CALHOUN NURSING & REHAB CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Calhoun Nursing & Rehab Center has a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance with some concerning issues. It ranks #123 out of 665 facilities in Illinois, placing it in the top half, and is the only option in Calhoun County, ranking #1 of 1. The facility is showing improvement, as it reduced its issues from 6 in 2024 to 2 in 2025. Staffing is a relative strength with a rating of 3 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate matching the state average at 46%, while RN coverage is good, exceeding 75% of Illinois facilities. However, it has received $51,058 in fines, which is average but raises some concerns about compliance. Specific incidents of concern include a failure to implement fall prevention measures for a resident who suffered multiple falls, including one that resulted in a fractured hip. Additionally, another resident experienced significant pain without timely relief, leading to distress from 10:48 AM to 3:10 PM due to delays in obtaining medication. While the facility has some strengths, these incidents and the Trust Grade suggest that families should carefully consider these factors when evaluating care for their loved ones.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Illinois
- #123/665
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 46% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $51,058 in fines. Higher than 64% of Illinois facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 40 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Illinois. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 28 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Illinois avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 28 deficiencies on record
Aug 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0627
(Tag F0627)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to involve the resident and resident representative in the development...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0628
(Tag F0628)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to document notice of transfer requirement for 1 of 3 residents (R2) r...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2024
4 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions to prevent falls for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 4 of 4 residents (R10, R2...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0882
(Tag F0882)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure they had a qualified Infection Preventionist responsible for the facility's Infection Control Program at the facility. This has the p...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0868
(Tag F0868)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program which meets at least quarterly with the required members, including th...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to investigate and provide treatment for bruises and abrasions to one of three residents (R2) reviewed for resident injury on the sample list o...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's family/emergency contact of a change in conditi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
8 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide pain relief for 1 of 16 residents (R51) review...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to obtain pain medication in a timely manner and have a ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to feed residents in a manner which promotes resident's d...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nutrition was provided as ordered and per standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (R10) reviewed for tube feeding m...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to utilize safe transfer techniques to prevent accidents ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R1's Care Plan, dated 7/26/21, documents I am incontinent of both bowel and bladder. I do wear incontinent protective underga...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and glove changes appropriately during care, and cleaning soiled bed mattress and wheelchair seat pad for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store medication, and label Tubersol. This has the potential to affect all 57 residents living in the facility.
Find...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2022
12 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. R37's Physician's Order, dated 05/02/2022, documents, (1) Cleanse right heel with wound cleanser apply skin prep daily and pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 8. On 5/18/22 at 10:25 AM, R9 stated I liked to go eat in the dining room. I really wasn't too much into the activities, but I d...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 5. On 5/16/22 at 9:50 AM, R41 was sitting in his wheelchair with Oxygen being administered at one and a half liters per nasal ca...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 6. On 5/18/22 at 10:25 AM, R9 stated I liked to go eat in the dining room. I really wasn't too much into the activities, but I d...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. On 5/17/22 at 9:42 AM, V11, CNA, and V7, CNA assisted R3 to bed using a full body mechanical lift. V11 and V7 did not check t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely and complete incontinent care for 4 of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care, including the changing of the humidified bottle and the dating and timing of both the humidified bot...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0700
(Tag F0700)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. On 05/18/22 at 10:00 AM, R37 was lying in bed, rails were up at the head of his bed.
R37's side rail evaluation, dated 6/23/2...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide consecutive 8 hour Registered Nurse (RN) coverage in the facility. This has the potential to affect all 62 residents in the facilit...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store medication, label insulin and discard expired medications. This has the potential to affect all 62 residents l...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 11. On 5/17/22 at 9:42 AM, V11, CNA, and V7, CNA, assisted R3 to bed using a full body mechanical lift. V11 did not perform hand...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0730
(Tag F0730)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Certified Nursing Aides (CNAs) received twelve hours of mandatory in-service training annually. This has the potential to affe...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 harm violation(s), $51,058 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 28 deficiencies on record, including 3 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $51,058 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Illinois. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade D (45/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Calhoun Nursing & Rehab Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns CALHOUN NURSING & REHAB CENTER an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Calhoun Nursing & Rehab Center Staffed?
CMS rates CALHOUN NURSING & REHAB CENTER's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 46%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Calhoun Nursing & Rehab Center?
State health inspectors documented 28 deficiencies at CALHOUN NURSING & REHAB CENTER during 2022 to 2025. These included: 3 that caused actual resident harm, 23 with potential for harm, and 2 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Calhoun Nursing & Rehab Center?
CALHOUN NURSING & REHAB CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by NORBERT BENNETT & DONALD DENZ, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 80 certified beds and approximately 63 residents (about 79% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in HARDIN, Illinois.
How Does Calhoun Nursing & Rehab Center Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, CALHOUN NURSING & REHAB CENTER's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (46%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Calhoun Nursing & Rehab Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Calhoun Nursing & Rehab Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, CALHOUN NURSING & REHAB CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Calhoun Nursing & Rehab Center Stick Around?
CALHOUN NURSING & REHAB CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 46%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Calhoun Nursing & Rehab Center Ever Fined?
CALHOUN NURSING & REHAB CENTER has been fined $51,058 across 2 penalty actions. This is above the Illinois average of $33,589. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.
Is Calhoun Nursing & Rehab Center on Any Federal Watch List?
CALHOUN NURSING & REHAB CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.