8/2/24 documented in part . Lt (left) foot has a bruise on the top of foot size of a softball circle with purple/green in color. (Right) leg was swollen around ankle bone and had bruises present on top of the foot and side of ankle with purple/green bruise. SNF reported no falls or injuries . reported these findings to (V2 - Director of Nursing/DON). Pt (patient/R1) is unaware of how or when the bruise occurred . SN (Skilled Nurse) left a message with person answering (facility) work phone for Nurse on staff to give me a call, as SN needs a report of unknown bruise noted as staff nurses had not document [sic] on BLE (Bilateral Lower Extremities) having any bruise. (V7 - Registered Nurse/RN) on staff at SNF was not present during any SNV (Skilled Nurse Visit) and SN was unable to give (V7) report as no staff could find (V7) . R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 8/5/24 documented in part .Lt and Rt. feet bruises have improved no new bruises noted. SN spoke with (V13 - Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) and (V7) and stated SN needed a incident report since they have no report filled out stating that SNF staff has seen or document pt (R1) having bruises to BLE. Staff is supposed to write up a report stating that bruise are from unknown causes, both (V7) and (V13) voiced understanding . R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 8/9/24 documented in part .Lt and Rt. feet bruises have improved no new bruises noted. SN spoke with (V5/LPN) and (V2/DON). SN stated hospice needed a incident report since they have no report filled out stating that the SNF staff has seen or document (R1) having bruises to BLE. (sic) Staff was suppose to write up a report stating that bruise are from unknown causes, both (V7) and (V13) voiced understanding at last SNV and no report can be found or has been filled out per (V5) and (V2). (sic) Per (V2) a report will be filled out and SN can obtain a copy from them next week . R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 8/12/24 documented in part .Lt and Rt. feet bruises have improved no new bruises noted. SN spoke with (V3 - Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) SN stated hospice needed a incident report since they have no report filled out stating that the SNF staff has seen or document (R1) having bruises to BLE. Staff was suppose to write up a report stating that bruise are from unknown causes, report is filled out but is not signed by any of the nurses yet . R1's Hospice Visit Report dated 8/16/24 documented in part .SN received report from (V17- Hospice Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) that (R1) had bleeding to (right) great toe and bruising noted around toe nail bed. (R1's right) great toe has blood under toe nail bed . with bruising around nail bed noted. SN spoke with (V2) and (V3) and per them 'assessed toe d/t (due to) Hospice aide (V17/CNA) reported findings to (V2) and (V3)' . No reports noted of pt (patient) fall or injury noted per staff records. SN is still unable to get report from SNF of bruised [sic] noted on 8/2/24 as per (V2) and (V3) 'note is not signed yet' . R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 8/20/24 documented in part .brusied [sic] noted to Rt. great toe with dried blood under nail bed. SN reported SN findings to (V7/RN). SN still does not have report from 8/2/24 as it still not signed by RN .MD is aware of SN and CNA reporting SNF to (State Agency). On 8/23/24 at 10:59 AM, V4 (Hospice Registered Nurse/RN) said R1 had bruising found on 8/2/24 to the top of both feet about the size of a softball. V4 said she had reported the bruising to V2 (DON) when V4 found the bruising. V4 said on 8/5/24, V4 returned to the facility and V7 (RN) and V13 (LPN) said they were not aware of R1 having any injuries. V4 said on 8/9/24 she told V2 that V4 would need a report on the bruises because the staff could not tell V4 how R1 was injured and there was no documentation of the bruising in R1's medical record. V4 said that on 8/16/24, R1 was found to have bleeding and a hematoma under the right great toenail with surrounding bruising to the toe. V4 said the facility was not able to explain how R1's right great toe was injured. V4 said she had asked the facility several times for a report on R1's injuries of unknown origin but none had been provided. On 8/23/24 at 11:31 AM, V2 (DON) said V4 had reported to V2 that R1 had injuries to his feet but was not sure of the dates V4 had reported R1's injuries. V2 said she thought R1's injuries had been caused by staff hitting R1's feet on the bar of the mechanical lift. V2 said R1's injuries were not witnessed by any staff to V2's knowledge. V2 verified R1's injuries were injuries of unknown origin. V2 said any injury of unknown origin should be reported to V1 (Administrator). V2 said any injury of unknown origin should be reported to (State Agency). V2 said she was not sure why she did not report R1's injuries of unknown origin to V1. On 8/23/24 at 11:40 AM, V1 said the facility's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system would flag V1 when an incident was documented. V1 said R1 had an incident documented on 8/10/24 but was documented as injury of known origin. V1 said she had not been made aware of R1 having any injuries of unknown origin by staff. V1 said due to her not being aware of R1's injuries of unknown origin she had not reported them or started an investigation. On 8/23/24 at 2:00 PM, V13 (LPN) said he recalled the hospice nurse reporting something about R1's foot but was unsure what the hospice nurse had reported, or on what date. On 8/23/24 at 12:39 PM, V7 (RN) said the hospice nurse brought R1's bruising to her attention but was not sure of the date. V7 said R1 had bruising to the ankle and the tops of both feet. V7 said when she assessed R1, the bruising did not appear to be fresh due to the color. V7 said R1's bruising was not dark blue or purple, it was more of a greenish color. V7 said she did not report R1's injuries because V2 was aware of them. On 8/29/24 at 11:43 AM, V1 verified there was no skin assessment or progress note documenting R1's injuries on 8/10/24. V1 said V7 should have completed a skin assessment when V7 documented the incident in risk management. V1 said V13 should have completed a skin assessment when hospice notified him on 7/29/24. V1 said V2 should have completed a skin assessment when the hospice nurse notified her on 8/2/24. V1 said no skin assessments were completed for R1. R1's Report to (State Agency) dated 8/28/24 documented in part .Interviews with staff revealed that resident is tall, a maximum assist, dependent with care. Resident is transferred by 2 staff or at times has had to use a (mechanical lift). Staff stated (R1) has bumped feet on (mechanical lift) before. Staff interviews revealed that resident has been observed to also attempt to self transfer, pulls rolling wheelchair toward him . Interview with (R1) revealed that (R1) was unable to tell me what happened but he could tell me he was alright and having no pain in feet . 2. R4's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 1/21/24 with diagnoses that included cognitive communication deficit, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, and lack of coordination. R4's MDS dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of 2, indicating R4 was severely cognitively impaired. An undated and untitled abuse questionnaire signed by V18 (CNA) on 8/16/24 documented in part . Have you heard any resident say they have been abused? Yes . Do you know of any resident being abused? Yes . An undated and untitled abuse questionnaire signed by V20 (CNA) on 8/16/24 documented in part . Have you heard any resident say have been abused? Yes . Do you know of any resident being abused? Yes-ish . On 8/28/24 at 9:11 AM, V1 (Administrator) was asked why V18 (CNA) and V20 (CNA) had answered yes to the questions Have you heard any resident say they have been abused? and Do you know of any resident being abused? on R1's injury of unknown origin investigation packet, and V1 replied she was unsure because she found them the previous night. On 8/28/24 at 12:06 PM, V1 sent an email that documented in part .I just spoke with (V18) in person and (V20) by facetime. They answered yes because of an incident that occurred when they were working (specific hall). They reported to work at (6:00 AM) that day and noted that one of the residents was incontinent and appeared that (R4) may have been wet for some time. They felt like the midnight (CNA) did not change (R4) when needed . On 8/28/24 at 1:36 PM, V1 stated that on 8/16/24, V1 had sent V3 (ADON) to complete some staff abuse questionnaires. V18 and V20 reported the (R4) incident to V3 and V3 told V18 and V20 the incident with R4 was not what the abuse questionnaires were pertaining to. V1 stated that V3, V18, and V20 had not reported the incident regarding R4 to V1. V1 said she expected staff to immediately report any concerns with abuse or neglect to V1. V1 said she will be educating all staff on the definitions of abuse and reporting abuse. V1 said she would be starting an investigation immediately. On 8/28/24 at 1:08 PM, V18 (CNA) stated that on 8/16/24 when she arrived in the facility at 6:00 AM, R4 was found to be sitting in a recliner in the dining room. V18 said the recliner and R4's clothing was soaked in urine. V18 said R4's shirt was white and had brown lines of dried urine due to no one assisting R4 with incontinence care for a long time. V18 said she felt like this was possibly neglect and had reported it to the nurse working on 8/16/24. V18 said she could not recall who the nurse was she reported the incident to. V18 said she thought the nurse would report V18's concerns of neglect to management. V18 said she was aware R4 can be combative, but that was no reason to neglect someone. On 8/29/24 at 8:40 AM, V20 (CNA) stated that on 8/16/24 when she arrived at work at 6:00 AM, she found R4 to be sitting in the dining room in a recliner soaked in urine from mid-back to mid-thigh. V20 said R4 had a brown ring of dried urine on both her shirt and pants. V20 said she reported the incident to the nurse. V20 said later that day on 8/16/24 at approximately 4:30 PM, V3 (ADON) had given V20 an abuse questionnaire and V20 had reported the incident to V3. V20 said after reporting the incident to V3, V3 told V20 that was a hygiene problem, not abuse. V20 said she told V3 the incident was abuse because she felt R4 had been neglected. V20 said V3 did not say anything else and walked away. V20 said the night shift of 8/15/24 to 8/16/24 was staffed as usual with 1 licensed nurse and 2 CNA's. V20 said on multiple occasions she has arrived at work and had been told by V21 (CNA) that some residents were not up or had not been assisted with incontinence care because V21 says she is too old to do it. V20 said she has told V21 if V21 is too old to complete her job duties, V21 needs to find a different job that V21 can do. On 8/29/24 at 11:16 AM, V3 (ADON) stated that on 8/16/24, V1 had asked V3 to go around and ask staff members the questions on the abuse questionnaire. V3 said V18 and V20 had told her they had witnessed abuse but refused to elaborate any details. V3 said V18 and V20 told her V1 could come ask them for further details of their concerns. V3 said when she returned to V1's office, V1 was in a meeting and V3 had slid the abuse questionnaire papers under V1's door. On 8/29/24 at 11:43 AM, V1 said V3 did not slide the 8/16/24 abuse questionnaires under her office door. V1 said on 8/16/24 when V3 had completed the abuse questionnaires, V1 had already left the facility for the day. V1 stated that on 8/19/24, V1's office door was open and V1 was down the hall, and when V1 returned to her office, V3 had placed the abuse questionnaires on her desk. V1 said V3 never reported V18 and V20's abuse allegations. On 8/29/24 at 8:56 AM, V1 said she expected staff to report any concerns with abuse immediately to V1. The facility's revised 10/24/22 Abuse Prevention and Reporting - (State) policy documented in part .Employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse . they observed, hear about, or suspect to the administrator, or to an immediate supervisor who must immediately report it to the administrator . All residents, visitors, volunteers, family members or others are encouraged to report their concerns or suspected incidents of potential abuse . to the administrator or an immediate supervisor who must then immediately report it to the administrator . Reports should be documented and a record kept of the documentation . Any incident that does not involve abuse and does not result in serious bodily injury shall be reported within 24 hours . The nursing staff is additionally responsible for reporting on a facility incident report the appearance of suspicious bruises . as they occur. Upon report of such occurrences, the nursing supervisor is responsible for assessing the resident, reviewing the documentation and reporting to the administrator . Injuries of Unknown Source . For resident injuries not involving an allegation of abuse or neglect, the administrator will appoint a person to gather further facts to make a determination as to whether the injury should be classified as an injury of unknown source. An injury should be classified as an injury of unknown source when both of the following conditions are met: The source of the injury was not observed by any person other source of the injury could not be explained by the resident; and the injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury or the location of the injury . or the number of the injuries observed at one particular point in time . If classified as an injury of unknow source, . The (State Agency) will be notified. Time frames for reporting and investigation abuse will be followed .
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate and complete a timely and thorough investiga...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate and complete a timely and thorough investigation of an injury of unknown origin for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect investigations in the sample of 6. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet documented an initial admission date of 7/23/20 with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of prostate, unsteadiness of feet, lack of coordination, abnormalities of gait and mobility, adult failure to thrive, and cerebrovascular disease. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating R1 had moderate cognitive impairment. On 8/23/24 at 1:00 PM, R1's right great toenail was black with blood under the nail. R1's feet had greenish yellow bruising to the tops of both feet measuring approximately 3 inches x 3 inches. R1 said he did not know how his feet had been injured. R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 7/26/24 documented R1 did not have any bruising to the feet. R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 7/29/24 documented in part .Rt. (right) foot and leg was swollen and had bruises present, SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) reported no falls or injuries for (R1) . R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 8/2/24 documented in part . Lt (left) foot has a bruise on the top of foot size of a softball circle with purple/green in color. (Right) leg was swollen around ankle bone and had bruises present on top of the foot and side of ankle with purple/green bruise. SNF reported no falls or injuries . reported these findings to (V2 - Director of Nursing/DON). Pt (patient/R1) is unaware of how or when the bruise occurred . SN (Skilled Nurse) left a message with person answering (facility) work phone for Nurse on staff to give me a call, as SN needs a report of unknown bruise noted as staff nurses had not document on BLE (Bilateral Lower Extremities) having any bruise. (V7 - Registered Nurse/RN) on staff at SNF was not present during any SNV (Skilled Nurse Visit) and SN was unable to give (V7) report as no staff could find (V7) . R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 8/5/24 documented in part .Lt and Rt. feet bruises have improved no new bruises noted. SN spoke with (V13 - Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) and (V7) and stated SN needed a incident report since they have no report filled out stating that SNF staff has seen or document pt (R1) having bruises to BLE. Staff is supposed to write up a report stating that bruise are from unknown causes, both (V7) and (V13) voiced understanding . R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 8/9/24 documented in part .Lt and Rt. feet bruises have improved no new bruises noted. SN spoke with (V5/LPN) and (V2/DON). SN stated hospice needed a incident report since they have no report filled out stating that the SNF staff has seen or document (R1) having bruises to BLE. (sic) Staff was suppose to write up a report stating that bruise are from unknown causes, both (V7) and (V13) voiced understanding at last SNV and no report can be found or has been filled out per (V5) and (V2). (sic) Per (V2) a report will be filled out and SN can obtain a copy from them next week . R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 8/12/24 documented in part .Lt and Rt. feet bruises have improved no new bruises noted. SN spoke with (V3 - Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) SN stated hospice needed a incident report since they have no report filled out stating that the SNF staff has seen or document (R1) having bruises to BLE. Staff was suppose to write up a report stating that bruise are from unknown causes, report is filled out but is not signed by any of the nurses yet . R1's Hospice Visit Report dated 8/16/24 documented in part .SN received report from (V17- Hospice Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) that (R1) had bleeding to (right) great toe and bruising noted around toe nail bed. (R1's right) great toe has blood under toe nail bed . with bruising around nail bed noted. SN spoke with (V2) and (V3) and per them 'assessed toe d/t (due to) Hospice aide (V17/CNA) reported findings to (V2) and (V3)' . No reports noted of pt (patient) fall or injury noted per staff records. SN is still unable to get report from SNF of bruised noted on 8/2/24 as per (V2) and (V3) 'note is not signed yet' . R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 8/20/24 documented in part .brusied noted to Rt. great toe with dried blood under nail bed. SN reported SN findings to (V7/RN). SN still does not have report from 8/2/24 as it still not signed by RN .MD is aware of SN and CNA reporting SNF to (State Agency). R1's Report to (State Agency) dated 8/28/24 documented in part .Interviews with staff revealed that resident is tall, a maximum assist, dependent with care. Resident is transferred by 2 staff or at times has had to use a (mechanical lift). Staff stated (R1) has bumped feet on (mechanical lift) before. Staff interviews revealed that resident has been observed to also attempt to self transfer, pulls rolling wheelchair toward him . Interview with (R1) revealed that (R1) was unable to tell me what happened but he could tell me he was alright and having no pain in feet . On 8/23/24 at 10:59 AM, V4 (Hospice RN) said R1 had bruising found on 8/2/24 to the top of both feet about the size of a softball. V4 said she had reported the bruising to V2 (DON) when V4 found the bruising. V4 said that on 8/5/24, V4 returned to the facility and V7 (RN) and V13 (LPN) said they were not aware of R1 having any injuries. V4 said that on 8/9/24, she told V2 that V4 would need a report on the bruises because the staff could not tell V4 how R1 was injured and there was no documentation of the bruising in R1's medical record. V4 said that on 8/16/24, R1 was found to have bleeding and a hematoma under the right great toenail with surrounding bruising to the toe. V4 said the facility was not able to explain how R1's right great toe was injured. V4 said she had asked the facility several times for a report on R1's injuries of unknown origin but none had been provided. On 8/23/24 at 12:39 PM, V7 (RN) said the hospice nurse brought R1's bruising to her attention but was not sure of the date. V7 said R1 had bruising to the ankle and the tops of both feet. V7 said when she assessed R1, the bruising did not appear to be fresh due to the color. V7 said R1's bruising was not dark blue or purple, it was more of a greenish color. V7 said she did not report R1's injuries because V2 was aware of them. On 8/23/24 at 11:31 AM, V2 (DON) said V4 had reported R1's bruising to her but was unsure of the date. V2 said she thought V4 may have reported R1's bruising on 8/13/24. V2 said she thought R1 had probably hit his feet on the mechanical lift during a transfer. V2 said she was not sure when R1's injuries had appeared. V2 said there was an incident in risk management (a tracking system for any incidents in the facility) on 8/10/24 by V7 noting bruising to R1's feet and was documented as a known injury. V2 verified R1's injuries were of unknown origin. V2 said any injury of unknown origin should be reported to V1 (Administrator) so an investigation can be started. V2 said she was not sure why she did not report R1's injuries of unknown origin to V1. On 8/23/24 at 11:40 AM, V1 said V2 had told her something about R1 having a small cut or something on his toe possibly on 8/10/24. V1 said there was an incident documented in risk management on 8/10/24 by V7 documenting a known injury to R1's foot. V1 said she had not been made aware R1 had any injuries of unknown origin to open an investigation on. V1 said she had not started an investigation on R1's injuries but had asked residents and staff if they had witnessed abuse on 8/16/24. On 8/29/24 at 11:43 AM, V1 verified there was no skin assessment or progress note documenting R1's injuries on 8/10/24. V1 said V7 should have completed a skin assessment when V7 documented the incident in risk management. V1 said V13 should have completed a skin assessment when hospice notified him on 7/29/24. V1 said V2 should have completed a skin assessment when the hospice nurse notified her on 8/2/24. V1 said no skin assessments were completed for R1. On 8/29/24 at 11:16 AM, V3 (ADON) said if V1 was not in the facility to begin an investigation when any allegation of abuse was made, V2 would be next in the chain of command to start an investigation. V3 said V1 would be notified but it would be V2's responsibility to begin an investigation. On 8/29/24 at 11:43 AM, V1 said V2 is the second in the chain of command. V1 said V2 can start an investigation and has access to the portal to complete and send an initial report. On 8/29/24 at 8:56 AM, V1 said she expected any staff to immediately report any injury on unknown origin to V1. The facility's revised 10/24/22 Abuse Prevention and Reporting - (State) policy documented in part .Employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse . they observed, hear about, or suspect to the administrator, or to an immediate supervisor who must immediately report it to the administrator . All residents, visitors, volunteers, family members or others are encouraged to report their concerns or suspected incidents of potential abuse . to the administrator or an immediate supervisor who must then immediately report it to the administrator . Reports should be documented and a record kept of the documentation . Upon learning of the report, the administrator . shall initiate an incident investigation . Injuries of Unknown Source . For resident injuries not involving an allegation of abuse or neglect, the administrator will appoint a person to gather further facts to make a determination as to whether the injury should be classified as an injury of unknown source. An injury should be classified as an injury of unknown source when both of the following conditions are met: The source of the injury was not observed by any person other source of the injury could not be explained by the resident; and the injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury or the location of the injury . or the number of the injuries observed at one particular point in time . If classified as an injury of unknow source, the person gathering the facts will document the injury, the location and time it was observed, any treatment given and notification of the resident's physician, responsible party . Time frames for reporting and investigating will be followed. The appointed investigator will, at a minimum, attempt to interview the person who reported the incident, anyone likely to have direct knowledge of the incident and the resident, if interviewable. Any written statements that have been submitted will be reviewed, along with any pertinent medical records or other documents .
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care to 2 (R1 and R4) of 3 residents re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care to 2 (R1 and R4) of 3 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care in the sample of 6. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet documented an initial admission date of 7/23/20 with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of prostate, unsteadiness of feet, lack of coordination, abnormalities of gait and mobility, adult failure to thrive, cerebrovascular disease. R1's 8/6/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating R1 had moderate cognitive impairment. R1's Order Summary Sheet printed 8/26/24 documented a 7/16/24 order admit to (Hospice Company) for end of life. On 8/23/24 at 10:59 AM, V4 (Hospice Registered Nurse/RN) stated that on one occasion, she had found R1's urinary catheter to be leaking. V4 said R1's bed was saturated with urine, with a brown ring around it. V4 said R1 had to be wet for a long time to form a brown ring. On 8/28/24 at 2:23 PM, V17 (Hospice Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) said on one occasion, she had found R1 lying in bed soiled with dried feces and brown rings on the incontinence pads. V17 said she showed this to a (facility) nurse and told them this was unacceptable. V17 said she had spoken with V19 (Certified Nursing Assistant/ CNA) and was told V19 had not been in to care for R1 in a long time. V17 said on another occasion R1 was found lying in bed with R1's pants soiled with dried feces on them around his ankles. V17 said she had told V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) and V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) this was unacceptable. V17 said she felt like the facility was not taking care of R1 and hospice was making extra visits to make sure R1 was getting cared for. On 8/23/24 at 12:30 PM, V8 (CNA) said the facility was short staffed regularly. V8 said when the facility is short staffed it was hard to get all the tasks completed. R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 8/12/24 documented in part .SN (Skilled Nurse) assessed pt (patient/R1) bed as it was soaked in urine SN found a CNA and had her obtained new set of sheets, upon further looking SN noted seen sediment into urine, slime mucous attached to in between pt legs with catheter leaking . R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 8/16/24 documented in part . Upon arrival, pt. (R1) was lying in bed, resting, he was up to getting a bath .noted that his pants were still on, with a soiled dry BM (Bowel Movement), noted that the area on scrotum was red as well as the area on his left upper buttocks .did talk to (V2) . and (V3), at facility about pt's (R1) condition . 2. R4's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 1/21/24 with diagnoses that included cognitive communication deficit, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, lack of coordination. R4's MDS dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of 2, indicating R4 was severely cognitively impaired. On 8/28/24 at 1:08 PM, V18 (CNA) said that on 8/16/24 when she arrived in the facility at 6:00 AM, R4 was found to be sitting in a recliner in the dining room. V18 said the recliner and R4's clothing was soaked in urine. V18 said R4's shirt was white and had brown lines of dried urine due to no one assisting R4 with incontinence care for a long time. V18 said she felt like this was possibly neglect and had reported it to the nurse working on 8/16/24. V18 said she could not recall who the nurse was she reported the incident to. V18 said she thought the nurse would report V18's concerns for neglect to management. V18 said she was aware that R4 can be combative but that was no reason to neglect someone. On 8/29/24 at 8:40 AM, V20 (CNA) said that on 8/16/24 when she arrived at work at 6:00 AM she found R4 to be sitting in the dining room in a recliner soaked in urine from mid-back to mid-thigh. V20 said R4 had a brown ring of dried urine on both her shirt and pants. V20 said she reported the incident to the nurse. V20 said later that day on 8/16/24 at approximately 4:30 PM, V3 (ADON) had given V20 an abuse questionnaire and V20 had reported the incident to V3. V20 said after reporting the incident to V3, V3 told V20 that was a hygiene problem, not abuse. V20 said she told V3 the incident was abuse because she felt R4 had been neglected. V20 said V3 did not say anything else and walked away. V20 said the night shift of 8/15/24 to 8/16/24 was staffed as usual with 1 licensed nurse and 2 CNA's. V20 said on multiple occasions she has arrived at work and been told by V21 (CNA) that some residents were not up or had not been assisted with incontinence care because V21 says she is too old to do it. V20 said she has told V21 if V21 is too old to complete her job duties, V21 needs to find a different job that V21 can do. On 8/29/24 at 11:16 AM, V3 (ADON) said she expected all residents to be assisted with incontinence care in a timely fashion.
Jun 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided timely for three...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided timely for three residents (R1, R2, and R6) of 9 residents reviewed for incontinence care in the sample of 9. Findings Include: 1.R1's Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/17/24 documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include diarrhea, hypertension, clostridium difficile, flaccid neuropathic bladder, and morbid obesity. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 14, which indicates R1 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R1 is dependent on staff for toilet transfers, is occasionally incontinent of urine, and frequently incontinent of bowel. R1's current Care Plan does not document a focus area for incontinence care/toileting. On 6/17/24 at 2:52 PM, V4 (Care Plan/MDS Coordinator) stated he just missed it when he did R1's care plan. On 6/17/24 at 10:50 AM, R1 stated that recently, he was stuck on the bed pan for over two hours waiting for them to assist him. R1 stated he called, and it rang for over 100 minutes per his phone screen. R1 stated then he called the local police station to see if they could get in touch with anyone at the facility. R1 stated after the third call to the police they were able to get in touch with someone from administration. R1 stated he has had bowel surgery and can't say that it would make a difference if they got to him quicker after the incontinence episodes, but he has laid for up to two hours. On 6/17/24 at 2:57 PM, V16 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) exited R1's room with dirty linens, V16 (CNA) and V18 (CNA) returned to R1's room to provide incontinence care. R1 was assisted to roll to his side. R1's buttocks were red and excoriated. V18 stated when they removed his bed pan, they took the bed pad that was under him, and it had a brown ring of urine on it. This indicates R1 had not been checked or changed for a long period of time. R1 stated no one had been in his room to provide care since this surveyor had been in there at 10:50 AM. This indicates no incontinence care was provided from 10:50 AM until 2:57 PM. 2. R2's Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/17/24 documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include heart failure, morbid obesity, acute kidney failure, cerebral palsy, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and scoliosis. R2's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 14, which indicates R2 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R2 is dependent on staff for toileting and is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R2's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of I have an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care/mobility performance (functional abilities) deficit that may fluctuate with activity throughout the day r/t (related to) Disease Process (CP/cerebral palsy), Limited Mobility. This Focus area includes the intervention, Toilet hygiene- My usual performance is dependent. On 6/17/24 at 11:04 AM, R2 stated it takes a little while for staff to answer his call light. R2 stated they need more help here; they don't have enough CNA's. R2 stated sometimes it takes longer than 20 minutes. When asked if he had ever had to lay in urine/feces due to it taking loner, R2 stated not because he had to wait but just because he urinates a lot. 3. R6's Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/17/24 documents R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include abnormal posture, chronic kidney disease, mild intellectual disability, diabetes, and schizoaffective disorder. R6's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 12, which indicates a moderate cognitive deficit. This same MDS documents R6 requires substantial/maximal assistance with toileting and is occasionally incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel. R6's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of, I have an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t Mild intellectual disabilities and lack of coordination. This Focus area includes the intervention, Toilet Use: (R6) requires extensive assistance by 2 staff with toileting at all times. On 6/17/24 at 1:32 PM, V15 (CNA) stated she had worked with three CNA's on night shift (6 PM to 6 AM). When asked if she was able to do bed checks every two hours, V15 stated she thought they did them every three hours. On 6/17/24 at 12:16 AM, V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated she works 6 PM to 6 AM and the normal staffing is two nurses and two CNA's per side (total of four CNA's). V8 stated she has worked with less than that but not recently. V8 stated the 6 PM to 10 PM time frame is difficult with two CNA's on one side. V8 stated they probably don't provide every two-hour incontinence care during that time frame. On 6/16/24 at 11:08 PM, V5 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated he works night shift 6 PM to 6 AM. V5 stated the normal staffing each night shift, is two nurses and four certified nursing assistants (CNA's). V5 stated two CNAs on each side is the minimum staffing to be able to meet the resident needs. V5 stated he had worked with just three CNA's but not for 3-4 weeks. V5 stated all the care was provided but it was slow. On 6/17/24 at 1:45 PM, V16 (CNA) stated they were currently working with five trained CNA's and one trainee. V16 stated that isn't enough to meet the needs of the residents. V16 stated showers don't always get done. When asked if call lights were answered timely, V16 stated, Probably not. When asked if there was a negative impact related to working with less staff, V16 stated being short-staffed effects everything. When asked if incontinence care was provided timely, V16 stated when she is there, she gets it done. When asked if she had any residents complain they weren't provided timely incontinence care, V16 stated R1 and R6. When asked if she had ever seen anyone who appeared like they had been laying in urine/feces for a long period of time, V16 stated at shift change and identified R6 as one of the residents. On 6/20/24 at 12:31 PM, V2 (Director of Nurses/DON) stated she would expect bed checks to be done every two hours and incontinence care provided as needed. On 6/17/24 at 3:59 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated he hadn't had any concerns related to incontinence care being provided timely, call lights answered timely, and/or residents left in feces/urine for long periods of time. V1 stated he would say three CNA's wouldn't be able to do it, but they also have administration staff stay or come in and assist. The facility Incontinence Care policy dated 4/20/21 documents, Purpose: to prevent excoriation and skin breakdown, discomfort and maintain dignity. Guidelines: Incontinent resident will be checked periodically in accordance with the assessed incontinence episodes or approximately every two hours and provided perineal and genital care after each episode .
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide enough staff to meet residents' needs and provide timely as...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide enough staff to meet residents' needs and provide timely assistance with care. This failure has the potential to affect all 59 residents currently residing at the facility. Findings Include: The facility Midnight Census Report dated 6/16/24 documents 59 residents currently reside at the facility. 1. R1's Transfer/Discharge Report dated 6/17/24 documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include diarrhea, hypertension, clostridium difficile, flaccid neuropathic bladder, and morbid obesity. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicates R1 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R1 is dependent on staff for toilet transfers, is occasionally incontinent of urine, and frequently incontinent of bowel. R1's current Care Plan does not document a focus area for incontinence care/toileting. On 6/17/24 at 2:52 PM, V4 (Care Plan/MDS Coordinator) stated he just missed it when he did R1's care plan. On 6/17/24 at 10:50 AM, R1 stated his call light hadn't been working so they gave him a different kind of call light that beeps at the nurse's station. R1 stated if the button gets turned off on his call light, he just calls the nurse's station. R1 stated sometimes at night the call light doesn't get answered and they don't answer the phone. R1 stated the time it takes them to answer, varies. R1 stated when they are short staffed it can take forever. R1 stated he has told the CNA's and the nurse's but hadn't talked to administration about it. R1 stated he was stuck on the bed pan for over two hours waiting for them to assist him recently. R1 stated he called, and it rang for over 100 minutes per his phone screen. R1 stated then he called the local police station to see if they could get in touch with anyone at the facility. R1 stated after the third call to the police they were able to get in touch with someone from administration. R1 stated he has had bowel surgery and can't say it would make a difference if they got to him quicker after the incontinence episodes, but he has laid for up to two hours. On 6/17/24 at 2:57 PM, V16 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) exited R1's room with dirty linens, V16 (CNA) and V18 (CNA) returned to R1's room to provide incontinence care. R1 was assisted to roll to his side. R1's buttocks were red and excoriated. V18 stated when they removed his bed pan, they took the bed pad that was under him, and it had a brown ring of urine on it. This indicates R1 had not been checked or changed for a long period of time. R1 stated no one had been in his room to provide care since this surveyor had been in there at 10:50 AM. This indicates no incontinence care was provided from 10:50 AM until 2:57 PM. 2. R2's Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/17/24 documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include heart failure, morbid obesity, acute kidney failure, cerebral palsy, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and scoliosis. R2's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 14, which indicates R2 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R2 is dependent on staff for toileting and is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R2's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of I have an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care/mobility performance (functional abilities) deficit that may fluctuate with activity throughout the day r/t (related to) Disease Process (CP/cerebral palsy), Limited Mobility. This Focus area includes the intervention, Toilet hygiene- My usual performance is dependent. On 6/17/24 at 11:04 AM, R2 stated it takes a little while for staff to answer his call light. R2 stated they need more help here; they don't have enough CNA's. R2 stated sometimes it takes longer than 20 minutes. When asked if he had ever had to lay in urine/feces due to it taking loner, R2 stated not because he had to wait but just because he urinates a lot. 3. R5's Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/17/24 documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include heart disease, chronic fatigue, hypertension, heart failure, unsteadiness on feet, and diabetes. R5's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 15, which indicates R5 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R5 is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R5's current Care Plan does not include a Focus area for incontinence care. On 6/17/24 at 9:59 AM, R5 stated it can take more than 30 minutes for the staff to answer the call lights. R5 stated it happens at all times of the day because they don't have enough staff. R5 stated they try but they just don't have enough staff. 4. R6's Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/17/24 documents R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include abnormal posture, chronic kidney disease, mild intellectual disability, diabetes, and schizoaffective disorder. R6's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 12, which indicates a moderate cognitive deficit. This same MDS documents R6 requires substantial/maximal assistance with toileting and is occasionally incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel. R6's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of, I have an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t Mild intellectual disabilities and lack of coordination. This Focus area includes the intervention, Toilet Use: (R6) requires extensive assistance by 2 staff with toileting at all times. On 6/16/24 at 11:08 PM, V5 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated he works night shift 6 PM to 6 AM. V5 stated the normal staffing each night shift, is two nurses and four certified nursing assistants (CNA's). V5 stated two CNAs on each side is the minimum staffing to be able to meet the resident needs. V5 stated he had worked with just three CNA's but not for 3-4 weeks. V5 stated all the care was provided but it was slow. On 6/17/24 at 12:11 PM, V6 (CNA) stated she works from 6 PM to 6 AM. V6 stated they have two CNA's on each side on night shift, a total of four CNA's per 12-hour shift. V6 stated there were times they only had three CNA's working and when that happened, she was able to provide the care needed but call lights weren't answered timely. On 6/17/24 at 12:14 AM, V7 (CNA) stated she normally works from 6 AM to 6 PM. V7 stated they have two CNA's on each side on that shift as well. V7 stated it isn't enough to meet the needs of the residents. V7 stated showers don't get done and call lights aren't answered timely. On 6/17/24 at 12:16 AM, V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated she works 6 PM to 6 AM and the normal staffing is two nurses and two CNA's per side (total of four CNA's). V8 stated she has worked with less than that but not recently. V8 stated the 6 PM to 10 PM time frame is difficult with two CNA's. V8 stated they probably don't provide every two-hour incontinence care during that time frame. On 6/17/24 at 12:22 AM, V9 (CNA) stated two CNA's on the Alzheimer's unit is enough with the residents they currently have. V9 stated she has worked by herself on that unit, and she wasn't able to meet the needs of the residents. On 6/17/24 at 1:32 PM, V15 (CNA) stated she had worked with three CNA's on night shift (6 PM to 6 AM). When asked if she was able to do bed checks every two hours, V15 stated she thought they did them every three hours. On 6/17/24 at 1:45 PM, V16 (CNA) stated they were currently working with five trained CNA's and one trainee. V16 stated that isn't enough to meet the needs of the residents. V16 stated showers don't always get done. When asked if call lights were answered timely, V16 stated, Probably not. When asked if there was a negative impact related to working with less staff, V16 stated being short-staffed effects everything. When asked if incontinence care was provided timely, V16 stated when she is there, she gets it done. When asked if she had any residents complain they weren't provided timely incontinence care, V16 stated R1 and R6. When asked if she had ever seen anyone who appeared like they had been laying in urine/feces for a long period of time, V16 stated at shift change and identified R6 as one of the residents. On 6/17/24 at 1:54 PM, V17 (CNA) stated they have five CNA's and a trainee working. V17 stated two on the Alzheimer's unit is pretty good but two on the other units is a little rough. V17 stated they try to do the best they can. V17 stated it is sometimes hard to get showers and the little extra things done. The facility Daily Staffing Sheet dated 6/12/24 documents two CNA's worked from 6 PM to 8 PM and three CNA's from 8 PM to 6 AM. The untitled, handwritten, undated sheet provided to this surveyor documents V2 (Director of Nurses/DON) stayed at the facility until 9:45 PM and V3 (Assistant Director of Nurses/ADON) stayed at the facility until 9:30 PM. This leaves three CNA's with no administrative assistance from 9:45 AM until 6:00 AM. his facility Daily Staffing Sheet dated 6/13/24 documents three CNA's in the facility from 6 PM to 6 AM and four CNA's from 10:50 PM to 2:50 AM. The untitled, undated handwritten sheet with V2 and V3's extra hours documents V2 stayed at the facility until 6:00 PM, and V3 stayed until 8:00 PM. This leaves three CNA's with no administrative assistance from 8:00 PM until 10:50 PM, and from 2:50 AM until 6:00 AM. On 6/17/24 at 3:22 PM, V2 (DON) stated she has not had any complaints/concerns brought to her related to call lights being answered timely and/or incontinence care being provided timely. V2 stated they try to have five CNA's on day shift- two in the back (Alzheimer's unit) and three in the front. V2 stated that is enough staff to meet the needs of the residents. This surveyor reviewed the schedule with V2 and asked about the days there were only two or three CNA's on the schedule for night shift, V2 stated V3 (ADON) is the one who does the schedules so she would have to check with her. On 6/17/24 at 3:30 PM, after reviewing the CNA schedule with V3 (ADON), she stated she stays late on Friday nights and does rounds with the wound specialist, so she is at the facility on those nights to assist the CNA's. When asked if she stayed after midnight since there were only two or three CNA's working during that time frame, V3 stated she would have to get the times she and V2 worked for this surveyor. V3 stated she always writes her times down since she doesn't clock in/out. The untitled undated handwritten document that was provided documents V2 (DON) and V3 (ADON) stayed until 3:00 AM on 6/16/24. This same document notes V2 and V3 left the facility between 6:00 and 9:45 PM on 6/10, 6/11, 6/12, 6/13, and 6/14 and didn't stay late on 6/15/24. On 6/17/24 at 3:59 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated he hadn't had any concerns related to incontinence care being provided timely, call lights answered timely, and/or residents left in feces/urine for long periods of time. V1 stated he would say three CNA's wouldn't be able to do it, but they also have administration staff stay or come in and assist.
