BROOKDALE PLAZA LISLE SNF
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Brookdale Plaza Lisle SNF has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice for families, although there is room for improvement. It ranks #21 out of 665 nursing homes in Illinois, placing it in the top half of facilities in the state, and is the best option among 38 facilities in Du Page County. The facility is showing an improving trend with a decrease in reported issues from 9 in 2023 to 7 in 2024. Staffing is a strength, with a 5/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 36%, which is lower than the state average, suggesting experienced staff members are familiar with residents' needs. However, there have been some concerning incidents, including a serious case of verbal abuse that caused emotional distress to a resident and issues with hygiene and food safety in the kitchen, which indicate areas needing attention.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Illinois
- #21/665
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 36% turnover. Near Illinois's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $18,249 in fines. Higher than 80% of Illinois facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 92 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Illinois nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 19 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (36%)
12 points below Illinois average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
10pts below Illinois avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 19 deficiencies on record
Sept 2024
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy for residents with a contagious gastrointestinal infection and Foley catheter.
This applies to 2 of 2 reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly transfer resident and failed to properly dis...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for over the counter medications and to have medications stored in resident rooms.
This applies to 2...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. On 9/17/2024 at 10:10 AM, R26 was observed to have long, dirty, and jagged nails. She said she asks staff to help her cut her...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
6. R37's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 8/29/2024, showed R37 was dependent on staff for his toileting needs.
On 9/17/2024 at 10:31 AM, R37 was in bed. V9 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) and V10 (CNA)...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Antibiotic Stewardship
(Tag F0881)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an antimicrobial stewardship program, providing antibiotic use protocols, and monitoring to prevent antibiotic resistance. This a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label/date/seal/store items, remove expired items, and wear hair restraints in the facility kitchen.
This applies t...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure R4's room entryway light was working properly and provided ade...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper technique when administering a nasal sp...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0805
(Tag F0805)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident with a diagnosis of dysphagi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Liv...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify person-centered, non-pharmacological approac...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to plan and serve menus which provided variety and the minimum servings of grains as per facility policy.
This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R4...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
3 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the verbal/mental abuse of a facility residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse per the facility abuse policy.
This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 4.
The...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to suspend an alleged abusive staff, and failed to interview all potential witnesses while investigating an allegation of abuse.
This applies ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2022
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to assess a resident for self-adm...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who requires extensive assista...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0805
(Tag F0805)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure puree food was prepared to a smooth consistency for the lunch meal.
This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R1, R16, R20, R2...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 36% turnover. Below Illinois's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 19 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $18,249 in fines. Above average for Illinois. Some compliance problems on record.
About This Facility
What is Brookdale Plaza Lisle Snf's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns BROOKDALE PLAZA LISLE SNF an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Brookdale Plaza Lisle Snf Staffed?
CMS rates BROOKDALE PLAZA LISLE SNF's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 36%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Brookdale Plaza Lisle Snf?
State health inspectors documented 19 deficiencies at BROOKDALE PLAZA LISLE SNF during 2022 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 18 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Brookdale Plaza Lisle Snf?
BROOKDALE PLAZA LISLE SNF is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 55 certified beds and approximately 47 residents (about 85% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in LISLE, Illinois.
How Does Brookdale Plaza Lisle Snf Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, BROOKDALE PLAZA LISLE SNF's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (36%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Brookdale Plaza Lisle Snf?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Brookdale Plaza Lisle Snf Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, BROOKDALE PLAZA LISLE SNF has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Brookdale Plaza Lisle Snf Stick Around?
BROOKDALE PLAZA LISLE SNF has a staff turnover rate of 36%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Brookdale Plaza Lisle Snf Ever Fined?
BROOKDALE PLAZA LISLE SNF has been fined $18,249 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Illinois average of $33,261. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Brookdale Plaza Lisle Snf on Any Federal Watch List?
BROOKDALE PLAZA LISLE SNF is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.