PRAIRIE VILLAGE HEALTHCARE CTR
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Prairie Village Healthcare Center has a Trust Grade of C, which means it is average and falls in the middle of the pack among nursing homes. It ranks #279 out of 665 facilities in Illinois, placing it in the top half, and #3 out of 4 in Morgan County, suggesting only one local option is better. The facility is improving, as the number of issues found decreased from three in 2024 to two in 2025. However, staffing is a significant concern, with only 1 out of 5 stars and a high turnover rate of 64%, indicating that many staff members leave. While there have been no fines on record, the facility has faced issues such as failing to provide adequate Registered Nurse coverage for 8 consecutive hours, which could affect all residents. Additionally, there was a serious incident where a resident requiring assistance for transferring was not adequately supported, which raises concerns about resident safety. Overall, while Prairie Village shows some strengths, particularly in its health inspection ratings, there are notable weaknesses in staffing and specific care incidents that families should consider.
- Trust Score
- C
- In Illinois
- #279/665
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 64% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 19 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 15 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Illinois average (2.5)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
18pts above Illinois avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
16 points above Illinois average of 48%
The Ugly 15 deficiencies on record
Jun 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for twice-daily pulse oximet...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to identify a stage 2 pressure ulcer on the upper intergl...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide the Physician Ordered treatment to pressure sore to left heel for one of 3 residents ( R10) reviewed for pressure ulcer...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to cleanse a multi-use blood glucose machine completely to insure disinfection for 7 of 16 residents (R4, R12, R17, R23 R38, R45,...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide 8 consecutive hours of Registered Nurse (RN) Coverage. This failure has the potential to affect all 48 residents residing in the f...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. R49's Care Plan, dated 4/28/23, documents ADLs, (activities of daily living), Functional Status/Rehabilitation Potential PROB...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
3. On 05/08/2023 at 12:30 PM V14, CNA, assisted R49 to the toilet. V14 washed hands and applied gloves. V14 pulled down R49's soiled incontinent brief and assisted R49 onto the toilet. R49 using same ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to educate residents and offer the Pneumococcal Immunizations yearly, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 8 hours of consecutive Registered Nurse coverage. This failure has the potential to affect all 55 residents living in the facility....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0882
(Tag F0882)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a trained Infection Preventionist. This failure has the potential to affect all 55 residents living in the facility.
Findings includ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2022
5 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. R9's Care Plan, dated 1/11/2022, documents (R9) is limited in ability to transfer self R/T (related to) unsteadiness on feet,...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to administer medications as prescribed and at scheduled time. There were 29 opportunities with 2 errors resulting in 6.9% medica...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide complete incontinence care to 4 of 6 residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
3. On 6/14/2022 at 10:00 AM R27 was lying in bed with peanut butter sandwich on bedside table. V3, Wound Nurse, performed treatment to R27's right and left foot. V3 placed clean treatment supplies, 4x...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store/secure medication, label insulin and tuberculin vials when opened and discard expired medications. This has th...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- • 15 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • Grade C (55/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
- • 64% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Prairie Village Healthcare Ctr's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns PRAIRIE VILLAGE HEALTHCARE CTR an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Prairie Village Healthcare Ctr Staffed?
CMS rates PRAIRIE VILLAGE HEALTHCARE CTR's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 64%, which is 18 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 67%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Prairie Village Healthcare Ctr?
State health inspectors documented 15 deficiencies at PRAIRIE VILLAGE HEALTHCARE CTR during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 14 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Prairie Village Healthcare Ctr?
PRAIRIE VILLAGE HEALTHCARE CTR is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by ATIED ASSOCIATES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 126 certified beds and approximately 47 residents (about 37% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in JACKSONVILLE, Illinois.
How Does Prairie Village Healthcare Ctr Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, PRAIRIE VILLAGE HEALTHCARE CTR's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (64%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Prairie Village Healthcare Ctr?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Prairie Village Healthcare Ctr Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, PRAIRIE VILLAGE HEALTHCARE CTR has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Prairie Village Healthcare Ctr Stick Around?
Staff turnover at PRAIRIE VILLAGE HEALTHCARE CTR is high. At 64%, the facility is 18 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 67%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Prairie Village Healthcare Ctr Ever Fined?
PRAIRIE VILLAGE HEALTHCARE CTR has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Prairie Village Healthcare Ctr on Any Federal Watch List?
PRAIRIE VILLAGE HEALTHCARE CTR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.