May 2024 9 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 5. R45's Transfer/Discharge Report dated 5/22/24 documents an admission date of 04/16/21 with diagnoses in part of Cognitive Com...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 5. R45's Transfer/Discharge Report dated 5/22/24 documents an admission date of 04/16/21 with diagnoses in part of Cognitive Communication Deficit, Dysphagia, Alzheimer's Disease, Lack of Coordination and Contracture of left hand. R45's MDS dated [DATE] documents in Section C a BIMS score of 0, indicating R45 was unable to complete the BIMS. Staff assessment for mental status was completed and documents short term memory problems and long-term memory problems with moderately impaired decision making, which indicates that R45 makes poor decisions. Section GG documents R45 requires supervision or touching assistance with eating. R45's Care Plan undated, documents an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care/mobility performance (functional abilities) deficit that may fluctuate with activity throughout the day r/t (related to) Alzheimer's disease process. Interventions for eating include in part, R45's usual performance is substantial or maximal assistance. R45 is able to consume regular consistency foods .provide diet as ordered R45's Physician Orders document an order dated 11/29/23 of nutritional ice cream supplement with lunch and dinner and resident (R45) to have house stock nutritional supplement TID (Three times a day) with meals. An order dated 1/28 24 documents general diet mechanical soft texture, regular consistency, nutritional supplement TID (3 times daily), and nutritional ice cream at lunch and supper. On 05/20/24 at 1:15PM, R45 was served a mechanical soft tray with no nutritional supplement shake or ice cream. On 05/21/24 at 12:20PM, R45 was served a mechanical soft tray with no nutritional supplement shake or ice cream. On 05/22/24 at 12:20PM, R45 was served a mechanical soft tray with no nutritional supplement shake or ice cream. On 05/29/24 at 11:10 AM, V29 (Registered Dietician) stated, she would expect all supplements and fortified foods that were ordered to be served as ordered. The dietary policy dated 2020 titled, Fortified Food, Supplements, and Snacks documents: Residents who cannot consume adequate amounts of regular foods at meals to meet their nutritional needs may be considered for Fortified Foods, snacks or supplements in order to increase nutritional intake. Commercially prepared supplements and nutritional interventions may be ordered by the food service manager, dietician, or nursing staff. Fortified foods, house supplements, or snacks will be provided within the specifications of the diet order and may be substituted with nutritionally equivalent interventions if a specific brand or type of supplement in unavailable. The facility policy titled, weights dated 10/17/19 documents: 3. Re-weight should be obtained if there is a difference of 5# (pounds) or greater (loss or gain) since previously recorded weight. 4. Re-weight should be taken as soon as possible after an unanticipated weight change is noted and prior to calling the physician. (Usually within 72 hours). 5. Efforts should be made to obtain all weights and re-weights by the 10th of each month. 6. Undesired or unanticipated weight gains/loss of 5% in 30 day, 7.5% in three months, or 10% in six months shall be reported to the physician, dietician and/or dietary manager as appropriate. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide additional nourishment as ordered in the form of nutritional supplements and fortified foods for five (R50, R31, R36, R44, and R45) of 12 residents reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 38. This failure resulted in R50 experiencing a significant weight loss of 17.5% in 3 months, and R31 experiencing a significant weight loss of 6.68% in 1 month or 8.58% in 3 months. Findings Include: 1. R50's Transfer/Discharge report documents an admission date of 01/26/24 with diagnoses including: Alcohol abuse with alcohol induced mood disorder, Alcohol Dependence with alcohol induced persisting dementia, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Unspecified Dementia, Wernicke's Encephalopathy, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Mood Affective Disorder. R50's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R50's MDS section GG documents eating ability as: supervision or touching assistance - helper provides verbal cues and or touching/steading and/or contact guard assistance as resident completes activity. Assistance may be provided throughout the activity or intermittently. R50's Order Summary Report documents orders including: general diet: Regular texture, regular consistency, fortified foods with meals, ice cream with lunch and supper with a start date of 01/26/24, no end date documented; and house nutrition supplement - three times a day in between meals with a start date of 05/16/24 and no end date listed. R50's Care Plan documents a Focus Area dated 03/05/24 documenting: R50 has a nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem regarding the diagnosis of Dementia, Wernicke's Encephalopathy, COPD, and Mood Affective Disorder. R50's care plan documents interventions of: Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/Document for side effects and effectiveness, Encourage PO (by mouth) intake of meals and snacks, Invite the resident to activities that promote additional intake, Obtain and monitor lab/diagnostic work as ordered. Report results to MD (Medical Doctor) and follow up as indicated, provide, serve diet as ordered. Monitor intake and record with meal, and RD (Registered Dietician) to evaluate and make diet change recommendations PRN (as needed), all interventions are dated 03/05/24. R50's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documents weights as: 162.8 pounds (lbs.) on 01/26/2024, 161.4 lbs. on 02/07/2024, 161.0 lbs. on 3/18/2024, 139.5 lbs. on 4/9/2024, and 133.0 lbs. (pounds) on 5/15/2024. The weights documented indicate a 17.6 % weight loss in 3 months. On 05/20/24 at 11:00 AM, V22 (Cook) made mashed potatoes with creamy classic mashed potatoes and hot water. No fortified potatoes were observed to be prepared. The recipe titled power potatoes documents ingredients: milk 2%, milk non fat dry, potato, mashed instant, sour cream, margarine, and salt. On 05/20/24 at approximately 12:00 PM during lunch service, there was only one pan of mashed potatoes on the steamtable. Regardless if dietary cards listed fortified potatoes, the creamy classic mashed potatoes were observed to be served to all residents. On 05/20/24 at 12:40 PM, R50 did not receive fortified potatoes or ice cream with his lunch tray. On 05/20/24 at 1:30 PM V16 (Dietary Manager) stated the nutritional supplements came in on the truck that morning and they are frozen, they will have to give them out at snack time. On 05/20/24 at 2:00 PM, V22 (Cook) stated that the mashed potatoes that were made for lunch were made with the potato flakes and hot water, and they were the only potatoes made and served that day. On 05/20/24 at 2:40 PM, V28 (Activity Aide/Certified Nurse Aide/CNA) passed afternoon snacks. On this date between 2:30 - 3:15 PM, R50 did not receive the ice cream during snack time. On 05/21/24 at 12:40 PM, R50 did not receive ice cream with his lunch tray. .At 2:35 PM, R50 did not receive ice cream during snack time. On 05/22/24 at 1:00 PM, R50 did not receive ice cream with his lunch tray. On 05/22/24 at 1:25 PM, R50 had eaten all of the food on his plate and R50 started reaching out for other residents' food. V28 (Activity Aide/CNA) was assisting R28 with her lunch. V28 attempted redirecting R50 and telling him it was not his food. After several attempts at redirecting and R50 starting to get aggressive, V28 asked R50 if he was still hungry and R50 answered yes. V28 went to the snack room and placed some cheese puffs onto a small plate and brought them back for R50. On 05/22/24, R50 did not receive ice cream during snack time. On 05/29/24 at 11:10 AM, V29 (Registered Dietician) stated she was aware of R50's weight loss between March and April and on 04/26/24 she noted she had requested a re-weigh for R50. V29 stated, in her note from 05/16/24, May's weight was consistent with April's weight and she ordered the supplements for R50. 2. R31's Face Sheet documents an admission date of 07/23/20 with diagnoses in part of Heart Failure, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Malignant Neoplasm of Prostate, Hypertension, and Hyperlipidemia. R31's MDS dated [DATE] documents in Section C a BIMS score of 12, which indicates moderate cognitive impairment. Section GG documents that R31 requires set-up and clean-up assistance with eating. R31's Care Plan dated 05/02/24 documents R31 has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care/mobility performance (functional abilities) deficit that may fluctuate with activity throughout the day r/t (related to) a diagnosis of CHF (Congestive Heart Failure), DM (Diabetes Mellitus), AFIB (Atrial Fibrillation), MDD (Major Depression Disorder) and HTN (Hypertension) with interventions in part of Eating- My usual performance is set-up. Risk for Depression/Decreased appetite. R31 able to consume regular consistency food with interventions of Monitor and record intake q (Every) shift, monitor for sign/symptoms of aspiration, monitor weight as indicated monthly and PRN (as needed), position for eating and drinking safely, provide diet as ordered, regular diet with super cereal, nutritional shakes with meals as desired, and refer to ST (Speech Therapy) R31's Weight summary in part documents the following weights: 12/21/23 - 200 lbs., 01/17/24 -197.5 lbs., 02/17/24 - 197 lbs., 3/18/24 - 196 lbs., 4/18/24 - 193 lbs., and 05/20/24 180.1 lbs. R31 has had a 6.68% weight loss in 1 month from April to May and 8.58% weight loss in 3 months from February to May. R31's Physician Order documents general diet, regular texture, thin consistency, house nutritional supplement with meals ordered 01/04/24. R31's Nutritional Progress note dated 04/28/24 documents RD (Registered Dietitian) consult for -5.0% change (Comparison Weight 03/30/2024, 195.4 Lbs., -5.1%, -9.9 Lbs. April. Wt. (weight) 186# BMI (Body Mass Index) 34.2 overweight per standards. On 05/20/24 at 11:30 AM, R31 was sitting in the Dining Room in his wheelchair falling asleep at the lunch table. At 12:30 PM, R31 was still sleeping at the lunch table, still waiting on a lunch tray. At 12:33 PM, R31 was taken out of the dining room and placed in the hallway with no tray served to him. At 1:52 PM, R31 was placed in his recliner in his room. At 1:58 PM, V7 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) was asked if R31 had received a lunch tray yet. V7 stated that she was unsure if R31 had eaten yet. At 1:59 PM, V7 looked on the hall tray cart and was unable to find a tray with R31's kitchen card on it. At 2:00 PM, V7 went to the kitchen and asked kitchen staff about R31's lunch tray. V7 stated that the kitchen staff told her they had lost R31's lunch ticket and that they did finally find it. At 2:05 PM, V7 went to R31's room to ask R31 what he would like to eat and R31 stated he would like some soup and crackers with a drink. At 2:15 PM, R31 was served a lunch tray by V7. R31's Order Summary dated 05/21/24 documents send to local hospital emergency room r/t (related to) decline in condition no appetite and lethargy. R31's Progress note dated 05/21/24 at 5:02 PM documents in part, Patient (R31) is going to be admitted to local hospital with dx (diagnosis) of hyponatremia, hypercalcemia and AKI (Acute Kidney Infection). On 05/28/24 at 11:00 AM, V16 (Dietary Manager) stated that she found out last week that the program she uses to print meal tickets wasn't printing off all the meal tickets. V16 said some of the residents' meal tickets were missing. V16 stated that this is the main way they serve residents their meals, by the meal tickets, so if one was missing, they didn't know to serve that resident. V16 said that when she found out the program wasn't printing all of the resident meal tickets, she started to double check to make sure they were all there. V16 said that she must go in and manually print just one or two resident tickets sometimes on her own if they didn't print up with all the other residents' meal tickets. V16 stated sometimes residents can also get missed during mealtimes if a meal ticket gets stuck together. V16 said that she is working on trying to get a better system going so they don't miss any meal tickets or residents' trays. V16 said she wasn't aware of residents missing nutritional supplements last week. V16 said they were very short last week and that could be the reason many of the supplements were forgotten. V16 said that usually the supplements, such as the nutritional shakes and nutritional supplement ice cream comes out of the kitchen served on the tray and the person serving should double check the ticket to make sure that it is correct. V16 said they didn't have a lot of staff last week, she even had to work in the kitchen on 05/23/24 because she was short staffed. V16 stated that she knows that R31 is on a nutritional supplement and doesn't know why he didn't get the supplement or why they forgot his tray. On 05/28/24 at 11:54 AM, V29 (Registered Dietitian) stated she was not aware that R31 was not served a tray on 05/20/24 until staff had to ask for one. V29 stated that she was not aware of V16 having trouble with not being able to print all the residents' meal tickets out and that some of the residents' tickets would be missing and they may not be served a tray. V29 stated R31 was to receive a nutritional supplement with meals related to him having a weight loss. V29 said R31 would take the supplement sometimes, but other times he would refuse them. V29 said R31 was on comfort care and that they offer R31 supplements as he desires. V29 said she knew R31 has recently had a 5% weight loss in a month. V29 stated she was going to work with the kitchen to help straighten out some of the problems that they had going on with residents not receiving all the supplements that are ordered for them and making sure all residents get their meals. 3. R36's Transfer/Discharge Report documents an admission date of 10/04/19 with diagnoses including: Schizoaffective Disorder, Dementia, and Major Depressive Disorder. R36's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents no Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was performed due to resident is rarely/never understood. Section GG documented for R36's eating ability, substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort, helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort) is needed. R36's Order summary report documents and order dated 03/30/2022 with no end date listed for: General diet - mechanical soft texture. Thin consistency, plate guard with pureed vegetable, extra gravy, fortified foods and ice cream with afternoon and evening meals. Another order dated 01/17/23 with no end date listed documents an order for health shakes two times a day in between meals at 7:00 AM and 3:00 PM. R36's Care Plan documents a Focus Area that R36 is unable to consume regular consistency foods and requires a mechanically altered diet with fruit and vegetables pureed. R36 has cognitive impairment and difficulty swallowing/chewing with a date of 04/25/21. The interventions documented are: monitor and record intake every shift, monitor for signs/symptoms of aspiration with a date of 09/07/2020, monitor weight as indicated monthly and PRN (as needed) with a date of 09/07/2020, position for eating and drinking safely with a date of 09/07/2020, provide diet as ordered, mechanical soft with pureed fruits and vegetables, fortified foods, extra desserts, heath shakes, 1 time daily with meals or as desired, whole milk at all meals. Plate guard provided to encourage self feeding with a date of 05/14/2021. Provide medications for hyperlipidemia and monitor for side effects and adverse reactions and report to MD if noted, with a date of 04/25/2021. Refer to ST (Speech Therapy) for evaluation and treat as indicated with a date of 09/07/2020. On 05/20/24 at 11:00 AM, V22 (Cook) made mashed potatoes with creamy classic mashed potatoes and hot water. No fortified potatoes were observed to be prepared. The recipe titled power potatoes documents ingredients: milk 2%, milk nonfat dry, potato, mashed instant, sour cream, margarine, and salt. On 05/20/24 at approximately 12:00 PM during lunch service, there was only one pan of mashed potatoes on the steamtable. Regardless if dietary cards listed fortified potatoes, the creamy classic mashed potatoes were observed to be served to all residents. On 05/20/24 at approximately 12:45 PM, R36 received a #10 dip of regular mashed potatoes, no fortified mashed potatoes, no extra gravy and no ice cream on his lunch tray. On 05/20/24 at 2:00 PM, V22 (Cook) stated that the mashed potatoes that were made for lunch were made with the potato flakes and hot water, and they were the only potatoes made and served that day. On 05/20/24 at 2:40 PM V28 (Activity Aide/CNA) passed afternoon snacks and there were no nutritional house supplements/shakes or ice cream on the snack cart. At approximately 3:00 PM, V28 was done passing snacks and moved the snack cart from the dining room. On 05/20/24 between 2:20 PM and 3:30 PM, R36 did not receive a health shake and no ice cream was given during snack time either. On 05/21/24 at approximately 12:40 PM, R36 received ground philly chicken sandwich, soft tater tots, and soft chopped fruit salad, R36 did not receive a nutritional house supplement, a fortified food item or ice cream with his lunch tray. On 05/21/24 at 2:30 PM, V28 passed afternoon snacks and there were no nutritional house supplements on the snack cart. At approximately 3:00 PM, V28 was done passing snacks and moved the snack cart from the dining room. On 05/21/24 between 2:35 PM - 3:15 PM, R36 did not receive a nutritional house supplement or ice cream during snack time. On 05/22/24 at 1:00 PM, R36 did not receive a nutritional house supplement, a fortified food item or ice cream with his lunch tray. On 05/22/24 at 2:35 PM, V28 passed afternoon snacks and there were no nutritional house supplements/shakes on the snack cart. At approximately 3:00 PM, V28 was done passing snacks and moved the snack cart from the dining room. On 05/22//24 between 2:35 PM - 3:15 PM, R36 did not receive a nutritional house supplement or ice cream. 4. R44's Transfer/Discharge Report documents an admission date of 08/03/20 with diagnoses including: Alzheimers's Disease with early onset, Disorientation, Essential Hypertension, Hypothyroidism, Unspecified Psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, Dehydration, Fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, Seizures, and Rhabdomyolysis. R44's MDS dated [DATE] documents no BIMS was conducted due to R44 is rarely/never understood. Section GG indicates R44 is dependent for eating. R44's Physician Order Sheet documents an order for house nutrition supplement two times a day for nutritional supplement iso source 1.5 give 90cc (cubic centimeters) BID (twice a day) with an order date of 04/18/2024. R44's dietary card documents: lunch- nutritional ice cream in a bowl, power pudding, health shake for all meals. R44's Care Plan documents a Focus Area of R44 is unable to consume regular consistency foods with toast or breads all meals. R44 needs total assistance with all her meals with a revision date of 06/13/23 with interventions documented as: monitor and record intake every shift with a date of 11/06/20, monitor for sign/symptoms of aspiration dated 11/06/20, monitor weight as indicated weekly and prn dated 12/16/20, provide diet as ordered, mechanical soft with breads or toast with all meals, adding nutritional ice cream one time daily with meal of choice, health shake three times a day with meals, diet supplemented with 120 mls (milliliters) med pass TID (three times a day) dated 06/13/23, and refer to ST for evaluation and treat as indicated dated 11/06/20. On 05/20/24 at 12:40 PM, R44 did not receive nutritional ice cream in a bowl, power pudding, or a health shake. On 05/21/24 at 12:40 PM, R44 did not receive nutritional ice cream in a bowl, power pudding, or a health shake. On 05/22/24 at 1:00 PM, R50 did not receive nutritional ice cream in a bowl, power pudding, or a health shake.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure newly admitted residents were offered to formulate Advanced ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure newly admitted residents were offered to formulate Advanced Directives for three of five residents (R12, R62, and R113) reviewed for Advanced Directives in a sample of 38. Findings included: 1. R62's Face Sheet documents an admission date to the facility on [DATE]. A Progress note in R62's EHR (Electronic Health Record) dated [DATE] at 14:29 (2:29 PM) documented the following in part: CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) called this writer (V11 Registered Nurse/RN) to resident's (R62) room. Resident was laying with head resting on arm on bedside table. No respirations, no pulse radial or carotid palpated . (V14 RN) checked chart for POLST (Physician's Order for Life Sustaining Treatment/Advanced Directives). None found. V6 (RN) began CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) time of death called by EMS (Emergency Medical Service) at 12:47 PM. On [DATE] at 12:10 PM, V2 stated R62's Advanced Directive was not in his EHR due to it being out for his doctor to sign and she did not know why a copy was not scanned into R62's chart and available for staff to access when needed. 2. R12's Face Sheet documents an admission date to the facility on [DATE]. R12's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) dated [DATE] documented R12's BIMS score is 14 out of 15 indicating R12 is cognitively intact. On [DATE] at 12:00 PM, R12 stated he did not remember the facility staff talking to him about Advanced Directive choices when he was admitted to the facility back in March. R12's EHR did not contain an Advanced Directive for R12. R12's Face Sheet, under the section labeled Advanced Directive is left blank. R12's POS (Physian Order Sheet) for [DATE] also does not include an order for Advanced Directives. On [DATE] at 11:30 AM, V31 (RN) said she could not find any Advanced Directives for R113 when she reviewed his chart. V31 could not find Advanced Directives in R12's chart either. On [DATE] at 11:37am, V14 (RN) said she could not find any Advanced Directives for R113 after reviewing R113's chart. V14 could not find Advanced Directives in R12's chart either. 3. R113's Face Sheet documents an admission date to the facility on [DATE]. R113's BIMS dated [DATE] documents R113's BIMS score is a 15 out of 15 indicating R113 is cognitively intact. On [DATE] at 1:30 PM, R113 stated the facility staff never discussed his advanced directive preferences when he was admitted to this facility. R113's EHR did not contain documentation of an Advanced Directive for R113. R113's Face Sheet, under the section labeled Advance Directive is left blank. R113's POS for [DATE] also does not include an order for Advanced Directives. On [DATE] at 12:10 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) said R113's Advanced Directives must have been missed when he was admitted to this facility, but she was contacting R113's previous facility for a copy of it. Facility policy titled Advanced Directives with last revision date of [DATE], documents the following in part: At the time of admission, each resident will be asked if they have made advanced directives and provided educational information regarding state and federal law. The resident, legal representative or the individual who has been authorized as the resident's health care representative will be asked if an advanced directive has been executed. Documentation concerning this inquiry and the individual response shall include the date the entry was made and the individual making this inquiry. This information shall be included in the resident's medical record. Copies of the resident's advanced directives shall be made and maintained in the resident's EHR and financial folder. A written physician's order is required in response to the resident's advanced directives. Physician's order shall be specific and address each advanced directive.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a PASRR (Preadmission Screeening and Resident Review) level two screening for a resident with a newly diagnosed Severe Mental Illnes...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a PASRR (Preadmission Screeening and Resident Review) level two screening for a resident with a newly diagnosed Severe Mental Illness for 1 (R11) of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR in a sample of 38. R11's Face Sheet dated 5/23/24 documents an admission date of 03/10/2014 with a diagnosis of Schizoaffective disorder. R11's OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) I Initial Screen documentation dated 03/05/2014 lists Reasonable Basis to Suspect a Mental Illness .The individual has been formally diagnosed with a mental illness which substantially impairs the person's cognitive, emotional and /or behavioral functioning with a corresponding box that is marked No. R11's Physician Order documents an order on 08/04/22 to add Schizoaffective Disorder to R11's diagnosis list as evidenced by assessment with behaviors. On 05/23/24 at 2:10 PM, V8 (Social Service Director/SSD) stated that a new PASRR screen should have been completed when R11 received the new diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder on 8/4/2022. V8 stated that she was currently working on getting the screening completed.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, homelike environment for 10 of 38 residents (R57, R113, R2, R15, R16, R19, R57, R214, R11, R22) reviewed for ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, homelike environment for 10 of 38 residents (R57, R113, R2, R15, R16, R19, R57, R214, R11, R22) reviewed for homelike environment in a sample of 38. On 5/20/2024 at approximately 9:45 AM, R2 was noted sitting in his bedside recliner. R2's bedroom floor had food debris and paper trash scattered about and trailed out into the hallway. On the morning of 5/20/2024, 5/21/2014 and 5/22/2024 at 2:00 PM, R2's bathroom was noted to have dark yellow odorous urine in the toilet bowl and two urine soaked adult briefs were noted in the bathroom trash can. One of the two urine soaked briefs were marked in ink with surveyor's initials on the edge of the brief on 5/20/2024 and the same ink mark was present on the brief on 5/21/2024 at 2:00 PM. On 5/20/2024 at approximately 10:00 AM, R113 was observed laying in his bed in his room with a finished breakfast tray sitting on his bedside table. Food debris and paper trash was noted about the floor in R113's room. A urine soaked adult brief was noted in R113's bedroom trash can and one on the floor under the end of his bed. Food debris and paper trash was seen scattered on the floor and around R113's bed linens. The toilet in R113's bathroom had dark odorous urine noted in the toilet bowl with a urine soaked adult brief noted in the trash can of the bathroom. On 5/20/2024 at 11:37 AM, R57 still had a half eaten breakfast tray sitting on the bedside table. R57's bed was not made and a pile of urine soiled sheets were wadded up and sitting in R57's bedside chair. At 11:40 AM, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) verified the linens were soiled with dried brown urine rings and were from R57's bed. R57's private bathroom was noted to have two urine soaked briefs/pads in the trash can and a strong scent of urine was present in the room and bathroom. On 5/21/2024 at 1:00 PM, R15 said the facility is very short staffed and needs more help. R15 said the facility isn't getting cleaned properly and is always dirty. R15's (Brief Interview for Mental Status) BIMS score dated 2/18/24 documents R15 scored 15 out of 15, indicating R15 is cognitively intact. On 5/23/2024 at 11:37 PM, V14 (Registered Nurse/RN) said the facility has frequent staff call-ins and is often short staffed so residents' rooms don't always get cleaned as scheduled. On 5/20/2024 at 1:00 PM, R16, R214, R2, R11, R22, R15, R57 and R19's beds were noted to still not be made from the night's sleep. On 5/21/2024 at 1:37 PM, R16, R214, R2, R11, R22, R15, R57 and R19's beds were noted to still not be made from the night's sleep. On 5/21/2024 at 2:45 PM, 15 dirty noon meal trays were noted to still remain on the [NAME] and Tulip hallways waiting to be cleaned up. V28 (Activity Aide) said the CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) are supposed to pick up the finished hall trays and make all the beds, but the facility is frequently short staffed and often the trays sit around for a long period of time after meals are finished and beds don't get made. On 5/21/2024 at 8:45 AM, V30 (Ombudsman) said she has been notified by several residents of the facility being dirty and malodorous, but could not share who the residents were due to confidentiality requests made by the residents. V30 said residents have complained to her about meal trays not getting picked up timely and sitting about the facility for extremely long periods of time. Facility document titled Concern/Compliment Form dated 4/10/2024 documents the following resident concern: Housekeeping not grabbing trash on the weekends. Another form dated 3/13/2024 documented the following: Only spot cleaning room instead of cleaning the entire room and Tulip hall is hit or miss. They might clean one to two rooms then skip the rest of the rooms on that hall. Trash not being taken out in rooms and bathrooms. Trash overflow in kitchenette. Facility document titled Complaint Resolution Form dated 4/10/2024 documents the following concern: Diabetic testing strips that have been used are being found all throughout the hallway floors. On 5/21/2024 at 12:00pm, a substance that appeard to be dried bowel movement was observed in the floor of the Daisy/Tulip hall shower room. V7 (CNA) verified it was bowel movement and should have been cleaned up immediately, but was missed somehow. .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. R11's Face Sheet documents an admission date of 03/10/2014 with diagnoses in part of Parkinson's, Morbid (Severe) Obesity, Ty...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. R11's Face Sheet documents an admission date of 03/10/2014 with diagnoses in part of Parkinson's, Morbid (Severe) Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia without lower urinary tract infections. R11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in section C a BIMS score of 9, which indicates moderate cognitive impairment. Section GG documents that R11 is dependent for toileting, bathing/showering and personal hygiene and R11 needs substantial/maximum assist with transfers. R11's Current Care Plan documents R11 has limited physical mobility r/t (related to) H/O (history of) CVA (Cerebral Vascular Accident) and Parkinson's with interventions of provide supportive care, assistance with mobility as needed. R11 has ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit with interventions in part of Bathing/Showering, R11 requires physical help in part of showering x 1 staff member to provide shower. The Facility Shower list dated 05/14/24 documents that R11 is to have showers on Tuesday and Fridays every week. R11's Shower documentation/skin assessment sheets were reviewed on 5/22/24 and document showers completed on 4/2/24, 4/5/24, 4/9/24, 4/10/24, 4/16/24,4/23/24, 4/26/24, 4/30/24, 5/7/24, 5/14/24, 5/17/24, 5/21/24. No shower documentation was found for 04/12/24, 04/19/24 or 05/10/24. R11 was documented to refuse a shower on 05/03/24. On 05/22/24 at 11:28 AM, R11 was observed to have oily looking hair and clothes appeared wrinkled and soiled with food stains. R11 had a body odor smell about his person. On 05/22/24 at 1:30 PM R11 who was alert and oriented to person, place and time, stated he is lucky to get a shower once a week. R11 said that they tell him often that it's his shower day, which is on Tuesday and Friday, but never come back to get him for the shower. R11 said that most of the time he feels like he maybe gets a shower once a week. R11 said they could use some more help and maybe he would get his showers like he is supposed to. R11 stated that he has not had a shower now in over a week. 4. R214's admission Record dated 05/23/24 documents an admission date of 05/16/24 with diagnoses in part of End Stage Renal Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, dependence on renal dialysis, Anemia, Hypertension, Seizures, Hyperkalemia, and Hyperprolactinemia. R214's MDS dated [DATE] is currently in progress and does not document anything in section C or GG. R214's Care Plan which was also currently in progress documents on 05/20/24 that R214 is capable of independently choosing programs in which to participate. The Facility Shower list dated 05/14/24 was reviewed on 5/22/24 and does not document R214's name on the shower list. R214's shower sheets/skin assessment documents on 05/17/24 bed bath given; no other shower sheets could be provided up request. On 05/20/24 at 12:30 PM, R214 who was alert and oriented to person, place and time stated she has only been washed up by staff since she has been at the facility. R214 stated she would love to take a shower, but they haven't given her one yet. R214 stated that she arrived at the facility on 05/16/24. R214 said that she needs assistance of two staff with transfers and with showering. On 05/22/24 at 11:30 AM, R214 stated that she still has not received a shower. R214 said that she has even asked for one, but staff said they would get to her later and they never have. The Facility Bathing policy with revision date of 1/31/18, documents the following in part: To ensure resident's cleanliness to maintain proper hygiene and dignity. A shower, tub bath or bed bath will be offered according to the resident's preference two times per week. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers as scheduled for residents who require assistance for 4 (R113, R48, R11, R214) of 5 residents reviewed for assistance with Activities of Daily Living in a sample of 38. Findings included: 1. R113's Face Sheet documented an admission date to the facility on 5/8/2024 with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. R113's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 5/9/2024 documents R113 scored 15 out of 15 total, indicating R113 is cognitively intact. R113's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R113 needs substantial/maximum assistance from staff for bathing, dressing and transferring. On 5/20/2024 at approximately 10:00 AM, R113 was observed laying in his bed in his room. R113's appearance was disheveled, had greasy dirty hair and had a strong scent of urine and body odor about his person. On 5/22/2024 at 12:46 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) said R113 has not received a shower since being admitted to this facility, but the staff were giving him one now. V2 verified R113 needed staff assistance to shower and cannot shower independently. V2 said the facility could only produce bathing documentation for the one shower given that day and no other documentation was available. On 5/22/2024 at 1:30 PM, R113 said he just received his first shower since being admitted to this facility on 5/8/2024. R113 said he uses a wheelchair to propel about the facility due to not being able to walk. R113 said he needs staff assistance to get a shower and cannot shower independently. 2. R2's Face Sheet documented an admission date to the facility on 1/3/2024 with a diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy. R2's BIMS dated 4/2/2024 documents a score of 14 out of 15 total, indicating R2 is cognitively intact. R2's MDS dated [DATE] section GG documents R2 is dependent on staff for bathing, toileting, dressing and transferring. On 5/20/2024 at approximately 9:45 AM, R2 was noted sitting in his bedside recliner with oily disheveled hair, moderate beard growth with food in his beard and on his clothing. R2 had a strong scent of urine body odor about his person. R2 stated he would like to take a shower every day, but he is lucky to get one per week and sometimes doesn't get that. R2 said the facility needs more workers and this is why he doesn't get showered as scheduled. The facility shower list, with revision date of 5/22/24, documents R2 is to be showered on Tuesdays and Fridays. A review of R2's shower documentation for March, April and May 2024 revealed R2 received four showers in March (3/3, 3/7, 3/12, 3/22), four showers in April (4/2, 4/5, 4/12, 4/23) and two showers in May (5/3, 5/10). On 5/23/2024 at 10:40 AM, V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) said the residents are supposed to get two showers offered per week, but staff calling off causes the showers to not get completed in a timely manner.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature for 4 (R214,...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature for 4 (R214, R38, R48 and R3) of 4 residents reviewed for palatable temperatures in a sample of 38. Findings include: 1. R214's admission Record documents an admission date of 05/16/24 with diagnoses in part of End Stage Renal Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, dependence on renal dialysis, Anemia, Hypertension, Seizures, Hyperkalemia, and Hyperprolactinemia. R214's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] is currently in progress and does not document anything in section C or GG. On 05/20/24 at 12:30PM, R214 was alert and oriented to person, place and time and stated that the food is always cold if she eats in her room. R214 said that she only ate in her room a couple of times, but that the food was always cold when she did. R214 said that she started going to the dining room just so she could have a warm meal. 2. R38's Transfer/Discharge report, undated documents an admission date of 07/06/23 with diagnoses in part of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Acute Kidney Failure, Morbid Obesity, Depression, Atrial Fibrillation, Iron Deficiency Anemia, Unsteadiness on Feet, Lack of Coordination, and Unspecified Injury of Right Achilles Tendon. R38's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in Section C a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating R38 is cognitively intact. Section GG documents for eating, R38 requires set-up and clean-up assistance. R38 is dependent for transfers and propelling wheelchair. R38's Care plan dated 04/24/24 documents R38 has a potential nutritional problem. Interventions include in part, to encourage PO (oral) intake of meals and snacks, provide, serve diet as ordered. Monitor intake and record q (Every) meal. R38 has Anemia and interventions include in part, encourage intake of foods high in iron, vitamin c, review diet and make recommendations as required. On 05/20/24 at 10:35AM, R38 stated that she eats her tray in her room most of the time. R38 said that her food is always cold when she gets it. R38 said there are times she won't get a tray at the normal lunch times, it may be an hour later. R38 said that she has asked a couple of the certified nurse assistants to warm her food up for her because it's so cold. R38 could not remember off hand which certified nurse assistants warmed up the food for her. 3. On 05/20/24 at 10:50 AM, R48 was alert to person, place and time and stated the food can be cold at times. 4. On 05/20/24 at approximately 11:45 AM while waiting for lunch to be served, R3 stated the food is usually cold. A Concern/Complaint form submitted by R3 dated 04/10/24 documents: at times in the lunch dining room food isn't hot. On 05/20/24 at 10:30 AM a digital metal stemmed thermometer used for taking temperatures for this survey was checked for accuracy using the ice-point method and was accurate within +/- 2 degrees Fahrenheit. On 05/20/24 at 1:54 PM when the last hall tray was being delivered, the tray was refused. In the presence of V19 (Medical Records/CNA), the refused tray was measured for temperatures. The fish was 81 degrees Fahrenheit, the rice was 96 degrees Fahrenheit, and the stuffing was 90.5 degrees Fahrenheit. The food was then tasted and all items tasted cold. On 05/22/24 at 11:00 AM a digital metal stemmed thermometer used for taking temperatures for this survey was checked for accuracy using the ice-point method and was accurate within +/- 2 degrees Fahrenheit. On 05/22/24 at 1:31 PM when the last hall tray was being delivered, this tray was also refused and was therefore measured for temperatures. The hamburger steak was 115 degrees Fahrenheit, the scalloped potatoes were 112 degrees Fahrenheit, and the broccoli was 103 degrees Fahrenheit. The food was then tasted and all items tasted cold. On 05/28/24 at 11:03 AM, V29 (Registered Dietician) stated, she would expect the food to be served at an appetizing temperature to the residents.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review and observation, the facility failed to provide enough staff to meet residents needs and provi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review and observation, the facility failed to provide enough staff to meet residents needs and provide timely assistance with care. This has the potential to effect all 67 residents residing at this facility. Findings included: 1. On 5/20/2024 at 11:37 AM, R57 still had a half eaten breakfast tray sitting on the bedside table. R57's bed was not made and a pile of urine soiled sheets were wadded up and sitting in R57's bedside chair. At 11:40 AM, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) verified the linens were soiled with dried brown urine rings and were from R57's bed. R57's private bathroom was noted to have two urine soaked briefs/pads in the trash can and a strong scent of urine was present. 2. R113's Face Sheet documented an admission date to the facility on 5/8/2024 with diagnoses of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction. R113's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 5/9/2024 documented a score of 15, indicating R113 is cognitively intact. R113's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R113 needs substantial/maximum assistance from staff for bathing, dressing and transferring. On 5/20/2024 at approximately 10:00 AM, R113 was observed laying in his bed in his room with a finished breakfast tray sitting on his bedside table. Food debris and paper trash was noted about the floor in R113's room. R113 was disheveled, had greasy dirty hair and had a strong scent of urine and body odor about his person. On 5/22/2024 at 1:30 PM, R113 said he just received his first shower since being admitted to this facility on 5/8/2024. R113 said he uses a wheelchair to propel about the facility due to not being able to walk. R113 said he needs staff assistance to get a shower and cannot shower independently. R113 said the facility needs more staff to help with resident care and often there isn't any staff to clean his room. During this interview, a urine soaked adult brief was noted in R113's bedroom trash can and one on the floor under the end of his bed. Food debris and paper trash was also seen on the floor and around R113's bed linens. 3. R2's Face Sheet documented an admission date to the facility on 1/3/2024 with a diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy. R2's BIMS dated 4/2/2024 documents a score of 14, indicating R2 is cognitively intact. R2's MDS (dated 4/2/24) section GG documents R2 is dependent on staff for bathing, toileting, dressing and transferring. On 5/20/2024 at approximately 9:45 AM, R2 was noted sitting in his bedside recliner with oily disheveled hair, moderate beard growth with food in his beard and on his clothing. R2 had a strong scent of urine body odor about his person. R2 said he would like to take a shower every day, but he is lucky to get one per week and sometimes doesn't get that. R2 said the facility needs more workers and this is why he doesn't get showered as scheduled. R2 stated at times he also has to wait up to 45 minutes for his call light to be answered. 4. R52's Transfer/Discharge report dated 5/23/24 documents an admission date of 01/13/23 with diagnoses in part of Anemia, Chronic Kidney Disease, Drug Induced Subacute Dyskinesia, Hyperlipidemia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Dementia, and Multiple Myeloma not having achieved remission. R52's MDS dated [DATE] documents in Section C a BIMS score of 3, which indicates severe cognitive impairment. Section GG documents R52 is dependent for eating, oral hygiene, dressing, personal hygiene, and positioning. R52's undated Care Plan documents an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care /mobility performance (Functional Abilities) deficit that may fluctuate with activity throughout the day r/t (Related to) dementia, disease progress. Interventions include in part for Eating that R52's usual performance is dependent. On 05/22/24 at 12:00PM, R52 was served his lunch tray with no staff sitting at the table to assist him with his food tray covered. At 12:15 PM, V19 (Medical Records) attempted to wake R52 up to assist him with eating, but no bites were given. At 12:18 PM, V19 got up from the table and another staff member came in to assist R52. A male unknown staff member sat down and started to talk to R52 to wake him up, but another unknown female staff member came into the dining room and told the unknown male staff member, who was getting ready to assist R52, that she didn't have any help on the hall and needed his assistance with another resident. At 12:20PM, the unknown male staff member left without giving R52 a bite. At 12:21 PM, V19 came back into the dining room and sat back down with R52 and again started to assist him with eating. 5. On 5/20/2024 at 11:40 PM, R6's call was observed to be activated. At 12:16 PM, V7 (CNA) entered R6's room and answered the call light. V7 stated the facility is frequently short staffed due to call-ins. V7 said residents have to wait for care due to the facility being short staffed. V7 said she finds it hard to get all of the residents' care done due to the facility having several staff call-ins. 6. R11's Face Sheet documents an admission date of 03/10/2014 with diagnoses in part of Parkinson's, Morbid (Severe) Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia without lower urinary tract infections. R11's MDS dated [DATE] documents in section C a BIMS score of 9, which indicates moderate cognitive impairment. Section GG documents that R11 is dependent for toileting, bathing/showering and personal hygiene and R11 needs substantial/maximum assist with transfers. R11's Current Care Plan documents R11 has limited physical mobility r/t (related to) H/O (history of) CVA (Cerebral Vascular Accident) and Parkinson's with interventions of provide supportive care, assistance with mobility as needed. R11 has ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit with interventions in part of Bathing/Showering, R11 requires physical help in part of showering x 1 staff member to provide shower. The Facility Shower list dated 05/14/24 documents that R11 is to have showers on Tuesday and Fridays every week. R11's Shower documentation/skin assessment sheets were reviewed on 5/22/24 and show no shower documentation found for 04/12/24, 04/19/24 or 05/10/24. On 05/22/24 at 11:28 AM, R11 was observed to have oily looking hair and clothes appeared wrinkled and soiled with food stains. R11 had a body odor smell about his person. On 05/22/24 at 1:30 PM, R11 who was alert and oriented to person, place and time at the time of questioning, stated he is lucky to get a shower once a week. R11 said that they tell him often that it's his shower day, which is on Tuesday and Friday, but never come back to get him for the shower. R11 said that most of the time he feels like he maybe gets a shower once a week. R11 said they could use some more help and maybe he would get his showers like he is supposed to. R11 stated that he has not had a shower now in over a week. 7. R214's admission Record dated 05/23/24 documents an admission date of 05/16/24 with diagnoses in part of End Stage Renal Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, dependence on renal dialysis, Anemia, Hypertension, Seizures, Hyperkalemia, and Hyperprolactinemia. R214's MDS dated [DATE] is currently in progress and does not document anything in section C or GG. R214's Care Plan which was also currently in progress documents on 05/20/24 that R214 is capable of independently choosing programs in which to participate. The Facility Shower list dated 05/14/24 was reviewed on 5/22/24 and does not document R214's name on the shower list. R214's shower sheets/skin assessment documents on 05/17/24 bed bath given; no other shower sheets could be provided up request. On 05/20/24 at 12:30 PM, R214 who was alert and oriented to person, place and time stated she has only been washed up by staff since she has been at the facility. R214 stated she would love to take a shower, but they haven't given her one yet. R214 stated that she arrived at the facility on 05/16/24. R214 said that she needs assistance of two staff with transfers and with showering. On 05/22/24 at 11:30 AM, R214 stated that she still has not received a shower. R214 said that she has even asked for one, but staff said they would get to her later and they never have. On 5/20/2024 at 1:00 PM, R16, R214, R2, R11, R22, R15, R57 and R19's beds were noted to still not be made from the previous night's sleep. On 5/21/2024 at 1:00 PM, R15 stated the facility is very short staffed and needs more help. R15 said the facility isn't getting cleaned and the residents are waiting long periods of time for care to be provided. R15's BIMS dated 2/18/24 documents a score of 15, indicating R15 is cognitively intact. On 5/21/2024 at 1:37 PM, R16, R214, R2 R11, R22, R15, R57 and R19's beds were noted to still not be made from the previous night's sleep. On 5/21/2024 at 2:45 PM, 15 dirty meal trays were noted to still remain on the [NAME] and Tulip hallways, and V28 (Activity Aide) said the CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) are supposed to pick up the finished hall trays and make all the beds but the facility is frequently short staffed, and often the trays sit around for a long period of time after meals are finished and beds don't get made. On 5/23/2024 at 10:40 AM, V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing) said the residents are supposed to get two showers offered per week, but staff calling off causes the showers to not get completed in a timely manner. On 5/23/2024 at 11:37 AM, V14 (Registered Nurse) stated the facility has frequent care staff call-ins and is often short on resident care staff. A facility form titled Complaint Resolution Form dated 3/13/2024 documents the following: Problem-Too many call in's causing them not to have staff on the floor. Need to come down on CNAs about too many call in's. The Resident List Report dated 05/20/24 documents 67 residents residing at the facility
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the approved menu and failed to make a reasonab...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the approved menu and failed to make a reasonable effort to provide menus in accordance with religious/cultural needs of residents. This failure has the potential to effect all 67 residents residing at the facility. Finding include: 1. The facility's Diet Spreadsheet dated Day 16 Monday documents: Lunch: Regular: beef & broccoli Stir fry #8 dip x 2, steamed rice #8 dip, vegetable blend 4 oz spdl, egg roll 1, blushing pears 4 oz spdl. Pureed: pureed beef & broccoli stir fry with sauce #8 dip x 2, pureed rice with gravy or sauce #10 dip with gravy, pureed vegetable blend #12 dip, pureed egg roll #10 dip, pureed blushing pears #10 dip. On Monday 05/20/24 at 11:15 AM, V22 (Cook) stated they were not having the beef and broccoli stir fry listed on the menu for lunch because they did not have it. V22 stated it should be on the truck that arrived today, so they are having fish instead and the substitute is the leftover pot stickers from last night. The facility's Diet Spreadsheet dated Day 13 (Friday) documents: Lunch: Regular: Baked Fish 2oz (ounces) Beans & [NAME] #8 dip, cheesy spinach 4oz spdl (spoodle), fudge brownie 2 (inch) x 4 svg (serving), bread/margarine 1 slice/1 tsp (teaspoon). Pureed: pureed baked fish #12 dip, pureed rice beans & rice #8 dip, pureed cheesy spinach #12 dip, pureed brownie #10 dip. On 05/20/24 at 11:52 AM, R14 stated they don't really serve them much food. On 05/20/24 at approximately 12:00 PM, V21 (Cook) served 1 piece of baked fish, #12 dip of steamed rice, #8 scoop of stuffing, and 4 oz spdl pears for the regular diet and pureed pot stickers casserole #16 dip, pureed stuffing #16 dip, mashed potatoes #10 dip, and 4 oz applesauce for the pureed diet. On 05/20/24 at 1:16 PM, V16 (Dietary Manager) weighed a piece of fish that was being served and it weighed 1.3 ounces. At this time, V16 stated she thought the serving of fish looked a little small. On 05/20/24 at 2:47 PM, V16 (Dietary Manager) stated she does not know why they did not have a vegetable with lunch, or why they did not puree any fish, rice, or pears. On 05/21/24 at 10:30 AM, V16 (Dietary Manager) stated she does not have a recipe for the needed serving size for the pot sticker casserole that was served, so she does not know how much protein would be in a serving. V16 stated she was recently informed that the potstickers were from activities, so they probably should not have used them as part of the meal on 5/20/24. On 05/28/24 at 11:10 AM, V29 (Registered Dietician) stated she would expect the menu to be followed or if a substitute day's menu was being used, for the portion sizes from that menu to be followed. She stated she would have expected 2 ounces of the fish to be served and for a vegetable to be served. V29 stated she would have expected the same portion of rice to be served as listed on the menu and for the fish to have been pureed for the pureed menu. 2. R45's Transfer/Discharge Report dated 5/22/24 documents an admission date of 04/16/21 with diagnoses in part of Cognitive Communication Deficit, Dysphagia, Alzheimer's Disease, Lack of Coordination and Contracture of left hand. R45's MDS dated [DATE] documents in Section C a BIMS score of 0, indicating R45 was unable to complete the BIMS. Staff assessment for mental status was completed and documents short term memory problems and long-term memory problems with moderately impaired decision making, which indicates that R45 makes poor decisions. Section GG documents R45 requires supervision or touching assistance with eating. R45's Care Plan undated, documents a focus are of R45 practices the Hindi culture. R45 prefers to eat on the floor, legs crossed, with her tray in front of her. R45 is also Vegan but will sometimes drink milk and eat plain yogurt. R45 has another focus area of ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care/mobility performance (functional abilities) deficit that may fluctuate with activity throughout the day r/t (related to) Alzheimer's disease process. An intervention listed documents Eating: My usual performance is substantial or maximal assistance. An additional Focus Area documents R45 is able to consume regular consistency foods, R45 is Vegan. R45 does not eat meats or dairy products. R45 will occasionally drink milk, but would like to request it when R45 desires, R45 requests not to eat after 7:00 PM, only drink water after that time. Interventions listed include to provide diet as ordered, Regular/Vegan, adding rice/beans/peanut butter when desired. R45's Physician Orders document nutritional ice cream supplement with lunch and dinner order date of 11/29/23, Resident (R45) to have house stock nutritional supplement TID (Three times a day) with meals order date of 11/29/23, and General diet mechanical soft texture, regular consistency, nutritional supplement TID, nutritional ice cream at lunch and supper order date of 01/18/24. On 5/20/24 at approximately 12:40 PM, V21 (Cook) wasn't sure what to serve R45. V16 (Dietary Manager) said give R45 fish, she will eat that sometimes. V16 stated they give R45 fruit loops a lot. When V16 was asked if they had a specific menu for R45, she stated no but they probably should have. On 05/20/24 at 1:15PM, R45 was served a mechanical soft tray which included fish. R45 was not served her ordered nutritional supplement shake or ice cream. On 05/29/24 at 11:10 AM, V29 (Registered Dietician) stated, she would expect all supplements and fortified foods that were ordered to be served as ordered. V29 stated the company did not have a vegetarian or vegan menu but R45's husband has stated that she will sometimes eat dairy, some meat and grilled cheese. The Resident Council minutes for 04/10/24 documented: Dietary: portion control is all over the place. The Resident List Report dated 05/20/24 documents 67 residents residing at the facility.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in a safe and sanitary environment and on sanitary dishes. This has the potential to effect all 67 resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in a safe and sanitary environment and on sanitary dishes. This has the potential to effect all 67 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: On 05/20/24 at 9:30 AM, upon the initial tour of the kitchen, the large stand mixer had dried food splashes on the head of the mixer. In the cooler, there was a bowl of what appeared to be pudding that was undated and unlabeled and a container of sliced meat that was undated and unlabeled. There was a large can of opened sweet potatoes that was undated and unlabeled and a partial pan of what appeared to be lasagna in the cooler that was unlabeled and undated. On 05/20/24 at 11:15 AM, V22 (Cook) stated items in the cooler should be labeled, the kitchen is messy, they are doing the best they can. On 05/20/24 at 9:30 AM, there were five plastic portion cups, a fork, a plastic drinking cup, a plastic bag and a pudding cup on the floor under the prep table. Under the second prep table there were three portion cups, two butter packets, and a pudding cup. There were crumbs on the floor under both prep tables, the stove, and under the mixer. On 05/20/24 at 2:47 PM, there was a portable stand fan that had an accumulation of dirt on the front cage and blades blowing on the clean dishes across from the dish machine. On 05/20/24 at 2:47 PM, there were still five plastic portion cups, a fork, a plastic drinking cup, a plastic bag and a pudding cup on the floor under the prep table. Under the second prep table there were three portion cups, two butter packets, and a pudding cup. There were crumbs on the floor under both prep tables, the stove, and under the mixer. On 05/20/24 at 2:47 PM, V22 (Cook) stated they probably should not have a dirty fan blowing on the clean dishes. The Resident List Report dated 05/20/24 documents 67 residents residing at the facility.
