SPRINGS AT MONARCH LANDING, THE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Springs at Monarch Landing in Naperville, Illinois, has received an excellent Trust Grade of A, indicating they are highly recommended and perform well. With a state rank of #81 out of 665 facilities, they are in the top half of Illinois nursing homes, and they rank #5 out of 38 in Du Page County, showing strong local performance. The facility is stable, having reported four issues in both 2023 and 2024, but there are some concerns regarding care practices. Although staffing is a strength with a 5/5 star rating and lower turnover at 43%, the facility has faced issues such as failing to sanitize kitchen equipment properly and not providing residents with the correct diet options. On a positive note, they have no fines on record and provide more RN coverage than 84% of Illinois facilities, which helps ensure better oversight of resident care.
- Trust Score
- A
- In Illinois
- #81/665
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 43% turnover. Near Illinois's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 90 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Illinois nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (43%)
5 points below Illinois average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Illinois avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record
Jul 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a residents urinary catheter tubing was kept off the floor for one resident (R26) reviewed for infection control with u...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices with regards to hand hygiene and gloving during provisions of care.
This applies...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label medications with the date when opened and failed to remove discontinued eye medication from the medication cart.
This a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to sanitize pots and pans per facility policy.
This applies to all 81 residents receiving oral diets in the facility.
The finding...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for the ability to self...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 1. R54's admission Record shows R54 was admitted on [DATE] and her diagnoses include gout, right shoulder and left knee pain, an...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving a transdermal medication patch, only had one medication patch in place during transdermal medication administra...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer an opioid medication to the correct resident. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for medications in a sample of 8.
Fin...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2022
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat a resident in a dignified manner by ensuring a ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were served menu items from the dietitian approved spreadsheet to meet the resident's nutritional needs. This...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was stored and served in a sanitary manner, dishes were cleaned under sanitary conditions, and food temperatures w...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to socially distance residents who are on droplet isolati...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Illinois.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- • 43% turnover. Below Illinois's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Springs At Monarch Landing, The's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SPRINGS AT MONARCH LANDING, THE an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Springs At Monarch Landing, The Staffed?
CMS rates SPRINGS AT MONARCH LANDING, THE's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 43%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Springs At Monarch Landing, The?
State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at SPRINGS AT MONARCH LANDING, THE during 2022 to 2024. These included: 12 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Springs At Monarch Landing, The?
SPRINGS AT MONARCH LANDING, THE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 96 certified beds and approximately 90 residents (about 94% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in NAPERVILLE, Illinois.
How Does Springs At Monarch Landing, The Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, SPRINGS AT MONARCH LANDING, THE's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (43%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Springs At Monarch Landing, The?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Springs At Monarch Landing, The Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SPRINGS AT MONARCH LANDING, THE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Springs At Monarch Landing, The Stick Around?
SPRINGS AT MONARCH LANDING, THE has a staff turnover rate of 43%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Springs At Monarch Landing, The Ever Fined?
SPRINGS AT MONARCH LANDING, THE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Springs At Monarch Landing, The on Any Federal Watch List?
SPRINGS AT MONARCH LANDING, THE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.