MCLEANSBORO REHAB & HLTH C CTR
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
McLeansboro Rehab & Health Center has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average but not exceptional. It ranks #263 out of 665 nursing facilities in Illinois, placing it in the top half, and is the best option in Hamilton County. Unfortunately, the facility is currently worsening, with the number of issues increasing from 3 in 2023 to 5 in 2024. Staffing is a significant concern, with a poor rating of 1 out of 5 stars and no registered nurse coverage for 8 hours a day on weekends, which affects all residents. Additionally, there have been serious incidents, such as failing to properly manage a resident's worsening pressure ulcer and not providing adequate RN coverage, which raises potential risks for the residents. While the facility has good health inspection and quality measure ratings, the staffing issues and recent trends are important factors for families to consider.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Illinois
- #263/665
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $45,123 in fines. Higher than 69% of Illinois facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- RN staffing data not reported for this facility.
- Violations ○ Average
- 8 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Illinois average (2.5)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 8 deficiencies on record
Jun 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse working 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This failure has the potential to affect all 35 residents residin...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accur...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to add new person centered fall interventions to prevent falls for 1 (...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse working 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This failure has the potential to affect all 30 residents residin...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0825
(Tag F0825)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide or obtain the required specialized rehabilita...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a registered nurse, at least 8 consecutive hours, 7 days a week. This has the potential to affect all 23 residents who reside at this f...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2023
2 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to follow through with a wound referral for a worsening p...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide 8 hours daily, 7 days a week of Registered Nurse coverage for the facility. This failure has the potential to affect all 19 residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 harm violation(s), $45,123 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 8 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $45,123 in fines. Higher than 94% of Illinois facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
About This Facility
What is Mcleansboro Rehab & Hlth C Ctr's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns MCLEANSBORO REHAB & HLTH C CTR an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Mcleansboro Rehab & Hlth C Ctr Staffed?
CMS rates MCLEANSBORO REHAB & HLTH C CTR's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Mcleansboro Rehab & Hlth C Ctr?
State health inspectors documented 8 deficiencies at MCLEANSBORO REHAB & HLTH C CTR during 2023 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 7 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Mcleansboro Rehab & Hlth C Ctr?
MCLEANSBORO REHAB & HLTH C CTR is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by PETERSEN HEALTH CARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 43 certified beds and approximately 0 residents (about 0% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MCLEANSBORO, Illinois.
How Does Mcleansboro Rehab & Hlth C Ctr Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, MCLEANSBORO REHAB & HLTH C CTR's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.5 and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Mcleansboro Rehab & Hlth C Ctr?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Mcleansboro Rehab & Hlth C Ctr Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, MCLEANSBORO REHAB & HLTH C CTR has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Mcleansboro Rehab & Hlth C Ctr Stick Around?
MCLEANSBORO REHAB & HLTH C CTR has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Mcleansboro Rehab & Hlth C Ctr Ever Fined?
MCLEANSBORO REHAB & HLTH C CTR has been fined $45,123 across 1 penalty action. The Illinois average is $33,530. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Mcleansboro Rehab & Hlth C Ctr on Any Federal Watch List?
MCLEANSBORO REHAB & HLTH C CTR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.