Apr 2024 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement planned fall interventions to prevent falls for 1 (R1) of 5 residents reviewed for falls in a sample of 5. This fai...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement planned fall interventions to prevent falls for 1 (R1) of 5 residents reviewed for falls in a sample of 5. This failure resulted in R1 falling, fracturing his right hip and undergoing surgical repair of the fractured hip on 4/2/2024. This past non-compliance occurred from 3/31/2024 to 4/1/2024. Findings included: Per R1's EHR (electronic health record) R1 was admitted to this facility on 11/7/2024 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, Weakness and Insomnia. Per R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/23/24 under section C, R1 was assessed with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) in which R1 scored 3 out of 15 total, indicating R1 has severe cognitive impairment. This same MDS under section GG, documents R1 as needing substantial/maximum assistance from staff for all transferring activities and uses a wheelchair for locomotion about the facility. A Fall Risk Assessment for R1, dated 4/1/2024, documents R1 is a high risk for falls. R1's care plan (initiation date of 11/30/23) documents a focus area of: (R1) is at risk for falls related to decreased safety awareness, unsteady gait and medications that may cause dizziness. This same care plan documents the goal of the focus area as: (R1) will not sustain serious injury through the review date (7/15/24) and planned interventions of: Ensure (bedside) recliner is in down position with foot rest down (initiation date 1/4/24), Anticipate and meet (R1's) needs (initiation date 3/10/24), Bed height to be placed where my feet are flat on the floor (initiation date 11/30/23), Educate (R1)/family/caregivers about safety reminders and what to do if (R1) falls (initiation date 11/30/23), Encourage (R1) to participate in activities that promote exercise, physical activity for strengthening and improved mobility (initiation date 11/30/23), Ensure call light is within reach (initiation date 11/30/23), Follow fall protocol (initiation date 3/10/24), Staff to assist (R1) with toileting upon awakening, before and after meals and at bedtime as (R1) allows (initiation date 4/2/24), and (R1) uses chair/bed electric alarm. Ensure the device is in place as needed (initiation date 11/30/23). On 4/4/2024 at 9:23am, V5 (family) said due to R1's dementia, R1 has increased confusion during the night and attempts to get up without assistance. V5 said the facility implemented a chair/bed pad alarming device to alert staff when R1 attempts to get up without assistance. V5 said she had not seen R1's chair/bed alarm recently when she visited R1 about a week before R1's fall. On 4/4/2024 at 12:30pm, V13 (Registered Nurse/ RN) said R1 uses a chair/bed pad alarm as a safety precaution to help prevent him from getting up and falling. V13 said she has performed safety rounds on R1's hallway and has seen R1's chair/bed pad alarm in his bedside recliner in the past. V13 was asked to point out where R1's chair/bed pad alarm was at, since the alarm pad could not be located in R1's room at the time of this interview. After searching, V13 responded she could not find the alarm. On 4/9/2024 at 8:45am, V20 (RN) was asked if she could locate R1's chair/bed pad alarm since a search of R1's room could not locate the alarm at the time of this interview. After searching, V20 said she could not find the alarm. On 4/4/2024 at 12:40pm, V6, V14, V15 (all Certified Nursing Assistants/CNA) said they are the usual day time staff who provide care for R1 and R1 is supposed to have a chair/bed pad alarm on. On 4/4/2024 at 2:40pm, V7 (CNA) said she, V8 (CNA) and V4 (RN) were the staff providing care for R1 on 3/31/2024 at the time R1 fell. V7 said R1 likes to sleep in his bedside recliner and does not really sleep in his bed. V7 said R1 does not use a chair/bed pad alarm and only uses a call light when R1 needs assistance. V7 said R1 did not have a chair/bed alarm on when he got up and fell the morning of 3/31/2024. On 4/4/2024 at 2:45pm, V8 (CNA) said she was working with V7 and V4 on 3/31/2024 when R1 fell. V8 said R1 did not have a chair/bed alarm on when he fell. On 4/9/2024 at 8:30am, V4 (RN) said on 3/31/2024, she was working with V7 and V8. V4 said at about 5:00am, she was passing medications when she heard R1 call out for help. V4 said she saw R1 on the floor in the hallway near R1's doorway. V4 said R1 told her he was looking for the bathroom when he fell. V4 said she assessed R1, determined he had a right hip injury due to complaints of pain and sent him to the local hospital ER (Emergency Room) for evaluation. V4 said R1 did not have on a chair/bed pad alarm on 3/31/2024 when he fell. A facility document titled Post Fall Investigation, dated 4/1/2024 documents R1 had an unwitnessed fall due to loss of balance when ambulating without staff, had on non-skid socks, and stated to staff at the time of his fall I was just trying to go to the bathroom. This same document has a place to mark if R1's chair/bed pad alarm was present and if the alarm was sounding at the time of the fall, however this section is left blank and nothing is marked. On 4/4/2024 at 9:23am, V5 (family) said she received a phone call from V4 (Registered Nurse/RN) on 3/31/2024 at around 6:00am informing her R1 had fell, was complaining of right hip pain and was being sent to the local hospital ER for evaluation. V5 said the ER told her R1 had a fractured right hip and needed surgery to repair the fracture. Th local hospital ER records dated 3/31/2024 documented R1 was seen for complaints of right hip pain after falling at his nursing home. A CT (Computed Tomography) scan and X-ray of R1's right hip documented R1 had a displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur and R1 was admitted for surgical management. These same hospital records included a document titled (local hospital) Report of Operation which documented on 4/2/2024, R1 underwent a surgical procedure of Right hip closed reduction with cephalomedullary nail to treat R1's right hip fracture. The facility Fall Prevention Policy dated 11/28/2012, documents the following in part: Purpose: To assure the safety of all residents in the facility. The program will include measures which determine the individual needs of each resident by assessing the risk of falls and implementation of appropriate interventions, to provide necessary supervision and assistive devices are utilized as necessary. Safety interventions will be implemented for each resident identified at risk. All assigned nursing personnel are responsible for ensuring on-going precautions are put in place and consistently maintained. Fall risk interventions will be identified on the care plan. On 4/9/2024 at 4:00pm, V1 (Administrator) pointed out R1's chair/bed alarm pad located in R1's room. A facility form titled In-service Sign in Sheet (dated 4/1/2024) documented all staff were in-serviced on the topic of: Fall Prevention and included a specific section related to R1's planned fall interventions. On 4/9/2024, V1 provided a document titled Past Non-Compliance Removal Time for outlining the actions taken by the facility prior to the survey date to correct the non-compliance. Prior to the survey date, the facility took the following actions to correct the non-compliance: A Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Meeting was held on 4/1/2024 in which V1, V2 (Director of Nursing), V23 (Medical Director), V13 (RN), V24 (Activity Director), V25 (Assistant Director of Nursing), V26 (Care Plan Coordinator) and V27 (Social Service Director) were in attendance and identified the facility was not in compliance with specific regulatory requirements at the time the situation occurred. Actions Taken: 1.) Affected resident (R1) has been assessed, sent to the ER for treatment and assessed. (completed on 4/1/2024) 2.) All nursing staff have been educated on fall interventions. (completed on 4/1/2024) 3.) Affected resident's (R1) care plan updated. (completed 4/1/2024) 4.) Affected resident's (R1) family has been notified of fall (completed on 4/1/2024) 5.) All staff have been educated on fall intervention binders at nurses station (completed on 4/1/2024) 6.) A QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) meeting was held with the medical director to discuss alleged allegation and facility comprehensive follow up (completed on 4/1/2024) 7.) The policy for fall prevention has been reviewed by the ID (interdisciplinary) Team with no changes needed at this time. (completed 4/1/2024)
Feb 2024 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0697 (Tag F0697)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer regularly scheduled ordered pain medication for 1 (R1) o...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer regularly scheduled ordered pain medication for 1 (R1) of 5 residents reviewed for pain management. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing loss of sleep and significant pain to R1's shoulders, back, and knees due to missing R1's 2/5/24 pm dose of her regularly scheduled pain medication. This past noncompliance occurred between 2/05/2024 - 2/09/2024. Findings: R1's face sheet documents an admission to the facility on 4/19/2023 with diagnoses of Chronic Kidney disease, Stage 3 Unspecified, Malignant neoplasm of uterus, part unspecified, other intervertebral disc degeneration, lumbar region, unspecified osteoarthritis, unspecified site, other sleep apnea. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents R1 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating she is cognitively intact. R1's MDS Section J, Pain Management, documents she has a scheduled pain medication regimen. R1's Care Plan documents a Focus of: R1 has chronic pain; Goal: R1 will not have an interruption in normal activities due to pain through the review date; Interventions: Administer analgesia per orders; Evaluate the effectiveness of pain interventions; Review for compliance, alleviating of symptoms, dosing schedules and resident satisfaction with results, impact on functional ability and impact on cognition; Monitor/document for side effects of pain medication; Observe for constipation; new onset or increased agitation, restlessness, confusion, hallucinations, dysphoria; nausea; vomiting; dizziness and falls. Report occurrences to the physician. R1's Physician's Orders dated 4/20/2023 documents Pain Assessment every day and night shift; 4/19/2023 documents Acetaminophen 500mg (milligrams) (2 tabs) every 4 hours as needed for pain; 4/21/2023 documents Percocet 5/325mg three times a day for pain (Unspecified Osteoarthritis, Unspecified site; Other Intervertebral disc degeneration, lumbar region); 2/6/2024 documents Hydrocodone 5/325mg every 8 hours as needed for pain (may substitute if Percocet is unavailable). R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated February 1 - 29, 2024 does not document Percocet 5/325mg was given on 2/5/2024 (9:00 PM); 2/6/2024 (5:00 AM, 1:00 PM, 9:00 PM) and 2/07/2024 (1:00 AM). R1's MAR dated February 1-29, 2024 documents pain assessment every day and night shift completed with pain rating on 2/5/2024 to be 6 and on 2/6/2024 to be 7. No alternative medication was ordered until 2/6/2024 and first dose was given at 5:37 PM. R1's Narcotic Administration Sheet for Percocet 5/325mg documents last dose given on 2/5/2024 at 1:00 PM and documentation of Percocet 5/325mg received on 2/7/2024 (30 tabs) with the next dose given on 2/7/2024 at 12:30 PM. R1's Progress Notes dated 2/06/2024, 6:00 PM (Late Entry) by V4 (Quality Assurance/Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) documents in part .R1 came to this nurse and spoke about being out of her pain pills .asked R1 if she was having pain and R1 stated she was and had been to a doctor's appointment .told R1 a nurse sent a script to V20 (Primary Nurse Practitioner/NP), Monday (2/5/2024) to get signed .it came back Tuesday morning (2/6/2024) that it didn't have quantity amount or DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration) number on it .so V20 was going to escribe it to pharmacy .told R1 that hopefully it would come in on the delivery we would get Tuesday night .When pharmacy delivered Tuesday evening around 10:30 PM, did not have R1's pain medication. R1's Progress Notes dated 2/07/2024, 11:58 AM, documents in part .med delivery guy had been there and delivered R1's pain medications. On 2/14/2024, at 12:30 PM, R1 stated Last week either Sunday or Monday evening, the nurse came in and told me that I was out of my regular pain medication. R1 stated they told her a new nurse forgot to reorder it. R1 stated that the nurse told her that it probably wouldn't be here until tomorrow night and R1 stated that she was not offered any other type of pain medication until the following day. R1 stated that she has arthritis in her shoulders, back, and has had multiple knee replacements. R1 stated that she didn't get any sleep for three nights after missing her regularly scheduled pain medication and her pain was unbearable in her shoulders, back, and knees. R1 stated that she has been on scheduled Percocet for over twenty years and that is the only medication that helps to relieve her pain. On 2/14/2024, at 1:10 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that R1's Percocet medication is not in the facility's emergency medication kit (E-Kit). V2 stated that it is the expectation of her nurses to have any medication that needs to be refilled, to be refilled in a timely manner before the medication runs out. V2 stated that it is the expectation of the nurses to call the primary physician when a medication runs out and get it refilled as soon as possible or get another order for an alternative medication to be given. V2 stated that R1 did get offered an alternative medication on 2/6/2024 and on 2/7/2024. On 2/14/2024, at 1:25 PM, V6 (Ombudsman) stated that V19 (Family) contacted her and told her that R1 ran out of her pain medication. V6 stated that she called R1 and R1 stated to her that she had not received her pain medication for 24 hours. V6 stated that R1 told her that she had been on regularly scheduled Percocet for over 20 years and that is the only pain medication that works for her. V6 stated that she offered R1 a grievance form to fill out. V6 stated that she spoke with V1 (Administrator) and was told R1 was offered an alternative medication but that she refused. V6 stated that V1 verified to her that R1's Percocet was not in the facility's emergency medication kit. V6 stated that V1 verified to her that R1 had missed 5-6 doses of her Percocet medication. V6 stated that V1 told her that R1's Percocet did arrive on 2/7/2024 and that the facility is monitoring to make sure this doesn't happen again. On 2/14/2024, at 1:40 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated that he spoke with V6 (Ombudsman) and told her that R1 ran out of her pain medication and that a back-up alternative was offered and given. V1 stated that R1's Percocet was ordered on 2/5/24 & 2/6/24 and received on 2/7/2024. On 2/14/2024 at 2:00 PM, the emergency medication kit was observed to have no Percocet available. There was hydrocodone 5/325mg available in the emergency medication kit. On 2/14/2024 at 3:05 PM, V9 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated that she works 6:00 AM - 6:00 PM regularly and she worked on 2/5/2024, day shift. V9 stated that she was told in report by V5 (RN) that R1 had one Percocet pill left and that it would need to be reordered. V9 stated that she called V20 (Primary Nurse Practitioner) and told her that we needed a new script for R1's Percocet medication. V9 stated that she gave R1 her last dose of Percocet at 1:00 PM on 2/5/2024. V9 stated that she told V5 (RN) in report that R1's Percocet medication was supposed to come in that evening. On 2/14/2024 at 3:10 PM, V5 (RN) stated that she worked Sunday night, 2/4/2024, and noticed that R1 only had one dose of Percocet left after she gave R1 her regularly scheduled 5:00 AM dose. V5 stated that she did not notify the primary physician at that time, just told V9 (RN) that R1 only had one dose of Percocet left and it needed to be reordered. On 2/20/2024 at 8:10 AM, V10 (RN) stated that she worked on 2/6/2024 and R1 was out of her Percocet medication. V10 stated that she called V20 (Primary Nurse Practitioner) and got an alternative medication (Hydrocodone 5/325mg) ordered for her until the Percocet would come in from the pharmacy. V10 stated that she offered Tylenol to R1 but R1 refused stating, That will not work for me and V10 stated she offered the hydrocodone to her and R1 refused the first time, stating, Those will not work for me, I threw 120 tablets away because that medication would not work for me. V10 stated that she talked to R1 and explained to her that hydrocodone was equivalent to Percocet and R1 finally agreed to take a dose of it. V10 stated that R1 was experiencing more pain than usual that day. V10 stated that R1's Percocet was supposed to arrive from pharmacy later that evening. On 2/20/2024 at 8:20 AM, V11 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated that she worked on 2/6/2024, the night shift and was told in report that R1 was out of her Percocet medication and that hydrocodone could be given as needed until her Percocet medication could be delivered from pharmacy. V11 stated that R1's Percocet medication was supposed to arrive to the facility on 2/6/2024 but did not show up that evening. V11 stated that she called the pharmacy and they told her that it would arrive on the next pharmacy delivery, which would be in the morning. V11 stated that she administered the hydrocodone as ordered for R1 when she was able to have it. On 2/20/2024, at 8:40 AM, V20 (Primary Nurse Practitioner) stated that she was notified on 2/5/2024 that R1 needed her Percocet re-ordered. V20 stated that she reordered R1's Percocet that day but it was sent to the wrong pharmacy. V20 stated that she received another phone call on 2/6/2024 regarding R1 needing her Percocet reordered. V20 stated that when she went into the computer to order it again on 2/6/2024, she noticed she had sent the initial Percocet order to the wrong pharmacy. V20 stated that she reordered the Percocet again as well as ordered an alternative pain medication, hydrocodone 5/325mg that could be given as needed until the Percocet became available. V20 stated that it is her expectation for the nurses to notify her in a timely manner to refill medications and not wait until residents run out of medications. The facility's Pain Management policy dated 7/6/2018 documents in part .Purpose: To establish a program which can effectively manage pain in order to remove adverse physiologic and physiological effects of unrelieved pain and to develop an optimal pain management plan to enhance healing and promote physiological and psychological wellness. The facility's concern/compliment form dated 2/7/2024 documents being filled out by R1 stating: I have to have my pain med regularly; I got my evening med and the nurse told me we were out of percocet and she would check to see if they were ordered; I didn't get my pain med until 2/7/2024 at noon; A very painful 2 days and nights. On 2/15/2024, at 10:30 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated that the facility had a Quality Assurance (QA) meeting on 2/9/2024 to discuss narcotic medications and medication refills. V1 stated the following people attended the QA meeting: V1 (Administrator), V2 (Director of Nursing), V4 (Quality Assurance/LPN), V16 (LPN/MDS/Care Plan Coordinator). V1 stated the measure put in place to ensure that deficient practice does not recur are: V2 (DON) and V4 (QA/LPN) will be checking narcotic books weekly (Tuesday) to see if the facility needs to get any scripts for narcotic medication refills to ensure that they don't run out of any narcotic medications. On 2/14/2024, V1 (Administrator) provided their QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) Ad Hoc Form outlining the actions taken by the facility prior to the survey date to correct the noncompliance. Prior to the survey date, the facility took the following actions to correct the non-compliance: 1. A Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting was held on 2/09/2024. In attendance - V1, V2, V4, and V16. 2. Process/Steps to identify others having the potential to be impacted by the same deficient practice: All residents who receive narcotic medication have the potential to be impacted. 3. Measures put into place/systematic changes to ensure the deficient practice does not recur: V2 and V4 provided in-service training on 2/9/2024 to nursing staff, (narcotic medications and medications refill). 4. Plan to monitor performance to ensure solutions are sustained: Narcotic medication audits to be conducted weekly x 4 weeks by V2 & V4. The first complete facility audit was completed on 2/13/2024.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ordered pain medication was refilled in a timely manner for ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ordered pain medication was refilled in a timely manner for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. This past noncompliance occurred between 2/05/2024 - 2/09/2024. Findings: R1's face sheet documents a facility admission date of 4/19/2023 with diagnoses of Chronic Kidney disease, Stage 3 Unspecified, Malignant neoplasm of uterus, part unspecified, other intervertebral disc degeneration, lumbar region, unspecified osteoarthritis, unspecified site, other sleep apnea. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating R1 is cognitively intact; Section J, Pain Management, documents R1 has a scheduled pain medication regimen. R1's Physician's Orders dated 4/19/2023 documents Acetaminophen 500mg (2 tabs) every 4 hours as needed for pain; 4/21/2023 documents Percocet 5/325mg three times a day for pain (Unspecified Osteoarthritis, Unspecified site; Other Intervertebral disc degeneration, lumbar region); 2/6/2024 documents Hydrocodone 5/325mg every 8 hours as needed for pain (may substitute if Percocet is unavailable). R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated February 1 - 29, 2024 documents Percocet 5/325mg not given on 2/5/2024 (9:00 PM); 2/6/2024 (5:00 AM, 1:00 PM, 9:00 PM) and 2/07/2024 (1:00 AM). R1's Narcotic Administration Sheet for Percocet 5/325mg documents last dose given on 2/5/2024 at 1:00 PM and documentation of Percocet 5/325mg received on 2/7/2024 (30 tabs) and next dose given on 2/7/2024 at 12:30 PM. R1's Progress Notes dated 2/06/2024, 6:00 PM (Late Entry) by V4 (Quality Assurance/Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) documents in part .R1 came to this nurse and spoke about being out of her pain pills .asked R1 if she was having pain and R1 stated she was and had been to a doctor's appointment .told R1 a nurse sent a script to V20 (Primary NP), Monday (2/5/2024) to get signed .it came back Tuesday morning (2/6/2024) that it didn't have quantity amount or DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration) number on it .so V20 was going to escribe it to pharmacy .I told R1 that hopefully it would come in on the delivery we would get Tuesday night . When pharmacy delivered Tuesday evening around 10:30 PM, did not have R1's pain medication. R1's Progress Notes dated 2/07/2024, 11:58 AM, document in part .med delivery guy had been there and delivered R1's pain medications. On 2/14/2024 at 12:30 PM, R1 stated last week either Sunday or Monday evening, the nurse came in and told me that I was out of my regular pain medication. R1 stated they told her a new nurse forgot to reorder it. R1 stated that the nurse told her that it probably wouldn't be here until tomorrow night. R1 stated that she was not offered any other type of pain medication until the following day. R1 stated that she has arthritis in her shoulders, back, and has had multiple knee replacements. R1 stated that she didn't get any sleep for three nights after missing her regularly scheduled pain medication and her pain was unbearable in her shoulders, back, and knees. R1 stated that she has been on scheduled Percocet for over twenty years and that is the only medication that helps to relieve her pain. On 2/14/2024, at 1:10 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that R1's Percocet medication is not in the facility's emergency medication kit (E-Kit). V2 stated that it is the expectation of her nurses to have any medication that needs to be refilled, to be refilled in a timely manner before the medication runs out. V2 stated that it is the expectation of the nurses to call the primary physician when a medication runs out and get it refilled as soon as possible or get another order for an alternative medication to be given. V2 stated that R1 did get offered an alternative medication on 2/6/2024 and on 2/7/2024. V2 stated that an in-service training for all the nurses on narcotic medications and medication refills was given on 2/9/2024. V2 stated that she and V4 (Quality Assurance/LPN) are completing weekly audits to see if they need to get any scripts for narcotic medications refilled. On 2/14/2024, at 1:25 PM, V6 (Ombudsman) stated that V19 (Family) contacted her and told her that R1 ran out of her pain medication. V6 stated that she called R1 and R1 stated to her that she had not received her pain medication for 24 hours. V6 stated that R1 told her that she had been on regularly scheduled Percocet for over 20 years and that is the only pain medication that works for her. V6 stated that she offered R1 a grievance form to fill out. V6 stated that she spoke with V1 (Administrator) and was told R1 was offered an alternative medication but that she refused. V6 stated that V1 verified to her that R1's Percocet was not in the facility's emergency medication kit. V6 stated that V1 verified to her that R1 had missed 5-6 doses of her Percocet medication. V6 stated that V1 told her that R1's Percocet did arrive on 2/7/2024 and that the facility is monitoring to make sure this doesn't happen again. On 2/14/2024 at 1:40 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated that he spoke with V6 (Ombudsman) and told her that R1 ran out of her pain medication and that a back-up alternative was offered and given. V1 stated that R1's Percocet was ordered on 2/5/24 & 2/6/24 and received on 2/7/2024. V1 stated that an in-service for all nurses on narcotic medications and medication refills was given on 2/9/2024. V1 stated that V2 (DON) and V4 (Quality Assurance/LPN) are completing weekly audits to see if they need to get any scripts for narcotic medications refilled. On 2/14/2024 at 2:00 PM, the emergency medication kit was observed to have no Percocet available. There was hydrocodone 5/325mg available in the emergency medication kit. On 2/14/2024 at 3:05 PM, V9 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated that she works 6:00 AM - 6:00 PM regularly and she worked on 2/5/2024, day shift. V9 stated that she was told in report by V5 (RN) that R1 had one Percocet pill left and that it would need to be reordered. V9 stated that she called V20 (Primary Nurse Practitioner) and told her that a new script was needed for R1's Percocet medication. V9 stated that she gave R1 her last dose of Percocet at 1:00 PM on 2/5/2024. V9 stated that she told V5 (RN) in report that R1's Percocet medication was supposed to come in that evening. On 2/14/2024 at 3:10 PM, V5 (RN) stated that she worked Sunday night, 2/4/2024, and noticed that R1 only had one dose of Percocet left after she gave R1 her regularly scheduled 5:00 AM dose. V5 stated that she did not notify the primary physician at that time, just told V9 (RN) that R1 only had one dose of Percocet left and it needed to be reordered. V5 stated that she has been in-serviced on medication refills and has been closely monitoring when medications need to be reordered and refilled. On 2/15/2024 at 10:00 AM, V2 (DON) and V4 (Quality Assurance/LPN) both stated that they are doing weekly audits on checking the narcotic book weekly to see if any new scripts for narcotic medications need to be reordered. Both stated that the nursing staff have been in-serviced, (2/9/2024), on medication refills and that all the nurses know how to use the (name of medication dispensing system). Both stated that the first weekly audit for narcotic medication refill was completed on 2/13/2024 with no concerns noted. Both stated that the facility is trying to implement different pain medications to be added to the (name of medication dispensing system) as well. On 2/20/2024 at 8:10 AM, V10 (RN) stated that she worked on 2/6/2024 and R1 was out of her Percocet medication. V10 stated that she called V20 (Primary Nurse Practitioner/NP) and got an alternative medication (Hydrocodone 5/325mg) ordered for her until the Percocet would come in from the pharmacy. V10 stated that she offered Tylenol to R1 but R1 refused stating, That will not work for me and V10 stated she offered the hydrocodone to her and R1 refused the first time, stating, Those will not work for me, I threw 120 tablets away because that medication would not work for me. V10 stated that she talked to R1 and explained to her that hydrocodone was equivalent to Percocet and R1 finally agreed to take a dose of it. V10 stated that R1 was experiencing more pain than usual that day. V10 stated that R1's Percocet was supposed to arrive from pharmacy later that evening. V10 stated that she has been in-serviced on medication refills and she has been closely monitoring when medications need to be reordered. On 2/20/2024 at 8:20 AM, V11 (LPN) stated that she worked on 2/6/2024, the night shift and was told in report that R1 was out of her Percocet medication and that hydrocodone could be given as needed until her Percocet medication could be delivered from pharmacy. V11 stated that R1's Percocet medication was supposed to arrive to the facility on 2/6/2024 but did not show up that evening. V11 stated that she called the pharmacy and they told her that it would arrive on the next pharmacy delivery, which would be in the morning. V11 stated that she administered the hydrocodone as ordered for R1 when she was able to have it. V11 stated that she has been in-serviced on medication refills and has been monitoring closely when medications need reordered. On 2/20/2024 at 8:40 AM, V20 (Primary Nurse Practitioner) stated that she was notified on 2/5/2024 that R1 needed her Percocet re-ordered. V20 stated that she reordered R1's Percocet that day but it was sent to the wrong pharmacy. V20 stated that she received another phone call on 2/6/2024 regarding R1 needing her Percocet reordered. V20 stated that when she went into the computer to order it again on 2/6/2024, she noticed she had sent the initial Percocet order to the wrong pharmacy. V20 stated that she reordered the Percocet again as well as ordered an alternative pain medication, hydrocodone 5/325mg that could be given as needed until the Percocet became available. V20 stated that it is her expectation for the nurses to notify her in a timely manner to refill medications and not wait until residents run out of medications. The facility's pharmacy policy dated 8/2020 documents in part .Procedures: Elements of Controlled Substance Prescription: 6. Quantity Prescribed; 11. Name, address, and DEA registration number of the prescriber .Ordering medications from the pharmacy: 2. Repeat medications (refills) are written on a medication reorder form or by peeling the reorder tab from the prescription label and placing it in the appropriate area on the medication reorder form provided by the pharmacy for that purpose, or requested via the facility's electronic health record (EHR) system and ordered as follows: a. Reorder medications based on the estimated refill date ([NAME]), on the pharmacy Rx label, or at least three days in advance, to ensure an adequate supply is on hand. When ordering medication that requires special processing, order at least seven days in advance of need; b. The refill order is called in, faxed, sent electronically, or otherwise transmitted to the pharmacy. When available and legible, the pharmacy label (including bar code) is pulled and transmitted to the pharmacy. The facility's concern/compliment form dated 2/7/2024 documents being filled out by R1 stating: I have to have my pain med regularly; I got my evening med and the nurse told me we were out of percocet and she would check to see if they were ordered; I didn't get my pain med until 2/7/2024 at noon; A very painful 2 days and nights. On 2/15/2024, at 10:30 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated that the facility had a Quality Assurance (QA) meeting on 2/9/2024 to discuss narcotic medications and medication refills. V1 stated the following people attended the QA meeting: V1 (Administrator), V2 (Director of Nursing), V4 (Quality Assurance/LPN), V16 (LPN/MDS/Care Plan Coordinator). V1 stated the measure put in place to ensure that deficient practice does not recur are: V2 (DON) and V4 (QA/LPN) will be checking narcotic books weekly (Tuesday) to see if the facility needs to get any scripts for narcotic medication refills to ensure that they don't run out of any narcotic medications. On 2/14/2024, V1 (Administrator) provided their QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) Ad Hoc Form outlining the actions taken by the facility prior to the survey date to correct the noncompliance. Prior to the survey date, the facility took the following actions to correct the non-compliance: 1. A Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting was held on 2/09/2024. In attendance - V1, V2, V4, and V16. 2. Process/Steps to identify others having the potential to be impacted by the same deficient practice: All residents who receive narcotic medication have the potential to be impacted. 3. Measures put into place/systematic changes to ensure the deficient practice does not recur: V2 and V4 provided in-service training on 2/9/2024 to nursing staff, (narcotic medications and medications refill). 4. Plan to monitor performance to ensure solutions are sustained: Narcotic medication audits to be conducted weekly x 4 weeks by V2 & V4. The first complete facility audit was completed on 2/13/2024.
Sept 2023 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete weekly skin assessments, implement interventi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete weekly skin assessments, implement interventions to reduce pressure, and complete readmission assessments to identify any skin changes for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for being at risk for pressure injury in the sample of 3. This failure resulted in R1 developing pressure wounds. Findings include: 1. R1's face sheet documented an admission date of 6/15/23 and diagnoses including: chronic kidney disease, hypertension, dementia, hyperkalemia. R1's 9/15/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R1's 9/15/23 MDS documented R1 required extensive two person assist with bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, dressing, and personal hygiene. R1's 7/3/23 Braden Observation documented a score of 18, indicating R1 was at risk for pressure wounds. R1's 9/15/23 Skin & Wound Evaluation documented a deep tissue injury related to pressure that was in-house acquired on the right lateral forefoot measuring 5.2 centimeters (cm) x 3.5 cm, a deep tissue injury related to pressure that was present on admission to the rear right malleolus (heel of the foot) measuring 5.6 cm x 4.7 cm, and a deep tissue injury related to pressure that was present on admission on the rear left malleolus measuring 5.64 cm x 4.21 cm. R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 was transferred to the hospital on 9/10/23 and returned from the hospital on 9/14/23 at 7:40 PM. A progress note dated 9/14/23 at 7:40 PM documents that R1 returned to the facility with a new order for a daily dressing to the left heel. There was no readmission assessment documenting any skin conditions or wounds to R1's left heel. On 9/19/23 at 10:21 AM, R1 was lying in bed watching television. R1's bilateral heels were wrapped in kerlix dated 9/19/23. R1 was not interviewable and refused to have bandages removed. On 9/19/23 at 12:52 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/ DON) said on 9/15/23 she went into R1's room to administer Intravenous antibiotics and while repositioning R1 noticed the wounds on R1's bilateral heels and side of the right foot. V2 said R1 had returned from the hospital on 9/14/23 and may have had the pressure wounds on admission but no readmission assessment was completed to document any skin conditions. V2 said all residents should have a skin assessment on admission or readmission. On 9/19/23 at 12:30 PM, V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant/ CNA) said R1 had large blisters on R1's bilateral heels 3-4 days or maybe a week prior to 9/10/23 when R1 was transferred to the hospital. V4 said she did report the blisters to the nurse but was unsure of who the nurse was or on what day she reported it. On 9/20/23 at 11:32 AM, V9 (CNA) said she noticed R1's bilateral heels to be black prior to 9/10/23 and reported it to 2 or 3 nurses but was unsure who. V9 said she was working on 9/14/23 when R1 returned to the facility from the hospital. V9 said R1's bilateral heels were black and looked really bad. V9 said she reported R1's skin changes to V8 (RN) on 9/14/23. On 9/20/23 at 11:27 AM, V8 (RN) said she did not recall R1. V8 said she did not work on R1's unit often and did not know the resident's names. V8 said she no longer was employed at the facility. On 9/20/23 at 11:38 AM, V10 (CNA) said she noticed one of R1's heels to black and nasty looking prior to 9/10/23. V10 said she had reported it to the nurse and thought the nurse was V6 (LPN). On 9/19/23 at 10:31 AM, V6 (LPN) said he was not aware of R1 having any pressure wounds prior to R1's 9/10/23 hospitalization. On 9/19/23 at 11:52 PM, V5 (Wound Nurse/ Registered Nurse/ RN) said she worked in the facility one day a week and would complete the wound documentation and take pictures of resident wounds. V5 said she had assessed R1's pressure wounds earlier in the day on 9/19/23. V5 said R1's right lateral foot pressure wound was closed and was a dark purple color measuring 5.59 cm x 3.83 cm, R1's right heel malleolus pressure wound measured 7.04 cm x 4.9 cm with 75% eschar and 25% of the wound bed being pink open tissue, and R1's left heel malleolus pressure wound measured 5.52 cm x 3.31 cm with 75% eschar and 25% of the wound bed being pink open tissue. V5 provided the pictures of R1's wounds on the wound treatment cell phone. R1's EMR documented a 9/15/23 care plan I have a pressure ulcer r/t (related to) disease process no previous care plan for pressure was documented. On 9/19/23 at 1:43 PM, V3 (Care Plan and MDS Coordinator/ LPN) said R1 had a Braden score of 18 indicating R1 was at risk for a pressure wound and should have had a care plan in place for being at risk for impaired skin integrity. V3 said he was unsure why R1 did not have a care plan in place prior to developing pressure wounds. V3 said he must have overlooked R1's need for a care plan for pressure to be implemented. On 9/19/23 at 12:52 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said any resident with a Braden score documenting a resident is at risk for a pressure wound should have a care plan with interventions to off load pressure. On 9/19/23 at 11:52 AM, V5 (Wound Nurse/ RN) said interventions for off-loading pressure would be found in a resident's care plan. V5 said she would expect any resident who was at risk for pressure wounds to have a care plan with interventions such as repositioning every 2 hours, floating a resident's heels while in bed, and wedges or pillows for positioning. On 9/19/23 at 10:31 AM, V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse/ LPN) said he was unsure what interventions R1 had in place to off-load pressure. V6 said for off-loading pressure all residents should be assisted to reposition every 2 hours. R1's EMR documented R1 requiring weekly skin assessments. R1's EMR documented a Weekly Skin Observation on 6/22/23, 6/29/23, 7/6/23, 7/13/23, 8/4/23 (23 days later), 8/11/23, 8/18/23, 9/1/23 (14 days later). The last documented skin assessment completed before R1's hospital admission on [DATE] was dated 9/1/23. The 9/1/23 weekly skin assessment documents that R1 had a blister to the left sole, ball of the foot that is blistered and scabbed over. R1's 9/1/23 assessment further documents no for the question Are any of these foot concerns new? There is no other documentation in the progress notes or physician's orders regarding a wound, or treatment to the wound, on the left heel prior to R1's 9/1/23 assessment. On 9/19/23 at 12:52 PM, V2 (DON) said the Weekly Skin Observations were automatically generated in the EMR and was unsure why they were not completed on R1. V2 said the Weekly Skin Observations were completed to assure new skin changes would be identified, documented, and treated. On 9/20/23 at 4:37 PM V11 (Physician) said if the facility had interventions in place to off-load pressure R1's pressure wounds could have been avoidable. The facility's 6/8/18 Skin Condition Assessment & Monitoring - Pressure and Non- Pressure policy documented . A skin condition assessment and pressure ulcer risk assessment (Braden) will be completed at the time of admission/ readmission. The pressure ulcer risk assessment will be updated quarterly and as necessary. Residents identified will have a weekly skin assessment by a licensed nurse. A wound assessment will be initiated and documented in the resident chart when pressure and/ or other non- pressure skin conditions are identified by a licensed nurse . The resident's care plan will be revised as appropriate, to reflect alteration of skin integrity, approaches and goals for care .
Jun 2023 12 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were kept within reach for 1 of 24 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were kept within reach for 1 of 24 (R22) residents reviewed for call lights in the sample of 69. Findings Include: R22's Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include heart disease, heart failure, diabetes, and unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility. R22's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 5/8/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 10, which indicates R22 has a moderate cognitive deficit. This same MDS documents under Section G, R22 requires two person physical assistance for transfers. R22's current undated Care Plan documents a care area of ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit. This care area includes the following interventions, I require a (mechanical lift) with 2 staff assistance for transfers, and Encourage me to use the bell call for assistance. On 06/20/23 at 1:33 PM, R22 was observed sitting in her wheelchair in her room. R22 stated staff had brought her to her room when she finished lunch and she asked to be transferred to the bed. R22 stated they told her they would be back and she is still waiting to go to bed. When asked if she had a working call light R22 stated, I can't reach it. R22's call light was observed behind the resident on the night stand, approximately 3 feet from resident. On 6/23/23 at 11:01 AM, V2 (Director of Nurses) stated she would expect call lights to be kept within reach of the residents. The facility Call Light policy dated 11/28/12 documents .1. All residents that have the ability to use a call light shall have the nurse call light system available at all times and within easy accessibility to the resident at the bedside or other reasonable accessible location .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the temperatures of the rooms were kept within ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the temperatures of the rooms were kept within a comfortable temperature range for 2 of 4 (R15 and R25) residents reviewed for temperatures in a sample of 69. Findings Include: 1. R25's facility Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, shortness of breath, diabetes, hypertension, and morbid obesity. R25's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 5/17/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13, which indicates R25 is cognitively intact. On 6/20/23 at 1:50 PM, V18 (Maintenance Director) stated the room temperatures should be less than 80 degrees. V18 stated the air conditioner motors are out (not working) in a few of the rooms. V18 stated they were monitoring the rooms the best they could and encouraging the residents to spend time out of the rooms. V18 stated the motors were out in R15's room, R25's room, as well as an empty room. On 6/21/23 at 2:50 PM, observed R25's room to be warm, window open, the air conditioner was not on, and what appeared to be white towels with brown water stains on them shoved under the air conditioner wall unit. V18 arrived and checked the temperature of the room. The thermometer read 81.1 degrees Fahrenheit with 49% humidity. When asked how long R25's air conditioner had not been working, V18 stated not very long. When asked if there was a work order for the unit, V18 stated he doesn't usually get work orders. When asked if they had checked the rest of the rooms in the facility to ensure all of the other units were in working order, V18 stated they had not. When asked if they had been monitoring the temperatures of the rooms they knew the units were not working in, V18 stated he was not aware they had a thermometer that could check the room temperature. V18 stated he knew they were being checked by someone one because he had been told they were in compliance. V18 would not say who told him they were in compliance or who was monitoring the temperatures. When asked about the motors for the rooms the units were not working in, V18 stated they had not been ordered. V18 stated he became aware the units weren't working about three weeks ago. V18 stated he didn't know why the motors hadn't been ordered. V18 stated he had told V1 (Administrator) about them and guessed maybe there was some miscommunication. On 6/21/23 at 3:16 PM, R25 was observed sitting in the common area and stated the temperature in his room has been hot since he came off quarantine. R25 stated if the window isn't left open it gets too hot in there. On 06/21/23 at 3:54 PM, VI (Administrator) stated they did not have any temperature logs to document temperatures were checked prior to 6/21/23. 2. On 06/20/23 at 1:55 PM, R15 reported that the air conditioner (AC) in her room had not been working for about 3 weeks. R15 stated she had been told by management a part had been ordered to repair the unit. R15's room was noticeably hot in spite of a floor fan oscillating around the room. On 06/21/23 at 10:17 AM, R15 was resting in bed wearing only a t-shirt and underwear. The room was uncomfortably hot and when asked how the temperature was in her room, R15 stated, I'm burning up. R15 stated she was going to ask V1 (Administrator) to see if a part from an AC unit of an empty room could be used in her unit until the part on order came in. On 06/21/23 at 2:00 PM, V18 (Maintenance) stated there were a couple of motors in the maintenance area that he would change out in the AC units not working. On 06/22/23 at 2:30 PM, a local AC repair company was in the facility entering R15's room. On 06/23/23 at 10:15 AM, V18 stated the AC company was not able to repair R15's unit. V18 confirmed the part had been ordered but was not able to provide a time frame in which R15's AC unit would be repaired. When asked about using a part from an empty room, V18 stated he checked and the AC units in the empty rooms did not work.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 (R31) of 2...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 (R31) of 2 residents reviewed for abuse in a sample of 69. The findings include: On 06/21/23 at 11:32 AM, R31 was in the dining room during lunch time. Noted was a very large raised, non-uniform scaly growth on the top of his forehead/head area. R31 was also observed in the hallway throughout this day propelling in his wheelchair and does not appear to be in any distress or discomfort. On 06/22/23 at 10:00 AM, the top of R31's forehead/head previously observed to have a large growth was now covered with a large bandage that was blood soaked. When asked what happened to R31's head, V11 (Licensed Practical Nurse - LPN) stated R60 hit him with a walker last evening. V11 stated she had become aware of this when reading the nursing communication documentation when starting her shift that morning. V11 stated there were also notes in each resident's record. R60's Face Sheet documents admission to this facility on 11/14/22 with diagnoses to include - Bipolar disease, and schizoaffective disorder. R60's most recent quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 8, indicating R60 is moderately cognitively impaired. R60's progress note dated 06/21/23 at 11:15 PM by V25 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) includes - Note Text: Resident's behavior/mood noted at times. Resident's behavior noted as was verbally aggressive was physically aggressive. Other resident specific behaviors not noted above: Resident verbally aggressive to peer in hallway, when peer approached resident side in w/c (wheelchair) this resident lifted walked (sic - walker) and hit peer on top of head with walker. Peer was not bothering this resident when altercation occurred. Behavior triggers: Loud Noises/Congested area. Resident specific behavior triggers not otherwise specified: Description of resident mood: Displayed anger w (with)/self/others. Location of occurrence: Hallway. Interventions: Custom interventions attempted: Residents separated for safety. Resident response to interventions: Accepted: Calmed down. Duration of behavior: 3 minutes. Other duration not otherwise specified. Outcome: Improved. R31's Face Sheet documents admission to this facility on 03/02/20 with diagnoses to include Parkinson's disease, schizoaffective disorder, and seizures. R31's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating he is severely cognitively impaired. R31's Physician Order Summary Report includes a new order dated 06/22/23 as follows - Cleanse area top of head with wound cleanser, apply dry drsg (dressing) QD (every day) and PRN (as needed) until healed. R31's Pain-Comprehensive Observation dated 06/21/23 at 11:26 PM by V25 included - A0. Level of pain. 1. Painad Scale: Hurts even more. A. Location of Pain, c. other: Top of head. B. Pain diagnosis. Condition r/t (related to) pain. c. Comments. Skin tag/cancer on top of head bumped when hit and is bleeding. The rest of the form is blank. R31's Skin Report dated 6/21/23 at 11:30 PM by V25 included - Type of Assessment: New Skin Concern. Type of Skin Concern: a.13. Other-see below. b. Other/Comments: Skin tag/cancer top of head bumped when hit and is bleeding. Location: List site, type, description and measurement for each area: B1. Location Site: Top of Scalp. Description: Skin tag/cancer top of head bumped and dry dressing applied. B3. For each area, list description/signs of infection/status (improved, worsening, healed): Area clean and dry no sx (symptoms) of infection noted. C. Treatment/Pain Assessment: 1. List treatment for each area (if applicable). Cleansed with wound cleanser, apply dry dressing qd and PRN until healed. 2. Any complaints of pain? No. D. Notifications: Was there a new skin concern or change in skin condition that required physician notification? Yes. 2. Date MD (medical doctor) was notified of new condition/status update: 06/21/23. 3. Date Family/ Responsible Party was notified of new area/status update: 06/22/23. On 06/22/23 at 11:00 AM, requested from V1 (Administrator) the initial investigative report regarding R31 and R60's incident the occurred on 06/21/23 at 11:10 PM/11:15 PM. On 06/22/23 at 1:00 PM, again asked V1 for the initial investigative report for R31 and R60. V1 stated he thought was referring to a fall investigation and confirmed he had not started an initial investigation regarding R60 hitting R31 over the head with his walker. When asked if he received a call on 6/21/23 or 6/22/23 soon after the incident occurred, V1 checked his cell phone and confirmed he did not. V1 followed up with saying that he gets so many calls that he deletes them and perhaps deleted the call. V1 stated he would go and write the initial report and send it to IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) now. On 06/23/23 at 9:00 AM, R31 was in the hallway in wheelchair self-propelling. Blood could be seen through the bandage covering his recent injury to the forehead/head area. On 06/23/23 at 9:01 AM, V24 (State Guardian) stated he pulled a message from the answer service the morning of 06/22/23 that reported an incident with R31 but reported there were no injuries. On 06/23/23 at 10:06 AM, V26 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) removed R31's bandage from his head to reveal a large open wound to the top forehead/head where the raised growth seen the previous day was now completely gone. When asked if his head hurt from where he was hit with a walker, R31 became animated with his arms and mimicked hitting, touched his head, and stated, Yeah off and on. On 06/23/23 at 10:11 AM, V25 recalled the incident between R60 and R31. V25 stated the evening of 06/21/23 at about 11:00 PM or 11:15 PM, she was down the hall with another resident when she heard a commotion behind her. V25 stated when she turned around she saw R60 with his walker in the air. V22 (CNA) who witnessed the incident told her R60 hit R31 on the head a couple of times with his walker. V25 stated she did call V1 on 06/22/23 at 12:45 AM to report the incident, but he did not answer the phone. When asked if she called anyone else in the facility, she stated she did not. V25 stated she notified V24 and left a message on the answering service reporting the incident. When asked if R31 sustained any injuries from being struck in the head with a walker, V25 stated he did not. When asked why there were treatment orders if there was no injury, V25 stated he just had a scratch that bled. When this surveyor stated she observed R31's growth to his head to have been completely gone and the bandage had visible blood soaking through, V25 stated, There was a skin cancer spot on his head that was knocked off. I guess that would be an injury. On 06/23/23 at 11:00 AM, V1 presented the following initial report with a fax confirmation the IDPH office received his report - An initial facility Report to IDPH Regional Office dated 06/22/23 at 2:30 PM includes - Date of Incident/Accident: 06/22/23. Time of Occurrence: 2:30 PM. Resident Name: (Names of R31 and R60). date of birth : 05/31/19 (sic). Diagnosis: (R31) - Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with no other behavior disturbance. (R60) - Bipolar disorder, current episode depressed, mild or moderate severity, unspecified. Description of Occurrence: Resident reported allegation of resident making contact. Injuries: Resident assessed by licensed staff with scratch to top of head and no mental anguish noted. Actions Taken: Administrator immediately notified. Investigation initiated. Follow-up report will be sent. Resident Representative/Family Notified: (R60) notified. V24 (State Guardian) notified. V15 (Physician) notified. emergency room Visit Only: No. Hospitalization: No. Has an investigation been initiated. Yes. Have immediate safety needs been met? Yes. Completed by: V1 (Administrator) on 06/22/23. A fax confirmation sheet provided by V1 documents the initial incident report was sent to IDPH on 06/22/23 at 3:30 PM and was received. On 06/23/23 at 11:17 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) was asked if R31 sustained an injury to his head after being hit with a walker by R60. Initially, she said no. However, when asked if she would consider R31's growth on his head being knocked off, bleeding, requiring treatment orders and treatment, and is now covered with a large bandage, V2 stated she would consider that as being an injury and did not know why R31 was reported to have no injuries. On 06/23/23 at 3:30 PM, V22 (CNA) had not returned call for an interview. The facility Abuse Prevention and Reporting - Illinois policy dated 11/28/16 includes - Guidelines: The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. Definitions: Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, mental abuse. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to immediately report a resident-to-resident altercation ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to immediately report a resident-to-resident altercation to the Administrator or designee for 1 (R31) of 2 residents reviewed for abuse reporting in a sample of 69. The findings include: R31's Face Sheet documents admission to this facility on 03/02/20 with diagnoses to include Parkinson's disease, schizoaffective disorder, and seizures. R31's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating he is severely cognitively impaired. On 06/21/23 at 11:32 AM, R31 was in the dining room during lunch time. Noted was a very large raised, non-uniform scaly growth on the top of his forehead/head area. R31 was also observed in the hallway throughout this day propelling in his wheelchair and does not appear to be in any distress or discomfort. On 06/22/23 at 10:00 AM, the top of R31's forehead/head previously observed to have a large growth was now covered with a large bandage that was blood soaked. When asked what happened to R31's head, V11 (Licensed Practical Nurse - LPN) stated R60 hit him with a walker last evening. V11 stated she had become aware of this when reading the nursing communication documentation when starting her shift that morning. V11 stated there were also notes in each resident's record. R60's Face Sheet documents admission to this facility on 11/14/22 with diagnoses to include - Bipolar disease, and schizoaffective disorder. R60's most recent quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 8, indicating R60 is moderately cognitively impaired. R60's progress note dated 06/21/23 at 11:15 PM by V25 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) includes - Note Text: Resident's behavior/mood noted at times. Resident's behavior noted as was verbally aggressive was physically aggressive. Other resident specific behaviors not noted above: Resident verbally aggressive to peer in hallway, when peer approached resident side in w/c (wheelchair) this resident lifted walked (sic - walker) and hit peer on top of head with walker. Peer was not bothering this resident when altercation occurred. Behavior triggers: Loud Noises/Congested area. Resident specific behavior triggers not otherwise specified: Description of resident mood: Displayed anger w (with)/self/others. Location of occurrence: Hallway. Interventions: Custom interventions attempted: Residents separated for safety. Resident response to interventions: Accepted: Calmed down. Duration of behavior: 3 minutes. Other duration not otherwise specified. Outcome: Improved. R31's Pain-Comprehensive Observation dated 06/21/23 at 11:26 PM by V25 included - A0. Level of pain. 1. Painad Scale: Hurts even more. A. Location of Pain, c. other: Top of head. B. Pain diagnosis. Condition r/t (related to) pain. c. Comments. Skin tag/cancer on top of head bumped when hit and is bleeding. The rest of the form is blank. R31's Skin Report dated 6/21/23 at 11:30 PM by V25 included - Type of Assessment: New Skin Concern. Type of Skin Concern: a.13. Other-see below. b. Other/Comments: Skin tag/cancer top of head bumped when hit and is bleeding. Location: List site, type, description and measurement for each area: B1. Location Site: Top of Scalp. Description: Skin tag/cancer top of head bumped and dry dressing applied. B3. For each area, list description/signs of infection/status (improved, worsening, healed): Area clean and dry no sx (symptoms) of infection noted. C. Treatment/Pain Assessment: 1. List treatment for each area (if applicable). Cleansed with wound cleanser, apply dry dressing qd and PRN until healed. 2. Any complaints of pain? No. D. Notifications: Was there a new skin concern or change in skin condition that required physician notification? Yes. 2. Date MD (medical doctor) was notified of new condition/status update: 06/21/23. 3. Date Family/ Responsible Party was notified of new area/status update: 06/22/23. R31's Physician Order Summary Report includes a new order dated 06/22/23 as follows - Cleanse area top of head with wound cleanser, apply dry drsg (dressing) QD (every day) and PRN (as needed) until healed. On 06/22/23 at 11:00 AM, requested from V1 (Administrator) the initial investigative report regarding R31 and R60's incident the occurred on 06/21/23 at 11:10 PM/11:15 PM. On 06/22/23 at 1:00 PM, again asked V1 for the initial investigative report for R31 and R60. V1 stated he thought was referring to a fall investigation and confirmed he had not started an initial investigation regarding R60 hitting R31 over the head with his walker. When asked if he received a call on 6/21/23 or 6/22/23 soon after the incident occurred, V1 checked his cell phone and confirmed he did not. V1 followed up with saying that he gets so many calls that he deletes them and perhaps deleted the call. V1 stated he would go and write the initial report and send it to IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) now. On 06/23/23 at 10:11 AM, V25 recalled the incident between R60 and R31. V25 stated the evening of 06/21/23 at about 11:00 PM or 11:15 PM, she was down the hall with another resident when she heard a commotion behind her. V25 stated when she turned around, she saw R60 with his walker in the air. V22 (CNA) who witnessed the incident told her R60 hit R31 on the head a couple of times with his walker. V25 stated she did call V1 on 06/22/23 at 12:45 AM to report the incident, but he did not answer the phone. When asked if she called anyone else in the facility, she stated she did not. V25 stated she notified V24 (State Guardian) and left a message on the answering service reporting the incident. On 06/23/23 at 11:00 AM, V1 presented the following initial report with a fax confirmation the IDPH office received his report - An initial facility Report to IDPH Regional Office dated 06/22/23 at 2:30 PM includes - Date of Incident/Accident: 06/22/23. Time of Occurrence: 2:30 PM. Resident Name: (Names of R31 and R60). date of birth : 05/31/19 (sic). Diagnosis: (R31) - Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with no other behavior disturbance. (R60) - Bipolar disorder, current episode depressed, mild or moderate severity, unspecified. Description of Occurrence: Resident reported allegation of resident making contact. Injuries: Resident assessed by licensed staff with scratch to top of head and no mental anguish noted. Actions Taken: Administrator immediately notified. Investigation initiated. Follow-up report will be sent. Resident Representative/Family Notified: (R60) notified. V24 (State Guardian) notified. V15 (Physician) notified. emergency room Visit Only: No. Hospitalization: No. Has an investigation been initiated. Yes. Have immediate safety needs been met? Yes. Completed by: V1 (Administrator) on 06/22/23. A fax confirmation sheet provided by V1 documents the initial incident report was sent to IDPH on 06/22/23 at 3:30 PM and was received. On 06/23/23 at 11:17 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing - DON) confirmed she was not notified of the incident between R31 and R60 on 06/21/23 and stated V25 should have followed the chain of command in reporting abuse and notified her when V1 was unable to be reached. The facility Abuse Prevention and Reporting - Illinois policy dated 11/28/16 includes - Guidelines: The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation . Definitions: Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, mental abuse . Willful, as used in this definition of abuse means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. Employees are required to report any incident, allegation, or suspicion of potential abuse. to the administrator immediately, or to an immediate supervisor who must then report to the administrator immediately. In the absence of the administrator, reporting can be made to an individual who has been designated to act as administrator in the administrator's absence. Upon learning of the report, the administrator or a designee shall initiate an incident investigation. Internal Investigation: Any incident or allegation involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property will result in an investigation. Investigation Procedures: The appointed investigator will, at a minimum, attempt to interview the person who reported the incident, anyone likely to have direct knowledge of the incident and the resident, if interviewable. Any written statements that have been submitted will be reviewed, along with any pertinent medical records or other documents.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor oxygen saturation levels as ordered by the physician for 1 (R70) of 1 residents in a sample of 16 reviewed for for oxygen saturatio...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor oxygen saturation levels as ordered by the physician for 1 (R70) of 1 residents in a sample of 16 reviewed for for oxygen saturation. The Findings Include: R70's admission record documents a date of birth as 4/17/91 and an admission date of 5/22/23. R70's order summary report dated with active orders for May of 2023 lists that oxygen saturation be monitored every day and night shift. This same report includes the following diagnosis: down syndrome, unspecified asthma, unspecified intellectual disabilities, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and pneumonia due to other streptococci. R70's weight and vital summary report during the length of his stay from 5/23/23 to a discharge date of 5/25/23 have no oxygen saturation levels documented. No oxygen saturation levels were documented in the nursing progress notes. On 6/22/23 at 1:30 PM, V1 (Administrator) confirmed that he was unable to find any documentation of oxygen saturations in the medical chart. On 6/23/23 at 1:00 PM, V15 (Physician) stated that he expects the nursing staff to monitor oxygen levels of residents as ordered by the physicians. On 6/23/23 at 2:00 PM, V16 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) stated that he likely just forgot to write down/chart R70's oxygen levels in the chart because he is still learning the electronic medical record system. On 6/23/23 at 2:30 PM, V11 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated that the CNA's normally check oxygen levels when they do the vitals but nurses do it as well. If they were taken they would be in the progress notes or the weights/vitals section.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide range of motion (ROM) exercises for 1 (R55) of...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide range of motion (ROM) exercises for 1 (R55) of 1 resident reviewed for ROM in the sample of 69. This failure has the potential to affect 64 residents (R1-R50, R52, R54, R55, R57-R63, R66, R173, R174, R321) who receive ROM exercises. Findings Include: An undated untitled list of all residents who receive restorative programs. This list documents (R1-R50, R52, R54, R55, R57-R63, R66, R321) have current orders for restorative programs. 1. R55's facility Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include muscle spasm, spinal stenosis, and diabetes. R55's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/12/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 10, which indicates R55 has a moderate cognitive impairment. This same MDS under Section G, documents R55 requires assist of two staff for bed mobility, toilet use, and transfers. R55's current undated Care Plan documents a care area of I have limited physical mobility, with interventions that include Nursing Rehab/Restorative: Active ROM program to BLE (bilateral lower extremities) 5-10 reps across all planes twice daily and PRN (as needed) x (times) 7 d/w (days/week). On 06/20/23 at 2:16 PM, R55 stated he wasn't getting therapy and not getting any passive ROM. R55 was observed sitting in his wheelchair and self-propelling it throughout the survey process. R55's POC (Point of Care) Response History with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R55 did not receive ROM exercises on 5/28, 6/5, and 6/16/23 and that R55 received ROM exercises only one time on 5/25, 5/27, 6/1, 6/2, 6/4, 6/6, 6/8, 6/12, 6/14, and 6/17-6/22/23. This same form documents R55 refused ROM exercises on 6/1, 6/16, and 6/20/23. On 06/22/23 at 2:09 PM, V17 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) stated every resident has a walking program, even the residents who require a mechanical lift to transfer. When asked if R55 was capable of walking, V17 stated he didn't know and that R55 had weakness on one side. When asked if he did any exercises with R55, V17 stated just transferring and changing R55, when he needs it. On 06/23/23 at 8:34 AM, V2 (DON/Director of Nurses) stated they have a restorative aid and she knows R55 refuses restorative programs at times. V2 stated if the restorative aid isn't working the CNA's do the restorative programs. On 06/23/23 at 9:56 AM, V19 (Restorative Aid) stated she works four days a week. When asked if she did the restorative programs for all of the residents on the days she worked, V19 stated she was supposed to. When asked if she was able to get them done everyday, V19 stated, Not everyday. V19 stated they are short staffed so she gets pulled to work the floor as a CNA. On 06/23/23 at 9:38 AM, V20 (CNA) stated V19 does the restorative programs with the residents. When asked who does the programs if V19 isn't working, V20 stated, I honestly don't know. V20 stated she thought the CNA's would be responsible. V20 stated when she does R55's restorative program she bends his leg back and forth. V20 stated R55's left side is paralyzed so they help him with that side. On 06/23/23 at 11:01 AM, reviewed with V2 (DON/Director of Nurses) that V19 stated she wasn't always able to do restoratives because she would get pulled to the floor to work as a CNA. V2 stated, It happens sometimes. The facility Restorative Nursing Program dated 11/28/12 documents, Purpose: To promote each resident's ability to maintain or regain the highest degree of independence as safely as possible. All nursing personnel carrying out any of the restorative programs will be trained in the techniques appropriate for that program. Documentation of the interventions and the resident's response will be completed with each implementation.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed and personal protect...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed and personal protective equipment donned per current standards of practice, when providing incontinence care for 1 of 1 (R5) residents reviewed for infection control during incontinence care in the sample of 69. Findings Include: R5's facility Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include diabetes, heart failure, difficulty in walking, Parkinson's Disease, and unspecified intellectual disability. R5's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/25/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 06, which indicates R5 has a severe cognitive deficit. R5's current undated Care Plan documents a Focus area of I have an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit R/T (related to) CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident). The interventions documented for this Focus area include, .Toilet Use: I need extensive assist of 2 staff .Personal Hygiene: I need extensive assist of 2 staff . On 06/22/23 at 3:48 PM, V17 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) was observed assisting R5 after an incontinence episode. V17 assisted R5 to bed, removed the urine soaked pants and brief. V17 removed his gloves and picked up R5's urine soaked pants without donning new gloves or sanitizing his hands. V17 carried the urine soaked pants from R5's room to the soiled utility room. Before exiting the soiled utility room, V17 washed his hands and dried them on his clothes. V17 stated there were no towels available in the soiled utility room to dry his hands on. On 6/23/23 at 9:24 AM, when asked why he carried urine soaked pants without donning gloves from R5's room to the soiled utility room, V17 (CNA), stated he didn't have any bags with him and didn't think about it. V17 stated he dried his hands on his shirt because there were no paper towels available. On 06/22/23 at 4:05 PM, V2 (Director of Nurses/DON) stated she would have expected hand hygiene to be performed per current standards of practice. The facility undated Hand Washing policy documents, .When to wash hands (at a minimum): Before putting on and after taking off gloves Before and after each resident contact After contact with any body fluids. After handing contaminated items According to the Center for Disease Control website https://www.cdc.gov/oralhealth/infectioncontrol/summary-infection-prevention-practices/standard-precautions.html Standard Precautions are the minimum infection prevention practices that apply to all patient care, regardless of suspected or confirmed infection status of the patient, in any setting where health care is delivered Personal protective equipment refers to wearable equipment that is designed to protect . from exposure to or contact with infectious agents Examples of appropriate use of PPE for adherence to Standard Precautions include . Use of gloves in situation involving possible contact with blood or body fluids, mucous membranes, non-intact skin .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Antibiotic Stewardship (Tag F0881)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were prescribed following current standards of pr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were prescribed following current standards of practice for 1 of 1 (R25) residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship in the sample of of 69. Findings Include: R25's facility Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, urinary tract infections, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and overactive bladder. R25's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 5/17/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 13, which indicates R25 is cognitively intact. R25's current undated Care Plan documents a Focus Area of indwelling catheter with diagnosis documented as neurogenic bladder. The same care plan includes interventions to position the catheter bag below the level of the bladder, monitor and document intake and output, monitor for signs/symptoms of discomfort. On 6/21/23 at 10:00 AM, R25 stated the facility staff don't always empty the catheter bag as often as they should but he didn't have any concerns with the way staff clean the insertion site. R25's Order Summary Report Order Date Range 4/1/23 to 6/23/23 documents a physician order for Cipro 500 milligrams (mg) every 12 hours for five days with a start date of 4/6/23 and a stop date of 4/11/23. R25's MAR (Medication Administration Record) dated 4/2023 documents a physician order for Cipro 500 mg every twelve hours that is signed as administered once on 4/6 and 4/10, and twice on 4/7, 4/8, and 4/9/23. R25's local hospital Patient Report dated 4/6/23 documents urinalysis results that include 2 plus leukocytes, positive for nitrites, and two plus blood. R25's Microbiology Report dated 4/6/23 with a report date of 4/8/23 and a fax date of 6/22/23, indicates the report was not sent to the facility. The report documents the bacteria identified in the 4/6/23 urinalysis was Escherichia coli and proteus mirabalis and was resistant to Cipro. This indicates R25 was prescribed an antibiotic the bacteria was resistant to. R25's progress notes document the following on 4/10/23, Narrative: This nurse took new orders for the patient. 04/10/23,1300 D/C (discontinued) Ciprofloxacin HCl Oral Tablet 500 MG (Ciprofloxacin HCl) . There is no other documentation located in R25's progress notes related to the urinalysis and microbiology report. The facility Monthly Infection Log dated April 2023 documents R25 was diagnosed with a urinary tract infeciton, with symptoms of hematuria. This log documents N/A (not applicable) under Culture Results. On 06/23/23 at 9:58 AM, V4 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated she couldn't remember if she had a conversation with R25's physician related to the results of the urine culture and sensitivity. V4 stated if she had gotten the lab orders she would have called the physician. V4 stated she doesn't get the results back a lot of times unless she calls for them. On 06/22/23 at 10:48 AM, V2 (DON/Director of Nurses) stated as a nurse she would expect the doctor to have done more once the culture results were received. The facility Culture Guidelines dated 11/28/2012 documents, Purpose: To establish guidelines for performing cultures. 4. Culture and sensitivity results will be promptly reported to the attending physician and the Director of Nursing when reports indicate infections which require treatment, monitoring and/or specific precautionary measures.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) were provide...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) were provided per current standards of practice for 4 of 5 (R2, R5, R22, and R55) residents reviewed for ADL's in the sample of 69. Findings Include: 1. R5's facility Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cerebral infarct, seizures, diabetes, heart failure, anemia, difficulty in walking, and Parkinson's Disease. R5's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/25/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 06, which indicates a severe cognitive deficit. This same MDS documents under Section G, R5 requires assist of two staff for transfers, toileting, and personal hygiene. R5's current undated Care Plan documents a care area of (R5) voids in inappropriate places. With interventions that include, Toilet before and after meals to decrease behavior. On 6/22/23 at 1:31 PM, R5 was observed in the common area next to the nurses station being assisted with the noon meal. R5 was sitting in his wheelchair with a puddle under his chair and R5's pants were wet with what appeared to be urine. On 06/22/23 at 2:01 PM, R5 remained in his wheelchair near the nurse's station with the puddle still under the chair and R5's pants remained wet. Began continuous observation at 2:01 PM. At 2:11 PM, R5 was transported to the dining room to attend activities. At 2:29 PM, R5 remained in the dining room and was participating in the game. At 3:03 PM, R5 was asked if he was tired and wanted to lay down. R5 stated he was, and was moved from the dining room to the common area by the nurse's station and was told someone would be there soon to lay him down. R5 remained in his wheelchair in the common area and continuous observation continued until 3:48 PM when this surveyor asked V17 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) when R5 had last been toileted/checked. On 06/22/23 at 3:48 PM, V17 (CNA) stated R5 had been toileted right before lunch and not since. V17 stated R5 was not his resident but R5's CNA was on lunch and there were only two staff working at this time. V17 took R5 to his room to change and assist him to bed. V17 placed a gait belt on R5 and assisted R5 to stand. R5's pants were wet from the waist to his knees, R5's wheelchair seat appeared darker in color where R5 was sitting, indicating that it was wet. V17 assisted R5 to bed and removed R5's urine soaked pants and brief. V17 covered R5 up with a sheet and did not provide any skin and/or pericare. V17 removed his gloves, picked up the urine soaked pants, carried them to the soiled utility room, washed his hands, and dried them on his clothes. On 06/23/23 at 9:24 AM, V17 (CNA) stated he didn't provide incontinence care to R5 because he didn't have any wipes and didn't think about grabbing stuff before putting R5 in bed. When asked if that was typical V17 stated, If I have wipes, I clean them up when I lay them down so they don't have skin irritation. On 06/22/23 at 4:05 PM, V2 (Director of Nurses/DON) stated she expects staff to provide pericare after each incontinence episode and that residents will be assisted to bed and incontinence care provided as needed. 2. R2's Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include heart disease, arthritis, hypertension, and heart failure. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 5/8/23 documents R2 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 10, which indicates R2 has a moderate cognitive deficit. This same MDS documents under Section G, R2 requires two person physical assist for transfers. R2's current undated Care Plan documents a Focus Area of ADL self-care performance deficit with interventions that include, (R2) requires limited assist by one staff to move between surfaces as necessary. On 6/20/23 at 1:00 PM, V5 (family member) stated that on 6/18/23, V7 (family member) came to the facility at approximately 11:00 AM, and R2 was still in bed and hadn't been up and/or dressed. V5 stated V7 asked staff to assist R2 up. V5 stated it was 1:00 PM before staff assisted R2 out of bed and to get dressed. On 06/22/23 at 12:42 PM, V7 (Family Member) stated he arrived to the facility on Sunday 6/18/23 at approximately 11:15 AM. V7 stated when he arrived R2 was in bed and hadn't been dressed for the day. V7 stated he told V9 (CNA) two or three times that R2 needed to be gotten out of bed. V7 stated he told V9 that R2 wasn't eating well anyway and was refusing to eat while still in bed. V7 stated V9 was eating the first time he asked and then she was assisting other residents. V7 stated V9 just kept saying it would be a few minutes. V7 stated he asked V10 (CNA) and she said she needed someone to help her. V7 stated once he asked V8 (CNA) she got V9 and assisted R2 out of bed. This surveyor attempted to interview V8 and V9 (CNA's) who were not working and they did not answer/return phone calls. V10 stated she didn't work on 6/18/23. R2's Activities Preference Interview dated 6/13/23 documents R2's preferred waking time as 8:00 AM. R2's progress notes do not document a progress note dated 6/18/23. On 06/23/23 at 11:01 AM, V2 (DON) stated she was not aware of the concern R2 hadn't been gotten up on 6/18/23. When asked if there was any reason R2 would still be in bed and not dressed, V2 stated, Not that I am aware of. 3. R22's facility Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include heart disease, age related osteoporosis, diabetes, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. R22's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 10, which indicates a moderate cognitive impairment. This same MDS under Section G, documents R22 requires assist of two staff to transfer. R22's current undated Care Plan documents a care area of ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit. This care area includes the following interventions, I require a (mechanical lift) with 2 staff assistance for transfers, and Encourage me to use the bell call for assistance. On 6/20/23 at 1:33 PM, R22 was observed sitting in her wheelchair in her room and stated it takes a long time for staff to assist her to get to bed. R22 stated the staff say it is because they don't have enough help. R22 stated staff had brought her to her room when she finished lunch and she asked to be transferred to the bed. R22 stated they told her they would be back and she is still waiting to go to bed. R22 was not able to give specific time she had been brought to her room or which staff had told her they would be back. On 06/20/23 at 2:04 PM, R22 remained in her wheelchair in her room and stated staff had not been in her room to assist her. On 6/20/23 at 2:39 PM, R22 was observed sitting in her room in her wheelchair. On 6/20/23 at 2:41 PM, V4 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated she had been in R22's room and R22 hadn't said anything about wanting to lay down. V4 stated she would have someone assist R22 to bed. On 06/23/23 at 11:01 AM, V2 (DON) stated R22 prefers to lay down right after meals but needs to stay up for awhile due to acid reflux. When asked how long R22 should stay up, V2 stated 30 minutes to an hour. 4. R55's facility Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic respiratory failure, heart disease, and flaccid hemiplegia affecting left dominant side. R55's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 10, which indicates a moderate cognitive impairment. This same MDS under Section G, documents R55 requires assist of two staff to transfer and toilet. R55's current undated Care Plan documents a care area of ADL self-care performance deficit with interventions that include, (R2) requires extensive assist by 2 staff for toileting, and (R2) requires extensive assist by 2 staff to move between surfaces as necessary. On 06/20/23 at 2:16 PM, R55 stated he has to wait at times for assistance. When asked if there was any negative outcome when he had to wait, R55 stated I have sores on my bottom that they are putting cream on. R55 stated there was no specific incident the sores just happened over time due to sitting in his chair all day. R55 stated because sometimes they don't have time to get him out of chair. R55 stated approximately 3 weeks ago, he was wet/soaked with urine and sat in his wheelchair from 5PM to 12:30 AM before he got changed. When asked if he told anyone he stated he told them in the residential meeting. On 06/23/23 at 8:50 AM, observed R55's buttocks with V2 (DON) present and the area had what appeared to be scarring from healed MASD (moisture associated skin disorder) with two small areas of what appeared to be MASD. R55 stated the staff were still putting the cream on his buttocks to treat the area. The facility Resident Council Meeting minutes document the following; 5/10/23 under Nursing, Call lights taking 30 + minutes to get answered. 4/12/23 under Nursing, Takes a while to be laid down in bed in evening. 3/8/23 under Nursing, Takes a long time to attend to call lights day shift and night shift. 2/8/23 under Nursing, Call lights on for long period of time (nights), call lights being shut off without providing care say they need to get something then doesn't come back. 1/11/2023 under Nursing, Nurses turn light off then forget to come back. On 06/23/23 at 11:01 AM V2 (DON) stated she hasn't had any complaints or concerns brought to her by residents or families related to ADL care. When asked what she attributed residents not being assisted to bed and being left in urine soaked pants for long periods of time, V2 stated, We are going to have in-services and training. We have a staff meeting scheduled.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to prepare the pre-planned menu for 15 of 15 residents (R2, R5, R6, R9, R11, R12, R19, R29, R31, R42, R43, R47, R48, R50, and R54...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to prepare the pre-planned menu for 15 of 15 residents (R2, R5, R6, R9, R11, R12, R19, R29, R31, R42, R43, R47, R48, R50, and R54) reviewed for menus being followed in a sample of 69. The Findings Include: The lunch menu for 6/20/23 lists chicken patty on bun, peas and potato logs as the planned meal. On 6/20/23 at 10:30 AM, V12 (Cook) provided a menu revision that replaced carrots for the peas on the lunch menu. At this time, V12 was preparing the meals for the mechanical soft and puree residents. V12 was observed removing chicken from a pot of boiling water. V12 then mechanically chops the boiled chicken for the mechanical soft and blends to a smooth consistency for the puree diets. On 6/20/23 at 11:25 AM, V12 was observed preparing the steam table with the lunch items to be served. At this time, when asked why boiled chicken was used for the puree and mechanical soft diets, V12 stated that they did not have enough chicken patties for all residents. V12 was then asked why the puree and mechanical soft diets were receiving mashed potatoes and V3 (Dietary Manager) stated that the potato wedges had the skin on them so they were not safe to serve mechanically altered diets. Review of the Diet Spreadsheet for reference of the 6/20/23 lunch meal indicates that regular diet residents receive fresh potato wedges. Mechanical Soft diet residents receive chopped soft potato wedges and pureed diet residents receive pureed potato wedges. On 6/21/23 at 9:30 AM, V3 stated she was unsure as to why V12 didn't follow the recipe for the fresh potato wedges so that all diet types would have the planned menu. The fresh potato wedge recipe for regular diet documents: 1. Peel baking potatoes and cut into 1/2 slices; place in a greased baking pan. 2. Melt margarine and drizzle over the potatoes. Toss lightly to coat. 3. Combine the rosemary, onion powder, garlic powder, and parsley in a small dish. Sprinkle over potatoes and toss lightly. 4. Bake for 1-1/12 hours or until potatoes are tender. The chopped fresh potato wedge recipe for mechanical soft diet documents: 1. Peel skins and cut potatoes into wedges and place in a large mixing bowl. 2. Drizzle with oil and rosemary, onion powder, garlic salt, and parsley. Toss to coat evenly. 3. Place potatoes in a single layer on greased baking sheets. 4. Bake for 30-35 minutes or until potatoes are soft and tender and lightly browned. Turn sheet trays halfway through cooking. 5. Chop vegetable into bite sized pieces . Serve wedges topped with ketchup or gravy to soften potato. The puree potato wedge recipe for puree diet documents: 1. Potato wedges to be added to the blender and use hot milk to thin gradually to achieve desired consistency. 2. If the product needs thickening, gradually add a commercial or natural food thickener to achieve a smooth pudding or soft mashed potato consistency. A diet type report dated for 6/21/23, was provided by V1 (Administrator) with all residents in the facility and diet order. The following residents who have a current diet order for Mechanical Soft are: R5, R6, R9, R12, R19, R29, R31, R42, R43, R47, R50 and R54. Residents per this report that receive pureed diets are: R2 and R11. R48 receives pureed meat and mechanical soft for all other foods.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 06/21/23 at 2:15 PM, V20 (CNA) stated she was hired to work on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday for the 6:00 AM to 6:00 PM shif...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 06/21/23 at 2:15 PM, V20 (CNA) stated she was hired to work on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday for the 6:00 AM to 6:00 PM shift. V20 stated she had another job and was going PRN (as needed) because she was routinely the only CNA on the dementia unit for 20 plus residents and it was too much for one person. V20 stated the nurse would help out, but if she was showering a resident she could not monitor the other residents like they should be. She pointed out that because it was survey week the facility put extra CNAs on the Unit. V20 stated, They can find staff when they need to, and I've told them I need help. The facility schedule dated 06/01/23 through 06/23/23 was reviewed and documented one CNA working the dementia unit as follows - On the 6:00 AM to 6:00 PM shift - 06/03/23, 06/07/23, 06/08/23, 06/09/23, 06/14/23, 06/17/23, 06/18/23, 06/19/23. On the 6:00 PM to 6:00 AM shift - 06/01/23, 06/03/23, 06/04/23, 06/05/23, 06/06/23, 06/08/23, 06/09/23, 06/10/23, 06/11/23, 06/12/23, 06/15/12, 06/16/23, 06/17/23, 06/18/23, 06/19/23, 06/21/23, 06/21/23. On 06/23/23 at 3:00 PM, V22 (CNA) had not returned call with message left for interview. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents. This has the potential to affect all 65 residents who currently reside at the facility. Findings Include: The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents dated 6/20/23 documents 65 residents reside in the facility. 1. R5's facility Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cerebral infarct, seizures, diabetes, heart failure, anemia, difficulty in walking, and Parkinson's Disease. R5's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/25/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 06, which indicates a severe cognitive deficit. This same MDS documents R5 requires assist of two staff for transfers, toileting, and personal hygiene. R5's current undated Care Plan documents a care area of (R5) voids in inappropriate places. With interventions that include, Toilet before and after meals to decrease behavior. On 6/22/23 at 1:31 PM, R5 was observed in the common area next to the nurses station being assisted with the noon meal. R5 was sitting in his wheelchair with a puddle under of the chair and R5's pants were wet from what appeared to be urine. On 06/22/23 at 2:01 PM, R5 remained in his wheelchair near the nurse's station with the puddle still under the chair and R5's pants remained wet. This surveyor began continuous observation at 2:01 PM. At 2:11 PM, R5 was transported to the dining room to attend activities. At 2:29 PM, R5 remained in the dining room and was participating in the game. At 3:03 PM, R5 was asked if he was tired and wanted to lay down. R5 stated he was and was moved from the dining room to the common area by the nurse's station and was told someone would be there soon to lay him down. R5 remained in his wheelchair in the common area and continuous observation continued until 3:48 PM when this surveyor asked V17 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) when R5 had last been toileted/checked. On 06/22/23 at 3:48 PM, V17 (CNA) stated R5 had been toileted right before lunch and not since. V17 stated R5 was not his resident but R5's CNA was on lunch and there were only two staff working at this time. V17 took R5 to his room to change and assist him to bed. V17 placed a gait belt on R5 and assisted R5 to stand. R5's pants were wet from the waist band to his knees, R5's wheelchair seat appeared darker in color where R5 was sitting, indicating the seat was wet. V17 assisted R5 to bed and removed R5's urine soaked pants and brief. V17 covered R5 up with a sheet and did not provide any skin and/or pericare. V17 removed his gloves, picked up the urine soaked pants, carried them to the soiled utility room, washed his hands, and dried them on his clothes. On 06/22/23 at 4:05 PM, V2 (Director of Nurses/DON) would have expected R5 would have been changed and assisted to bed when he wanted, and should have been cleaned with pericare. 2. R2's Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include heart disease, arthritis, hypertension, and heart failure. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 5/8/23 documents R2 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 10, which indicates R2 has a moderate cognitive deficit. This same MDS documents under Section G, R2 requires two person physical assist for transfers. R2's current undated Care Plan documents a Focus Area of ADL self-care performance deficit with interventions that include, (R2) requires limited assist by one staff to move between surfaces as necessary. On 6/20/23 at 1:00 PM, V5 (family member) of R2 stated that on 6/18/23, V7 (family member) came to the facility at approximately 11:00 AM, and R2 was still in bed and hadn't been up and/or dressed. V5 stated V7 asked staff to assist R2 up. V5 stated it was 1:00 PM before staff assisted R2 out of bed and to get dressed. On 06/22/23 at 12:42 PM, V7 (Family Member) stated he was at the facility on Sunday 6/18/23 and arrived about 11:15 AM. V7 stated when he arrived, R2 was in bed and hadn't been dressed for the day. V7 stated he told V9 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) two or three times that R2 needed to be gotten out of bed. V7 stated he told V9 that R2 wasn't eating well anyway and was refusing to eat while still in bed. V7 stated V9 was eating the first time he asked and then she was assisting other residents. V7 stated V9 just kept saying it would be a few minutes. V7 stated he asked V10 (CNA) and she said she needed someone to help her. V7 stated once he asked V8 (CNA) she got V9 and assisted R2 out of bed. Attempted to interview V8 and V9, no answer/return call. V10 stated she didn't work on 6/18/23. On 06/23/23 at 11:01 AM, V2 (DON) stated she was not aware of the concern R2 hadn't been gotten up on 6/18/23. When asked if there was any reason R2 would still be in bed and not dressed, V2 stated, Not that I am aware of. 3. R22's facility Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include heart disease, age related osteoporosis, diabetes, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. R22's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 10, which indicates a moderate cognitive impairment. This same MDS under Section G, documents R22 requires assist of two staff to transfer. R22's current undated Care Plan documents a care area of ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit. This care area includes the following interventions, I require a (mechanical lift) with 2 staff assistance for transfers, and Encourage me to use the bell call for assistance. On 6/20/23 at 1:33 PM, R22 stated it takes a long time for staff to assist her to get to bed. R22 stated the staff say it is because they don't have enough help. R22 stated she was waiting for assistance on the date and time of this interview. R22 was observed sitting in her wheelchair in her room. R22 stated she had just got done eating lunch and the staff brought her right to her room after she ate. On 06/20/23 at 2:04 PM, R22 remained in her wheelchair in her room and stated staff had not been in her room to assist her. R22 stated they told her they would be right back after they brought her back from lunch. When asked if she remembered who told her R22 stated, she didn't know. On 6/20/23 at 2:39 PM, R22 was observed sitting in her room in her wheelchair. On 6/20/23 at 2:41 PM, V4 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated she had been in R22's room and R22 hadn't said anything about wanting to lay down. V4 stated she would have someone assist R22 to bed. On 06/23/23 at 11:01 AM, V2 (DON) stated R22 prefers to lay down right after meals but needs to stay up for awhile due to acid reflux. When asked how long R22 should stay up, V2 stated 30 minutes to an hour. 4.a) R55's facility Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic respiratory failure, heart disease, and flaccid hemiplegia affecting left dominant side. R55's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 10, which indicates R55 has a moderate cognitive impairment. This same MDS under Section G, documents R55 requires assist of two staff for bed mobility, toilet use, and transfers. R55's current undated Care Plan documents a care area of ADL self-care performance deficit with interventions that include, (R2) requires extensive assist by 2 staff for toileting, and (R2) requires extensive assist by 2 staff to move between surfaces as necessary. On 06/20/23 at 2:16 PM, R55 stated he has to wait at times for assistance. When asked if there was any negative outcome when he had to wait, R55 stated I have sores on my bottom that they are putting cream on. R55 stated there was no specific incident the sores just happened over time due to sitting in his chair all day. R55 stated approximately 3 weeks ago, he was wet/soaked with urine and sat in his wheelchair from 5PM to 12:30 AM before he got changed. When asked if he told anyone he stated he told them in the residential meeting. On 06/23/23 at 8:50 AM, observed R55's buttocks with V2 (DON) present and the area had what appeared to be scarring from healed MASD (moisture associated skin disorder) with two small areas of what appeared to be MASD. R55 stated the staff were still putting the cream on his buttocks to treat the area. The facility Resident Council Meeting minutes document the following; 5/10/23 under Nursing, Call lights taking 30 + minutes to get answered. 4/12/23 under Nursing, Takes a while to be laid down in bed in evening. 3/8/23 under Nursing, .Takes a long time to attend to call lights day shift and night shift. 2/8/23 under Nursing, Call lights on for long period of time (nights), call lights being shut off without providing care say they need to get something then doesn't come back. 1/11/2023 under Nursing, Nurses turn light off then forget to come back. On 06/23/23 at 11:01 AM, V2 (DON) stated she hasn't had any complaints or concerns brought to her by residents or families related to ADL care. When asked what she attributed residents not being assisted to bed and being left in urine soaked pants for long periods of time, V2 stated, We are going to have in-services and training. We have a staff meeting scheduled. 4.b) R55's facility Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include muscle spasm, spinal stenosis, and diabetes. R55's current undated Care Plan documents a care area of I have limited physical mobility, with interventions that include Nursing Rehab/Restorative: Active ROM program to BLE (bilateral lower extremities) 5-10 reps across all planes twice daily and PRN (as needed) x (times) 7 d/w (days/week). On 06/20/23 at 2:16 PM, R55 stated he wasn't getting therapy and not getting any passive ROM. R55 was observed sitting in his wheelchair and self-propelling it throughout the survey process. R55's POC (Point of Care) Response History with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R55 did not receive ROM exercises on 5/28, 6/5, and 6/16/23 and that R55 received ROM exercises only one time on 5/25, 5/27, 6/1, 6/2, 6/4, 6/6, 6/8, 6/12, 6/14, and 6/17-6/22/23. This same form documents R55 refused ROM exercises on 6/1, 6/16, and 6/20/23. On 06/23/23 at 8:34 AM, V2 (DON) stated they have a restorative aid, and V2 knows R55 refuses restorative programs at times. V2 stated if the restorative aid isn't working the CNA's do the restorative programs. On 06/23/23 at 9:56 AM, V19 (Restorative Aid) stated she works four days a week. When asked if she did the restorative programs for all of the residents on the days she worked, V19 stated she was supposed to. When asked if she was able to get them done everyday, V19 stated, Not everyday. V19 stated they are short staffed so she gets pulled to work the floor as a CNA. V19 stated she has had residents complaint to her that it is taking longer to be transferred from bed to chair and chair to bed and for incontinence care to be provided. When asked what she would attribute that to, V19 stated, Staffing, for sure. On 06/23/23 at 11:01 AM, this surveyor reviewed with V2 (DON) that V19 stated she wasn't always able to do restoratives because she would get pulled to the floor to work as a CNA. V2 stated, It happens sometimes. On 06/22/23 at 11:04 AM, V6 (Ombudsman) stated one of the concerns she hears at the facility is that they are short staffed. V6 stated residents have brought concerns to her related to call lights not being answered timely. On 6/23/23 at 1:31 PM, V1 (Administrator) sent in email to this surveyor that the facility did not have a staffing policy.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep food contact surfaces clean and sanitized to prevent cross contamination. These failures have the potential to affect all...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep food contact surfaces clean and sanitized to prevent cross contamination. These failures have the potential to affect all 65 residents in the facility. The Findings Include: On 6/20/23 at 9:30 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen the following items were found: 1. The countertop slicer in the kitchen was covered with a plastic bag. When the bag was removed the bottom side of the blade and the base of the slicer were found to have dried food debris on them. At this time, V3 (Dietary Supervisor) stated that the plastic covering indicated that it is ready for use. V3 immediately instructed V12 (Cook) to clean and sanitize the slicer. 2. A measuring scoop was found in the bulk sugar bin with the handle laying in the sugar. V3 removed the scoop at this time. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents dated 6/20/23, documents 65 residents reside in the facility.
Nov 2022 10 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to transcribe physician orders to ensure blood glucose monitoring, acqu...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to transcribe physician orders to ensure blood glucose monitoring, acquisition, and administration of insulin in accordance with the prescriber's order on two separate facility admissions for 1 of 5 (R5) residents reviewed for administration of insulin. This failure has the potential for R5 to develop ketoacidosis which could result in coma and possible death. The Immediate Jeopardy was identified to have begun on 10/07/22 when R5 was admitted to the facility and the facility failed to transcribe physician orders from the hospital discharge records to ensure blood glucose's were monitored and insulin was administered per physician's orders. V1, Administrator and V2, Director of Nursing were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 11/2/22 at 3:29 PM. The surveyor confirmed by interview and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 11/04/2022, but non-compliance remains at Level Two because addition time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training. Findings Include: R5's facility admission Record with a print date of 10/20/22 documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 10/14/22 with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes without complications. R5's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/8/22 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R5 is cognitively intact. R5's regional hospital after visit summary with hospital stay dates of 10/04/22 to 10/7/22 includes the following medications on the medication list, Tresiba inject 52 units into the skin daily and NovoLog 100 unit/ml inject into skin 3 times daily. R5's regional hospital records document under Scheduled meds sorted by name an order for Humalog three times daily before meals if blood glucose is 150-169 give 1 unit, 170-189 give 2 units, 190-209 give 3 units, 210- 229 give 4 units, 230-249 give 5 units, 250-269 give 6 units, 270-299 give 7 units, and if BS (blood glucose) greater than or equal to 300, give 8 units and recheck BS at next ordered time. If BS remains consecutively greater than 300 at next scheduled recheck call MD (physician) R5's regional hospital record documents under Basic Metabolic Panel that R5's blood glucose level was 176 on 10/07/22. There is a noted discrepancy in R5's hospital discharge orders that lists both Novolog and Humalog as the fast acting insulin to be administered via sliding scale. Since these orders were never implemented at the facility, it was never clarified which fast acting insulin was correct. R5's Progress Notes document on 10/08/22, R5 was transferred from the local dialysis center to the local emergency room for evaluation of chest pain. R5's progress notes document R5 was admitted to a regional hospital. R5's progress notes document R5 was discharged from the regional hospital back to the facility on [DATE]. R5's regional hospital records, under Patient Care Orders, include physician orders on 10/10/22 for Tresiba 52 units inject into skin daily and Humalog three times daily before meals with the following schedule documented, 150-189 - 1 unit, 190-299 - 2 units, 230-269- 3 units, 270-299 - 4 units, if blood glucose is greater than or equal to 300, give 5 units and recheck BS at next ordered time. If BS remains consecutively greater than 300 at next scheduled recheck, call MD. R5's Order Summary Report dated Active orders as of 10/13/2022 do not document physician orders for insulin or blood glucose monitoring from 10/07/22 until 10/13/22. R5's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 10/01/22 to 10/31/22 does not document an order to administer sliding scale insulin, Tresiba insulin, or to monitor blood glucose levels from 10/07/22 to 10/13/22. R5's facility progress notes document on 10/12/22 7:30 AM, Resident (R5) had an un-witnessed fall 10/12/22 6:30 AM. Location of Fall: Resident Room, Resident attempted to arise from recliner to take self to bed. Resident slid from recliner to the floor. Resident stated no injuries were obtained. On 10/12/2022 6:30 AM Assessment: Witnessed Fall- Did not strike head; Neurological checks not indicated. Alert and oriented to time, person, place, and situation. No changes in range of motion from normal baseline. No injuries observed. Actions Taken: Multiple staff assisted resident from floor to recliner. Full body assessment completed with no findings of any new areas. Daughter insisted that resident be seen in the ER. Resident was seen in ER with a full work up completed, IVF (Intravenous fluids) administered, labs drawn, and CT (computerized tomography) of head completed. Resident returned to the facility with daughter escorting him. Report given by ER nursing staff and no areas of concern noted. No findings all test negative. No new orders given at time to discharge from emergency room. Vitals: Hypotension: medications reviewed, and areas of concern noted R/T (related to) consistent with low blood pressure. V4 (Physician) notified and full admission assessment completed. V4 (Physician) will continue to monitor. R5's local hospital records dated 10/12/22 documents under Assessment, Patient (R5) brought to ER (emergency room) from (name of facility) by family member who reports patient fell at nursing home this morning. Patient was in floor for approx (approximately) 4 hrs (hours) and is unsure if he slid off the bed or had stood up and fell. Patient is slightly confused and family states that patient has been declining cognitively since Sunday. Family reports she requested nursing home have a CT (computerized tomography) of the head done but the order had never been obtained. Under additional history R5's hospital record documents, AMS (altered mental status) x (times) 2 days. Recent Subarachnoid bleed from MVC (motor vehicle crash) 10/3/2022, possible fall early this AM. R5's local hospital Lab Results Summary dated 10/12/2022 documents a blood glucose level of 273 with the normal range listed as 65-110. On 10/19/22 at 9:32 AM, R5 stated the facility staff didn't stick his finger (blood glucose monitoring) or give him his insulin. R5 stated his blood sugar was a little high while he was at the facility. When asked what symptoms he would have when his blood sugars were elevated R5 stated, dizziness and weakness. On 10/18/22 at 4:00 PM, V5 (Family Member) stated R5 was admitted to the facility for physical therapy after a hospital stay for a motor vehicle accident with a subsequent brain bleed. V5 stated on 10/08/22 R5 was re-admitted to the hospital from dialysis for evaluation for complaints of chest pain. V5 stated on 10/10/22 she transported R5 back to the facility and delivered his hospital discharge orders to the facility staff. V5 sated on 10/11/22 she stopped to visit R5 on her lunch break and an unknown CNA mentioned he seemed a little confused. V5 stated that was not normal for R5 but he sometimes gets really tired after dialysis. V5 stated after sitting with R5 she determined R5 did not seem himself intermittently throughout her visit. V5 stated she asked R5 if he had been getting his blood sugars checked and he said he had not. V5 stated she asked R5 if he had been getting his insulin and he wasn't sure. V5 stated she spoke with the nurse (believed to be V11) and told V11 about R5's Dexcom reader in his room and V11 stated he would share it with the other nurse's. V5 stated on 10/12/22 she was notified by a family member R5 had fallen. V5 stated she spoke with V2 (DON) on the phone on 10/12/22 and asked her if R5 had been receiving his insulin and V2 stated they had been checking his blood sugar with R5's reader and had been administering R5's insulin. V5 stated after she got off work she asked the facility if they had gotten the CT scan she had requested to ensure R5's intermittent confusion and falling were results of the brain bleed worsening and they had not so V5 signed R5 out of the facility and took him to the local emergency room for evaluation. V5 stated upon returning to the facility she reported to the nurse working that R5 needed his insulin and the nurse (V14) stated R5 did not have orders for insulin. V5 stated she went home and got R5's insulin to administer to him. V5 stated R5 administered his insulin himself as his blood sugars were over 300. V5 stated V14 found R5's hospital discharge orders from the regional hospital. V5 stated around midnight V14 came to R5's room and reported she had found R5's insulin orders and R5 had not been administered insulin since his admission to the facility on [DATE]. V5 stated she asked V2 on 10/13/22 why she had told her R5 had been getting his insulin when in fact he had not and V2 stated the nursing staff had told her he was. V5 stated then V2 told her R5 did have blood glucose monitoring ordered and V5 told V2 that ordered was put in at midnight on 10/12/22 after it was determined they weren't being done. V5 stated at this point R5 had returned to his normal baseline since his blood sugars were back within normal range. R5's FreeStyle Libre 2 AGP Report documents R5's blood glucose readings and was obtained from V5 (Family Member) on 10/20/22 at 7:06 AM. This report dated 10/7/22 to 10/13/22 documents R5's blood sugar reading on 10/07/22 at approximately 8 PM as being 226. There are no blood sugar readings documented for 10/08, 10/09, 10/10, and 10/11/22. The report documents on 10/12/22 beginning at 6:00 PM and ending at midnight, R5's blood sugars were 238, 241, 266, 298, 307, 322, 312, 275, 252, 248, 240, and 215. R5's blood sugars on 10/13/22 beginning at 2:00 AM and ending at 12:00 PM are 192, 182, 180, and 154. This indicates R5's blood sugars were as high as 322 before being administered insulin on 10/12/22 and down to 154 after getting insulin. On 10/19/22 at 1:15 PM, V11 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated he provided care for R5 one day (unable to recall which day). R5's MAR (Medication Administration Record) dated 10/1/22 to 10/31/22 documents V11 signed off as administering medications on 10/11/22. V11 stated he knew R5 had the Dexcom (blood glucose monitor/reader) because V5 (daughter) had told him it was there, and some nurses were having issues using it. When asked if he administered insulin to R5, V11 stated he didn't recall giving R5 any injections. On 10/20/22 at 6:45 AM, V14 (LPN) stated she worked at the facility on 10/12/22 and provided care to R5 when he returned to the facility from the emergency room on this same day. V14 stated when they (R5 and V5) returned from the emergency room they told her they had stopped at the cafeteria and eaten so R5 would need his insulin. V14 stated she informed them she didn't have physician orders for R5 to receive insulin. V14 stated V5 gave her R5's sliding scale that he had been following prior to admission to the facility. V14 stated she reviewed R5's admission paperwork/orders and located the physician orders for insulin. V14 stated the facility did not have the type of insulin R5 had ordered, so V5 provided R5's home insulin for administration, until it could be obtained from the pharmacy. On 10/19/22 at 1:35 PM, V12 (LPN) stated she only provided care one day while R5 was at the facility. V12 stated it was the last day R5 was at the facility (10/14/22), before being transferred to another Long-Term Care Facility. V12 stated she didn't administer R5's insulin because R5's daughter administered it. When asked if R5 had insulin in the medication cart, V12 stated, he didn't. On 10/20/2022 at 1:33 PM, V16 (Pharmacist) stated R5 did not have an order for insulin and /or insulin delivered to the facility from the pharmacy until 10/13/22. R5's Order Summary Report Active Orders as of: 10/13/2022 documents the following orders with start date of 10/13/22; blood glucose check before meals and bedtime as needed, blood glucose check before meals and bedtime, Humalog Kwik pen 100 unit/ml (milliliter) (this order has pending confirmation documented next to) inject as per sliding scale if 0-70 = 0 unit, if 71-100 = 4 units, if 101-150 = 8 units, if 151-200 = 12 units, if 201-400 = 16 units, subcutaneously before meals, Novolog flex pen 100 unit/ml inject as per sliding scale before meals and bedtimes with the same sliding scale dosing as listed above, Tresiba 100 unit/ml inject 52 units subcutaneously in the morning. R5's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 10/01/22 to 10/31/22 documents an order for Tresiba Solution 100 unit/milliliter (ml) inject 52 units subcutaneously in the morning with a start date of 10/13/22 and the MAR documents it was administered on 10/13/22 and 10/14/22 at 8:00 AM. R5's MAR does not document Tresiba was administered on any other day during R5's stay at the facility. This indicates R5 did not receive Tresiba insulin as ordered on 10/08, 10/11, and 10/12/22. However, V5 reported self-administering R5's insulin on the night of 10/12/22. R5's MAR documents an order for NovoLog flex pen 100 unit/ml inject as per sliding scale if 0-70 =0 units, 71-100 = 4 units, 101-150=8 units, 151-200 = 12 units, 201-400 = 16 units inject subcutaneously before meals with a start date of 10/13/22 at 5:00 AM. R5's MAR documents R5's blood sugar was 180 and 12 units of NovoLog insulin was administered on 10/13/22 at 5:00 AM. R5's MAR does not document R5 received any other doses of sliding scale insulin from day of admission on [DATE] until day of discharge on [DATE]. R5's MAR documents an order for blood glucose checks before meals and at bedtime with a start dated of 10/13/22 at 5:00 AM. R5's MAR documents the following blood glucose results 10/13/22 5:00 AM - 180, 10/13/22 11:00 AM 154, 10/13/22 4:00 PM -131, 10/13/22 8:00 PM - 210, 10/14/22 5:00 AM - 161, 10/14/22 11:00 AM -162. This indicates R5 should have received sliding scale insulin on 10/13/22 at 11:00 AM, 4:00 PM, and 8:00 PM and on 10/14/22 at 5:00 AM and 11:00 AM. R5's MAR does not document the sliding scale insulin was administered as ordered. On 10/21/22 at 9:45 AM, V2 (DON) stated there were insulin orders for R5 on his hospital discharge orders, but it was confusing because some of it was handwritten in. V2 stated if it isn't handwritten by the physician, then it throws her off. When asked what her expectation would be, in that situation, V2 stated she would expect the nursing staff to call the physician and clarify the orders. When asked if she did a med error report V2 stated, No, I will. At 1:55 PM on this same date V2 stated the nurse responsible for reviewing and transcribing R5's admission orders, no longer works at the facility. V2 stated she was made aware R5 had not received his insulin the day he came back from the hospital (10/12/22). V2 stated when she became aware of it, she reviewed the orders, and did an audit of each resident on insulin on 10/20/22. On 10/25/22 at 3:00 PM, V2 stated R5's medication administration record does not document R5 received sliding scale insulin as ordered by the physician. V2 confirmed the blood glucose checks were done as ordered and R5 should have received sliding scale insulin. V2 stated she would consider it a medication error and she would expect insulin to be administered as ordered. On 10/21/22 at 11:30 AM, reviewed R5's orders and administration records with V4 (Physician) which documented R5 should have received long-acting insulin as well as sliding scale insulin. V4 stated, That is inexcusable. V4 stated he takes that very seriously. Reviewed with V4 what R5's blood glucose levels (273) were when he was evaluated at the hospital and V4 stated he didn't think R5 not getting his insulin was a contributing factor for the fall. When asked what the potential negative outcomes are for a diabetic to not get insulin as ordered V4 stated, Ketoacidosis, coma, and possible death. R5's undated care plan documents a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with no focus area or interventions documented related to the diagnosis. The facility Medication Variance Report dated 10/13/22 documents R5 had an order of Tresiba inject 52 units subcutaneously every morning related to Type 2 diabetes mellitus with the order date documented as 10/10/22. The variance report documents R5 didn't receive the medication. The report documents it was a missed order under transcribing error. The report documents V4 (Physician) was notified with no date or time of notification. The report documents (V5) asked V14 (LPN) about insulin, which V14 found on orders but not in (electronic health record). Nurse (V14) then put all insulin orders in (electronic health record). The report documents no harm with circumstances or events have capacity to cause event, marked. The report documents the involved staff person was educated. The facility Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Reactions policy dated 11/7/2012 documents, Purpose: 1. To safeguard the resident. 2. To identify causes and prevent future errors. 3. To provide guidelines for reporting and recording. General Guidelines: 1. All medication, treatment errors, and drug reactions must be reported promptly. Notify the attending physician or Medical Director if the attending physician is not available. The Medication Error report is to be given to the Director of Nursing during or before the end of the shift for follow up. A detailed account of the incident must be recorded in the resident's medical record. Documentation should be factual and should not contain words such as error or incident Just state the facts. Documentation should include a. The time and date of the incident b. The name, strength, and dosage of medication administered c. The resident's reaction to the medication d. The condition of the resident e. Any treatment administered, and f. The date and time the physician and family was notified and his/her instructions. 4. Residents receiving incorrect medication or having a drug reaction should be observed as needed. Any change in the resident's condition will be reported to the physician and Director of Nursing . The facility Medication Administration Policy dated 1/1/2015 documents under, II. Administration of Medications. Medications must be administered in accordance with a physician's order, e.g., the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right route, and right time. The Immediate Jeopardy that began on 10/07/22 was removed on 11/04/22 when the facility took the following actions to remove the immediacy. Removal Plan: Description of Occurrence: Medication Error: 1. Insulin audit was conducted and found to be in compliance. Insulin audit began on 10/19/22 by V2 (Director of Nurses) and V3 (Assistant Director of Nurses). The second audit was completed on 11/2/2022. 12 residents were identified as being potentially affected. 2. Third shift nurse to follow up with a medication reconciliation to ensure medications are all followed through for all medications and will be ongoing. 3. Educate all licensed staff on admission, re-admission process including obtaining orders from MD (physician) and reconciliation with hospital transfer form. Educate nurses on med pass administration and monitoring for side effects of drugs. Additional training was completed on medications rights of administration and identifying and addressing change in condition and causative factors Training and Education will be performed by V2 (DON) and V3 (ADON). Any on leave or unavailable will be educated via phone and again before next scheduled shift. This was completed on 11/01/2022 by V2 (DON) and V3 (ADON). 4. All admissions will have a medication reconciliation completed using admission audit (QA tool admission readmission checklist/audit) by facility leadership within 72 hours of admission. This began on 11/1/2022 and will be on going. This IDT (Interdisciplinary) team is included in leadership. 5. Pharmacy consultant group consulted to complete admission audit within 72 hours of admission starting on 11/1/2022. 6. Licensed nurse who did initial admission is no longer employed since 10/18/2022 at the facility- other nurse doing subsequent admission has been disciplined and educated by V1 (Administrator) and V3 (ADON). 7. Medical director notified of incident on 11/01/2022 and reviewed the facility's immediate action plan. He was in agreement with immediate action plan. 8. QAPI review with Medical Director to review medication orders, medication review and reconciliation. 9. R5 discharged to other facility on 10/14/2022. 10. All audits will be going with no stop date by V2 (DON) and V3 (ADON).
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered timely for 6 of 6 (R5...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered timely for 6 of 6 (R5, R6, R7, R8, and R9, R20) residents reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 20. This failure resulted in the following 1. R5, who had a history of a brain bleed, was laying on the floor for four hours before being found by facility staff. 2. R9 who has a history of pressure ulcers and is being up in his chair for more than two hours, sitting in urine that burns his skin, and being in pain. 3. R6 who had recently had a catheter removed does not get timely bladder training and has to do bladder training herself in her adult incontinent brief since it took facility staff too long to respond to the call light. This has the potential to affect all 67 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: 1. R5's facility admission Record with a print date of 10/20/2022 documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic kidney disease, cardiac arrythmia, dependence on renal dialysis, type 2 diabetes, morbid obesity, atrial fibrillation, and person injured in unspecified vehicle accident. R5's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/08/22 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R5 is cognitively intact. Section G of R5's MDS documents R5 requires two-person physical assist for transfers and one-person physical assist for bed mobility. R5's undated care plan documents a Focus area date initiated 10/08/22 of I am at (Specify High, Moderate, Low) risk for falls r/t (related to). Goal: I will not sustain serious injury through the review date. Date initiated: 10/08/2022, Target Date: 01/06/2023, Interventions/Tasks: Be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. The resident needs prompt responses to all requests for assistance. Date initiated 10/08/2022. R5's progress notes document on 10/12/2022 7:30 AM that R5 had an un-witnessed fall at 6:30 AM in his room when he attempted to arise from his recliner to take himself to bed. The note documents that R5 slid from his recliner to the floor, stated no injuries were obtained. The progress note also documents R5 was alert and oriented to time, person, place, and situation. No injuries observed. The note further documents the following intervention: re-educate resident frequently to use call light, assure call light and cell phone is within reach at all times. The facility Concern/Compliment Form dated 10/13/2022 documents under Nature of Concern/Compliment, R5 stated that he slid out of his recliner into the floor. Resident (R5) stated he doesn't know what happened or how long he had been there. Stated he has moments where he forgets. Under Summary of Pertinent Findings, the report documents, After investigating incident, resident was found to be in floor for only a short amount of time. No injuries noted. Under Corrective Actions Taken: Staff educated on timely call light monitoring. On 10/18/22 at 4:00 PM, V5 (Family Member) stated she was informed by a family member that R5 had reported to them he ended up in the floor around 2:00 AM and that R5 had pushed the call light multiple times and hollered for help, but no one came until around 6:30 AM to assist him. R5's local hospital emergency room record dated 10/12/22 documents R5 was evaluated at the local hospital at 2:33 PM for a fall. Under Assessment R5's hospital Nurse's Notes documents, Patient brought to ER (emergency room) from (name of facility) by family member who reports patient fell at nursing home this morning. Patient was in floor for approx. (approximately) 4 hrs (hours) and is unsure if he slid off the bed or had stood up and fell. Patient is slightly confused and family states that patient has been declining cognitively since Sunday. On 10/19/22 at 9:32 AM, R5 was alert and oriented and asked about his fall on 10/12/22. R5 stated he was sitting in his chair in his room and must have dozed off. R5 stated when he woke up, he had slid down the front of his chair and couldn't get back up. R5 stated he tried to find the call light but couldn't find it at first. R5 stated he hollered out several times. R5 stated he then found the call light and pushed it around 2:00 AM. R5 stated the facility staff finally came in after 6:00 AM and got him up and took him to the bathroom. R5 stated he pulled the chain in the bathroom, and no one came back. R5 stated he would tell staff he needed something, and they wouldn't come back. When asked how he knew how long he was laying in the floor the morning of his fall, R5 stated because he could see the clock on the wall. R5 stated at some point he ended up with his head on the floor under the table next to his bed in his room. On 10/27/22 at 10:39 AM, surveyor observed the room where R5 resided while at the facility. The beds in the room were facing a wall with a clock in the center of that wall. A recliner was beside one of the beds also facing the wall with the clock. The clock was noted to have accurate time displayed. On 10/18/22 at 12:58 PM, V6 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) stated R5's call light was on when she came to work on 10/12/22 at 6:00 AM. V6 stated V8 (CNA) went into R5's room and found R5 on the floor. V6 stated she didn't provide care to R5 that day. On 10/18/22 at 3:00 PM, V8 (CNA) stated R5's call light was on when she got to work on 10/12/22. V8 stated she answered a different residents call light first and provided care to that person then went to R5's room. V8 stated when she entered R5's room she saw him on the floor in front of his recliner with his head in front of his recliner. V8 stated R5 appeared to have missed his chair when sitting down. V8 stated she immediately went to get the nurse to assess R5. V8 stated R5 reported to them he had been laying there for hours and had been calling for help. On 10/21/22 at 12:02 PM, V20 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated she was working on 10/12/22 when R5 fell. V20 stated the CNA told her he had fallen. V20 stated it was after she had given report to the oncoming day shift. V20 stated it appeared as if R5 had fallen out of his recliner. V20 stated she couldn't remember if R5's call light was on at that time, but she knew it wasn't on when she was on that hall around 4:30 or 5:00 AM. V20 stated she was pretty sure R5 had received medications on the morning of 10/12/22. V20 stated she wasn't sure, but she knew she was in the room next to R5's that morning and had a conversation with the CNA's in the hallway right outside R5's room. R5's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 10/1/22 to 10/31/22 has no documentation showing any medications were administered on the morning of 10/12/22. On 10/26/22 at 10:30 PM, V21 (CNA) stated she took care of R5 on the night of 10/11/22 into the morning of 10/12/22. V21 stated she couldn't remember if R5 used his call light on the night of 10/11/22 or the morning of 10/12/22. V21 stated she couldn't remember when exactly they were in R5's room that night but she checks on every resident every couple of hours. On 10/26/22 at 10:24 PM and 10:40 PM, V22 (CNA) stated she provided care to R5 on 10/11/22 into the morning of 10/12/22. V22 stated she was in R5's room around 8:30 PM or 9:00 PM and then again at 2:00 AM and 4:00 AM. V22 stated she didn't remember if R5's call light was on at any time through the night. V22 stated it takes approximately 3 minutes to answer the lights and she hasn't had any residents complain call lights aren't being answered timely. When asked if she was involved with R5's care when he fell on the morning of 10/12/22, V22 stated she was probably giving report. When asked how they give report, V22 stated they do rounds. When asked to explain what that means, V22 stated they go to each room and tell the oncoming shift what happened with the resident through the night. When asked if she remembered doing rounds on the morning of 10/12/22, V22 stated they try to do them every morning. When asked if she saw R5 when she was doing rounds on the morning of 10/12/22, V22 stated, No, he was probably already up. On 10/27/22 at 10:52 AM, V6 (CNA) stated she got report at the nurse's station on the morning of 10/12/22. When asked if they did rounds and saw each resident, V6 stated they did not. When asked if anyone reported R5 falling V6 stated, No. On 10/26/22 at 9:41 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated R5 couldn't have been in the floor from 2AM to 6AM like R5 said. V1 stated he knew R5 didn't have his call light on because R5 said it was in his hand and then he said it slid out of his hand and the video shows people walking up and down the hallway. When this surveyor asked to view the video, V1 asked if it would help his case. This surveyor stated she was unsure due to not having seen the video yet. On 10/27/22 at 2:15 PM, this surveyor observed the video of R5's hall on 10/12/22 with V1 and V2 (DON/Director of Nurses) present. The door to R5's room was not clearly visible as the camera was facing the opposite wall and there was something obstructing the direct view of R5's doorway. At 5:48 AM, there was a CNA (possibly V21) who entered the hallway and got linens off the cart in the hallway. V21 then entered either R5's room or the room next to it. V21 then exited the room with dirty linens and placed them in a receptacle. On this same date and time, V2 stated R5 had been incontinent. R5's nurses notes reviewed from 10/07/22 to 10/13/22 document R5 is continent of bowel and bladder. V1 (Administrator) walked down the hall on live video to show this surveyor V21 entered R5's room. It was not clear on the live camera feed, which room V1 was entering. Based on the view available from the video, it was not possible to determine if V21 entered R5's room or the room next to it. 2. R9's facility admission Record with a print date of 10/26/22 documents R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include unspecified wound left foot, paraplegia, osteomyelitis, hypertension, and insomnia. R9's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 13, which indicates R9 is cognitively intact. Under Section G of this same MDS, R9 is documented as requiring assist of two staff for transfers and toileting. R9's undated and incomplete care plan documents a Focus area of I have an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) Interventions included are, Bed Mobility: The resident requires (Specify what assistance) by (X) staff to turn and reposition in bed (specify frequency) and as necessary toilet use: The resident requires (Specify assistance) by (X) staff for toileting, transfer: The resident requires Mechanical Lift (specify) with (x) staff assistance for transfers. R9's care plan documents a Focus area of I have diabetic ulcer of the (specify location) r/t with interventions that include, Position resident off affected area. Change position every 2 hours and PRN (as needed). On 10/18/22 at 3:00 PM, V8 stated she has told R9 he could talk with V2 (DON) about call light complaints. V8 stated she left a note in V2's office addressed to the Director of Nurses and Administrator for R9. On 11/03/22 at 1:04 PM V2 (DON/Director of Nurses) stated she knew she had gotten notes and/or verbal updates related to R9, but she couldn't remember a specific note related to call lights. On 10/27/22 at 3:00 PM, R9 was observed sitting in his motorized wheelchair in the hallway. R9 entered his room and stated he had been waiting to go to bed for two hours. R9 stated staff come and turn his call light off and then he turns it back on. R9 stated his bottom hurts bad as well as his hips and his legs. R9 stated he has had to wait for them to change his depends and when the urine sits on his skin it burns, like it is right now. R9 stated he has been in his chair since 11:00 AM and he starts hurting about an hour after he gets up. R9 stated the pain just gets worse and worse. R9 stated it makes him angry when they do this and he has never been angry in his life, but they are making him that way when they don't answer the call lights and/or provide care. R9 stated, watch this. R9 pushed his call light at 3:03 PM. This surveyor did continuous observation from inside R9's room. At 3:25 PM this surveyor could hear staff talking in the hallway outside R9's room. Staff entered R9's room at 3:32 PM and R9 told them he wanted to go to bed. They left and returned with a mechanical lift at 3:38 PM. This indicates R9's call light was unanswered from 3:03 PM until 3:32 PM. On 11/10/2022 at 12:15 PM, R9 stated, he would like to report another late call light experience that just happened. R9 stated, today (11/10/22) at about 11:00 AM, he was in bed, turned on his call light wanting to get up, and an unidentified staff member came in the room and shut off his light. R9 stated, he waited and called the nurses station to have them get him up and was told they would send someone to his room. R9 stated, he did not know names of any of the staff because he did not ask and they do not wear name tags. R9 showed his phone to surveyor with a call to the facility at 11:39 AM. R9 stated, at about 12:00 PM he turned on his call light again and a CNA came in and got him up within about 5 minutes. R9 stated, he has reported call light issues to administration before and nothing has been done about it. R9 stated, his roommate (R7) also has issues with staff not answering his call light timely. 3. R6's facility admission Record with a print date of 10/20/22 documents R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include encounter for surgical after care, diabetes, morbid obesity, chronic kidney disease, mild cognitive impairment, hypertension, and necrotizing fasciitis. R6's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 12, which indicates R6 has a moderate cognitive impairment. Section G of R6's MDS documents that R6 requires assist of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. R6's undated care plan documents under the Focus area, I have an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) obesity, DM II (type 2 diabetes), mild cognitive impairment with interventions that include R6 requires extensive assist by 2 staff for toileting and transfer. On 10/18/22 at 5:44 AM, R6's call light was observed on. R6 stated her call light had been on for about 20 minutes. R6 stated that is about the average time it takes for a call light to be answered. R6 stated she has waited for up to four hours before to get assistance to be lifted with the mechanical lift. R6 stated she recently had a catheter removed and has some urge incontinence. R6 stated the light situation is so frustrating. R6 stated staff will come to her room, turn the call light off, say they need to find someone to help them, then leave, and you never know when they will come back. R6's call light remained on throughout the interview with at least one unidentified staff member passing by her room during the interview. R6's call light was observed on and not answered until 6:16 AM. This indicates R6's call light was unanswered by staff for 32 minutes. On 10/18/22 at 3:00 PM, when asked if she had residents complain call lights weren't being answered timely V8 (CNA) stated, Absolutely. V8 stated R6 was very appreciative of the care V8 provided and had reported to V8 that R6 will have a need for something that requires two people such as a mechanical lift transfer and R6 reported it may be up to four hours before she gets assistance. V8 stated she told R6 she could talk with V2 (DON) about it and R6 declined on that day. On 10/25/22 at 10:12 AM, R6 was observed sitting in her recliner in her room with her family at her side. R6 stated she had to wait an hour yesterday (10/24/22) when she needed a mechanical lift to get up. On 10/27/22 at 3:55 PM, R6 was observed sitting in the recliner in her room. When asked if there was any negative impact when it took a while for staff to answer her call light R6 stated, It makes me feel like I don't matter. R6 stated she had a urinary catheter until recently and she is supposed to be doing bladder training since it has been removed. R6 stated it is really hard to train your bladder when it takes two and a ½ hours for them to answer the call light. R6 stated she has been bladder training herself in her incontinence brief. 4. R7's facility admission Record with a print date of 10/26/22 documents R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include acquired absence of left leg below the knee, lack of coordination, diabetes, Mild Intellectual Disabilities, chronic kidney disease, schizoaffective disorder, and hypertension. R7's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 11, which indicates R7 has a moderate cognitive impairment. Under Section G, the same MDS documents R7 requires assist of two staff for transfers and toileting. R7's undated Care Plan documents a Focus area of I have an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t Mild Intellectual disabilities and lack of coordination. Interventions documented on the care plan include, Toilet Use: R7 is dependent on mechanical and 2 staff with toileting at this time. Transfer: R7 is dependent on mechanical lift and 2 staff for transfers between areas as necessary. On 10/25/22 at 2:12 PM, R7 was observed sitting in his room. R7 stated the facility staff don't answer call lights timely. R7 pushed his call light at 2:13 PM. A CNA came into R7's room almost immediately and he told her he was wanting to get up. She stated she would have to get the mechanical lift after other staff were finished using it and would be right back. On 10/25/22 at 2:38 PM, this surveyor observed R7's call light back on. Upon entering the room R7 was observed still laying in bed. R7 stated staff haven't been back in to get him up. On 10/25/22 at 2:42 PM, R7 was observed still in bed, and he stated staff keep coming in and turning his call light off and saying they have to get help and will be right back. At 2:48 PM staff are observed entering R7's room with a mechanical lift. This indicates R7 waited 36 minutes for staff to assist him out of bed. 5. R8's facility admission Record with a print date of 10/20/2022 documents R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. R8's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 14, which indicates R8 is cognitively intact. Section G of R8's MDS documents that R8 requires two-person physical assist for transfers and toileting. R8's undated care plan documents a Focus area I have an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t decreased mobility, lack of coordination with interventions that include R8 requires extensive assist by 2 staff for toileting and R8 requires a mechanical lift with two staff to move between surfaces. R8's care plan documents a Focus area of I am a non-reliable responder with interventions that include, Allow resident to voice perceptions thru active listening, ask open ended questions, investigate resident statements and/or concerns, praise factual statements, redirect with kindness, do not argue with resident. On 10/18/22 at 6:00 AM, 6:15 AM, and 6:21 AM R8's call light is observed on. On 10/18/22 at 6:21 AM, R8 was observed lying in bed. R8 stated the facility staff were supposed to have gotten her up at 5:00 AM. When asked why they were to get her up that early R8 stated Because I wanted to get up. R8 stated she put her light on at 5:00 AM and told the staff last night she wanted to get up at 5. When asked if it normally takes a while for them to answer call lights R8 stated, Oh my God, yes, sometimes 2-3 hours. When asked if anything negative had happened when it took staff awhile to answer her call light R8 stated, wet the bed, pooped the bed. On 10/18/22 at 6:45 AM, staff entered R8's room to assist her up. Aside from R8's verbal report of activating her call light at 5AM, R8's call light was visually seen by this surveyor as unanswered from 6:00 AM until 6:45 AM, indicating her call light was on for 45 minutes. On 10/18/22 at 12:58 PM, V6 (CNA) stated they usually have three CNA's, a shower aide, and a restorative aide on Daisy and two CNA's on Rose. When asked if this is enough staff to provide care for the residents, V6 stated she believed so. When asked why it took so long answer the call lights on the morning of 10/18/22, V6 stated she wasn't sure. V6 stated she wasn't at the facility the whole time. V6 stated she usually gets to the facility around 6:00 AM. V6 stated night shift didn't say anything about the light being on or how long it had been on. On 10/18/22 at 3:00 PM, when asked if 45 minutes was too long for a call light to not be answered, V8 (CNA) stated she thought a call light that was not answered for that long could be dangerous. 6. R20's facility admission Record with a print date of 11/3/22 documents R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 8/3/22. R20's diagnoses listed on the admission Record include Clostridium difficile, diarrhea, anxiety disorder, acute kidney failure, hypertension, cognitive communication deficit, hematuria, vertigo, urinary tract infection, and lack of coordination. R20's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 12, which indicates R20 has a moderate cognitive impairment. The same MDS Section G documents R20 requires assist of two staff for transfers and toileting. R20's facility care plan with a Focus area of I have an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t with interventions of Transfer: R20 requires limited assist by 1 staff at times to move between surfaces as necessary. PT/OT (physical therapy/occupational therapy) evaluation and treatment as per MD (physician) orders. The facility Concern/Compliment Form dated 7/6/22 documents under Nature of Concern/Compliment waited over an hour to be changed, yelling out for help. Resident (R20) say (sic) he wearing (sic) Put in bed and did not change, left me there, change clothes finally this morning. His bottom is red and hurts. On 10/19/22 at 12:55 PM, V10 (Social Services Director) stated R20 was discharged home. V10 stated she was the one who assisted him with his concern. V10 stated R12 had his call light on, and staff came down and put him to bed without changing him. V10 stated they didn't put his pajamas on and left R20 in his clothes. V10 stated R20 had Clostridium Difficile (C-diff) and would sometimes have accidents and he was supposed to get assistance to go to the bathroom. V10 stated R20 reported to her that he knew the staff hear residents hollering all day and night. V10 stated he was a little upset, but he just wanted the facility to know what happened. V10 stated she thought R20's bottom was red and hurting because of the C-diff not because he had been left all night without changing him. V10 stated R20 reported they would pass the call light up and he would yell out and the staff weren't responding to him. V10 stated R20 went an hour until someone came and answered his call light and took him to the bathroom, but he went all night in his clothes. The facility Resident Council meeting minutes documents the following, 5/11/22 Old business .Hard to get help in rooms during mealtimes. 6/8/22 Old Business .Hard to get help in rooms at meal times- Getting better. 7/13/22 .Nursing Call lights- Not answered on timely manner . 8/10/22 .Nursing: Call lights not getting answered timely. 9/14/22 .Nursing: .Call lights looked (sic) 10/12/22 .Nursing: Good- Still need work on call lights. Residents waiting long periods to be laid down. The facility Complaint Resolution Form dated 7/13/22 documents, Problem: Call lights- Not answered on a timely manner. Department: Nursing. Resolution: Call light education for staff on 7/25/22. The facility Complaint Resolution Form dated 8/10/22 documents, Problem: .Call light not answered timely manner .Resolution: call light response time will be monitored . There were no other Complaint Resolution Forms provided to this surveyor. On 10/19/22 at 12:55 PM, V10 (Social Services Director) stated she was responsible for reviewing and following up with some of the facility grievances/resident council meeting concerns. V10 stated they have had concerns with call lights not being answered timely brought up in resident council meetings. Reviewed with V10 the resident council meeting minutes that document concerns for the past four months. When asked what the facility has done to address the call light concerns V10 stated they had educated staff, including non-nursing staff that anyone can answer the call light. V10 stated if the person that answers the call light is not able to fulfill the need, they should pass it on to the nursing staff and then follow up with the resident in 15 minutes to ensure the need was met. V10 stated she also knows the facility did a questionnaire and an in-service, but she wasn't involved in implementing those. On 10/20/22 at 6:45 AM, when asked if she knew why call lights weren't being answered timely, V14 (LPN), stated if they put the call light on when supper trays go out or in the morning when people are getting up it may extend the time it takes to answer them. On 10/21/22 at 1:55 PM, when asked how quickly call lights should be answered V2 (DON) stated, In a timely fashion. V2 stated they have educated staff on answering call lights timely and are implementing nursing staff and CNA staff to come in at different times so they can monitor call lights better. V2 stated they did a call light audit, but she felt it would be more accurate if they had a different system. V2 stated she has also come to the facility at different times at night to audit call lights. On 10/26/22 at 9:41 AM, when asked when he became aware call lights weren't being answered timely and what the facility did about it, V1 stated, the majority of call lights happen all at the same time. V1 stated that is when everyone wants to lay down or get up. V1 stated he has tried to teach staff to prioritize call lights and they have done call light audits. V1 stated it usually takes them about 10 minutes on average to answer the lights. This surveyor informed V1 that call light observations revealed they weren't answered for 30-45 minutes on the morning of 10/18/22, and he stated that is when everyone wants to get up and the nursing staff are doing their rounds during that time frame. When asked if that was an appropriate time frame for call lights to be answered V1 stated he would like to see them answered sooner than that. This surveyor informed V1 that R8 stated she wanted to get up at 5:00 AM and V1 stated that was funny because R8 never wanted to get up early. When asked if he thought R8 really didn't want to get up early V1 stated, No. She (R8) is one who could lay in bed all day and never want to get up. When asked what his expectation would be in the situation where staff turn the call light off, leave, and don't come back, V1 stated he would expect them to go back and finish the task or leave the call light on until the need is met. Reviewed with V1 the observation on 10/25/22 of staff telling R7 they would have to wait for the mechanical lift and V1 stated, maybe the battery wasn't charged on the mechanical lift, or some staff don't like to use the manual lift, or one resident takes a lot longer to transfer. When asked if that was an acceptable time frame to wait to get up, V1 stated he would like it to be sooner, but it just depends on the circumstances. On 11/04/22 at 3:21 PM, V2 stated there is no specific time frame that call lights are to be answered in the facility call light policy. When asked how staff know what the expectations are regarding how quickly a call light should be answered, V2 stated, they should just be prioritized by what resident needs, need to be met first. The facility Call Light policy dated 11/28/12 documents, Purpose: To respond to residents' requests and needs in a timely and courteous manner. Guidelines: Resident call lights will be answered in timely manner. 1. All residents that have the ability to use a call light shall have the nurse call light system at all times and within easy accessibility to the resident at the bedside or other reasonable accessible location. 2. All staff should assist in answering call lights. Nursing staff members shall go to resident respond to call system and promptly cancel the call light when the room is entered. 3. Bathroom lights should be viewed as emergencies and immediate attention will be given. 4. Requests shall be responded to in a courteous and professional manner. 5. Hand bells will be provided for alert dependent residents when position out of reach of permanent call light when needed. 6. Call bell system defects will be reported promptly to the Maintenance Department. Check room frequently until system is repaired . The facility Daily Census dated 10/16/22 given to this surveyor on 10/18/22 documents 67 residents reside at the facility.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0604 (Tag F0604)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were not restrained for staff conveni...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were not restrained for staff convenience for 1 of 3 (R3) residents reviewed for restraints in the sample of 20. R3 who has a severe cognitive impairment, had a fall on night shift, was unsteady on his feet, and refusing to stay in bed. Facility staff placed R3's mattress on the floor and placed R3 on his mattress. R3 was unable to stand up from the floor and crawled on his hands and knees to the door and asked for help. A reasonable person would have felt humiliation, fear, had loss of dignity, anxiety, and agitation, as well feelings of being dehumanized by being placed in a position they were only able to crawl away from. Findings Include: R3's admission Record with a print date of 10/20/22 documents R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's Disease, dementia, hypothyroidism, dysphagia, brief psychotic disorder, chronic kidney disease, mood disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. R3's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 9/8/22 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 01, which indicates R3 has a severe cognitive impairment. R3's same MDS documents R3 requires assist of two staff for bed mobility and transfers. Under balance during transitions and walking, R3's MDS documents R3 is not steady, only able to stabilize with staff assistance. Under Functional Abilities R3's MDS documents, to go from lying to sitting on side of bed R3 requires partial/moderate assistance. R3's Restorative Observations dated 9/14/22 documents R3 is able to voluntarily move or reposition in bed and no restraints are in use. Under Care Plan it documents (R3) is able to turn side to side, go from lying to sitting and sitting to lying with supervision and verbal cues of staff at times. R3 is supervision for transfers and supervision for locomotion and mobility at times. R3's progress notes document, 9/9/22 6:25 PM Resident had a witnessed fall 09/09/2022 6:25 PM Location of fall: Residents room, Res (resident) found on floor in room and noted to have a small laceration to back of head, approx. (approximately) 3 cm. Resident assisted up and onto bed. Refuses to stay in bed, gait is unsteady and leaning backwards. Alert and disoriented per usual baseline. Assisted into bed but refuses to stay. Interventions: Mattress put on floor. R3's Fall IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) Note dated 9/12/22 10:10 AM documents, Resident observed laying on floor in room, noted to have hematoma and laceration approx. 3 cm to back of head. Moves all ext (extremities) without difficulty or c/o (complaints of). Hollering get me up. Denies any c/o (complaints of) of discomfort. Neuro (neurological) checks initiated and WNL (within normal limits). Assisted up x (times) 2 staff and amb (ambulated) to bed. Refuses to stay in bed. Ambulating per self, gait is unsteady, and resident is leaning backwards when walking. Root Cause of fall: Resident lost balance, ambulating without assistance. Intervention and care plan updated: Resident moved to room right across from nurse's station for increased monitoring. On 10/20/22 at 9:52 AM, V15 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, one-night (date unknown), R3 fell and bumped his head and she put his mattress on the floor that night. V15 stated R3 had a 2-3 cm laceration on the back of his head. V15 stated she did neuro (neurological) checks, fall monitoring, and behavior monitoring, called the physician, and gave R3 snacks. When asked how putting the mattress on the floor helped, V15 stated, Well he wasn't able to get up. V15 stated she was the only one on that unit and she wasn't able to properly supervise R3. V15 stated the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) working with her on that night got sick and left the facility around 2:00 AM. V15 stated she tried to call people in, but no one was able to. V15 stated it is not typical to only have one staff member working on the unit. On 10/20/22 at 12:46 PM, this surveyor informed V2 (DON/Director of Nurses), of V15's interview of putting R3's mattress on the floor and V15 stated R3 couldn't get up. V2 stated she would consider putting R3's mattress on the floor a restraint and R3 isn't assessed for needing restraints. A statement by V15 dated 10/20/22 that was provided to this surveyor by V1 (Administrator) and V2 (DON) documents, I spoke with the state surveyor concerning R3 the night he fell, I was alone on unit as the CNA scheduled was sick and left. R3 was restless, refusing to stay in bed. I told her he was restless, refusing to stay in bed. I also had told her I walked with him, gave him snacks and attempted to sit with him to calm him down. Ineffective. He was leaning backwards while walking and balance was very poor and put his mattress on floor for his safety r/t (related to) balance and restlessness and attempting other redirection without success. On 10/21/22 at 12:02 PM, V20 (RN/Registered Nurse) stated she had never seen R3's mattress on the floor. V20 stated R3 would be able to get up from the floor without assistance. V20 stated she had never seen R3 get up from the floor, but he got out of his bed that was in a low position without assistance. On 10/26/22 at 1:08 PM, V23 (MDS Coordinator/Certified Restorative Nurse) stated he does restorative assessments on the residents and last assessed R3 on 9/14/22. V23 stated he saw R3 walking in the hallways after that assessment and wasn't aware of a decline in his functional capabilities. V23 stated he believed R3 could get up off the floor. V23 stated he believed R3 would have to crawl to some type of support to get up but that he could get up, once he had the support of a bed, wall, or chair. On 10/21/22 at 1:55 PM, when asked why R3's mattress wasn't still on the floor V2 (DON) stated they probably moved it after that because they came up with a different intervention. V2 stated they probably changed it because it didn't work, and they didn't want R3 to trip over it. On 10/26/22 at 9:41 AM, V1 (Administrator) was asked about R3's mattress being put on the floor as an intervention. V1 stated (V15) ensured the safety of the resident, and he was good with the mattress being on the floor, if it was being used as a safety measure. V1 stated he thought increased monitoring would have ensured R3's safety, so his mattress wouldn't have to be put on the floor. On 11/01/22 at 4:20 PM, V15 (LPN) stated on 9/9/22 after she had moved R3's mattress to the floor R3 was able to get off the mattress and, did in fact get off it, while she was working that night. V15 stated R3 crawled on his hands and knees to the door of his room and asked for help. V15 stated she had to go to the other side to get another nurse to assist her in getting R3 off the floor. V15 stated she did not believe it would have been safe for her to assist R3 off the floor by herself. V15 stated she put R3 back in his bed and she believed he stayed there the remainder of the night. R3's undated Care Plan documents a Focus area of I am at High risk for falls r/t (related to) dementia, reduce safety awareness and wandering behaviors. Goal: All falls will be reviewed by the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) through next review. Interventions documented on the care plan are as follows, 4/29/19- Be Sure R3's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. The resident needs prompt response to all requests for assistance. Educate the resident/family/caregivers about safety reminders and what to do if a fall occurs. Encourage R3 to participate in activities that promote exercise, physical activity for strengthening and improved mobility such as: walking to meals and activities. Review information on past falls and attempt to determine cause of falls. Record possible root causes. After remove any potential causes if possible. Educate resident/family/caregivers/IDT as to causes. 5/2/2019- Staff educated to make sure all personal items including water glass on the bed side table are in reach when in bed. 12/17/19-Sign (tractor) to be put on R3's door to assist him while finding is (sic) room. 12/27/19- R3 needs activities that minimize the potential for falls while providing diversion and distraction. 3/4/20-Remove all tripping hazards from room at this time. 4/13/20- Staff to ensure that R3 has all items in reach when eating. 7/13/20-Encourage R3 is (sic) wearing appropriate footwear non-skid socks or shoes when ambulating as he allows. 12/15/21- Ensure rolling desk chair is securely pushed up under desk. Place stationary chair behind nurse's station. 9/12/22-R3 room relocated closer to nurse's station to increase monitoring. 10/19/22- Night light added to R3's room to decrease falls. 10/10/22-Staff to offer assistance when R3 is ambulating as he will allow. There is no restraint focus area documented on R3's undated care plan. The facility Abuse Prevention and Reporting - Illinois policy dated 11/28/16 documents, Guidelines: The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure falls were investigated, new and/or appropriate...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure falls were investigated, new and/or appropriate interventions to prevent falls were implemented, and appropriate levels of supervision were in place to prevent injury for 4 of 4 residents (R2, R3, R4, and R5) in the sample of 20 investigated for falls. This failure resulted in R3 having four falls from 9/9/22 to 10/19/22 that resulted in hematomas and lacerations to his head with neurological checks not completed per facility policy, multiple bruises and cuts, and a subsequent stay at a mental health facility for a medication evaluation and adjustment. Findings Include: 1.R3's admission Record with a print date of 10/20/22 documents R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's Disease, dementia, hypothyroidism, dysphagia, brief psychotic disorder, chronic kidney disease, mood disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. R3's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 01, which indicates R3 has a severe cognitive impairment. R3's same MDS documents R3 requires assist of two staff for bed mobility and transfers. Under balance during transitions and walking R3's MDS documents R3 is not steady, only able to stabilize with staff assistance. Under Functional Abilities R3's MDS documents to go from lying to sitting on side of bed R3 requires partial/moderate assistance. R3's Restorative Observations dated 9/14/22 documents R3 is able to voluntarily move or reposition in bed and no restraints are in use. Under Care Plan it documents (R3) is able to turn side to side, go from lying to sitting and sitting to lying with supervision and verbal cues of staff at times. R3 is supervision for transfers and supervision for locomotion and mobility at times. R3's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents a score of 12, which indicates R3 is at risk for falls. The facility fall risk assessment does not document if someone is at low, moderate, or high risk for falls. It documents if someone is at risk or not at risk for falls. R3's undated Care Plan documents a Focus area of I am at High risk for falls r/t (related to) dementia, reduce safety awareness and wandering behaviors. Goal: All falls will be reviewed by the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) through next review, Interventions: Be Sure R3's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed (date initiated 4/29/19). The resident needs prompt response to all requests for assistance (date initiated 4/29/19). Educate the resident/family/caregivers about safety reminders and what to do if a fall occurs (date initiated 4/29/19). Encourage R3 is (sic) wearing appropriate footwear non-skid socks or shoes when ambulating as he allows (date initiated 7/13/2020). Encourage R3 to participate in activities that promote exercise, physical activity for strengthening and improved mobility such as: walking to meals and activities (date initiated 4/29/19). Ensure rolling desk chair is securely pushed up under desk. Place stationary chair behind nurse's station (date initiated 12/15/21). Night light added to R3's room to decrease falls (date initiated 10/19/22). Remove all tripping hazards from room at this time (date initiated 3/4/20). Review information on past falls and attempt to determine cause of falls. Record possible root causes. After remove any potential causes if possible. Educate resident/family/caregivers/IDT as to causes (date initiated 4/29/19). R3 needs activities that minimize the potential for falls while providing diversion and distraction (date initiated 12/27/19). R3 room relocated closer to nurse's station to increase monitoring (date initiated 9/12/22). Sign (tractor) to be put on R3's door to assist him while finding is (sic) room (date initiated 12/17/19). Staff educated to make sure all personal items including water glass on the bed side table are in reach when in bed (date initiated 5/2/19). Staff to ensure that R3 has all items in reach when eating (date initiated 4/13/20). Staff to offer assistance when R3 is ambulating as he will allow (date initiated 10/10/22). A) R3's progress notes documents, 9/9/22 6:25 PM Resident had a witnessed fall 09/09/2022 6:25 PM Location of fall: Residents room, Res (resident) found on floor in room and noted to have a small laceration to back of head, approx. (approximately) 3 cm. Area slightly raised, dry drsg (dressing) applied. Resident assisted up and onto bed. Refuses to stay in bed, gait is unsteady and leaning backwards. No other signs of injuries present on 09/09/2022 6:25 PM. Assessment Unwitnessed fall, neurological checks initiated. Alert and disoriented per usual baseline. No changes in range of motion from normal baseline. New injury observed. Laceration to back of head approx. (approximately) 3 cm. Actions Taken: Dry drsg to back of head. Assisted into bed but refuses to stay. Interventions: Mattress put on floor. This progress note documents the fall as both witnessed and unwitnessed. The note then documents R3 was found on the floor in his room indicating it was an un-witnessed fall. R3's neurological (neuro) checks were reviewed, and documents neuro assessments were completed on 9/9/22 at 6:40 PM, 6:55 PM, 7:25 PM, 7:55 PM, 8:05 PM, 8:35 PM, and 12:00 AM. Neuro checks were documented as completed on 9/10/22 at 12:35 AM and 8:35 PM. All neurological checks documented have vital signs dated 9/9/22 at 6:25 PM and a pain assessment dated [DATE] at 2:48 AM. This indicates R3 did not have neurological checks done 10 times during the 72-hour post fall period. The neurological checks also document R3's vital signs and pain assessment were completed once in the same 72-hour post fall period. R3's Fall IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) Note dated 9/12/22 10:10 AM documents, Resident observed laying on floor in room, noted to have hematoma and laceration approx. 3 cm to back of head. Moves all ext (extremities) without difficulty or c/o (complaints of). Hollering get me up. Denies any c/o (complaints of) of discomfort. Neuro checks initiated and WNL (within normal limits). Assisted up x (times) 2 staff and amb (ambulated) to bed. Refuses to stay in bed. Ambulating per self, gait is unsteady, and resident is leaning backwards when walking. Root Cause of fall: Resident lost balance, ambulating without assistance. Intervention and care plan updated: Resident moved to room right across from nurse's station for increased monitoring. On 10/20/22 at 9:52 AM, V15 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated one-night (date unknown) R3 fell and bumped his head and she put his mattress on the floor that night. V15 stated R3 had a 2-3 cm laceration on the back of his head. V15 stated she did neuro checks, fall monitoring, and behavior monitoring, called the physician, and gave R3 snacks. When asked how putting the mattress on the floor helped, V15 stated, Well he wasn't able to get up. V15 stated she was the only one on that unit and she wasn't able to properly supervise R3. V15 stated the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) working with her on that night got sick and left the facility around 2:00 AM. V15 stated she tried to call people in, but no one was able to. V15 stated it is not typical to only have one staff member working on the unit. On 10/20/22 at 12:46 PM this surveyor informed V2 (DON/Director of Nurses), of V15's interview of putting R3's mattress on the floor and V15 saying R3 couldn't get up. V2 stated she wasn't aware of them only having one nurse on the unit and no CNA's. V2 stated she would expect facility staff to call her if that happened. V2 stated she would consider putting R3's mattress on the floor a restraint and R3 isn't assessed for needing restraints. A statement by V15 dated 10/20/22 that was provided to this surveyor by V1 (Administrator) and V2 (DON) documents, I spoke with the state surveyor concerning R3 the night he fell, I was alone on unit as the CNA scheduled was sick and left. R3 was restless, refusing to stay in bed. I told her he was restless, refusing to stay in bed. I also had told her I walked with him, gave him snacks and attempted to sit with him to calm him down. Ineffective. He was leaning backwards while walking and balance was very poor and put his mattress on floor for his safety r/t (related to) balance and restlessness and attempting other redirection without success. On 10/21/22 at 12:02 PM, V20 (RN/Registered Nurse) stated she had never seen R3's mattress on the floor. V20 stated R3 would be able to get up from the floor without assistance. V20 stated she had never seen R3 get up from the floor, but he got out of his bed that was in a low position without assistance. On 10/26/22 at 1:08 PM, V23 (MDS Coordinator/Certified Restorative Nurse) stated he does restorative assessments on the residents and last assessed R3 on 9/14/22. V23 stated he saw R3 walking in the hallways after that assessment and wasn't aware of a decline in his functional capabilities. V23 stated he believed R3 could get up off the floor. V23 stated he believed R3 would have to crawl to some type of support to get up but that he could get up, once he had the support of a bed, wall, or chair. On 10/21/22 at 1:55 PM when asked why R3's mattress wasn't still on the floor V2 (DON) stated they probably moved it after that because they came up with a different intervention. V2 stated they probably changed it because it didn't work, and they didn't want R3 to trip over it. On 10/26/22 at 9:41 AM when asked about R3's mattress being put on the floor, V1 (Administrator) stated, she (V15) ensured the safety of the resident. V1 stated he was good with the mattress being on the floor, if it was being used as a safety measure, but he thought increased monitoring would ensure that, so you didn't have to put the mattress on the floor. When asked if he was aware the CNA had to go home and there was only one staff member on the unit V1 stated he was not. V1 stated there were three CNA's working on the other halls and they would have floated over to that unit to help. On 11/01/22 at 4:20 PM, V15 (LPN) stated on 9/9/22 after she had moved R3's mattress to the floor R3 was able to get off the mattress and did in fact get off it while she was working that night. V15 stated R3 crawled on his hands and knees to the door of his room and asked for help. V15 stated she had to go to the other side to get another nurse to assist her in getting R3 off the floor. V15 stated she did not believe it would have been safe for her to assist R3 off the floor by herself. V15 stated she put R3 back on his mattress that was still located on the floor, and she believed he stayed there the remainder of the night. When asked if that was the only time another staff member came to the unit to assist her, V15 stated the other nurse came over to the unit around 5:30 AM so she could go to the other side to pass medications. When asked if she notified V1 or V2 she was the only staff working on the unit V15 stated the other nurse made the calls since she had been working at the facility longer and she knew she had attempted to call staff in but wasn't sure if she had attempted to call V1 or V2. B) R3's unwitnessed fall report dated 9/23/22 documents, R3 was asleep in room with door to room closed. CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was sitting at the nurse's station desk and she seen the resident open up his door. The resident had blood all over himself, the floor, and his bed, appearing to come from an open area on the back of his head, that also includes a knot area. Resident unable to give description. Description: The CNA called this nurse. and this nurse preformed an assessment, as able, due to resident's dementia and combative behavior. He appeared to be alert with confusion, able to stand and walk around and get in and out of his bed. The blood appeared to come from an open area to the back of his head. His vital signs were taken and he was assisted to the shower by 2 CNA's. Resident was very angry with getting a shower, he was yelling and hitting staff while shower was in progress Resident taken to hospital: Laceration back of head R3's Fall IDT Note dated 9/23/22 documents Intervention and care plan updated: Staff education for making sure door is open when not doing resident care. R3's neurological checks were reviewed, and documents neuro assessments were done on 9/23/22 at 3:45 AM, 6:30 AM, 10:30 AM, 2:30 PM, 6:30 PM, and 10:30 PM; and on 9/24/22 at 2:30 AM, 6:30 AM, and 2:30 PM, 9:25/22 at 6:30 AM and 2:30 PM. This indicates R3 did not have neurological assessments completed 7 times in the 72-hour post fall period. C) R3's 10/08/22 witnessed fall report documents, R3 was walking down hall and lost balance and fell to right side onto floor, resident did not hit head. Immediate Action Taken: Resident trying to get self-up, staff helped resident up after assessed. No injuries at time of incident. R3's Fall IDT Note dated 10/10/22 documents, Intervention and care plan updated: Staff to assist resident with ambulation as he allows. D) On 10/18/22 at 6:42 AM, R3 was observed walking the length of the dining room and out into the hallway. R3 was wearing pajamas and no shoes. R3 was unsteady and stumbling some during this observation. R3 had dried blood on his shirt on the top of his left shoulder, on his left ear, and on his neck behind his left ear. There were no staff observed in the dining room or in the hallway. This surveyor noted V7 (CNA) behind the nurse's station in a small room eating breakfast. This surveyor notified V7 of the blood and she stated she thought the blood on his shirt was dried blood. This surveyor agreed with her that it was dried blood and pointed out the blood on R3's ear and neck. V7 stated she didn't know if it was something new and walked with R3 to a room located down the hall, not near the nurse's station. She then went back to the small room behind the nurse's station and began eating. R3 was observed two more times throughout the day on 10/18/22, both times he was in bed. Immediately following this observation and throughout the day on 10/18/22, R3's medical record was reviewed and did not document incident reports, assessments, or follow up related to the dried blood on R3's left ear/neck. On 10/18/22 at 1:30 PM, V7 (CNA) stated R3 had been really combative on 10/18/22. V7 stated they told the nurse about his ear, and she thinks maybe he scratched it. V7 stated they tried cleaning his ear, but he wouldn't let them. When asked if she was aware of any recent fall, V7 stated, there was nothing in report and nothing happened on day shift on 10/18/22. (The most recent fall documented in R3's record was on 10/08/22.) On 10/20/22 at 6:30 AM, V13 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated she didn't know what happened to R3's left ear. On 10/21/22 at 10:05 AM, V18 (CNA) stated she had provided care to R3 but not when he had any falls. When asked if she knew what happened to R3's ear V18 stated she had no clue. On 10/20/22 at 11:51 AM, V17 (LPN) stated she worked on Tuesday 10/18/22. When asked if she knew what happened to R3's ear V17 stated, just what she was told, that he had hit it on his bed or something the night before. (There is no documentation in R3's medical record of him hitting his head on the bed on 10/17/22). On 10/20/22 at 12:46 PM when asked about the injury to R3's ear V2 (DON) stated there was always an ongoing investigation for R3. When asked if I could see the investigation V2 stated she didn't have anything written on it that she could give me. After this interview V2 provided this surveyor with the following documentation on 10/20/22. R3's Skin Tear report dated 10/18/22 4:45 PM documents, Resident ambulating falling back to hit the closet door with his left arm causing multiple skin tears to upper-elbow-forearm of left arm, wounds cleansed with wound cleanser non adhere drsg (dressing) applied arm wrapped with cling wrap and secured with tape. R3's Progress note dated 10/18/22 at 5:22 PM Resident has been very restless, hitting the doors and walls with his hands, difficulty with sitting still, resident was in his old room and fell back against the closet doors and caused skin tears to back side of upper middle and lower left arm, combative with staff when trying to provide care, hitting, kicking, pinching, and biting at staff. Notified V4 (Physician) with new order received to give PM dose of Valium now and hold tonight dose. Notified ADON (Assistant Director of Nurses) and POA (power of attorney) of health care with a return call from (family member) with update on condition. Staff assist to DR (dining room) for supper meal resident unable to sit long enough to eat, carried around bowl of peas to eat. The skin tear report dated 10/18/22 at 4:45 PM and the progress note dated 10/18/22 at 5:22 PM indicate R3 did not have documentation in his medical record related to a fall prior to the observation on 10/18/22 at 6:42 AM that would account for the dried blood on his ear/neck. Upon requesting the investigation for the areas on R3's neck/ear this surveyor was provided with the following progress note. R3's 10/20/22 8:48 AM progress note documents, Resident had fall, struck side of bed on LT (left) side of head, scratches to LT side of ear which is consistent with striking head on bed on LT side, Injury with dried blood was noticed within one day, healing was already taking place which is consistent with time of fall. This report has handwritten on it, From 10/18/22 fall This information is consistent with the information provided by V17 (LPN) in her interview on 10/19/22 at 11:51 AM. There is no other documentation in R3's medical record related to follow up, neurological checks, or new interventions related to a fall where R3 hit his head on his bed. R3's Injury of Known report with the date cut off and not readable documents Resident had a fall where he struck the left side of his head, scratch is on left side of head. This report was given to this surveyor with R3's progress notes dated 10/20/22 8:48 AM, attached to it. When asked for a copy of this report with the date viewable received the following risk management report from V2. R3's Risk Management report dated 10/20/22 8:48 AM documents, Resident had a scratch to left ear. Under Description of Action Taken the report documents, Resident had a fall where he struck the left side of his head, scratch is on left side of head. On 11/02/22 at 4:32 PM, V1 and V2 were asked to clarify the discrepancies in the progress notes, skin tear report, and risk management report. They stated they would see what they could find. As of 11/03/22 they had not provided this surveyor with any other information. On 11/04/22 at 9:49 AM spoke with V1 and V2 and explained that I needed clarification related to the different reports on R3's fall related to the area on his ear. V2 stated she had sent me the report with handwritten information at the bottom of the report. V2 stated she would see what else they had and send it to me. On 11/04/22 at 11:46 AM received an email with an Investigation of Skin Tear, Bruises, and Abrasions attached dated 10/18/22. The report documents the location as left ear with no description of injury documented. The report documents R3 had several recent falls et (and) behaviors. Handwritten at the bottom of the report it documents, We do weekly skin assessments, done 10/11/22, then 10/18/22. After wound was cleaned, it was a small scratch. R3 has many behaviors, including beating on walls and doors, tearing fixtures off of wall. R3's frequently taking clothes off, refuses to have nails trimmed, so resident does scratch self often. Scratch is consistent with resident behavior. Blood spot was found on resident pillowcase, consistent with scratch. On 11/4/22 at 12:50 PM spoke with V1 and V2 related to the information provided in the email dated 11/4/22 at 11:46 AM. V2 stated R3 did not have any behaviors or falls on 10/17/22. V2 stated the skin tear report dated 10/18/22 at 4:45 PM and the progress note dated 10/18/22 at 5:52 PM are referencing the same incident that occurred at 4:45 PM. V2 stated she thinks the progress note dated 10/20/22 at 8:48 AM was when she was talking with nurses and trying to determine where the dried blood on R3's ear and neck had come from. V2 stated she assumed it came from the other fall. When asked what other fall she was referencing she stated the nurses had told her R3 had fallen by his bed. V2 then stated R3 didn't actually fall and hit his head on his bed, but she believes he scratched his ear while in bed. E) R3's progress notes document the following on 10/19/22 at 7:27 AM Resident up and down this shift, after fall resident made one on one so he would have supervision to prevent further falls, no s/s (signs of symptoms) of distress noted will cont (continue) to monitor. This is signed by V13 midnight shift nurse and is not documented as a late entry. R3's progress note dated 10/19/22 at 8:05 AM Nurse contacted MD (physician) about resident behavior. New order rec'd (received) to give Valium early et (and) hold bedtime dose. This is signed by V2 (DON). On 10/19/22 at 10:30 AM this surveyor with V8 (CNA) present observed R3 lying in bed. R3 had a large red and purple hematoma on the left side of his head that went from the top of his forehead down his nose and across his face covering his left eye. When asked what happened V8 stated R3 had fallen last night but she didn't have any of the details. R3's Un-witnessed fall report dated 10/18/22 at 6:30 PM documents This nurse was at nurse's station getting report, other nurse helped resident to bed, staff heard resident yelling help sitting in floor on bottom, trying to get up, resident noted to have hematoma to left forehead. Under description the report documents resident helped to feet and bed; ice applied to forehead. R3's 10/19/22 3:47 PM Fall IDT Note documents, This nurse was at nurse's station getting report other nurse helped resident to bed, staff heard resident yelling help sitting in floor on bottom, trying to get up, resident noted to have hematoma to left forehead. Root Cause of Fall: Resident in dark room. Intervention and care plan updated: Night light placed in resident's room to better see when room is dark. On 10/20/22 at 6:30 AM, V13 (LPN) stated she was working recently (unsure of date) when R3 had a fall. V13 stated they were in the middle of report, and she got up because R3 had been walking to the door and she put R3 in bed. V13 stated she continued to give report and then heard R3 say help me. V13 stated R3 was sitting on his bottom with a hematoma on his forehead. V13 stated she had one of the girls sit with him one to one after that and made sure the chairs were out of his room. On 10/19/22 at 11:51 AM when asked if she felt they had enough staff to provide care for R3, V17 stated, No I think he would need to be 1:1 to prevent falls and/or behaviors. On 10/19/22 at 1:35 PM, V12 (LPN) stated R3 did not have one to one ongoing but they are doing frequent checks on R3. V12 stated the one to one stopped about 7:00 AM on 10/19/22. On 10/21/22 at 1:55 PM when asked how R3 fell and got a hematoma to his head on 10/19/22 if he was 1:1, V2 stated, That is a good question. When asked if he was supposed to be 1:1 at the time of the fall on 10/19/22, V2 stated they had sitters for R3 since the night of 10/18/22. When asked if she knew where R3's one to one sitter was when he fell on [DATE], V2 stated she hadn't looked into it yet. Reviewed R3's progress notes with V2 and she stated he should have been one to one at the time of the second fall. V2 then stated she doesn't know where the nurse got the order from and R3 probably fell during report. On 10/25/22 at 12:19 PM when asked if she had any more information on R3 having a 1:1 sitter when he fell on [DATE], V2 stated she did not. V2 stated she knew the staff kept an eye on R3 but there was no documentation of 1:1 monitoring. When asked if he was supposed to be 1:1 monitoring at the time of the fall V2 stated, Yes the nurse had implemented it. When asked if there was someone with R3 when he fell V2 stated he would have been right there, someone would have been close to him. When asked if there was a staff member right with R3 when he fell V2 stated it didn't seem like it. V2 stated she couldn't say for sure since she wasn't there, but it wasn't documented. On 10/26/22 at 12:46 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated R3 was made 1:1 short term on night shift on 10/18/22 after he fell and that when the IDT team met, they changed the intervention to a place a night light in his room since it was dark. V1 stated any resident who is to be placed 1:1 would be approved through him so he could get more staff to assist with monitoring and R3 had not been one to one other than the short time after a fall. This indicates R3's progress notes document on 10/19/22 at 7:27 AM R3 had a fall and the intervention implemented was 1:1 staff. R3's un-witnessed fall report documents the fall on 10/18/22 at 6:32 PM. R3's 10/19/22 7:27 AM progress note does not document if it is a late entry and referencing the fall on 10/18/22 at 6:32 PM. V2's interview documents R3 was 1:1 with sitters beginning on 10/18/22. V2 did not investigate if R3 was supposed to have had a 1:1 sitter and if so where the 1:1 sitter was at the time of the fall on 10/19/22. F) On 10/19/22 at 3:45 PM, R3 was observed sitting on the side of a bed with no sheets on it, wearing torn pajama pants, a dressing was observed to R3's left hand, a hematoma to R3's left forehead, left cheek and left eye area is black/red/blue. R3 doesn't speak to this surveyor. There is a recliner next to the bed with the footrest raised and blankets in the recliner. V31 (LPN) was present with this surveyor and stated to R3 that he had gotten out of the recliner. V31 attempted to redirect R3 when he stood up from the bed. R3 was very unsteady on his feet. R3's soles of his feet were either bruised or dirty and there were scratches observed on the side of R3's left foot. R3's progress notes document on 10/11/22 at 10:00 PM, Weekly skin observation completed for R3. Skin is warm, dry, within normal limits. Skin turgor is good. Skin Concerns: Skin concerns observed: Back of head-scabbed area from recent fall. No s/s of infection. No swelling, Skin concerns observed are not new. This skin assessment does not document any other areas observed to R3's skin. R3's progress notes document on 10/19/22 at 4:01 PM Skin assessment completed today and V4 (Physician) notified for treatments for skin tears. Skin tear noted left wrist, old skin tear noted to left second digit and slight bruising starting around it. 3 skin tears noted near left elbow area, left upper forearm has a skin tear, old skin tear noted on right wrist, bruise noted on left shoulder area pinkish purple in color, right lower back has a small scab noted, abrasion noted behind left ear/neck, left lower ear lobe has a small open area like skin tear, bruising pinkish purple noted to center of upper chest, right buttocks and right post thigh has bruising and it is spreading to other side of buttocks and starting to go down scrotum and lower back, back of scalp has a small scabbed area left eye and cheek and forehead has dark purple pinkish red bruising and eye lids are swollen and left eye is reddened, right lower ext (extremity) has a small scab approx. (approximately) 1.5 cm ( centimeter), left lower ext has a small scab approx. 0.5 cm long, few small scattered bruises noted to bil (bilateral) hands, pinkish purple bruising noted to right temple area and right side forehead. On 10/20/22 at 6:30 AM when asked if they had enough staff to provide care for R3, V13 (LPN) stated, Sometimes. V13 stated lately R3 had not been easily redirected and she thinks it started when he started the Valium. V13 stated R3's feet aren't bruised they are just dirty because he refuses to cover his feet On 10/26/22 at 9:41 AM when asked if he investigated the injuries of unknown origins including the bruises noted on R3's skin assessment from 10/19/22, V1 (Administrator) stated they were just going by the several falls that he had and his picking. V1 stated R3's behaviors have been escalating for the past month. When asked how he knew the injuries came from the falls/behaviors and didn't come from abuse, V1 stated, I interview, I look at the bruising, the type of bruising, and determine if it is consistent with the fall. When asked for that investigation documenting those findings, V1 stated he didn't have one in writing, but he could write it up for me. On 11/0/1/22 at 5:36 PM, V1 provided this surveyor with the following investigations: R3's Investigation of skin tear, bruises, abrasions dated 10/18/22 documents left ear under location with no type or description of injury documented. The areas of First noted by whom, Date, Time, Date/Shift of last shower, and transfer status, Equipment, any new assistive devices or equipment, any signs/symptoms of infection, Resident interview, Most likely cause, Staff interviews conducted, New intervention, Care plan updated, Investigation Completed by, Date, and Reviewed by Administrator are all blank. Under Recent Fall or injury-date and specifics it documents, several recent falls et (and) behaviors. Handwritten at the bottom of the report it documents, We do weekly skin assessments, done 10/11/22, then 10/18/22. After wound was cleaned it was a small scratch. R3 has many behaviors including beating on walls et doors, tearing fixtures off of wall. Resident frequently taking clothes off, refuses to have nails trimmed, so resident does scratch self often. Scratch is consistent with resident behaviors. Blood spot was found on resident pillowcase consistent with scratch. V1 (Administrator) verified via email on 11/07/22 at 11:49 AM the skin assessment referred to in this investigation is the same as the assessment dated [DATE]. V1 stated the assessment was started on 10/18/22 and completed on 10/19/22. R3's Investigation of Skin Tear, Bruises, and Abrasions dated 10/08/22 documents a bruise to right posterior thigh. Under description of area, it documents right side. Under Resident Fall or injury- date and specifics the report documents, Resident had recent fall 10/8/22 in hallway landing on right side. The following areas are blank on the report, Recent IV therapy, Recent LOA (leave of absence) with family, Equipment, any new assistive devices or equipment, any signs/symptoms of infection, Resident interview, most likely cause, staff interview conducted, new interventions implemented, and care plan updated. With no person documented under Investigation completed by and no date of completion documented. R3's Investigation of Skin Tear, Bruises, and Abrasions dated 10/19/22 documents a bruise to left buttocks noted on 10/19/22. Under Recent Fall or injury- date and specifics the report documents, had recent fall in room landing on buttocks. The remainder of the report is blank except the resident interview is marked as NA and reviewed by DON (Director of Nurses) and Reviewed by Administrator has signatures. The areas of staff interviews, equipment observed, most likely cause, and investigation completed by, and date are all blank. At the end of the report the following is handwritten in, Due to recent falls IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) team and family (POA) send to (name of mental health hospital) for med review. R3's Investigation of Skin Tear, Bruises, and Abrasions dated 10/19/22 documents a bruise to left 2nd digit noted on 10/19/22. Under Recent Fall or injury -date and specifics the report documents, had recent fall hitting closet door and hits second doors. The areas of s[TRUNCATED]
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to notify the state agency of injury of unknown origins f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to notify the state agency of injury of unknown origins for 1 of 4 (R3) residents investigated for abuse in the sample of 20. Findings Include: 1.R3's admission Record with a print date of 10/20/22 documents R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's Disease, dementia, hypothyroidism, dysphagia, brief psychotic disorder, chronic kidney disease, mood disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. R3's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 9/8/22 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 01, which indicates R3 has a severe cognitive impairment. R3's same MDS documents R3 requires assist of two staff for bed mobility and transfers. Under balance during transitions and walking R3's MDS documents R3 is not steady, only able to stabilize with staff assistance. Under Functional Abilities R3's MDS documents to go from lying to sitting on side of bed R3 requires partial/moderate assistance. On 10/18/22 at 6:42 AM, R3 was observed walking the length of the dining room and out into the hallway. R3 was wearing pajamas and no shoes. R3 was unsteady and stumbling some during this observation. R3 had dried blood on his shirt on the top of his left shoulder, on his left ear, and on his neck behind his left ear. This surveyor notified V7 of the blood and she stated she thought the blood on his shirt was dried blood. This surveyor agreed with her that it was dried blood and pointed out the blood on R3's ear and neck. Immediately following this observation and throughout the day on 10/18/22, R3's medical record was reviewed and did not document incident reports, assessments, or follow up related to the dried blood on R3's left ear/neck. On 10/20/22 at 12:46 PM, when asked about the injury to R3's ear V2(DON/Director of Nurses) stated there was always an ongoing investigation for R3. When asked if I could see the investigation V2 stated she didn't have anything written on it that she could give me. After this interview V2 provided this surveyor with the following documentation. R3's Skin Tear report dated 10/18/22 4:45 PM, documents, Resident ambulating falling back to hit the closet door with his left arm causing multiple skin tears to upper-elbow-forearm of left arm, wounds cleansed with wound cleanser non adhere drsg (dressing) applied arm wrapped with cling wrap and secured with tape This report documents the state agency was not notified. On 10/19/22 at 3:45 PM, R3 was observed sitting on the side of a bed with no sheets on it, wearing torn pajama pants, a dressing was observed to R3's left hand, the hematoma to R3's left forehead, left cheek, and left eye area is black/red/blue. R3 doesn't speak to this surveyor. There is a recliner next to the bed with the footrest raised and blankets in the recliner. V31 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) was present with this surveyor and stated to R3 that he had gotten out of the recliner. V31 attempted to redirect R3 when he stood up from the bed. R3 was very unsteady on his feet. R3's soles of his feet were either bruised or dirty and there were scratches observed on the side of R3's left foot. R3's progress notes document on 10/11/22 at 10:00 PM, Weekly skin observation completed for R3. Skin is warm, dry, within normal limits. Skin turgor is good. Skin Concerns: Skin concerns observed: Back of head-scabbed area from recent fall. No s/s of infection. No swelling, Skin concerns observed are not new . This skin assessment does not document any other areas observed to R3's skin. R3's progress notes document on 10/19/22 at 4:01 PM, .Skin assessment completed today and V4 (Physician) notified for treatments for skin tears. Skin tear noted left wrist, old skin tear noted to left second digit and slight bruising starting around it. 3 skin tears noted near left elbow area, left upper forearm has a skin tear, old skin tear noted on right wrist, bruise noted on left shoulder area pinkish purple in color, right lower back has a small scab noted, abrasion noted behind left ear/neck, left lower ear lobe has a small open area like skin tear, bruising pinkish purple noted to center of upper chest, right buttocks and right post thigh has bruising and it is spreading to other side of buttocks and starting to go down scrotum and lower back, back of scalp has a small scabbed area left eye and cheek and forehead has dark purple pinkish red bruising and eye lids are swollen and left eye is reddened, right lower ext (extremity) has a small scab approx. (approximately) 1.5 cm ( centimeter), left lower ext has a small scab approx. 0.5 cm long, few small scattered bruises noted to bil (bilateral) hands, pinkish purple bruising noted to right temple area and right side forehead. On 10/26/22 at 9:41 AM, when asked if he investigated the injuries of unknown origins including the bruises noted on R3's skin assessment from 10/19/22, V1 (Administrator) stated they were just going by the several falls that he had and his (R3's) picking. V1 stated R3's behaviors have been escalating for the past month. When asked how he knew the injuries came from the falls/behaviors and didn't come from abuse, V1 stated, I interview, I look at the bruising, the type of bruising, and determine if it is consistent with the fall. When asked for that investigation documenting those findings, V1 stated he didn't have one in writing, but he could write it up for me. On 11/0/1/22 at 5:36 PM, V1 provided this surveyor with the following investigations. R3's Investigation of skin tear, bruises, abrasions dated 10/18/22 documents, left ear under location with no type or description of injury documented. Under Recent Fall or injury-date and specifics it documents, several recent falls et (and) behaviors. Handwritten at the bottom of the report it documents, We do weekly skin assessments, done 10/11/22, then 10/18/22. After wound was cleaned it was a small scratch. R3 has many behaviors including beating on walls et doors, tearing fixtures off of wall. Resident frequently taking clothes off, refuses to have nails trimmed, so resident does scratch self often. Scratch is consistent with resident behaviors. Blood spot was found on resident pillowcase consistent with scratch. The report documents the state agency was not notified of the injury. V1 (Administrator) verified via email on 11/07/22 at 11:49 AM the skin assessment referred to in this investigation is the same as the assessment dated [DATE]. V1 stated the assessment was started on 10/18/22 and completed on 10/19/22. R3's Investigation of Skin Tear, Bruises, and Abrasions dated 10/08/22 documents, a bruise to right posterior thigh. Under description of area, it documents right side. Under Resident Fall or injury- date and specifics the report documents, Resident had recent fall 10/8/22 in hallway landing on right side. The report documents the state agency was not notified. R3's Investigation of Skin Tear, Bruises, and Abrasions dated 10/19/22 documents, a bruise to left buttocks noted on 10/19/22. Under Recent Fall or injury- date and specifics the report documents, had recent fall in room landing on buttocks. The report documents the state agency was not notified. R3's Investigation of Skin Tear, Bruises, and Abrasions dated 10/19/22 documents, a bruise to left 2nd digit noted on 10/19/22. Under Recent Fall or injury -date and specifics the report documents, had recent fall hitting closet door and hits second doors. The report documents the state agency was not notified. On 11/07/22 at 11:49 AM V1 (Administrator) stated in email that he had not reported R3's injuries of unknown origin to the State Agency because none of them were reportable. The facility Abuse Prevention and Reporting- Illinois policy dated 11/28/16 documents under Internal Investigation: All incidents will be documented whether or not abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property occurred, was alleged or suspected. For resident injuries not involving an allegation of abuse or neglect, the administrator will appoint a person to gather further facts to make a determination as to whether the injury should be classified as injury of unknown source. An injury should be classified as an injury of unknown source: when both of the following conditions are met: The source of the injury was not observed by any person, or the source of the injury could not be explained by the resident; and The injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury or the location of the injury (e.g. the injury is located in an area not generally vulnerable to trauma) or the number of injuries observed at one particular point in time or the incidence of injuries over time. If the cause of an injury of unknown, the person gathering facts will document the injury, the location and time it was observed, any treatment given and whether the physician, responsible party and/or the Department of Public Health were notified. If the injury is classified as an injury of unknown source, the procedures and times frames for reporting and investigating abuse will be followed. All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury; or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures. Within five working days after the report of the occurrence, a complete written report of the conclusion of the investigation, including steps the facility has taken in response to the allegation will be sent to the Department of Public Health.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate injuries of unknown origins for...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate injuries of unknown origins for 1 of 4 (R3) residents investigated for abuse in the sample of 20. Findings Include: 1.R3's admission Record with a print date of 10/20/22 documents R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's Disease, dementia, hypothyroidism, dysphagia, brief psychotic disorder, chronic kidney disease, mood disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. R3's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 9/8/22 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 01, which indicates R3 has a severe cognitive impairment. R3's same MDS documents R3 requires assist of two staff for bed mobility and transfers. Under balance during transitions and walking R3's MDS documents R3 is not steady, only able to stabilize with staff assistance. Under Functional Abilities R3's MDS documents to go from lying to sitting on side of bed R3 requires partial/moderate assistance. R3's undated Care Plan documents a Focus area of I am at High risk for falls r/t (related to) dementia, reduce safety awareness and wandering behaviors. Goal: All falls will be reviewed by the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) through next review. Interventions documented on the care plan are as follows, 4/29/19- Be Sure R3's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. The resident needs prompt response to all requests for assistance. Educate the resident/family/caregivers about safety reminders and what to do if a fall occurs. Encourage R3 to participate in activities that promote exercise, physical activity for strengthening and improved mobility such as: walking to meals and activities. Review information on past falls and attempt to determine cause of falls. Record possible root causes. After remove any potential causes if possible. Educate resident/family/caregivers/IDT as to causes. 5/2/2019- Staff educated to make sure all personal items including water glass on the bed side table are in reach when in bed. 12/17/19-Sign (tractor) to be put on R3's door to assist him while finding is (sic) room. 12/27/19- R3 needs activities that minimize the potential for falls while providing diversion and distraction. 3/4/20-Remove all tripping hazards from room at this time. 4/13/20- Staff to ensure that R3 has all items in reach when eating. 7/13/20-Encourage R3 is (sic) wearing appropriate footwear non-skid socks or shoes when ambulating as he allows. 12/15/21- Ensure rolling desk chair is securely pushed up under desk. Place stationary chair behind nurse's station. 9/12/22-R3 room relocated closer to nurse's station to increase monitoring. 10/19/22- Night light added to R3's room to decrease falls. 10/10/22-Staff to offer assistance when R3 is ambulating as he will allow. On 10/18/22 at 6:42 AM, R3 was observed walking the length of the dining room and out into the hallway. R3 was wearing pajamas and no shoes. R3 was unsteady and stumbling some during this observation. R3 had dried blood on his shirt on the top of his left shoulder, on his left ear, and on his neck behind his left ear. There were no staff observed in the dining room or in the hallway. This surveyor noted V7 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) behind the nurse's station in a small room eating breakfast. This surveyor notified V7 of the blood and she stated she thought the blood on his shirt was dried blood. This surveyor agreed with her that it was dried blood and pointed out the blood on R3's ear and neck. V7 stated she didn't know if it was something new and walked with R3 to a room located down the hall, not near the nurse's station. She then went back to the small room behind the nurse's station and began eating. R3 was observed two more times throughout the day on 10/18/22, both times he was in bed. Immediately following this observation and throughout the day on 10/18/22, R3's medical record was reviewed and did not document incident reports, assessments, or follow up related to the dried blood on R3's left ear/neck. On 10/18/22 at 1:30 PM, V7 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) stated R3 had been really combative on 10/18/22. V7 stated they told the nurse about his ear, and she thinks maybe he scratched it. V7 stated they tried cleaning his ear, but he wouldn't let them. When asked if she was aware of any recent fall, V7 stated, there was nothing in report and nothing happened on day shift on 10/18/22. (The most recent fall documented in R3's record was on 10/08/22.) On 10/20/22 at 6:30 AM, V13 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated she didn't know what happened to R3's left ear. On 10/21/22 at 10:05 AM V18 (CNA), stated she had provided care to R3 but not when he had any falls. When asked if she knew what happened to R3's ear V18 stated she had no clue. On 10/20/22 at 11:51 AM V17 (LPN), stated she worked on Tuesday 10/18/22. When asked if she knew what happened to R3's ear V17 stated, just what she was told, that he had hit it on his bed or something the night before. (There is no documentation in R3's medical record of him hitting his head on the bed on 10/17/22). On 10/20/22 at 12:46 PM, when asked about the injury to R3's ear V2(DON/Director of Nurses) stated there was always an ongoing investigation for R3. When asked if I could see the investigation V2 stated she didn't have anything written on it that she could give me. After this interview V2 provided this surveyor with the following documentation. R3's Skin Tear report dated 10/18/22 4:45 PM documents, Resident ambulating falling back to hit the closet door with his left arm causing multiple skin tears to upper-elbow-forearm of left arm, wounds cleansed with wound cleanser non adhere drsg (dressing) applied arm wrapped with cling wrap and secured with tape R3's Progress note dated 10/18/22 at 5:22 PM, Resident has been very restless, hitting the doors and walls with his hands, difficulty with sitting still, resident was in his old room and fell back against the closet doors and caused skin tears to back side of upper middle and lower left arm, combative with staff when trying to provide care, hitting, kicking, pinching, and biting at staff. Notified V4 (Physician) with new order received to give PM dose of Valium now and hold tonight dose. Notified ADON (Assistant Director of Nurses) and POA (power of attorney) of health care with a return call from (family member) with update on condition. Staff assist to DR (dining room) for supper meal resident unable to sit long enough to eat, carried around bowl of peas to eat. The skin tear report dated 10/18/22 at 4:45 PM and the progress note dated 10/18/22 at 5:22 PM indicate R3 did not have documentation in his medical record related to a fall prior to the observation on 10/18/22 at 6:42 AM that would account for the dried blood on his ear/neck. Upon requesting the investigation for the areas on R3's neck/ear this surveyor was provided with the following progress note. R3's 10/20/22 8:48 AM progress note documents, Resident had fall, struck side of bed on LT (left) side of head, scratches to LT side of ear which is consistent with striking head on bed on LT side, Injury with dried blood was noticed within one day, healing was already taking place which is consistent with time of fall. This report has handwritten on it, From 10/18/22 fall This information is consistent with the information provided by V17 (LPN) in her interview on 10/19/22 at 11:51 AM. There is no other documentation in R3's medical record related to follow up, neurological checks, or new interventions related to a fall where R3 hit his head on his bed. R3's Injury of Known report with the date cut off and not readable documents Resident had a fall where he struck the left side of his head, scratch is on left side of head. This report was given to this surveyor with R3's progress notes dated 10/20/22 8:48 AM, attached to it. When asked for a copy of this report with the date viewable received the following risk management report from V2. R3's Risk Management report dated 10/20/22 8:48 AM documents, Resident had a scratch to left ear. Under Description of Action Taken the report documents, Resident had a fall where he struck the left side of his head, scratch is on left side of head. On 11/02/22 at 4:32 PM, this surveyor asked V1 (Administrator) and V2 (DON) to please clarify the discrepancies in the progress notes, skin tear report, and risk management report. They stated they would see what they could find. As of 11/03/22 they have not provided this surveyor with any other information. On 11/0/4/22 at 9:49 AM this surveyor spoke with V1 and V2 and explained that I needed clarification related to the different reports on R3's fall related to the area on his ear. V2 stated she had sent me the report with handwritten information at the bottom of the report. V2 stated she would see what else they had and send it to me. On 11/04/22 at 11:46 AM, this surveyor received an email with an Investigation of Skin Tear, Bruises, and Abrasions attached dated 10/18/22. The report documents the location as left ear with no description of injury documented. The report documents R3 had several recent falls et (and) behaviors. Handwritten at the bottom of the report it documents, We do weekly skin assessments, done 10/11/22, then 10/18/22. After wound was cleaned, it was a small scratch. R3 has many behaviors, including beating on walls and doors, tearing fixtures off of wall. R3's frequently taking clothes off, refuses to have nails trimmed, so resident does scratch self often. Scratch is consistent with resident behavior. Blood spot was found on resident pillowcase, consistent with scratch. V1 (Administrator) verified via email on 11/07/22 at 11:49 AM the skin assessment referred to in this investigation is the same as the assessment dated [DATE]. V1 stated the assessment was started on 10/18/22 and completed on 10/19/22. On 11/4/22 at 12:50 PM spoke with V1 and V2 related to the information provided in the email dated 11/4/22 at 11:46 AM. V2 stated R3 did not have any behaviors or falls on 10/17/22. V2 stated the skin tear report dated 10/18/22 at 4:45 PM and the progress note dated 10/18/22 at 5:52 PM are referencing the same incident that occurred at 4:45 PM. V2 stated she thinks the progress note dated 10/20/22 at 8:48 AM was when she was talking with nurses and trying to determine where the dried blood on R3's ear and neck had come from. V2 stated she assumed it came from the other fall. When asked what other fall she was referencing she stated the nurses had told her R3 had fallen by his bed. V2 then stated R3 didn't actually fall and hit his head on his bed, but she believes he scratched his ear while in bed. On 10/19/22 at 3:45 PM, R3 was observed sitting on the side of a bed with no sheets on it, wearing torn pajama pants, a dressing was observed to R3's left hand, the hematoma to R3's left forehead, left cheek, and left eye area is black/red/blue. R3 doesn't speak to this surveyor. There is a recliner next to the bed with the footrest raised and blankets in the recliner. V31 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) was present with this surveyor and stated to R3 that he had gotten out of the recliner. V31 attempted to redirect R3 when he stood up from the bed. R3 was very unsteady on his feet. R3's soles of his feet were either bruised or dirty and there were scratches observed on the side of R3's left foot. R3's progress notes document on 10/11/22 at 10:00 PM, Weekly skin observation completed for R3. Skin is warm, dry, within normal limits. Skin turgor is good. Skin Concerns: Skin concerns observed: Back of head-scabbed area from recent fall. No s/s of infection. No swelling, Skin concerns observed are not new . This skin assessment does not document any other areas observed to R3's skin. R3's progress notes document on 10/19/22 at 4:01 PM, Skin assessment completed today and V4 (Physician) notified for treatments for skin tears. Skin tear noted left wrist, old skin tear noted to left second digit and slight bruising starting around it. 3 skin tears noted near left elbow area, left upper forearm has a skin tear, old skin tear noted on right wrist, bruise noted on left shoulder area pinkish purple in color, right lower back has a small scab noted, abrasion noted behind left ear/neck, left lower ear lobe has a small open area like skin tear, bruising pinkish purple noted to center of upper chest, right buttocks and right post thigh has bruising and it is spreading to other side of buttocks and starting to go down scrotum and lower back, back of scalp has a small scabbed area left eye and cheek and forehead has dark purple pinkish red bruising and eye lids are swollen and left eye is reddened, right lower ext (extremity) has a small scab approx. (approximately) 1.5 cm ( centimeter), left lower ext has a small scab approx. 0.5 cm long, few small scattered bruises noted to bil (bilateral) hands, pinkish purple bruising noted to right temple area and right side forehead. On 10/26/22 at 9:41 AM, when asked if he investigated the injuries of unknown origins including the bruises noted on R3's skin assessment from 10/19/22, V1 (Administrator) stated they were just going by the several falls that R3 had and R3's picking. V1 stated R3's behaviors have been escalating for the past month. When asked how he knew the injuries came from the falls/behaviors and didn't come from abuse, V1 stated, I interview, I look at the bruising, the type of bruising, and determine if it is consistent with the fall. When asked for that investigation documenting those findings, V1 stated he didn't have one in writing, but he could write it up for me. On 11/0/1/22 at 5:36 PM, V1 provided this surveyor with the following investigations. R3's Investigation of skin tear, bruises, abrasions dated 10/18/22 documents left ear under location with no type or description of injury documented. The areas of First noted by whom, Date, Time, Date/Shift of last shower, and transfer status, Equipment, any new assistive devices or equipment, any signs/symptoms of infection, Resident interview, Most likely cause, Staff interviews conducted, New intervention, Care plan updated, Investigation Completed by, Date, and Reviewed by Administrator are all blank. Under Recent Fall or injury-date and specifics it documents, several recent falls et (and) behaviors. Handwritten at the bottom of the report it documents, We do weekly skin assessments, done 10/11/22, then 10/18/22. After wound was cleaned it was a small scratch. R3 has many behaviors including beating on walls et doors, tearing fixtures off of wall. Resident frequently taking clothes off, refuses to have nails trimmed, so resident does scratch self often. Scratch is consistent with resident behaviors. Blood spot was found on resident pillowcase consistent with scratch. R3's Investigation of Skin Tear, Bruises, and Abrasions dated 10/08/22 documents a bruise to right posterior thigh. Under description of area, it documents right side. Under Resident Fall or injury- date and specifics the report documents, Resident had recent fall 10/8/22 in hallway landing on right side. The following areas are blank on the report, Recent IV therapy, Recent LOA (leave of absence) with family, Equipment, any new assistive devices or equipment, any signs/symptoms of infection, Resident interview, most likely cause, staff interview conducted, new interventions implemented, and care plan updated. With no person documented under Investigation completed by and no date of completion documented. R3's Investigation of Skin Tear, Bruises, and Abrasions dated 10/19/22 documents a bruise to left buttocks noted on 10/19/22. Under Recent Fall or injury- date and specifics the report documents, had recent fall in room landing on buttocks. The remainder of the report is blank except the resident interview is marked as NA and reviewed by DON (Director of Nurses) and Reviewed by Administrator has signatures. The areas of staff interviews, equipment observed, most likely cause, and investigation completed by, and date are all blank. At the end of the report the following is handwritten in, Do (sic) to recent falls IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) team and family (POA) send to (name of mental health hospital) for med review. R3's Investigation of Skin Tear, Bruises, and Abrasions dated 10/19/22 documents a bruise to left 2nd digit noted on 10/19/22. Under Recent Fall or injury -date and specifics the report documents, had recent fall hitting closet door and hits second doors. The areas of staff interview, observing equipment, investigation completed by, and date are all blank. This indicates the investigations into the bruises of unknown origin identified on 10/19/22 were not complete or thorough. The bruise to R3's chest and the area behind R3's left ear is not addressed in these investigations. The investigations were also dated prior to V1's interview that documented he did not have written investigations of the areas identified on R3's 10/19/22 skin assessment. The facility Abuse Prevention and Reporting - Illinois policy dated 11/28/16 documents under Internal Investigation- All incidents will be documented, whether or not abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property occurred, was alleged or suspected. Any incident or allegation involving abuse, neglect, exploitation mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property will result in an investigation. For resident injuries not involving an allegation of abuse or neglect, the administrator will appoint a person to gather further facts to make a determination as to whether the injury should be classified as an injury of unknown source. An injury should be classified as an injury of unknown source when both of the following conditions are met: The source of the injury was not observed by any person or the source of the injury could not be explained by the resident; and The injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury or the location of the injury (e.g., the injury is located in an area not generally vulnerable to trauma) or the number of injuries observed at one particular point in time or the incidence of injuries over time. If the cause of an injury is unknown, the person gathering facts will document the injury, the location and time it was observed, any treatment given and whether the physician responsible party and/or the Department of Public Health were notified. If the injury is classified as an injury of unknown source, the procedures and time frames for reporting and investigating will be followed. Under Investigation Procedures the policy documents, The appointed investigator, will at a minimum, attempt to interview the person who reported the incident, anyone likely to have direct knowledge of the incident and the resident, if interviewable. Any written statements that have been submitted will be reviewed, along with any pertinent medical records or other documents Final Investigation Report: The investigator will report the conclusions of the investigation in writing to the administrator or designee within five working days of the reported incident. The final investigation report shall contain the following .Facts determined during the process of the investigation, review of medical record and interview of witnesses, Conclusion of the investigation based on known facts.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0744 (Tag F0744)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with diagnosis of Alzheimer's/dement...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with diagnosis of Alzheimer's/dementia received the necessary person-centered care and services consistent with the resident's goals and symptomology for 1 of 3 (R3) residents reviewed for dementia care in the sample of 20. Findings Include: R3's admission Record with a print date of 10/20/22 documents R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, Brief Psychotic Disorder, Mood Disorder, and Schizoaffective Disorder. R3's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 9/8/22 documents R3 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 01, which indicates R3 has a severe cognitive impairment. R3's progress notes document, 9/9/22 6:25 PM Resident had a witnessed fall 09/09/2022 6:25 PM Location of fall: Residents room, Res (resident) found on floor in room and noted to have a small laceration to back of head, approx. (approximately) 3 cm . Resident assisted up and onto bed. Refuses to stay in bed, gait is unsteady and leaning backwards. Actions Taken: Assisted into bed but refuses to stay. Interventions: Mattress put on floor. R3's undated Care Plan documents the Focus area, I have little, or no activity involvement Date initiated: 5/16/2019 with two interventions with initiation dates of 7/17/2019 documented as, The resident needs a variety of activity types and locations to maintain interests. The resident (R3) needs assistance/escort to activity functions. This care plan had no resident person centered interventions documented in this focus area. R3's undated Care Plan documents the Focus areas of 1. I have a behavior problem; I think any bed is mine when I am tired and want to sleep and sometime, I sit in the floor r/t (related to) the severity of my dementia. Date Initiated: 04/25/2019, Revision on: 8/11/2022. This focus area documents the following interventions dated 5/13/2019, Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Anticipate and meet (R3's) needs. Motion alarm on door to alert staff when R3 leaves the room. R3 moved closer to nurse's station for better observation. This focus area also includes the intervention of R3 sits down on the floor at times when tired dated 8/11/2022. 2. I am/had potential to be verbally aggressive (specify) r/t (nothing documented after related to) Date Initiated: 10/28/2022, with interventions dated 10/28/22 of Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. 3. I have a mood problem r/t my confusion. Date Initiated: 10/28/2022, Revision on: 10/28/2022 with interventions dated 7/17/2019 documented as, Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Monitor/record/report to MD PRN mood patterns s/sx (signs/symptoms) of depression, anxiety, sad mood as per facility behavior monitoring protocols. 4. R3 has an alteration in neurological status r/t Alzheimer's Dementia. Date Initiated: 10/28/2022, Revision on: 10/28/22 with interventions dated 5/13/2019 documented as Assess for effects of psychotropic meds. Cueing, reorientation as needed. Give medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. On 10/20/22 at 9:52 AM, V15 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, she was working one night (date unknown) when R3 fell and hit his head. V15 stated, R3 was difficult to redirect and wouldn't stay in bed after the fall. V15 stated, she gave R3 snacks, walked with him, and let him hug her (because he liked to give hugs). V15 stated, the staff would redirect R3, sometimes he would sit down and sometimes he wouldn't. V15 stated, she placed R3's mattress on the floor on the night of the fall. When asked how placing R3's mattress on the floor helped? V15 stated, Well, he (R3) wasn't able to get up. V15 stated, the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) working with her on the unit left the facility sick around 2:00 AM, and after that she (V15) was the only staff working on that unit. V15 stated, she wasn't able to properly supervise R3, so she placed the mattress on the floor as a safety intervention. V15 stated she attempted to call staff in, but no one was available. On 10/20/22 at 12:46 PM, this surveyor informed V2 (DON/Director of Nurses) of V15's interview of putting R3's mattress on the floor and V15 saying R3 couldn't get up. V2 stated, she wasn't aware of them only having one nurse on the unit and no CNA's. V2 stated, she would expect facility staff to call her if that happened. V2 stated, she would consider putting R3's mattress on the floor a restraint and R3 isn't assessed for needing restraints. On 10/26/22 at 9:41 AM, V1 (Administrator) was asked about R3's mattress being put on the floor as an intervention. V1 stated (V15) ensured the safety of the resident, and he was good with the mattress being on the floor, if it was being used as a safety measure. V1 stated he thought increased monitoring would have ensured R3's safety, so his mattress wouldn't have to be put on the floor. V1 stated, he was not aware the CNA had to go home leaving only one staff member on the unit. V1 stated, there were three CNA's working on the other halls and they would have floated over to that unit to help. On 11/01/22 at 4:20 PM, V15 (LPN) stated, on 9/9/22 after she had moved R3's mattress to the floor R3 was able to get off the mattress and did in fact get off it while she was working that night. V15 stated, R3 crawled on his hands and knees to the door of his room and asked for help. V15 stated, she had to go to the other side to get another nurse to assist her in getting R3 off the floor. V15 stated she did not believe it would have been safe for her to assist R3 off the floor by herself. V15 stated, she put R3 back in his bed and she believed he stayed there the remainder of the night. When asked if that was the only time another staff member came to the unit to assist her, V15 stated, the other nurse came over to the unit around 5:30 AM so she could go to the other side to pass medications. When asked if she notified V1 or V2 that she was the only staff working on the unit, V15 stated no, she did not call V1 or V2. V15 stated the other nurse made the calls to the staff to come in, and she wasn't sure if she had attempted to call V1 or V2. On 10/18/22 at 6:42 AM, R3 was observed walking the length of the dining room and out into the hallway. R3 was wearing pajamas and no shoes. R3 was unsteady and stumbling some during this observation. R3 had dried blood on his shirt on the top of his left shoulder, on his left ear, and on his neck behind his left ear. There were no staff observed in the dining room or in the hallway. This surveyor noted V7 (CNA) behind the nurse's station in a small room eating breakfast. This surveyor notified V7 of the blood and she stated she thought the blood on his shirt was dried blood. This surveyor agreed with her that it was dried blood and pointed out the blood on R3's ear and neck. V7 stated, she didn't know if it was something new and walked with R3 to a room located down the hall, not near the nurse's station. She then went back to the small room behind the nurse's station and began eating. R3 was observed two more times throughout the day on 10/18/22, both times he was in bed. On 10/20/22 at 6:30 AM, when asked what interventions the facility staff use to prevent R3 from becoming aggressive, V13 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, they rub R3's back, give him oatmeal cream pies and milk, and keep him away from other residents. V13 stated, lately R3 has not been redirectable. V13 stated, she thinks that has happened since R3 was started on the Valium. When asked if they had enough staff to provide supervision for R3, V13 stated, Sometimes. On 10/21/22 at 12:02 PM, V20 (RN/Registered Nurse) stated she provides care to R3. V20 stated, they use interventions such as food and walking with him. V20 stated, they give R3 sandwiches and R3 is usually content if has something to eat. V20 stated, R3 definitely has aggression, but if they catch R3 when he is in a good enough mood then they can provide care. On 10/20/22 at 11:51 AM, V17 (LPN) stated, R3's disease and behaviors were progressing. V17 stated they offer R3 different things. V17 stated, R3 really likes cookies. V17 stated they also try toileting R3 but sometimes he won't sit still long enough to toilet. V17 stated, she wasn't sure if not being able to sit still was part of the disease process. V17 stated, R3 was on Haldol and became more aggressive. V17 stated, she didn't think R3 had been on the Valium long enough to know if it was going to work. V17 stated R3's primary physician saw him on 10/13/22 and he had routine lab work. V17 stated she didn't think they had enough staff to provide care and or supervision for R3. V17 stated, R3 would have to be 1:1 to prevent falls and/or behaviors. V17 stated, if you took R3 out of the scenario they would have enough staff. When asked if she had any concerns about the care R3 was receiving V17 stated, Not really. V17 stated they were just trying to get the best care for him. On 11/04/22 at 1:13 PM, V26 (MDS/Care Plan Coordinator) stated, they include resident's families in the care plan meetings quarterly. V26 stated, he was responsible for completing the care plans. When asked why R3 didn't have a care plan with specific and/or personalized interventions for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's/dementia, V26 stated, that is usually taken care of by the Activities Director (V36). V26 stated that also helps when they go to activities. This surveyor reviewed R3's care plan with V26 and asked why likes/dislikes and preferences weren't part of R3's care plan. V26 stated, he knew R3 liked tractors and that is why he has an intervention to place a picture of a tractor on his room door so he can locate his room. V26 stated, other than that he doesn't take care of that part, speaking of specific interventions related to the diagnosis of Alzheimer's/dementia. On 10/19/22 at 11:14 AM, V30 (Family Member) stated, she was notified about a month ago R3 was on Valium and R3 was started on several other medications that were not working and R3 is now falling. V30 stated, she was at the facility to discuss R3 being transferred to a regional mental health hospital. On 11/03/22 at 2:01 PM, when asked if she or the facility initiated the transfer to the regional mental health hospital on [DATE], V30 (Family Member) stated, the facility started the process, and then she saw the condition R3 was in when she visited on 10/19/22 and told them she wanted R3 sent out. V30 stated, R3 had fallen three times in 24 hours, R3's whole face was black and blue, and R3 was grabbing at things that weren't there. V30 stated, R3 had been incontinent, and the facility staff were going to wait till he calmed down to clean him. V30 stated, R3's toenails were bleeding from him kicking the doors and R3 just wanted a blanket. V30 stated, R3 would kick the doors attempting to get outside and sit in the sun because he was cold. V30 stated, she asked staff to cover the doors so he couldn't see outside, but they didn't. V30 stated, she attempted to keep the facility informed but felt like I was talking to walls. When asked if facility staff had ever asked her about R3's interests, V30 stated, they did ask when R3 first moved to the facility. V30 stated, she had talked with her husband about writing a list of R3's likes/dislikes such as when he gets up from a nap, he wants a snack. V30 stated, R3 just can't communicate that anymore. When asked if she witnessed staff attempting different interventions for R3, V30 stated, when she was at the facility staff were off doing other things. On 11/04/22 at 1:20 PM, V36 (Activities Director) stated, she was the one responsible for R3's care plan specific to activity likes/dislikes. V36 stated she calls the families and gets input when the resident can't communicate with her. V36 stated, R3 was very active throughout his life and tends to go back and forth to the doors, so the only thing staff can do is walk with him. V36 stated R3's family had never reported to her that R3 would like to sit outside in the sunshine. V36 stated R3 wasn't outside recently due to R3 being in bed so much. V36 stated if R3 was in bed, the facility staff let him sleep. When asked when she spoke with R3's family last, V36 stated she didn't know for sure, but it had been quite a while. V36 stated the last time they went over a C&P (Current & Past Recreation - Activity Initial/Annual Comprehensive) was in 2020. When asked if that was the last assessment completed for R3, V36 stated she does a preference assessment every quarter. V36 stated she contacts the family when she does the preference assessments. This surveyor reviewed R3's care plan with V36 and asked where it documented the specific interventions. V36 determined this surveyor was not able to see all of the interventions she had listed on R3's care plan. V36 sent this surveyor the care plan V36 had for R3. The undated care plan V36 sent this surveyor documents a Focus area of I have little, or no activity involvement Date Initiated: 5/16/2019, Revision on: 07/17/2019 with interventions as follows, 4/24/2019- current events/news, music, provide activities calendar monthly, worship, bingo, 4/26/2019- teatime/coffee break, 5/16/19- family/friends visits, stop bys- for those residents that refuse one on one visits but will accept occasional stop bys, television, 7/17/2019- The resident needs a variety of activity types and locations to maintain interests. The resident needs assistance/escort to activity functions. 5/24/2020- sensory, 10/19/2020- manicure, 12/21/21- party, dining, 3/23/22- snacks, 7/15/22- trivia. This care plan shows interventions of activities such as bingo and trivia which are not person centered for R3, who has severe cognitive impairment. This care plan has no description of what sensory means. There is no mention of sitting outside as preferred activity or intervention for R3, no documentation of what R3's preferred snacks are (such as oatmeal crème pies, cookies, or sandwiches) or when these things should be offered or attempted. There is also nothing documented in the care plan regarding some of the things staff mentioned that sometimes work for R3, such as approaching him for care during times when he is in a good mood, or increasing monitoring and supervision during times when R3 is restless, unable to sit still or engaging in behavioral incidents. R3's Activity Initial/Annual Comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documents the information was obtained from family as well as R3. The assessment documents R3 communicates with verbal speech, his vision is highly impaired, hearing is adequate, R3 is easily distracted, needs direct supervision for decision making, did not serve in the military, and was a machine operator. R3 is documented as having no interest in crafts or computer video. The assessment documents R3 was interested in spiritual programs, community outings, pet interaction, gardening, cooking, TV/movies, reading books, card games and exercise in the past, and R3 is currently interested in current events and social parties. The assessment documents R3 has no interest in music. R3's Activity Initial/ Annual Comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documents the information was obtained from the family and changes from the 4/28/21 assessment include a moderate difficulty in hearing and R3's past occupation is listed as farmer instead of machine operator. The report documents under Summary, Little to no interest in activities. Listens to music, music and memory during meals, visits (stop by during activity times), exercises in walking up and down the hall with staff members, watches television for a little bit throughout the day and at times at meals. Under Current and Past Recreation, R3's assessment documents the same interests as the assessment dated [DATE] except exercise is marked as current and music is marked as current and past. Under Comments the assessment documents, Called R3's son and the daughter in law answered the phone. I went ahead and updated the C&P based off of what we talked about with R3. The only thing that was believed to be changed was that exercise is current as well as past and the current events are no longer current. R3's Activities-Preferences Interviews documents dated 10/21/22 documents the family or significant other was the primary respondent for this interview and documents R3's daily habits preferences such as showers, sweatpants and tee shirts, bedtime and waking time, and that is it important to have snacks between meals. The interview documents it is not important at all for R3 to have books, newspapers, magazines, music, keep up with the news, to go outside, or to participate in religious services. It documents it is somewhat important for R3 to be around animals and very important for R3 to do his favorite activities. The interview does not document what R3's favorite activities are or what foods he likes for snacks. This assessment documents it is not important at all for R3 to go outside when R3's family reported it is important for R3 to go outside. R3's Order Summary Report with a print date of 11/4/22 with an Order Date Range: 07/01/2022 to 11/04/2022 documents the following current orders for R3, start date 10/28/22-Ativan 2 milligrams (mg)/ml (milliliters) inject 0.5 mg intramuscularly (IM) every 6 hours as needed for anxiety, Ativan 1 mg every four hours as needed, melatonin 3 mg at bedtime, Valium give 0.5 mg tablet by mouth at bedtime for anxiety, agitation related to dementia, and Risperdal 1 mg twice daily. R3 also has orders for Lexapro 10 mg in the morning for anxiety/depression with two separate start dates of 7/14/22 and 10/29/22. R3's same Order Summary Report documents the following orders with no discontinue date but that has discontinued documented next to the order: 7/7/22- Haldol 50 mg/ml inject 1 mg/ml IM every 12 hours as needed for increased agitation, Haldol 1 mg one tablet twice daily, 7/15/22- Seroquel 25 mg in the evening, 9/15/22- Seroquel 25 mg three times daily for psychosis, valium 5 mg at bedtime, 10/13/22- Valium 5 mg give 2.5 mg by mouth at bedtime, and 10/28/22-Risperdal 0.25 mg at bedtime and Risperdal 0.25 mg twice daily. The same Order Summary Report for R3 documents the following discontinued orders, Haldol 5 mg/ml inject 2 mg IM one time only start date 8/8/22, d/c date 8/9/22. Haldol 5 mg daily start and d/c date of 9/11/22. Seroquel 25 mg as needed for aggression/psychosis twice daily as needed start and end date of 7/27/22. Valium 5 mg give 2.5 mg one time only start and end date of 10/18/22. R3's Progress Notes document on 5/20/22, geripsych note: follow up Psych Evaluation: 86 y/o (year old) male admitted to (name of facility) on 4/24/19 from (name of regional mental health hospital) behavioral center for LTC (long term care). He (R3) has a dx (diagnosis) of advanced AD (Alzheimer's Disease) with behaviors including psychosis. Resident (R3) has been quite stable on Haldol 1 mg bid (twice daily- gdr (gradual dose reduction) done and nursing reports worsening aggression during personal care. He was seen for an follow up visit two weeks ago and Haldol was increased back to 1 mg bid for his aggression. He is seen today via tele-health, restart Haldol 1 mg bid (twice daily), fall precautions in place for poor safety awareness, discussed with staff to continue w/ (with) non-pharmacological interventions as much as possible including good sleep, hygiene, managing pain, reducing clutter and noise, giving ample cues. R3's Progress Notes document on 7/13/22 at 2:45 PM, geripsych note CC: reason for visit-tele-visit follow up Psych Evaluation continued psychosis and aggressive behaviors. 86 y/o male admitted to (initials of facility) on 4/24/19 from (name of regional mental health hospital) behavioral center for LTC (long term care). He has a dx (diagnosis of advanced AD (Alzheimer's Disease) with behaviors including psychosis and some aggression hitting. He was sent back to the facility on Haldol 1 mg bid (twice daily) - gdr was attempted however he became more aggressive, and dose increased back to 1 mg bid. Recently he was seen by the medical director at the facility and taken off the Haldol entirely with thought that it was causing more issues. He has had some aggression towards staff- grabbing and digging nails into nurse's arm along with putting his fist up in a threatening way. The resident was seen today via telehealth accompanied by the restorative RN (registered nurse) and social services. They report that the resident is no different off the medication as compared to when he is taking the Haldol. He will sometimes listen to redirection. Resident was restarted back on the Haldol, and he continues to display aggressive behaviors to the point that nurses are quitting on night shift When staff attempt to redirect, he (R3) becomes aggressive, and it is very difficult to care for him. After discussion with the DON (Director of Nurses) and SS (Social Services) psychiatry feels it is best he go out for an inpatient evaluation for better medication management. It is difficult to manage him on telehealth and he needs more 1:1 observation. R3's behavior tracking documents titled Documentation Survey Report V2 documents R3 had behaviors of yelling, screaming, kicking, hitting, pushing, grabbing, pinching, scratching, spitting, biting, rejection of care, and abusive language 19 times in 6/2022, 27 times in 7/2022, 18 times in 8/2022, 28 times in 9/2022, and 33 times in 10/2022. The interventions documented for these behaviors were snacks, toileting, taking for a walk, reassurance, and moving to a quiet environment. R2's behavior tracking reports the interventions were ineffective 8 of 19 times in 6/22, 20 of 27 times in 7/2022, 13 of 18 times in 8/2022, 21 of 28 times in 9/2022, and 27 of 33 times in 10/2022. R3's behavior tracking documents only one intervention was attempted with each behavior and does not document interventions were reviewed or revised. R3's behavior tracking documents did not show any tracking of behaviors related to psychosis. R3's regional mental health hospital record admission date 10/21/22 documents, Patient (R3) is an [AGE] year-old male who presented for increased aggression. Patient has been very restless and was reported to be hitting doors and walls. Patient has been combative with staff at their nursing home when they tried to provide care and the patient began assaulting staff. Patient was reported to be yelling and screaming, as well as biting, hitting, kicking, and punching staff. Psychiatric Health Diagnoses: Dementia, Alzheimer's, Schizoaffective Disorder, Psychotic Disorder, Mood Disorder. Stressors/Triggers: Unknown. R3 was admitted to the (name of hospital) on 10/21/22 for increased aggression. While here, he was made a 1:1 with a staff member at all times due to his poor safety awareness and high risk for falls. On 10/22, his Seroquel was discontinued due to no longer being effective and he started on a trial of Risperdal 0.25 mg twice daily for aggression. He was also started on an iron supplement on 10/25. He has not been tolerating oral medications or nutrition while here. It is the recommendations of the medical physician that R3 be discharged to a skilled nursing facility on comfort measures. On 10/21/22 at 11:30 AM, V4 (Physician) stated, he was aware of all of the falls R3 had and stated the problem with him is he is on the wrong medication (referring to Valium). V4 stated, he was not able to do anything about it since he was not the prescribing physician. On 11/01/22 at 4:32 PM, V2 stated, V4 (Physician) had prescribed R3's Valium. V2 stated, they sent R3 to a mental health hospital for evaluation of his medications because they considered that may have been the reason for the increase in falls R3 was having. V2 stated, R3 returned late on Friday evening (10/28/22). V2 stated, they had adjusted R3's medications and he hasn't had any falls since his return to the facility. R3's Order Audit Report with a print date of 11/10/2022 documents the order for Valium 5 mg with a start date of 9/15/22 was electronically signed by V4 (Physician) as the prescribing physician. On 11/04/2 at 12:50 PM, when asked why R3 wasn't sent to the regional mental health hospital for inpatient evaluation after the referral was made on 7/13/22 by the tele-health psychiatrist, V1 (Administrator) stated, they sent R3's information to the hospital and they require 3 days of documentation, and they don't accept aggression as an indicator for admission. V1 stated, the hospital declined to admit R3 for a hospital stay in 7/2022. The facility Comprehensive Care Plan policy dated 11/28/12 documents, Purpose: To develop a comprehensive care plan that directs the care team and incorporates the resident's goals, preferences, and services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Guidelines: The facility will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. A comprehensive care plan must be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments. The care plan should be revised on an ongoing basis to reflect changes in the resident and the care that the resident is receiving. The resident and/or resident representative shall be invited to review the plan of care with the interdisciplinary team either in person, via telephone or video conference (if available) at least quarterly.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to transcribe physician orders, and acquire and administer insulin in a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to transcribe physician orders, and acquire and administer insulin in accordance with the prescriber's order for 2 of 5 (R5 and R1) residents reviewed for administration of insulin. Findings Include: 1. R5's facility admission Record with a print date of 10/20/22 documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 10/14/22 with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes without complications. R5's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/8/22 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R5 is cognitively intact. R5's regional hospital after visit summary with hospital stay dates of 10/04/22 to 10/7/22 includes the following medications on the medication list, Tresiba inject 52 units into the skin daily and NovoLog 100 unit/ml inject into skin 3 times daily. R5's regional hospital records document under Scheduled meds sorted by name an order for Humalog three times daily before meals if blood glucose is 150-169 give 1 unit, 170-189 give 2 units, 190-209 give 3 units, 210- 229 give 4 units, 230-249 give 5 units, 250-269 give 6 units, 270-299 give 7 units, and if BS (blood glucose) greater than or equal to 300, give 8 units and recheck BS at next ordered time. If BS remains consecutively greater than 300 at next scheduled recheck call MD (physician). (There is a noted discrepancy in R5's hospital discharge orders that lists both Novolog and Humalog as the fast acting insulin to be administered via sliding scale. Since these orders were never implemented at the facility, it was never clarified which fast acting insulin was correct). R5's Progress Notes document on 10/08/22, R5 was transferred from the local dialysis center to the local emergency room for evaluation of chest pain. R5's progress notes document R5 was admitted to a regional hospital. R5's progress notes document R5 was discharged from the regional hospital back to the facility on [DATE]. R5's regional hospital records, under Patient Care Orders, include physician orders on 10/10/22 for Tresiba 52 units inject into skin daily and Humalog three times daily before meals with the following schedule documented, 150-189 - 1 unit, 190-299 - 2 units, 230-269- 3 units, 270-299 - 4 units, if blood glucose is greater than or equal to 300, give 5 units and recheck BS at next ordered time. If BS remains consecutively greater than 300 at next scheduled recheck, call MD. R5's Order Summary Report dated Active orders as of 10/13/2022 do not document physician orders for insulin or blood glucose monitoring from 10/07/22 until 10/13/22. R5's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 10/01/22 to 10/31/22 does not document an order to administer sliding scale insulin, Tresiba insulin, or to monitor blood glucose levels from 10/07/22 to 10/13/22. R5's facility progress notes document on 10/12/22 7:30 AM, Resident (R5) had an un-witnessed fall 10/12/22 6:30 AM. Location of Fall: Resident Room, Resident attempted to arise from recliner to take self to bed. Resident slid from recliner to the floor. Resident stated no injuries were obtained. On 10/12/2022 6:30 AM Assessment: Witnessed Fall- Did not strike head; Neurological checks not indicated. Alert and oriented to time, person, place, and situation. No changes in range of motion from normal baseline. No injuries observed. Actions Taken: Multiple staff assisted resident from floor to recliner. Full body assessment completed with no findings of any new areas. Daughter insisted that resident be seen in the ER (emergency room). Resident was seen in ER with a full work up completed, IVF (Intravenous fluids) administered, labs drawn, and CT (computerized tomography) of head completed. Resident returned to the facility with daughter escorting him. Report given by ER nursing staff and no areas of concern noted. No findings all test negative. No new orders given at time to discharge from emergency room. Vitals: Hypotension: medications reviewed, and areas of concern noted R/T (related to) consistent with low blood pressure. V4 (Physician) notified and full admission assessment completed. V4 (Physician) will continue to monitor. R5's local hospital records dated 10/12/22 documents under Assessment, Patient (R5) brought to ER (emergency room) from (name of facility) by family member who reports patient fell at nursing home this morning. Patient was in floor for approx (approximately) 4 hrs (hours) and is unsure if he slid off the bed or had stood up and fell. Patient is slightly confused and family states that patient has been declining cognitively since Sunday. Family reports she requested nursing home have a CT of the head done but the order had never been obtained. Under additional history R5's hospital record documents, AMS (altered mental status) x (times) 2 days. Recent Subarachnoid bleed from MVC (motor vehicle crash) 10/3/2022, possible fall early this AM. R5's local hospital Lab Results Summary dated 10/12/2022 documents a blood glucose level of 273 with the normal range listed as 65-110. On 10/19/22 at 9:32 AM, R5 stated the facility staff didn't stick his finger (blood glucose monitoring) or give him his insulin. R5 stated his blood sugar was a little high while he was at the facility. When asked what symptoms he would have when his blood sugars were elevated R5 stated, dizziness and weakness. On 10/18/22 at 4:00 PM, V5 (Family Member) stated R5 was admitted to the facility for physical therapy after a hospital stay for a motor vehicle accident with a subsequent brain bleed. V5 stated on 10/08/22 R5 was re-admitted to the hospital from dialysis for evaluation for complaints of chest pain. V5 stated on 10/10/22 she transported R5 back to the facility and delivered his hospital discharge orders to the facility staff. V5 sated on 10/11/22 she stopped to visit R5 on her lunch break and an unknown CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) mentioned he seemed a little confused. V5 stated that was not normal for R5 but he sometimes gets tired after dialysis. V5 stated after sitting with R5 she determined R5 did not seem himself intermittently throughout her visit. V5 stated she asked R5 if he had been getting his blood sugars checked and he said he had not. V5 stated she asked R5 if he had been getting his insulin and he wasn't sure. V5 stated she spoke with the nurse (believed to be V11) and told V11 about R5's Dexcom (continuous glucose monitor) in his room and V11 stated he would share it with the other nurse's. V5 stated on 10/12/22 she was notified by a family member R5 had fallen. V5 stated she spoke with V2 (DON/Director of Nurses) on the phone on 10/12/22 and asked her if R5 had been receiving his insulin and V2 stated they had been checking his blood sugar with R5's reader and had been administering R5's insulin. V5 stated after she got off work, she asked the facility if they had gotten the CT scan, she had requested to ensure R5's intermittent confusion and falling were not results of the brain bleed worsening and they had not, so V5 signed R5 out of the facility and took him to the local emergency room for evaluation. V5 stated upon returning to the facility she reported to the nurse working that R5 needed his insulin and the nurse (V14) stated R5 did not have orders for insulin. V5 stated she went home and got R5's insulin to administer to him. V5 stated R5 administered his insulin himself as his blood sugars were over 300. V5 stated around midnight V14 came to R5's room and reported she had found R5's insulin orders and R5 had not been administered insulin since his admission to the facility on [DATE]. V5 stated she asked V2 on 10/13/22 why she had told her R5 had been getting his insulin when in fact he had not and V2 stated the nursing staff had told her he was. V5 stated then V2 told her R5 did have blood glucose monitoring ordered and V5 told V2 that ordered was put in at midnight on 10/12/22 after it was determined they weren't being done. V5 stated at this point R5 had returned to his normal baseline since his blood sugars were back within normal range. R5's FreeStyle Libre 2 AGP Report documents R5's blood glucose readings and was obtained from V5 (Family Member) on 10/20/22 at 7:06 AM. This report dated 10/7/22 to 10/13/22 documents R5's blood sugar reading on 10/07/22 at approximately 8 PM as being 226. There are no blood sugar readings documented for 10/08, 10/09, 10/10, and 10/11/22. The report documents on 10/12/22 beginning at 6:00 PM and ending at midnight, R5's blood sugars were 238, 241, 266, 298, 307, 322, 312, 275, 252, 248, 240, and 215. R5's blood sugars on 10/13/22 beginning at 2:00 AM and ending at 12:00 PM are 192, 182, 180, and 154. This indicates R5's blood sugars were as high as 322 before being administered insulin on 10/12/22 and down to 154 after getting insulin. On 10/19/22 at 1:15 PM, V11 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated he provided care for R5 one day (unable to recall which day). R5's MAR dated 10/1/22 to 10/31/22 documents V11 signed off as administering medications on 10/11/22. V11 stated he knew R5 had the Dexcom (blood glucose monitor/reader) because V5 (daughter) had told him it was there, and some nurses were having issues using it. When asked if he administered insulin to R5, V11 stated he didn't recall giving R5 any injections. On 10/20/22 at 6:45 AM, V14 (LPN) stated she worked at the facility on 10/12/22 and provided care to R5 when he returned to the facility from the emergency room on this same day. V14 stated when they (R5 and V5) returned from the emergency room they told her they had stopped at the cafeteria and eaten so he would need his insulin. V14 stated she informed them she didn't have physician orders for R5 to receive insulin. V14 stated V5 gave her R5's sliding scale that he had been following prior to admission to the facility. V14 stated she reviewed R5's admission paperwork/orders and located the physician orders for insulin. V14 stated the facility did not have the type of insulin R5 had ordered so V5 provided R5's home insulin for administration until it could be obtained from the pharmacy. On 10/19/22 at 1:35 PM, V12 (LPN) stated she only provided care one day while R5 was at the facility. V12 stated it was the last day R5 was at the facility (10/14/22), before being transferred to another Long-Term Care Facility. V12 stated she didn't administer R5's insulin because R5's daughter administered it. When asked if R5 had insulin in the medication cart, V12 stated, he didn't. On 10/20/2022 at 1:33 PM, V16 (Pharmacist) stated R5 did not have an order for insulin and /or insulin delivered to the facility from the pharmacy until 10/13/22. R5's Order Summary Report Active Orders as of: 10/13/2022 documents the following orders with start date of 10/13/22; blood glucose check before meals and bedtime as needed, blood glucose check before meals and bedtime, Humalog Kwik pen 100 unit/ml (milliliter) (with pending confirmation documented next to order) inject as per sliding scale if 0-70 = 0 unit, if 71-100 = 4 units, if 101-150 = 8 units, if 151-200 = 12 units, if 201-400 = 16 units, subcutaneously before meals, Novolog flex pen 100 unit/ml inject as per sliding scale before meals and bedtimes with the same sliding scale dosing as listed above, Tresiba 100 unit/ml inject 52 units subcutaneously in the morning. R5's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 10/01/22 to 10/31/22 documents an order for Tresiba Solution 100 unit/milliliter (ml) inject 52 units subcutaneously in the morning with a start date of 10/13/22 and the MAR documents it was administered on 10/13/22 and 10/14/22 at 8:00 AM. R5's MAR does not document Tresiba was administered on any other days during R5's stay at the facility. This indicates R5 did not receive Tresiba insulin as ordered on 10/08, 10/11, and 10/12/22. However, V5 reported self-administering R5's insulin on the night of 10/12/22. R5's MAR dated 10/01/22 to 10/31/22 documents an order for NovoLog flex pen 100 unit/ml inject as per sliding scale if 0-70 =0 units, 71-100 = 4 units, 101-150=8 units, 151-200 = 12 units, 201-400 = 16 units inject subcutaneously before meals with a start date of 10/13/22 at 5:00 AM. R5's MAR documents R5's blood sugar was 180 and 12 units of NovoLog insulin was administered on 10/13/22 at 5:00 AM. R5's MAR does not document R5 received any other doses of sliding scale insulin from day of admission on [DATE] until day of discharge on [DATE]. R5's MAR dated 10/01/22 to 10/31/22 documents an order for blood glucose checks before meals and at bedtime with a start dated of 10/13/22 at 5:00 AM. R5's MAR documents the following blood glucose results 10/13/22 5:00 AM - 180, 10/13/22 11:00 AM 154, 10/13/22 4:00 PM -131, 10/13/22 8:00 PM - 210, 10/14/22 5:00 AM - 161, 10/14/22 11:00 AM -162. This indicates R5 should have received sliding scale insulin on 10/13/22 at 11:00 AM, 4:00 PM, and 8:00 PM and on 10/14/22 at 5:00 AM and 11:00 AM. R5's MAR does not document the sliding scale insulin was administered as ordered. On 10/21/22 at 9:45 AM, V2 (DON) stated there were insulin orders for R5 on his hospital discharge orders, but it was confusing because some of it was handwritten in. V2 stated if it isn't handwritten by the physician, then it throws her off. When asked what her expectation would be, in that situation, V2 stated she would expect the nursing staff to call the physician and clarify the orders. When asked if she did a med error report V2 stated, No, I will. At 1:55 PM on this same date V2 stated the nurse responsible for reviewing and transcribing R5's admission orders, no longer works at the facility. V2 stated she was made aware R5 had not received his insulin the day he came back from the hospital (10/12/22). V2 stated when she became aware of it, she reviewed the orders, and did an audit of each resident on insulin on 10/20/22. On 10/25/22 at 3:00 PM, V2 (DON) stated R5's medication administration record does not document R5 received sliding scale insulin as ordered by the physician. V2 confirmed the blood glucose checks were done as ordered and R5 should have received sliding scale insulin. V2 stated she would consider it a medication error and she would expect insulin to be administered as ordered. On 10/21/22 at 11:30 AM, this surveyor reviewed R5's orders and administration records with V4 (Physician) which documented R5 should have received long-acting insulin as well as sliding scale insulin. V4 stated, That is inexcusable. V4 stated he takes that very seriously. Reviewed with V4 what R5's blood glucose levels (273) were when he was evaluated at the hospital and V4 stated he didn't think R5 not getting his insulin was a contributing factor for the fall. When asked what the potential negative outcomes are for a diabetic to not get insulin as ordered V4 stated, Ketoacidosis, coma, and possible death. R5's undated care plan documents a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with no focus area or interventions documented related to the diagnosis. The facility Medication Variance Report dated 10/13/22 documents R5 had an order of Tresiba inject 52 units subcutaneously every morning related to Type 2 diabetes mellitus with the order date documented as 10/10/22. The variance report documents R5 didn't receive the medication. The report documents it was a missed order under transcribing error. The report documents V4 (Physician) was notified with no date or time of notification. The report documents (V5) asked V14 (LPN) about insulin, which V14 found on orders but not in (electronic health record). Nurse (V14) then put all insulin orders in (electronic health record). The report documents no harm with circumstances or events have capacity to cause event, marked. The report documents the involved staff person was educated. 2. R1's facility admission Record with a print date of 10/20/2022 documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. R1's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 10, which indicates R1 has a moderate cognitive impairment. R1's Order Summary Report Active Orders as of 10/20/2022 documents a physician order for Levemir solution 100 unit/ml inject 80 units subcutaneously two times a day with a start date of 5/12/2022. On 10/18/22 at 8:00 AM, V9 (RN/Registered Nurse) was observed administering medications to R1. V9 drew up 80 units of Levemir insulin in a syringe to administer to R1. When this surveyor observed the bottle of insulin V9 had drawn the Levemir from, this surveyor noted the name on the insulin vial was R7's not R1's. When asked if it was R1's insulin she had drawn up to administer, V9 stated R1's insulin was on back order. V9 stated she was sure R1 had insulin the day before. When asked if it was common practice to borrow insulin from other resident's V9 stated it wasn't. V9 stated she would see if there was any Levemir insulin in the emergency supply and if so, administer that to R1 instead of R7's insulin. V9 was then observed disposing of the original insulin syringe with R7's insulin in it and administering Levemir insulin 80 units from an insulin pen, obtained from the E-kit, with a handwritten label with R1's name on it. On 10/18/22 at 3:34 PM, V9 (RN) stated she believed R1 had his own bottle of insulin when she worked the day before. When asked the process for ordering medications V9 stated the nursing staff call the pharmacy. On 10/20/22 at 9:52 AM, V15 (LPN) stated she knew there were a couple of residents who were out of insulin, and they had to borrow other residents' insulin to administer to them. V15 stated she knew they weren't supposed to do that, but they didn't have any in the emergency kit. V15 stated she couldn't remember which residents were out of insulin. On 10/20/22 at 1:33 PM, V16 (Pharmacist) stated R1 had a 10-milliliter vial of insulin delivered to the facility on 9/24/22 which should last for 12 or 12 and ½ days. V16 stated R1 did not have insulin delivered again from the pharmacy until 10/18/22 (24 days). V16 stated he didn't see a reorder request from the facility through the electronic health records or through a fax. V16 stated if the facility was out of a medication the procedure is to call the pharmacy or send a request electronically for a refill. V16 stated if they needed the medication stat, they would send it to the facility. V16 stated since R1's insulin was a routine medication they should have ordered it a few days before they were out of the medication. V16 stated borrowing other residents' insulin was not a current standard of practice. V16 checked the emergency kit and stated the facility did not have a vial of Levemir in it but they did have Levemir in a pen form and if they were going to administer it via a pen instead of a vial, they would need to call the doctor and get a physician's order. On 10/21/22 at 9:45 AM, V2 (DON) stated V9 grabbed R6's insulin bottle by mistake and R1 was not out of insulin prior to the medication administration observation. V2 stated the facility staff had been using a Levemir Pen to administer R1's insulin and there was a physician's order for it. When asked how she explained the pharmacy saying R1 would have been out of insulin V2 stated, Well in the past the pharmacy sucks. I don't know what their problem is there. V2 stated they have had issues getting medications delivered from the pharmacy. R1's Order Summary Report Active Orders as of 10/20/2022 does not document a physician order to use Levemir Insulin via a pen. R1's MAR dated 10/01/22 to 10/31/22 documents R1 received Levemir insulin as ordered by the physician. On 10/21/22 at 11:30 AM, V3 (Assistant DON) stated R1 had been in and out of the hospital and had some changes made to his insulin, and it was possible R1 had extra insulin in the vial that would have made it last longer than the pharmacy said it would. On 10/21/22 at 11:30 AM, V4 (Physician) stated facility staff should not borrow insulin from other residents. The facility Medication Administration Policy dated 1/1/2015 documents under, II. Administration of Medications. Medications must be administered in accordance with a physician's order, e.g., the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right route, and right time. Medications supplied to one resident may not be administered to another resident.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain residents accessible areas free of debris, ob...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain residents accessible areas free of debris, objectionable odors and in a sanitary condition. This has the potential to affect all 67 residents living in the facility. Findings Include: On 10/18/22 at 6:00 AM this surveyor observed the floor by the shower room around the nurse's station near [NAME] hall to have torn papers, toilet paper, and other unidentifiable debris on it. It appeared to need to be mopped with unidentifiable smears across it and a strong urine odor down [NAME] Hall. This debris was still on the floor at 6:48 AM and the strong urine smell was still present at 11:12 AM. On 10/18/22 at 6:04 AM the room labeled Resident Restroom located on the hall leading to the dining room had toilet paper torn on the floor and the floor in front of the commode had black smears on it. On 10/18/22 at 6:05 AM prior to breakfast being served to the majority of residents the dining room had eggs and other debris under a table with no residents sitting at the same table. On 10/19/22 at 3:32 PM this surveyor observed a torn glove on the floor outside of R8's room with what appeared to be an empty normal saline vial next to it. There was a very strong urine odor present on the [NAME] hallway. On 10/18/22 at 6:21 AM, R8 stated they don't keep her room very clean, and she has seen dirty linens on the floor in the hallways. R8's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 8/27/22 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 14, which indicates R8 is cognitively intact. On 10/18/22 at 11:25 AM, R10 stated the facility staff don't clean her room regularly. R10 stated if she wants her room clean, she has to ask staff when they are cleaning in the hallway outside her room. R10's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 11 which indicates R10 has a moderate cognitive impairment. On 10/18/22 at 3:00 PM, V8 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) stated the floors need to be swept and mopped when she gets to the facility at 6:00 AM for her shift. V8 stated odors are a problem at the facility, in the rooms and in the hallways. The facility Concern/Compliment Form dated 7/6/22 documents R20 reported two bags of dirty linens left in front of his sink. The Concern/Compliment form documents, laundry came and got laundry from the room. On 10/19/22 at 12:55 PM, V10 (Social Services) stated R20 discharged home. V10 stated the dirty isolation linens referenced on the Concern/Compliment form dated 07/06/22 were probably left in R20's room because there was a dispute on whose job it was to remove them. V10 stated they got laundry to get the bags out of R20's room and educated staff on getting the bags out even if it wasn't their job. The facility Concern/Compliment Form dated 7/13/22 with an illegible resident name, documents, Bathrooms are not getting cleaned/trash not taken out. With Corrective Action documented as education and training/HK (housekeeping) & CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). The anonymous Concern/Compliment Form dated 6/8/22 documents Trash not being taken out in bathroom, room, and sunroom.: Corrective Action listed as HK/Laundry had some new hires-we did education and training on this. Hiring more staff. The facility Resident Council Meeting minutes dated 5/11/22 documents, Housekeeping lacking on weekends. The facility Resident Council Meeting minutes dated 7/13/22 documents, Bathroom trash and room trash not being taken out. The facility Resident Council Meeting minutes dated 8/10/22 documents, Trash in rooms and bathrooms are getting better, still problem at times. Bathroom (toilet, sinks) need cleaned. Rooms not cleaned daily. Resident bathroom by dining room looks bad- needs cleaned. The facility Complaint Resolution Form dated 8/10/22 documents, Problem: Trash in room, trash in bathroom, bathroom sinks, and toilets need cleaned, rooms not cleaned daily, resident bathroom not cleaned daily. Department: Housekeeping, Resolution: Write up for improper paper completion. The facility Resident Council Meeting minutes dated 9/14/22 documents, Room and bathrooms not getting cleaned often/daily. On 10/26/22 at 11:25 AM, V29 (Housekeeper) stated this was only her fourth day working at the facility as a housekeeper. V29 stated all the resident rooms are cleaned every day. V29 stated she has only been responsible for the rooms on one hall as she hasn't been trained on any of the others yet. V29 stated all the housekeepers are responsible for cleaning the common areas. On 10/26/22 at 11:31 AM, V28 (Housekeeper) stated he is typically scheduled to clean on the memory care unit. V28 stated they usually switch every week but lately they have been on the same halls. V28 stated he hasn't seen any floors with debris or had any residents complain to him about cleanliness. On 10/26/22 at 11:38 AM, V27 (Housekeeper) stated she was just moved to a housekeeping position last week. V29 stated she was the activities assistant prior to that. V27 stated she has had residents (unknown) complain to her their rooms weren't being cleaned. V27 stated she felt like housekeeping staff needed to be retrained and have specific times to clean the common areas. When asked who was responsible for cleaning the floors around the nurse's station where the debris was observed V27 stated, I am not really sure. V27 stated as far as she knew there wasn't a specific cleaning schedule and when she came to work in the morning, she just started cleaning resident rooms. On 10/26/22 at 1:57 PM, V25 (Housekeeping Supervisor) stated he had been the housekeeping supervisor for about two weeks. V25 stated he was off work for a medical reason and when he came back to work, they asked him to be the housekeeping supervisor along with his current position of maintenance supervisor. When asked what the housekeeping schedule was, V25 stated he was going to assign halls and put it on the housekeepers' schedules. V25 stated he started that Monday (10/24/22) and he thought it was going well. V25 stated before that the housekeepers would just go where they wanted to. When asked who was responsible for cleaning the common areas V25 stated he was still working on who was going to clean the common areas. V25 stated he wasn't sure anyone had been told to specifically clean the common areas. V25 stated he hadn't any complaints the facility wasn't being cleaned and hadn't seen any issues with the common areas being cleaned since he has been back to work. On 10/26/22 at 9:41 AM when asked about the strong urine odor on [NAME] Hall near the nurse's station V1 (Administrator) stated there is a resident on that hall who refuses to shower at times and has a strong odor to their urine. V1 stated they were able to get her to shower after this surveyor brought the odor to their attention. When asked if that was the first time, he was aware of the odor, V1 stated it was. V1 stated some days it is there and some days it isn't. When asked about the debris in the floors V1 stated residents go in and out of the door in the common area, it has been windy, and the leaves like to blow in. When asked how often they were cleaned V1 stated they get cleaned daily and as needed. The facility Daily Census dated 10/16/22 given to this surveyor on 10/18/22 documents 67 residents reside at the facility.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a pest free environment. This has the potenti...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a pest free environment. This has the potential to affect all 67 residents residing at the facility. Findings Include: 1. R10's facility admission Record with a print date of 11/7/22, documents R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R10's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 9/10/22 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 11 which indicates R10 has a moderate cognitive impairment. On 10/18/22 at 11:25 AM. R10 was observed in her room sitting in a chair. R10 stated she has ants, but the flies are better now that it is cooler outside. R10 stated she puts a napkin over her cup, and points to the cup sitting on her bedside table, with a napkin over it. R10 stated that way the flies can't get on her straw. 2. R12's facility admission Record with a print date of 11/10/22 documents R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include dementia. R12's MDS dated [DATE] documents R12 has a BIMS score of 04, which indicates R12 has a severe cognitive deficit. On 10/19/22 at 3:32 PM this surveyor observed R12 lying in bed with a blanket covering all but her feet and head. There were flies (approximately 4-6) flying around and sitting on the blankets covering R12. This surveyor reported the flies to V8 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant). On 10/20/22 at 9:36 AM this surveyor observed flies on R12 who was again, lying in bed, covered with a blanket with her head and feet sticking out. The flies were reported to V17 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse). This surveyor attempted to speak with R12 related to the flies. R12 was confused and not able to answer questions appropriately. On 10/20/22 at 11:51 AM, V17 (LPN) stated she looked at R12 after this surveyor reported the flies and didn't see any. V17 stated she had staff get R12 up and assist her with a shower and had housekeeping clean the room. 3. On 10/18/22 at 11:29 AM this surveyor observed a gnat flying over the open pudding/applesauce sitting on the medication cart on the Daisy/Tulip Hall. V31 (LPN) swiped the gnat off and threw the applesauce/pudding away. On 10/19/22 at 1:35 PM, V12 (LPN) stated she will occasionally see a gnat, but the facility has a spraying service that comes in. On 10/26/22 at 11:38 AM, V27 (Housekeeper) stated she had seen flies/gnats at the facility, but they weren't nearly as bad as they used to be. On 10/26/22 at 9:41 AM V1 (Administrator) stated the day I notified him of the flies on R12, the facility had the exterminator come in. V1 stated the facility staff did a deep cleaning of the room, and it eliminated the issue. V1 stated the exterminator has been coming weekly. When asked if he had been notified of the flies prior to this surveyor reporting them to him, V1 stated he had, and that was why he had the exterminator coming in. When asked if he documented anything related to the report of flies in R12's room V1 gave this surveyor the following Maintenance Work Order. The facility Maintenance Work Order dated 10/12/22 documents a High Priority for pest problems (flies) on [NAME] Hall. This work order has a note written at the bottom that documents, Called (names of two separate exterminators). The local exterminator reports document on 8/23/22 the facility was treated for live roaches and on 9/15/22 the report documents, Inspected Equipment (tincats/bait stations/fly lig, Inspected/Treated Common Areas, Treated Kitchen for Live Roaches. The second local exterminator reports document on 10/05/22 the facility was treated for rodents, roaches, and spiders and on 10/15/22 the facility was treated for rodents, roaches, spiders, drain flies, and ants. The facility Pest Control policy dated 11/28/12 documents The Environmental Services Director will be responsible for coordinating the facility pest control .The pest control program will be conducted on a regular and as needed basis. Employees are instructed to promptly report all observations of pests to their department heads .Outside openings shall be protected against the entrance of insects by tight fitting, self-closing doors, closed windows, screening, controlled air currents or other means. The facility shall be kept in such condition and cleaning procedures used to prevent the harborage or feeding of insects or rodents. Garbage and trash shall be promptly removed from the premises in accordance with local and state waste management guidelines. Garbage and trash containers shall be emptied when full and cleaned prior to returning to the appropriate area. The facility Daily Census dated 10/16/22 given to this surveyor on 10/18/22 documents 67 residents reside at the facility.
Apr 2022 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 4/18/22 at 10:39 AM, during a facility tour, R62 was observed scooting a chair in the hallway of the Dementia unit and slowly...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 4/18/22 at 10:39 AM, during a facility tour, R62 was observed scooting a chair in the hallway of the Dementia unit and slowly tumbled partially over the chair, and staff immediately responded and prevented R62 from hitting the chair legs or floor. R62 stated he was bending over to pick something up off the floor (nothing was seen there) and said I'm okay, I'm okay. V23 (Activity Aide) was present and said that R62 has a history of pushing chairs down the hallway and falls. V23 said staff monitor R62 continuously for falls. R23 said R62 was ambulatory and will not use a wheelchair. On 4/20/2022 at 11:00 AM, R62 was noted to have 5-6 steri strips intact to the crown of his head. V14 (Registered Nurse/RN) was present and stated that she didn't know what happened. R62 had a fall within the past day or two, and it isn't her (V14) usual work area, but she has been doing neuro checks for (R62). V14 said R62 gets aggressive. Look at his left clenched fist. R62 was seated in a chair by the nursing station and his left hand positioned with a clenched fist. The facility's Resident Matrix, dated 4/18/2022, documents R62 has Alzeheimer's/Dementia and history of falls. R62's admission Record documents the following diagnoses: Unspecified Dementia With Behavioral Disturbance; Stenosis Of Coronary Artery Stent, Sequela; Personal History Of Transient Ischemic Attack, (TIA), And Cerebral Infarction Without Residual Deficits; Unsteadiness on feet; Other Lack Of Coordination; Cognitive Communication Deficit; Other Abnormalities Of Gait And Mobility. R62's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/08/2022 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 2 and indicates that R62 is severely cognitively impaired. A Nurse's Note dated 4/18/2022 at 6:15 PM by V31 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) reads: Resident sent to ER (Emergency Room) per V32's (Attending Physician) orders for laceration from witnessed fall. A Nurse's Note dated 4/18/2022 at 9:10 PM documents: Resident returned from ER in stable condition with negative head and neck CT (Computerized Tomography). Nurse started neuros (Neurological checks) per facility protocol. An Incident IDT (Interdisciplinary) Note dated 4/19/2022 at 9:23 AM, reads: Attendees Present: V1 (Administrator), V29 (Corporate), V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) - Summary of the incident: Resident (R62) was wearing his shoes on the wrong feet and fell hitting his head. Root cause of the incident: Wearing shoes on wrong feet. Intervention and care plan updated: Placed shoes on the right feet and notified the CNA (Certified Nursing Aide) staff on floor to monitor. There was no documentation to indicate that V27 was notified of the accident or the need to send to the ER for evaluation and treatment. The admission Record for R62 documents that V27 is the Responsible Party and Emergency Contact #1 for R62. A Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] at 10:58 PM by V31 (LPN) documents a score of 10 and indicates that R62 is at risk for falls. An electronic chart record titled, Other Skin Condition Report, dated 4/18/2022 at 6:15 PM, completed by V31 (LPN) documents Section D, #3. Date Family/Responsible party was notified of new area/status update: 4/18/2022. On 4/21/2022 at 11:40 AM, V27 (Family) was visiting R62. V27 said that R62 has had a tough week. R62 continued to have 5-6 steri strips intact to the crown of his head. Asked V27 if she knew what happened with R62. V27 stated she is the person that should be called when there is a fall, but nobody called her. V27 said that another family member was visiting (R62) on Wednesday (4/20/2022) and saw the steri strips and notified her about the fall . and said that he got his feet tangled up in a wheelchair or something. V27 stated she had not visited since last Sunday (4/17/2022). V27 said the facility did not call her and notify her that R62 had fallen or was being sent to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. V27 said she heard about it from the family member who visited the facility on Wednesday, 4/18/2022. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify a residents responsible party of a fall with injury and transport to the emergency room for 1 of 18 residents (R62) reviewed for notification in the sample of 33. Findings include:
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on Interview, Observation and Record Review the facility failed to assess residents appropriately for eating functional ab...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on Interview, Observation and Record Review the facility failed to assess residents appropriately for eating functional abilities for the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Resident Assessment and Care Screening Quarterly Assessment for 1 of 3 residents (R277) reviewed for assessments in a sample of 33. Findings Include: R277's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Version 3.0 Resident Assessment and Care Screening Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documents R277's Functional Status with Eating as 1 - Supervision, Encouragement or Cueing with the Support Provided as Set up help only. On 04/20/22 at 2:15 PM, V19 (Occupational Therapy/Therapy Director) stated, R277 was an independent eater, he had no speech therapy notes due to not having any swallowing concerns. R277 would eat in the dining room, his room or the sun room. V19 (Occupational Therapy/Therapy Director) stated, R277 did not need Supervision, Encouragement or Cueing while eating. On 04/20/22 at 2:32 PM V30 (Registered Nurse) stated, she does not know why R277's MDS would state that R277 needed supervision, he ate independently. He ate in the dining room, his room and sometimes the sun room. On 04/21/22 at: 11:00, 11:03, 11:06, 11:10, 11:13, and 11:20 AM, V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA), V11 (CNA), V13 (CNA), V16 (CNA), V18 (CNA) and V21 (CNA) respectively, stated, R277 needed assistance opening his milk sometimes and removing some lids off his food tray but ate independently. The CNAs stated they mark the resident needs supervision with eating if they open the milk and remove the lids from beverages in the CNA charting. They do not keep them in visual range. On 04/21/22 at 1:10 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated R277 ate independently, he did not need any supervision. V1 stated, the MDS documents R277 as needing supervision while eating, but it is incorrect. On 04/21/22 at 1:30 PM, V3 (MDS Coordinator) stated, the CNAs mark the resident as needing supervision if they assist them with their tray, not actually keeping a visual on the resident. The staff will need to be retrained on how to appropriately mark the CNA charting.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who require assistance receive a ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who require assistance receive a shower for 1 of 18 residents (R53) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living assistance in the sample of 33. Findings include: On 4/18/22 at 4:15 PM, V24 (Family) stated she has to complain to the staff all of the time, because they don't give R53 his showers 2 times per week. On 4/18/22 at 4:50 PM, V25 (Family) stated he visits R26 three times every day and some days if her hair isn't combed or she needs a bath, I get onto them and they will comb her hair and give her a bath. On 4/19/22 at 11:00 AM, R53 stated he was supposed to get a shower yesterday (4/18/22) but he didn't get one. V53 stated there are many days he doesn't get a shower because they are short staffed. R53 stated they don't have enough help on the evening shift either. On 4/20/22 at 11:30 AM, V26 (Certified Nurses Aide) stated she used to be the shower aide and the shower schedule needed to be updated because a lot of the residents are no longer in the facility and the new residents hadn't been put on the shower schedule and some of the residents haven't been getting their showers. V26 stated she will give R53 his shower today. On 4/20/22 at 12:45 PM, V26 was giving R53 his shower. On 4/20/22 at 1:30 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) updated the shower schedule and stated he was going to assign a shower aide to give showers every day. R53's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents under Section C that R53 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status of 14 indicating R53 is cognitively intact. In Section G, R53 is totally dependent and requires 1 person to assist with showers. R53's Care Plan dated 3/3/22 documents under Interventions: Bathing/Showering: R53 requires limited/extensive assist for bathing/shower, set up supplies, give verbal cues and allow extra time as needed. The facility's Bathing-Shower and Tub Bath policy dated 11/28/2012, documents under Purpose: To ensure resident's cleanliness to maintain proper hygiene and dignity. Under Guidelines: A shower, tub bath/sponge bath will be offered according to resident's preference two times per week or according to the resident's preferred frequency and as needed or requested.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to obtain residents weight as ordered by the physician for 1 of 18 residents (R9) reviewed for following physician orders in the sample of 33. ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to obtain residents weight as ordered by the physician for 1 of 18 residents (R9) reviewed for following physician orders in the sample of 33. Findings include: 1. Physician Orders dated 09/11/2021, document R9 has a diagnosis of Lympadema and should be weighed daily in the morning. R9's electronic medical record documents 28 of 60 days, in the weight and vital signs section are blank. The blank dates for 2022 include February 18, 23, and 24; March 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 26, 28 and 31; April 5, 7, 12, 14, 17, and 18. There were no weights documented on the weight record for March 19 through 22, or March 26 and 28. On 04/21/2022 at 11:40 AM, V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated R9 refuses to get out of bed some days. V5 said they used to have a mechanical lift scale but it does not work and she is not sure how long it has been out of commission. March 27 is the last time documentation indicates the mechanical lift scale was used to weigh R9. V5 said if R9 refuses to be weighed she charts it on the Medication Administration Record, A review of The Medication Administration Record documents to see the progress note on 04/17/2022 regarding R9's weight. The 04/17/2022 progress notes did not document anything regarding R9's weight. No other refusals were documented on the April Medication Administration Record. A review of The Weight Summary for 60 days between February 18 and April 20 of 2022, documents R9 refused to be weighed only one time, that was on 04/15/2022.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement effective interventions to include cognition appropriate i...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement effective interventions to include cognition appropriate interventions to prevent falls for 1 of 4 residents (R72) reviewed for accidents/incidents in the sample of 33. Findings include: R72's Medical Diagnoses document R72 has Schizophrenia, Frontal, Temporal Dementia, Panic Disorder, Hypertension, Major Depressive Disorder, Hypothyroidism, Atherosclerosis, Hypotension, and Congestive Heart Failure. R72's Physician's Orders dated April, 2022 document R72 takes the following psychotropic medications; Lurasidone 20 mg (milligrams) daily, Buproprion 300 mg 1 daily, Clonazepam 0.5 mg daily and Venlafaxine 75 mg and Venlafaxine 150 mg daily. R72's Progress Notes dated 4/9/22 document R72 had an unwitnessed fall on 4/8/22 at 2:44 PM, Resident found sitting on floor next to bed. Skin tear noted on right lower, front leg. Area 2.2 cm x 1.3 cm and superficial. No complaints of pain noted. Urine noted on floor and wearing wet socks. R72's Progress Notes dated 4/8/22 at 10:40 PM, document R72 had a witnessed fall while at the nurses station. Resident fell on buttocks attempting to transfer from wheelchair to chair in common area. R72's Progress Notes on 4/4/22 at 10:30 AM, document R72 fell in her bathroom taking herself to toilet and fell with pants around her ankles and fell against the door. R72's Progress Notes on 3/31/22 at 5:30 PM, document R72 had an unwitnessed fall in her bathroom. R72's Falls Occurrence Reports document the following dates that R72 has fallen; 10/28/21, 11/27/21, 12/1/21, 1/14/22, 1/26/22, 2/21/22, 3/2/22, 3/23/22, 3/27/22, 3/31/22, 4/4/22, 4/8/22, and 4/9/22. R72's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents under Section C that R72 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status of 9 indicating R72 has impaired cognition and poor decision-making skills. Section G of R72's MDS documents that R72 requires assistance of 2 persons for transfers and for toileting, requires supervision with 1 person assist. In Section G, under Balance During Transfers and Walking, line A.) Moving from seated to standing position; #2. Not steady, only able to stabilize with staff assistance. B.) Walking; #1 Not steady, but able to stabilize without staff assistance. D. Moving on and off Toilet; #2. Not steady, only able to stabilize with staff assistance. E.) Surface to Surface Transfers; #2 Not steady, only able to stabilize with staff assistance. R72's Care Plan for Falls dated 3/25/22, under Interventions, documents; 1.) Be sure the residents call light is within reach and encourage resident to use it. Resident needs prompt response for requests for assistance; 2.) Ambulation Program (there is no definition as to what the Ambulation Program entails); 3.) Resident in proper wheelchair daily; 4.) Follow facility Fall Protocol (not identified); 5.) Grabber in room for use; 6.) Hand Bell placed on resident bedside table for R72 to use when needing assistance; 7.) Non-skid pad in wheelchair; 8.) Non-skid socks while in bed; 9.) Proper fitting shoes; 10.) Toilet every 2 hours (states she will be re-educated to ask for help or ring bell), 10.) Provide activities that promote exercise and strength building where possible (Activities not identified). These interventions have no dates to reflect when they were initiated or evaluated to ensure they are appropriate for R72. Under Guidelines: bullet point #10 under Care Plan incorporates; Identification of all risk/issue; Addresses each fall; Interventions are changed with each fall, as appropriate, Preventative measures. There are no dates that coincide with the Falls Occurrence Reports that the interventions were changed with each fall. On 4/20/22 at 10:00 AM, V15 (Certified Nurses Aide) stated R72 usually takes herself to the bathroom and she will get out of her wheelchair and sit in a regular chair. V15 stated she has never seen R72 use a grabber to pick things up off the floor and she has never seen R72 use the bell that is in her bedside table to ring for assistance before she stands up. V15 stated R72 is very confused most of the time and she doesn't follow directions very well. V15 also stated she hasn't walked R72, she just gets her up from her wheelchair. On 4/21/22 at 9:55 AM, V16 (Certified Nurses Aide) and V18 (Certified Nurses Aide) both stated they thought R72 was in therapy and they were walking R72. V16 and V18 both stated R72 puts herself on the commode and into other chairs. V16 stated R72 usually sits down in the floor on purpose. V16 and V18 both stated they have never seen R72 fall and are not aware that R72 has ever been injured from a fall. On 4/20/22 at 2:00 PM, V19 (Occupational Therapist, Therapy Director) stated R72's Ambulation Program would be a restorative intervention and V20 (Registered Nurse) is over the restorative programs and she walks some of the residents, but the Certified Nurses Aides are supposed to walk the residents. V19 stated she couldn't say if the staff were walking R72 per her care plan. On 4/19/22, 4/20/22 and 4/21/22 from 8:00 AM to 3:30 PM, R72 was observed in her wheelchair throughout the day. R72 wasn't observed being walked by any of the staff on either of these days. On 4/18/22 at 12:15 PM, V72 was sitting in the dining room in her wheelchair and had voided and she was trying to wipe the urine away. At 12:35 PM, V4 (Certified Nurses Aide) came to take R72 to be changed after this surveyor informed V4 that R72 was wet. V4 stated R72 had not been toileted before going to the dining room for lunch. The facility's policy, Fall Prevention Program dated 11/28/12 documents under Purpose: To assure the safety of all residents in the facility, when possible. The program will include measures which determine the individual needs of each resident by assessing the risk of falls and implementation of appropriate interventions to provide necessary supervision and assistive devices are utilized as necessary. Quality Assurance Programs will monitor the program to assure ongoing effectiveness.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide clean and odor free hallways, resident bathrooms, floors, linens and a tidy, uncluttered shower area. This has the pot...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide clean and odor free hallways, resident bathrooms, floors, linens and a tidy, uncluttered shower area. This has the potential to affect all 24 residents residing on the Dementia unit. Findings include: The facility's List of Resident Roster documents there are 24 residents currently residing on the Dementia unit. 1. On 4/18/2022 at 11:00 AM on the Dementia unit, the soiled utility room had a large gray container of soiled adult disposable briefs that had no lid. There was no lid for the container noted in the room. The floor of the room was sticky and in need of mopping. The yellow soiled linen container was full and there was a lid nearby, but it was not on top of the container. The unpleasant odors from the soiled utility room were evident in the hallway where residents and visitors were frequently seated. The same observations were made on 4/20/2022 at 11:05 AM and again on 4/21/2022 at 9:20 AM. V17 (Maintenance Supervisor) was present on 4/21/2022 at this time and stated that they needed to have a lid for that container and he would look for one. 2. On 4/18/22 at 11:44 AM, R16 was napping in his bed and the bottoms of R16 bare feet were visible and were blackened from walking barefooted down the hallways. The floors of the Dementia unit were also slightly sticky at this time in the common use hallways. 3. On 4/18/2022 at 10:40 AM, R3's bathroom floor was soiled with a brown, moist substance and had an unpleasant odor. On 04/18/22 at 11:56 AM there were several half dollar size, dried, dripped brown spots on the floor of a resident bathroom shared by R6 and R38 with an unpleasant odor. There had been no housekeeping staff observed and surveyor asked V11 (Certified Nurse Aide/CNA) if the housekeeping staff had certain times of the day when they mop the unit and V11 replied, We just call them when we need them. 4. On 4/21/2022 at 9:05 AM, there was a large puddle on the floor located in the hallway near the dining room on the Dementia unit. The puddle looked like a wheeled cart or wheelchair had gone through it and left tracks on the floor. The floor was sticky and shoe footprints were seen tracked into nearby resident room of R23 and R30, where a resident was asleep in one of the 2 beds and did not appear wet. Upon return towards the puddle in the hallway, R63 was observed walking in the hallway near the puddle and the seat of her green slacks were wet. V13 (CNA) approached R63 and told her that she was wet and needed to come with her down the hallway to get changed. It took approximately 10 minutes for V13 to patiently walk R63 down to her room for a change of clothes. Meanwhile, V17 was observed to enter the unit with a housekeeping cart and mop the soiled floor by 9:15 AM. 5. On 4/21/2022 at 9:15 AM, there was an unlocked, opened cabinet in the shower room. The cabinet was disorganized and contained multiple unlabeled toiletries, an old discarded surgical mask, a fly swatter, a worn baseball style cap, gold and a pink basins containing unlabeled toiletries and debris, a hairdryer, and a nearly full sharps container. The cabinet was in need of cleaning and organizing. Directly outside of the shower room, the area was cluttered with a chair covered with multiple throw blankets, clothing items, and unused adult briefs; a large wheelchair with a wrinkled, used white pad in the seat; and a large stretcher and backboard. The stretcher was stored in front of a large 2 door storage cabinet and was cluttered with 2 large wheelchair foot pedals, a used bath towel, and a pillow with a wrinkled pillow case. The linen room on the Dementia unit was near the shower area. It was open and disorganized with multiple sheets and blankets noted on the floor. Best Practice Guidelines - Storing and Handling Clean Linen in Healthcare Facilities (February 20, 2018): Page 5, #3. Any linen dropped on the floor should be treated as soiled laundry and deposited into a soiled linen bag. The clean linen cart was disorganized. There were clean adult disposable briefs that had fallen on the floor from a cart stored in this same area.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 9 harm violation(s), $110,110 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 51 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $110,110 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 0/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Fairfield Senior Living & Rehabilitation Llc's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns FAIRFIELD SENIOR LIVING & REHABILITATION LLC an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Fairfield Senior Living & Rehabilitation Llc Staffed?

CMS rates FAIRFIELD SENIOR LIVING & REHABILITATION LLC's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes.

What Have Inspectors Found at Fairfield Senior Living & Rehabilitation Llc?

State health inspectors documented 51 deficiencies at FAIRFIELD SENIOR LIVING & REHABILITATION LLC during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 9 that caused actual resident harm, and 41 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Fairfield Senior Living & Rehabilitation Llc?

FAIRFIELD SENIOR LIVING & REHABILITATION LLC is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 104 certified beds and approximately 44 residents (about 42% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in FAIRFIELD, Illinois.

How Does Fairfield Senior Living & Rehabilitation Llc Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, FAIRFIELD SENIOR LIVING & REHABILITATION LLC's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.5 and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Fairfield Senior Living & Rehabilitation Llc?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Fairfield Senior Living & Rehabilitation Llc Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, FAIRFIELD SENIOR LIVING & REHABILITATION LLC has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Fairfield Senior Living & Rehabilitation Llc Stick Around?

FAIRFIELD SENIOR LIVING & REHABILITATION LLC has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.

Was Fairfield Senior Living & Rehabilitation Llc Ever Fined?

FAIRFIELD SENIOR LIVING & REHABILITATION LLC has been fined $110,110 across 7 penalty actions. This is 3.2x the Illinois average of $34,180. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Fairfield Senior Living & Rehabilitation Llc on Any Federal Watch List?

FAIRFIELD SENIOR LIVING & REHABILITATION LLC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.